DOCSLIB.ORG

Aeltc Grass Courts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aeltc Grass Courts AELTC GRASS COURTS NEIL STUBLEY HEAD OF COURTS AND HORTICULTURE, AELTC 1 CONTENTS 1. Cross section of a court 2. Construction of a grass tennis court 3. Court preparation - diary guide 4. Annual maintenance of grass courts 5. The Championships 6. Grass cultivars 2 SECTION 1 CROSS SECTION OF CHAMPIONSHIP GRASS TENNIS COURT Grass 275mm Rootzone (23% clay content) 50mm Blinding Layer (7– 10mm washed pea gravel) 150mm Stone (20 – 40mm washed angular Aggregate) 100mm main drain 75mm Lateral drains Rootzone mix Stone Nil Coarse gravel Nil Fine gravel 1% Very coarse sand 2% Coarse sand 5% Medium sand 15% Fine sand 20% Very fine sand 9% Coarse silt 10% Silt 15% Clay 23% 3 SECTION 2 CONSTRUCTION OF GRASS TENNIS COURTS Before discussing the all important annual maintenance, the preparation to The Championships and The Championships itself, it is important to look at the construction of the tennis courts and the method used when relaying. All construction is designed to help achieve the aforementioned performance criteria. It is important to note that to achieve a top quality playing surface, a newly constructed grass court will need a minimum of 15 months between construction and professional play as the court will need time to settle and structure. Before any construction takes place there are a number of factors to consider. Orientation Ideally this would be in the line of north and south. The reason for this is to minimise the effect of the sun on the players’ eyes. If it is not possible to achieve the ideal for social and club play, it may not be a deciding factor. Size While the playing surface measures 23.774m x 10.973m, the area required, when including the run-off, will vary depending on the type of play catered for. Championship play requires a minimum area of 36.57m x 20.12m. Wherever possible this dimension should be considered for club play, but if not possible the area can be reduced to 33.53m x 16.45m. If a smaller area has to be settled upon, it has to be appreciated that play can be affected as there is an increasing risk of players colliding with surrounding fences. Levels The Lawn Tennis Association states that falls should not exceed 1:120 for Championship play and 1:100 for club and social play. The gradient should, ideally, be across the line of play, but if this is not possible then the fall can be in the line of play. Whether in line or across the line of play, falls must always be in a single plane. Other arrangement, e.g. a camber throughout the middle has the effect of altering the effective height of the net and is not acceptable. Access When choosing the site for a new tennis court, access must be considered for construction purposes. There is a real need to be able to deliver new materials as close as possible to the site. This is also essential for the removal of materials from any excavation which may be required. If access is limited then construction costs will rise by the very fact that labour would be required to move materials over a greater length. Drainage Outlet This can be a major factor for consideration and will have an effect on the final costings. If it is into a stream or another drainage system, permission will need to be sought from the Local and Water Authorities. Services If irrigation or electricity is required then it is important to know where they have to be linked from local supplies. Also decide where the control points are to be housed in relation to the courts. Irrigation A detailed assessment and recommendations should be carried out by a reputable engineer for your irrigation requirements. For simplicity, the building of a Championship court will be discussed. 4 THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CHAMPIONSHIP GRASS COURT THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE RING BEAM SURROUNDS WILL DEPEND ON WHAT SERVICES WILL NEED TO RUN THROUGH THEM. An average ring beam will measure 600mm x 600mm. This will allow for covers to be installed if needed and give enough stability for the support around the court. There is no one set construction profile of a grass court. The profile used at Wimbledon is one that has proved successful over the years. All the Championship courts are constructed to this one design. This requires the area used to be excavated to a depth of 475mm below the final level of the court and then backfilled with: • 150mm of 20-40mm washed angular aggregate • 50mm of 7-10mm pea gravel aggregate • 275mm of root zone Stages of Construction Mark out the exact area that is to be excavated and decide upon the exact depth of the excavation. The final levels should allow for the surface of the court to be in the region of 25-75mm proud of all surrounds. Any less and there is a considerable risk of damaging machinery when maintaining the court. It may also be dangerous for players. Excavate trenches for the drain pipes. These should be positioned across the line of play at 9m intervals to a minimum of 1:200. These drain runs are known of laterals. The lateral leads to a main drain located along the edge of one side of the construction. The main drain will continue out of the court area to a point where drainage water is discharged. Wherever possible it is advisable to have a silt trap located within the main drain not far from the court itself. The purpose of this is to allow the main drain within the court construction to be cleaned if it becomes blocked in the future as any material, such as silt, that enters into the pipe will be collected at this point rather than running the risk of blocking the pipe as it runs to the outfall. The silt trap should have a removable cover to allow for easy and regular inspection. The trap consists of a manhole type, brick construction, with the outlet pipe from the drain being placed at a higher level than the outlet pipe that runs to the discharge area. This outlet pipe should be positioned at least 150mm above the floor of the trap. The principle is that any material washed through the drainage system will sink to the bottom of the trap from where it can be periodically removed, so avoiding unwanted material passing through the system. When the drainage excavation is complete, place a thin layer of pea gravel or sand on the bed of the trenches, ensuring that the falls are correct. A suitable land drain pipe can now be placed in the trenches to a minimum depth of 230mm (invent level, bottom of the pipe) below the excavated level. The pipe sizes are 75mm for the laterals and 100mm for the main drain. When laying the pipes it is essential they are positioned at the correct levels to allow a satisfactory passage of the water without any risk of it becoming static. It is advisable to test that the pipes are working before carefully filling the trench back in with stone, avoiding any disturbance to the pipes. Once all the land drain work has been completed then construction can commence. 5 The next procedure is to lay the stone and pea gravel to the correct depth throughout the court. To ensure that the materials are laid at the correct level one of two methods can be used: 1. If a laser level is available, constant checks can be made very quickly. 2. By placing pegs at 3m centres and making a line at 150mm to show the level of the angular stone and a further marker at 50mm above the line of the stone to indicate the final level of the pea gravel. When installing the materials care must be taken not to damage any work that has been completed or to the firm soil base upon which the stone is to be laid. During wet weather it can be an advantage to lay a geo-textile on the soil so avoiding the stone being pushed into the soil during construction. Whatever product is used, care must be taken to avoid placing it over the drain ditches if there is a risk of impeding water movement in the future. To avoid the pea gravel layer becoming mixed with the stone layer, divide the area into quarters and start at the furthest section from the access to the court. Lay the stone and then the pea gravel, consolidating both to the correct levels before commencing the next quarter. Any movement of the stone caused by the wheels of the machinery should be constantly raked back to level. When the operation is completed, remove any pegs used and fill the holes with the appropriate stone. The completion of the stone installation should result in an even bed on which to introduce the root zone. The most important element when introducing the root zone is to ensure that the materials are compacted evenly so avoiding the creation of any air pockets or soft non compacted areas which will be prone to sinkage at some time in the future. The method used at Wimbledon is to introduce the soil in 50mm layers, consolidating each layer with a 3-5 tonne track digger, raking level before the next 50mm layer is introduced. The levels can be checked using the same procedure as with the stone. During the process of introducing the soil it is vital that the area is kept dry.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How the Court Surface Is Affecting the Serve-And-Volley Tristan Barnett
    How the court surface is affecting the serve-and-volley Tristan Barnett Strategic Games www.strategicgames.com.au 1. Introduction The modern version of the game (official name of Lawn Tennis) as we recognize it today was designed and patented by Major Walter Clopton Wingfield in 1873. Two years later in 1875, the official rules of the game were drawn up by Marylebone Cricket Club, and two years later in 1877, Wimbledon began on a grass surface as the first official championships. All four grand slam events have been played on a grass surface. Wimbledon is the only grand slam event played on a grass court today and has always been played on a grass court surface. The French Open began in 1891 on a grass surface and remained on grass until 1928 when the surface was changed to clay. The US Open began in 1881 on a grass surface; until it was changed to clay from 1975-1977 and from 1978 has been played on a hard court surface. Finally, the Australian Open began in 1905 on a grass surface and remained on grass until 1988 when the surface was changed to a hard court. There has been a change in the proportion of tournaments played on different court surfaces from 1877 to 2010. Firstly, for the first 14 years of the game, all tournaments (grand slam and non grand slam) were played on grass. Secondly, for the first 101 years of the game all tournaments were played on the natural surfaces of grass and clay. Thirdly, according to the ITF, until the early 1970’s, the majority of tournaments were played on grass including three out of the four grand slams.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation of Ball Degradation Events in Professional Tennis
    Sports Eng DOI 10.1007/s12283-017-0228-z ORIGINAL ARTICLE Characterisation of ball degradation events in professional tennis 1,2,3 1 3 1 Ben Lane • Paul Sherratt • Xiao Hu • Andy Harland Ó The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Tennis balls are acknowledged to degrade with appears to influence the distribution of ball speed on impact use and are replaced at regular intervals during professional with the surface or racket, suggesting a surface-specific matches to maintain consistency and uniformity in per- degradation test may be beneficial. As a result of these formance, such that the game is not adversely affected. findings a new test protocol has been proposed, utilising the Balls are subject to the international tennis federation’s in-play data, to define the frequency of impacts and impact (ITF) ball approval process, which includes a degradation conditions to equate to nine games of professional tennis test to ensure a minimum standard of performance. The across the different surfaces. aim of this investigation was to establish if the ITF degradation test can assess ball longevity and rate of Keywords Tennis Á Ball Á Impact Á Hawk-Eye Á Surface Á degradation and determine if there is a need for a new Speed Á Angle Á Degradation degradation test that is more representative of in-play conditions. Ball tracking data from four different profes- sional events, spanning the three major court surfaces, 1 Introduction including both men’s and women’s matches were analysed. The frequency of first serves, second serves, racket impacts Approximately 360 million tennis balls are manufactured and surface impacts were assessed and the corresponding each year [1], with wholesale sales figures in the region of distribution of ball speed and (for surface impacts) impact $92 million in the United States alone in 2015 [2].
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennis Court
    M. ROSS ARCH. 422 • A RACQUET CLUB FOR LUBBOCK, TEXAS. A Racquet Club for Lubbock, Texas A Thesis Program in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for the Bachelor of Architecture degree. Design Option Presented by Michael David Ross Texas Tech University Spring 1978 1, INTRODUCTION 2, THE CLIENT 3, FINANCING 4, THE SITE 11 S> FACILITIES 24 ^, RESTRICTIONS 40 7, APPENDIX 54 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF THE PROJECT The nature of this thesis program is the development of the most precise and complete collection of data concerning my topic, A Racquet Club for Lubbock, Texas. Some of the questions this program will answer are: What is a Racquet Club? Who this Racquet Club is for? Where is this Racquet Club located? What goes on in this club? The elements composing the physical make-up of the facility are: 1. Clubhouse A) offices B) lounge and dining C) pro-shop D) lockers and dressing facilities E) indoor tennis and racquet ball courts 2. Outdoor tennis courts This facility not only will enhance the city of Lubbock but also provide its members a com­ plex that enables them to play the game as it should be played and to savor the deepest pleas­ ure the game has to offer. HISTORY OF THE PROJECT The name and the game came from the ancient net and racquet sport known in France where it was invented, as Jeu de Paume. This sport had its origins in the Middle Ages. It is mentioned in twelfth and thirteenth century manuscripts. In the sixteenth century the game was known to be exclusively an aristo­ cratic game because of the high cost of building courts.
    [Show full text]
  • Applied Sciences
    applied sciences Article Analysis of Serve and Serve-Return Strategies in Elite Male and Female Padel Bernardino J Sánchez-Alcaraz 1, Diego Muñoz 2,* , Francisco Pradas 3 , Jesús Ramón-Llin 4 , Jerónimo Cañas 5 and Alejandro Sánchez-Pay 1 1 Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Murcia, C/Argentina, s/n, 30720 San Javier, Murcia, Spain; [email protected] (B.J.S.-A.); [email protected] (A.S.-P.) 2 Department of Didactic of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, Faculty of Sports Science, University of Extremadura, Avda de la Universidad, s/n, 10003 Cáceres, Spain 3 Department of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, Faculty of Human Sciences and Education, University of Zaragoza, C/Pedro Cerbuna, 12, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain; [email protected] 4 Department of Musical, Plastic and Corporal Expression, Faculty of Education, University of Valencia, Av. Dels Tarongers, 4, 46022 Valencia, Spain; [email protected] 5 Department of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Granada, Carretera de Alfacar, 21, 18071 Granada, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-927-257-460 Received: 22 August 2020; Accepted: 22 September 2020; Published: 24 September 2020 Abstract: This aim of this study was to analyze serve and return statistics in elite padel players regarding courtside and gender. The sample contained 668 serves and 600 returns of serves from 14 matches (7 male and 7 female) of the 2019 Masters Finals World Padel Tour. Variables pertaining to serve (number, direction, court side and effectiveness), return of serve (direction, height, stroke type and effectiveness) and point outcome were registered through systematic observation.
    [Show full text]
  • Tennis Courts: a Construction and Maintenance Manual
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 433 677 EF 005 376 TITLE Tennis Courts: A Construction and Maintenance Manual. INSTITUTION United States Tennis Court & Track Builders Association.; United States Tennis Association. PUB DATE 1998-00-00 NOTE 246p.; Colored photographs may not reproduce clearly. AVAILABLE FROM U.S. Tennis Court & Track Builders Association, 3525 Ellicott Mills Dr., Suite N., Ellicott City, MD 21043-4547. Tel: 410-418-4800; Fax: 410-418-4805; Web site: <http://www.ustctba.com>. PUB TYPE Guides - Non-Classroom (055) -- Reports Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC10 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Construction (Process); *Facility Guidelines; Facility Improvement; Facility Planning; *Maintenance; *Tennis IDENTIFIERS *Athletic Facilities ABSTRACT This manual addresses court design and planning; the construction process; court surface selection; accessories and amenities; indoor tennis court design and renovation; care and maintenance tips; and court repair, reconstruction, and renovation. General and membership information is provided on the U.S. Tennis Court and Track Builders Association and the U.S. Tennis Association, along with lists of certified tennis court builders and award winning tennis courts from past years. Numerous design and layout drawings are also included, along with Tennis Industry Magazine's maintenance planner. Sources of information and a glossary of terms conclude the manual. (GR) ******************************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made
    [Show full text]
  • The Real Sport of Kings When Our Family Moved from Notting Hill Gate
    The Real Sport of Kings When our family moved from Notting Hill Gate to larger quarters on Brook Green I realized it was a ten-minute bike ride to The Queen’s Club. A mecca of lawn tennis, with grass courts, Queen’s was known for the Invitational that preceded Wimbledon. As a youth, spurred by my father whose passion was tennis, I played a lot, at times as many as eight hours a day. The game was so bound with Southampton’s lifestyle that even the houses, with their white- painted frames and green shutters, could seem a reverse echo of the grass courts on which we played. It is hard to imagine a Long Island village where we played only three months a year competing with Florida and California, but the town boasted a Wimbledon winner and several national champions. The two grandsons of Dwight Davis who had given the eponymous cup were daily opponents, and the Meadow Club Invitational (now the U.S. Amateur Championship) reigned as the longest continuing tournament on the grass court circuit. This tournament, which brought the great “bums,” as they were known, roaring in on their jalopies was the social high point of the Southampton summer, crowned by a dance and massive silver trophies that begged to be melted down. We put them up in our houses and the money I made ball-boying more than paid for all the presents I bought my parents. For much of my youth I aspired to that kind of athletic career. I wanted to travel to fabled venues: Wimbledon, Rome, Monte Carlo, Paris, Rapallo, Gstaad.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Visualization and Analysis of Playing Styles in Tennis
    https://doi.org/10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2021.1.VDA-319 © 2021, Society for Imaging Science and Technology Data Visualization and Analysis of Playing Styles in Tennis Shiraj Pokharel and Ying Zhu Department of Computer Science and Creative Media Industries Institute, Georgia State University Atlanta - 30303, USA Email: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract are used to show the ”fingerprint” of a player’s pattern of play. Sports data analysis and visualization are useful for gaining The analysis presented in this paper is based on micro-level insights into the games. In this paper, we present a new visual an- performance data from professional tennis matches. Although we alytics technique called Tennis Fingerprinting to analyze tennis focus on tennis in this paper, this idea can be extended to the players’ tactical patterns and styles of play. Tennis is a compli- analysis of other sports (including Esports), if micro-level per- cated game, with a variety of styles, tactics, and strategies. Tennis formance data is available. experts and fans are often interested in discussing and analyzing tennis players’ different styles. In tennis, style is a complicated Related Works and often abstract concept that cannot be easily described or ana- Traditional tennis analytics focuses on analyzing high-level lyzed. The proposed visualization method is an attempt to provide statistics, such as serve percentages, serve winning percentages, a concrete and visual representation of a tennis player’s style. We etc. These statistics mostly deal with the outcome of points, demonstrate the usefulness of our method by analyzing matches games, and matches, not how the points are played.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plantar Pressure Analysis of Open Stance Forehand in Female Tennis Players
    Chen, C, et al. (2019). The Plantar Pressure Analysis of Open Stance Forehand in Female Tennis Players. Physical Activity and Health, 3(1), pp. 63–70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/paah.37 RESEARCH The Plantar Pressure Analysis of Open Stance Forehand in Female Tennis Players Chaoyi Chen, Zhiqiang Liang and Shudong Li Faculty of Sports Science, Ningbo University, CN Corresponding author: Chaoyi Chen ([email protected]) Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze plantar pressure during the open stance forehand (OSF) in female tennis players. Methods: Seven female players executed the tennis forehand technique with open stance in the biomechanical laboratory. A portable pressure insole system was adopted to collect mean pressure (MP), peak pressure (PP), force (F), pressure-time integral (PTI) and contact area (CA) in 7 regions of the feet. Independent sample T-test was used to analyze the difference among these parameters. Results: F, PP in the first phalangeal region (BT) and the remaining four toe regions (OT) of the right foot (RF) were both larger than the left foot (LF); F in the fourth and fifth metatarsophalangeal joint (M4-5), the middle foot region (MF), hind foot region（HF）and PP in M4-5 of LF were significantly greater than the same region in RF; MP in BT and OT of RF showed significantly higher pressure than LF. While MP among areas of M4-5 and HF of LF was significantly greater than RF; PTI, CA in OT, M4-5 and MF of RF were significantly higher than LF while M1, M2-3, M4-5 and MF of LF showed significant smaller.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Surfaces for Recreation Bulletin Number 37
    Artificial Surfaces for Recreation Bulletin Number 37 A report of the proceedings of a Block Course held at Lincoln College, Canterbury, May 11-1 4 1 981. The course was designed to study and evaluate the range of artificial surfacing material·currently available for indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. Edited by J. O. Taylor I~I Sponsored by The N.Z. Institute of Park and Recreation Administration (Inc) GRJ.~I in association with .-.. • The Department of Horticulture, Landscape and Parks, ~I' Lincoln College, Canterbury. January 1982. FOREWORD In opening the Block Course on Artificial Surfaces for Recreation, Mr Lance Cross, C.B.E., Chairman, New Zealand Council for Recreation and Sport, quoted from a U.N.E.S.C.O. Survey that over the next 25 years the major problem facing the world as a whole, will be the effective use of leisure time. He went on to develop the theme that maximum use must be made of facilities already existing before expensive new recreation and sports arenas were developed. On a population basis, New Zealand needs only four standard Olympic pools, but many lido-type pools are still required. Local Authorities are faced with ever rising costs for the provision and maintenance of play grounds, sports grounds and recreational facilities, but the trick of how to reduce these costs, let alone maintain costs, eludes most experts today. The aim of the Block Course was to study the range of methods and materials available for the construction of artificial surfaces used in recreation and to come up with some positive ideas on what can best be used inside and outside to provide more effectively for the requirements of our recreating communities.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Confirmed Calendar 1
    2021 confirmed calendar Tournament Divisions Start Date End Date USTA Level City State Surface Host Tournament Director USTA National Mixed 50, 60, 70, 75, & 80 Hard Court Championships X50, X60, X70, X75, X80 TBD TBD Level 1 Palm Desert CA Hard Desert Tennis Events Caerwyn Evans USTA National Same Gender Couples Doubles Hard Court Championships Same Gender Op, 80, 100, 120, 140 3/6/2021 3/7/2021 Level 1 Rancho Mirage CA Hard Mission Hills Country Club (SGE) Nabil Najjar Tennis Channel USTA National Husband Wife Combined Age Grass Court Championships HW 100, HW120, HW 140 3/7/2021 3/13/2021 Level 1 Rancho Mirage CA Grass Mission Hills Country Club Mas Kimball / Steve Solomon USTA National Women's 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 Clay Court Championships W40, W50, W60, W70, W80 Sgls & Dbls 3/16/2021 3/20/2021 Level 1 Palm Beach Gardens FL Clay City of Palm Beach Gardens William McDermott / Trish Faulkner Tennis Channel & Crabel Capital USTA National Men's 65 Hard Court Championship $10,000 Prize Money M65 Sgls & Dbls 3/21/2021 3/27/2021 Level 1 Palm Springs CA Hard Tennis Events Mas Kimball / Steve Solomon USTA National Men's 40, 45, & Mixed 45 Clay Court Championships M40, M45 Sgls & Dbls X45 4/8/2021 4/13/2021 Level 1 Ft Lauderdale FL Clay Lauderdale Tennis Club Frank Hughes USTA National Women's 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85 & 90 Clay Court Championships W35, W45, W55, W65, W75, W85, W90 Sgls & Dbls 4/12/2021 4/18/2021 Level 1 Houston TX Clay Houston Racquet Club Susan Bramlette USTA National Men's 45 Hard Court Championships M45 Sgls & Dbls 4/26/2021 5/2/2021
    [Show full text]
  • Tennis-Point
    Tennis for Beginners Getting Ready to Hit the Court Midwest Sports Table of Contents Tennis: An Introduction ........................................................................................ i Section 1: The Basics ................................................................................................. 3 Chapter 1:Tennis Terms to Know .......................................................... 4 Chapter 2: The Ins and Outs of Tennis Scoring .................................... 8 Chapter 3: Finding the Perfect Beginners’ Racquet and Equipment . 11 Chapter 4: Outfitting Yourself for the Court ...................................... 17 Section 2: The Essential Elements of Play .................................................. 21 Chapter 5: The Grip............................................................................... 22 Chapter 6: The Serve ............................................................................. 25 Chapter 7: The Forehand ...................................................................... 28 Chapter 8: The Backhand ...................................................................... 31 Chapter 9: Volleys .................................................................................. 34 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 36 Sources ............................................................................................................. 37 i ii TENNIS FOR BEGINNERS Tennis: An Introduction Have
    [Show full text]
  • Facts and Statistics Indicate Fixing at the Very Top of Men's Tennis
    Facts and statistics indicate fixing at the very top of men’s tennis by Katarina Pijetlovic, LL.B, LL.M, LL.Lic. LL.D cand. [email protected] EU and sports law academic Facts and statistics strongly indicate that draws at the Grand Slam tournaments 2008-2011 might have been fixed at the very top of men's tennis. Namely, in 12 out of 12 Grand Slam tournaments played on hard and grass courts between 2008-2011, Federer and Djokovic were always drawn to the same half of the draw, while Nadal and Murray were drawn to the other half. In addition, in five of those 12 tournaments Murray was not among the first four seeded players, so his draw was conducted separately five times. Thus, the statistics are as follows: to get the same result 12 out of 12 times, probability is 1 in 4096. For the case of Murray's separate draws which produced the same result 5 out of 5 times, it is 1 in 32. THEREFORE, THE PROBABILITY TO OBTAIN DRAW RESULTS AS OBTAINED AT THE 12 GRAND SLAM TOURNAMENTS IS 131072 TO 1 (4096 x 32 = 131072). Combined with the study conducted by ESPN on the draws of unseeded players at US Open it reaches 1 in many BILLIONS. FACEBOOK PAGE ON THIS ISSUE WITH MORE DETAILS AVAILABLE AT http://www.facebook.com/pages/Tennis‐ biggest‐public‐secret/284730451547505?sk=wall DRAWING PROCEDURE In general, at the Grand Slam tournaments players are entered in the draw sheet based on their current standing on the ATP rank list.
    [Show full text]