DOCSLIB.ORG

Persons Case Petition and Letters Answers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Persons Case Petition and Letters Answers Single Lesson Case: Persons Case Petition and Letters Answers This guide has been written to provide teachers with some detailed answers to the analysis questions posed in the case. These answers are not based on student work and have been written by the Virtual Historian staff. Do not expect this much detail in typical student work. Please use these answers only as a guide for evaluation and as a starting point for discussion or further activities. Source 1: Petition of August 27, 1927, containing the five Alberta women’s two questions Question 1) When was the letter written? Who wrote it and who was it addressed to? Answer: The letter was written on August 27, 1927 by Emily Murphy, Henrietta Edwards, Nellie McClung, Louise McKinney, and Irene Parlby. Specifically, it was likely written by Emily Murphy who handled the correspondence of the Famous Five. It was addressed to the Governor-General in Council of the Canadian government in Ottawa. Students can find these answers both in the source references and in the text of the letter itself. Students hopefully will learn to check source material references on a regular basis. Question 2) For what purpose was the letter written? How are the Senate of Canada and possible amendments to the British North America Act involved? Answer: For this question, the answers are found in the subject area of the reference material, in the letter, and possibly in the introductory summary information. The letter was written to change the constitution so that women could be eligible for the Canadian Senate. The constitution (British North American Act) was unclear concerning this matter so the petitioners were seeking an official statement. The constitution might have needed to be amended to allow for a female person to be in the Canadian Senate. Source 2: Letter from Emily Murphy to the Deputy Minister of Justice, July 26 1928. Question 1) Based on what the letter describes, what has happened to the original petition of the Famous Five? What do you think the perspective is of the women involved in this petition? Why? Answer: Since this letter is also an appeal, the original petition must have been rejected. The letter mentions the need for the writer’s position to ‘be clear’, so the petitioner’s likely feel that their petition is not being carefully considered. The women make specific legal comments that challenge the Supreme Court’s decision. For example, the Famous Five state that with ‘no contrary intent being shown’, the word person in the BNA act must refer to women as well as men. The women also refer to legal precedent in the form of the Imperial Interpretative Act. The petitioners feel that the Supreme Court was in error in focusing on the meaning of the word ‘qualified’ and did not address the petition’s focus on whether women were considered ‘persons’ in the BNA Act. By not answering the question put forth in the petition, the women feel that the matter is not resolved. Question 2) Why might the Supreme Court of Canada have ruled against the Famous Five’s petition for women to be confirmed as ‘persons’ under the British North America Act? Why is legal change often resisted by those with power and influence? Answer: While today in Canada we take rights almost for granted, in 1929 women’s rights were still a divisive political and social issue. The rights of women had gradually been increasing, but there was considerable resistance from governments. A government in power is often not likely to want to take risks or ‘change the balance’ by providing a specific group with more legal rights. Not all women in Canada could vote at this time. Prior to World War II, democratic governments were slow to take action in regards to increasing people’s rights, especially those of groups who had traditionally been denied many rights. Sexism also undoubtedly played a part in such thinking. Question 3) Examine the legal arguments made by Emily Murphy. What evidence and logic does she use to make her points? Answer: Emily Murphy’s legal arguments are quite specific and detailed. First, she states that the Supreme Court seems to have ruled based upon matters not relevant to the British North America Act. The key legal concept of precedent is used when she refers to the Imperial Interpretation Act. This earlier Act requires interpretations to assume words such as ‘person’ refer to both sexes unless specifically stated. She uses legal phrasing when stating that because ‘no contrary intent’ was shown, the word person must refer to both genders. Ms Murphy feels the Supreme Court was off topic in discussing the qualifications of Senators as that is legally dealt with in the Senate. In her opinion, the Supreme Court did not address the question of the meaning of the word ‘person’ but focused in error upon the meaning of the word ‘qualified’ as applied to the word ‘person’. In essence, she argues that the Supreme Court did not make a legal ruling on the matter as addressed to them and were off-topic when making their ruling. Source 3: Decision of the Lords of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, October 18 1929. Question 1) What type of source is this? In what ways is it similar and different to the letters you have examined? (Hint-Who produced it? Why? For what audience was it produced?) Answer: This is a formal legal ruling from the highest government-appointed legal body for the British Empire (including Canada). The other sources were a petition and a letter requesting an appeal to a Supreme Court ruling on the petition. All three sources are involved in the legal process, showing how the petition started through how it was resolved. This document is unique because it is a formal governmental legal ruling by appointed judges. The document is also intended for publication to a wide audience (especially those in the legal profession) and resulted in changes to existing laws as well as establishing legal precedent for further expansion of women’s rights. Question 2) How are the historical context and perspective different or similar to your own? (Hint-How were the rights of women different then? Would a legal appeal today still need Britain to make the final decision?) Answer: Context is crucial to this question. The differences are more likely to be noted by students. Students need to recall how the legal and social status of women differed from today. Women’s rights were a very divisive and political issue and the vote was not available across all of Canada. Canada was also not fully independent until 1982 when the constitution was repatriated to Canada. For similarities, it could be argued that women’s rights have still not been fully met in Canada. From a global perspective, women’s rights are still a serious issue today. Question 3) What is the main argument of the source? How is this argument similar to any of the other sources? What would account for such similarities? Answer: The ruling first clarifies the question to refer to whether women are considered ‘qualified persons’ eligible to become members of the Senate of Canada. While stating that a unanimous judgment by the Supreme Court of Canada is usually definitive, the Privy Council noted that the word ‘person’ is ambiguous and can include both genders. Furthermore, other sections of the BNA act use the word person to include women and ‘male persons’ is used when being specific is important. The Privy Council also agreed that the Imperial Interpretation Act suggests the word ‘persons’ is a reference to both genders. Answer: The argument is very similar to the Famous Five’s arguments against the original Supreme Court ruling in Source #2. Additionally, the original petition question from Source #1 is referenced. Answer: The similarities are due to the fact that the petition started to whole legal process and is quoted during each step of the petition. The legal arguments used by the Famous Five are also the same as the final legal ruling. Final Activity: Write a news article about the Privy Council ruling and the Famous Five. Pretend you are a newspaper writer from 1929 and speculate on what this ruling could mean for women in Canada. Be sure to use the details and perspective of the sources you have examined to help you write. Note: For this activity, a satisfactory news article should have several elements. The format of a news article should be followed, including proper spelling and grammar. The basis of the story should follow the ‘5 W’s’ of who, what, when, where, and why. The basic essentials of the story should be summarized and some opinion should be stated about how and why the legal ruling is important. The historical context of the time should be recognized to avoid present-day judgments. Specifics should ideally come directly from the Virtual Historian case the students just examined using sources as evidence and historical empathy as a cognitive tool to contextualize them. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction to World War I My Top 3-5 Points from Brainstorm on “War” My Top 3-5 Points from Video Clip on WWI
    Name: ____________________________Date:______________________Block:___________ Introduction to World War I My Top 3-5 Points from Brainstorm on “War” My Top 3-5 Points from Video Clip on WWI ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ ★ 1. Identify the four major causes for World War I and their definitions. Write about Militarism, Alliances, Imperialism and Nationalism below. Make sure to give examples and talk about your examples when you are writing your reasons. Issue Summary and Examples Significance and Reasoning M -2 -1 0 1 2 Minor Cause Major Cause Reasons: A -2 -1 0 1 2 Minor Cause Major Cause Reasons: I -2 -1 0 1 2 Minor Cause Major Cause Reasons: N -2 -1 0 1 2 Minor Cause Major Cause Reasons: 2. On the map below, color and design a legend to illustrate the Triple Alliance and Triple Entente (pg. 175). 3. Draw a timeline illustrating the Domino Effect (pg.175): 4. Who was Franz Ferdinand and how did he contribute to the start of WWI? 5. Using the interactive map on the UK national archives site (http://nationalarchives.gov.uk/first- world-war/a-global-view/), click on Canada and Newfoundland. Read through the Overview, Western Front, Homefront, Regiments, Other Forces and Key Figures to complete the chart below: Western Front: Details of Homefront: Details of issues at Other forces/Key battles, number of home, how the people felt about Figures/events: Details you soldiers/casualties, events of the war find interesting the war Canada Newfoundland Name: _________________________Date:___________________________Block:_________ Canada’s Entrance Into World War I My Top 3-5 Points on why Canada & Canadians My Top 3-5 Points from Discussion & Video about why want to join and fight in World War I.
    [Show full text]
  • High and Splendid Braveries
    High and Splendid Braveries HIGH AND SPLENDID BRAVERIES By Caroline Russell-King The Playwright acknowledges the assistance of the Banff playRites Colony - a partnership between the Canada Council for the Arts, The Banff Centre for the Arts, and Alberta Theatre Projects Caroline Russell-King 2021 High and Splendid Braveries HIGH AND SPLENDID BRAVERIES Was written with financial support of the Alberta Foundation of the Arts, the Banff PlayRites Colony, The Banff Centre for the Arts, and Alberta Theatre Projects - many, many thanks. DEDICATED TO My mother-in-law, Angela Matthews, such a polite political protester, who was with me at the unveiling. The Prime Minister, Jean Chretien, who shook my hand and made all the difference. The Governor General, Adrienne Clarkson and Minister Sheila Copps, role models who spoke on the day. Francis Wright, past CEO of the Famous Five Foundation - a force to be reckoned with. Gerald, my Arthur and Emma, my love. (And of course) THE FIVE Irene Parlby, Henrietta Muir Edwards, Louise McKinney, Nellie McClung and Emily Murphy, my favourite. MY DEEPEST THANKS TO Ken Cameron, for asking great questions. Bob White, for everything at Banff and keeping me away from the BIC. Caroline Russell-King 2021 High and Splendid Braveries PLAYWRIGHT MUSEINGS This is of course, a dramatic literary translation of historic facts. I have borrowed lines from the published authors namely, Emily Murphy, Nellie McClung and Stephen Leacock. There has been the usual weaving and blurring of events to construct the dramatic arc. Initially, I had intended to write a play about The Five, but their lives were so expansive.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded Begining in the 1960S, Was Connected to the Women’S Liberation Treatment
    comparisons between moments in the past and the present, or between two points in the past. We evaluate change over time using his guide complements provincial and territorial turning points and the ideas of progress and decline. curricula in middle and high school history and Sketch from the collection of a British Prominence: Was the person or event recognized as Tsocial science classes. The historical thinking woman living near Niagara Falls, significant at the time? Why or why not? What did it mean to Primary Source Evidence is the raw material that historians use inscribed: “The black woman who framework developed by Dr. Peter Seixas and the with her husband took in + nursed the be “significant”? to assess the past. When evaluating sources — letters, newspaper poor sick black man who could not Historical Thinking Project has inspired classroom pay for his lodging - she lived near us articles, photographs, diaries, government records, etc. — we search activities to promote research and analysis, engage and became a great friend.” Caroline Consequences: What effect(s) did the person or event have? for clues to help us understand the rationale and aim of the creators, Bucknall Estcourt, 1838/1839 (courtesy critical thinking, promote communication skills, and Library and Archives Canada/Acc. No. Impact: How widespread and long-lasting was the person or and the historical context of the source. 1950-29-64/C-093963). explore ethical questions. The lessons may be used event’s impact? sequentially or individually. Cause and Consequence: Historians want to understand both Women Say No to Racism Revealing: What does the person or event reveal about the Owing to demand for more resources exploring (courtesy City of Toronto Archives/ the causes and impacts of past events.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcdonald's-Styie Burgers Big Hit Remembrance
    Pool is back in swim The proposed new indoor pool human government AMS undertakings and will reject them between students, the ad­ going to council soon to request received a resounding vote of executive. in the future. ministration and outside con­ permission to instruct the architect confidence Thursday. "The vote was a major decision "No matter what the result of the tributors, mainly the federal and to proceed on working drawings for In a turnout massive by UBC in favor of the pool and the whole vote it was interesting and im­ provincial governments. the pool. standards, 6,048 students voted by referendum was a fucking waste of portant that so many people The government portion, now Mochnacki said the committee a 71.4 per cent margin to continue time," Thomson said. voted," Mochna'cki said. "Apathy accounting for. more than the should not proceed with the student funding of the con­ "This vote has strengthened our may be disappearing from the planned original one-third share drawings until the financing has troversial structure. hand in obtaining government campus." due to inflation and the fixed been secured. In two days of voting, 4,283 financing of the pool." The referendum vote easily student and administration shares, He said if the government does students marked their ballots AMS grad rep Stefan Mochnacki, surpassed the two-thirds, majority has yet to be obtained. not help finance the pool, a smaller "no", rejecting the idea of with­ a leader in the anti-pool fight, said needed to make the outcome Pool committee member Bob pool will have to be built unless drawing their $925,000 share of the the pool could be the "last of the binding.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chamber of Though and Actions
    CANADA’S SENATE A Chamber of THOUGHT AND ACTION © 2019 Senate of Canada I 1-800-267-7362 I [email protected] 2 ABOUT THE SENATE The Senate is the Upper House in Canada’s Senators also propose their own bills and generate Parliament. It unites a diverse group of discussion about issues of national importance in accomplished Canadians in service the collegial environment of the Senate Chamber, of their country. where ideas are debated on their merit. Canada’s first prime minister, Sir John A. Macdonald, The Senate was created to ensure Canada’s regions famously called it a chamber of sober second thought were represented in Parliament. Giving each region but it is much more than that. It is a source of ideas, an equal number of seats was meant to prevent inspiration and legislation in its own right. the more populous provinces from overpowering the smaller ones. Parliament’s 105 senators shape Canada’s future. Senators scrutinize legislation, suggest improvements Over the years, the role of senators has evolved. and fix mistakes. In a two-chamber parliament, the Senate In addition to representing their region, they also acts as a check on the power of the prime minister and advocate for underrepresented groups like cabinet. Any bill must pass both houses — the Senate Indigenous peoples, visible and linguistic and the House of Commons — before it can become law. minorities, and women. There shall be one Parliament for Canada, consisting of the Queen, an Upper House styled the Senate, and the House of Commons. Constitution Act, 1867, section 17 3 HISTORY Canada would not exist were it not for the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS INSTRUCTOR’S NOTES 3-4 Contents
    ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS INSTRUCTOR’S NOTES 3-4 Contents The Alberta Legislature Building 1 Political Parties 13 Outcomes Outcomes Government of Canada 3 Alberta’s Leaders 14 Outcomes Outcomes How a Bill Becomes Law in Canada 5 Postactivity 15 Outcomes Task Task The Statues in the Rotunda 7 Postactivity 18 Outcomes Chamber Doors and the Coat of Arms 9 Postactivity 19 Outcomes Task The Mace 10 Postactivity 20 Outcomes Task Student Assessment Form How Government Representatives Are Elected 11 Outcomes The Alberta Legislature Building Outcomes This activity provides a very general orientation to the Alberta Legislature Building. By the end of this activity learners will be able to • Recognize and use vocabulary to describe different parts of the Alberta Legislature Building • Demonstrate understanding of a short description of the Alberta Legislature Building Procedure 1. Have learners complete the vocabulary match activity either on their own or with a partner. Take up the answers with the class. 2. Inform learners that they will be listening to a text about the Alberta Legislature Building. 3. Read the text below, and have them complete the cloze activity based on what they hear. 4. Take up the answers. 5. As a follow-up to this activity learners could work in pairs or small groups and practise describing enlarged copies of the photos without looking at their notes. 1 | Instructor's Notes: The Alberta Legislature Building | Outcomes | The Legislature Grounds The front of the building includes a fountain and a reflecting pool . People are encouraged to come here all year-round to enjoy the grounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the Senate
    CANADA Debates of the Senate 2nd SESSION . 40th PARLIAMENT . VOLUME 146 . NUMBER 58 OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Wednesday, October 7, 2009 ^ THE HONOURABLE NOËL A. KINSELLA SPEAKER CONTENTS (Daily index of proceedings appears at back of this issue). Debates Service: D'Arcy McPherson, Chambers Building, Room 943, Tel. 613-995-5756 Publications Centre: David Reeves, Chambers Building, Room 969, Tel. 613-947-0609 Published by the Senate Available from PWGSC ± Publishing and Depository Services, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0S5. Also available on the Internet: http://www.parl.gc.ca 1483 THE SENATE Wednesday, October 7, 2009 The Senate met at 1:30 p.m., the Speaker in the chair. The Xtending Hope Partnership is an initiative based at the Coady International Institute that works to help, develop and Prayers. support the people, governments and NGOs in Rwanda and Botswana as they deal with the HIV/AIDS epidemic. Coady partnered with First Nations communities for the First Nations SENATORS' STATEMENTS At-Sea Mentoring Initiative, working to develop the technical skills of Aboriginal fishers working in the commercial inshore fishery. COADY INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE There are thousands of international graduates of the institute Hon. James S. Cowan (Leader of the Opposition): Honourable who return home and work directly to improve the lives of their senators, today I am delighted to pay tribute to an extraordinary fellow citizens, applying the many lessons learned at Coady to institution, the Coady International Institute at St. Francis help build a more just, secure and prosperous future. Xavier University in Antigonish, Nova Scotia. The institute also provides opportunities for young Canadians, The Coady Institute is celebrating its golden anniversary this helping recent university graduates work overseas on internships year.
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Pieces Version 2.Pdf (255.5Ko)
    Talking pieces: Political buttons and narratives of equal rights activism in Canada Talking pieces: Political buttons and narratives of equal rights activism in Canada Norda Majekodunmi “Individuals and organizations express themselves not just through the written and spoken word, but also through their interactions with their material world. The things that people throw away, the things they chose to keep, the gifts they give, the things they treasure – all of this material residue documents lives in ways that support, complement, extend and expand the written documentary record” (Jill Severn, Adventures in the Third Dimension, 2009: 221) Introduction Memory institutions, such as archives, are charged with collecting and preserving historical memories, stories and evidence often found in the form of textual documents. An archive’s ultimate goal is to ensure access to these memories for future generations. But, unfortunately, as suggested by Greene (2003), they are not neutral spaces; instead they privilege the stories and memories of the dominant society, often to the exclusion of marginalized and racialized groups. This practice results in inadequate representation of other social dimensions: race, gender and sexuality. The existence and accessibility of the Jean Augustine collection at the Clara Thomas Archives and Special Collection at York University, however, is an example of a unique collection that counters this hegemony. This collection is comprised of both textual documents, photographs, artifacts and other evidence of the work and life of black, female Canadian political figure. The Honourable Jean Augustine is notable for being the first African-Canadian woman elected as a Member of Parliament (MP) in the Canadian House of Commons (1993-2006) as well as the first such Cabinet Minister (Multiculturalism and Status of Women) under the Jean Chretien administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Nellie Mcclung: an Everyday Superwomen by Ariam Solomon
    Nellie McClung: An Everyday Superwomen By Ariam Solomon Nellie McClung is not only one of Alberta’s best heroines, but also one of the most empowering women of all time. In a time when women were seen as less than human, Nellie McClung did more than just change the law, she changed society’s perspective of women. She fought tooth and nail in the world of politics, a world dominated by men, to get the world to see women as nothing less than human beings. Born in Chatsworth, Ontario on October 20, 1873, as Nellie Letitia Mooney, she was one of six children born to John Mooney and Letitia McCurdy who would all move to a homestead in Souris Valley, Montreal in 1880. She would later get a job in 1889 teaching at the Hazel school at the young age of 16 despite the fact she hadn’t been going to school until the age of 10. She continued to teach until she married Robert Wesely Mcclung, a druggist who worked in Manitou, Manitoba, where she later became a prominent member of the Woman’s Christan Temperance Union of Canada. An organization that had Annie McClung, Nellie McClung's mother-in-law, as the provincial president. WCTU believed that alcohol abuse was the reason for unemployment, disease, sex work, poverty, violence against women and children, and immorality, they campaigned for the legal prohibition of all alcohol drinks. In 1898, a national vote was put forward where a majority of the voters voted in favour of prohibition leading WCTU and McClung to victory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persons' Case (1929) {The Famous Five: Henrietta Muir
    The Persons' Case (1929) {The Famous Five: Henrietta Muir Edwards, Nellie McClung, Louise McKinney, Emily Murphy and Irene Parlby}. Issue: Can a women hold the office of Senator? [The Canadian government said no, but put the matter before the courts. Question they put before Supreme Court Does the word "Persons" in section 24 of the British North America Act 1867, include female persons? The Supreme Court of Canada replied that the word "person" did not include female persons. Fortunately, for Canadian women, the Famous 5 were able to appeal to an even higher court, the British Privy Council. The question was duly submitted to them and on October 18, 1929 they overturned the decision of the Supreme Court by deciding that the word "person" did indeed include persons of the female gender. The word "person" always had a much broader meaning than its strict legal definition, and it therefore had been used to exclude women from university degrees, from voting, from entering the professions and from holding public office. The definition of "person" became a threshold test of women's equality. Only when Canadian women had been legally recognized as persons could they gain access to public life. After 1929, the door was open for women to lobby for further changes to achieve equality. As women across Canada can confirm today, that struggle continues. The 1929 Persons' Case is one of the major achievements by Canadians for Canadians. The Famous 5 succeeded in having women defined as "persons" in Section 24 of the British North America Act and thereby, eligible for appointment to the Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Famous Five and the "Persons Case"
    THE FAMOUS FIVE AND THE "PERSONS CASE" As BPW women, we must always remember our sisters who came before us, and the struggles they faced so that women could be where they are today. In 2004, on the 75th anniversary of the “Persons” case, long-time BPW member Kathy Laing, now a BPW Virtual club member in Ottawa, wrote this article about the Famous Five and the “Persons Case”. By Kathy Laing, BPW Virtual In 1997 Francis Wright of Calgary (now President and CEO of the Famous Five Foundation) set up a foundation to raise funds for the commissioning and creation of monuments commemorating the success of the Famous 5 and the Persons Case. She succeeded in her efforts and sculptor Barbara Paterson winner of the monument contest created five individual high bronze sculptures. The first sculptures were unveiled in Calgary at the Olympic Plaza on October 18th, 1999 with plans underway for the second sculptures to be unveiled on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on October 18th, 2000. As many of you know only statues of Prime Ministers and Royal persons had been allowed on the Hill but through the efforts of parliamentarians and senators an exception was made for the Famous Five. In January 2004, a small notice appeared in the Ottawa Citizen newspaper inviting interested women to a meeting of the Ottawa Committee of the Famous Five Foundation so I decided to attend. The Ottawa Committee was formed to assist in the arrangements for the unveiling of the statues on Parliament Hill. Subsequent to attending the first few meetings, I was asked by then-President Margaret Pronyk (now deceased) to represent BPW Canada at further meetings and associated events.
    [Show full text]
  • PEI's Famous Five
    Celebrating PEI’s Famous 5 Another Famous Five? Most of us know about, or have at least heard of, Canada’s Famous Five - the five Alberta women who were the petitioners in the Persons Case. That case was brought before the Supreme Court of Canada in 1927 and later decided in 1929 by the Judicial Council of Britain’s Privy Council. It deemed women as persons in the eyes of the law. The women - Emily Murphy, Henrietta Muir Edwards, Nellie McClung, Louise Crummy McKinney and Irene Parlby - worked for many years in various campaigns, and gained national and international attention as advocates for women’s rights. But who are the women of Prince Edward Island’s Famous 5? Who Are the PEI Famous 5? In 1993, Her Honour Lieutenant Governor Marion L. Reid, Hon. Premier Catherine Callbeck, Leader of the Official Opposition Pat Mella, Speaker of the Legislative Assembly of Prince Edward Island Nancy Guptill, and Deputy Leader of the Legislative Assembly Hon. Elizabeth ‘Libbe’ Hubley became known as PEI’s Famous 5. Left to right, Guptill, Reid, Mella, Callbeck, and Hubley, were seasoned political veterans, each having worked behind the scenes for their respective parties, and each having served in in the Legislative Assembly. They were the first – and to date only - women to simultaneously hold the top five positions of political influence in the province. It was a first in PEI and in Canada, and has not since been replicated elsewhere in the country. Hon. Marion L. Reid: Lieutenant Governor By the time the photo was taken in 1993, Hon.
    [Show full text]