UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
Meaning in Motion
Groenendijk, J.A.G.; Stokhof, M.J.B.
Publication date 2000 Document Version Submitted manuscript Published in Reference and Anaphorical Relations
Link to publication
Citation for published version (APA): Groenendijk, J. A. G., & Stokhof, M. J. B. (2000). Meaning in Motion. In K. von Heusinger, & U. Egli (Eds.), Reference and Anaphorical Relations (pp. 47-76). Kluwer.
General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons).
Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible.
UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)
Download date:25 Sep 2021 Meaning in Motion
Jeroen Groenendijk & Martin Stokhof ILLC/Department of Philosophy Faculty of Humanities University of Amsterdam
Abstract The paper sketches the place of dynamic semantics within a broader picture of developments in philosophical and linguistic theories of mean- ing. Some basic concepts of dynamic semantics are illustrated by means of a detailed analysis of anaphoric de nite and inde nite descrip- tions, which are treated as contextually dependent quanti cational ex- pressions. It is shown how a dynamic view sheds new light on the contextual nature of interpretation, on the di erence between mono- logue and dialogue, and on the interplay between direct and indirect information.
1 The development of formal semantics
The rst impetus towards a formal semantics in the modern sense of the word was given in the works of Frege, Russell, and Wittgenstein. There is a clear link between in particular the works of Frege and modern intensional (‘possible worlds’) semantics, a link which was forged in the fties and sixties by Carnap, Church, Hintikka, Kripke, and others. The rst systematic ap- plications of intensional semantics in the analysis of natural language appear in the works of Kaplan, Lewis, and in particular Montague, at the beginning of the seventies. A new eld of research emerged which still ourishes today, albeit no longer in the form of ‘orthodox’ Montague grammar. Parallel to this development, but for a long time independent of it, quite di erent advances were made in the philosophy of language, which now are beginning to penetrate into formal semantics. Dynamic semantics can be