Simple Users' Guide to the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Simple Users' Guide to the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point SHORT REVIEWS Simple users’ guide to the hazard analysis critical control point concept for the control of food microbiological safety T. Mayes A simple guide to the application of the hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) system for microbiological hazards is described which clearly outlines the rules to be followed for the identification and management of critical control points. The use of this guide will assist those persons or companies considering applying HACCP to understand precisely what the HACCP system is and how it should be used, as well as assisting those already applying HACCP analysis to standardize and formalize their approach. Keywords: hazard analysis critical control point; microbiological safet) The hazard analysis critical control point (HACCP) This paper outlines a simple user’s guide to the concept is a systematic approach to the identification application of the HACCP concept. The paper is not and assessment of microbiological hazards and risks intended to be a definitive guide, but rather a simple associated with the manufacture, distribution and use introduction to its basic application. For a full history of of a particular foodstuff. The concept was first pre- the development of the HACCP concept, a more sented in 1971 (APHA, 1972), initially for microbio- detailed discussion of its mechanics and illustrations of logical hazards, and has been applied extensively in the its application, the references cited herein should be food service and food manufacturing sectors (Bauman, consulted. 1974; 1990; Munce, 1984; Peterson and Gunnerson, 1974; Bryan er al., 1981; Warne et al., 1985; Snyder, 1986; Bryan, 1988). The initial development and METHODOLOGY application of the technique began in North America, but the concept has now become increasingly accepted What is the HACCP concept? by the UK foods industry and by reputable internat- ional bodies of scientists eminent in food microbiology The accepted definition of the HACCP concept is: ‘a as the most effective approach to the control of systematic approach to the identification and assess- foodborne disease. Despite this, progress in applying ment of the microbiological hazards and risks associ- the concept throughout the food industry in the UK ated with the manufacture, distribution and use of a and Europe has been relatively slow, due in part to the particular foodstuff and the definition of means for absence of a simple user’s guide to the application, of their control’ (ICMSF, 1988). the technique. It is worth noting that HACCP analysis The HACCP analysis consists of six steps (ICMSF, is specifically mentioned in the draft enforcement 1988): Codes of Practice being progressed under the UK Food 1. Identification of hazards and assessment of the Safety Act 1990 and this could stimulate increasing severity of those hazards and their risks associated European interest. with the growing, harvesting, processing or manu- facture, distribution, preparation and/or use of a raw material or final product. Unilcvcr Rcscarch Laboratory, Colworth House. Sharn- 2. Determination of critical control points (CCPs) at brook, Bedfordshirc MK44 ILQ, UK which hazards can be controlled. A CCP may be a 14 Food Control - January 1992 0956-7135/92/010014-06 0 1992 Butterworth-Hememann Ltd User’s guide to HACCP concept: T. Mayes raw material, or a location, practice, procedure or with particular micro-organisms or groups of organ- process stage. isms considered as the potential hazards to each Specification of criteria (i.e. limits and tolerances) product or group of products. For example, typical that indicate whether an operation is under control terms of reference for three different studies may be: at a CCP. (I) listeria (infectious pathogen) as a potential hazard Establishment and implementation of procedures in soft cheese; (2) Clostridium botulinum (an anaerobic to monitor that each CCP operates under con- toxin-forming spore former) as a potential hazard in trol. vacuum-packed chill-stored smoked trout; and (3) Identification of any corrective action required Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxin (an aerobic toxin when a CCP operates ‘out of control’. former) in dry pasta. Verification, i.e. the use of additional information It is preferable to select specific hazards (e.g. to ensure that the HACCP system is working. salmonella or staphylococcal enterotoxin) for each study as this will allow the definition of specific For reasons of brevity and clarity, this paper will controls. Each potential microbiological hazard must discuss the basic use of HACCP analyasis and will be chosen after taking into account the use of the therefore cover only steps l-4 of the above. product by the consumer, (e.g. in the three examples HACCP analysis is a management technique. It given, normal consumer use would not destroy the allows the systematic examination of all the many microbial hazard if it were present in the final product. processing steps involved in the preparation and use of The study team must have a clear view on the types and a food product, and allows the identification of the levels of hazard (e.g. salmonella, C. botulinum, S. processes or operations that are critical to the safety of aureus) that are regarded as dangerous to the consumer. the product. Many commercial food processes involve over 50 different stages from raw material production Analysis or acquisition to final product use. HACCP analysis allows management to identify the stages (typically The first step is to audit the entire process under study between five and ten) that are critical to the safety of to produce a flow diagram of the process that can be the product and therefore allows managers to concen- used as the basis for the study. trate technical resources to ensure that the critical Audits must be carried out by closely following operations are adequately controlled. actual processing operations. Effective auditing tech- A proper HACCP study will produce a list of niques which structure data collection have already potential hazards and corresponding CCPs, together been described (Mayes and Kilsby, 1989), but whatever with operating limits and monitoring procedures for auditing technique is used, the flow diagram arising each CCP. The HACCP technique is equally applicable from the audit data should contain as a minimum, to the identification and control of microbiological, details of all raw materials used, all processing and chemical, or foreign body hazards. packaging stages and a complete time-temperature A HACCP study should ideally be carried out as part history throughout the process and distribution, of a product and process development brief so that together with data on pHIA, conditions and other potential hazards can be identified and ‘designed out’ at parameters affecting growth, survival, death, or pos- the beginning of the project and should be repeated sible contamination. Additional data such as the before any significant changes are made to product or hygienic design characteristics of equipment and hold- process conditions. up volumes should also be collected. Data must also be This paper describes the basic application of HACCP collected on the instructions for the use of the product analysis. Once people are familiar with the application by consumers. Once such a flow diagram is available it of the basic philosophy, a more detailed analysis may be used by the study team to identify where involving the quantification of risk, concern ranking of hazards can be introduced into the product and the hazards, CCPl/CCP2 ranking, product abuse situations associated CCPs that will minimize the risk or prevent and HAZOP hazard analysis can be considered the hazard from occurring. (ICMSF, 1988; Mayes and Kilsby, 1989). This is best carried out as a team activity. The nominated study team leader should proceed through The hazard analysis study team and its terms of the entire process, using the audit data as a guide, and reference ask a series of questions at each stage to determine: (1) if the hazard under study (e.g. salmonella) can be A HACCP study will require the acquisition and introduced into the product either via raw materials or evaluation of technical data and, as a minimum, the processing or can be allowed to grow to dangerous study should be carried out by a microbiologist or other levels; (2) if the formulation or composition of the raw appropriate specialist who is an expert in the particular materials or product is essential to the safety of the operation. However, it is much more preferable to product; and (3) if the processes are specifically establish a hazard analysis study team consisting of a rendering the raw materials, intermediate product, or process manager or supervisor responsible for the final product safe by removing, inhibiting, or prevent- process in question, an engineer, a quality assurance ing contamination and/or growth of the hazard under manager and the microbiologist. The use of such a discussion to dangerous levels. multidisciplinary study team will greatly improve the A consideration of the hazards should take into decisions made by the group. account realistic potential process deviations e.g. high- The terms of reference for the study must be defined er or lower product times and temperatues, pH and A, clearly at the outset and the detail must be confirmed values, and the amount and distribution of any preser- by the study team. Each study should be carried out vative. Consideration should also be given to the Food Control - January 1992 15 User’s guide to HACCP concept: T. Mayes For each raw material used: Question 1 (and if necessary Question 2) for each raw 01. Could the raw material material used. realisticallycontain Question 1. Could the raw material realistically the hazard under study YES - kg. salmonella) at - NO contain the hazard under study at levels dangerous to levek dangeroustq the consumer? the consumer? The study team should use whatever data is available REPEAT FOR REMAINING RAW to them, e.g.
Recommended publications
  • Good Manufacturing Practices and Industry Best Practices for Peanut
    GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES AND INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES FOR PEANUT PRODUCT MANUFACTURERS Revised October 2009 The American Peanut Council 1500 King Street, Suite 301 Alexandria, Virginia _____________________________________________________________ Any reproduction of the information contained in this document requires the express written consent of the American Peanut Council, 1500 King Street, Suite 301, Alexandria, Virginia 22314. Contents DEFINITION OF TERMS .............................................................................................................................. 3 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................... 5 GOOD MANUFACTURING PRACTICES ................................................................................................... 7 Personnel Practices ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Establishing a Training Program .............................................................................................................. 8 Educate workers on the importance of proper hand washing techniques ................................................. 8 Building and Facilities ................................................................................................................................. 9 Plants and Grounds ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Food Safety/Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System
    Food Safety/Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) System History ● Section 111 of the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004 (Public Law 108- 265) amended Section 9(h) of the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act by requiring SFAs to implement a food safety program for the preparation and service of school meals served to children in the school year beginning July 1, 2005. The program must be based on HACCP principles and conform to guidance issued by USDA. All SFAs must have had a fully implemented food safety program no later than the end of the 2005- 2006 school year. (Reference USDA Guidance on Developing a School Food Safety Program Based on the Process Approach to HACCP Principles—June 2005). ● HACCP is a systematic approach to construct a food safety program designed to reduce the risk of foodborne hazards by focusing on each step of the food production process— receiving, storing, preparing, cooking, cooling, reheating, holding, assembling, packaging, transporting, and serving. The purpose of a school food safety program is to ensure the delivery of safe foods to children in the school meals program by controlling hazards that may occur or be introduced into foods anywhere along the flow of the food from receiving to service (food flow). ● There are two types of hazards: (1) ones specific to the preparation of the food, such as improper cooking for the specific type of food (beef, chicken, eggs, etc.) and (2) nonspecific ones that affect all foods, such as poor personal hygiene. Specific hazards are controlled by identifying CCPs and implementing measures to control the occurrence or introduction of those hazards.
    [Show full text]
  • Generic Haccp Model for Poultry Slaughter
    GENERIC HACCP MODEL FOR POULTRY SLAUGHTER Developed: June 18-20, 1996 Kansas City, Missouri Submitted to USDA, Food Safety and Inspection Service by the International Meat and Poultry HACCP Alliance on September 9, 1996 Poultry Slaughter Model TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Introduction ............................................................................. 2 Seven Principles of HACCP.......................................................... 3 Specifics About this Generic Model ................................................. 4 Using this Generic Model to Develop and Implement a HACCP Program ..... 6 Process Category Description......................................................... 9 Product Categories and Ingredients..................................................10 Flow Chart .............................................................................11 Hazard Analysis Worksheet ..........................................................17 HACCP Worksheet ....................................................................23 Examples of Record-Keeping Forms ................................................32 Appendix 1 (21 CFR Part 110).......................................................39 Appendix 2 (Process Categories).....................................................49 Appendix 3 (Overview of Hazards) ..................................................51 Appendix 4 (NACMCF Decision Tree) ............................................. 53 Appendix 5 (References) .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Generic HACCP Model for Raw, Ground Meat and Poultry Products" Or "Generic HACCP Model for Raw, Not Ground Meat and Poultry Products" Models Will Be Most Useful
    Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................1 Principles of HACCP Principle No. 1....................................................................1 Principle No. 2....................................................................1 Principle No. 3....................................................................1 Principle No. 4....................................................................1 Principle No. 5....................................................................1 Principle No. 6....................................................................1 Principle No. 7....................................................................1 Definitions.................................................................................2 Corrective action..................................................................2 Criterion...........................................................................2 Critical Control Point (CCP).....................................................2 Critical limit.......................................................................2 Deviation..........................................................................2 HACCP............................................................................2 HACCP Plan......................................................................2 HACCP System...................................................................2 Hazard Analysis...................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Good Manufacturing Practices For
    Good Manufacturing Practices for Fermented Dry & Semi-Dry Sausage Products by The American Meat Institute Foundation October 1997 ANALYSIS OF MICROBIOLOGICAL HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH DRY AND SEMI-DRY SAUSAGE PRODUCTS Staphylococcus aureus The Microorganism Staphylococcus aureus is often called "staph." It is present in the mucous membranes--nose and throat--and on skin and hair of many healthy individuals. Infected wounds, lesions and boils are also sources. People with respiratory infections also spread the organism by coughing and sneezing. Since S. aureus occurs on the skin and hides of animals, it can contaminate meat and by-products by cross-contamination during slaughter. Raw foods are rarely the source of staphylococcal food poisoning. Staphylococci do not compete very well with other bacteria in raw foods. When other competitive bacteria are removed by cooking or inhibited by salt, S. aureus can grow. USDA's Nationwide Data Collection Program for Steers and Heifers (1995) and Nationwide Pork Microbiological Baseline Data Collection Program: Market Hogs (1996) reported that S. aureus was recovered from 4.2 percent of 2,089 carcasses and 16 percent of 2,112 carcasses, respectively. Foods high in protein provide a good growth environment for S. aureus, especially cooked meat/meat products, poultry, fish/fish products, milk/dairy products, cream sauces, salads with ham, chicken, potato, etc. Although salt or sugar inhibit the growth of some microorganisms, S. aureus can grow in foods with low water activity, i.e., 0.86 under aerobic conditions or 0.90 under anaerobic conditions, and in foods containing high concentrations of salt or sugar. S.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Microbial Data for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Veri®Cationðfood and Drug Administration Perspective
    810 Journal of Food Protection, Vol. 63, No. 6, 2000, Pages 810±814 Use of Microbial Data for Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Veri®cationÐFood and Drug Administration Perspective JOHN E. KVENBERG* AND DARRELL J. SCHWALM Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, HFS-601, 200 C Street S.W., Washington, D.C. 20204, USA MS 99-501: Received 3 September 1999/Accepted 4 February 2000 Downloaded from http://meridian.allenpress.com/jfp/article-pdf/63/6/810/1673832/0362-028x-63_6_810.pdf by guest on 24 September 2021 ABSTRACT This paper examines the role that the microbiologist and microbiological testing play in implementing hazard analysis and critical control point (HACCP) programs. HACCP offers a more comprehensive and science-based alternative for con- trolling food safety hazards compared with traditional sanitation programs based upon good manufacturing practices. Con- trolling hazards under an HACCP program requires a systematic assemblage of reliable data relating to the occurrence, elimination, prevention, and reduction of hazards. These data need to be developed in a transparent environment that will ensure that the best scienti®c methodologies have been employed in developing the needed data. The two mechanisms used in HACCP to assess the adequacy of the database are validation studies and the veri®cation assessments. Microbiological testing is an important mechanism for collecting data used in developing and implementing an HACCP plan. Microbial sample data can help establish standard operating procedures (SOPs) for sanitation, assess the likelihood of the occurrence of hazards, establish critical limits, and assess the validity of the HACCP plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Codex Alimentarius in the Twenty-First Century
    C O D E X A L I M E N T A R I U S www.codexalimentarius.net Third edition The Codex Alimentarius is a collection of international food standards that have been adopted by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex standards cover all the main foods, whether processed, semi-processed or raw. In addition, materials used in the further processing of food products are included to the extent necessary for achieving the principal objectives of the code – UNDERSTANDING protecting the health of consumers and facilitating fair practices in the food trade. Codex provisions concern the hygienic and nutritional quality of food, including microbiological norms, food additives, pesticide and veterinary drug residues, contaminants, labelling and presentation, and methods of sampling and risk analysis. THE CODEX ALIMENTARIUS As well as individual standards, advisory codes of practice, guidelines and other recommended measures form an important part of the overall food code. The Codex Alimentarius can safely claim to be the most important international reference point in matters concerning food quality. Its creation, moreover, has generated food-related scientific research and greatly increased the world community's awareness of the vital issues at stake – food quality, safety and public health. ISBN 978-92-5-105614-1 9 7 8 9 2 5 1 0 5 6 1 4 1 TC/M/A0850E/1/11.06/5100 For further information on the activities of the Codex Alimentarius Commission, please contact: Secretariat of the Codex Alimentarius Commission Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme Food
    [Show full text]
  • The Application of Good Manufacturing Practices As a Quality Approach to Food Safety in a Food Manufacturing Establishment in the Western Cape South Africa
    The application of Good Manufacturing Practices as a quality approach to food safety in a food manufacturing establishment in the Western Cape South Africa by Macceline Bih Ngwa Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Master of Engineering in Quality in the Faculty of Engineering at the Cape Peninsula University of Technology Supervisor: Prof S Bosman Bellville Campus Date submitted August 2017 CPUT copyright information The dissertation may not be published either in part (in scholarly, scientific or technical journals), or as a whole (as a monograph), unless permission has been obtained from the University. DECLARATION I, Macceline Ngwa, declare that the contents of this dissertation/thesis represent my own unaided work, and that the dissertation/thesis has not previously been submitted for academic examination towards any qualification. Furthermore, it represents my own opinions and not necessarily those of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology. August 2017 Signed Date ii ABSTRACT Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) is a segment of quality assurance which guarantees that food products produced are uniform and controlled to the appropriate quality standards for their required use and as expected by the marketing authority. A survey was carried out to assess the awareness and implementation level of GMP guidelines amongst manufacturers in the Western Cape, South Africa. Based on a literature review on GMP in the food manufacturing establishments a research problem was identified forming the crux of the research which reads as follows: “the lack of enforcement of approved standards within the food manufacturing establishments in the Western Cape Province, South Africa may result in the food product quality being questioned by consumers”.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point Principles and Application Guidelines
    HAZARD ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL CONTROL POINT PRINCIPLES AND APPLICATION GUIDELINES ADOPTED August 14, 1997 NATIONAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON MICROBIOLOGICAL CRITERIA FOR FOODS 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................. 4 DEFINITIONS............................................................................................................... 6 HACCP PRINCIPLES.................................................................................................... 8 GUIDELINES FOR APPLICATION OF HACCP PRINCIPLES.................................... 9 Introduction......................................................................................................... 9 Prerequisite Programs.......................................................................................... 9 Education and Training......................................................................................... 10 Developing a HACCP Plan................................................................................... 10 Assemble the HACCP team....................................................................... 11 Describe the food and its distribution........................................................ 12 Describe the intended use and consumers of the food................................ 12 Develop a flow diagram which describes the process................................ 12 Verify the flow diagram...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • (HACCP) System in a Poultry Processing Plant
    Implementation of Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) System in a Poultry Processing Plant BY Amel Mohammed Abdalla Mohammed B. Sc. of Veterinary Science University of Khartoum September 2000 This thesis is submitted to the University of Khartoum in Partial fulfillment for the degree of Master of Veterinary Science Supervisor Prof. Suliman Mohamed El Sanousi Department of Microbiology Faculty of Veterinary Medicine University of Khartoum January 2008 1 PREFACE The work described in this thesis was carried out in the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Khartoum under the supervision of Professor Suliman Mohamed El Sanousi. The material presented is original and has not been submitted to any other University. 2 DEDICATION To the soul of my father and brother Esam And sincerely to my husband Emad, my little angle Yusr And My family For their tremendous support, encouragement and patience Amel 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First of all, my thanks and praise are due to almighty Allah, the beneficent and the merciful, for giving me the health and strength to complete this work. Then I which to express my indebtedness and sincere thankfulness to my supervisor prof. Suliman Mohamed El Sanousi, for his guidance, continuous encouragement and his kindness with me. I wish to thank prof. Mona Elagab for her encouragement and help. Sincere and faithful thanks are due to Dr. Awad Sukrab the Director, Technical Adminectretion, in SSMO for unlimited help and advice. Also I wish to thank Dr. Omer Abdalla Laboratory Manager in SSMO for help and provision of some relevant literature. Thanks to the staff of microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Fawzia, Mona, M., A/ziz and laboratory workers Abdalla, Abd Elazeem, Seed, and Hassan.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Use of Haccp for Control Salmonella Safety in Meat
    International Journal of Education and Research Vol. 1 No. 1 January 2013 USE OF HACCP FOR CONTROL SALMONELLA SAFETY IN MEAT AND MEAT FOOD EHSAN MAJD(1) AND SEDIGHEH MEHRABIAN*(2) 1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Bioscience, North branch of Tehran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran ABSTRACT The present study was carried out from 400 samples removed from the lines in commercial processing plants and slaughterhouses at different stages of CCPs such as slaughtering, flaying, empting interior, washing and colding for raw meat, selecting raw ingredients, spicing, bagging, cooking, colding and rebagging for roast beef, selecting raw ingredients such as raw meat ,raw materials and spices, blending, fermenting, making dry and bagging for sausages fermentive meat at different slaughterhouses and plants during 2009:10 to report the effect of processing steps in an effective HACCP program on microbial populations ,including Salmonella in Tehran . Salmonella was isolated from samples of chicken ,beef, veal, mutton, roast beef and sausages fermentive meat collected at slaughterhouses and plants. The isolates were characterized by biochemical reactions and serotyping. Eighty isolates of Salmonella were obtained with an overall prevalence of 20%. Seventy percent of strains (56 cases of 80 samples )were isolated in CCP2 and 30% of strains (24 cases of 80 samples ) were isolated in CCP1.During one year of HACCP implementation in this study to control Salmonella contamination overall bacterial populations decreased due to processing .In this study flaying and empting interior stages were the most important points of contamination (CCP2). 1 Ehsan Majd & Sedigheh Mehrabian However, the national incidence of poultry product contamination with Salmonella has declined since adoption of the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) food safety program .Further reductions in carcasses contamination may require other approaches such as the adaptation of on-farm pathogen reduction strategies .
    [Show full text]
  • HACCP in the Meat and Poultry Industry
    HACCP in the meat and poultry industry R.B. Tompkin An international consensus now existsfor the principles of HACCP and how they should be implemented. The relative roles of industry and regulatory agencies has been described. A generic flow diagram is outlined and briefly discussed. A questionnaire for use in HACCP verification is provided. A rationale is suggested for determining when HACCP should be mandatory. The transitionfrom theory to practice and regulatory involvement raises a variety of issues, some of which are discussed. Keywords: HACCP; poultry industry INTRODUCTION HACCP combines prevention with detection at the steps in the food chain where food safety problems are An international consensus has been reached on the most likely to occur. In the event that cohtrol is lost at a basic principles of HACCP and how they should be critical control point (CCP) it will be detected so that implemented. A consensus has also been reached on approriate corrective actions can be taken to prevent the definition of hazard. This is important because the unsafe food from reaching consumers (Tompkin, term ‘hazard’ defines the scope of HACCP. The 1992). Widespread adoption of HACCP by the meat current Codex definition of hazard is ‘the potential to and poultry industry should enhance consumer confi- cause harm. Hazards can be biological, chemical or dence in its products and reduce barriers to inter- physical’ (Codex, 1993~). This definition clearly places national trade. the focus of HACCP on food safety. The meat and poultry industry can, derive several Universal acceptance of HACCP is very important to benefits through the application of HACCP.
    [Show full text]