DOCSLIB.ORG

Infrastructure Delivery Plan June 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Infrastructure Delivery Plan June 2012 Wokingham Borough Council Proposed Submission Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (Local Plan) (MDD DPD) INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY PLAN JUNE 2012 Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Proposed submission Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD) June 2012 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) seeks to ensure that Local Plans plan positively for the development and infrastructure required in the area to meet the objectives, principles, and policies of the NPPF. 1.2 The Borough’s Local Development Framework includes the Core Strategy and Proposed Submission Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD). These are the Local Plans for the Borough. 1.3 Wokingham Borough’s spatial strategy, which reflects the Council’s Sustainable Community Strategy, is set out in the adopted Core Strategy (January 2010). The Core Strategy was found sound following an independent Examination in Public in 2009. The Core Strategy identifies four Strategic Development Locations (SDLs) which will meet the majority of the Borough’s housing requirements to 2026. Policies CP18, Arborfield Garrison SDL, CP19 South of M4 SDL, CP20 North Wokingham SDL and CP21 South Wokingham SDL and Appendix 7 of the Core Strategy set out the strategic and local infrastructure requirements necessary to develop these areas as sustainable communities. 1.4 Further guidance on this approach and how the infrastructure set out in Policies CP18-CP21 and Appendix 7 should be provided is set out in the Council’s adopted Infrastructure Delivery and Contributions Supplementary Planning Documents for the Strategic Development Locations (SPD) (October 2010 and October 2011). 1.5 The Core Strategy and the Infrastructure Delivery and Contributions SPDs were subject to independent viability testing and the approaches were found to be viable. 1.6 The Core Strategy states that sites to meet the remaining housing requirement outside of the SDLs would be allocated in the MDD DPD. The MDD DPD identifies sites to meet the remainder of the housing requirement outside of the SDLs and to ensure a rolling 5 year housing land supply. 1.7 The MDD DPD identifies sites for the delivery of around 840 dwellings to 2026 with allocated reserve sites of around 135 dwellings. The MDD DPD in Policy SAL03: Allocated reserve housing sites, makes it clear that reserve sites would not be released until after 1 April 2026 unless the Council accepts that the overall dwelling requirement for 13,230 net additional dwellings within the Borough between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2026 is unlikely to be achieved; there is a deficit in the 5 year rolling housing land supply, or an approved Neighbourhood Plan confirms that residential development of an allocated reserve site can occur before 1 April 2026. 1.8 Appendix 12 of the MDD DPD sets out some of the specific requirements associated with sites allocated in the MDD DPD. Any application for development will also need to ensure it accords with all relevant policies in 2 Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Proposed submission Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD) June 2012 the Development Plan, including parking provision, provision of open space and dwelling mix. The requirements set out reflect infrastructure requirements currently sought on this type of development through the Council’s Planning Advice Note on Infrastructure Impact Mitigation Contributions for New Development (revised 2010). As such the requirements should not impact on the viability of delivering sites allocated. There may be more specific contributions required from some allocated sites where there is a need for that site to contribute to a specific scheme set out in the Core Strategy or the MDD DPD. For example sites allocated within Wokingham Town Centre may need to contribute to the provision of the Station Link Road. 1.9 In bringing sites forward regard will need to be given to Core Strategy Policy CP4 Infrastructure Requirements which states: “Planning permission will not be granted unless appropriate arrangements for the improvement or provision of infrastructure, services, community, and other facilities required for the development taking account of the cumulative impact of schemes are agreed. Arrangements for provision or improvement to the required standard will be secured by planning obligations or condition if appropriate”. This will be particularly relevant in areas where there are a number of sites within close proximity. 1.10 The Infrastructure Delivery Plan (IDP) for the MDD DPD forms part of the evidence base and seeks to identify the infrastructure implications and requirements of the growth identified in the MDD DPD. The IDP is a live document, and will be used to inform the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Charging Schedule. Proposals for development will make appropriate provision for the infrastructure, services, resources and amenities set out in the Council’s Planning Advice Note on Infrastructure Impact Mitigation Contributions for New Development, Supplementary Planning Documents, and/or the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) Charging Schedule. Provision may also be secured through planning obligations (Section 106 contributions) in line with Regulation 122 of the Community Infrastructure Levy Regulations 2010. 1.11 In preparing the Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the MDD DPD the Council has sought information from a range of sources, including service providers within the Council such as education, transport housing, and leisure and from external organisations such as the Primary Care Trust, Utilities, Police, Fire and Rescue. The Council has also undertaken work with Parish and Town Councils regarding local infrastructure needs . 3 Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Proposed submission Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD) June 2012 2.0 Infrastructure Requirements 2.1 This section provides an overview of the physical, and social and community and green Infrastructure requirements which will be required through the development proposed in the MDD DPD. 2.2 Physical Infrastructure Water Supply & Waste Water Lead Thames Water Utilities Ltd Organisation(s) South East Water Office of Water Services (Ofwat) Main Sources Thames Water Strategic Direction Statement ‘Taking care of Information of water, the next 25 years’ 2010 - 2035 Thames Water Business Plan 2010 - 2015 ‘Our Plans for 2010 – 2015’ Thames Water Water Resources Management Plan 2010 - 2015 Thames Water Draft Drought Plan 2011 South East Water Strategic Direction Statement 2007 South East Water Business Plan 2010 - 2015 ‘Future Plans 2010 – 2015’ South East Water Water Resources Management Plan 2010 - 2035 South East Water Final Draft Drought Plan 2007 Water Resources Strategy for England and Wales (Environment Agency, 2009) Existing Water Supply Provision Thames Water and South East Water are responsible for water supply and supply infrastructure in the Borough. Generally, Thames Water is responsible for the north western part of the Borough with South East Water is responsible for the south eastern part. Thames Water’s water supply area in the Borough is divided between the Kennet Valley and Henley Water Resource Zones (WRZs). South East Water’s water supply area in the Borough is 4 Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Proposed submission Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD) June 2012 area RZ4. Thames Water, Kennet Valley and Henley WRZ The Kennet Valley WRZ has recently benefitted from an upgrade to the water treatment works to enable more water to be treated. Kennet Valley and Henley WRZs are forecasted to maintain a surplus over the planning period 2009 – 2035. This surplus will gradually decline as demand grows and planning uncertainties increase. South East Water, RZ4 RZ4 has a surplus in supply in the early years of the planning period 2010 – 2035. Once this surplus has been removed by forecast increases in demand, it is proposed to transfer existing surplus supply in RZ5 to RZ4 via the existing Inter-Resource Zone transfer between the Zones. Wastewater and Sewerage Thames Water owns and operates the public wastewater and sewerage system and treatment works. Existing Sewerage Works: • Easthampstead Park sewage works, which discharges treated water into Emm Brook, which discharges treated water into Ashridge Stream • Wokingham sewage works, which discharges treated water into Ashridge Stream • Wargrave Sewerage Treatment Works Thames Water’s five year plan, from 2010-2015, sets out proposals to maintain and improve their services during that period. This is their business plan that is submitted Ofwat, outlining future investment priorities and the likely cost. Thames Water has confirmed that there are no specific plans in this period to upgrade the Sewage Treatment Works in Wokingham. The level of growth from the sites proposed to be allocated in the MDD DPD does not pose an issue with regard to ongoing provision of sewage treatment. However, Thames Water has indicated that future phasing of growth may be required in order that growth does not occur at a greater rate than the Sewerage Treatment Works (STW) could accommodate. 5 Infrastructure Delivery Plan for the Proposed submission Managing Development Delivery Development Plan Document (MDD DPD) June 2012 Planned Provision Water and Waste Water Statutory water undertakers (Thames Water and South East Water) have a duty to maintain the security of water supply and every five
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Bradfield College Campus Development Framework Transport Appraisal
    BRADFIELD COLLEGE CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK TRANSPORT APPRAISAL 13 February 2019 Our Ref: DA/AW/JG/lh/adf/JNY9598-01i RPS 20 Western Avenue Milton Park Abingdon Oxon OX14 4SH Tel: 01235 432190 Fax: 01235 834698 Email: [email protected] rpsgroup.com/uk QUALITY MANAGEMENT Prepared by: Amy Waites / Joanna Gunn Authorised by: David Archibald Date: 13 February 2019 Project Number/Document JNY9598-01i Reference: COPYRIGHT © RPS The material presented in this report is confidential. This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of Bradfield College and shall not be distributed or made available to any other company or person without the knowledge and written consent of RPS. rpsgroup.com/uk CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 1 2 CAMPUS LAYOUT AND PUPIL DESIRE LINES .................................................................................. 2 3 SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT BASELINE AND SURVEYS ................................................................. 6 4 TRANSPORT RELATED POLICIES .................................................................................................... 17 5 KEY PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................................. 21 6 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................................... 27 FIGURES FIGURE 1 – SITE LOCATION FIGURE 2 – CAMPUS LAYOUT APPENDICES
    [Show full text]
  • Earley Town Guide 2017-2019
    EARLEY TOWN GUIDE 2017-2019 including street map & index Earley Town Guide 2017-18 1 DON’T MISS YOUR LAST OPPORTUNITY TO BUY Last few remaining Parklands is a charming collection of townhouses, located in the leafy Berkshire suburb of Earley. This stunning development offers exquisite and desirable family homes with large living areas and elegant en-suites. Shopping, restaurants and pubs nearby • Ideal for commuters with rail and road links • 4 miles from the centre of Reading • Help to Buy available on all homes 4 bedroom homes £545,000 5 bedroom semi-detached homes £570,000 5 bedroom detached from £575,000 Marketing Suite and Show Home Open Daily 10am to 5pm Call 01189 669 742 Email [email protected] or visit www.bewley.co.uk COMING SOON: READING GATEWAY - A Stunning Collection of 1, 2, 3, and 4 bedroom homes. Register your interest now 0845 686 8600 2 Earley Town Guide 2017-18 Meeting rooms and halls for hire in Woodley Perfect for business meetings, community activities and social events Flexible spaces to suit your budget and your needs Discounts for Woodley residents and community groups On-site catering through Brown Bag café To book call 0118 969 0356 [email protected] The Oakwood Centre Headley Road, Woodley www.theoakwoodcentre.com You could be a foster carer Few things are as rewarding as fostering. If you think the boot might fit and you could make a difference to a local child or young person: Call 0118 974 6204, email [email protected], visit www.fostering.wokingham.gov.uk/ or Wokingham fostering for more information.
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Council Year Book
    WOKINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL YEAR BOOK 2018 / 2019 WOKINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL COAT OF ARMS Interpretation of the Arms The shield combines the principal topographical and historical features of the Borough. The main surface of the shield indicates the former, while the latter are represented in the top portion or "chief". Three white waves and two green ones, each resembling an initial W, suggest the undulating farmlands and rich woodlands enclosed by the Thames, Loddon and Blackwater rivers. The royal stag's head, similar to that in the arms of Windsor and that of the complete stag in the arms of Berkshire and Wokingham, refers to the situation of large parts of the Borough in the ancient Royal Forest of Windsor. In the chief, the pastoral staves refer to the Sees of Winchester and Salisbury, the former held the whole of the Hundred of Wargrave and the Bishop of Salisbury had a Palace at Sonning. The mitre refers to the mitred Abbey of Abingdon which has links with the Borough over a thousand years old, and to the ancient Saxon bishopric said to have existed at Sonning. The background is red, as is the upper part of the arms of Reading University, whose site is within the area at Earley. Above the shield is the closed helm proper to civic arms, with its decorative mantling or tournament cloak in the basic colour of the shield, green and white. Upon the helm stands the crest, the base of which is the special type designed for Rural Borough Councils and consisting of wheatears and acorns alternately, representing agriculture and natural beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7.0 M4 Junctions 3 to 12 Smart Motorway TR010019
    Safe roads, reliable journeys, informed travellers M4 junctions 3 to 12 smart motorway TR010019 7.3 Engineering and design report 5(2) (q) Revision 0 March 2015 Planning Act 2008 Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 Volume 7.0 Volume An executive agency of the Department for Transport HIGHWAYS AGENCY – M4 JUNCTIONS 3 TO 12 SMART MOTORWAY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Highways Agency (the "Agency") is making an application (the "Application") for development consent to improve the M4 motorway ("M4") to a smart motorway between junction 3 (Hayes) in west London and junction 12 (Theale), which is near Reading, (the "Scheme"). This Engineering and Design Report ("EDR") accompanies the Application and its purpose is to explain the design principles and design rationale for the Scheme. It describes how the design has been influenced by the technical and operational requirements of creating all-lane running and smart motorway infrastructure. It is similar to a Design and Access Statement ("DAS"), but provides additional Scheme-specific information beyond that usually provided for within a DAS. It also supports the environmental impact assessment of the Scheme. The Strategic Road Network ("SRN") in England comprises motorways and all-purpose trunk roads. The SRN is operated, maintained and improved in England by the Agency on behalf of the Secretary of State. The Agency is an executive agency of the Department for Transport (“DfT”). The M4 is the main strategic route between London and the west of England, and on to South Wales. The M4 currently suffers from heavy congestion between junctions 3 (Hayes) and 12 (Theale), which leads to unpredictable journey times.
    [Show full text]
  • Questions to the Mayor
    Written Answers to questions not answered at Mayor’s Question Time on 14 October 2009 South London Line Question No: 2651 / 2009 Jenny Jones Will you express your support for the retention of the South London rail service from Victoria to London Bridge via Denmark Hill, and oppose any reduction in this service that is carried out for financial reasons rather than capacity reasons? Oral response given Missing Updates Question No: 2932 / 2009 John Biggs Are there any unusual, novel, or contentious issues that have arisen since the last Mayor’s Question Time meeting, which you have failed to include in either your last written report or your oral update today? Oral response given Limousines and chauffeurs for the Met’s senior officers Question No: 2939 / 2009 Dee Doocey Following your comments at last months MQT, where you said that cars that ferry around Ministers, civil servants, and other people on the ‘taxpayer’s payroll’ should be got rid of, will you be taking action to abolish limousines and chauffeurs for senior MPS officers? Oral response given London Plan Question No: 3106 / 2009 Steve O’Connell What does the Mayor consider to be the most important aspects of the latest draft of the London Plan and how do they reflect his priorities for London? Oral response given 1 Young People Question No: 2745 / 2009 Joanne McCartney What recent initiatives have you delivered for young people in London? Oral response given Congestion Charge Question No: 3072 / 2009 Victoria Borwick Further to your answers to questions 3014/2008 and 1053/2009 on helping the retail economy the Mayor said he would re-look at bringing forward the post-Christmas Congestion Charge-free days to before Christmas.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Statement Next Generation Data (NGD)
    Data Centre 3 Transport Statement Next Generation Data (NGD) October 2020 Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely as information for Next Generation Data (NGD) and use in relation to Proposed Data Centre at Plot 4, Imperial Park, Marshfield, Newport, NP10 8BE Atkins Limited assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This document has 41 pages including the cover. Document history Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Draft to Client RM SL SF JP October 2020 Client signoff Client Next Generation Data (NGD) Project Data Centre 3 Job number 5197938 5197949-TS | 1.0 | October 2020 Atkins | NGD DC3 TS v1.0 Page 2 of 41 Contents Section Page Introduction 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1. Overview 6 1.2. Existing Site 6 1.3. Description of Development Proposals 6 1.4. Scoping Background 7 1.5. Report Structure 7 Transport Planning Policy and Review 8 2. Transport Planning Policy and Review 9 2.1. Introduction 9 2.2. National Policy 9 2.3. Regional Policy 11 2.4. Local Policy 12 Baseline Conditions 14 3. Baseline Conditions 15 3.1. Introduction 15 3.2. Existing Site and Location 15 3.3. Surrounding Road Network 16 3.4. Site Accessibility by Active Travel and Public Transport 17 3.5. Accident History 18 Development Proposals 20 4. Development Proposals 21 4.1. Introduction 21 4.2. Development Description 21 4.3. Access 22 4.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Survey the Old Lawn Tennis Club
    Preliminary Ecological Appraisal Survey The Old Lawn Tennis Club Land between No 38 and 40 Silver Fox Crescent Woodley Reading Berkshire RG5 3JA Paul Brown of Browns Ltd Status Issue Name Date Draft 1 Paul Moon BA (Hons) Ecological Consultant 05/10/2017 Draft reviewed 1.1 Paul Moon BA (Hons) Ecological Consultant 12/10/2017 Draft – awaiting BRD 1.2 Jo Gregory BA (Hons) MSc GradCIEEM, Senior Consultant 13/10/2017 Final – BRD added 2 Arbtech Consultant’s Contact details: Paul Moon BA (Hons) Consultant Email: [email protected] Arbtech Consulting Ltd https://arbtech.co.uk Browns Limited The Old Lawn Tennis Club, Woodley, Berkshire, RG5 3JA Limitations and Copyright Arbtech Consulting Limited has prepared this report for the sole use of the above-named Client or their agents in accordance with our General Terms and Conditions, under which our services are performed. It is expressly stated that no other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this report or any other services provided by us. This report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of Arbtech Consulting Limited. The assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without significant change. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based upon information provided by third parties. Information obtained from third parties has not been independently verified by Arbtech Consulting Limited. © This report is the copyright of Arbtech Consulting Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited.
    [Show full text]
  • Bath Avon River Economy
    BATH AVON River Corridor Group BATH AVON RIVER ECONOMY FIRST REPORT OF BATH & NORTH EAST SOMERSET COUNCIL ADVISORY GROUP SUMMER 2011 Group Members The Bath Avon River Corridor Economy Advisory Group held its Inaugural Meeting in the Guildhall in Bath on 29th October 2010. Group members were nominated by Councillor Terry Gazzard or John Betty, Director of Development and Major Projects and North East Somerset Council, for their particular skills and relevant experience. Those present were: Michael Davis For experience in restoring the Kennet and Avon Canal Edward Nash For experience in urban regeneration and design management Jeremy Douch For experience in transport planning David Laming For experience in using the river for boating James Hurley Representing Low Carbon South West and for experience in resource efficiency Steve Tomlin For experience in reclamation of materials John Webb Representing Inland Waterways Association and the Kennet and Avon Canal Trust and experienced in Waterways management Nikki Wood For experience in water ecology Councillor Bryan Chalker For experience in Bath’s heritage and representing the Conservative Political Group Councillor Ian Gilchrist For experience in sustainability issues and representing the Liberal Democrats Political Group Melanie Birwe/ Tom Blackman For Bath and North East Somerset Council – liaison with Major Projects Office Steve Tomlin stood down in early 2011. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 9. The Role of the River in Flood Resilience 2. Executive Summary 10. Renewable Energy and Spatial Sustainability 3. The Problem and Its History 11. Creating Growth Points for Change a) The Geographic History b) The Challenges and Opportunities Now 12. Drivers of Economic Development c) The Regeneration Model • The Visitor Offer • University Sector 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pibwrlwyd Guidance
    Carmarthenshire County Council Supplementary Planning Pibwrlwyd Guidance Adopted December 2014 Produced by the Forward Planning Section Planning and Development Brief: Pibwrlwyd Contents Page 1. Introduction 2 Status of the Brief 2 2. The Site 2 3. Planning Context 2 Development Plan: The Carmarthenshire LDP 2 Planning History 3 4. Proposed Uses 4 5. Site Considerations 4 Design 4 Linkages and Access 4 Landscape and Biodiversity 5 Drainage 5 Phasing 6 Planning Requirements 6 Section 106 Requirements 6 Ground Conditions 6 6. Contacts 7 7. Disclaimer 7 Appendix 1: Planning History Figure 1: Location Plan Figure 2: Site Plan 1. Introduction 1.1 This Planning and Development Brief has been prepared as Supplementary Planning Guidance (SPG) to inform development proposals at Pibwrlwyd, Carmarthen. The Brief provides guidance by elaborating on the policies and proposals of the adopted Carmarthenshire Local Development Plan (LDP), and seeks to achieve a deliverable, high quality development that is sympathetic to the character of the surrounding area. 1.2 Production of this Brief has taken place as part of the preparation of the LDP and pays due regard to National Planning Policy. 1.3 Developers are encouraged to work closely with the Council to incorporate and reflect the content of this Brief into their proposals. Pre-application discussions with the Council are strongly encouraged. Proposals that do not accord with the development principles set out in the Brief will not be supported. Status of the Brief 1.4 This Brief was formally adopted by County Council on the 10th December 2014 as Supplementary Planning Guidance. The draft Brief was published in July 2013 and was subject to public consultation between the 31st July 2013 and the 11th October 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Vehicles and Infrastructure the Fourth of Eight Reports from the Transport Visions Network
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWE Bristol Research Repository Transport Visions Vehicles and Infrastructure The fourth of eight reports from the Transport Visions Network Authors Greg Marsden, Glenn Lyons, Mark Beecroft and Kiron Chatterjee Transportation Research Group, University of Southampton Editorial Board Jennifer Abley Cranfield University Mags Adams Lancaster University Simon Barnett Suffolk County Council Gary Burnett University of Nottingham Ali Clabburn Liftshare.com Richard Clegg University of York Matthew Frost Nottingham Trent University Simon Hubbard Peter Brett Associates Toby Rackliff Dumfries and Galloway Council Andrew Salkeld Leicester City Council The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, the Rees Jeffreys Road Fund and the Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, as sponsors of the Transport Visions Network, are very gratefully acknowledged. The views of individuals conveyed in this report are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of their respective employers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 1 Published by Landor Publishing Ltd Quadrant House 250 Kennington Lane London SE11 5RD First published February 2002 © Landor Publishing All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. ISBN 1 899650 28 8 No responsibility for any loss as a consequence of any person relying upon the information or the views contained in this publication is accepted by the authors, contributors, or publishers. TRANSPORT VISIONS Vehicles and Infrastructure 2 Contents Preface ................................................................................5 Introduction........................................................................9 1. Today's Vehicles and Infrastructure ............................ 13 2. Tomorrow's Vehicles and Infrastructure..................... 23 3. A Vision: Control Culture............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Swansea Bay Beach ST THOMAS SA1 ARIN MARINA MARITIMEE
    High Street Railway Station H PLEA Underpass The NCN Route 43 to liberty Stadium and Clydach E T City Temple Underpass A D HILL STREET S N G Ebenezer L A R E A N Baptist A N P T I G W Church G D O R V WORDSWORTH S P T A WINSTON ST RY STREET P N R R I L EBENEZER STREET B V E POTTE I A E L O T O E E L W C E I A E A R A N O E H A T U R D D R A WINDMILL TERRACE T E T M WATKIN STREET Y E R C T N R O B D E R R S C B S O N R E R A H N U AY VIEW R T Y A C A T G H N C E A R C 1 E T U R MARINER STRE G S R ET I S E I Y N ET S F D H C I SHORT STREET E E T A N JONES TERRACE T E S STRE Rail R N R G MILTON TE T R Station E IN O A R W R C A D E E Footbridge C D K I C U L E Y PLA D IVE E R V ROA D T - EY RA AN T D A R EW STREET R AN T R T i 4 R N X S E A E Grand O L v 2 R University of Wales C A E Hotel A 1 RA Trinity St David D 7 Swansea e CE - Fire Station r A 4 PIC TO QU 8 T GRENFE M N ARRY 3 S L O T a L PARK ROAD ER T U R A N C W w T E O R B STANLEY PLACE S P R Oldway E E STANLEY TERRACE E N L e N L UL Centre T A E F W T Parc Tawe L D H VICARAGE TERRACE A E A S 2 A I S L R Glynn Vivian O E D L A R R Llys R N P N Art Gallery L O A T M PEN ISA COED T R Glas A A S C D R N E RO T A H P X S G C E E L L I ST THOMAS ON IF A N T T H O T N IF H R IL L L C University of Wales E University of Wales G MACKWORTH TERRAC T Trinity St David E U E Trinity St David BBC A I E South West N S E Wales PL EASANT STREET E KINGS S Urban T A R R T Village B Ragged E RE E O T T C A A Swansea School A N L S KING D Amateurs S P LA K NE Centre S OMWELL STREET M Orchard ’ D CR W
    [Show full text]
  • Wokingham Borough Council Biodiversity Action Plan
    WOKINGHAM BOROUGH COUNCIL BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2012-2024 (Draft) FEBRUARY 2014 1 Forward 2 WOKINGHAM BOROUGH BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN 2012-2024 The Wokingham Biodiversity Action Plan is divided into the following three sections: PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND PART 2: LEGISLATION AND PROTECTIVE POLICIES PART 3: HABITAT ACTION PLANS (WITH LINKS TO ASSOCIATED SPECIES) GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS ASNW Ancient Semi Natural Woodland BAP Biodiversity Action Plan BARS Biodiversity Actions Reporting System BBOWT Berkshire Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire Wildlife Trust BNCF Berkshire Nature Conservation Forum DEFRA Department of Environment Farming and Rural Affairs EA Environment Agency FC Forestry Commission HAP Habitat Action Plan LA Local Authority LNR Local Nature Reserve LWS Local Wildlife Site NE Natural England PAWS Plantations on Ancient Woodland Sites SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest TVERC Thames Valley Environmental Records Centre PART ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1. Aims This new Wokingham Borough Biodiversity Action Plan (BAP) covers the period 2012-2024 and aims to build on the achievements of the previous Biodiversity Action Plan for the Borough (2003-2012). It combines those BAP targets identified in the 2008 progress report as requiring continued work, with newly identified targets, in one structured delivery framework. The overall aims of the Wokingham Borough BAP are to: • Raise awareness of the issues impacting on local biodiversity • Outline targets and actions which will enhance biodiversity in the Borough • Encourage and support community engagement; enabling local action to deliver targets • Encourage management practices sympathetic to wildlife; promoting “good practice” and providing guidance • Ensure policies are in place for the protection, management and enhancement of the local wildlife resource 1.2.
    [Show full text]