DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment RIVER MEASE CATCHMENT APRIL 2015 © Natural England 2015 1 Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment BLANK PAGE 2 Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment Natural England has engaged Westcountry Rivers Limited (the commercial arm of Westcountry Rivers Trust) to develop a method for catchment-wide pollution risk and source apportionment assessments. In addition, The Rivers Trust has been commissioned to facilitate the integration and dissemination of this work with Catchment Based Approach Partnerships. Catchment Based Approach (CaBA) was developed as a framework for improving water quality by Defra 2009. After a successful pilot phase in 2011 actions were made for the wider adoption and national roll out of CaBA from 2013. As rivers trusts now represent catchments across a large part of England and Wales, with new ones continually forming, they are responsible partner hosts for the majority of local CaBA initiatives around the United Kingdom. Key objectives of CaBA are to deliver positive and sustained outcomes for the water environment by promoting a better understanding of the environment at a local level; and to encourage local collaboration and more transparent decision-making when both planning and delivering activities to improve the water environment. The Catchment Based Approach is about much more than just complying with the Water Framework Directive. It allows local communities, businesses, organisations and other stakeholders to come together to undertake actions or develop projects which incorporate local priorities such as flood risk management, fisheries and biodiversity. The Catchment Based Approach will see issues being identified and tackled at a much more local level, giving key stakeholders and local communities the opportunity to get involved. “The introduction of the CaBA signifies a major change to land and water management. It is a key step in the right direction, but fulfilling its potential will take determination, imagination and thoughtful audit and review” (CIWEM, 2013). 3 Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment The Rivers Trust (a company limited by guarantee and granted registered charity, 2004) provides a logical extension for the increasing level of liaison that had taken place for some time between established rivers trusts. The main aims of The Rivers Trust are, “to co-ordinate, represent and develop the aims and interests of the member Trusts in the promotion of sustainable, holistic and integrated catchment management and sound environmental practices, recognising the wider economic benefits for local communities and the value of education.” Westcountry Rivers Ltd is the commercial trading subsidiary of the Westcountry Rivers Trust (charity no. 1135007 company no 06545646). All profits generated through the consultancy are covenanted to the Trust to help secure the preservation, protection, development and improvement of the rivers, streams, watercourses and water impoundments in the Westcountry and to advance the education of the public in the management of water. Cover photo: River Mease at Croxall © Paul Williams, 2011. Published by: Westcountry Rivers Ltd. Rain Charm House, Kyl Cober Parc, Stoke Climsland, Callington, Cornwall, PL17 8PH. Tel: 01579 372140; Email: [email protected]; Web: www.wrt.org.uk © Westcountry Rivers Ltd. 2015. All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Westcountry Rivers Ltd. Document history: Revision Details of Revision Prepared By Checked By Approved By Date of Issue Issue v1 1st draft for client comment Angela Bartlett Dave Johnson Russell Smith 10/04/15 Issue v2 Final revisions Angela Bartlett Russell Smith 4 Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment Contents Contents 5 Abbreviations 7 Executive summary 8 Introduction 11 1.1 Key contacts 12 1.2 Purpose statement 12 Methodology 13 1.3 Pollution risk assessment & source apportionment 13 1.3.1 Pollution risk modelling 13 1.3.2 Existing evidence and water quality data review 13 1.4 Intervention strategy development 13 1.4.1 Assessment of current mitigation measures in the catchment 13 1.4.2 Targeting delivery 14 1.4.3 Proposals for delivery of future intervention 14 1.5 Assessment of potential outcomes 14 1.6 Limitations and suggestions for further research 14 Catchment overview 15 1.7 Morphology & hydrology 15 1.8 Social & economic 22 1.9 Farming & land use 23 Catchment classifications and challenges 29 1.10 River Mease SSSI classifications 29 1.11 WFD classifications 32 Pollution risk assessment & source apportionment 33 1.12 Suspended solids 33 1.12.1 Fine sediment risk analysis 33 1.12.2 Sediment source apportionment 40 1.12.3 River corridor & landscape sediment risk assessments 42 1.12.4 Water quality sediment analysis 43 1.13 Phosphorus 46 1.13.1 Phosphorus risk analysis 46 1.13.2 Diffuse and point agricultural sources 47 1.13.3 Consented & unconsented discharges 48 1.13.4 Groundwater and in-stream sources 50 1.13.5 Phosphorus source apportionment 51 1.13.6 Surface water quality phosphorus analysis 59 1.14 Additional pollution risks to the SAC/SSSI 61 1.14.1 Pollution incidents 61 Intervention strategy development 64 1.15 Prior interventions 64 1.15.1 Natural habitats & designated sites 64 1.15.2 Previous on-farm interventions 65 1.16 Targeting delivery – FARMSCOPER modelling areas 75 5 Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment Assessment of outcomes 78 1.16.1 FARMSCOPER analysis 78 1.17 Deliverables and costs for proposed plan 88 1.18 Increasing STW load risk 89 Conclusion 91 1.19 Delivery challenges 96 References 97 Further information & contacts 98 Appendix 1: Summary of optimisation and mitigation methods. 99 Appendix 2: List of Environmental Stewardship Scheme options with water quality benefits included in each category. 102 6 Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment Abbreviations CaBA – Catchment Based Approach CEH – Centre for Ecology and Hydrology CSF – Catchment Sensitive Farming CSM – Common Standards Monitoring DWPP – Diffuse Water Pollution Plan ES – Environmental Stewardship HES – High Ecological Status JNCC - Joint Nature Conservation Committee LOD – Limit of detection RBMP – River Basin Management Plans SAC – Special Area of Conservation SDD – Small Domestic Discharge SRP – Soluble Reactive Phosphorus SS – Suspended Solids SSSI – Site of Scientific Interest STW – Sewage Treatment Works (or Wastewater Treatment Works WwTW) TP – Total Phosphorus UWWTD – Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive WFD – Water Framework Directive 7 Natural England Pollution Risk Assessment & Source Apportionment: River Mease Catchment Executive summary The River Mease is a lowland clay river in the Midlands area of England. The River Mease is designated as a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) under the EU Habitats Directive, and a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) under the Wildlife and Countryside Act. The River Mease which is referred to in this report includes both the designated section of the River Mease and the lower section of Gilwiskaw Brook. The River Mease SAC/ SSSI has been identified as failing to meet its water quality targets due, at least in part, to diffuse water pollution pressures. Phosphorus and sediment have been identified as the main diffuse water quality issue for the ecological health of the Mease SSSI/ SAC. Current annual mean Soluble Reactive Phosphorus (SRP) concentrations are more than double the water quality target for the Mease SSSI/ SAC at all monitoring locations and up to ten times higher than the water quality target at some monitoring locations. At a catchment scale, sources SRP are equally important from combined non-agricultural sources, including urban run-off and Sewage Treatment Works (STWs) discharges, and combined sources from arable and livestock agriculture. The main source of sediment is from agriculture; natural erosion is a minor source. Water quality monitoring, and therefore SSSI condition assessments and Water Framework Directive (WFD) status, results suggest that water quality problems are widespread throughout the catchment for SRP and sediment. However, the monitoring data has limited spatial and temporal coverage. It is possible that more targeted monitoring would support the more spatially varied pattern of risk identified by the modelling and characterisation data discussed below. Catchment management approaches have the potential to deliver significant improvements in SRP at a catchment scale, but FARMSCOPER modelling suggests improvements will not improve water quality sufficiently to achieve the water quality targets for the Mease SSSI/ SAC. Therefore, additional emphasis needs to be on the reduction of SRP from non-agricultural sources, most notably urban run-off, if conservation targets for SRP are likely to be met. It should be noted that the findings stated above originate from the SAGIS model used in this report. Some recommendations have been made within the report to improve understanding, particularly with regards to STW discharges to improve and review the SAGIS model for the Mease catchment. Measures to reduce SRP losses from point sources should be focused in the Gilwiskaw Brook sub- catchment,
Recommended publications
  • River Mease SAC Developer Contribution Scheme 2 Appendix

    River Mease SAC Developer Contribution Scheme 2 Appendix

    Appendix 1: Measures to be funded through the Developer Contributions Scheme 2 (DCS2) FINAL VERSION (June 2016) The need for DCS2 has been identified in response to the development allocations within the North West Leicestershire District Council Local Plan, which is currently being finalised. The Local Plan was subject to assessment under the Habitats Regulations1 and the Developer Contribution Scheme was identified as a key mechanism to provide NWLDC with the necessary confidence that development allocated within the catchment of the river will not be likely to have a significant effect on the River Mease SAC. The HRA of the Local Plan identified the need for DCS2 to deliver mitigation to facilitate the delivery of 1826 dwellings. On the basis of the estimated P loadings to the river from receiving works provided in E&F of DCS2, an estimate of phosphate contributions from these dwellings represents an increased loading of 329g P/day. Of critical importance to the development of DCS2, is an agreement which has been reached since the development and implementation of DCS1. Following recent discussions between Natural England, the Environment Agency and Severn Trent Water, the following statement has been issued. Severn Trent, Environment Agency and Natural England have assessed the options to meet the SAC conservation objectives in relation to flow and phosphate, and agree that pumping sewage effluent from Packington and Measham sewage works out of the Mease catchment is the most effective long term solution. The primary reason to move flow out of the River Mease catchment would be to ensure the SAC flow targets are met.
  • Action for Nature

    Action for Nature

    Action for Nature A Strategic Approach to Biodiversity, Habitat and the Local Environment for Leicestershire County Council Published June 2021 Table of Contents Page 1. Introduction 1 2. Guiding Principles of our Approach 4 3. Legislative and Policy Context 5 4. Biodiversity and Natural Capital 18 5. Opportunities for Delivering the Biodiversity Objectives 28 6. Development and Implementation of the Delivery Plan 31 Appendix 1: Glossary of Terms 34 Appendix 2: Priority Habitats and Species in Leicestershire 37 Appendix 3: National Character Areas of Leicestershire 38 Appendix 4: Accessible Countryside & Woodland in 42 Leicestershire Appendix 5: Larger versions of maps used in document 44 Appendix 6: Sources of data 50 Action for Nature A Strategic Approach to Biodiversity, Habitat and the Local Environment for Leicestershire County Council 1. Introduction Working together for the benefit of everyone: Leicestershire County Council’s Strategic Plan 2018 to 20221 commits the Council to being ‘a carbon neutral organisation by 2030, to use natural resources wisely and to contribute to the recovery of nature’. The Council’s Environment Strategy 2018-20302, provides the vision behind this commitment: ‘We will minimise the environmental impact of our own activities and will improve the wider environment through local action. We will play our full part to protect the environment of Leicestershire., We will tackle climate change and embed environmental sustainability into what we do.’ This vision is supported by several aims and objectives that
  • Leicestershire

    Leicestershire

    Archaeological Investigations Project 2003 Post-Determination & Non-Planning Related Projects East Midlands LEICESTERSHIRE Blaby 3/25 (E.31.L024) SP 57609800 LE2 9TL GLEN PARVA MOAT, THE FORD, LITTLE GLEN ROAD An Archaeological watching Brief at Glen Parva Moat Hyam, A Leicester : University of Leicester Archaeological Services, 2003, 7pp, refs Work undertaken by: University of Leicester Archaeological Services There was high potential for buried archaeological remains as the site incorporated a moat which is a Scheduled Monument. A shallow pathway 0.15 to 0.2m in depth was excavated in a circular route to the west of the Moat revealing mid grey-brown topsoil on top of grey-brown silty loam subsoil. No archaeological features were observed. Foundations for a site access bridge and gates were also excavated revealing dark brown silty loam above the natural substrate of orange-brown silty clay. No archaeological features or deposits were recorded. [Au(adp)] 3/26 (E.31.L026) SP 50309645 LE9 3JQ POTTERS KILN, STANTON LANE CROFT An Archaeological Watching Brief at Potters Kiln, Stanton Lane, Croft Jarvis, W Leicester : University of Leicester Archaeological Services, 2003, 13pp, figs, tabs Work undertaken by: University of Leicester Archaeological Services An archaeological watching brief was carried out during the groundworks for a new m#nage and associated access road and car park. No archaeological deposits were identified, with artefacts being restricted to occasional unstratified finds of Potter's Marston ware, probably from manuring of the fields. These finds were restricted to the south of the area. [Au(adp)] Archaeological periods represented: PM 3/27 (E.31.Q011) SP 49109470 LE9 4DQ TUDOR COTTAGE, CAREY HILL ROAD, STONEY STANTON An Archaeological Impact Assessment Concerning the Impact of Proposed Works to be Carried Out on the Grade II Listed Building Known as: Tudor Cottage, Carey Hill, Stoney Stanton.
  • Mease/Sence Lowlands

    Mease/Sence Lowlands

    Character Area Mease/Sence 72 Lowlands Key Characteristics hedgerows have been diminished and sometimes removed. In the many areas of arable cultivation the hedgerow trees, which ● Gently-rolling landform of low rounded hills and comprise mainly ash and oak, are patchily distributed. The valleys. greatest extent of treecover comes from the large parklands at Gopsall Park, Market Bosworth, Thorpe Constantine and ● Flat land along river valleys. Shenton which often contain imposing mansions. ● Extensive, very open areas of arable cultivation. ● Strongly rectilinear hedge pattern of late enclosure, often dominating an open landscape. ● Tree cover confined to copses, spinneys, intermittent hedgerow trees and parks. ● Scattered large parks with imposing mansions. ● Small red-brick villages, often on hilltop sites and with prominent church spires. ● Ridge and furrow and deserted settlements. ● Isolated 19th century farmsteads. Landscape Character This area comprises the land hugging the western and southern flanks of the Leicestershire and South Derbyshire OB COUSINS/COUNTRYSIDE AGENCY OB COUSINS/COUNTRYSIDE Coalfield. The Trent valley forms its western boundary R between Burton upon Trent and Tamworth. From there Gently rolling clay ridges and shallow river valleys are framed by a eastwards it has a boundary with the Arden. On its south strongly rectilinear hedge pattern containing extensive areas of arable cultivation. eastern boundary this area merges with the Leicestershire Vales. Small villages, generally on the crests of the low ridges, are the most prominent features in the landscape other than The claylands surrounding the Mease and Sence fall unfortunately-sited pylons. Red brick cottages and houses southwards towards the valleys of the rivers Anker and with slate or pantile roofs cluster around spired churches Trent and are characterised by extensive areas of arable and, occasionally, timber framed buildings are to be seen in cultivation with low, sparse hedges and few hedgerow trees.
  • North West Leicestershire District Council Detailed Water Cycle Study

    North West Leicestershire District Council Detailed Water Cycle Study

    North West Leicestershire District Council Detailed Water Cycle Study Final Report AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited May 2012 Copyright and Non-Disclosure Notice The contents and layout of this report are subject to copyright owned by AMEC (©AMEC Environment & Infrastructure UK Limited 2012). save to the extent that copyright has been legally assigned by us to another party or is used by AMEC under licence. To the extent that we own the copyright in this report, it may not be copied or used without our prior written agreement for any purpose other than the purpose indicated in this report. The methodology (if any) contained in this report is provided to you in confidence and must not be disclosed or copied to third parties without the prior written agreement of AMEC. Disclosure of that information may constitute an actionable breach of confidence or may otherwise prejudice our commercial interests. Any third party who obtains access to this report by any means will, in any event, be subject to the Third Party Disclaimer set out below. Third-Party Disclaimer Any disclosure of this report to a third party is subject to this disclaimer. The report was prepared by AMEC at the instruction of, and for use by, our client named on the front of the report. It does not in any way constitute advice to any third party who is able to access it by any means. AMEC excludes to the fullest extent lawfully permitted all liability whatsoever for any loss or damage howsoever arising from reliance on the contents of this report.
  • Twycross Parish Council Meeting – 21St September 2017

    Twycross Parish Council Meeting – 21St September 2017

    Twycross Parish Council Meeting – 21st September 2017 Meeting Minutes Minutes of the meeting held on 21st September 2017 at Norton Juxta Twycross Village Hall, commencing at 19:03 037/17: Present & Apologies Councillors: A. Davies (Chair), S. Hubbard, A. Taylor Clerk: C. Bailey Apologies received and accepted: W. Nally, M. Large, G. Massey LCC Councillor: I. Ould HBBC Councillor: K. Morrell (absent) Others: 8 parishioners 038/17: Declaration of Interest None declared. 039/17: Approval of Previous Minutes (July 2017) July minutes proposed as a true record of the meeting. Proposed by Cllr. Taylor, seconded by Cllr. Hubbard. Unanimously agreed. Minutes signed by the Chair, Cllr. Davies. 040/17: Councillor Vacancies (1 x Norton Juxta Twycross) The Council have not received any applications for the vacancy and no interest was shown by the Norton Juxta Twycross parishioners attending the meeting. RESOLVED: The vacancy will continue to be advertised. 041/17: Matters Arising from Previous Minutes i. Farm traffic issues: Cllr. Davies advised he has raised the issues regarding farm traffic not driving in accordance with regulations, with the NFU. ii. Social Media Policy: Clerk to create policy prior to the next meeting. 042/17: Public Questions and Comments (10 Minutes) Issues raised regarding planning application 17/00881/OUT (8 Wood Lane, Norton Juxta Twycross). See minute reference 045/17 (viii): Planning. No other issues were raised. 043/17: Reports i. Leicestershire County Council (August report circulated prior to the meeting). • Crime Commissioners meeting: Lord Willy Bach (Police) was reported to be disappointed by the low attendance. Cllr. Ould recommended that the next meeting be held during the evening to accommodate working councillors.
  • HS2 and Appleby Magna Response by Appleby Magna Parish Council to the Draft Environmental Statement – December 2018

    HS2 and Appleby Magna Response by Appleby Magna Parish Council to the Draft Environmental Statement – December 2018

    Appleby Magna Parish Council - Response to HS2 HS2 and Appleby Magna Response by Appleby Magna Parish Council to the Draft Environmental Statement – December 2018 1. Appleby Magna and Parva – characteristics and facilities HS2’s Draft Environmental Statement provides accounts of Appleby’s characteristics and facilities in a number of sections. The Parish Council has identified omissions, inaccuracies and limitations. Rather than detail these section by section we would like to start with our own description of Appleby Parish. Appleby Parish Map As can be seen from the map left the parish of Appleby includes both the village of Appleby Magna and the hamlet of Appleby Parva. The parish runs to the outskirts of Measham (at Birds Hill) and Snarestone village. It is primarily a rural parish, including a number of farms. The M42 runs through the West of the parish. Housing in Appleby Parva is primarily on, or close to, the A444 towards Nuneaton. However, Appleby Magna is unusual in being close to, but not located on, any major road. This is important for its sense of place. The Appleby Magna and Appleby Parva Village Design Statement (which was the result of extensive public consultation and participation and became adopted as supplementary planning guidance) identified four elements of village character which development should seek to conserve: community spirit, rural nature, heritage, and quality and diversity of design (guideline 1). The minor village roads connecting the village to the major road network also attract significant numbers of cyclists and horse riders. Appleby Magna has been subject to significant housing growth in the last couple of years.
  • River Mease Catchment Partnership Workshop

    River Mease Catchment Partnership Workshop

    River Mease Catchment Partnership Workshop Tuesday 4th July 2017 Netherseal Sports Club Workshop Report Facilitated by Trent Rivers Trust, catchment hosts for the River Mease catchment. 1 Background As part of the ‘Catchment Based Approach’, a workshop was organised for stakeholders within the catchment area of the River Mease. Thirty-six people attended from twenty-two organisations. Representatives attended from a range of interests including farmers, landowners, community groups, special interest groups, NGO’s, Highways England, Severn Trent, Environment Agency and Natural England. The River Mease is designated as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and a Special Area of Conservation (SAC) for its populations of fish and aquatic plant life. The SSSI/SAC condition is currently classified by Natural England as ‘unfavourable no change’. This is due to a range of issues including drainage works, diffuse pollution and lack of habitat and species diversity. There are a number of actions required to bring the SSSI into a good condition. There is currently a lot of activity taking place across the catchment, examples are Catchment Sensitive Farming, a developer contribution scheme and a restoration strategy. Objectives of the workshop: • Bring partners and stakeholders together. • Raise awareness of existing initiatives and projects. • Agree a framework to coordinate policy and future action in the Mease catchment. The day was organised into the following sections 1) Mapping of current and future activity Participants were asked to mark-up paper maps on the tables showing the location of projects or activity they were aware of within the Mease catchment. Each project listed was marked as either ‘complete, current or proposed’ with details of the nature of the project and a contact name.
  • Plot 1, the Croft, Church Street, Donisthorpe, Derbyshire, DE12 7PX

    Plot 1, the Croft, Church Street, Donisthorpe, Derbyshire, DE12 7PX

    Plot 1, The Croft, Church Street, Donisthorpe, Derbyshire, DE12 7PX Plot 1 The Croft, Church Street, Donisthorpe, Derbyshire, DE12 7PX Asking Price: £220,000 A unique individual building plot set within the gardens and grounds of a substantial arts and crafts family home within the heart of this popular South Derbyshire village ideal for commuting. This is a unique opportunity rarely afforded incorporates a mature site with established trees and planning permission granted for a four bedroom family home incorporating 3 reception rooms and a large 24.5ft living kitchen together with en-suite, utility room and double garage. Features • A unique individual building plot • Approximately 1900sq ft plus garaging • Three reception rooms • A 24.5 ft Living kitchen with utility • Master Bedroom with en suite • Three further bedrooms • Attached double garage • Mature grounds • Village setting, close to excellent road networks Location Donisthorpe village is located approximately three miles south west of Ashby de la Zouch, located in the county of North West Leicestershire. The river Mease runs through the village with the centre of the village situated on the southern side of the river. Donisthorpe has two public houses, a village shop and is served by a local primary school and is within catchment for Ivanhoe College and Ashby School. The village was home to Donisthorpe colliery, where the pit closed in 1990. At the time of the pit closure Donisthorpe was very much a mining village with a strong community. The colliery site has since become part of the Donisthorpe Woodland Park with land acquired from British Coal forming part of the National Forest with the woodland parks connecting to the Wolds Heritage Trail, Moira Furnace, canal and the National Forest Centre at Moira.
  • River Mease Walkover Survey Report Natural England APEM Ref 413482 March 2016 This Project Is Part of the IPENS Programme (LIFE1

    River Mease Walkover Survey Report Natural England APEM Ref 413482 March 2016 This Project Is Part of the IPENS Programme (LIFE1

    River Mease Walkover Survey Report Natural England APEM Ref 413482 March 2016 This project is part of the IPENS programme (LIFE11NAT/UK/000384IPENS) which is financially supported by LIFE, a financial instrument of the European Community Dr Peter Stone Client: Natural England Address: APEX Court City Link Nottingham NG2 4LA Project reference: 413482 Date of issue: April 2015 ________________________ Project Director: Dr David Fraser Project Manager: Dr Peter Stone Other: Hugh Graham ________________________ APEM Ltd Riverview A17 Embankment Business Park Heaton Mersey Stockport SK4 3GN Tel: 0161 442 8938 Fax: 0161 432 6083 Registered in England No. 2530851 “This is a draft document and should not be cited” Registered in England No. 2530851, Registered Address Riverview A17 Embankment Business Park, Heaton Mersey, Stockport, SK4 3GN Revision and Amendment Register Version Date Section(s) Page(s) Summary of Changes Approved by Number 1 10/2/15 Draft for client review PS 2 27/02/15 5 27 Final following client comment PS Contents 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Project Background ................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Aims and Objectives ................................................................................................. 1 2. Methodology ...................................................................................................................
  • Report of the Director of Community and Planning Services

    Report of the Director of Community and Planning Services

    REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY AND PLANNING SERVICES SECTION 1: Planning Applications SECTION 2: Planning Appeals In accordance with the provisions of Section 100D of the Local Government Act 1972, BACKGROUND PAPERS are the contents of the files whose registration numbers are quoted at the head of each report, but this does not include material which is confidential or exempt (as defined in Sections 100A and D of that Act, respectively). -------------------------------- 1. PLANNING APPLICATIONS This section also includes reports on applications for: approvals of reserved matters, listed building consent, work to trees in tree preservation orders and conservation areas, conservation area consent, hedgerows work, advertisement consent, notices for permitted development under the General Permitted Development Order 1995 (as amended) responses to County Matters and major infrastructure submissions to the Planning Inspectorate. Reference Item Place Ward Page 9/2013/0274 1.1 Netherseal Seales 1 9/2012/0570 1.2 Acresford Seales 6 CW9/2011/0002 1.3 Foston Hilton 25 When moving that a site visit be held, Members will be expected to consider and propose one or more of the following reasons: 1. The issues of fact raised by the Director of Community and Planning Services’ report or offered in explanation at the Committee meeting require further clarification by a demonstration of condition of site. 2. Further issues of principle, other than those specified in the report of the Director of Community and Planning Services, arise from a Member’s personal knowledge of circumstances on the ground that lead to the need for clarification that may be achieved by a site visit.
  • Geomorphological Assessment of Channel Widening Downstream of the Confluence of the River Trent and the River Tame

    Geomorphological Assessment of Channel Widening Downstream of the Confluence of the River Trent and the River Tame

    Geomorphological Assessment of channel widening downstream of the confluence of the River Trent and the River Tame JBA Project Manager George Heritage The Brew House Wilderspool Park Greenall's Avenue Warrington WA4 6HL October 2011 Staffordshire Wildlife Trust The Wolseley Centre, Wolseley Bridge, Stafford. ST17 0WT i 2009s0465 Croxall Lakes channel widening assessment DRAFT2 to JNC 02-11-09.docx JBA Office JBA Consulting The Brew House Wilderspool Park Greenall's Avenue WARRINGTON Cheshire WA4 6HL tel: 01925 437020 www.jbaconsulting.co.uk JBA Project Manager George Heritage BSc. PhD. Revision History Revision Ref / Date Amendments Issued to Issued 29/09/2009 Initial draft Jonathan Cooper 4/11/2009 Revised draft Nick Mott & Jonathan Cooper Contract This report describes work commissioned by Nick Mott, on behalf of Staffordshire Wildlife Trust, by a letter dated 23rd September 2009. Staffordshire Wildlife Trust’s representative for the contract was Nick Mott. George Heritage of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by ...................................... George Heritage BSc PhD Technical Director (Dynamic geomorphology) Reviewed by ..................................... Jonathan Cooper BEng MSc CEng MICE MCIWEM MloD DipCD Director: Environment Division Purpose This document has been prepared as a draft report for Staffordshire Wildlife Trust. JBA Consulting accepts no responsibility or liability for any use that is made of this document other than by the Client for the purposes for which it was originally commissioned and prepared. JBA Consulting has no liability regarding the use of this report except to Staffordshire Wildlife Trust. If the site is sold, the scope of the development changed or this report is provided to third parties then any liability or explicit or implied warranty is voided unless the consent of JBA Consulting is obtained.