Directions to the University of Massachusetts Amherst Campus Music Department- Fine Arts Center

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

DIRECTIONS TO THE UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST CAMPUS MUSIC DEPARTMENT- FINE ARTS CENTER By Car: From the South: Interstate 91 (north) to Exit 19 (Northampton). Turn Right at the bottom of the ramp on to Route 9 (east) through Hadley. At the Hampshire Mall stay in the left lane and follow the signs for the left turn on to Route 116 (north). The UMass Exit is 1 mile north. Turn right at the top of the ramp (on Massachusetts Avenue) to the second 'full' (don't count blinking yellow lights) traffic light. Left at that light and then take the immediate right and then immediate left turn into Parking Lot #62. The Music Department is across North Pleasant Street from Lot #62 in the eastern end of the Fine Arts Center. On Audition Days there will be signage directing you to Audition Registration. On other days visitors to the Department should enter the building through the BEZANSON Lobby and follow the signs to the Music Department Office. From the North: Interstate 91 (south) to Exit 24. Turn Left at the end of the ramp to the first traffic light. Right at the light on to Route 116 (south) through Sunderland. Stay in the right lane after the road divides into four lanes for the UMass Exit. Turn Left at the top of the ramp (on Massachusetts Avenue) and follow the directions above to Parking Lot #62. From the Massachusetts Turnpike (Interstate 90) Eastbound or Westbound: Take Exit 4 (West Springfield) and following signs to Interstate 91 (north) and use the "From the South" directions above. From Massachusetts Route 2 Eastbound or Westbound: Drive to Greenfield and follow the signs for Interstate 91 (south) and use the "From the North" directions above. By Air: Bradley International Airport (Hartford/Springfield) is 45 miles south of UMass Amherst. (Follow signs to Interstate 91 (north) and use "From the South" directions above.) Logan International Airport (Boston) is 90 miles east of UMass Amherst. (Follow signs to the Massachusetts Turnpike (Interstate 90) and refer to the directions above.) By Bus: Peter Pan Bus Lines (800-343-9999) links the campus to Bradley and Logan airports as well as points throughout the region. By Train: AMTRAK (800-872-7245) serves Springfield, Massachusetts. The Peter Pan Bus Terminal is three blocks from the station. Campus Map of selected Sylvan facilities and locations. Residential Area Northeast Residence Area To Rts. 116, 9, and I-91 to Amherst Center .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Final Point of Access Study
Prepared for: I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project Technical Memorandum No. 28 FINAL POINT OF ACCESS STUDY Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A Prepared by: Philadelphia, PA In association with: HNTB Corporation STV Inc. Gannett Fleming, Inc. A.D. Marble & Company Kise Straw & Kolodner, Inc. Riverfront Associates, Inc. November, 2012 1 2 Technical Memorandum No. 28 – Final Point of Access Study Contract C-393A, Capital Project No. CP0301A I-95/Scudder Falls Bridge Improvement Project TABLE OF CONTENTS A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY, INTRODUCTION AMD REQUIREMENTS ... 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................ 1 Purpose of Access......................................................................... 1 Summary of Findings .................................................................... 2 II. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 7 Project Description .............................................................. 7 Study Area Description ........................................................ 7 Project Area Description .................................................... 10 Project Purpose and Need .................................................. 11 III. REQUIREMENTS FOR APPROVAL OF ACCESS ..................................... 12 B. ENGINEERING STUDY ............................................................. 17 I. CURRENT CONDITIONS ........................................................... 17 Roadway Network
[Show full text]
Windsor Locks Main Street Study
TOWNTOWN OFOF WINDSORWINDSOR LOCKS,LOCKS, CONNECTICUTCONNECTICUT © BRAD WELTON AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PREPARED BY: DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN FINAL DRAFT MAY, 2008 IN ASSOCIATION WITH: AMADON & ASSOCIATES, INC Funded in part by a grant from the Connecticut Main Street Center, Inc., and the FUSS & O’NEILL Connecticut Commission on Culture and Tourism. TABLETABLE OFOF CONTENTSCONTENTS GOALS............................................................................PAGE 2 TRANSPORTATION / PARKING PROCESS……………………………………………………PAGE 3 RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………......….PAGE 29 EXISTING CONDITIONS / OPPORTUNITIES TRANSPORTATION BICYCLE / PEDESTRIAN AND CONSTRAINTS…………………………………........PAGE 4 RECOMMENDATIONS........................………......…..PAGE 32 REGIONAL INFLUENCES………………………………...PAGE 5 TRANSPORTATION RAIL…………………….......….PAGE 33 STUDY AREA……………………………………………….PAGE 6 EXISTING STATION LOCATIONS………...........…...PAGE 34 HISTORIC INFLUENCES……………………...................PAGE 7 MAINTAIN / ENHANCE SENSE OF PLACE………..PAGE 35 WINDSOR LOCKS TODAY…………………...................PAGE 8 STREETSCAPE RECOMMENDATIONS………...….PAGE 36 MARKET ASSESSMENT………………………………….PAGE 9 KEY REDEVELOPMENT PARCELS….....................PAGE 39 EXISTING LAND USE………………………………….....PAGE 12 KEY DEVELOPMENT PARCEL………………..…….PAGE 41 EXISTING ZONING………………………………………..PAGE 13 “Historic Train Station” EXISTING RECREATIONAL AND KEY DEVELOPMENT PARCEL…………..………….PAGE 45 ENVIRONMENTAL…………………….......................….PAGE 14 “Montgomery Mill” EXISTING TRANSPORTATION………………………….PAGE 15 KEY DEVELOPMENT PARCEL……………….….…..PAGE
[Show full text]
Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study
Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study final report prepared for Federal Highway Administration September 2009 final report Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study prepared for Federal Highway Administration date September 2009 Longer Combination Vehicles on Exclusive Truck Lanes: Interstate 90 Corridor Case Study Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Study Overview .......................................................................................... 1-1 2.0 Research Approach ............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Analytical Framework ............................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Data Collection and Testing ...................................................................... 2-1 2.3 Outreach ....................................................................................................... 2-2 3.0 Facility Characteristics ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Highway Physical Characteristics ............................................................ 3-1 3.2 Highway Operations .................................................................................. 3-3 3.3 Capital Improvement Costs .....................................................................
[Show full text]
MOHICAN NEWSNEWS the People of the Waters That Are Never Still
STOCKBRIDGE-MUNSEE COMMUNITY Band of Mohicans MOHICANMOHICAN NEWSNEWS The people of the waters that are never still Vol. XXVII No. 11 N8480 Moh He Con Nuck Road • Bowler, WI 54416 June 1, 2019 North Star Mohican Casino Resort’s 27th Year Holsey Key Note at WIEA and Burr is Teacher of the Year By Jeff Vele – Mohican News Editor This year the Wisconsin Indian Education Association (WIEA) Awards Banquet was held at the Hotel Mead and Conference Center in Wisconsin Rapids, WI. The theme this year was “12 Nations, 2 Worlds, 1 People”. The Stockbridge-Munsee Community was well represented at the conference with President Shannon Holsey as the keynote speaker and several people from North Star Mohican Casino Resort general manager Michael Bonakdar, the area being recognized at the center, cuts into a cake for the resort’s 27th anniversary. (L to R):Terrance Indian Educator of the Year is Ms. awards banquet at the end of the Lucille Burr Stockbridge–Munsee Miller, Tammy Wyrobeck, Jachim Jaddoud, Bonakdar, Kirsten Holland, event, including Lucille Burr being and Brian Denny. Casino continued on page Four: Community Tribal member and, recognized as Teacher of the Year. Title VI Teacher, Shawano School District Whose homeland is the Mohawk Trail? President Holsey addressed a those advertised today to tourists roomful of teachers, students and you are really, truly the people coming to the Berkshires. family members, and educational that educate our children. It is so They hiked the woods and hunted leaders. Holsey started by saying, important to support you, as we black bear, deer and turkey.
[Show full text]
Northeast Energy Direct Project Docket No. Pf14-22-000
NORTHEAST ENERGY DIRECT PROJECT DOCKET NO. PF14-22-000 DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT RESOURCE REPORT 10 ALTERNATIVES PUBLIC Submitted by: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. 1001 Louisiana Street Houston, Texas 77002 November 2014 Environmental Report NED Project Resource Report 10 Alternatives 10-i RESOURCE REPORT 10 – ALTERNATIVES SUMMARY OF FILING INFORMATION INFORMATION FOUND IN Address the “no action” alternative (§ 380.12 (l)(1)). Section 10.1 For large Projects, address the effect of energy conservation or Section 10.1.1 energy alternatives to the Project Section 10.1.2 (§ 380.12 (l)(1)). Identify system alternatives considered during the identification of the Project and provide the rationale for rejecting each Section 10.2 alternative (§ 380.12 (l)(1)). Identify major and minor route alternatives considered to avoid impact on sensitive environmental areas (e.g., wetlands, parks, Section 10.3 or residences) and provide sufficient comparative data to justify the selection of the proposed route (§ 380.12 (l)(2)(ii)). Identify alternative sites considered for the location of major new aboveground facilities and provide sufficient comparative Sections 10.4, 10.5, and 10.6 data to justify the selection of the proposed site (§ 380.12 (l)(2)(ii)). November 2014 Environmental Report NED Project Resource Report 10 Alternatives 10-ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 10.0 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 10-1 10.1 NO-ACTION ALTERNATIVE ...................................................................................
[Show full text]
Allston I-90 Multimodal Update Presented to the Board on 06/22/2020
I-90 ALLSTON INTERCHANGE A MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PROJECT MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING JUNE 22, 2020 MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 Today’s Agenda • Overview: Where Does the Project Stand? • What “Throat” Alternatives Will Be Evaluated? • How Will The Choice Be Made Among The Build Alternatives? • How Do Alternatives Preliminarily Compare? • What Happens Next? MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 2 Purpose and Need of Allston Multimodal Project MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 3 How Current Infrastructure Carries Travel to Boston from the West (measured as Average Daily Travel or ADT) • Serves as main interstate route into Boston from the Interstate 90: west • Key freight link from Conley terminal to rail ~150,000 ADT intermodal facility • Considerations for future congestion management • 4 lanes required in each direction Soldiers Field Road: • Currently serves as major commuting route from west and northwest origin points ~75,000 ADT • If traffic can be reduced sufficiently in future, roadway could be redesigned as a true parkway • Potential for more ridership in medium term Worcester/Framingham (better station access, triple track project under study by MBTA) Commuter Rail: • Potential for new service model with higher ridership under consideration in Commuter ~18,000 ADT Rail vision but MBTA is 18 months away from having a new rail operating model MASSDOT/FMCB JOINT MEETING – 6/22/20 4 Why is the “throat” so difficult? • In the narrowest section of the “throat” there are 204 feet of available space between Boston University’s
[Show full text]
Narrative Report
䤀ⴀ㠀㤀䰀攀戀愀渀漀渀Ⰰ 一䠀 ⴀ 䠀愀爀琀昀漀爀搀Ⰰ 嘀吀䈀爀椀搀最攀刀攀挀漀渀猀琀爀甀挀琀椀漀渀 ☀ 圀椀搀攀渀椀渀最倀爀漀樀攀挀琀吀䤀䜀䔀刀㤀 ⴀ 䜀爀愀渀琀䄀瀀瀀氀椀挀愀琀椀漀渀 U.S. Department of Transportation Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery ”TIGER” GRANT APPLICATION PROJECT NARRATIVE REPORT Project Name: I-89 Lebanon, NH – Hartford, VT Bridge Reconstruction and Widening Project Project Type: Bridge Rehabilitation Project Location: Urban, Lebanon, NH and Hartford, VT Project Website: https://www.nh.gov/dot/projects/lebhart16148/index.htm Funds Requested: $10,000,000 (28%) Other State and Federal Funds New Hampshire: $17,056,000 (48%) Vermont: $ 8,544,000 (24%) Total Construction Costs: $35,600,000 Contact: Mr. L. Robert Landry, Jr., P.E. Administrator, Bureau of Bridge Design New Hampshire Department of Transportation 7 Hazen Drive, PO Box 483 Concord, NH 03302-0483 Telephone: 603.271.3921 [email protected] DUNS #: 80-859-1697 Vietnam Veterans Memorial Bridges Interstate 89 Lebanon, NH – Hartford, VT 1 Table of Contents OVERVIEW AND INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................. 5 TRANSPORTATION CHALLENGES THE PROJECT AIMS TO ADDRESS ........................................................... 7 HOW THE PROJECT WILL ADDRESS THESE CHALLENGES ............................................................................ 7 PROJECT PARTIES ........................................................................................................................................
[Show full text]
National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
NPS Form 10-900 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "xu in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1. Name of Propertv historic name Jonathan and Simon Hosmer House other nameslsite number Francis Tuttle House; Twin Chestnut Farm 2. Location street & number 300 Main Street -NIA not for publication city or town Acton NIA vicinity state Massachusetts code MA county Middlesex code 017 zip code 01720 3. StatelFederal Aqencv Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this idnomination 17 request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property dmeets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant nationally 17 statewide d10ca11~:(I3 See continuation sheet for additional comments.) XBCSb- aswd a*,6 a06 L Signature of certifying officialrritle Brona Simon, Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer Date State or Federal aaencv and bureau In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
[Show full text]
Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix
Preserving Connecticut's Bridges Report Appendix - September 2018 Year Open/Posted/Cl Rank Town Facility Carried Features Intersected Location Lanes ADT Deck Superstructure Substructure Built osed Hartford County Ranked by Lowest Score 1 Bloomfield ROUTE 189 WASH BROOK 0.4 MILE NORTH OF RTE 178 1916 2 9,800 Open 6 2 7 2 South Windsor MAIN STREET PODUNK RIVER 0.5 MILES SOUTH OF I-291 1907 2 1,510 Posted 5 3 6 3 Bloomfield ROUTE 178 BEAMAN BROOK 1.2 MI EAST OF ROUTE 189 1915 2 12,000 Open 6 3 7 4 Bristol MELLEN STREET PEQUABUCK RIVER 300 FT SOUTH OF ROUTE 72 1956 2 2,920 Open 3 6 7 5 Southington SPRING STREET QUINNIPIAC RIVER 0.6 MI W. OF ROUTE 10 1960 2 3,866 Open 3 7 6 6 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 MARKET STREET & I-91 NB EAST END I-91 & I-84 INT 1961 4 125,700 Open 5 4 4 7 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING EASTBOUND 1965 3 66,450 Open 6 4 4 8 Hartford INTERSTATE-91 NB PARK RIVER & CSO RR AT EXIT 29A 1964 2 48,200 Open 5 4 4 9 New Britain SR 555 (WEST MAIN PAN AM SOUTHERN RAILROAD 0.4 MILE EAST OF RTE 372 1930 3 10,600 Open 4 5 4 10 West Hartford NORTH MAIN STREET WEST BRANCH TROUT BROOK 0.3 MILE NORTH OF FERN ST 1901 4 10,280 Open N 4 4 11 Manchester HARTFORD ROAD SOUTH FORK HOCKANUM RIV 2000 FT EAST OF SR 502 1875 2 5,610 Open N 4 4 12 Avon OLD FARMS ROAD FARMINGTON RIVER 500 FEET WEST OF ROUTE 10 1950 2 4,999 Open 4 4 6 13 Marlborough JONES HOLLOW ROAD BLACKLEDGE RIVER 3.6 MILES NORTH OF RTE 66 1929 2 1,255 Open 5 4 4 14 Enfield SOUTH RIVER STREET FRESHWATER BROOK 50 FT N OF ASNUNTUCK ST 1920 2 1,016 Open 5 4 4 15 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EB BROAD ST, I-84 RAMP 191 1.17 MI S OF JCT US 44 WB 1966 3 71,450 Open 6 4 5 16 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 EAST NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 NEW PARK AV,AMTRAK,SR504 1967 3 69,000 Open 6 4 5 17 Hartford INTERSTATE-84 WB AMTRAK;LOCAL RDS;PARKING .82 MI N OF JCT SR 504 SB 1965 4 66,150 Open 6 4 5 18 Hartford I-91 SB & TR 835 CONNECTICUT SOUTHERN RR AT EXIT 29A 1958 5 46,450 Open 6 5 4 19 Hartford SR 530 -AIRPORT RD ROUTE 15 422 FT E OF I-91 1964 5 27,200 Open 5 6 4 20 Bristol MEMORIAL BLVD.
[Show full text]
PROJECT DESCRIPTION Interchange Improvements to I-691 Eastbound Off-Ramp to I-91 Northbound
State Project No.: 0079-245 Federal Aid Project No.: TBD I-91/I-691/ Route 15 Interchange Improvements in Meriden, CT PROJECT DESCRIPTION Interchange Improvements to I-691 Eastbound Off-Ramp to I-91 Northbound LOCATION: This proposed project is located on a segment of Interstate 91 (I-91) that provides access to Route 15 (Wilbur Cross Parkway), Interstate 691 (I-691), and East Main Street in the City of Meriden. All three highways in the project area consist of a complex system of mainline lanes, weave sections and ramp connections that form the I-91/I-691/Route 15 Interchange. The improvements proposed as part of this project encompass highway elements along the northbound direction of I-91 and eastbound direction of I-691 within the limits as described below. • The proposed project limits begin on I-91 NB from the junction of the on-ramp from Route 15 NB (MP 19.6) to the Middletown rest area (MP 21.42) for approximately 1.8 miles. • The proposed project limits begin on I-691 EB off-ramp (MP 0.02) and extend to its junction with I-91 NB for approximately 0.4 miles. PURPOSE AND NEED: The purpose of this project is to reduce congestion for the traffic movement at the left-handed off-ramp from I-691 EB to I-91 NB and along I-91 NB mainline and address associated safety concerns within the proposed project limits. The project intends to complete the following: • Reduce traffic congestion to achieve a Level of Service (LOS) of D or better by design year 2051.
[Show full text]
Economic Development 2017-18 Business Profile
Economic Development 2017-18 Business Profile Rocky Hill Connecticut. Family Focused with a Corporate Presence… ROCKY HILL, CT. From corporate office parks to Dinosaur State Park and historic Ferry Park along the CT River, Rocky Hill continues to accommodate growth Rocky Hill is a suburban community of 21,000 residents located in central Connecticut two hours from both Boston and New York City. Access is and community reinvestment without provided directly from Interstate 91 while Bradley International Airport is sacrificing our small town a twenty minute drive. Our location within Connecticut and within New atmosphere. Through prudent England places Rocky Hill businesses within 500 miles to 1/3 of the U.S. management, we maintain a low tax economy and 2/3 of the Canadian economy. rate and a commitment to business while maintaining an exemplary Rocky Hill is home to 1300 business establishments employing over 18,000 people. Our substantial employment base consists of diverse industries education system and a high quality and service establishments such as Henkel North America, Arburg, SYSCO, of life. URS Corporation, Burris Refrigerated Logistics, AECOM, Simoniz USA, PDQ Inc., The Meredith Corporation, McKesson, Paychex, Regus, Walmart and Sheraton, among many others. All of our businesses are located within our six business parks and two commercial corridors. Rocky Hill is primarily A market analysis projected an additional 1.8 million square feet of new residential with a 33% development is possible by the year 2030. It is anticipated 2017-19 will commercial tax base. realize the completion of approximately 252,000 square feet of commercial Residents and businesses construction.
[Show full text]
East Acton Village Plan
TOWN OF ACTON EAST ACTON VILLAGE PLAN East Acton Village Planning Committee Acton Planning Department January, 2004 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………..1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……….....………..……………….………………………………..5 ACRONYMS LIST AND GLOSSARY……………………………..…………………………6 EAST ACTON VILLAGE (EAV) PLAN SUMMARY - "THE PLAN AT A GLANCE"....11 CHAPTER 1: HISTORY OF EAV AND THE PLANNING AREA………..…..………….30 Introduction and Summary..................................................................................30 1500 - 1619.........................................................................................................31 1620 - 1674.........................................................................................................31 1675 - 1774.........................................................................................................32 1775 - 1829.........................................................................................................32 1830 - 1869.........................................................................................................33 1870 - 1914.........................................................................................................34 1915 - 1949.........................................................................................................35 1950 +.................................................................................................................36 EAV Historic Resources - Draft Proposed List, January 25, 2004............. ......….37
[Show full text]