2020 05 EXILES Late Stravinsky

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2020 05 EXILES Late Stravinsky Exiles from Revolution Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming This is the last of five sessions about exiles from the October Revolution. Again, the primary focus is on Stravinsky – this time his brief return to the USSR in 1962. A decade earlier the idea of some sort of rapprochement between Stravinsky and Soviet Music would have been almost inconceivable – how would a composer pursuing modernism have fitted into the frozen conservatism of Stalinist Socialist Realism? Even with the Khrushchev Thaw, how would Stravinsky’s latest style be accepted by Soviet critics? Along the way this session encounters another exile, Volkonsky, whose family returned to the USSR, and who took up the challenge of bringing modernism to the USSR. We will end with one of Stravinsky’s final works, Requiem Canticles, a ritual which links back to Les Noces, which was covered in Session 3. © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 2 Stravinsky and the USSR before the homecoming From the late 1920s, Stravinsky, the émigré, was purged from the Soviet repertoire. He was attacked by musicologists. In 1933 Советская Музыка / Soviet Music carried an article by Arnold Alshvang, which started: ”Stravinsky is an important and almost complete artistic ideologist of the imperialist bourgeoisie”. [Schwarz p 354] In the mid 1930s, when he was writing An Autobiography, Stravinsky seems quite relaxed about the Bolsheviks. His book contains one explicit criticism: as a patriot, desperately humiliated … by the monstrous Peace of Brest-Litovsk… [Stravinsky p 73] And Stravinsky is almost whimsical about his lack of success in USSR: From this I conclude that a change of regime cannot change the truth of the old adage that no man is a prophet in his own country [Stravinsky p 141] Stravinsky’s attitude changed in the late 1930s as Socialist Realism was unveiled in the USSR, and as he emigrated to the USA. © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 3 Stravinsky on Socialist Realism In his Norton Lectures at Harvard, in autumn 1939, Stravinsky was dismissive of Socialist Realism, the new Soviet orthodoxy: According to present Russian mentality, there are basically two formulas that explain what music is: [a] … Kolkhosians [collective farm workers] surrounded by tractors and automachines (that is the term) dancing with a reasonable gaiety (in keeping with the requirements of communist dignity) to the accompaniment of a people’s chorus [b] … an elevated style… called upon “to contribute to the formation of the human personality imbued with the environment of its great epoch”. And Stravinsky gleefully quoted a recent description of Shostakovich’s Fifth Symphony by Alexis Tolstoy: Here we have the “Symphony of Socialism”. It begins with the Largo of the masses working underground… The Allegro in its turn symbolises gigantic factory machinery and its victory over nature. The Adagio represents the synthesis of Soviet culture, science and art… As for the Finale, it is the image of the gratitude and the enthusiasm of the masses. [Stravinsky Poetics p 114-5] © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 4 Late Stalinism 1948 was an important year in Soviet Music. The Union of Soviet Composers was given a new leadership, tasked with bringing everyone in line with a stricter late-Stalin era interpretation of Socialist Realism. Boris Asafiev was the new Chairman of the USC. In the 1920s he had been a great champion of Stravinsky, so, to toe the new line, he had to disavow any earlier convictions. He denounced Stravinsky (along with a legion of other Western artists and thinkers) as an obscurantist and fascist. [Hakobian p 179] Tikhon Khrennikov was the new General Secretary of the USC. In his first speech in the new post he specifically damned Stravinsky. Rite of Spring expresses Russian “Asianism” in boisterous chaotic intentionally coarse screaming sonorities. Khrennikov also attacked Stravinsky’s other “Russian” works: Petrushka, Les Noces, Rossignol, Mavra… [Schwarz p 225] © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 5 The Thaw The Khrushchev Thaw gradually brought Stravinsky back into polite society. In 1955 Rodion Shchedrin in Советская Музыка / Soviet Music argued for distinguishing youthful Stravinsky “the disciple of Rimsky Korsakov”, from the later Stravinsky “the enemy of his homeland”. [Schwarz p 286] In 1956 leading musicologist Pavel Apostolov argued for being open to early modernism: Debussy, Ravel, Mahler, Strauss and Stravinsky… but drawing a line at Western music written after the mid 1920s: “the gangrened appendix of decadence”. [Schwarz p 306] After years of isolation, the USSR had the self-confidence to resume cultural exchanges. Musical visitors included: 1957 Glenn Gould 1958 Stokowski 1959 Bernstein, and the New York Philharmonic Bernstein programmed Stravinsky’s Rite of Spring and Piano Concerto the first time these works had been performed in the USSR since the 1920s. © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 6 An Invitation Stravinsky found himself involved in one of these cultural exchanges in Los Angeles. In June 1961, he conducted a couple of his own works: Violin Concerto and Symphony of Psalms. Soviet composers Tikhon Khrennikov and Kara Karayev also had works in the same concert. Stravinsky wrote to his old friend, Pierre Suvchinsky Hopeless music by Khrennikov and Karaev. This is incredible rubbish, which I couldn’t escape, particularly because they visited my place the day before for dinner and they invited me to celebrate my eightieth birthday with them in Moscow … what a horror … I do not believe that this invitation signals a sincere and final change towards me and my music because Khrennikov isn’t Yudina, and because the Shostakovich cult isn’t a myth. It is horrible to have to smile when I want to vomit. [letter 12 June 1961, quoted Ivashkin p 12] Just one week later Stravinsky wrote to Suvchinsky again. He’d received an official invitation. Furthermore, he’d accepted it! [VS & Craft p 469] Before setting off to Moscow Stravinsky said: Nostalgia has no part in my proposed visit to Russia. My wish to go is due primarily to the evidence I have received of a genuine desire or need for me by the younger generation of Russian musicians. No artist’s name has been more abused in the Soviet Union than mine, but one cannot achieve anything with the Russians by nursing a grudge. [Schwarz p 355] © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 7 1962 Visit: the concerts Stravinsky’s visit to the USSR was for three weeks in September and October 1962. That was just before the Cuban missile crisis. Highlights of the visit: Performances of Stravinsky’s music – four concerts in Moscow, and two in Leningrad Bolshoi visit to hear Prokofiev’s War and Peace Lectures to composers … we’ll come back to this later. Leningrad excursions: Lomonosov (Oranienbaum) the town where Stravinsky was born, And a visit to his niece Xenia who lived a few doors away from his former St Petersburg home by the Kryukov Canal. The concerts were performed by the Moscow Philharmonic and the Leningrad Philharmonic. Stravinsky conducted most of the music. His assistant, Robert Craft, helped rehearse the orchestras, and conducted the public performances of a couple of works. The works were selected by the orchestras. Stravinsky commented later that he would have preferred to have included some of his recent works but these were considered too far outside the players’ experience. © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 8 1962 Visit: the concerts The works I have found listed for these concerts in various sources are: Fireworks (1909) Firebird (1910) Petrushka (1911) Rite of Spring (1913) conducted Craft Volga Boatmen (1917) Le Baiser de la fée (1928) conducted Craft Capriccio (1929) soloist Tatyana Nikolayeva Ode (1943) Symphony in Three Movements (1946) Orpheus (1947) The inclusion of neo-classical works, from Le Baiser de la fée to Orpheus, shows that Soviet officialdom was now reconciled to this aspect of his creative style. While the Soviet orchestras felt uncomfortable performing Stravinsky’s latest works, the New York City Ballet presented Agon (1957) a few weeks later, during their eight week 1962 tour. © 2020 Terry Metheringham [email protected] +44 7528 835 422 Soviet Music: Exiles from Revolution Session 5: Stravinsky; the modernist’s homecoming 9 1962 Visit: the concerts The concerts were a huge success; the audience packed with celebrities, and recorded for television. There were so many curtain calls at the end of the first concert in Moscow that Stravinsky finally put on his overcoat to demonstrate he was expecting to leave very soon. His final words to the audience: “you can’t imagine how happy I am today”. [Walsh p 465] The New York Times
Recommended publications
  • Thesis October 11,2012
    Demystifying Galina Ustvolskaya: Critical Examination and Performance Interpretation. Elena Nalimova 10 October 2012 Submitted in partial requirement for the Degree of PhD in Performance Practice at the Goldsmiths College, University of London 1 Declaration The work presented in this thesis is my own and has not been presented for any other degree. Where the work of others has been utilised this has been indicated and the sources acknowledged. All the translations from Russian are my own, unless indicated otherwise. Elena Nalimova 10 October 2012 2 Note on transliteration and translation The transliteration used in the thesis and bibliography follow the Library of Congress system with a few exceptions such as: endings й, ий, ый are simplified to y; я and ю transliterated as ya/yu; е is е and ё is e; soft sign is '. All quotations from the interviews and Russian publications were translated by the author of the thesis. 3 Abstract This thesis presents a performer’s view of Galina Ustvolskaya and her music with the aim of demystifying her artistic persona. The author examines the creation of ‘Ustvolskaya Myth’ by critically analysing Soviet, Russian and Western literature sources, oral history on the subject and the composer’s personal recollections, and reveals paradoxes and parochial misunderstandings of Ustvolskaya’s personality and the origins of her music. Having examined all the available sources, the author argues that the ‘Ustvolskaya Myth’ was a self-made phenomenon that persisted due to insufficient knowledge on the subject. In support of the argument, the thesis offers a performer’s interpretation of Ustvolskaya as she is revealed in her music.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Notebook
    Network Notebook Fall Quarter 2018 (October - December) 1 A World of Services for Our Affiliates We make great radio as affordable as possible: • Our production costs are primarily covered by our arts partners and outside funding, not from our affiliates, marketing or sales. • Affiliation fees only apply when a station takes three or more programs. The actual affiliation fee is based on a station’s market share. Affiliates are not charged fees for the selection of WFMT Radio Network programs on the Public Radio Exchange (PRX). • The cost of our Beethoven and Jazz Network overnight services is based on a sliding scale, depending on the number of hours you use (the more hours you use, the lower the hourly rate). We also offer reduced Beethoven and Jazz Network rates for HD broadcast. Through PRX, you can schedule any hour of the Beethoven or Jazz Network throughout the day and the files are delivered a week in advance for maximum flexibility. We provide highly skilled technical support: • Programs are available through the Public Radio Exchange (PRX). PRX delivers files to you days in advance so you can schedule them for broadcast at your convenience. We provide technical support in conjunction with PRX to answer all your distribution questions. In cases of emergency or for use as an alternate distribution platform, we also offer an FTP (File Transfer Protocol), which is kept up to date with all of our series and specials. We keep you informed about our shows and help you promote them to your listeners: • Affiliates receive our quarterly Network Notebook with all our program offerings, and our regular online WFMT Radio Network Newsletter, with news updates, previews of upcoming shows and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosenobituary
    From Standpoint (a British Magazine) Music A Fusion of Piano and Cerebellum NORMAN LEBRECHT March 2013 Charles Rosen: He could pick a fight in an empty room Days after Charles Rosen's death in December, videos began to appear in which the master pianist was seen holding forth in accent-free French on the music of Pierre Boulez, in Italian on the problems of music criticism and in robust Upper West Side English on practically every topic known to man, at irrepressible length and with irrefutable authority. Charles was the epitome of the philosopher-pianist, a hybrid species that risks extinction with his passing and which deserves more concentrated attention than he himself accorded it, and in much shorter sentences. So there. Charles was, first off, a pianist. Steeped in the grand tradition by the Liszt pupil Moriz Rosenthal, and drawn to the Russian fantasy by the playing of Josef Hofmann, he imposed an incontrovertible immediacy on whatever he played, be it Bach's Goldberg Variations or the constipated chordal sequences of middle-period Elliott Carter. His manner of playing made you believe that this piece could go no other way. A friend who heard him play on ill-tuned Oxford college pianos observes that, of all modern pianists, only Sviatoslav Richter possessed that monumental rightness in performance — that sense of having received the truth from source and, simultaneously, asserting that it would never sound the same again, that its centre of gravity would shift as the earth turns. If you can afford the ICA Classics release of Richter's Festival Hall Beethoven recital of June 18, 1975 you will hear exactly what is meant by this rightness.
    [Show full text]
  • Apologyof CULTURE
    199 West 8th Avenue, Suite 3, Eugene, OR 97401 PICKWICK Publications Tel. (541) 344-1528 • Fax (541) 344-1506 An imprint of WIPF and STOCK Publishers Visit our Web site at www.wipfandstock.com Contemporary philosophy and theology are ever more conscious of the fact that the model of relations between religion and culture developed in modernity is fundamentally flawed. e processes of the secularization of society, culture, and even religion are rooted in the dualistic vision of religion and culture introduced in the late Middle Ages. In seeking a way out, we need to explore domains of culture unaffected by Western European secular thinking. Russian thought is remarkably well prepared to formulate an alternative to secular modernity. Indeed, in Russian culture there was neither a Renaissance nor an Enlightenment. Eastern Christianity retained an integral patristic vision of human nature that had not been divided into separate “natural” and “supernatural” elements. ese pre- and non-modern visions are now gaining exceptional value in the postmodern reality in which we find ourselves. e heritage of Russian Christian thought may serve as a source of inspiration for alternative approaches to religion and culture. In this respect, Russian thought may be compared with nouvelle théologie, Radical Orthodoxy, and other recent movements in Christian postsecular thought. For this reason it remains astonishingly contemporary. APOLOGY of CULTURE Religion and Culture in Russian ought edited by Artur Mrówczyński-Van Allen, Teresa Obolevitch, & Paweł Rojek “Apology of Culture is a timely volume addressing the unity of theology and culture in the conditions of extreme secularization of all forms of life.
    [Show full text]
  • Dmitry Shostakovich's <I>Twenty-Four Preludes and Fugues</I> Op. 87
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Student Research, Creative Activity, and Performance - School of Music Music, School of Spring 4-23-2010 Dmitry Shostakovich's Twenty-Four Preludes and Fugues op. 87: An Analysis and Critical Evaluation of the Printed Edition Based on the Composer's Recorded Performance Denis V. Plutalov University of Nebraska at Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/musicstudent Part of the Composition Commons Plutalov, Denis V., "Dmitry Shostakovich's Twenty-Four Preludes and Fugues op. 87: An Analysis and Critical Evaluation of the Printed Edition Based on the Composer's Recorded Performance" (2010). Student Research, Creative Activity, and Performance - School of Music. 27. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/musicstudent/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Music, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Student Research, Creative Activity, and Performance - School of Music by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. DMITRY SHOSTAKOVICH'S TWENTY-FOUR PRELUDES AND FUGUES, OP. 87: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITICAL EVALUATION OF THE PRINTED EDITION BASED ON THE COMPOSER'S RECORDED PERFORMANCE by Denis V. Plutalov A Doctoral Document Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Musical Arts Major: Music Under the Supervision of Professor Mark Clinton Lincoln, Nebraska May 2010 Dmitry Shostakovich's Twenty-Four Preludes and Fugues op. 87: An Analysis and Critical Evaluation of the Printed Edition Based on the Composer's Recorded Performance Denis Plutalov, D.
    [Show full text]
  • 02-18-09 Babayan.Qxp
    Wednesday, February 18, 2009 at 8:00 p.m. CIM Opera Theater Mixon Hall FACULTY RECITAL presents a S ERGEI B ABAYAN, piano D O This concert is dedicated to the beloved memory of Luiza Markaryan. U Program B L VLADIMIR RYABOV Fantasy in C minor, Op. 21, E (b.1950) (In memory of Maria Yudina) ~ Cleveland premiere B I SCHUBERT - LISZT(transcriptions)Der Müller und der Bach (1797 - 1828) (1811 - 1886) L Gretchen am Spinnrade L Auf dem Wasser zu singen WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 25 - SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 28 AT 8:00 P.M ~ I N T E R M I S S I O N ~ Join CIM Opera Theater students with director, David Bamberger and the CIM Orchestra, with music director Harry Davidson, in fully-staged JEAN-PHILIPPE RAMEAU Suite No. 2 in A minor, from productions of Haydn’s The Apothecary and Puccini’s Suor Angelica. All (1683 - 1764) "Nouvelles suites de pièces opera productions feature projected English translations, so you won’t de clavecin" (ca. 1728) miss a word! * Allemande The Apothecary Haydn's delightful comedy goes beyond Courante the "eternal triangle" to the "eternal rectangle." Sarabande No less than three suitors vie for the hand of the lovely Grilletta. Les trois mains See how she finds her way to true love when faced with the old apothecary who is her guardian, a rich young dandy, Fanfarinette and an apprentice who is too shy to "pop the question!” La triomphante Gavotte et 6 doubles + Suor Angelica The quiet life of a convent is shattered by the intrusion of the outside world.
    [Show full text]
  • Film: the Death of Stalin
    FILM: THE DEATH OF STALIN FDG RATING: 3.2 JJJ Film Discussion Group (FDG) Scale is 1-5 (5 is best) Armando Iannucci: director/co-writer Steve Buscemi: actor, Nikita Khrushchev Simon Russell Beale: actor, Lavrentiy Beria Jeffrey Tambor: actor, Georgy Malenkov DATE: April 22, 2018 DISCUSSION SUMMARY: THE DEATH OF STALIN The Death of Stalin is a clever, raucous political lampoon about bumbling Moscow bureaucrats, backstabbing their way to the top of the heap in an elaborate frantic power struggle to become the next Soviet leader when their tyrannical dictator, Joseph Stalin. drops dead. Among the contenders are sadistic secret police chief Beria who, accompanied by babbling CP Central Committee bigwig Malenkov (Arrested Development’s Jeffrey Tambor), take charge of the situation. Moscow Party Head Nikita Khrushchev (Steve Buscemi) arrives with the rest of the Committee, except for Foreign Minister Molotov, whom Stalin added to his list of enemies the previous night. If these names ring a bell and you can form an historical/political context for the actions that followed, you will have a greater appreciation for the satirical humor that crowds the entire film. The rest of us were at a disadvantage and felt that we were missing a lot of the clever parody and double entendre. But it was just so entertaining, most us laughed out loud anyway. No one really knows what happened behind those heavy red curtains (Wikipedia’s explanation of each character’s role is very helpful) so director/co-writer Armando Iannucci lets the slapstick roll as the farce unfolds while funeral arrangements are made and Stalin’s unstable son Vasily and daughter Svetlana are dealt with.
    [Show full text]
  • MARIA YUDINA ANNIVERSARY EDITION Phonodocuments 10 Cds
    mel cd 10 02590 MARIA YUDINA ANNIVERSARY EDITION phonodocuments 10 CDs ИСКУССТВО МАРИИ ЮДИНОЙ Но играть, играть среди и для людей можно только языком и напряжением своей эпохи. Мария Юдина Представить искусство Марии Вениаминовны Юдиной (1899–1970) во всей широте ее пианистического наследия – основная цель коллекции. Ее по праву можно назвать уникальной – и в подборе ранее не изданных запи- сей (Прелюдии, соч. 11 Скрябина, сочинения Андрея Волконского, Антона Веберна, концертные записи «Хорошо темперированного клавира» Баха), и в присутствии редкостей даже для коллекционеров юдинского искусства (в первую очередь это ее интерпретации Первого концерта для фортепи- ано с оркестром Чайковского, Вариаций Моцарта на тему менуэта Жана-Луи Дюпора, «Вариаций на русскую тему» Бетховена, сочинений К. Сероцкого, К. Шимановского…). Вопреки устоявшемуся мнению об избирательности репертуарных предпо- чтений Юдиной, круг композиторов, чью музыку она исполняла, был чрез- вычайно широк: от И. С. Баха и его предшественников до музыки авангарда ХХ века. Вот лишь некоторые факты. На выпускном сольном концерте (по оконча- нии Петроградской консерватории по классу фортепиано у Л. В. Николаева в 1921 году; ранее училась у В. Н. Дроздова, А. Н. Есиповой, Ф. М. Блуменфельда) 3 Юдина исполнила избранные прелюдии и фуги из «Хорошо темперированного клавира» Баха, Прелюдию и фугу ре минор Глазунова, Сонату си минор Листа. Позже пианистка неоднократно включала эти сочинения в свои филармони- ческие клавирабенды, а ХТК Баха оставался в ее репертуаре на протяжении всей ее артистической жизни. Однако первые записи Юдиной были осущест- влены только в конце 1930-х годов, и мы, наверное, никогда не услышим ее интерпретаций Фантазии фа минор, Прелюдий, соч. 28 Шопена, си-минорной Сонаты и «По прочтении Данте» Листа, Сонаты фа минор Брамса, органных транскрипций и сочинений Бузони, Восьмой сонаты Прокофьева… В 1920– 1930 годы на сценах Москвы и Ленинграда в ее исполнении состоялись пре- мьеры сочинений И.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Musical Geniuses Struggle to Survive1 Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975) Vladimir Sofrinitsky (1901-1961) Maria Yudina (1899-1970)
    1 187a. IN SAURON’S EYE 1920 – c. 1970, Soviet Russia Three musical geniuses struggle to survive1 Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975) Vladimir Sofrinitsky (1901-1961) Maria Yudina (1899-1970) Few journeys better illustrate the perils of personal and artistic integrity in a police state than the careers of Vladimir Sofronitsky, Maria Yudina and Dmitri Shostakovich. At any moment, on the whim of a Party Secretary or Committee, they were lifted to dizzy heights or plunged to depths that threatened not only their lives but all evidence they had existed. Like Rebecca Burstein, who knew them well, the three began as students at the Petrograd Conservatory in the wake of the 1917 Revolution. They ended, deeply scarred, after the so- called Thaw. Mitya ‘Mitya’ Shostakovich entered the Conservatory in Fall 1919 at thirteen – a tubercular undersized boy who seemed so frail that Glazunov petitioned Maxim Gorky and Narkempros Commissar Lunacharsky for special rations to “build up his strength.” He was in the same piano class as Sofronitsky and Yudina, his seniors by six years. The next spring he witnessed with a thousand others their dueling graduation performances of Liszt’s C-minor Piano Sonata, and apparently was transfixed by envious admiration that lasted 50 years. The bar they set contributed to his decision to give up performing when he received only an honorable mention in his first international piano competition (Warsaw, 1927). But the frailty masked steel. By 1927 Shostakovich had been composing for a decade. His earliest known piece – a nonconforming ‘funeral march’ for Kadets murdered by Bolsheviks (1918) – was followed by a flurry of others during his seven years at the Conservatory.
    [Show full text]
  • City Research Online
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Lingas, A. (2015). An Introduction to Passion Week, Opus 13 by Maximilian Steinberg (1883–1946). In: Morosan, V. and Lingas, A. (Eds.), Maximilian Steinberg, Opus 13, Based on Early Russian Chants (Musical Score). (pp. vii-xviii). San Diego, CA, USA: Musica Russica. ISBN 978-0-9701767-5-2 This is the submitted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/16597/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Steinberg Intro Page 1 of 29 Introduction to Passion Week, Opus 13 by Maximilian Steinberg (1883–1946)1 Alexander Lingas, City University London & EHRC, University of Oxford Over the last few decades there has been an international revival of interest in what Vladimir Morosan has called
    [Show full text]
  • 115. February-March 2014
    LCJE Bulletin Issue 115, February-March 2014 Networking Jewish Evangelism LCJELausanne Consultation on Jewish Evangelism Networking Jewish Evangelism From the Coordinator This issue includes the 2013 annual reports from our LCJE Area Coordinators from around the world, as well as a great deal of infor- LCJELausanne Consultation mation about upcoming events during 2014. on Jewish Evangelism *** SAVE THE DATES! *** Our 10th LCJE International LCJE Bulletin Conference is now set for Israel from 16-21 August 2015. Issue No. 115 February-March 2014 Despite the current upheavals in Ukraine, we are still planning, God willing, to hold this year’s LCJE European Regional Conference in © Lausanne Consultation on Kiev, starting on April 28, 2014. Please pray for all the decisions Jewish Evangelism and issues to be worked out for this conference. Pray especially for our Europe Area Coordinator, Jean-Paul Rempp, and our Ukrainian Editor: Jim Melnick hosts, who have all worked very hard, despite the current difficul- Design: Chris Skjøtt ties in Ukraine, to try to make this a successful conference. The conference theme is: “Jesus, Still Today a Light to His People in a Printed by: Wave Printing & Post-Shoah Era.” Graphics, Fredericksburg, VA USA Speaking of successful conferences, we just completed the 2014 LCJE North American conference, held in Wheaton, Illinois, near Published February, May, Chicago, under North American Coordinator Gary Hedrick’s wonder- August, and November ful leadership, along with his fine staff. The conference theme was: “The New Testament’s Use of the Old Testament (OT): How are the Address: P.O. Box 5501 OT Passages Messianic?” Despite the bitter cold temperatures, the Falmouth, VA 22403 USA conference was very well attended, including an invitation extend- ed to the Wheaton College student body.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Booklet
    PRELUDES & FUGUES Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) Prelude and Fugue in C sharp minor, BWV849 7:30 1 I. Prelude 2:56 2 II. Fugue 4:33 Johann Sebastian Bach (1685-1750) transcribed by Franz Liszt(1811-1886) Organ Prelude and Fugue in A minor, S. 462 No. 1 10:38 3 I. Prelude 3:42 4 II. Fugue 6:57 César Franck (1822-1890) Prélude, choral et fugue 21:32 5 I. Prélude - 5:35 6 II. Choral - 7:18 7 III. Fugue 8:39 Dmitri Shostakovich (1906-1975) Prelude and Fugue in C minor, Op. 87 No. 20 10:53 8 I. Prelude 4:50 9 II. Fugue 6:02 bonus tracks: Sergei Rachmaninoff (1873-1943) 10 Étude-Tableau in G minor, Op. 33 No. 7 3:41 11 Étude-Tableau in C sharp minor, Op. 33 No. 8 3:10 total playing time: 57:25 NATALIA ANDREEVA piano The Music This CD includes piano works — Preludes and Fugues and two of Rachmaninoff’s Étude-Tableaux — which were learned and performed at different stages of my life: in St. Petersburg (Russia), in Chicago and in Sydney. They were all recorded in the former Melodiya recording studio in St. Petersburg (located at the St. Catherine Lutheran Church) — the same studio where I recorded the complete piano works by the Russian composer Galina Ustvolskaya, released by Divine Art in 2015. Here, in these program notes, my aim is not to make an analysis of these piano works (so many great books have been written and much research has been done!).
    [Show full text]