Environmental Assessment Report KGZ: CAREC Transport Corridor I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Environmental Assessment Report KGZ: CAREC Transport Corridor I Environmental Assessment Report Initial Environmental Examination Project Number: 39674 July 2008 KGZ: CAREC Transport Corridor I (Bishkek–Torugart Road) Project Prepared by the Ministry of Transport and Communications for the Asian Development Bank (ADB). The initial environmental examination is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (As of July 2008) Currency Unit – Kyrgyz Som (Som) 35.2 Som = $ 1 $100 = 3520 Som The exchange rate of the Kyrgyz Som is determined under a floating exchange rate system. In this report, the rate used is the rate prevailing at the above date. LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED ADB Asian Development Bank о С Degrees of Celsius CAR Central Asian Republics cm Centimeter CSE Construction Supervision Engineers DEM Department of Ecological Monitoring (under SAEPF) EA Environmental Assessment EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement ESC Environmental Statement of Consequences ha Hectare KHM Kyrgyz Agency on Hydrometeorology (under MOES) km Kilometer km/h Kilometers per hour KR Kyrgyz Republic m Meter mg/m3 Milligrams per cubic meter MOH Ministry of Health of KR MOES Ministry of Emergency Situations of KR MOTC Ministry of Communication and Transport of KR NGO Non-Governmental Organization PIU Project Implementation Unit PRC People’s Republic of China RP Resettlement Plan SAEPF State Agency for Environment Protection & Forestry of KR SANEPID Department of Sanitary and Epidemiologic Control under MOH SER State Environmental Review SPA Specially Protected Area USD US Dollar TA Technical Assistance NOTE (i) In this report, “$” refers to U.S. Dollars. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS...........................................................................................................................3 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................6 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE PROJECT ...........................................................................................................6 1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT .......................................................................................................6 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT.............................................................................................7 2.1 CATEGORY AND TYPE OF PROJECT ..............................................................................................7 2.2 NEED FOR THE PROJECT ............................................................................................................8 2.3 PROJECT LOCATION ....................................................................................................................8 3 ENVIRONMENTAL LEGAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK............................12 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT...................................................................................12 3.1.1 Legal Framework of EA in KR............................................................................................12 3.1.2 Institutional Framework of EA in KR .................................................................................12 3.1.3 Application of the EA Legislation .......................................................................................12 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION................................................................................................14 4 DESCRIPTION OF THE POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT..........................14 4.1 PHYSICAL RESOURCES..............................................................................................................14 4.1.1 Topography..........................................................................................................................14 4.1.2 Seismic and Geological Characteristics.............................................................................15 4.1.3 Soils and Permafrost ...........................................................................................................16 4.1.4 Air Quality and Climate ......................................................................................................17 4.1.5 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................20 4.1.6 Natural Hazards ..................................................................................................................21 4.1.7 Noise and Vibration.............................................................................................................25 4.2 ECOLOGIC RESOURCES .............................................................................................................26 4.2.1 Fauna...................................................................................................................................26 4.2.2 Flora ....................................................................................................................................26 4.2.3 Ecosystems...........................................................................................................................27 4.2.4 Protected Areas....................................................................................................................29 4.3 ECONOMIC RESOURCES.............................................................................................................29 4.3.1 Industries and Agriculture...................................................................................................29 4.3.2 Tourism ................................................................................................................................30 4.3.3 Transport Networks .............................................................................................................30 4.3.4 Land Use..............................................................................................................................30 4.4 SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RESOURCES........................................................................................31 4.4.1 Population and Communities..............................................................................................31 4.4.2 Cultural and Historical Values............................................................................................31 5 ALTERNATIVES............................................................................................................................31 5.1 NO ACTION ALTERNATIVE ........................................................................................................31 5.2 LOCATION ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................32 5.3 TECHNOLOGICAL ALTERNATIVES .......................................................................................33 6 IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND MITIGATION...........................................................................33 6.1 SCREENING POTENTIAL IMPACTS..............................................................................................33 6.2 ANTICIPATED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ..................................................................36 6.3 IMPACTS ON PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT .....................................................................................36 6.3.1 Topography..........................................................................................................................36 6.3.2 Soils and Permafrost ...........................................................................................................37 6.3.3 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................39 6.3.4 Climate and Air Quality ......................................................................................................40 6.3.5 Natural Disasters.................................................................................................................42 6.3.6 Noise and Vibration.............................................................................................................43 6.4 ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS ..............................................................................................................45 3 6.4.1 Flora ....................................................................................................................................45 6.4.2 Fauna...................................................................................................................................45 6.4.3 Ecosystems...........................................................................................................................45 6.4.4 Protected Areas....................................................................................................................46 6.5 SOCIO – ECONOMIC IMPACTS.....................................................................................................46 6.5.1 International Trade..............................................................................................................46 6.5.2 Industry, Agriculture, and Services.....................................................................................47 6.5.3 Tourism ................................................................................................................................47
Recommended publications
  • Snow Leopards and Other Animals of the Tien Shan Mountains of Kyrgyzstan
    EXPEDITION REPORT Expedition dates: 9 June – 23 August 2014 Report published: June 2015 Mountain ghosts: protecting snow leopards and other animals of the Tien Shan mountains of Kyrgyzstan . EXPEDITION REPORT Mountain ghosts: protecting snow leopards and other animals of the Tien Shan mountains of Kyrgyzstan Expedition dates: 9 June – 23 August 2014 Report published: June 2015 Authors: Volodymyr Tytar I.I Schmalhausen Institute of Zoology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine Matthias Hammer Biosphere Expeditions 1 © Biosphere Expeditions, an international not-for-profit conservation organisation registered in England, Germany, France, Australia and the USA Officially accredited member of the United Nations Environment Programme's Governing Council & Global Ministerial Environment Forum Officially accredited member of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature Abstract This study was part of an expedition to the Tien Shan Mountains (Kyrgyz Ala-Too range), run by Biosphere Expeditions and NABU from 9 June to 23 August 2014 with the aim of surveying for snow leopard (Uncia uncia) and its prey species such as argali (Ovis ammon) and Siberian ibex (Capra sibirica). Using a cell methodology adopted by Biosphere Expeditions for volunteer expeditions, 77 cells of 2 x 2 km were surveyed and 22 interviews with local people were conducted. The surveys yielded no evidence of snow leopard (camera trap photos, tracks, scrapes, marking places, etc.), but the interviews indicated that snow leopard was present in the area and confirmed the importance of the area as a habitat for snow leopard. The surveys also showed that the area’s habitat is sufficiently varied and capable of sustaining a healthy prey base for the snow leopard as well as for other carnivores such as the wolf.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTRY SECTION Kyrgyzstan Game Trophies Plants
    Validity date from COUNTRY Kyrgyzstan 17/05/2018 00030 SECTION Game trophies plants Date of publication 17/05/2018 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 0005207 «SUPA» Ltd. S. Alikenov Bishkek Bishkek CAT2, CAT3 19/03/2013 000712 Kyrgyzohotorybolovsoiuz Federation Of Hunters And Fishers Of Bishkek Bishkek CAT2, CAT3 19/07/2011 The Kyrgyz Republic Zadorozhny N.N. 0010026 «KALPEN» Ltd. Bishkek Bishkek CAT2, CAT3 15/11/2016 0013894 «Joon-Terek» Ltd. Jalal-Abad Kyrgyzstan (general) CAT2, CAT3 28/08/2015 001680 «Eki Uul» Ltd. Tokmok Chuy CAT2, CAT3 24/10/2013 0016878 «Mountain Tour- -Talas» Ltd Bishkek Bishkek CAT2, CAT3 13/10/2015 ГРЮ 0025278 «Dibo Petfud» Ltd. Bishkek Bishkek CAT2, CAT3 16/05/2018 0034368 «Youg Eko Hant» Ltd. O. Sabirov Osh Osh CAT2, CAT3 06/08/2012 0038638 «Diana Travel» Ltd. A.V. Barykin Karakol Ysyk-Kol CAT2, CAT3 17/10/2011 003973 Kina Grupp Ltd. Bishkek Bishkek CAT2, CAT3 16/05/2018 0040129 «Burhan» Ltd. A.V.Barykin Karakol Ysyk-Kol CAT2, CAT3 17/10/2011 0049696 Baigeldi LTD Mambetakunov R. At-Bashy Naryn CAT2, CAT3 25/07/2011 0049784 «Argali» Ltd. B. Sydygaliev Naryn Naryn CAT2, CAT3 27/02/2012 0051379 Central Asian Safari Club LTD Godunin R. Karakol Ysyk-Kol CAT2, CAT3 10/10/2011 0055964 Hunting DepartmentBoshkoev S.T. Bishkek Bishkek CAT2, CAT3 19/07/2011 1 / 3 List in force Approval number Name City Regions Activities Remark Date of request 006487 Mountain Of Cholponbek Ltd. M. Omurakunov Naryn Naryn CAT2, CAT3 21/12/2012 0072537 Muflon LTD Kaldybaeva А.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Framework for Free Economic Zones and Industrial Parks in the Kyrgyz Republic
    Strategic Framework for Free Economic Zones and Industrial Parks in the Kyrgyz Republic Free economic zones that can be transformed into clusters of highly competitive traded firms can contribute significantly to industrial diversification and regional development of the Kyrgyz Republic. This strategic framework outlines strategies and policies for leveraging them to enhance productivity and promote regional development. The framework involves six pillars for integrating free economic zones and industrial parks: (i) using a sustainable development program with a mix of bottom–up and top–down approaches; (ii) enhancing the investment climate by ensuring the development of sound legal and regulatory frameworks, better institutional designs, and coordination; (iii) using a proactive approach with global value chains and upgrading along them by strengthening domestic capabilities; (iv) forming regional and cross-border value chains; (v) developing a sound implementation strategy; and (vi) establishing a sound monitoring and evaluation framework. About the Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Program The Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation (CAREC) Program is a partnership of 11 member countries and development partners working together to promote development through cooperation, leading to accelerated economic growth and poverty reduction. It is guided by the overarching vision of “Good Neighbors, Good Partners, and Good Prospects.” CAREC countries include: Afghanistan, Azerbaijan, the People’s Republic of China, Georgia, Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, Mongolia, Pakistan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. ADB serves as the CAREC Secretariat. About the Asian Development Bank ADB’s vision is an Asia and Pacific region free of poverty. Its mission is to help its developing member countries reduce poverty and improve the quality of life of their people.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Development of Kyrgyzstan: Investment and Financing
    Address: IIASA, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria Email: [email protected] Department: Advanced Systems Analysis | ASA Working paper Industrial Development of Kyrgyzstan: Investment and Financing Nadejda Komendantova, Sergey Sizov, Uran Chekirbaev, Elena Rovenskaya, Nikita Strelkovskii, Nurshat Karabashov, Nurlan Atakanov, Zalyn Zheenaliev and Fernando Santiago Rodriguez WP-18-013 October 05, 2018 Approved by: Name: Albert van Jaarsveld Program: Director General and Chief Executive Officer Address: IIASA, Schlossplatz 1, A-2361 Laxenburg, Austria Email: [email protected] Department: Advanced Systems Analysis | ASA Table of contents Acknowledgments ......................................................................................................... 3 1. Overview of investment climate ................................................................................. 4 2. Drivers and instruments for investment ...................................................................... 9 3. Barriers for investment ............................................................................................ 13 4. Socially and environmentally sustainable investment ................................................. 18 5. Key messages ......................................................................................................... 20 References ................................................................................................................. 22 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial
    [Show full text]
  • Bishkek–Osh Road) Improvement Project, Phase 4 (RRP KGZ 45169) Initial Environmental Examination
    Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation Corridor 3 (Bishkek–Osh Road) Improvement Project, Phase 4 (RRP KGZ 45169) Initial Environmental Examination P45169-KGZ TA 8107-KGZ August 2013 KGZ: CAREC Corridor 3 (Bishkek–Osh Road) Improvement Project, Phase 4 (Bishkek–Kara-Balta Section) The IEE is an update of the IEE report disclosed on ADB and MOTC website in August 2013 available on http://www.adb.org/projects/45169-001/documents. Prepared By the KOCKS Consult GmbH for ADB and Ministry of Transport and Communications of the Kyrgyz Republic. The IEE is a document of the Borrower. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................1 A. BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................1 B. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE REQUIREMENTS .........................................................3 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROJECT ...................................................................................6 A. OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................................6 B. TYPE AND CATEGORY OF PROJECT .............................................................................6 C. NEED FOR PROJECT .......................................................................................................7 D. LOCATION .........................................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region
    Water Resources Lifeblood of the Region 68 Central Asia Atlas of Natural Resources ater has long been the fundamental helped the region flourish; on the other, water, concern of Central Asia’s air, land, and biodiversity have been degraded. peoples. Few parts of the region are naturally water endowed, In this chapter, major river basins, inland seas, Wand it is unevenly distributed geographically. lakes, and reservoirs of Central Asia are presented. This scarcity has caused people to adapt in both The substantial economic and ecological benefits positive and negative ways. Vast power projects they provide are described, along with the threats and irrigation schemes have diverted most of facing them—and consequently the threats the water flow, transforming terrain, ecology, facing the economies and ecology of the country and even climate. On the one hand, powerful themselves—as a result of human activities. electrical grids and rich agricultural areas have The Amu Darya River in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan, with a canal (left) taking water to irrigate cotton fields.Upper right: Irrigation lifeline, Dostyk main canal in Makktaaral Rayon in South Kasakhstan Oblast, Kazakhstan. Lower right: The Charyn River in the Balkhash Lake basin, Kazakhstan. Water Resources 69 55°0'E 75°0'E 70 1:10 000 000 Central AsiaAtlas ofNaturalResources Major River Basins in Central Asia 200100 0 200 N Kilometers RUSSIAN FEDERATION 50°0'N Irty sh im 50°0'N Ish ASTANA N ura a b m Lake Zaisan E U r a KAZAKHSTAN l u s y r a S Lake Balkhash PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC Ili OF CHINA Chui Aral Sea National capital 1 International boundary S y r D a r Rivers and canals y a River basins Lake Caspian Sea BISHKEK Issyk-Kul Amu Darya UZBEKISTAN Balkhash-Alakol 40°0'N ryn KYRGYZ Na Ob-Irtysh TASHKENT REPUBLIC Syr Darya 40°0'N Ural 1 Chui-Talas AZERBAIJAN 2 Zarafshan TURKMENISTAN 2 Boundaries are not necessarily authoritative.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Kyrgyzstan in 2015
    2015 Minerals Yearbook KYRGYZSTAN [ADVANCE RELEASE] U.S. Department of the Interior August 2019 U.S. Geological Survey The Mineral Industry of Kyrgyzstan By Karine M. Renaud Kyrgyzstan is a landlocked mountainous country with limited On April 23, 2014, the Parliament passed the “Glacier energy and transportation infrastructure. In 2014, gold remained Law,” which prohibits activities that cause damage to glaciers. the most valuable mineral mined in Kyrgyzstan. Other mineral Under the law, if glaciers are damaged, the companies who commodities produced in the country were clay, coal, fluorspar, are responsible are required to pay compensation at a rate gypsum, lime, mercury, natural gas, crude petroleum, sand and determined by the Government. Centerra Gold Inc. (Centerra) gravel, and silver (table 1; AZoMining, 2013; Gazprom PJSC, of Canada (the operator of the Kumtor Mine) could be affected 2015; Reichl and others, 2016). by the law because the Kumtor Mine bisects a glacier. The law remained to be signed by the Government before it takes effect, Minerals in the National Economy and no signing date had yet been specified (Lazenby, 2014; Marketwired, 2015). Kyrgyzstan’s real gross domestic product (GDP) increased by In 2015, the Russian Government approved a bill to create the 3.5% in 2015 compared with an increase of 4.0% (revised) in $1 billion Russian-Kyrgyz Development Fund. The Russian- 2014. The nominal GDP was $5.58 billion1 in 2015. Industrial Kyrgyz Development Fund is a lending program geared toward output decreased by 1.4% in 2015 compared with an increase the development of infrastructure, small- and medium-size of 5.7% in 2014, and it accounted for 15% of the GDP.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Ancient Settlement of Ak-Beshim (Chu River Valley, Northern Kyrgyzstan)
    New data on the ancient settlement of Ak-Beshim (Chu River Valley, Northern Kyrgyzstan) Bakyt Amanbaeva Institute of History, Archaeology and Ethnology of the National Academy of Sciences of Kyrgyz Republic Bishkek, Kyrgyz Republic KG Abstract According to the archaeological data, a series of ancient settlement appeared on the territory of the Chu River Valley (Dzhety-Suu, Semirechie) in VI-VIII centuries. Some of them were composed of the citadel and shakhristan and transformed later (IX-XI centuries) into the territories surrounded with one-two rings of so-called “long walls” with considerable size in the perimeter. Of these cities was Suyab, which ruins correspond to the ancient settlement of Ak-Bashim known as a capital of three Turkic Khaganates in VI-X centuries: Western Turkic, Türgesh and Karluk. Scientific studies were implemented by Kyrgyz (National Academy of Sciences) and Janapese (National Research Institute for Cultural Properties, Tokyo and Teikyo University since 2016) archaeologists. Excavation site No 15 put in place on the territory of shakhristan No 2 revealed the concentration of grey-clay tile, which corresponds to the remains of the collapsed wall of the building. Probably, the revealed construction may the component of the garden-park ensemble of the Tang Dynasty Period. Analysis of the aerial photo of 1967 and further geophysical studies of the territory of the “second” Buddhist temple have shown that it was a part of the larger complex with the walls of 140-150 m in length. As the result of the excavation site No 18 the revealed temple was occupying only its south-western corner, while another construction the role of which has to be identified during the further archaeological studies, was situated nearby.
    [Show full text]
  • 42399-023: CAREC Transport Corridor I (Bishkek-Torugart Road
    Completion Report Project Number: 42399-023 Loan Number: 2755 Loan Number: 3204 Grant Number: 0418 March 2019 Kyrgyz Republic: CAREC Corridor 1 (Bishkek– Torugart Road) Project 3 This document is being disclosed to the public in accordance with ADB's Access to Information Policy. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS Currency Unit – som (Som) At Appraisal Additional Financing At Project Completion (25 April 2011) (30 October 2014) (31 December 2017) Som1.00 = $0.0213 $0.0177 $0.0145 $1.00 = Som46.916 Som56.508 Som69.140 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CAREC – Central Asia Regional Economic Cooperation CPS – country partnership strategy EIA – environmental impact assessment EIRR – economic internal rate of return EMP – environment management plan ICB – international competitive bidding ICS – individual consultant selection IPIG – Investment Projects Implementation Group IRI – international roughness index KJSNR – Karatal-Japaryk State Nature Reserve LARP – land acquisition and resettlement plan MOTR – Ministry of Transport and Roads NLA – normative legal act PBM – performance-based maintenance PCR – project completion review PRC – People’s Republic of China SDR – special drawing right TOR – terms of reference VOC – vehicle operating cost NOTES (i) The fiscal year (FY) of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and its agencies ends on 31 December. “FY” before a calendar year denotes the year in which the fiscal year ends, e.g., FY2017 ends on 31 December 2017. (ii) In this report, “$” refers to United States dollars. Vice-President S. Chen, Operations 1 Director General W. E. Liepach, Central and West Asia Regional Department (CWRD) Director C. McDeigan, Kyrgyz Resident Mission, CWRD Sector Director D. S. Pyo, Transport and Communications Division, CWRD Team leader M.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Cooperation in Adaptation to Climate
    STRENGTHENING COOPERATION IN ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE IN TRANSBOUNDARY BASINS OF THE CHU AND TALAS RIVERS KAZAKHSTAN AND KYRGYZSTAN Summary Strengthening Cooperation in Adaptation to Climate Change in Transboundary Basins of the Chu and Talas Rivers, Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan Summary © Zoї Environment Network, 2014 Summary of the full report on the “Strengthening Cooperation in Adaptation to Climate Change in Transboundary Basins of the Chu and Talas Rivers (Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan)” was prepared by Zoї Environment Network in close cooperation with the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) Water Convention Secretariat and the authors of the full report and experts of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan in the framework of the Environment and Security Initiative (ENVSEC ). Financial This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part in any form Authors of the full report: Svetlana Dolgikh, Auelbek Zaurbek, support was provided by the Government of Finland. for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission Alexsandr Kalashnikov (Kazakhstan), Shamil Iliasov, Nurdudin from the copyright holders, provided acknowledgement of the Karabaev, Ekaterina Sahvaeva, Gulmira Satymkulova, Valerii source is made. UNECE and partners would appreciate receiving a Shevchenko (Kyrgyzstan) copy of any material that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any commercial Original text of summary: Lesya Nikolayeva with the participation purpose whatsoever without prior permission in written form from of Viktor Novikov, Nickolai Denisov (Zoї Environment Network) the copyright holders. The use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products for advertising is not permitted. Russian editing: Marina Pronina The views expressed in this document are those of the authors Translation into English: Elena Arkhipova and do not necessarily reflect views of the partner organizations and governments.
    [Show full text]
  • Pliocenepleistocene Initiation, Style, and Sequencing of Deformation In
    PUBLICATIONS Tectonics RESEARCH ARTICLE Pliocene-Pleistocene initiation, style, 10.1002/2013TC003394 and sequencing of deformation Key Points: in the central Tien Shan • Dates of folded terraces constrain structure timing Joseph K. Goode1, Douglas W. Burbank1, and Cholponbek Ormukov2 • Geologic and geodetic deformation rates are consistent 1Department of Earth Science, University of California, Santa Barbara, California, USA, 2Central-Asian Institute for Applied • Naryn basin structures originated about 1 Ma Geoscience, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan Abstract In response to the Indo-Asian collision, deformation of the Tien Shan initiated at ~25 Ma along Correspondence to: the northwestern margin of the Tarim Basin. 300 km north, the Kyrgyz Range began deforming ~15 Ma later. J. K. Goode, Although multiple intervening structures across the Tien Shan are currently active, the sequencing of initial [email protected] deformation across the orogen’s entire width remains poorly known. To determine whether deformation migrated sequentially northward or developed less predictably, we documented deformation patterns Citation: within the Naryn Basin in south-central Kyrgyzstan. Detailed mapping and a published balanced cross section Goode, J. K., D. W. Burbank, and C. Ormukov (2014), Pliocene-Pleistocene across the Naryn Basin suggest that deep-seated, relatively steeply dipping thrust faults have disrupted the initiation, style, and sequencing of defor- basin during late Cenozoic deformation. Dating of deformed fluvial terraces with ages between ~10 and 250 ka mation in the central Tien Shan, Tectonics, constrains the rate of deformation across relatively young structures in the Tien Shan interior. Based on geodetic 33, 464-484, doi:10.1002/2013TC003394. surveys of dated terraces, local rates of relative rock uplift span from 0.3 to 3.5 mm/yr.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Situation Update 24 Ap
    DISASTER RESPONSE COORDINATION UNIT Kyrgyzstan: COVID-19 response Weekly situation update Date: 24 April 2020 This update is issued by the DRCU and summarizes current situation, DRCU and other partners’ support to the response effort for the period of 17-24 April 2020. Key statistics As of 24 April 2020 Total cases 700 Total number of 656 656 confirmed cases of 600 COVID-19 554 500 The number of new 25 419 cases from total 400 300 The number of human 8 216 losses 200 147 100 The number of 322 0 recovered cases 17-Mar 24-Mar 31-Mar 7-Apr 14-Apr 21-Apr On 18 March 2020 the first three cases were recorded in the Kyrgyz Republic that were detected among those, who returned from Umra pilgrimage to Saudi Arabia. Kyrgyzstan’s Age group Number % from Security Council recommended the state of emergency on 22 March, total and the Government subsequently imposed stricter measures, placing checkpoints in every region and city, and shutting down Under 15 75 11.4 facilities (cafes, cinemas, shopping malls, and other entertainment From 16 to 19 18 2.7 places), leaving only grocery stores, food markets, pharmacies, and medical facilities. From 20 to 35 179 27.3 From 35 to 55 On 14 April based on the Decrees of the President of the Kyrgyz 239 36.4 Republic, the state of emergency in Bishkek, Osh, Jalal-Abad cities Above 55 145 22.1 and Kara-Suu, Nookat districts of Osh oblast, Suzak district of Jalal- Abad oblast has been extended until 30 April 2020.
    [Show full text]