DOCSLIB.ORG

SEMILATTICE DECOMPOSITIONS of SEMIGROUPS first Edition, 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SEMILATTICE DECOMPOSITIONS of SEMIGROUPS first Edition, 2011 Stojan M. Bogdanovi´c, PhD, full professor Faculty of Economics, University of Niˇs Miroslav D. Ciri´c´ , PhD, full professor Faculty of Sciences and Mathematics, University of Niˇs Zarkoˇ Lj. Popovi´c, PhD, associate professor Faculty of Economics, University of Niˇs SEMILATTICE DECOMPOSITIONS OF SEMIGROUPS first edition, 2011 Published by: Faculty of Economics, University of Niˇs For the publisher: Evica Petrovi´c,PhD, Dean Editor-in-Chief: Ljiljana Stankovi´c,PhD Reviewers: Petar Proti´c,PhD Predrag Stanimirovi´c,PhD Jelena Ignjatovi´c,PhD Proofreading: Marta Dimitrijevi´c,MA Printed by: M Kops Centar, Niˇs Circulation: 100 ISBN 978-86-6139-032-6 ⃝c 2011, Faculty of Economics, University of Niˇs All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invited, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher and the authors. This monograph was supported by Ministry of Education and Science, Republic of Serbia, Grant No. 174013. Stojan M. Bogdanovi´c Miroslav D. Ciri´c´ Zarkoˇ Lj. Popovi´c SEMILATTICE DECOMPOSITIONS OF SEMIGROUPS Niˇs,2011 Preface General decomposition problems hold a central place in the general struc- ture theory of semigroups, as they look for different ways to break a semi- group into parts, with as simple a structure as possible, in order to ex- amine these parts in detail, as well as the relationships between the parts within the whole semigroup. The main problem is to determine whether the greatest decomposition of a given type exists, the decomposition having the finest components, and to give a characterization and construction of this greatest decomposition. Another important issue is whether a given type of decomposition is atomic, in the sense that the components of the greatest decomposition of the given type cannot further be broken down by decom- position of the same type. In semigroup theory only five types of atomic decompositions are known so far. The atomicity of semilattice decomposi- tions was proved by Tamura [Osaka Math. J. 8 (1956) 243{261], of ordinal decompositions by Lyapin [Semigroups, Fizmatgiz, Moscow, 1960], of the so-called U-decompositions by Shevrin [Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 138 (1961) 796{798], of orthogonal decompositions by Bogdanovi´cand Ciri´c[Israel´ J. Math 90 (1995) 423{428], whereas the atomicity of subdirect decompositions follows from a more general result of universal algebra proved by Birkhoff [Bull. AMS 50 (1944) 764{768]. Semilattice decompositions of semigroups were first defined and studied by A. H. Clifford [Annals of Math. 42 (1941) 1037{1049]. Later T. Tamura and N. Kimura [Kodai Math. Sem. Rep. 4 (1954) 109{112] proved the existence of the greatest semilattice decompo- sition of an arbitrary semigroup, and as we have already noted, while T. Tamura [Osaka Math. J. 8 (1956) 243{261] proved the atomicity of semilat- tice decompositions. The theory of the greatest semilattice decompositions of semigroups has been developed from the middle of the 1950s to the middle i ii PREFACE of the 1970s by T. Tamura, M. S. Putcha, M. Petrich, and others. For a long time after that there were no new results in this area. In the mid of 1990s, the authors of this book initiated the further development of this theory by introducing completely new ideas and methodology. The purpose of this book is to give an overview of the main results on semilattice decompositions of semigroups which appeared in the last 15 years, as well as to connect them with earlier results. The structure of the book is as follows. The first three chapters of the book provide an introduction to the basic concepts of semigroup theory, var- ious types of regularity and the concepts of simple, 0-simple, Archimedean and 0-Archimedean semigroups. Chapter 4 develops the general theory of the greatest semilattice decompositions of semigroups, using the methodol- ogy that was built by the authors. This methodology is based on the compu- tation of the principal radicals of a semigroup, which is an iterative process that, in general, may consist of infinitely many iterations. For this reason, later this chapter discusses the various cases where the greatest semilattice decompositions can be achieved by methods that involve only finitely many iterations. The first effective construction of the smallest semilattice congruence on a semigroup, provided by T. Tamura [Semigroup Forum 4 (1972) 255{ 261], was based on the arrow relation !, which was defined as a natural generalization of the division relation. Namely, two elements a and b of a semigroup are said to be in the relation !, written as a ! b, if the element b divides some power of the element a. If each pair of elements of a semigroup is in that relation, then this semigroup is said to satisfy the famous Archimedean property, which Archimedes proved for natural numbers, and such a semigroup is called an Archimedean semigroup. In the above mentioned paper, T. Tamura proved that the smallest semilattice congruence on a semigroup can be constructed as the symmetric opening of the transitive closure of the arrow relation, whereas M. S. Putcha [Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 189 (1974), 93{106] showed that these two operations can be permuted, i.e., the smallest semilattice congruence can be computed as the transitive closure of the symmetric opening of the arrow relation. In Chapter 4 the authors discuss various situations where the transitive closure of the arrow relation can be computed in a finite number of steps, and in Chapter 5 they consider the situation when the arrow relation is transitive. PREFACE iii Semigroups with the latter property are actually semigroups that can be represented as a semilattice of Archimedean semigroups. Chapter 5 also deals with various special types of semilattices of Archimedean semigroups. A particular case of Archimedean semigroups are semigroups in which each element divides a fixed power of any other element, and such semigroups are called k-Archimedean. The semilattices of k-Archimedean semigroups and many of their special cases are studied in Chapter 6. A very important special case of semilattices of Archimedean semigroups are semilattices of completely Archimedean semigroups, or equivalently, se- milattices of nil-extensions of completely simple semigroups. At a scientific conference held back in 1977, L. N. Shevrin announced that a semigroup can be decomposed into a semilattice of completely Archimedean semigroups if and only if each of its elements has a regular power, and each of its regular elements is completely regular (i.e., belongs to a subgroup of this semigroup). However, this result along with other related results was published with proof 17 years later [Mat. Sbornik 185 (8) (1994) 129{160, 185 (9) (1994) 153{176]. In the meantime, other authors have studied these decompositions building their own methodology, for example J. L. Galbiati and M. L. Veronesi [Rend. Ist. Lomb. Cl. Sc. (A) 116 (1982) 180{189; Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma (4) 10 (1984) 319{329], and others. The first author of this book began his research in this area in 1985, and later the other two authors joined him. In a series of papers, the authors of this book built their own methodology, which not only led to the same results announced by L. N. Shevrin, but also provided some significant improvements. A complete theory of the decompositions of a semigroup into a semilattice of completely Archimedean semigroups was presented for the first time in the book by the first two authors [Semigroups, Prosveta, Niˇs,1993]. Chapter 7 of this book outlines not only these results, but also many results obtained later. The authors wish to express their gratitude to Professors Petar Proti´c, Predrag Stanimirovi´cand Jelena Ignjatovi´c,for their valuable comments and suggestions. Niˇs,On Saint Petka, 2011 Authors iv PREFACE Contents Preface i Contents v 1 Introduction 1 1.1 The Definition of a Semigroup . 1 1.2 Semigroups of Relations and Mappings . 7 1.3 Congruences and Homomorphisms . 12 1.4 Maximal Subgroups and Monogenic Semigroups . 17 1.5 Ordered Sets and Lattices . 20 1.6 Ideals . 30 1.7 Ideal and Retractive Extensions of Semigroups . 39 1.8 Green's Relations . 46 2 Regularity on Semigroups 53 2.1 π-regular Semigroups . 54 2.2 Completely π-regular Semigroups . 59 2.3 The Union of Groups . 64 2.4 π-inverse Semigroups . 67 2.5 Quasi-regular Semigroups . 74 2.6 Idempotent Generated Semigroups . 77 2.7 Left Regular Semigroups . 80 v vi CONTENTS 3 (0)-Archimedean Semigroups 85 3.1 Completely 0-simple Semigroups . 86 3.2 0-Archimedean Semigroups . 96 3.3 Archimedean Semigroups . 104 3.4 Semigroups in Which Proper Ideals are Archimedean . 111 4 The Greatest Semilattice Decompositions of Semigroups 119 4.1 Principal Radicals and Semilattice Decompositions of Semigroups . 121 4.2 Semilattices of σn-simple Semigroups . 132 4.3 Semilattices of λ-simple Semigroups . 139 4.4 Chains of σ-simple Semigroups . 146 4.5 Semilattices of σbn-simple Semigroups . 149 4.6 Semilattices of λb-simple Semigroups . 153 4.7 The Radicals of Green's J -relation . 155 5 Semilattices of Archimedean Semigroups 159 5.1 The General Case . 160 5.2 Semilattices of Hereditary Archimedean Semigroups . 175 5.3 Semilattices of Weakly Left Archimedean Semigroups . 179 5.4 Semilattices of Left Completely Archimedean Semigroups . 186 5.5 Bands of Left Archimedean Semigroups . 188 6 Semilattices of k-Archimedean Semigroups 205 6.1 k-Archimedean Semigroups . 207 6.2 Bands of Jk-simple Semigroups . 211 6.3 Bands of Lk-simple Semigroups . 217 6.4 Bands of Hk-simple Semigroups .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Finite Basis Problem for Finite Semigroups
    The Finite Basis Problem for Finite Semigroups M. V. Volkov Abstract We provide an overview of recent research on the natural question what makes a finite semigroup have finite or infinite identity basis. An emphasis is placed on results published since 1985 when the previous comprehensive survey of the area had appeared. We also formulate several open problems. This is an updated version of July 2014 of the original survey pub- lished in 2001 in Sci. Math. Jap. 53, no.1, 171–199. The updates (marked red in the text) mainly concern problems that were solved meanwhile and new publications in the area. The original text (in black) has not been changed. Introduction In his Ph.D. thesis [1966] Perkins proved that the 6-element Brandt monoid 1 B2 formed by the 2 × 2-matrix units 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 , , , , 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 together with the zero and the identity 2 × 2-matrices, admits no finite set of laws to axiomatize all identities holding in it [see also Perkins, 1969]. His striking discovery strongly contrasted with another fundamental achieve- ment of the equational theory of finite algebras which had appeared shortly before: we mean Oates and Powell’s theorem [1964] that the identities of each finite group are finitely axiomatizable. It was this contrast that gave rise to numerous investigations whose final aim was to classify all finite semigroups with respect to the property of having/having no finite identity basis. Even though those investigations have not yet led to a solution to this major problem, they have resulted in extremely interesting and often surprising developments.
    [Show full text]
  • ON F-DERIVATIONS from SEMILATTICES to LATTICES
    Commun. Korean Math. Soc. 29 (2014), No. 1, pp. 27–36 http://dx.doi.org/10.4134/CKMS.2014.29.1.027 ON f-DERIVATIONS FROM SEMILATTICES TO LATTICES Yong Ho Yon and Kyung Ho Kim Abstract. In this paper, we introduce the notion of f-derivations from a semilattice S to a lattice L, as a generalization of derivation and f- derivation of lattices. Also, we define the simple f-derivation from S to L, and research the properties of them and the conditions for a lattice L to be distributive. Finally, we prove that a distributive lattice L is isomorphic to the class SDf (S,L) of all simple f-derivations on S to L for every ∧-homomorphism f : S → L such that f(x0) ∨ f(y0) = 1 for ∼ some x0,y0 ∈ S, in particular, L = SDf (S,L) for every ∧-homomorphism f : S → L such that f(x0) = 1 for some x0 ∈ S. 1. Introduction In some of the literature, authors investigated the relationship between the notion of modularity or distributivity and the special operators on lattices such as derivations, multipliers and linear maps. The notion and some properties of derivations on lattices were introduced in [10, 11]. Sz´asz ([10, 11]) characterized the distributive lattices by multipliers and derivations: a lattice is distributive if and only if the set of all meet- multipliers and of all derivations coincide. In [5] it was shown that every derivation on a lattice is a multiplier and every multiplier is a dual closure. Pataki and Sz´az ([9]) gave a connection between non-expansive multipliers and quasi-interior operators.
    [Show full text]
  • On Free Quasigroups and Quasigroup Representations Stefanie Grace Wang Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2017 On free quasigroups and quasigroup representations Stefanie Grace Wang Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Wang, Stefanie Grace, "On free quasigroups and quasigroup representations" (2017). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 16298. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/16298 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. On free quasigroups and quasigroup representations by Stefanie Grace Wang A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Mathematics Program of Study Committee: Jonathan D.H. Smith, Major Professor Jonas Hartwig Justin Peters Yiu Tung Poon Paul Sacks The student author and the program of study committee are solely responsible for the content of this dissertation. The Graduate College will ensure this dissertation is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2017 Copyright c Stefanie Grace Wang, 2017. All rights reserved. ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to the Integral Liberal Arts Program. The Program changed my life, and I am forever grateful. It is as Aristotle said, \All men by nature desire to know." And Montaigne was certainly correct as well when he said, \There is a plague on Man: his opinion that he knows something." iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES .
    [Show full text]
  • Class Semigroups of Prufer Domains
    JOURNAL OF ALGEBRA 184, 613]631Ž. 1996 ARTICLE NO. 0279 Class Semigroups of PruferÈ Domains S. Bazzoni* Dipartimento di Matematica Pura e Applicata, Uni¨ersita di Pado¨a, ¨ia Belzoni 7, 35131 Padua, Italy Communicated by Leonard Lipshitz View metadata, citation and similar papers at Receivedcore.ac.uk July 3, 1995 brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector The class semigroup of a commutative integral domain R is the semigroup S Ž.R of the isomorphism classes of the nonzero ideals of R with the operation induced by multiplication. The aim of this paper is to characterize the PruferÈ domains R such that the semigroup S Ž.R is a Clifford semigroup, namely a disjoint union of groups each one associated to an idempotent of the semigroup. We find a connection between this problem and the following local invertibility property: an ideal I of R is invertible if and only if every localization of I at a maximal ideal of Ris invertible. We consider the Ž.a property, introduced in 1967 for PruferÈ domains R, stating that if D12and D are two distinct sets of maximal ideals of R, Ä 4Ä 4 then F RMM <gD1 /FRMM <gD2 . Let C be the class of PruferÈ domains satisfying the separation property Ž.a or with the property that each localization at a maximal ideal if finite-dimensional. We prove that, if R belongs to C, then the local invertibility property holds on R if and only if every nonzero element of R is contained only in a finite number of maximal ideals of R.
    [Show full text]
  • Noncommutative Unique Factorization Domainso
    NONCOMMUTATIVE UNIQUE FACTORIZATION DOMAINSO BY P. M. COHN 1. Introduction. By a (commutative) unique factorization domain (UFD) one usually understands an integral domain R (with a unit-element) satisfying the following three conditions (cf. e.g. Zariski-Samuel [16]): Al. Every element of R which is neither zero nor a unit is a product of primes. A2. Any two prime factorizations of a given element have the same number of factors. A3. The primes occurring in any factorization of a are completely deter- mined by a, except for their order and for multiplication by units. If R* denotes the semigroup of nonzero elements of R and U is the group of units, then the classes of associated elements form a semigroup R* / U, and A1-3 are equivalent to B. The semigroup R*jU is free commutative. One may generalize the notion of UFD to noncommutative rings by taking either A-l3 or B as starting point. It is obvious how to do this in case B, although the class of rings obtained is rather narrow and does not even include all the commutative UFD's. This is indicated briefly in §7, where examples are also given of noncommutative rings satisfying the definition. However, our principal aim is to give a definition of a noncommutative UFD which includes the commutative case. Here it is better to start from A1-3; in order to find the precise form which such a definition should take we consider the simplest case, that of noncommutative principal ideal domains. For these rings one obtains a unique factorization theorem simply by reinterpreting the Jordan- Holder theorem for right .R-modules on one generator (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Semigroup C*-Algebras and Amenability of Semigroups
    SEMIGROUP C*-ALGEBRAS AND AMENABILITY OF SEMIGROUPS XIN LI Abstract. We construct reduced and full semigroup C*-algebras for left can- cellative semigroups. Our new construction covers particular cases already con- sidered by A. Nica and also Toeplitz algebras attached to rings of integers in number fields due to J. Cuntz. Moreover, we show how (left) amenability of semigroups can be expressed in terms of these semigroup C*-algebras in analogy to the group case. Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Constructions 4 2.1. Semigroup C*-algebras 4 2.2. Semigroup crossed products by automorphisms 7 2.3. Direct consequences of the definitions 9 2.4. Examples 12 2.5. Functoriality 16 2.6. Comparison of universal C*-algebras 19 3. Amenability 24 3.1. Statements 25 3.2. Proofs 26 3.3. Additional results 34 4. Questions and concluding remarks 37 References 37 1. Introduction The construction of group C*-algebras provides examples of C*-algebras which are both interesting and challenging to study. If we restrict our discussion to discrete groups, then we could say that the idea behind the construction is to implement the algebraic structure of a given group in a concrete or abstract C*-algebra in terms of unitaries. It then turns out that the group and its group C*-algebra(s) are closely related in various ways, for instance with respect to representation theory or in the context of amenability. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 46L05; Secondary 20Mxx, 43A07. Research supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 878) and by the ERC through AdG 267079.
    [Show full text]
  • Right Product Quasigroups and Loops
    RIGHT PRODUCT QUASIGROUPS AND LOOPS MICHAEL K. KINYON, ALEKSANDAR KRAPEZˇ∗, AND J. D. PHILLIPS Abstract. Right groups are direct products of right zero semigroups and groups and they play a significant role in the semilattice decomposition theory of semigroups. Right groups can be characterized as associative right quasigroups (magmas in which left translations are bijective). If we do not assume associativity we get right quasigroups which are not necessarily representable as direct products of right zero semigroups and quasigroups. To obtain such a representation, we need stronger assumptions which lead us to the notion of right product quasigroup. If the quasigroup component is a (one-sided) loop, then we have a right product (left, right) loop. We find a system of identities which axiomatizes right product quasigroups, and use this to find axiom systems for right product (left, right) loops; in fact, we can obtain each of the latter by adjoining just one appropriate axiom to the right product quasigroup axiom system. We derive other properties of right product quasigroups and loops, and conclude by show- ing that the axioms for right product quasigroups are independent. 1. Introduction In the semigroup literature (e.g., [1]), the most commonly used definition of right group is a semigroup (S; ·) which is right simple (i.e., has no proper right ideals) and left cancellative (i.e., xy = xz =) y = z). The structure of right groups is clarified by the following well-known representation theorem (see [1]): Theorem 1.1. A semigroup (S; ·) is a right group if and only if it is isomorphic to a direct product of a group and a right zero semigroup.
    [Show full text]
  • Semigroup C*-Algebras of Ax + B-Semigroups Li, X
    Semigroup C*-algebras of ax + b-semigroups Li, X © Copyright 2015 American Mathematical Society This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Transactions of the American Mathematical Society following peer review. The version of record is available http://www.ams.org/journals/tran/2016-368-06/S0002-9947-2015-06469- 1/home.html For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/xmlui/handle/123456789/18071 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] SEMIGROUP C*-ALGEBRAS OF ax + b-SEMIGROUPS XIN LI Abstract. We study semigroup C*-algebras of ax + b-semigroups over integral domains. The goal is to generalize several results about C*-algebras of ax + b- semigroups over rings of algebraic integers. We prove results concerning K-theory and structural properties like the ideal structure or pure infiniteness. Our methods allow us to treat ax+b-semigroups over a large class of integral domains containing all noetherian, integrally closed domains and coordinate rings of affine varieties over infinite fields. 1. Introduction Given an integral domain, let us form the ax + b-semigroup over this ring and con- sider the C*-algebra generated by the left regular representation of this semigroup. The particular case where the integral domain is given by the ring of algebraic inte- gers in a number field has been investigated in [C-D-L], [C-E-L1], [C-E-L2], [E-L], [Li4] and also [La-Ne], [L-R].
    [Show full text]
  • Divisibility Theory of Semi-Hereditary Rings
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 138, Number 12, December 2010, Pages 4231–4242 S 0002-9939(2010)10465-3 Article electronically published on July 9, 2010 DIVISIBILITY THEORY OF SEMI-HEREDITARY RINGS P. N. ANH´ AND M. SIDDOWAY (Communicated by Birge Huisgen-Zimmermann) Abstract. The semigroup of finitely generated ideals partially ordered by in- verse inclusion, i.e., the divisibility theory of semi-hereditary rings, is precisely described by semi-hereditary Bezout semigroups. A Bezout semigroup is a commutative monoid S with 0 such that the divisibility relation a|b ⇐⇒ b ∈ aS is a partial order inducing a distributive lattice on S with multiplication dis- tributive on both meets and joins, and for any a, b, d = a ∧ b ∈ S, a = da1 there is b1 ∈ S with a1 ∧ b1 =1,b= db1. S is semi-hereditary if for each a ∈ S there is e2 = e ∈ S with eS = a⊥ = {x ∈ S | ax =0}. The dictionary is therefore complete: abelian lattice-ordered groups and semi-hereditary Be- zout semigroups describe divisibility of Pr¨ufer (i.e., semi-hereditary) domains and semi-hereditary rings, respectively. The construction of a semi-hereditary Bezout ring with a pre-described semi-hereditary Bezout semigroup is inspired by Stone’s representation of Boolean algebras as rings of continuous functions and by Gelfand’s and Naimark’s analogous representation of commutative C∗- algebras. Introduction In considering the structure of rings, classical number theory suggests a careful study of the semigroup of divisibility, defined as the semigroup of principal (or more generally finitely generated) ideals partially ordered by reverse inclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Semilattice Sums of Algebras and Mal'tsev Products of Varieties
    Mathematics Publications Mathematics 5-20-2020 Semilattice sums of algebras and Mal’tsev products of varieties Clifford Bergman Iowa State University, [email protected] T. Penza Warsaw University of Technology A. B. Romanowska Warsaw University of Technology Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/math_pubs Part of the Algebra Commons The complete bibliographic information for this item can be found at https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ math_pubs/215. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Mathematics at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Mathematics Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Semilattice sums of algebras and Mal’tsev products of varieties Abstract The Mal’tsev product of two varieties of similar algebras is always a quasivariety. We consider when this quasivariety is a variety. The main result shows that if V is a strongly irregular variety with no nullary operations, and S is a variety, of the same type as V, equivalent to the variety of semilattices, then the Mal’tsev product V ◦ S is a variety. It consists precisely of semilattice sums of algebras in V. We derive an equational basis for the product from an equational basis for V. However, if V is a regular variety, then the Mal’tsev product may not be a variety. We discuss examples of various applications of the main result, and examine some detailed representations of algebras in V ◦ S.
    [Show full text]
  • Steps in the Representation of Concept Lattices and Median Graphs Alain Gély, Miguel Couceiro, Laurent Miclet, Amedeo Napoli
    Steps in the Representation of Concept Lattices and Median Graphs Alain Gély, Miguel Couceiro, Laurent Miclet, Amedeo Napoli To cite this version: Alain Gély, Miguel Couceiro, Laurent Miclet, Amedeo Napoli. Steps in the Representation of Concept Lattices and Median Graphs. CLA 2020 - 15th International Conference on Concept Lattices and Their Applications, Sadok Ben Yahia; Francisco José Valverde Albacete; Martin Trnecka, Jun 2020, Tallinn, Estonia. pp.1-11. hal-02912312 HAL Id: hal-02912312 https://hal.inria.fr/hal-02912312 Submitted on 5 Aug 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Steps in the Representation of Concept Lattices and Median Graphs Alain Gély1, Miguel Couceiro2, Laurent Miclet3, and Amedeo Napoli2 1 Université de Lorraine, CNRS, LORIA, F-57000 Metz, France 2 Université de Lorraine, CNRS, Inria, LORIA, F-54000 Nancy, France 3 Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRISA, Rue de Kérampont, 22300 Lannion, France {alain.gely,miguel.couceiro,amedeo.napoli}@loria.fr Abstract. Median semilattices have been shown to be useful for deal- ing with phylogenetic classication problems since they subsume me- dian graphs, distributive lattices as well as other tree based classica- tion structures. Median semilattices can be thought of as distributive _-semilattices that satisfy the following property (TRI): for every triple x; y; z, if x ^ y, y ^ z and x ^ z exist, then x ^ y ^ z also exists.
    [Show full text]
  • Measure Algebras of Semilattices with Finite Breadth
    Pacific Journal of Mathematics MEASURE ALGEBRAS OF SEMILATTICES WITH FINITE BREADTH JIMMIE DON LAWSON,JOHN ROBIE LIUKKONEN AND MICHAEL WILLIAM MISLOVE Vol. 69, No. 1 May 1977 PACIFIC JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS Vol. 69, No. 1, 1977 MEASURE ALGEBRAS OF SEMILATTIGES WITH FINITE BREADTH J. D. LAWSON, J. R. LIUKKONEN AND M. W. MlSLOVE The main result of this paper is that if S is a locally compact semilattice of finite breadth, then every complex homomorphism of the measure algebra M(S) is given by integration over a Borel filter (subsemilattice whose comple- ment is an ideal), and that consequently M(S) is a P-algebra in the sense of S. E. Newman. More generally it is shown that if S is a locally compact Lawson semilattice which has the property that every bounded regular Borel measure is concentrated on a Borel set which is the countable union of compact finite breadth subsemilattices, then M(S) is a P-algebra. Furthermore, complete descriptions of the maxi- mal ideal space of M(S) and the structure semigroup of M(S) are given in terms of S, and the idempotent and invertible measures in M(S) are identified. In earlier work Baartz and Newman have shown that if S is the finite product of totally ordered locally compact semilattices, then every complex homomorphism is given by integration over a Borel subsemilattice whose complement is an ideal [1, Th. 3.15], and consequently, the structure semigroup of M(S) in the sense of Taylor [10] is itself a semilattice [9, Th. 3]. In both papers it is shown that such results do not hold for the infinite dimensional cube S — Iω, and Newman conjectures that what is needed for these results to hold is a "finite dimensionality" condition.
    [Show full text]