Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 63/Wednesday, April 1, 2020/Rules

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

18114 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 1, 2020 / Rules and Regulations proposed rulemaking, providing an will preempt in accordance with section § 1232.2 Requirements for children’s opportunity for public comment. 26(a) of the CPSA. folding chairs and stools. Each children’s folding chair and G. Regulatory Flexibility Act K. Effective Date stool shall comply with all applicable The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) Under the procedure set forth in provisions of ASTM F2613–19, generally requires that agencies review section 104(b)(4)(B) of the CPSIA, when Standard Consumer Safety proposed and final rules for their a voluntary standard organization Specification for Children’s Chairs and potential economic impact on small revises a standard upon which a Stools, approved on November 1, 2019. entities, including small businesses, and consumer product safety standard was The Director of the Federal Register prepare regulatory flexibility analyses. 5 based, the revision becomes the CPSC approves this incorporation by reference U.S.C. 603 and 604. The RFA applies to standard within 180 days of notification in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and any rule that is subject to notice and to the Commission, unless the 1 CFR part 51. You may obtain a copy comment procedures under section 553 Commission determines that the of this ASTM standard from ASTM of the APA. Id. As explained, the revision does not improve the safety of International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, Commission has determined that notice the product, or the Commission sets a P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA and comment are not necessary for this later date in the Federal Register. The 19428–2959 USA; phone: 610–832– direct final rule. Thus, the RFA does not statutory effective date of 180 days falls 9585; www.astm.org. A read-only copy apply. We also note the limited nature on July 4, 2020, a legal holiday and a of the standard is available for viewing of this document, which merely updates weekend. Therefore, the Commission is on the ASTM website at https:// the incorporation by reference to reflect setting the effective date of the rule on www.astm.org/READINGLIBRARY/. You the mandatory CPSC standard that takes the next business day, July, 6, 2020. As may inspect a copy at the Division of effect under section 104 of the CPSIA. discussed in the preceding section, this the Secretariat, U.S. Consumer Product is a direct final rule. Unless we receive Safety Commission, Room 820, 4330 H. Paperwork Reduction Act a significant adverse comment within 30 East-West Highway, Bethesda, MD The standard for children’s folding days, the rule will become effective on 20814, telephone 301–504–7923, or at chairs and stools contains information- July 6, 2020. the National Archives and Records collection requirements under the Administration (NARA). For L. The Congressional Review Act Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 information on the availability of this U.S.C. 3501–3520). The revisions made The Congressional Review Act (CRA; material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@ no changes to that section of the 5 U.S.C. 801–808) states that, before a nara.gov, or go to: www.archives.gov/ standard. Thus, the revisions will have rule may take effect, the agency issuing federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html. no effect on the information-collection the rule must submit the rule, and Alberta E. Mills, requirements related to the standard. certain related information, to each Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety I. Environmental Considerations House of Congress and the Comptroller Commission. General. 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1). The [FR Doc. 2020–06334 Filed 3–31–20; 8:45 am] The Commission’s regulations submission must indicate whether the BILLING CODE 6355–01–P provide a categorical exclusion for the rule is a ‘‘major rule.’’ The CRA states Commission’s rules from any that the Office of Information and requirement to prepare an Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) determines DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND environmental assessment or an whether a rule qualifies as a ‘‘major HUMAN SERVICES environmental impact statement where rule.’’ Pursuant to the CRA, this rule they ‘‘have little or no potential for does not qualify as a ‘‘major rule,’’ as Food and Drug Administration affecting the human environment.’’ 16 defined in 5 U.S.C. 804(2). To comply CFR 1021.5(c)(2). This rule falls within with the CRA, the Office of the General 21 CFR Parts 500, 510, 520, 522, 524, the categorical exclusion, so no Counsel will submit the required 526, 556, and 558 environmental assessment or information to each House of Congress environmental impact statement is and the Comptroller General. [Docket No. FDA–2019–N–0002] required. List of Subjects in 16 CFR Part 1232 New Animal Drugs; Approval of New J. Preemption Animal Drug Applications; Withdrawal Consumer protection, Imports, of Approval of New Animal Drug Section 26(a) of the CPSA, 15 U.S.C. Incorporation by reference, Infants and Applications; Change of Sponsor; 2075(a), provides that where a consumer children, Law enforcement, Safety, Change of Sponsors’ Name and product safety standard is in effect and Toys. applies to a product, no state or political Addresses For the reasons stated above, the subdivision of a state may either Commission amends Title 16 CFR AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, establish or continue in effect a chapter II as follows: HHS. requirement dealing with the same risk ACTION: Final rule; technical of injury unless the state requirement is PART 1232—SAFETY STANDARD FOR amendments. identical to the federal standard. Section CHILDREN’S FOLDING CHAIRS AND 26(c) of the CPSA also provides that STOOLS SUMMARY: The Food and Drug states or political subdivisions of states Administration (FDA or we) is may apply to the CPSC for an exemption ■ 1. Revise the authority citation for part amending the animal drug regulations to from this preemption under certain 1232 to read as follows: reflect application-related actions for circumstances. Section 104(b) of the new animal drug applications (NADAs) CPSIA deems rules issued there under Authority: Sec. 104, Pub. L. 110–314, 122 and abbreviated new animal drug Stat. 3016 (15 U.S.C. 2056a); Sec 3, Pub. L. ‘‘consumer product safety rules.’’ 112–28, 125 Stat. 273. applications (ANADAs) during October, Therefore, once a rule issued under November, and December 2019. FDA is section 104 of the CPSIA takes effect, it ■ 2. Revise § 1232.2 to read as follows: informing the public of the availability VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:27 Mar 31, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\01APR1.SGM 01APR1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 63 / Wednesday, April 1, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 18115 of summaries of the basis of approval I. Approval Actions Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and and of environmental review FDA is amending the animal drug Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers documents, where applicable. The regulations to reflect approval actions Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, animal drug regulations are also being for NADAs and ANADAs during between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday amended to make technical October, November, and December through Friday. Persons with access to amendments to improve the accuracy of 2019, as listed in table 1. In addition, the internet may obtain these the regulations. FDA is informing the public of the documents at the CVM FOIA Electronic DATES: This rule is effective March 30, availability, where applicable, of Reading Room: https://www.fda.gov/ 2020. documentation of environmental review about-fda/center-veterinary-medicine/ required under the National cvm-foia-electronic-reading-room. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and, Marketing exclusivity and patent George K. Haibel, Center for Veterinary for actions requiring review of safety or information may be accessed in FDA’s Medicine (HFV–6), Food and Drug effectiveness data, summaries of the publication, Approved Animal Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., basis of approval (FOI Summaries) Products Online (Green Book) at: Rockville, MD 20855, 240–402–5689, under the Freedom of Information Act https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/ [email protected]. (FOIA). These public documents may be products/approved-animal-drug- SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: seen in the office of the Dockets products-green-book. TABLE 1—ORIGINAL AND SUPPLEMENTAL NADAS AND ANADAS APPROVED DURING OCTOBER, NOVEMBER, AND DECEMBER 2019 Public Approval date File No. Sponsor Product name Species Effect of the action documents October 11, 200–652 Huvepharma EOOD, 5th Monensin and Cattle .......... Original approval for use of MONOVET 90 FOI Summary. 2019. Floor, 3A Nikolay decoquinate Type B (monensin Type A medicated article) with Haytov Str., 1113 So- and Type C medicated DECCOX (decoquinate) Type A medicated phia, Bulgaria. feeds. articles in the manufacture of Type B and Type C medicated feeds as a generic copy of NADA 141–148 October 11, 200–653 Do ................................... Monensin, tylosin phos- Cattle .......... Original approval for use of MONOVET 90 FOI Summary. 2019. phate, and (monensin Type A medicated article) with decoquinate Type B TYLOVET (tylosin phosphate) and DECCOX and Type C medicated (decoquinate) Type A medicated articles in feeds. the manufacture of Type B and Type C medicated feeds as a generic copy of NADA 141–149 October 11, 200–654 Do ................................... Monensin and tilmicosin Cattle .......... Original approval for use of MONOVET 90 FOI Summary. 2019. phosphate Type B and (monensin Type A medicated article) with Type C medicated TILMOVET (tilmicosin phosphate) Type A feeds. medicated article in the manufacture of Type B and Type C medicated feeds as a generic copy of NADA 141–343 October 11, 200–655 Do ..................................
Recommended publications
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al

    (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 De Juan Et Al

    US 200601 10428A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2006/0110428A1 de Juan et al. (43) Pub. Date: May 25, 2006 (54) METHODS AND DEVICES FOR THE Publication Classification TREATMENT OF OCULAR CONDITIONS (51) Int. Cl. (76) Inventors: Eugene de Juan, LaCanada, CA (US); A6F 2/00 (2006.01) Signe E. Varner, Los Angeles, CA (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 424/427 (US); Laurie R. Lawin, New Brighton, MN (US) (57) ABSTRACT Correspondence Address: Featured is a method for instilling one or more bioactive SCOTT PRIBNOW agents into ocular tissue within an eye of a patient for the Kagan Binder, PLLC treatment of an ocular condition, the method comprising Suite 200 concurrently using at least two of the following bioactive 221 Main Street North agent delivery methods (A)-(C): Stillwater, MN 55082 (US) (A) implanting a Sustained release delivery device com (21) Appl. No.: 11/175,850 prising one or more bioactive agents in a posterior region of the eye so that it delivers the one or more (22) Filed: Jul. 5, 2005 bioactive agents into the vitreous humor of the eye; (B) instilling (e.g., injecting or implanting) one or more Related U.S. Application Data bioactive agents Subretinally; and (60) Provisional application No. 60/585,236, filed on Jul. (C) instilling (e.g., injecting or delivering by ocular ion 2, 2004. Provisional application No. 60/669,701, filed tophoresis) one or more bioactive agents into the Vit on Apr. 8, 2005. reous humor of the eye. Patent Application Publication May 25, 2006 Sheet 1 of 22 US 2006/0110428A1 R 2 2 C.6 Fig.
  • NINDS Custom Collection II

    NINDS Custom Collection II

    ACACETIN ACEBUTOLOL HYDROCHLORIDE ACECLIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ACEMETACIN ACETAMINOPHEN ACETAMINOSALOL ACETANILIDE ACETARSOL ACETAZOLAMIDE ACETOHYDROXAMIC ACID ACETRIAZOIC ACID ACETYL TYROSINE ETHYL ESTER ACETYLCARNITINE ACETYLCHOLINE ACETYLCYSTEINE ACETYLGLUCOSAMINE ACETYLGLUTAMIC ACID ACETYL-L-LEUCINE ACETYLPHENYLALANINE ACETYLSEROTONIN ACETYLTRYPTOPHAN ACEXAMIC ACID ACIVICIN ACLACINOMYCIN A1 ACONITINE ACRIFLAVINIUM HYDROCHLORIDE ACRISORCIN ACTINONIN ACYCLOVIR ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE ADENOSINE ADRENALINE BITARTRATE AESCULIN AJMALINE AKLAVINE HYDROCHLORIDE ALANYL-dl-LEUCINE ALANYL-dl-PHENYLALANINE ALAPROCLATE ALBENDAZOLE ALBUTEROL ALEXIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE ALLANTOIN ALLOPURINOL ALMOTRIPTAN ALOIN ALPRENOLOL ALTRETAMINE ALVERINE CITRATE AMANTADINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMBROXOL HYDROCHLORIDE AMCINONIDE AMIKACIN SULFATE AMILORIDE HYDROCHLORIDE 3-AMINOBENZAMIDE gamma-AMINOBUTYRIC ACID AMINOCAPROIC ACID N- (2-AMINOETHYL)-4-CHLOROBENZAMIDE (RO-16-6491) AMINOGLUTETHIMIDE AMINOHIPPURIC ACID AMINOHYDROXYBUTYRIC ACID AMINOLEVULINIC ACID HYDROCHLORIDE AMINOPHENAZONE 3-AMINOPROPANESULPHONIC ACID AMINOPYRIDINE 9-AMINO-1,2,3,4-TETRAHYDROACRIDINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMINOTHIAZOLE AMIODARONE HYDROCHLORIDE AMIPRILOSE AMITRIPTYLINE HYDROCHLORIDE AMLODIPINE BESYLATE AMODIAQUINE DIHYDROCHLORIDE AMOXEPINE AMOXICILLIN AMPICILLIN SODIUM AMPROLIUM AMRINONE AMYGDALIN ANABASAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANABASINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANCITABINE HYDROCHLORIDE ANDROSTERONE SODIUM SULFATE ANIRACETAM ANISINDIONE ANISODAMINE ANISOMYCIN ANTAZOLINE PHOSPHATE ANTHRALIN ANTIMYCIN A (A1 shown) ANTIPYRINE APHYLLIC
  • Control of Intestinal Protozoa in Dogs and Cats

    Control of Intestinal Protozoa in Dogs and Cats

    Control of Intestinal Protozoa 6 in Dogs and Cats ESCCAP Guideline 06 Second Edition – February 2018 1 ESCCAP Malvern Hills Science Park, Geraldine Road, Malvern, Worcestershire, WR14 3SZ, United Kingdom First Edition Published by ESCCAP in August 2011 Second Edition Published in February 2018 © ESCCAP 2018 All rights reserved This publication is made available subject to the condition that any redistribution or reproduction of part or all of the contents in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise is with the prior written permission of ESCCAP. This publication may only be distributed in the covers in which it is first published unless with the prior written permission of ESCCAP. A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library. ISBN: 978-1-907259-53-1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 4 1: CONSIDERATION OF PET HEALTH AND LIFESTYLE FACTORS 5 2: LIFELONG CONTROL OF MAJOR INTESTINAL PROTOZOA 6 2.1 Giardia duodenalis 6 2.2 Feline Tritrichomonas foetus (syn. T. blagburni) 8 2.3 Cystoisospora (syn. Isospora) spp. 9 2.4 Cryptosporidium spp. 11 2.5 Toxoplasma gondii 12 2.6 Neospora caninum 14 2.7 Hammondia spp. 16 2.8 Sarcocystis spp. 17 3: ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OF PARASITE TRANSMISSION 18 4: OWNER CONSIDERATIONS IN PREVENTING ZOONOTIC DISEASES 19 5: STAFF, PET OWNER AND COMMUNITY EDUCATION 19 APPENDIX 1 – BACKGROUND 20 APPENDIX 2 – GLOSSARY 21 FIGURES Figure 1: Toxoplasma gondii life cycle 12 Figure 2: Neospora caninum life cycle 14 TABLES Table 1: Characteristics of apicomplexan oocysts found in the faeces of dogs and cats 10 Control of Intestinal Protozoa 6 in Dogs and Cats ESCCAP Guideline 06 Second Edition – February 2018 3 INTRODUCTION A wide range of intestinal protozoa commonly infect dogs and cats throughout Europe; with a few exceptions there seem to be no limitations in geographical distribution.
  • Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr

    Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr

    Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Crizotinib (PF-02341066) 1 4 55 Docetaxel 1 5 98 Anastrozole 1 6 25 Cladribine 1 7 23 Methotrexate 1 8 -187 Letrozole 1 9 65 Entecavir Hydrate 1 10 48 Roxadustat (FG-4592) 1 11 19 Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) 1 12 0 Sunitinib Malate 1 13 34 Vismodegib (GDC-0449) 1 14 64 Paclitaxel 1 15 89 Aprepitant 1 16 94 Decitabine 1 17 -79 Bendamustine HCl 1 18 19 Temozolomide 1 19 -111 Nepafenac 1 20 24 Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 1 21 -43 Lapatinib (GW-572016) Ditosylate 1 22 88 Temsirolimus (CCI-779, NSC 683864) 1 23 96 Belinostat (PXD101) 1 24 46 Capecitabine 1 25 19 Bicalutamide 1 26 83 Dutasteride 1 27 68 Epirubicin HCl 1 28 -59 Tamoxifen 1 29 30 Rufinamide 1 30 96 Afatinib (BIBW2992) 1 31 -54 Lenalidomide (CC-5013) 1 32 19 Vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) 1 33 38 Rucaparib (AG-014699,PF-01367338) phosphate1 34 14 Lenvatinib (E7080) 1 35 80 Fulvestrant 1 36 76 Melatonin 1 37 15 Etoposide 1 38 -69 Vincristine sulfate 1 39 61 Posaconazole 1 40 97 Bortezomib (PS-341) 1 41 71 Panobinostat (LBH589) 1 42 41 Entinostat (MS-275) 1 43 26 Cabozantinib (XL184, BMS-907351) 1 44 79 Valproic acid sodium salt (Sodium valproate) 1 45 7 Raltitrexed 1 46 39 Bisoprolol fumarate 1 47 -23 Raloxifene HCl 1 48 97 Agomelatine 1 49 35 Prasugrel 1 50 -24 Bosutinib (SKI-606) 1 51 85 Nilotinib (AMN-107) 1 52 99 Enzastaurin (LY317615) 1 53 -12 Everolimus (RAD001) 1 54 94 Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) 1 55 24 Thalidomide 1 56 40 Tivozanib (AV-951) 1 57 86 Fludarabine
  • WAAVP2019-Abstract-Book.Pdf

    WAAVP2019-Abstract-Book.Pdf

    27th Conference of the World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology JULY 7 – 11, 2019 | MADISON, WI, USA Dedicated to the legacy of Professor Arlie C. Todd Sifting and Winnowing the Evidence in Veterinary Parasitology @WAAVP2019 @WAAVP_2019 Abstract Book Joint meeting with the 64th American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists Annual Meeting & the 63rd Annual Livestock Insect Workers Conference WAAVP2019 27th Conference of the World Association for the Advancements of Veterinary Parasitology 64th American Association of Veterinary Parasitologists Annual Meeting 1 63rd Annualwww.WAAVP2019.com Livestock Insect Workers Conference #WAAVP2019 Table of Contents Keynote Presentation 84-89 OA22 Molecular Tools II 89-92 OA23 Leishmania 4 Keynote Presentation Demystifying 92-97 OA24 Nematode Molecular Tools, One Health: Sifting and Winnowing Resistance II the Role of Veterinary Parasitology 97-101 OA25 IAFWP Symposium 101-104 OA26 Canine Helminths II 104-108 OA27 Epidemiology Plenary Lectures 108-111 OA28 Alternative Treatments for Parasites in Ruminants I 6-7 PL1.0 Evolving Approaches to Drug 111-113 OA29 Unusual Protozoa Discovery 114-116 OA30 IAFWP Symposium 8-9 PL2.0 Genes and Genomics in 116-118 OA31 Anthelmintic Resistance in Parasite Control Ruminants 10-11 PL3.0 Leishmaniasis, Leishvet and 119-122 OA32 Avian Parasites One Health 122-125 OA33 Equine Cyathostomes I 12-13 PL4.0 Veterinary Entomology: 125-128 OA34 Flies and Fly Control in Outbreak and Advancements Ruminants 128-131 OA35 Ruminant Trematodes I Oral Sessions
  • Z:\My Documents\WPDOCS\IACUC

    Z:\My Documents\WPDOCS\IACUC

    ZOONOTIC DISEASES OF LABORATORY, AGRICULTURAL, AND WILDLIFE ANIMALS July, 2007 Michael S. Rand, DVM, DACLAM University Animal Care University of Arizona PO Box 245092 Tucson, AZ 85724-5092 (520) 626-6705 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.ahsc.arizona.edu/uac Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 3 Amebiasis ............................................................................................................................................... 5 B Virus .................................................................................................................................................... 6 Balantidiasis ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Brucellosis ........................................................................................................................................ 6 Campylobacteriosis ................................................................................................................................ 7 Capnocytophagosis ............................................................................................................................ 8 Cat Scratch Disease ............................................................................................................................... 9 Chlamydiosis .....................................................................................................................................
  • Biologic Effects of Fenbendazole in Rats and Mice: a Review

    Biologic Effects of Fenbendazole in Rats and Mice: a Review

    Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Vol 46, No 6 Copyright 2007 November 2007 by the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science Pages 8–15 Overview Biologic Effects of Fenbendazole in Rats and Mice: A Review David Villar, Carolyn Cray,* Julia Zaias, and Norman H Altman This review summarizes fi ndings from toxicologic, carcinogenic, immunologic, and metabolic studies on fenbendazole (FBZ). Currently, FBZ is used to treat or prevent pinworm outbreaks in laboratory rodents. Because antiparasitic treatments usually are not part of experimental designs, interactions from the medication on the outcomes of ongoing experiments are a concern. At therapeutic levels, FBZ does not alter the total content of cytochromes P450 but does induce certain hepatic cytochrome P450 isoforms, namely 1A1, 1A2, and 2B1. Although expressed constitutively at low or undetectable levels, these isoforms particularly are known for bioactivating a number of procarcinogens. Lifetime studies in rats have shown that FBZ is not a carcinogen but that it may behave as a tumor promoter when given after certain initiators. Unlike in other animal species, FBZ treatment-associated myelosuppression has not been reported to occur in rodents. The few currently available immunologic studies in mice, including an autoimmune model, have not shown effects on selected immune responses. How- ever, data from other animal species suggest that the ability of B and T lymphocytes to proliferate in the secondary immune response may be suppressed during treatment
  • Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 39/Thursday, February 27, 2014

    Federal Register/Vol. 79, No. 39/Thursday, February 27, 2014

    10976 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 39 / Thursday, February 27, 2014 / Rules and Regulations NADA/ANADA Ingredient new animal drugs 107–997 ............ Roxarsone/NICARB (nicarbazin)/LINCOMIX (lincomycin). 108–115 ............ Roxarsone/NICARB (nicarbazin). 120–724 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/STAFAC (virginiamycin)/COBAN (monensin). 138–953 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/STAFAC (virginiamycin)/BIO–COX (salinomycin). 141–058 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/AVIAX (semduramycin)/BMD (bacitracin MD). 141–066 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/AVIAX (semduramycin). 141–226 ............ Roxarsone/AVIAX (semduramycin)/STAFAC (virginiamycin). 200–170 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/NICARMIX 25 (nicarbazin)/LINCOMIX (lincomycin). 200–172 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/NICARMIX 25 (nicarbazin). • Elanco Animal Health, A Division that FDA withdraw approval of the of Eli Lilly & Co., Lilly Corporate Center, following four NADAs: Indianapolis, IN 46285 has requested NADA Ingredient new animal drugs 041–500 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/COBAN (monensin). 049–464 ............ Roxarsone/monensin/bacitracin. 140–445 ............ Roxarsone/MONTEBAN (narasin). 141–113 ............ 3–NITRO (roxarsone)/MAXIBAN (narasin and nicarbazin). • Cross Vetpharm Group Ltd., withdraw approval of the following Broomhill Road, Tallaght, Dublin 24, three NADAs: Ireland, has requested that FDA NADA Ingredient new animal drugs 038–241 ............ PRO–GEN (arsanilic acid)/ERYTHRO (erythromycin)/zoalene. 038–242 ............ PRO–GEN (arsanilic acid)/ERYTHRO
  • A Randomized, Controlled Field Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety Of

    A Randomized, Controlled Field Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety Of

    Karadzovska et al. Parasites & Vectors (2017) 10:528 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2469-x RESEARCH Open Access A randomized, controlled field study to assess the efficacy and safety of lotilaner flavored chewable tablets (Credelio™)in eliminating fleas in client-owned dogs in the USA Daniela Karadzovska1, Kimberly Chappell2, Shane Coble2, Martin Murphy3, Daniela Cavalleri3, Scott Wiseman4, Jason Drake2* and Steve Nanchen3 Spanish version: Please see Additional file 1 (https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-017-2469-x) for the Spanish version of this article and Additional file 2 for the French translation of the Abstract. Abstract Background: Preclinical studies have shown that the novel isoxazoline, lotilaner (Credelio™, Elanco) administered orally to dogs, produces rapid flea and tick knockdown and sustained speed of kill for at least a month post- treatment with a wide safety margin. A field study was undertaken to validate pre-clinical results. Methods: Dogs were enrolled at 10 veterinary clinics across the United States. Qualifying households containing up to three dogs and one primary dog with at least 10 fleas were randomized 2:1 to receive lotilaner (Credelio™,Elanco)at the recommended minimum dose of 20 mg/kg, or afoxolaner (Nexgard®, Merial), administered per label, to give a minimum dose of 2.5 mg/kg. Treatments were dispensed on Days 0, 30 and 60 for administration by owners; all household dogs received the same treatment as the primary dog. Post-enrollment flea and tick counts were made on primary dogs on Days 30, 60 and 90, and all dogs were assessed for tablet palatability and safety.
  • Frontline Tri-Act®) Against Haemaphysalis Longicornis Tick Infestation in Dogs Wilfried Lebon1* Julian Liebenberg2 Nadège Perier3 Doug Carithers4 Fréderic Beugnet3

    Frontline Tri-Act®) Against Haemaphysalis Longicornis Tick Infestation in Dogs Wilfried Lebon1* Julian Liebenberg2 Nadège Perier3 Doug Carithers4 Fréderic Beugnet3

    Efficacy of a Single Spot-on Administration of Fipronil and Permethrin (Frontline Tri-act®) Against Haemaphysalis longicornis Tick Infestation in Dogs Wilfried Lebon1* Julian Liebenberg2 Nadège Perier3 Doug Carithers4 Fréderic Beugnet3 1Boehringer Ingelheim, Saint-Vulbas, France 2Clinvet, Universitas, Bloemfontein, South Africa 3Boehringer Ingelheim, Lyon, France 4Boehringer Ingelheim, Animal Health USA Inc., Duluth, USA *E-mail: [email protected] KEY WORDS: Haemaphysalis longicornis, formed at 24 hours post-infestations on Days fipronil, permethrin, Frontline Tri-Act, dog, 8, 15, 22, and 29, and ticks were removed efficacy. and counted at 48 hours post-treatment (on Day 2) and after each tick infestation on ABSTRACT Days 9, 16, 23, and 30. Acaricidal efficacies A blinded controlled laboratory study was for 24h thumb-counts were 100%, 98.8%, conducted to assess the acaricidal efficacy of 91.7%, and 84.4% on Days 8, 15, 22, and the fipronil/permethrin spot-on formulation 29, respectively. Efficacies of 98.1%, 100%, (Frontline Tri-Act®, Boehringer Ingelheim) 100%, 98.1%, and 94.7% were determined against Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks. based on removal counts performed on Days Fourteen healthy dogs were included in this 2, 9, 16, 23, and 30, respectively. There were study. Dogs in Group 1 served as untreated significant differences of the number of live controls while dogs in Group 2 were treated with Frontline Tri-Act on Day 0 at the ticks between treated and control group at minimum recommended dose of 0.1 mL/ each time-point (p <0.005). A single topical kg, corresponding to 6.76 mg/kg fipronil, administration of the combination of fipronil and 50.48 mg/kg permethrin.
  • (Credelio™) Against Haemaphysalis Longicornis Infestations of Dogs

    (Credelio™) Against Haemaphysalis Longicornis Infestations of Dogs

    Otaki et al. Parasites & Vectors (2018) 11:448 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3032-0 RESEARCH Open Access Laboratory evaluation of the efficacy of lotilaner (Credelio™) against Haemaphysalis longicornis infestations of dogs Hiroshi Otaki1, Junko Sonobe1, Martin Murphy2, Daniela Cavalleri2, Wolfgang Seewald2, Jason Drake3* and Steve Nanchen2 Abstract Background: Throughout Japan, Korea and China, Haemaphysalis longicornis ticks are vectors of Babesia gibsoni, which causes severe and progressive anemia in dogs. This study evaluated the efficacy of a single administration of lotilaner flavored chewable tablets (CredelioTM) against experimental canine H. longicornis infestations. Methods: Twenty-two healthy Beagles were ranked in descending order of counts of H. longicornis completed 48 h after challenge on Day -7. The 16 dogs with the highest live tick counts were blocked into pairs and within pairs randomized to either lotilaner-treatment at a minimum dose rate of 20 mg/kg or sham-treated controls. Treatment was administered within 30 ± 5 min following feeding on Day 0. Infestations with 50 unfed adult H. longicornis were completed on Days -2, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35. Elizabethan collars were placed for 48 (± 2) h after each infestation and a T-shirt was placed on each dog to facilitate attachment. Ticks were counted in situ 12 and 24 h post-treatment and counted and removed after an additional 24 h (48 h after treatment) and 48 h after each post- treatment infestation. Dogs were sedated for tick challenges and counts. Live attached ticks on each dog were counted for efficacy assessments. Lotilaner was considered effective if the average tick attachment rate in the control group was at least 20%, if there was a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in mean tick counts between treated and control groups, and if the lotilaner-treated group had a calculated efficacy of at least 90%.
  • CAMELID MEDICINE CABINET Antibiotics

    CAMELID MEDICINE CABINET Antibiotics

    CAMELID MEDICINE CABINET Pamela G. Walker, DVM, MS, DACVIM-LA Camelid Care Veterinary Services The camelid population is continuing to grow in the United States with an increasing need for scientific information about proper dosage for medications in camelids. There is ongoing research in many institutions to try to find answers for these questions. The lack of complete information represents a challenge for veterinarians and camelid owners when determining a course of treatment for their camelid patients. As camelid owners it is important to work with your local veterinarian to plan treatment protocols for your llamas and alpacas. There are many factors to take into consideration when determining which drugs and what dosage to use in different situations. The information provided here is a basic guideline; specific treatments should be started only with the guidance of your veterinarian. Due to lack of complete information, the dosages used in camelids are frequently taken from dosages used in sheep, goats, cattle and horses. However, several differences have already been discovered, for example antibiotics, as a general rule, appear to have a longer time of action in camelids compared to domestic ruminants. There also seems to be a difference in dosing between llamas and alpacas. These differences can be dangerous and result in fatal over-dosages if the drug mechanism is not understood, for example Panacur and Valbazen doses. The choice of which drug to use in certain situations is a complicated decision and should not be decided upon in a “cookie cutter” manner. The age, sex, pregnancy status and general health of the alpaca/llama should be taken into consideration when deciding which drug to use.