Force for Change R2 Award List Final
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Appendix Eight
Stratford-on-Avon Site Allocations Plan (SAP): Sustainability Appraisal (SA) Appendix VIII: SA of Options for Reserve Housing Sites by Settlement Key: Categories of Significance Symbol Meaning Sustainability Effect ++ Major Positive Proposed development encouraged as would resolve existing sustainability problem + Minor Positive No sustainability constraints and proposed development acceptable 0 Neutral Neutral effect ? Uncertain Uncertain or Unknown Effects - Minor Negative Potential sustainability issues: mitigation and/or negotiation possible -- Major Negative Problematical and improbable because of known sustainability issues; mitigation likely to be difficult and/or expensive Alcester Settlement Baseline Overview relevant to SA objectives: SA Objective Settlement Assessment Heritage The historic market town of Alcester overlies the site of a significant Roman settlement on Icknield Street. The town was granted a Royal Charter to hold a weekly market in 1274 and prospered throughout the next centuries. In the 17th Century it became a centre of the needle industry. With its long narrow Burbage plots and tueries (interlinking passageways), the town centre street pattern of today and many of its buildings are medieval. There are a number of heritage assets which includes Scheduled Monuments, Listed Buildings, a Conservation Area and archaeological features within and adjacent to the urban area. The Conservation area’s character is defined by the medieval street pattern, the presence of a wide diversity of buildings with a range of distinguishing features, and the gaps between the buildings which create an intriguing spatial element. The majority of Alcester’s Listed Buildings are located within the Conservation Area, as are parts of the Alcester Roman Town Scheduled Monument.1 Landscape The Landscape Sensitivity Study identifies extensive areas of land adjacent to the town as being of high sensitivity to development. -
Public Transport Map Acocks Green R
WARWICKSHIRE CD INDEX TO PLACES SERVED WARWICKSHIRE BUS SERVICES IN WARWICKSHIRE A L Edingdale Public Transport Map Acocks Green R ............................... B3 Langley............................................. B4 Warwickshire Adderley Park R ............................... A3 Langley Green R .............................. A3 Public Transport Map SERVICE ROUTE DESCRIPTION OPERATOR DAYS OF NORMAL SERVICE ROUTE DESCRIPTION OPERATOR DAYS OF NORMAL 82 R NUMBER CODE OPERATION FREQUENCY NUMBER CODE OPERATION FREQUENCY 7 Alcester ............................................. A5 Lapworth ...................................... B4 June 2016 Clifton Campville Alderminster ...................................... C6 Lawford Heath ...................................D4 Measham Alexandra Hospital ............................. A4 Lea Hall R....................................... B3 March 2017 1/2 Nuneaton – Red Deeps – Attleborough SMR Mon-Sat 15 Minutes 115 Tamworth – Kingsbury – Hurley AMN Mon-Sat Hourly Elford Harlaston Allen End........................................... B2 Lea Marston ...................................... B2 PUBLIC TRANSPORT MAP 82 Allesley ............................................. C3 Leamington Hastings..........................D4 Newton Alvechurch R ................................... A4 Leamington Spa R............................ C4 1/2 P&R – Stratford – Lower Quinton – Chipping Campden – JH Mon-Sat Hourly 116 Tamworth – Kingsbury – Curdworth – Birmingham AMN Mon-Sat Hourly 7 Burgoland 224 Alvecote ........................................... -
Co Uncil L Ratfo Ord-O On-Av Von D Distr
Report to Stratford-on-Avon District Council by Pete Drew BSc (Hons), Dip TP (Dist) MRTPI an Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Date 20 June 2016 PLANNING AND COMPULSORY PURCHASE ACT 2004 (AS AMENDED) SECTION 20 REPORT ON THE EXAMINATION INTO THE STRATFORD-ON-AVON CORE STRATEGY Document submitted for examination on 30 September 2014 Hearings held between 6 and 29 January 2015 and 12 and 21 January 2016 Accompanied site inspections made on 2 and 3 February 2015 and 21 January 2016 File Ref: J3720/429/2 Contents Topic Page Table of abbreviations used in this report 3 Non-Technical Summary 4 Introduction and Background 5 Assessment of Duty to Co-operate 8 Assessment of Soundness 8 Main issues 8 Issue 1: Objectively Assessed Need 9 Issue 2: Sustainability Appraisal 27 Issue 3: Development strategy, including whether the 43 allocated housing sites are sound Issue 4: Economic development 83 Issue 5: Housing land supply 92 Issue 6: Affordable housing 118 Issue 7: Housing mix and type 123 Issue 8: Green Belt 129 Issue 9: Historic environment and design 131 Issue 10: Climate change and natural environment 133 Issue 11: Retail development 136 Issue 12: Miscellaneous policy issues: (i) special landscape areas; (ii) areas of restraint; (iii) the area strategies; (iv) accommodation for gypsies, travellers and travelling showpeople; (v) tourism and leisure development; (vi) healthy communities; (vii) transport and communications; (viii) developer contributions; and, (ix) the evening and night-time economy -
GLH Aspect of the Core Strategy, However, Scant Regard Has Be Paid to Either Legal Requirements Or Moral Strictures
Land at Gaydon/Lighthorne Heath Supplementary Planning Document Informal consultation on initial draft document February/March 2015 Page 1 Consultation Statement Council response to comments received Item 5 Stratford-on-Avon District Council Appendix 2 August 2015 1.0 - Introduction Consultee Comments Response Timothy Bull - Gaydon Even before I start to read SDC's "new" Core Strategy Comments noted. The SPD cannot be adopted Resident document I feel I must have recorded the fact that I am of ahead of the adoption of the Core Strategy, but given the opinion that both SDC and Bird group, with their separate the Council’s decisions on this matter it is considered (and now differing) proposals, are jumping the gun in inviting reasonable to prepare the document in parallel with residents to view their proposals informally. Surely in the the remaining stages of the Core Strategy process. spirit of the outlines set out by the inspector neither of the two proposals should have been published before his report is issued; throughout the entire process of the generation of the GLH aspect of the Core Strategy, however, scant regard has be paid to either legal requirements or moral strictures. It is also interesting to note that the two proposals have reduced the numbers of houses to be built from the initial 4,800 to 2,000, with an option for more, in Bird's case and 3,000 in SDC's. I can only assume that the rapidity of the appearance of both schemes is an attempt to circumvent any negativity in the Core Strategy, by the inference of an "all or nothing" Page 2 comment in the last paragraph of the email I received from David Nash. -
14-10-01 3-In-1 Starbold Wind Farm Stratford
Michelle Smith Our Ref: APP/J3720/A/13/2193579 Eversheds LLP Your Ref: 181122.000004 Bridgewater Place Water Lane LEEDS West Yorkshire LS11 5DR 1 October 2014 Dear Madam, TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT 1990 – SECTION 78 APPEAL BY BROADVIEW ENERGY LTD- THE ERECTION OF 4 No. WIND TURBINES. LAND BETWEEN BISHOPS ITCHINGTON, GAYDON AND KNIGHTCOTE TO THE SOUTH-EAST OF THE B4451 (APPLICATION REF: 12/00330/FUL) 1. I am directed by the Secretary of State to say that consideration has been given to the report of the Inspector, SRG Baird BA(Hons), MRTPI, who held an inquiry beginning on 10 September 2013 into your client’s appeal against the refusal of Stratford-On-Avon District Council (“the Council”) to grant planning permission for the erection of 4no. wind turbines up to a maximum tip height of 125m high, and other ancillary development including a new vehicular access off the Gaydon Road (B4551), access tracks, vehicular accesses, crane hard standing areas, a control building, underground cabling, construction compound and meteorological mast on land between Bishops Itchington, Gaydon and Knightcote to the south- east of the B4451. 2. On the 11th October 2013 the appeal was recovered for the Secretary of State's determination, in pursuance of section 79 of, and paragraph 3 of Schedule 6 to, the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 on the grounds that it involves a renewable energy development. Inspector’s recommendation and summary of the decision 3. The Inspector, whose report is enclosed with this letter, recommended that the appeal be dismissed and planning permission refused. -
Sustainer Winter 2017 Layout 1
THE SustainerJournal of The Royal Logistic Corps R WINTER 2017 THE Corps Motto: We Sustain Regimental March: On Parade by Albert Elms Sustainer Regimental Slow March: Lion, Sword and Crown by Craig Bywater formed in 1993 Volume 25 No 4 R Winter 2017 7 Defence Digest An update on matters affecting 12 soldiers and officers careers, fundraising for charity, cultural celebrations and training defect reports 8 Global advance A snapshot of The RLC across the world 12 Invictus Games 2017 RLC veterans come home with decorations 14 Taking pride in who we are RLC soldiers mark the the 50th 16 Anniversary of the start of the decriminalisation of homosexuality 16 3 Regiment Public Duties The time-honoured ceremony of the changing of the guard 20 Army Photographic Competition All the winners from the competition this year 22 Ex JOINT CATERER The annual flagship event for Armed Forces and MOD civilian caterers 23 The MGL’s Cabal Highlights from The RLC Conference 17 23 31 Soldier to Veteran One RLC soldier's story of transition 34 Unit Notes Updates on what's happening in regts and units across the Corps 70 Sports & Adventurous training News from across the Corps and the world, everything from trekking and rock climbing to football and rugby 22 www.royallogisticcorps.co.uk • Facebook: The Royal Logistic Corps • Twitter: @RHQ_The_RLC 1 EDITORS’ NOTE With the winter issue of The Sustainer, 2017 is drawing nearer To mark the occasion, two RLC soldiers look at their to a close, and what an interesting year it has been. experiences of serving as openly gay officers and why it is The year has seen plenty of achievements for The RLC and important to recognise individual diversity. -
(Public Pack)Agenda Document for the Cabinet, 28/09/2015 14:00
The Cabinet Notice of Meeting Monday 28 September 2015 2.00 p.m. The Council Chamber Elizabeth House Church Street Stratford-upon-Avon Members of The Cabinet are requested to attend Leader Councillor Christopher Saint Deputy Leader Councillor Stephen Thirlwell (Partnerships Portfolio) Councillor Mike Brain Technical Services Portfolio Councillor Stephen Gray Community Safety, Health & Well Being Portfolio Councillor Maurice Howse Enterprise, Housing and Revenues Portfolio Councillor Lynda Organ Finance and Physical Resources Portfolio Councillor Daren Pemberton Environmental Services Portfolio Observers: Councillor Mike Gittus Chairman of the Council Councillor Tony Jefferson OSC Chairman Councillor Peter Moorse Leader Liberal Democrat Group Paul Lankester Chief Executive Elizabeth House, Church Street Stratford-upon-Avon CV37 6HX For further information about this agenda Telephone 01789 267575 Contact: Caroline Nash Facsimile 01789 260007 Telephone: 01789 260245 Minicom 01789 260747 DX700737 STRATFORD-ON-AVON 2 e-mail: [email protected] website www.stratford.gov.uk THE CABINET PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT MEETINGS Members of the public are permitted to address The Cabinet if notice has been given in writing or by electronic mail to the Chief Executive no later than midday two clear (working) days before the day of the meeting. For example if the meeting is to be held on a Monday the deadline would be midday the Wednesday before. Each notice must give the name and address of the speaker. At any one meeting speakers may only address The Cabinet on matters contained within the Agenda. The speaker will be invited to address the meeting at the time the item they wish to make representations on is to be discussed, in accordance with the following procedure: a time allowance of three minutes for each member of the public to address The Cabinet be implemented; and if more than one person wishes to address the meeting on one particular subject, a maximum of 5 minutes would be allowed in total.