DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Networking Sites and Complex Technology Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Networking Sites and Complex Technology Assessment International Journal of E-Politics, 1(3), 19-38, July-September 2010 19 Social Networking Sites and Complex Technology Assessment Christian Fuchs, Unified Theory of Information Research Group (UTI), Austria ABSTRACT Social networking sites (SNS) are integrated world wide web-based information, communication and com- munity platforms that allow the creation of personal profiles, the upload and sharing of multimedia data, networking with other users with the help of “friends lists”, communication by tools such as e-mail, guest books, or forums. SNS combine a number of Internet technologies on one platform and are among the most popular Internet and web applications. Young people especially use them, which is why it is important to assess the implications of SNS usage by young people for society. In this paper, foundations of complex and dialectical SNS technology assessment are elaborated by introducing three different approaches of technol- ogy assessment: 1) technological determinism; 2) the social construction of technology; and 3) complex dialectical technology assessment. It is argued that technology assessment should be conceived as complex and dialectical and that it should try to identify contradictions of technology and society. An empirical study of SNS usage is presented as an example of complex, dialectical technology assessment. Keywords: Critical Information Systems Research, Critical Studies of Media and Information, Critical Theory, Dialectics, Social Networking Sites, Technology Assessment INTRODUCTION communication, and community platforms that allow the creation of personal profiles, Technology assessment employs social theory, the upload and sharing of multimedia data, social research, and ethics for assessing the im- networking with other users with the help of pacts that specific technologies have on society. “friends lists”, communication by tools such The purpose of this paper is to distinguish vari- as e-mail, guest books, or forums. SNS com- ous causal logics of technology assessment, to bine a number of Internet technologies on one introduce the approach of complex dialectical platform. In the list of the 100 most accessed technology assessment and to apply this ap- web platforms, one finds the following SNS: proach to the realm of social networking sites. Facebook (#2), Myspace (#12), VKontakte Social networking sites (SNS) are inte- (#35), LinkedIn (#37), Orkut (#49), hi5 (#52), grated world wide web-based information, Kaixin001 (#54), Orkut.com (#63), Orkut India (#74), LiveJournal (#80), Mixi (#86), Renren (#92), Odoklassniki (#95)1. These data DOI: 10.4018/jep.2010070102 . 20 International Journal of E-Politics, 1(3), 19-38, July-September 2010 show that SNS are among the most popular of users who will see their advertisements and web applications. It is therefore important to we may use any of the non-personally identifi- assess how the usage of SNS changes society. able attributes we have collected (including Technology assessment should be addressed information you may have decided not to show by SNS research. However, depending on to other users, such as your birth year or other which approach of technology assessment one sensitive personal information or preferences) chooses, there will be a different assessment. It to select the appropriate audience for those is therefore crucial to be aware of the different advertisements. For example, we might use forms of technology assessment when assessing your interest in soccer to show you ads for the impacts of SNS. The purpose of this paper soccer equipment, but we do not tell the soccer is to contribute to grounding foundations of equipment company who you are. (Facebook technology assessment in respect to SNS and Privacy Policy, version from December 9th, young people. 2009; accessed on December 16th, 2009). Most SNS are commercial and profit- oriented. For accumulating capital, they use This example shows that surveillance on targeted advertising. They sell the users, their SNS is a particularly important topic. I will usage behaviour, and information about their show in section 3, how users assess surveil- uploaded data as a commodity to advertising lance on SNS. clients that target users with individualized 2% of the US Facebook users are aged 3-12, advertising messages that reflect the users’ 20% 13-17, and 45% 18-34. 1% of MySpace behaviour and interests. Capital accumulation users are aged 3-12, 14% 13-17, and 58% 18- on SNS is based on permanent surveillance of 342. This means that 67% of the US Facebook personal data and personal user behaviour. SNS users and 73% of the MySpace users are less are not only capital accumulation machines, than 35 years old, although only 47.6% of but also surveillance machines (Fuchs, 2009b). the total US population can be found in the They are based on the principle of the prosumer/ same age range3. Young people are the main produsage commodity (Fuchs, 2008, 2009b, user group of SNS. It is therefore especially 2010a, 2010b, 2010c) – users generate, upload interesting to study their usage behaviour and and share content and personal information attitudes towards SNS as well as the implica- that is commodified by targeted advertising: tions for society. Young people are new media advertising clients pay for getting access to this “innovators” and “early adopters”, who are information in order to be enabled to target users “active information seekers about new ideas”, with personalized advertising. The users and have “a high degree of mass media exposure”, their data become commodified. For doing so, and are “the first to adopt a new idea” (Rogers, legal frameworks are needed that are formulated 1995, p. 22). Studying the use of new media by in the terms of use and privacy policies of SNS. young people can therefore give an early picture For example Facebook, the leading SNS, of potential larger future trends. guarantees the legal use of targeted advertis- The research presented in this paper is situ- ing on the site with the help of the following ated within the research field of young people passage in the privacy policy: new media studies. Loader (2007) argues that young people are not politically disaffected, 4. How We Use Your Information […] to serve but rather politically displaced by traditional personalized advertising to you. We don’t share forms of politics and traditional politicians. your information with advertisers without your “Parliamentary and congressional forums, vot- consent. (An example of consent would be if ing booths and the restrictions of social class- you asked us to provide your shipping address based party allegiance contrast strongly with the to an advertiser to receive a free sample.) We self-expression induced communication spaces allow advertisers to choose the characteristics of MySpace, MSN, Flickr and mobile texting International Journal of E-Politics, 1(3), 19-38, July-September 2010 21 as potential means to enable young people’s content, which in turn sell the collected data to political efficacy” (Loader, 2007, p. 2). But third parties. Sophisticated profiling software new media in contemporary society not only is employed frequently, tracking every move bear positive potentials for young people, they on-line not just on individual Web sites, but are also embedded into structures of domina- on every site visited” (Montgomery, 2000, p. tion. Montgomery (2000, p. 62) argues in this 65). The goal would be to foster “education, context that a dialectical approach is needed in community-building, civic participation, and young people media research that sees that and collaboration among youth” (Montgomery, how the digital media environment “holds both 2000, p. 66). This would require advancing promise and peril for youth”. non-commercial civic media. This can be seen Buckingham (2006) challenges Tapscott’s as an example of a critical approach to media (1998) techno-optimistic notion of the digital research on young people that criticizes tradi- generation (Tapscott speaks of the “N-Geners” tional approaches “for being instrumentalist and as all those born since 1977) that has been pro- for serving, often unwittingly, the interest of duced by the Internet. He classifies Tapscott’s dominant groups” (Cecez-Kecmanovic, 2005, approach as “a form of technological determin- p. 22). The traditional approaches to media ism” (Buckingham, 2006, p. 9) and argues that studies can be seen as “defending the status quo one must contextualize opportunities and risks and ultimately reinforcing power structures” of Internet usage by young people by taking into (Cecez-Kecmanovic, 2005, p. 22). The basic account political economy, everyday realities, assumption of the approach employed in this and socio-culture. Tapscott would not take into paper is that a critical theory and critical studies account “the possibility that technology might approach is needed for analyzing SNS usage be used to exploit young people economically by young people. […] or indeed that the market might not provide To develop a critical approach to the as- equally for all” (Buckingham, 2006, p. 10). sessment of the implications of SNS usage by In many publications about new media young people for society I first examine three use by young people, aspects of capitalism different logics of technology assessment, in and political economy as context variables are section 2. The approach of complex, dialecti- missing. So for example Sonia Livingstone cal technology assessment is introduced. This (2002) discusses lifestyle, leisure, the home, approach is applied to SNS (section 3). An the family, and literacy as context variables, empirical study of SNS usage is then presented but largely ignores capitalism as fundamental as an example of complex, dialectical technol- context variable of young people’s use of new ogy assessment. First in section 4, the empirical media. There is only a short mentioning of methodology is explained detailing a survey consumerism (Livingstone, 2002, pp. 111-113), about SNS usage by students. Most students fall but not a separate chapter about the critique of in the group that contains people that are aged the political economy of young people’s new 18-34 years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Social Media Tool Analysis
    Social Media Tool Analysis John Saxon TCO 691 10 JUNE 2013 1. Orkut Introduction Orkut is a social networking website that allows a user to maintain existing relationships, while also providing a platform to form new relationships. The site is open to anyone over the age of 13, with no obvious bent toward one group, but is primarily used in Brazil and India, and dominated by the 18-25 demographic. Users can set up a profile, add friends, post status updates, share pictures and video, and comment on their friend’s profiles in “scraps.” Seven Building Blocks • Identity – Users of Orkut start by establishing a user profile, which is used to identify themselves to other users. • Conversations – Orkut users can start conversations with each other in a number of way, including an integrated instant messaging functionality and through “scraps,” which allows users to post on each other’s “scrapbooks” – pages tied to the user profile. • Sharing – Users can share pictures, videos, and status updates with other users, who can share feedback through commenting and/or “liking” a user’s post. • Presence – Presence on Orkut is limited to time-stamping of posts, providing other users an idea of how frequently a user is posting. • Relationships – Orkut’s main emphasis is on relationships, allowing users to friend each other as well as providing a number of methods for communication between users. • Reputation – Reputation on Orkut is limited to tracking the number of friends a user has, providing other users an idea of how connected that user is. • Groups – Users of Orkut can form “communities” where they can discuss and comment on shared interests with other users.
    [Show full text]
  • Disruptive Technology Assessment Game 'DTAG' Handbook V0.1
    Disruptive Technology Assessment Game ‘DTAG’ Handbook V0.1 Executive Summary What is the DTAG? The Disruptive Technology Assessment Game (DTAG) is a table-top seminar wargame, used to assess potential future technologies and their impact on military operations and operating environment. How is it played? There are four distinct steps in executing a DTAG experiment. The first two are part of the planning process, prior to playing the game. Step 1: Identify Possible Future Technologies that are under development and are of interest to the military. Step 2 – Create Ideas of Systems (IoS) cards from the technologies identified. Specific technologies, or combinations of technologies are combined with equipment to create new systems that could be employed by the military or by an adversary. These are described on cards. Step 3 – Play the DTAG. Figure 1 summarizes the process. Red teams and Blue teams both plan courses of action in the context of a scenario & vignette. After the initial confrontation of plans, which establishes the baseline, the teams plan again with the addition of future technology from the IoS cards. The second confrontation highlights the effect that the technology has on the plans and the wargame outcome. Figure 1: The DTAG Process Step 4 – Assess the results of the wargame through questions and analysis of data captured. Who plays it? The DTAG unites Technology experts, Military and Analysts providing a broad perspective on the potential impacts of future technology on military operations. The approach allows for an element of unconstrained thinking and the wargame-like rounds encourage open communication opportunities. Why should a DTAG be played, and when? It is most useful when assessing technology that is a prototype or at early stage of development, or technology that is not in widespread use by the military.
    [Show full text]
  • Los Angeles Lawyer June 2010 June2010 Issuemaster.Qxp 5/13/10 12:26 PM Page 5
    June2010_IssueMaster.qxp 5/13/10 12:25 PM Page c1 2010 Lawyer-to-Lawyer Referral Guide June 2010 /$4 EARN MCLE CREDIT PLUS Protecting Divorce Web Site Look and Estate and Feel Planning page 40 page 34 Limitations of Privacy Rights page 12 Revoking Family Trusts page 16 The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act Strength of page 21 Character Los Angeles lawyers Michael D. Schwartz and Phillip R. Maltin explain the effective use of character evidence in civil trials page 26 June2010_IssueMaster.qxp 5/13/10 12:42 PM Page c2 Every Legal Issue. One Legal Source. June2010_IssueMaster.qxp 5/13/10 12:25 PM Page 1 Interim Dean Scott Howe and former Dean John Eastman at the Top 100 celebration. CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW PROUDLY ANNOUNCES OUR RANKING AMONG THE TOP 100 OF ONE UNIVERSITY DRIVE, ORANGE, CA 92866 www.chapman.edu/law June2010_IssueMaster.qxp 5/13/10 12:25 PM Page 2 0/&'*3. ."/:40-65*0/4 Foepstfe!Qspufdujpo Q -"8'*3.$-*&/54 Q"$$&445007&3130'&44*0/"- -*"#*-*5:1307*%&34 Q0/-*/&"11-*$"5*0/4'03 &"4:$0.1-&5*0/ &/%034&%130'&44*0/"--*"#*-*5:*/463"/$&#30,&3 Call 1-800-282-9786 today to speak to a specialist. 5 ' -*$&/4&$ 4"/%*&(003"/(&$06/5:-04"/(&-&44"/'3"/$*4$0 888")&3/*/463"/$&$0. June2010_IssueMaster.qxp 5/13/10 12:26 PM Page 3 FEATURES 26 Strength of Character BY MICHAEL D. SCHWARTZ AND PHILLIP R. MALTIN Stringent rules for the admission of character evidence in civil trials are designed to prevent jurors from deciding a case on the basis of which party is more likeable 34 Parting of the Ways BY HOWARD S.
    [Show full text]
  • Seamless Interoperability and Data Portability in the Social Web for Facilitating an Open and Heterogeneous Online Social Network Federation
    Seamless Interoperability and Data Portability in the Social Web for Facilitating an Open and Heterogeneous Online Social Network Federation vorgelegt von Dipl.-Inform. Sebastian Jürg Göndör geb. in Duisburg von der Fakultät IV – Elektrotechnik und Informatik der Technischen Universität Berlin zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doktor der Ingenieurwissenschaften - Dr.-Ing. - genehmigte Dissertation Promotionsausschuss: Vorsitzender: Prof. Dr. Thomas Magedanz Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Axel Küpper Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ulrik Schroeder Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Maurizio Marchese Tag der wissenschaftlichen Aussprache: 6. Juni 2018 Berlin 2018 iii A Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web Authored by Joseph Smarr, Marc Canter, Robert Scoble, and Michael Arrington1 September 4, 2007 Preamble: There are already many who support the ideas laid out in this Bill of Rights, but we are actively seeking to grow the roster of those publicly backing the principles and approaches it outlines. That said, this Bill of Rights is not a document “carved in stone” (or written on paper). It is a blog post, and it is intended to spur conversation and debate, which will naturally lead to tweaks of the language. So, let’s get the dialogue going and get as many of the major stakeholders on board as we can! A Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web We publicly assert that all users of the social web are entitled to certain fundamental rights, specifically: Ownership of their own personal information, including: • their own profile data • the list of people they are connected to • the activity stream of content they create; • Control of whether and how such personal information is shared with others; and • Freedom to grant persistent access to their personal information to trusted external sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Gao-20-246G, Technology Assessment Design Handbook
    HANDBOOK Technology Assessment Design Handbook Handbook for Key Steps and Considerations in the Design of Technology Assessments GAO-20-246G December 2019 Contents Preface 1 Chapter 1 The Importance of Technology Assessment Design 6 1.1 Reasons to Conduct and Uses of a Technology Assessment 6 1.2 Importance of Spending Time on Design 8 Chapter 2 Technology Assessment Scope and Design 8 2.1 Sound Technology Assessment Design 9 2.2 Phases and Considerations for Technology Assessment Design 9 2.2.1 GAO Technology Assessment Design Examples 14 Chapter 3 Approaches to Selected Technology Assessment Design and Implementation Challenges 18 3.1 Ensuring Technology Assessment Products are Useful for Congress and Others 19 3.2 Determining Policy Goals and Measuring Impact 20 3.3 Researching and Communicating Complicated Issues 20 3.4 Engaging All Relevant Stakeholders 21 Appendix I Objectives, Scope, and Methodology 22 Appendix II Summary of Steps for GAO’s General Engagement Process 35 Appendix III Example Methods for Technology Assessment 38 Appendix IV GAO Contact and Staff Acknowledgments 44 Page i GAO-20-246G Technology Assessment Handbook Tables Table 1: Summary of GAO’s Technology Assessment Process 3 Table 2: Examples for Technology Assessment Objectives that Describe Status and Challenges to Development of a Technology 15 Table 3: Examples for Technology Assessment Objectives that Assess Opportunities and Challenges that May Result from the Use of a Technology 16 Table 4: Examples for Technology Assessment Objectives that Assess Cost-Effectiveness,
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds an End to Antisemitism!
    Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds An End to Antisemitism! Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman Volume 5 Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds Edited by Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, and Lawrence H. Schiffman ISBN 978-3-11-058243-7 e-ISBN (PDF) 978-3-11-067196-4 e-ISBN (EPUB) 978-3-11-067203-9 DOI https://10.1515/9783110671964 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. For details go to https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Library of Congress Control Number: 2021931477 Bibliographic information published by the Deutsche Nationalbibliothek The Deutsche Nationalbibliothek lists this publication in the Deutsche Nationalbibliografie; detailed bibliographic data are available on the Internet at http://dnb.dnb.de. © 2021 Armin Lange, Kerstin Mayerhofer, Dina Porat, Lawrence H. Schiffman, published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston The book is published with open access at www.degruyter.com Cover image: Illustration by Tayler Culligan (https://dribbble.com/taylerculligan). With friendly permission of Chicago Booth Review. Printing and binding: CPI books GmbH, Leck www.degruyter.com TableofContents Preface and Acknowledgements IX LisaJacobs, Armin Lange, and Kerstin Mayerhofer Confronting Antisemitism in Modern Media, the Legal and Political Worlds: Introduction 1 Confronting Antisemitism through Critical Reflection/Approaches
    [Show full text]
  • Dissertation Online Consumer Engagement
    DISSERTATION ONLINE CONSUMER ENGAGEMENT: UNDERSTANDING THE ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES Submitted by Amy Renee Reitz Department of Journalism and Technical Communication In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2012 Doctoral Committee: Advisor: Jamie Switzer Co-Advisor: Ruoh-Nan Yan Jennifer Ogle Donna Rouner Peter Seel Copyright by Amy Renee Reitz 2012 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT ONLINE CONSUMER ENGAGEMENT: UNDERSTANDING THE ANTECEDENTS AND OUTCOMES Given the adoption rates of social media and specifically social networking sites among consumers and companies alike, practitioners and academics need to understand the role of social media within a company’s marketing efforts. Specifically, understanding the consumer behavior process of how consumers perceive features on a company’s social media page and how these features may lead to loyalty and ultimately consumers’ repurchase intentions is critical to justify marketing efforts to upper management. This study focused on this process by situating online consumer engagement between consumers’ perceptions about features on a company’s social media page and loyalty and (re)purchase intent. Because online consumer engagement is an emerging construct within the marketing literature, the purpose of this study was not only to test the framework of online consumer engagement but also to explore the concept of online consumer engagement within a marketing context. The study refined the definition of online
    [Show full text]
  • Magazine of the Max Planck Phd
    m et agazine of the max planck phd n Publisher: Max Planck PhDnet (2008) Editorial board: Verena Conrad, MPI for Biological Cybermetics, Tübingen Corinna Handschuh, MPI for Evolutionary Anthroplology, Leipzig Julia Steinbach, MPI for Biogeochemistry, Jena Peter Buschkamp, MPI for Extraterrestrial Physics, Garching Franziska Hartung, MPI for Experimental Biology, Göttingen Design: offspring Silvana Schott, MPI for Biogeochemistry, Jena Table of Contents Dear reader, you have the third issue of the Offspring So, here you see the first issue of this new Dear Reader 3 in your hands, the official magazine of Offspring and we hope you enjoy reading the Max Planck PhDnet. This magazine it! The main topic of this issue is “Success”, A look back ... 4 was started in 2005 to communicate the for instance you may read interviews with ... and forward 5 network‘s activities and to provide rele- MPI-scientists at different levels of their Introduction of the new Steering Group 6 vant information to PhD students at all career, giving their personal perception of institutes. Therefore, the first issues mainly scientific success, telling how they celeb- Success story 8 contained reports about previous meetings rate success and how they cope with fai- Questionnaire on Scientific Success 10 and announcements of future events. lure; you will learn how two foreign PhD What the ?&%@# is Bologna? 14 students succeeded in getting along in However, at the PhD representatives’ mee- Germany in their first months – and of ting in Leipzig, November 2006, a new Workgroups of the PhDnet 15 course about the successful work of the work group was formed as the editorial PhDnet Meeting 2007 16 PhDnet during the last year.
    [Show full text]
  • A Systematic Review of Methods for Health Care Technology Horizon Scanning
    AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System A Systematic Review of Methods for Health Care Technology Horizon Scanning Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 Contract No. 290-2010-00006-C Prepared by: Fang Sun, M.D., Ph.D. Karen Schoelles, M.D., S.M., F.A.C.P ECRI Institute 5200 Butler Pike Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 AHRQ Publication No. 13-EHC104-EF August 2013 This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Health Care Horizon Scanning System by ECRI Institute under contract to AHRQ, Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2010-00006-C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to identify resources and methods for improving the AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System in the future. The purpose of the AHRQ Health Care Horizon Scanning System is to assist funders of research in making well-informed decisions in designing and funding comparative-effectiveness research. This report may periodically be assessed for the urgency to update. If an assessment is done, the resulting surveillance report describing the methodology and findings will be found on the Effective Health Care Program website at: www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in Healthtech What Do the Present and Future Hold? Foreword
    www.pwc.com/sg Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in HealthTech What do the present and future hold? Foreword A collaborative, data-driven and evidence based study The last few years have seen an explosion of technology along with an increasing convergence of the Healthcare, Medical Devices, HealthTech, Pharma and Digital realms. It is imperative that in the midst of this, we keep the patients and their problems at the heart of it all. To effectively do so, understanding continuously evolving patient needs will be critical. And by doing so, we can better solve the real challenges they face and provide solutions to complement current clinical practices and technologies to improve what we at PwC call the 3 As in healthcare: Affordable, Accessible and A+ quality care. However, with the rapid and exponential pace of technological advancement, how do we keep track of the game-changing and clinically impactful developments? What are the present trends driving these developments, and what are likely future trends? Is there a fit-for- purpose framework that can be applied to assist in the assessment of these technologies? What will be the implications to regulators, health technology assessments (HTA), policy makers, payers, healthcare professionals and any and all other stakeholders? Horizon Scanning for New and Emerging Technologies in HealthTech aims to answer these questions. For the purposes of this paper, MedTech refers to the traditional innovation-led, fully integrated medical device industry. HealthTech on the other hand, refers to information technology (IT)-led solutions which are more patient-focused and comprise start-ups and non-traditional players who are causing an industry paradigm shift.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Media Use in Higher Education: a Review
    education sciences Review Social Media Use in Higher Education: A Review Georgios Zachos *, Efrosyni-Alkisti Paraskevopoulou-Kollia and Ioannis Anagnostopoulos Department of Computer Science and Biomedical Informatics, School of Sciences, University of Thessaly, 35131 Lamia, Greece; [email protected] (E.-A.P.-K.); [email protected] (I.A.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-223-102-8628 Received: 14 August 2018; Accepted: 1 November 2018; Published: 5 November 2018 Abstract: Nowadays, social networks incessantly influence the lives of young people. Apart from entertainment and informational purposes, social networks have penetrated many fields of educational practices and processes. This review tries to highlight the use of social networks in higher education, as well as points out some factors involved. Moreover, through a literature review of related articles, we aim at providing insights into social network influences with regard to (a) the learning processes (support, educational processes, communication and collaboration enhancement, academic performance) from the side of students and educators; (b) the users’ personality profile and learning style; (c) the social networks as online learning platforms (LMS—learning management system); and (d) their use in higher education. The conclusions reveal positive impacts in all of the above dimensions, thus indicating that the wider future use of online social networks (OSNs) in higher education is quite promising. However, teachers and higher education institutions have not yet been highly activated towards faster online social networks’ (OSN) exploitation in their activities. Keywords: social media; social networks; higher education 1. Introduction Within the last decade, online social networks (OSN) and their applications have penetrated our daily life.
    [Show full text]
  • Ca. 156.04 KB
    1.3 billion hits on social media portals in the first quarter of 2010 - Figures rounded, multiple choice answers - Number of people who visited the site … at least once Number of hits *.facebook.com 15 million *.facebook.com 330 million *.stayfriends.de 14 million *.stayfriends.de 107 million *.wer-kennt-wen.de 11 million … visited *.wer-kennt-wen.de 338 million *.meinvz.net 6 million these site(s) … *.meinvz.net 195 million *.myspace.com 6 million *.myspace.com 33 million *.schuelervz.net 6 million *.schuelervz.net 118 million *.studivz.net 5 million *.studivz.net 123 million *.twitter.com 5 million *.twitter.com 20 million *.xing.com 4 million *.xing.com 25 million Total 1.3 billion hits Basis: 44 million people who went online in their leisure time at least once in the past 3 months (AGOF, GfK calculations) Source: GfK Panel Services (GfK Media Efficiency Panel), April 2010, German households with private Internet connection (n=15,000) www.gfk-compact.com Explosive growth on previous year’s period Number of people who visited the site ... at least once - Figures in %, multiple choice answers - *.facebook.com 35 32 *.stayfriends.de *.wer-kennt-wen.de 25 26 *.meinvz.net 19 *.myspace.com 13 14 14 *.schuelervz.net 12 13 11 12 12 10 9 9 *.studivz.net 7 *.twitter.com 3 *.xing.com Q1/2009 Q1/2010 Basis: 44 million people who went online in their leisure time at least once in the past 3 months (AGOF, GfK calculations) Source: GfK Panel Services (GfK Media Efficiency Panel), April 2010, German households with private Internet connection (n=15,000) www.gfk-compact.com Intensive cross-over use by social communities Cross-usage - Figures in %, multiple choice answers – … % of people who visited … also visited … Key to table (example): 47% of Facebook users also visited “Stayfriends” in the first quarter of 2010; 50% of “Stayfriends” subscribers also visited Facebook facebook.
    [Show full text]