Changes in Summer Abundance and Distribution of Mute Swans Along the Lower Great Lakes of Ontario, 1986 – 2011

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changes in Summer Abundance and Distribution of Mute Swans Along the Lower Great Lakes of Ontario, 1986 – 2011 Changes in Summer Abundance and Distribution of Mute Swans along the Lower Great Lakes of Ontario, 1986 – 2011 Mute Swan Photo: Homer Caliwag Shawn W. Meyer, Shannon S. Badzinski, Michael L. Schummer and Christopher M. Sharp Introduction The MuTe Swan ( Cygnus olor ) is one of populaTions along The mid-ATlanTic coasT Three swan species ThaT occur in NorTh of The U.S., porTions of The Pacific coasT America, buT is The only swan ThaT is and The GreaT Lakes region (Ciaranca et noT naTive To The conTinenT. Near The al . 1997). Breeding populaTions became beginning of The 20Th cenTury, MuTe esTablished wiThin coasTal and inland Swans were TransporTed inTo NorTh marshes in porTions of The GreaT Lakes America from Europe and Asia where region of The U.S. and Canada during They were released inTenTionally or es - The laTe 1950s Through The 1970s (PeTrie caped from capTive or semi-capTive col - and Francis 2003). In OnTario, The firsT lecTions leading To esTablishmenT of feral MuTe Swan nesT was documenTed in The 48 Ontario Birds April 2012 souThwesTern parT of The province in laTion of MuTe Swans is a conservaTion 1958 and swans were firsT observed on concern in The LGL region and else - The lower GreaT Lakes (LGL) (Lakes On - where in NorTh America. Tario, Erie, ST. Clair and Their connecTing DespiTe being an invasive, non-na - rivers) during The 1960s (Peck 1966, Tive species, MuTe Swans are proTecTed KnapTon 1993). Since ThaT Time, Their currenTly under The Migratory Birds Con - abundance and disTribuTion has in - vention Act, 1994 in Canada. MuTe creased subsTanTially in OnTario, parTic - Swans and oTher non-naTive species, ularly along The shorelines, marshes and however, are noT federally proTecTed in rivers associaTed wiTh lakes ST. Clair, Erie The U.S. since enacTmenT of The Migra - and OnTario (PeTrie and Francis 2003, tory Bird Treaty Reform Act in 2004 Badzinski 2007). (UniTed STaTes Fish and Wildlife Service The LGL are an imporTanT spring 2005). PeTrie and Francis (2003) and and auTumn sTaging area, providing feed - Bailey et al . (2008) suggesTed removing ing and resTing habiTaT for millions of MuTe Swans from The lisT of federally waTerfowl and oTher waTerbirds (Dennis proTecTed species in Canada To faciliTaTe et al. 1984, Schummer and PeTrie 2011). conTrol before populaTions aTTained lev - SubsTanTial and increasing numbers of els ThaT could affecT healTh and funcTion MuTe Swans have The poTenTial To affecT of The LGL coasTal marsh ecosysTem, waTerfowl (and oTher weTland-depen - componenTs which are criTical To sus - denT and aquaTic organisms) and Their Taining populaTions of naTive fish and habiTaT in The LGL region in a varieTy wildlife. Canada is currenTly reviewing of ways (PeTrie and Francis 2003). As The federal proTecTion sTaTus of MuTe one of The larger-bodied waTerfowl nesT - Swans. In The meanTime, accuraTely ing in NorTh America, MuTe Swans ag - moniToring abundance and disTribuTion gressively defend nesT siTes, broods and of These swans over Time is criTical in foraging areas. Thus, They compeTe wiTh The developmenT of managemenT sTraTe - oTher wildlife for criTical habiTaT re - gies for MuTe Swans and The habiTaTs sources and can cause physical harm To They negaTively affecT in OnTario and humans (Ciaranca et al. 1997, Therres ThroughouT Canada. and Brinker 2004). MuTe Swans also The populaTion and range expansion consume and uprooT subsTanTial quan - of MuTe Swans in The LGL region and TiTies of aquaTic vegeTaTion during for - ThroughouT OnTario has been well doc - aging which can reduce availabiliTy of umenTed using daTa from several differ - food To naTive herbivores and alTer abun - enT long-Term, mulTi-species surveys. dance and composiTion of aquaTic planTs PeTrie and Francis (2003) used daTa in aquaTic ecosysTems (Cobb and Harlan collecTed beTween 1980 and 2000 from 1980, Allin and Husband 2003, TaTu The Breeding Bird Survey (BBS), ChrisT - et al. 2007). Thus, an increasing popu - mas Bird CounT (CBC), The MidwinTer Volume 30 Number 1 49 Figure 1. The lower Great Lakes shoreline, marsh complexes, rivers, and inland lakes surveyed during the Mid-Summer Mute Swan Survey in Ontario. The red line indicates the aircraft flight path recorded by an onboard Global Positioning System (GPS) during the 2011 survey. Produced by CWS –ON under licence with OMNR. Queen’s Printer (c) 2011 WaTerfowl Survey (MWS) and 197 1– OnTario from The 1980s Through 2000s 2000 aerial surveys of migranT waTer - (Badzinski 2007). None of The above- fowl aT Long PoinT – Lake Erie, OnTario, menTioned surveys, however, were de - To documenT a rapid increase in MuTe signed specifically To moniTor The MuTe Swan abundance in The LGL region. IT Swan populaTion in The province. was esTimaTed ThaT The populaTion of The Mid-Summer MuTe Swan MuTe Swans on The LGL increased by Survey (MSMSS) is a broad scale, coor - 10% To 18% per year beTween 1980 dinaTed, inTernaTional moniToring ini - and 2000 and iT was predicTed ThaT iT TiaTive conducTed ThroughouT sTaTes and could double by 2010 (PeTrie and Fran - provinces in The ATlanTic Flyway aT cis 2003). The firsT and second Breed - Three-year inTervals since 1986 To deTer - ing Bird ATlases of OnTario showed ThaT mine abundance, producTiviTy and dis - MuTe Swans became more common TribuTion of MuTe Swans in various and widely disTribuTed along The LGL jurisdicTions and regions. DaTa collecTed coasTline, parTicularly around Lake On - during The survey are used To Track and Tario and aT inland locaTions in souThern mon iTor populaTio n size and, in some 50 Ontario Birds April 2012 sTaTes, To seT and evaluaTe populaTion ST. Lawrence River, Lake OnTario (in - managemenT goals for MuTe Swans. In cluding EasT Lake, WesT Lake and Lake OnTario, The survey TradiTionally has cov - Consecon), Niagara River, Lake Erie, De - ered The norThern shoreline of The ST. TroiT River, and Lake ST. Clair, as well as Lawrence River and The LGL, including over associaTed or nearby marsh com - The associaTed coasTal marsh complexes. plexes (Figure 1). During 2011, The sur - This survey provides The mosT currenT vey area was expanded inland To include and deTailed informaTion on abundance Rice Lake, Odessa Lake, and The Rideau and disTribuTion of MuTe Swans in The Canal sysTem beTween KingsTon and OTT - province. The purpose of This paper is awa. The survey is conducTed from a To describe changes in MuTe Swan abun - fixed-winged aircrafT flying aT an alTiTude dance beTween 1986 and 2011 and dis - of ~100 m, aT a speed of ~150 kph and TribuTion beTween 2002 and 2011 in The 250 m off of The shoreline. Survey rouTes LGL region of OnTario. over large weTland complexes and inland lakes are flown To maximize coverage of Methods suiTable habiTaT where swans may occur. The MSMSS is an inTernaTionally coor - The shoreline and inland survey area is dinaTed aerial survey ThaT is conducTed divided inTo secTors, which are smaller aT Three year inTervals beTween 1 and 30 geographic uniTs based on landscape fea - AugusT in norTheasTern NorTh America. Tures and readily idenTifiable landmarks In OnTario, This survey has been flown, ThaT enable deTerminaTion of abundance TradiTionally, along The shorelines of The and disTribuTion of swans aT finer scales. Figure 2. Number of Mute Swans observed along the lower Great Lakes of Ontario during the Mid-Summer Mute Swan Survey 1986 – 2011. Trend line indicates 2-yr moving average. 3,500 3,000 3,000 • • 2,500 2,500 • 2,000 2,000 1,500 1,500 e c n • 1a ,000 d • n 1,000 • u b 5A 00 • 500 • 0 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Year Volume 30 Number 1 51 Two observers, one on each side of The and 2011 showed an increase from 85 aircrafT, use a Tape or digiTal voice To 126 broods, represenTing abouT an recorder To record abundance of adulTs 8.0% per year increase (Table 1). (including sub-adulTs), cygneTs and The local abundance of MuTe Swans broods/family groups, as well as associ - changed aT several areas wiThin The Tradi - aTed informaTion on daTe, Time, general Tional LGL survey area beTween 2002 locaTion ( e.g. , name of lake, river, bay), and 2011 (Figure 3). On Lake OnTario, survey segmenT, general habiTaT Type ( e.g. , The greaTesT raTes of increase occurred aT lake, impoundmenT, river, marsh), devel - The easT end in The viciniTy of Prince Ed - opmenT zo ne (as of 2008: urban, sub ur - ward CounTy (including EasT Lake, WesT ban, rural), and laTiTude / longiTude (as Lake, Bay of QuinTe, and KingsTon area), of 2011). DaTa are Transcribed following whereas decreases occurred in cenTral surveys, enTered inTo a sTandard elec - Lake OnTario jusT wesT of Prince Edward Tronic daTabase and archived on a cen - CounTy and aT HamilTon Harbour (Fig - Tralized server wiTh EnvironmenT Canada. ure 3a). The greaTesT raTe of increase was ArcGIS was used To creaTe maps showing approximaTely 170% per year aT WesT Temporal and spaTial paTTerns in abun - Lake – Prince Edward CounTy, whereas dance and disTribuTion of MuTe Swans The greaTesT decrease was approximaTely in The LGL region of OnTario. 18% per year along The shoreline be - Tween Presqu’ile Bay and Bowmanville. Results BeTween 1986 and 2011, eighT MuTe Table 2. Abundance and average percent change per year the Midwinter Survey - Lower Great Lakes (MWS-LGL) and Swan surveys were conducTed on The LGL. Over This Timeframe, The ToTal 1986 1989 1993 1996 abundance of MuTe Swans increased from 615 To 3,062 in The TradiTional LGL Survey survey area in OnTario; This represenTs MSMSS 1 an average increase of 15.9% per year Ontario ( (Table 1). Since 2005, The MuTe Swan 615 811 1,100 1,200 - 2 - - 3 populaTion in The LGL has increased aT a slower raTe (approximaTely 1.0% per year) (Figure 2 and Table 2).
Recommended publications
  • Captive Wild Animal Farm License Application
    Mail to: Department of Natural Resources Captive Wild Animal Farm Captive Wildlife - CS/1 License Application PO Box 7924 Madison, WI 53707-7924 dnr.wi.gov Consult the attached instructions before completing Notice: Pursuant to ch. 169, Wis. Stats., and ch. NR 16, Wis. Adm. Code, Fees: completion of this form is required to apply for a captive wild animal farm license. Class A Captive Wild Animal Farm Operation of a captive wild animal farm without a license may result in forfeitures (Annual sales of $10,000 or more) of up to $500 in addition to suspension of eligibility for future licenses. A social $200 Initial license $100 Annual renewal security number or federal employer identification number is REQUIRED when applying for licenses according to ss. 169.34 and 169.35, Wis. Stats., but it may Class B Captive Wild Animal Farm not be disclosed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) to anyone (Annual sales less than $10,000) except the Departments of Children and Families, Workforce Development or the $50 Initial license $ 25 Annual renewal Department of Revenue. Personal information collected may be used for participation in surveys, eligibility for approvals, law enforcement and other $ 0 Sport Club or 4-H member under age 14. secondary purposes and may be provided to requesters to the extent required by Attach proof of current membership Wisconsin's Open Records laws (ss. 19.31-19.39, Wis. Stats.). + $20 Late fee if application filed after license expiration date. A. Applicant Information Last Name First MI DNR Customer ID Current License # (if renewal) Address Date of Birth (mm/dd/yyyy) SSN OR FEIN City State ZIP Code Daytime Phone (incl.
    [Show full text]
  • Free Download! the Trumpeter Swan
    G3647 The Trumpeter Swan by Sumner Matteson, Scott Craven and Donna Compton Snow-white Trumpeter Swans present a truly spectac- Swans of the Midwest ular sight. With a wingspan of more than 7 feet and a rumpeter Swans, along with ducks and geese, belong height of about 4 feet, the Trumpeter Swan (Cygnus buc- to the avian Order Anseriformes, Family Anatidae. cinator) ranks as the largest native waterfowl species in T Trumpeters have broad, flat bills with fine tooth-like North America. serrations along the edges which allow them to strain Because the Trumpeter Swan disappeared as a breed- aquatic plants and water. The birds’ long necks and ing bird in the Midwest, several states have launched strong feet allow them to uproot plants in water up to 4 restoration programs to reintroduce it to the region. This feet deep. publication will provide you with background informa- Most Trumpeter Swans weigh 21–30 pounds, tion on the Trumpeter Swan’s status and life history, and although some males exceed the average weight. The on restoration efforts being conducted in the upper male is called a cob; the female is called a pen; and a swan Midwest. in its first year is called a cygnet or juve- nile. The Trumpeter is often con- fused with the far more common Tundra Swan (formerly Whistling Swan, Cygnus columbianus), the only other native swan found routinely in North America. Tundra Swans can be seen in the upper Trumpeter Swan Midwest only during spring and fall migration. You can distinguish between the two native species most accurately by listening to their calls.
    [Show full text]
  • Mute Swans Make Noise: Lower Great Lakes Population Scrutinized
    Mute Swans Make Noise: Lower Great Lakes Population Scrutinized Scott A. Petrie* Introduction and 10 to15 percent per year. At this growth Population Status rate, the southern Ontario population Mute Swans (Cygnus olor), endemic to will double every seven to eight years. Eurasia, were introduced to North Also, given that the lower Great Lakes American city parks, zoos, avicultural includes about 116,000 acres of coastal collections, and estates in the late 1800s wetland habitat, the population could and early 1900s. The intentional releas- potentially reach 30,000 swans. If Mute es and accidental escape of these birds Swans populations increase to the point and their progeny resulted in a rapidly that they begin nesting on inland wet- expanding free-flying feral population lands and man-made waterbodies, as along the northeastern Atlantic Coast of they have in Poland and along the the United States, portions of the Pacific Atlantic Coast of the United States, we Coast, and more recently, much of the could expect that the southern Ontario southern half of the Great Lakes basin. population could even surpass 30,000 It is well known that exotic waterfowl birds. can have negative ecological impacts on The rapid growth rate of southern native species, particularly if the intro- Ontario’s feral Mute Swans can probably duced species is aggressive, competes be attributed to a number of factors. with other waterfowl for food or habi- The lower Great Lakes is climatically tat, and/or hybridizes with native similar to the native Eurasian range of species. Although hybridization is not Mute Swans.
    [Show full text]
  • Mute Swan (Cygnus Olor) ERSS
    Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, November 2018, March 2019 Web Version, 8/16/2019 Photo: Nolasco Diaz. Licensed under CC BY-SA. Available: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cisne_por_la_noche.jpg. (11/28/2018). 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range According to GISD (2018), Cygnus olor is native to Australia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Europe, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Korea, Democratic People's Republic Of Korea, Republic Of Latvia, Lithuania, Republic Of Moldova, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia And Montenegro, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. 1 From BirdLife International (2018): “NATIVE Extant (breeding) Kazakhstan; Mongolia; Russian Federation (Eastern Asian Russia); Turkmenistan Extant (non-breeding) Afghanistan; Armenia; Cyprus; Iran, Islamic Republic of; Iraq; Korea, Republic of; Kyrgyzstan; Spain Extant (passage) Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Extant (resident) Albania; Austria; Azerbaijan; Belarus; Belgium; Croatia; Czech Republic; Greece; Hungary; Ireland; Italy; Liechtenstein; Luxembourg; Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of; Montenegro; Netherlands; Russian Federation; Serbia; Slovenia; Switzerland; Turkey; United Kingdom Extant Bosnia and Herzegovina; Bulgaria; China; Denmark; Estonia; Finland;
    [Show full text]
  • Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination (IDDE) Guidance Manual
    References References American Public Works Association (APWA). 2001. Designing and Implementing an Effective Storm Water Management Program: Storm Water NPDES Phase II Regulations. Kansas City, MO. Andrews, E. 1997. Home*A*Syst An Environmental Risk-Assessment Guide for the Home. Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service, Regents of the University of Wisconsin. Brown, Ellen K. 1995. Investigation and Rehabilitation of Sewer Systems (Fact Sheet). Presented at: Navy Pollution Prevention Conference. June 6, 1995. Available online: http://es.epa.gov/program/p2dept/defense/navy/navysewr.html. Accesssed 2004. Burton, Jr., G.A. and R. Pitt. 2002. Stormwater Effects Handbook: A Tool Box for Watershed Managers, Scientists and Engineers. CRC/Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, 924 pp. Center for Watershed Protection. 2002. Unpublished Task I Technical Memorandum: Phase I Community Surveys in Support of Illicit Discharge Detection and Elimination Guidance Manual. IDDE project support material. Center for Watershed Protection. 1998. Rapid Watershed Planning Handbook: A Comprehensive Guide for Managing Urbanizing Watersheds. Center for Watershed Protection. Ellicott City, MD. Cherne Industries. Website. http://www.cherneind.com. Accessed 2003. City of Denver. Website. http://www.denvergov.org/recycle/hhw_collection.asp. Accessed 2004. City of Fort Worth Department of Environmental Management. 1993. Stream Sentinel Operational Guide. Fort Worth, TX. Duke, L.R. 1997. Evaluation of Non-Storm Water Discharges to California Storm Drains and Potential Policies for Effective Prohibition. California Regional Water Quality Control Board. Los Angeles, CA. Duke, L. and K. Shaver. 1999. Widespread failure to comply with U.S. Stormwater Regulations for Industry: Parts I and II in Environmental Engineering Science. 16(4) Eddy, N.
    [Show full text]
  • Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza a (H5N8) Virus in Swans, China, 2020
    Article DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2706.204727 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (H5N8) Virus in Swans, China, 2020 Appendix Materials and Methods Samples Two sick swans, whooper swan (Cygnus cygnus) and mute swan (Cygnus olor) were found almost at the same site in Wuliangsuhai Lake in Bayannur city, Inner Mongolia, China (41.826234°N, 107.54972°E) on 17 October 2020. The swans died soon and virus was detected and collected from organs at the same day. We collected multiple organs (brains, larynx, liver, lung, pancreas, kidney, spleen and rectum) from two dead swans. We sequenced the H5N8 genomes directly from organs, and we used them in whole genetic analysis. The egg passages were used to confirm the genome and to get the long-term preserved viral strains. We inoculated 10-day-old specific pathogen-free chicken embryos (National Poultry Laboratory Animal Resource Center, Harbin Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Harbin 150069, China) with the homogenates of mixed organs, respectively. All chicken embryos dead within 48 hours, the allantoic fluid was harvested, and the hemagglutinin (HA) activity was assayed. Subtypes of influenza viruses were identified initially by using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Viral RNA was extracted from organs or HA positive samples from incubated allantoic fluid using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Germany), reverse transcribed using the primer Un12 and subjected to RT-PCR using the method described in the WHO manual (World Health Organization [WHO], 2002) to further confirm AIV positive. The PCR products of eight fragments of the isolates were sequenced using a set of specific sequencing primers listed in a previous dissertation (1).
    [Show full text]
  • Rideau Waterway: 2000 - 2012 Canadian Heritage River Monitoring Report
    1 Rideau Waterway: 2000 - 2012 Canadian Heritage River Monitoring Report May 2012 i Table of Contents Foreword by Don Marrin, Superintendent, Rideau Canal, Parks Canada Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 1 2.0 Background…………………………………………………………………………………………................. 2 2.1 History……………………………………………………………………………………………………. 2 2.2 Policy and Management Context…………………………………………………….............. 4 2.3 Nomination Values………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 3.0 Cultural Heritage Values…………………………………………………………………………… ………… 6 3.1 Resource condition…………………………………………………………………………………….6 3.2 Selected management practices……………………………………………………………….... 8 3.3 Collaborative conservation………………………………………………………………………. 10 4.0 Recreation Values………………………………………………………………………………………………. 12 4.1 Assessment of recreational values……………………………………………………………… 12 4.2 Key management actions…………………………………………………………………………. 17 5.0 Canadian Heritage River System Integrity Guidelines…………………………………………… 20 6.0 Building Relationships with Aboriginal Peoples……………………………………………………. 22 7.0 Summary and Conclusion…………………………………………………………………………………… 23 References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 24 Appendix A. Chronology of Key Milestones Since Designation…………………………………….. 25 Appendix B. Rideau Canal National Historic Site Management Plan, 2005…………………… 27 Appendix C. Rideau Canal National Historic Site Management Plan, 1996 ……………………30 Front cover: Merrickville, Burritts Rapids, Ottawa, Jones Falls (Photos: Parks Canada) ii Foreword Canadian Heritage Rivers
    [Show full text]
  • Banded & Chinese Mystery Snails Invade the South Nation River
    BANDED & CHINESE MYSTERY SNAILS INVADE THE SOUTH NATION RIVER ABSTRACT From the onset of our monitoring of the molluscan fauna of the South Nation River in 1995, until 2010 the Viviparidae were represented only by the native Campeloma decisum (Brown M.S.). In 2010 South Nation Conservation staff found Cipangopaludina chinensis (Chinese M.S.) in Henderson Creek in Winchester and two summers of ‘Mystery Snail One juvenile among abundant Helisoma Snagaroos’ removed thousands of snails from the creek. In 2012 we found Viviparus campanulatum out on muddy floor of open water Bags of invasive Chinese Mystery ‘georgianus’ (Banded M.S.) in the Castor River at Russell, and then in 2016 a few in the Snails main river downstream of there at High Falls. Amie Ivany found another population of C. chinensis in Hess Creek in 2017, where the shells were mostly broken as if predated. Our monitoring has been sporadic, but we’re encouraging closer attention, especially to the signs of predation by Mammals. Fred Schueler & Aleta Karstad, Fragile Inheritance Natural History, Bishops Mills, ON, Canada. Email: [email protected] First records of the Chinese Mystery Snail, Cipangopaludina chinensis, in the South Nation drainage Said to have been introduced to California as a food species, and now spread by aquarium dumps and on launched boats, this big dark snail has been known from the Rideau River near Carleton University. and is being discovered upstream along the Ottawa River to Mattawa, and in North Bay & Blind River. July 2010 – an SNC team found abundant Cipangopaludina in Henderson Creek, a drain in downtown Winchester.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (And 113 Non-Species Taxa) in Accordance with the 62Nd AOU Supplement (2021), Sorted Taxonomically
    Four-letter (English Name) and Six-letter (Scientific Name) Alpha Codes for 2168 Bird Species (and 113 Non-Species Taxa) in accordance with the 62nd AOU Supplement (2021), sorted taxonomically Prepared by Peter Pyle and David F. DeSante The Institute for Bird Populations www.birdpop.org ENGLISH NAME 4-LETTER CODE SCIENTIFIC NAME 6-LETTER CODE Highland Tinamou HITI Nothocercus bonapartei NOTBON Great Tinamou GRTI Tinamus major TINMAJ Little Tinamou LITI Crypturellus soui CRYSOU Thicket Tinamou THTI Crypturellus cinnamomeus CRYCIN Slaty-breasted Tinamou SBTI Crypturellus boucardi CRYBOU Choco Tinamou CHTI Crypturellus kerriae CRYKER White-faced Whistling-Duck WFWD Dendrocygna viduata DENVID Black-bellied Whistling-Duck BBWD Dendrocygna autumnalis DENAUT West Indian Whistling-Duck WIWD Dendrocygna arborea DENARB Fulvous Whistling-Duck FUWD Dendrocygna bicolor DENBIC Emperor Goose EMGO Anser canagicus ANSCAN Snow Goose SNGO Anser caerulescens ANSCAE + Lesser Snow Goose White-morph LSGW Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Intermediate-morph LSGI Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Lesser Snow Goose Blue-morph LSGB Anser caerulescens caerulescens ANSCCA + Greater Snow Goose White-morph GSGW Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Intermediate-morph GSGI Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Greater Snow Goose Blue-morph GSGB Anser caerulescens atlantica ANSCAT + Snow X Ross's Goose Hybrid SRGH Anser caerulescens x rossii ANSCAR + Snow/Ross's Goose SRGO Anser caerulescens/rossii ANSCRO Ross's Goose
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario's Stream Rehabilitation Manual
    Ontario’s Stream Rehabilitation Manual Written by Mark G. Heaton Rick Grillmayer And Jack G. Imhof Illustrations By Roy DeGuisti Copyright by Ontario Streams 17266 Old Main Street, Belfountain, Ontario L0N 1B0 May 2002 All Rights Reserved. Chapter 1 Introduction The Created Need Restoration, Rehabilitation or Reclamation Building on Experience Partnerships Mean Ownership Chapter 2 Perspectives What is a Watershed? Life in a Dynamic Physical Environment ….. Eco ~ System Stream Corridors The Natural Tendency of Rivers (written by Jack G. Imhof) Chapter 3 Look Before You Leap Project Planning Basics STEP 1: Focus STEP 2: Research and Reconnaissance STEP 3: Evaluation and Impact Assessment STEP 4: Goal, Objectives and Targets Chapter 4 Charting the Course to Action! STEP 5: Plan, Prepare and Consult STEP 6: Implement STEP 7: Monitor and Report Chapter 5 Learning From The Past Gathering The Information Drawing Conclusions... Chapter 6 Techniques Introduction Barrier Management Barrier Modification Fishways Soil Bioengineering (written by R. Grillmayer) Live Staking Fascines Brushlayers Brushmattress Live Cribwall Willow Posts Native Material Revetment Live Rock Revetment Habitat Improvement L.U.N.K.E.R.S. Boulder Placement Half Log Cover Instream Log Cover The Sweeper Palette Cover Cabled Log Jam Channel Rehabilitation Natural Channel Reconstruction (Under Construction) Riparian Corridor Rehabilitation (Under Construction) Woody Debris Management Low Stage Weirs (Under Construction) Wing Deflectors Bibliography Bibliography Appendices Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • RIDEM, Fish & Wildlife Mute Swan Management Plan 2007
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND AND PROVIDENCE PLANTATIONS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT DIVISION OF FISH AND WILDLIFE Mute Swan Management Plan Prepared May 30, 2006 Rhode Island Mute Swan Management Plan I. Introduction The mute swan (Cygnus olor), an indigenous waterfowl species of Europe, was imported into North America in the late 1800s and sold to private estates, public parks, and zoos. Many of the 500+ birds imported between 1910 and 1912 had their flight feathers cut (Phillips 1928) to prevent flight capability. Owners of some birds failed to continue the practice of pinioning and small numbers of birds escaped into the wild and established a feral population. These early introductions to the wild are believed to have occurred along the Hudson River (1910) and on Long Island, New York (1912) (Bull 1964) and likely provided the nucleus for the current Atlantic Flyway mute swan population (Table 1). Table 1.The spread of feral mute swans within the Atlantic Flyway is indicated by early reported sightings as follows: (from Atlantic Flyway Mute Swan Management Plan). State/Province Year State/Province Year New York 1910 Quebec 1965 New Jersey 1919 New Hampshire 1967 Massachusetts 1922 West Virginia 1986 Rhode Island 1923 North Carolina 1989 Pennsylvania 1930s Georgia 1989 Ontario 1934 Maine 1990 Virginia ~1950 South Carolina 1993 Maryland 1954 New Brunswick 1993 Connecticut 1957 Vermont 1993 Delaware 1958 The first report of mute swans in Rhode Island occurred on Block Island in 1923, and the second on Quonochontaug Pond, Charlestown during 1938 (Willey and Halla 1972). Nesting attempts of the birds were first observed on Briggs Marsh, Little Compton in 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 174 ) the Early History of the Mute Swan in England. The
    ( 174 ) THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE MUTE SWAN IN ENGLAND. BY N. F. TICEHURST, M.A., F.R.C.S., ENG. THE earliest particulars of the history of the Mute Swan in England hitherto known are contained in the statements by Saunders (Yarrell's Brit. Birds, IV., p. 327) that " Swans, it is said, were first brought into England from Cyprus by Richard I., who began his reign in 1189 ; and they are particularly mentioned in a manuscript of the time of Edward I. (1272)." These naturally have been extensively copied (not always correctly) and appear in many books on British birds. Thus, Gurney (Early Annals of Ornithology, p. 57) writes " Mr. H. Saunders states that tame Swans are particularly mentioned in a manuscript of 1272, which I have not seen. The passage referred to, as I learn from Mr. Harting who was Saunders' informant, is to be found in the Wardrobe Accounts of Edward I., published by the Society of Antiquaries." As a matter of fact, these Wardrobe Accounts are those for the twenty-first year of Edward I., 1299-1300, so that we may say that the earliest documentary evidence of the existence of the Mute Swan in England so far brought to light belongs to the last year of the thirteenth century. The authority for the statement that it was brought into England by Richard I. from Cyprus, presumably about 1192 at the termination of the third Crusade, would appear to have been known to Newton, as he designates it (Om. Did., p. 930) as "uncertain," but hitherto it has evaded my search.
    [Show full text]