DOCSLIB.ORG

FOEVISION 1St STREET – BERTHA STREET ROADWAY

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FOEVISION 1St STREET – BERTHA STREET ROADWAY DRAINAGE REPORT PERMIT SUBMITTAL (FO EVISION 1st STREET – BERTHA STREET ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT Prepared For: Monroe County Department of Engineering 1100 Simonton Street, Room 2-216 Key West, FL 33040 November 2019 Prepared By: EAC Consulting, Inc. 5959 Blue Lagoon Drive, Suite 410 Miami, FL 33126 Darren Dyer, P.E. CA # 7011 FL License No. 73951 EAC No. 17078.HW01-00 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Project Overview ...................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Scope ............................................................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Survey and Data Collection ......................................................................................................................... 3 Chapter 2 Location and Description of Project ........................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Project Location ........................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Project Description ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Project Typical Sections .......................................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 3 Environmental Permitting Criteria .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Environmental Permitting ........................................................................................................................... 6 3.2 Stormwater Quality Criteria ........................................................................................................................ 6 3.2.1 South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD)............................................................................ 6 3.3 Stormwater Quantity Criteria ..................................................................................................................... 7 3.4 Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDLs) and Nutrient Impaired Water Bodies ........................................... 7 3.5 FEMA Floodplain Impacts ......................................................................................................................... 7 3.6 Environmental Surroundings ...................................................................................................................... 8 3.7 Required Permits ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Chapter 4 Design Criteria and Parameters ............................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Stormwater Management Facilities .......................................................................................................... 9 4.1.1 Retention/Detention Ponds ................................................................................................................... 9 4.1.2 Conveyance Systems ............................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 Optional Pipe Materials ........................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Sea Level Rise ........................................................................................................................................... 10 4.4 Roadway Base Protection ..................................................................................................................... 11 4.5 Project Datum ....................................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 5 Existing Drainage .................................................................................................................................... 12 5.1 Existing Drainage Patterns .................................................................................................................... 12 5.1.1 Bertha Street Drainage System ............................................................................................................. 12 5.1.2 Flagler Avenue & First Street Drainage System ................................................................................... 12 5.1.3 First Street Drainage System ................................................................................................................ 12 5.2 Control Elevations ................................................................................................................................. 13 5.2.1 Seasonal High Groundwater Table (SHGWT) ....................................................................................... 13 5.2.2 Tailwater Elevations .............................................................................................................................. 13 Drainage Report 1st Street / Bertha Street Roadway Improvements 1 5.3 Geotechnical Characteristics ................................................................................................................. 13 5.3.1 Soils Information ................................................................................................................................... 13 5.3.2 Geotechnical Data ................................................................................................................................. 14 Chapter 6 Drainage Analysis Methodology ............................................................................................................ 15 6.1 System Delineation and Parameters .................................................................................................... 15 6.2 Drainage Modeling Overview ............................................................................................................... 15 6.2.1 Existing Stormwater Master Plan ICPR Model ..................................................................................... 15 6.2.2 First Street / Bertha Street ICPR Model ............................................................................................... 15 6.3 Drainage System Modeling ................................................................................................................... 15 6.4 Design Storms and Rainfall Depths ...................................................................................................... 16 6.5 Time of Concentration .......................................................................................................................... 16 6.6 Pre‐Development ICPR Model .............................................................................................................. 16 6.7 Post‐Development ICPR Model ............................................................................................................ 17 Chapter 7 Stormwater Management Systems Evaluation ..................................................................................... 18 7.1 Proposed Drainage Patterns ................................................................................................................. 18 7.1.1 System 1 – Bertha Street ...................................................................................................................... 18 7.1.2 System 2 – Flagler Avenue & First Street ............................................................................................. 18 7.1.3 System 3 – First Street .......................................................................................................................... 18 7.2 Stormwater Management Facilities Evaluation ................................................................................... 19 7.3 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................. 19 Appendix A – Figures, Exhibits & Maps Appendix B – Pre‐Development Drainage Maps Appendix C – Post‐Development Drainage Maps Appendix D – Regulatory Calculations Appendix E – Site Facility Calculations Appendix F – Conveyance Calculations Appendix G – Pre‐Development ICPR Model Appendix H – Post‐Development ICPR Model Appendix I – Model Summary Tables Appendix J – Geotechnical, Environmental & SLR Reports Appendix K – Record Documents Drainage Report 1st Street / Bertha Street Roadway Improvements 2 Chapter 1 Project Overview 1.1 Introduction Monroe County Engineering and Public Works Department is proposing roadway and streetscape improvements for First Street and Bertha Street on the island of Key West. In conjunction with the proposed streetscape improvements, the County is proposing to replace and upgrade the existing drainage system. Currently, the surrounding lands consist of residential and commercial areas. The project is located in Monroe County Florida and is within the jurisdictional boundary of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). The regulations of SFWMD will govern the minimum stormwater management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Key West & the Lower Keys
    © Lonely Planet Publications Key West & the Lower Keys in the ’60s to lend the island a South 40 NEWFOUND HARBOR Pacific look when it was used as the set- ting for the movie PT-109. Location: 0.5 nautical miles (1km) A series of mooring buoys are in place south of Newfound Harbor Keys along the west side of the reef, and day Depth Range: Surface-18ft (5m) marker 50 lies to the south. The top of Access: Boat the reef is very shallow, rising almost Expertise Rating: Novice to the surface in two places. Maximum depth is about 8ft (2.4m) on the land- -169 ward side and 18ft (5m) on the seaward side. Soft corals dominate much of the Closer to shore than most other reefs, reef, but boulder-like accumulations this sanctuary preservation area is a of calcium carbonate from hard corals good alternative when weather pre- form the basic structure. vents diving at nearby Looe Key. Just Fishermen frequented the reef until northwest is low-lying Little Palm Is- the summer of 1997 when the SPA went land, now home to an exclusive resort. into effect, and the resident fish popula- The namesake palm trees were planted tion has been steadily increasing ever Key West & Lower Keys Snipe Keys Mud Keys 24º40’N 81º55’W 81º50’W 81º45’W 81º40’W Waltz Key Basin Lower Harbor Bluefish Channel Keys Bay Keys Northwest Channel Calda Bank Cottrell Key Great White Heron National Wildlife Refuge Big Coppitt Key Fleming Key 24º35’N Lower Keys Big Mullet Key Medical Center 1 Stock Island Boca Chica Key Mule Key Key West Naval Air Station Duval St Archer Key Truman Ave Flagler
    [Show full text]
  • Bookletchart™ Florida Keys – Sombrero Key to Dry Tortugas NOAA Chart 11434
    BookletChart™ Florida Keys – Sombrero Key to Dry Tortugas NOAA Chart 11434 A reduced-scale NOAA nautical chart for small boaters When possible, use the full-size NOAA chart for navigation. Published by the Currents are variable along the edge of the reefs, being influenced by winds, by differences of barometric pressure in the Gulf and the Straits National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of Florida, and by the tides. At times there are strong tidal currents National Ocean Service through the passages between the keys. Office of Coast Survey Between Key West Harbor and Boca Grande Channel there is an extensive shoal area in which are several small scattered keys. The white www.NauticalCharts.NOAA.gov sand beaches of the southernmost keys are easily discernible from 888-990-NOAA seaward. A large house on Ballast Key (24°31.3'N., 81°57.8'W.) is reported to be prominent. What are Nautical Charts? A small-craft channel, marked by private daybeacons, extends through the shoal area from Key West to the N side of Boca Grande Key. The Nautical charts are a fundamental tool of marine navigation. They show channel has a reported controlling depth of 5 feet except S of Mule Key, water depths, obstructions, buoys, other aids to navigation, and much near Key West, where the controlling depth is 2 feet. Local knowledge is more. The information is shown in a way that promotes safe and advised. In 2009, unexploded ordinance was reported about ½ mile N of efficient navigation. Chart carriage is mandatory on the commercial Boca Grande Key within a 200 yard radius of a visible wreck at ships that carry America’s commerce.
    [Show full text]
  • Shallow Water Wildlife and Habitat Protection Working Group
    Shallow Water Wildlife and Habitat Protection Working Group Draft Recommendations for Existing Wildlife Management Areas and Proposed New Zones UPPER KEYS UPPER KEYS UPPER KEYS Page 2 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Dove Key Wildlife Management Area Dove Key: Area of very shallow flats that are heavily used by a variety of birds as well as bonefish and other desirable fish species. Existing Access Restrictions: No- motor zone on tidal flats; area around the two small islands closed. Proposed Recommendations: Recommendation 1: Determine if closed area is appropriate. Recommendation 2: Keep Dove Key and Rodriguez Key as separate areas. Recommendation 3: Connect Dove Key and Rodriguez Key areas. Page 3 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Eastern Lake Surprise Wildlife Management Area Eastern Lake Surprise: Protect the endangered American crocodile and West Indian manatee that inhabit the area from vessel traffic. Existing Access Restrictions: Idle speed only/no-wake zone east of highway U.S. 1. Proposed Recommendation: Maintain existing zoning and restrictions. Page 4 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Rodriguez Key Wildlife Management Area Rodriguez Key: Area of very shallow flats that are heavily used by a variety of birds as well as bonefish and other desirable fish species. Existing Access Restrictions: No- motor zone on tidal flats. Proposed Recommendations: Recommendation 1: Maintain existing restrictions and establish No Anchor Zone within existing area. Recommendation 2: Keep Dove Key and Rodriguez Key as separate areas. Recommendation 3: Connect Dove Key and Rodriguez Key areas. Page 5 of 58 FOR SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL CONSIDERATION 7/2/2013 Tavernier Key Wildlife Management Area Tavernier Key: Area of very shallow flats that are heavily used by a variety of birds as well as bonefish and other desirable fish species.
    [Show full text]
  • Key West National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service This blue goose, designed by J. N. "Ding" Darling, has become a symbol Key West and Great White Heron National Wildlife Refuges of the National Wildlife Refuge System. Key West National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1908 as a Sanctuary Preservation Areas have been designated at Sand Key, Boating in the backcountry is challenging due to very shallow preserve and breeding ground for native birds and other wildlife. Rock Key and Eastern Dry Rocks (all located within Key West water depths. If you should run aground, please do not try to The refuge encompasses more than 200,000 acres with only 2,000 NWR) to protect coral reef habitats. power-off the area since this results in extreme damage to the acres of land. The area is home to more than 250 species of birds environment. Instead, trim up the motor and try to walk the and is important for sea turtle nesting. For the most current National Marine Sanctuary regulations boat to deeper water. You might have to wait for a high-tide to please contact the Sanctuary office at 305/809 4700. accomplish this. All of the islands in the refuge are designated as a part of the National Wilderness Preservation System. Designated wilderness Refuge Information/Visitor Center ...............................305/872 0774 areas are managed to minimize human impacts and influences and Sanctuary Regulations in Refuges to let natural processes occur without intervention. The refuge Refuge Headquarters ...........................................................305/872 2239 limits human use and influence in order to preserve the quality, n No fishing allowed in Sanctuary Preservation Areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of the Cruise Ship Industry on the Quality of Life in Key West
    THE IMPACTS OF THE CRUISE SHIP INDUSTRY ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN KEY WEST RFQ No: 04-001 City of Key West Naval Properties Local Redevelopment Authority Submitted By: Thomas J. Murray & Associates, Inc. Submitted April 8, 2005 Revised October 2005 Contact Person and Project Manager THOMAS J. MURRAY P.O. Box 1083, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 The Impact of the Cruise Ship Industry on the Quality of Life in Key West ________________________________________________________________________ Assumptions and Limiting Conditions Information from secondary sources was utilized in this report. While the author believes such information is accurate, the author does not represent or warrant any information from secondary sources. Opinions contained herein are strictly those of the author. The author shall not be liable to any person or entity for actions taken in reliance thereon. This report is issued as of the date first above written. The author is under no obligation to update this report for any change in circumstances, information, law, etc. Only the addressee is entitled to rely upon this report. Thomas J. Murray & Associates, Inc. The Impact of the Cruise Ship Industry on the Quality of Life in Key West TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Economic Impact ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • For Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Consideration at Sanctuary Advisory Council Meeting June 17, 2014
    Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review DRAFT Working Group Recommendations: Coral Reef Ecosystem Restoration Working Group and Shallow Water Wildlife and Habitat Protection Working Group For Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Consideration at Sanctuary Advisory Council Meeting June 17, 2014 Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review Florida Keys National Wildlife Refuges Complex Backcountry Management Plan Update Table of Contents Introduction and Background ....................................................................................................................... 2 Goals and Objectives for Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review ............................................................ 4 Principles for Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review ............................................................................... 5 Coral Reef Ecosystem Restoration Working Group ................................................................................... 6 Summary of Working Group Recommendations for Sanctuary Advisory Council Consideration .............. 7 Shallow Water Wildlife and Habitat Protection Working Group ........................................................... 10 Summary of Working Group Recommendations for Sanctuary Advisory Council Consideration ............ 11 Draft Index Map for the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Advisory Council Marine Zoning and Regulatory Review, 2013 .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Latitude Longitude Buoy Name
    Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Mooring Buoy Locations (Alphabetical Order) Coordinates are not to be used for navigation- always use a chart for navigation. This list is for reference only. Operator is responsible for their vessel when tied to a mooring buoy. Buoys may be missing or damaged. Coordinates may not be accurate. Call 305-852-7717 or 305-809-4700 to report a lost or missing buoy. Latitude Longitude Buoy Name (dd mm.mmm) (dd mm.mmm) Nine Foot Stake 1 24° 28.356 ' 81° 45.820 ' Nine Foot Stake 2 24° 28.294 ' 81° 45.854 ' Nine Foot Stake 3 24° 28.327 ' 81° 45.888 ' Adelaide Baker (Shipwreck Trail) 24° 42.179 ' 80° 53.676 ' Adolphus Busch Wreck 1 24° 31.814 ' 81° 27.710 ' Adolphus Busch Wreck 2 24° 31.786 ' 81° 27.699 ' Adolphus Busch Wreck 3 24° 31.791 ' 81° 27.684 ' Adolphus Busch Wreck 4 24° 31.851 ' 81° 27.680 ' Alligator Reef 0 24° 50.716 ' 80° 37.444 ' Alligator Reef 1 24° 50.740 ' 80° 37.421 ' Alligator Reef 2 24° 50.775 ' 80° 37.380 ' Alligator Reef 3 24° 50.785 ' 80° 37.338 ' Alligator Reef 4 24° 50.813 ' 80° 37.307 ' Alligator Reef 5 24° 50.465 ' 80° 37.355 ' Alligator Reef 6 24° 50.523 ' 80° 37.174 ' Alligator Wreck 24° 51.065 ' 80° 37.083 ' Amesbury Wreck (Shipwreck Trail) 24° 37.397 ' 81° 58.912 ' Archer Key 1 24° 33.598 ' 81° 52.899 ' Archer Key 2 24° 33.573 ' 81° 52.892 ' Archer Key 3 24° 33.555 ' 81° 52.819 ' Benwood Wreck 1 (Shipwreck Trail) 25° 03.128 ' 80° 19.920 ' Benwood Wreck 2 (Shipwreck Trail) 25° 03.141 ' 80° 19.936 ' Benwood Wreck 3 (Shipwreck Trail) 25° 03.158 ' 80° 19.916 ' Benwood Wreck 4 (Shipwreck
    [Show full text]
  • The Impacts of the Cruise Ship Industry on the Quality of Life in Key West
    THE IMPACTS OF THE CRUISE SHIP INDUSTRY ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN KEY WEST RFQ No: 04-001 City of Key West Naval Properties Local Redevelopment Authority Submitted By: Thomas J. Murray & Associates, Inc. Submitted April 8, 2005 Revised October 2005 Contact Person and Project Manager THOMAS J. MURRAY P.O. Box 1083, Gloucester Point, Virginia 23062 The Impact of the Cruise Ship Industry on the Quality of Life in Key West 3. THE IMPACT ON THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT 3.A Historical Review of Key West Channel and Harbor This section focuses on the history of the main ship channel and harbor at Key West, and explores the historic and current use by large (greater than about 50 feet long), deep draft vessels and cruise ships. The main ship channel south of Key West is used by transit in and out of the Port of Key West and the harbor is used for turning of large vessels. Prior to formal settlement in the early 1800s, the deep natural channel and deep protected harbor were likely used by native Americans, pirates, Bahamian wreckers, and the Spanish while in transit from the Caribbean, Cuba and the Bahamas to parts north and into the Gulf of Mexico. Prior to the completion of the Overseas Railroad to Key West in 1912 all commerce in and out of Key West occurred via vessels of all sizes. From the beginning "Key West's early settlers found that the surrounding waters, at worst, provided a livelihood, and at best, brought them wealth. Few family heads arrived without some type of sailing craft, and owners of large sloops and schooners found wealth in Havana and the West Indies trade." (Langley 1973).
    [Show full text]
  • US Department of Commerce Mote Marine Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sarasota, FL Silver Spring, MD
    NOAA/Mote Marine Laboratory Joint Publication NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA 168 NOAA LISD Current References 2004-3 Mote Technical Report No. 950 Coastal and Estuarine Data Archaeology and Rescue Program A. Y. Cantillo, E. Collins and E. Clark (Editors) March 2004 US Department of Commerce Mote Marine Laboratory National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Sarasota, FL Silver Spring, MD a NOAA/Mote Marine Laboratory Joint Publication NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS CCMA 168 NOAA LISD Current References 2004-3 Mote Technical Report No. 950 Charles M. Breder, Jr.: Key West, 1928 A. Y. Cantillo NOAA National Ocean Service E. Collins NOAA Central Library S. Stover and K. Hale Mote Marine Laboratory (Editors) Introduction by C. A. Luer Mote Marine Laboratory March 2004 United States National Oceanic and Department of Commerce Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Donald L. Evans Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr. Jamison S. Hawkins Secretary Vice-Admiral (Ret.), Acting Assistant Administrator Administrator For further information please call or write: NOAA/National Ocean Service/National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science 1305 East West Hwy. Silver Spring, MD 20910 301 713 3020 NOAA Central Library 1315 East West Hwy. Silver Spring, MD 20910 301 713 2600 Arthur Vining Davis Library Mote Marine Laboratory 1600 Ken Thompson Parkway Sarasota, FL 34236 941 388 4441 Disclaimer This report has been reviewed by the National Ocean Service of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and approved for publication. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for their use by the United States Government. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF PLATES..................................................................................................................i ABSTRACT.........................................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION by Carl A.
    [Show full text]
  • Demolition Siteworkhauling Dumpsters
    FACING THE JUDGE MAKING MUSIC Keys man accused It’sanannual rite: of school threats The conch shell heads to court, 2A blowing contest, 3B VOLUME 65-NO.17 STAY CONNECTED /KEYSINFONET NEWSALL DAY. YOUR WAY. WWW.FLKEYSNEWS.COM FACEBOOK.COM WEDNESDAY FEBRUARY 28,2018 50 cents THE FLORIDAKEYS 778679022222 IMMIGRATION Man in Keys jail settobe deported. Location: Vietnam Authorities won’t releasewhy he wasdetained in August 2017. He’s 38 and leftVietnam as arefugee when he was10. BY DAVID GOODHUE [email protected] APalm Beach Gardens man is being held in the Monroe County jail await- ing deportation back to his native Viet- MARATHON HONORS nam because of a2006conviction for conspiracy to deal ecstasy and marijua- na, for which he completed his prison PARKLAND VICTIMS time in 2011,two years earlier than his original sentence. Hundreds of students watch as Marathon It’s not clear why Thang T. Cao, 38, High School students and administrators was detained by U.S. Immigration and walk one by one with rosesduringa Customs Enforcement agents in Au- ceremonyTuesdayinmemoryofthe 17 gust 2017 because ICE won’t discuss victims killed by agunman at Marjory the case. Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland “That is something Icannot release,” ICE spokesman Nestor Yglesias said in on Feb. 14.Each victim’sname and agewere an email last week. called out prior to amomentofsilence after There are no federal charges listed in the roseswereput in avaseinthe school’s his file and he faces no local charges in courtyard. Monroe County, said Deputy Becky PHOTOSBYKATIE ATKINS Keynoter Herrin, media relations officer for the Sheriff’s Office.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Florida Keys Layout
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Florida Keys National Wildlife Refuges The National Wildlife Refuges of the Florida Keys are unmatched anywhere in the world. They are a part of the National Wildlife Refuge System–– an extensive network of lands and waters protected and managed especially for wildlife and its habitat. A branch of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Wildlife Refuge System protects more than 92 million acres of land and water from Alaska to the Florida Keys and from the South Pacific to Maine, preserving critical habitat for 170 federally listed threatened or endangered species and other wildlife. Symbolized by the Blue Goose, these national treasures inspire more than 30 million visitors a year. Florida Keys Welcome to the Florida Keys! There National are four National Wildlife Refuges Wildlife located in this extraordinary and Refuges seemingly endless expanse of sea, islands and sky––the National Key Deer Refuge, Great White Heron, Key West and Crocodile Lake National Wildlife Refuges. These refuges are part of a vast subtropical ecosystem. This distinctive chain of This blue goose, islands stretches almost 150 miles designed by J. N. from the southeastern tip of Florida, “Ding” Darling, curving gently westward dividing the has become the aqua-green waters of the Gulf of symbol of the Mexico from the distant deep blue National Wildlife Atlantic Ocean. These refuges Refuge System. support several habitats that sustain a wide variety of plants and animals, some of which do not exist anywhere else on earth. The four refuges include more than 416,000 acres of land and open water.
    [Show full text]
  • Channel Marking Master Plan for the Florida Keys, Monroe County
    CHANNEL MARKING MASTER PLAN FOR THE FLORIDA KEYS January 1998 Richard Jones Channel Marking Planner Submitted in fulfillment of DEP Agreement No. SWPP96-06 By the Monroe County Department of Marine Resources George Garrett, Director Robin Dye, Marine Resources Planner Richard Jones, Channel Marking Planner PREFACE i This document represents the channel marking master plan as described in both the Channel/Reef Marking Action Plan of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Management Plan, and the Development of a Comprehensive Boat Channel Marking Plan for the Florida Keys by the Monroe County Department of Marine Resources. Funding for the channel marking master plan was provided by a $35,000 grant from the Special Waterway Projects Program of The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Waterway Management. In- kind matching funds were provided by the Monroe County Department of Marine Resources. TABLE OF CONTENTS ii List of Tables ............................................................................................................iv General Introduction .................................................................................................. 1 Resource Damage Overview ..................................................................................... 5 Users ................................................................................................................ 5 Sources of Impacts........................................................................................... 7 Effects of Impacts
    [Show full text]