DOCSLIB.ORG

Exploiting Fine-Grain Concurrency Analytical Insights in Superscalar Processor Design

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Exploiting Fine-Grain Concurrency Analytical Insights in Superscalar Processor Design Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Department of Electrical and Computer Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technical Reports Engineering 8-1-1991 Exploiting Fine-Grain Concurrency Analytical Insights in Superscalar Processor Design Pradeep K. Dubey Purdue University George B. Adams III Purdue University Michael J. Flynn Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ecetr Dubey, Pradeep K.; Adams, George B. III; and Flynn, Michael J., "Exploiting Fine-Grain Concurrency Analytical Insights in Superscalar Processor Design" (1991). Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technical Reports. Paper 746. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ecetr/746 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. EXPLOITING FINE-GRAIN CONCURRENCY: ANALYTICAL INSIGHTS IN SUPERSCALAR PROCESSOR DESIGN Pradeep K. Dubey George B. Adams III Michael J. Flynn * School of Electrical Engineering Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana 47907 Purdue University TR-EE 91-31 August 1991 * Department of Electrical Engineering, StanfordUniversity ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors thank Prof. Henry Dietz, Prof. Jose Fortes, Prof. Mike Atallah, Prof. Arup Bose, and Raymond Kamin, all of Purdue University. We also thank Dr. James T. Kuehn at the Supercomputing Research Center in Bowie, Maryland, and the management at the University Computing Center at the California State University, Sacramento, for making their Multiflow computers available for this research. Finally, we thank Mr. Kent G. Fielden of Intel Corporation, Santa Clara for making available technical documentation crucial to the experiments. U i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES...................................................... ............................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................... ....................... viii LISTOF SYMBOLS ................................................................................. .......... ....... xvii ABSTRACT......................................... ................... .............................................. xxi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION.................................................. ................ I 1.1 Motivation..... .......................................................................... .......... I 1.2 Review of Concurrency Representation, Detection and Scheduling Techniques................... ...................... 2 1.2.1 RepresentingConcurrency........................................................... 3 1.2.2 Dependencies .......................................................... ...................... 5 1.2.3 Detecting, Dispatching and Scheduling ConcurrentOperations....................... .................................. 9 1.2.4 ImplementationTradeoffs .... ............. ........... ............................. 20 1.2.5 Summ ary........................... ............... ............................................. 24 1.3 DissertationOverview........................................................ ............... ....... 30 CHAPTER 2 OPTIMAL PIPELINING ...................................................... ........ 32 2.1 Introduction.......................... ...................................................... 32 2.1.1 Previous Research ................................. ............... ............... 33 2.2 A Generic Model .............................. ...................... ........... ........... ........ 34 2.3 Inferences .............................................................................. ...................... 38 2.3.1 Correspondence with Previously Published Experimental Results.................................................................... 53 2.4 Potential Improvements to the Model..................... ............. ................... 53 2.5 Summary .................................................................... ................ ............... 55 CHAPTER 3 BRANCHSTRATEGIESrMODELLINGAND OPTIMIZATION ............................... 59 3.1 Inttoduction ................................................................................. ........... 59 3.1.1 PreviousResearch................................... ....................... ........... 59 3.2 TheM odel............................................................................................ 60 3.3 ClassificationofBranchStrategies........................... ............................... 62 3 4 BranchPrediCtion ..... ........................................... .............................. ..... 65 3.5 Results ........... .............................. ........................................................... 70 3.5.1 Inferences..................................... .......................................... 70 iv Page 3.6 HybridStrategies ...................................... ......................................... 76 3.6.1 Inferences....................................................................... ............... 77 3.7 Sum m ary............................................................................ ................. 81 CHAPTER 4 SUPERPIPELINED VERSUS SUPERSCALAR ........... 82 4.1 Introduction............................................................................ ................. 82 4.2 Superpipeline/Superscalar Tradeoff Model.......................................... 82 4.3 Performance Limits.............. ........... ............................................. 85 4.4 ModellingResourceUtilization..................................... .......... 89 4.5 Summary ........... ............... ................................ ............ .............. 90 CHAPTER 5 INSTRUCTION WINDOW SIZE TRADEOFFS AND CHARACTERIZATION OF PROGRAM PARALLELISM.... 91 5.1 Introduction................................................................................................. 91 5.2 The Analytic Performance Model ...... ..................................................... 92 5.3 C ostofB ranches.... .......................... .................................................... 98 5.3.1 CalculatingMispredictionDelayResulting from Speculative Execution...................................................... 99 5.3.2 Alternate Computation for Pu ,................... ............................... 101 5.3.3 Dynamic Scheduling with Finite Lookahead ............................. 103 5.4 Experimental Results ............. .................. ...................................... 103 5.5 Potential Improvements to the Model................... ............. ..................... 113 5.6 Summary................................................... .............. ............................... 120 CHAPTER 6 SPECTRUM OF CHOICES: SUPERPIPELINED, SUPERSCALAR OR MULTIPROCESSOR? ........ 122 6.1 Introduction........ ................................................................... .......... 122 6.2 DelaysAssociatedwithMultiprocessors ....... 122 6.2.1 Dependency Delay ............ ................ ............. ................ 124 6.2.2 OperandFetch Delay ............ ................................... 126 6.3 Utilization Constraints ........... ............... ....................................... 126 6.3.1 Characteristics of Utilization Curves ............... ..................... 127 6.3.2 Alternate Characterization of Program Parallelism.................... 129 6.4 Results ....................................................................... ............................... 132 6.5 CombinedSystems ........................................— .......... ................ 139 6.6 Summary ............ ...................................... ............... 142 CHAPTER 7 CONCLUSIONS ....... ................. ........... .............. 143 7.1 Summary ............... ............ ....................................................................... 143 7.2 Contributions ..... ........................................................................................ 144 CHAPTER 8 FUTURE RESEARCH................................................................. 146 8.1 Out-of-sequence Execution Versus LocalityofOperandReferences....................................................... 146 8.2 Cosi/Performance Tradeoffs for Concurrency Detection in Different Execution Phases................................................................... 153 V Page 8.3 OtherMeasuresforDistancebetweenlnstructionPairs......................... 154 8.4 Recursive Performance Modelling ................ ....................... ................... 154 LIST OF REFERENCES...... ............................................................................ 157 APPENDICES AppendixA ..................... ..................................................... .................... ........ 163 Appendix B .......I.......................................................................... ....................... 182 Appendix C (158 page source code listing; not included) ................................ 194 vi LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1.1 Gomparisonofconcurrencydetectionandschedulingstrategies...................... 11 2.1 Nomenclature and nominal values of model parameters..... ..................... 37 2.2 Normalized throughput (Gnorm) versus static overhead (c).......... 39 2.3 Normalized throughput (Gnorm) versus dynamic overhead (k)..... 39 2.4 Normalized throughput (Gnorm) versus constant term of the utilization model (Mmax) ....................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GPU Implementation Over IPTV Software Defined Networking
    Esmeralda Hysenbelliu. Int. Journal of Engineering Research and Application www.ijera.com ISSN : 2248-9622, Vol. 7, Issue 8, ( Part -1) August 2017, pp.41-45 RESEARCH ARTICLE OPEN ACCESS GPU Implementation over IPTV Software Defined Networking Esmeralda Hysenbelliu* Information Technology Faculty, Polytechnic University of Tirana, Sheshi “Nënë Tereza”, Nr.4, Tirana, Albania Corresponding author: Esmeralda Hysenbelliu ABSTRACT One of the most important issue in IPTV Software defined Network is Bandwidth Issue and Quality of Service at the client side. Decidedly, it is required high level quality of images in low bandwidth and for this reason it is needed different transcoding standards (Compression of image as much as it is possible without destroying the quality of it) as H.264, H265, VP8 and VP9. During a test performed in SMC IPTV SDN Cloud Network, it was observed that with a server HP ProLiant DL380 g6 with two physical processors there was not possible to transcode in format H.264 more than 30 channels simultaneously because CPU’s achieved 100%. This is the reason why it was immediately needed to use Graphic Processing Units called GPU’s which offer high level images processing. After GPU superscalar processor was integrated and done functional via module NVENC of FFEMPEG Program, number of channels transcoded simultaneously was tremendous increased (more than 100 channels). The aim of this paper is to real implement GPU superscalar processors in IPTV Cloud Networks by achieving improvement of performance to more than 60%. Keywords - GPU superscalar processor, Performance Improvement, NVENC, CUDA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of Submission: 01 -05-2017 Date of acceptance: 19-08-2017 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer Hardware Architecture Lecture 4
    Computer Hardware Architecture Lecture 4 Manfred Liebmann Technische Universit¨atM¨unchen Chair of Optimal Control Center for Mathematical Sciences, M17 [email protected] November 10, 2015 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 Reading List • Pacheco - An Introduction to Parallel Programming (Chapter 1 - 2) { Introduction to computer hardware architecture from the parallel programming angle • Hennessy-Patterson - Computer Architecture - A Quantitative Approach { Reference book for computer hardware architecture All books are available on the Moodle platform! Computer Hardware Architecture 1 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 UMA Architecture Figure 1: A uniform memory access (UMA) multicore system Access times to main memory is the same for all cores in the system! Computer Hardware Architecture 2 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 NUMA Architecture Figure 2: A nonuniform memory access (UMA) multicore system Access times to main memory differs form core to core depending on the proximity of the main memory. This architecture is often used in dual and quad socket servers, due to improved memory bandwidth. Computer Hardware Architecture 3 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 Cache Coherence Figure 3: A shared memory system with two cores and two caches What happens if the same data element z1 is manipulated in two different caches? The hardware enforces cache coherence, i.e. consistency between the caches. Expensive! Computer Hardware Architecture 4 Manfred Liebmann November 10, 2015 False Sharing The cache coherence protocol works on the granularity of a cache line. If two threads manipulate different element within a single cache line, the cache coherency protocol is activated to ensure consistency, even if every thread is only manipulating its own data.
    [Show full text]
  • Superscalar Fall 2020
    CS232 Superscalar Fall 2020 Superscalar What is superscalar - A superscalar processor has more than one set of functional units and executes multiple independent instructions during a clock cycle by simultaneously dispatching multiple instructions to different functional units in the processor. - You can think of a superscalar processor as there are more than one washer, dryer, and person who can fold. So, it allows more throughput. - The order of instruction execution is usually assisted by the compiler. The hardware and the compiler assure that parallel execution does not violate the intent of the program. - Example: • Ordinary pipeline: four stages (Fetch, Decode, Execute, Write back), one clock cycle per stage. Executing 6 instructions take 9 clock cycles. I0: F D E W I1: F D E W I2: F D E W I3: F D E W I4: F D E W I5: F D E W cc: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 • 2-degree superscalar: attempts to process 2 instructions simultaneously. Executing 6 instructions take 6 clock cycles. I0: F D E W I1: F D E W I2: F D E W I3: F D E W I4: F D E W I5: F D E W cc: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Limitations of Superscalar - The above example assumes that the instructions are independent of each other. So, it’s easily to push them into the pipeline and superscalar. However, instructions are usually relevant to each other. Just like the hazards in pipeline, superscalar has limitations too. - There are several fundamental limitations the system must cope, which are true data dependency, procedural dependency, resource conflict, output dependency, and anti- dependency.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multiscalar Architecture
    THE MULTISCALAR ARCHITECTURE by MANOJ FRANKLIN A thesis submitted in partial ful®llment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Computer Sciences) at the UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN Ð MADISON 1993 THE MULTISCALAR ARCHITECTURE Manoj Franklin Under the supervision of Associate Professor Gurindar S. Sohi at the University of Wisconsin-Madison ABSTRACT The centerpiece of this thesis is a new processing paradigm for exploiting instruction level parallelism. This paradigm, called the multiscalar paradigm, splits the program into many smaller tasks, and exploits ®ne-grain parallelism by executing multiple, possibly (control and/or data) depen- dent tasks in parallel using multiple processing elements. Splitting the instruction stream at statically determined boundaries allows the compiler to pass substantial information about the tasks to the hardware. The processing paradigm can be viewed as extensions of the superscalar and multiprocess- ing paradigms, and shares a number of properties of the sequential processing model and the data¯ow processing model. The multiscalar paradigm is easily realizable, and we describe an implementation of the multis- calar paradigm, called the multiscalar processor. The central idea here is to connect multiple sequen- tial processors, in a decoupled and decentralized manner, to achieve overall multiple issue. The mul- tiscalar processor supports speculative execution, allows arbitrary dynamic code motion (facilitated by an ef®cient hardware memory disambiguation mechanism), exploits communication localities, and does all of these with hardware that is fairly straightforward to build. Other desirable aspects of the implementation include decentralization of the critical resources, absence of wide associative searches, and absence of wide interconnection/data paths.
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Processor Architecture
    A. González Trends in Processor Architecture Trends in Processor Architecture Antonio González Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain 1. Past Trends Processors have undergone a tremendous evolution throughout their history. A key milestone in this evolution was the introduction of the microprocessor, term that refers to a processor that is implemented in a single chip. The first microprocessor was introduced by Intel under the name of Intel 4004 in 1971. It contained about 2,300 transistors, was clocked at 740 KHz and delivered 92,000 instructions per second while dissipating around 0.5 watts. Since then, practically every year we have witnessed the launch of a new microprocessor, delivering significant performance improvements over previous ones. Some studies have estimated this growth to be exponential, in the order of about 50% per year, which results in a cumulative growth of over three orders of magnitude in a time span of two decades [12]. These improvements have been fueled by advances in the manufacturing process and innovations in processor architecture. According to several studies [4][6], both aspects contributed in a similar amount to the global gains. The manufacturing process technology has tried to follow the scaling recipe laid down by Robert N. Dennard in the early 1970s [7]. The basics of this technology scaling consists of reducing transistor dimensions by a factor of 30% every generation (typically 2 years) while keeping electric fields constant. The 30% scaling in the dimensions results in doubling the transistor density (doubling transistor density every two years was predicted in 1975 by Gordon Moore and is normally referred to as Moore’s Law [21][22]).
    [Show full text]
  • Intro Evolution of Superscalar Processor
    Superscalar Processors Superscalar Processors vs. VLIW • 7.1 Introduction • 7.2 Parallel decoding • 7.3 Superscalar instruction issue • 7.4 Shelving • 7.5 Register renaming • 7.6 Parallel execution • 7.7 Preserving the sequential consistency of instruction execution • 7.8 Preserving the sequential consistency of exception processing • 7.9 Implementation of superscalar CISC processors using a superscalar RISC core • 7.10 Case studies of superscalar processors TECH Computer Science CH01 Superscalar Processor: Intro Emergence and spread of superscalar processors • Parallel Issue • Parallel Execution • {Hardware} Dynamic Instruction Scheduling • Currently the predominant class of processors 4Pentium 4PowerPC 4UltraSparc 4AMD K5- 4HP PA7100- 4DEC α Evolution of superscalar processor Specific tasks of superscalar processing Parallel decoding {and Dependencies check} Decoding and Pre-decoding • What need to be done • Superscalar processors tend to use 2 and sometimes even 3 or more pipeline cycles for decoding and issuing instructions • >> Pre-decoding: 4shifts a part of the decode task up into loading phase 4resulting of pre-decoding f the instruction class f the type of resources required for the execution f in some processor (e.g. UltraSparc), branch target addresses calculation as well 4the results are stored by attaching 4-7 bits • + shortens the overall cycle time or reduces the number of cycles needed The principle of perdecoding Number of perdecode bits used Specific tasks of superscalar processing: Issue 7.3 Superscalar instruction issue • How and when to send the instruction(s) to EU(s) Instruction issue policies of superscalar processors: Issue policies ---Performance, tread-----Æ Issue rate {How many instructions/cycle} Issue policies: Handing Issue Blockages • CISC about 2 • RISC: Issue stopped by True dependency Issue order of instructions • True dependency Æ (Blocked: need to wait) Aligned vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Parallel Architectures MICHAEL J
    Parallel Architectures MICHAEL J. FLYNN AND KEVIN W. RUDD Stanford University ^[email protected]&; ^[email protected]& PARALLEL ARCHITECTURES currently performing different phases of processing an instruction. This does not Parallel or concurrent operation has achieve concurrency of execution (with many different forms within a computer system. Using a model based on the multiple actions being taken on objects) different streams used in the computa- but does achieve a concurrency of pro- tion process, we represent some of the cessing—an improvement in efficiency different kinds of parallelism available. upon which almost all processors de- A stream is a sequence of objects such pend today. as data, or of actions such as instruc- Techniques that exploit concurrency tions. Each stream is independent of all of execution, often called instruction- other streams, and each element of a level parallelism (ILP), are also com- stream can consist of one or more ob- mon. Two architectures that exploit ILP jects or actions. We thus have four com- are superscalar and VLIW (very long binations that describe most familiar parallel architectures: instruction word). These techniques schedule different operations to execute (1) SISD: single instruction, single data concurrently based on analyzing the de- stream. This is the traditional uni- pendencies between the operations processor [Figure 1(a)]. within the instruction stream—dynami- (2) SIMD: single instruction, multiple cally at run time in a superscalar pro- data stream. This includes vector cessor and statically at compile time in processors as well as massively par- a VLIW processor. Both ILP approaches allel processors [Figure 1(b)].
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Processor Design: Fundamentals of Superscalar
    Fundamentals of Superscalar Processors John Paul Shen Intel Corporation Mikko H. Lipasti University of Wisconsin WAVELAND PRESS, INC. Long Grove, Illinois To Our parents: Paul and Sue Shen Tarja and Simo Lipasti Our spouses: Amy C. Shen Erica Ann Lipasti Our children: Priscilla S. Shen, Rachael S. Shen, and Valentia C. Shen Emma Kristiina Lipasti and Elias Joel Lipasti For information about this book, contact: Waveland Press, Inc. 4180 IL Route 83, Suite 101 Long Grove, IL 60047-9580 (847) 634-0081 info @ waveland.com www.waveland.com Copyright © 2005 by John Paul Shen and Mikko H. Lipasti 2013 reissued by Waveland Press, Inc. 10-digit ISBN 1-4786-0783-1 13-digit ISBN 978-1-4786-0783-0 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Table of Contents PrefaceAbout the Authors x ix 1 Processor Design 1 1.1 The Evolution of Microprocessors 2 1.21.2.1 Instruction Digital Set Systems Processor Design Design 44 1.2.2 Architecture,Realization Implementation, and 5 1.2.3 Instruction Set Architecture 6 1.2.4 Dynamic-Static Interface 8 1.3 Principles of Processor Performance 10 1.3.1 Processor Performance Equation 10 1.3.2 Processor Performance Optimizations 11 1.3.3 Performance Evaluation Method 13 1.4 Instruction-Level Parallel Processing 16 1.4.1 From Scalar to Superscalar 16 1.4.2 Limits of Instruction-Level Parallelism 24 1.51.4.3 Machines Summary for Instruction-Level
    [Show full text]
  • Multithreading
    CS 152 Computer Architecture and Engineering CS252 Graduate Computer Architecture Lecture 14 – Multithreading Krste Asanovic Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California at Berkeley http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~krste http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cs152 Last Time Lecture 13: VLIW § In a classic VLIW, compiler is responsible for avoiding all hazards -> simple hardware, complex compiler. § Later VLIWs added more dynamic hardware interlocks, which reduce relative hardware benefits § Use loop unrolling and software pipelining for loops, trace scheduling for more irregular code § Static scheduling difficult in presence of unpredictable branches and variable latency memory § VLIW has failed in general-purpose computing, but still used in deeply embedded processors and DSPs 2 Thread-Level Parallelism (TLP) § Difficult to continue to extract instruction-level parallelism (ILP) from a single sequential thread of control § Many workloads can make use of thread-level parallelism: – TLP from multiprogramming (run independent sequential jobs) – TLP from multithreaded applications (run one job faster using parallel threads) § Multithreading uses TLP to improve utilization of a single processor 3 Multithreading How can we guarantee no dependencies between instructions in a pipeline? One way is to interleave execution of instructions from different program threads on same pipeline Interleave 4 threads, T1-T4, on non-bypassed 5-stage pipe t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 T1:LD x1,0(x2) F D X M W Prior instruction in a T2:ADD x7,x1,x4
    [Show full text]
  • A VHDL Model of a Superscalar Implementation of the DLX Instruction Set Architcture
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses 10-1-1996 A VHDL model of a superscalar implementation of the DLX instruction set architcture Paul Ferno Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Ferno, Paul, "A VHDL model of a superscalar implementation of the DLX instruction set architcture" (1996). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A VHDL MODEL OF A SUPERSCALAR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DLX INSTRUCTION SET ARCHITECTURE by Paul A. Femo A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree of Masters ofScience in Computer Engineering Department ofComputer Engineering College ofEngineering Rochester Institute ofTechnology Rochester, New York October, 1996 Approvedby _ Dr. Kevin Shank, Assistant Professor Dr. Tony Chang, Professor Dr. Roy Czemikowski, Dept. Head and Professor THESIS RELEASE PERMISSION FORM ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Title: A VHDL Model ofa Superscalar Implementation ofthe DLX Instruction Set Architecture I, Paul A. Femo, hereby grant permission to the Wallace Memorial Library to reproduce my thesis in whole or part. Signature: _ Date: I(t-?£ ii Abstract The complexity of today's microprocessors demands that designers have an extensive knowledge of superscalar design techniques; this knowledge is difficult to acquire outside of a professional design team. Presently, there are a limited number of adequate resources available for the student, both in textual and model form.
    [Show full text]
  • Superscalar Processors and Parallel Computer Systems Objective
    Chapter 06: Instruction Pipelining and Parallel Processing Lesson 09: Superscalar Processors and Parallel Computer Systems Objective • To understand parallel pipelines and multiple execution units • Instruction level parallelism in superscalar processors Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Computer Architecture 2 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Indian Special Edition 2009 Multiple execution Units in Superscalar Processor Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Computer Architecture 3 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Indian Special Edition 2009 Superscalar Processor • Multiple execution units to execute instructions • Each execution unit reads its operands from and writes its results to a single, centralized register file Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Computer Architecture 4 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Indian Special Edition 2009 Multiple execution Units - Superscalar Processor • When an operation writes its result back to the register file, that result becomes visible to all of the execution units on the next cycle, allowing operations to execute on different units from the operations that generate their inputs Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Computer Architecture 5 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Indian Special Edition 2009 Instruction Issue Logic and Four execution units in a superscalar Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Computer Architecture 6 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. Indian Special Edition 2009 Instruction Level Parallelism (ILP) in Superscalar processors • Have complex bypassing hardware that forwards the results of each instruction to all of the execution units to reduce the delay between dependent instructions • The instructions that make up a program are handled in superscalar processors by the instruction issue logic, which issues instructions to the units in parallel Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Computer Architecture 7 Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Memory Data Flow, VLIW and EPIC Processors
    Advanced Computer Architectures 05 Superscalar techniques - Memory data flow, VLIW and EPIC processors Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Electrical Engineering Slides authors: Michal Štepanovský, update Pavel Píša B4M35PAP Advanced Computer Architectures 1 Superscalar Techniques… • The goal is to achieve a maximum throughput of instruction processing • Instruction processing can be analyzed as instructions flow or data flow, more precisely: • register data flow – data flow between processor registers • instruction flow through the pipeline Today’s lecture • memory data flow – to/from memory topic • It roughly matches to: • Arithmetic-logic (ALU) and other computational instructions (FP, bit- field, vector) processing • Branch instruction processing • Load/store instruction processing • maximizing the throughput of these three flows (or complete flow) correspond to the minimizing penalties and latencies of above three instructions types B4M35PAP Advanced Computer Architectures 2 Superscalar pipeline – see previous lesson Fetch Instruction / decode buffer Decode Dispatch buffer Dispatch Reservation stations Issue Execute Finish Reorder / Completion buffer Complete Store buffer Retire B4M35PAP Advanced Computer Architectures 3 What you know already from other subjects ... • Load / Store instructions are responsible for moving data between the memory and the processor's own registers • The processor has a very limited number of registers • The compiler generates a so-called spill code that temporarily saves data to memory/stack to make registers available - just by using the load/store instructions Significant latency of load/store instructions caused by: • Address generation – effective address computation • Address translation (see virtual memory) – TLB hit vs. TLB miss (is the page in memory × page fault, is the address in TLB × page-table walking) • Actual memory access – see next slide B4M35PAP Advanced Computer Architectures 4 Memory access • Load instruction: • Store data read from memory to rename register or reorder buffer.
    [Show full text]