Municipal Official President

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Municipal Official President WASHINGTONIAN 43 BY BENJAMIN WOFFORD PHOTOGRAPHS BY LEXEY SWALL THE MUNICIPAL OFFICIAL VERSUS THE PRESIDENT Two years ago, Karl Racine, the DC government’s top lawyer, was the little-known head of an obscure and relatively new office. Today he’s battling Facebook and suing Donald Trump—a case many serious lawyers think could fundamentally PHOTO CREDIT PHOTO CREDIT CREDIT PHOTO PHOTO damage this presidency. Who is this guy? And is his 42 WASHINGTONIAN ★ APRIL 2019 crusade actually good for the city that employs him? For many, it would be cosmic justice to see Trump taken down a peg by America’s only immigrant attorney general. counsel’s Russia probe looms like a thundering war- ship, Racine’s lawsuit may be the silent iceberg that delivers a fateful rupture to the Trump presidency. Amid all this, Racine has worked up a flurry of other high-profile causes, too. In December, he became the first prosecutor in the country to sue Facebook over the tech behemoth’s handling of private data. And within the past year, his office has led a nationwide coalition challenging the administration’s immigra- tion policies—including the denial of asylum seekers and the legality of sanctuary cities. In one ongoing case, Racine—an immigrant who came to America in 1965—has sued ICE himself. In less than five years, Racine has transformed a demure agency that defended the city from nuisance suits into one of the most prolific attorney-general offices in the country. “DC has always had a problem of not being treated with the same kind of seriousness nationally that it deserves,” says James Forman Jr., Talk to people in and Racine went viral after a professor at Yale Law School who teaches criminal around Racine’s office the President name- law. “Racine, I think, is changing that. He’s taken and you get the sense checked him at a March what’s a new office, in essence, and become a player there’s an endgame meeting of AGs. “I on the national stage.” to his high-profile feel like I know you,” lawsuits: statehood Trump said. “I feel like For a city that voted overwhelmingly against the for DC. I know you as well, Mr. President and must endure living in his shadow, it President,” Racine would be the sweetest kind of cosmic justice to see quipped. him taken down a notch by Karl Racine—America’s only immigrant attorney general, at that. Yet whatever the outcome, these cases have already helped Racine assemble an argument for a larger cause. Several DC politicians and outside lawyers say One pale evening in January, Karl Racine was ad- Then, abruptly, Racine let rip. Did anyone happen to House, at approximately the same moment his hotel the District AG’s office now rivals that of any state, and dressing a community auditorium and rapidly losing know that the AG’s office has sued or supported legal opened just down the street. Now Racine may soon that Racine has elevated the case for DC statehood, his grip on the room. Racine was roosted behind a efforts against the Trump administration, all told, 16 become known to Americans as the guy who sued under the precept of a simple theory: If you want to lectern, the 20 attendees mostly slouched in metal times? The phones plunged. “We’ve brought a case Trump, became one of the first people to thumb become a state, sue like one. Ochairs and half-zipped winter coats. Only two weeks together against Donald Trump regarding the emol- through his tax returns, and, it stands to reason, “There really are no more arguments left for why earlier, he had begun his second term as DC’s attor- uments clause.” Every face was now fixed on the six- altered the course of the 45th presidency. we shouldn’t have autonomy,” says Elizabeth Wilkins, ney general—an elected position that, five years ago, foot former point guard. “We allege that the President The emoluments suit, in which a pivotal ap- a former Supreme Court clerk who’s now senior was new on the ballot. Now he found himself mired is profiting from his office,” Racine explained, “in a peals-court ruling is expected this spring, alleges that counsel for policy in Racine’s office. “We look like a in a familiar dilemma: trying to explain exactly who manner that is completely and totally unprecedented.” Trump’s DC hotel and other holdings violate the Con- grownup now.” the hell he was. The move has become something of a favorite stitution’s little-known—and previously untested— Twenty minutes into his remarks, Racine was still parlor trick. “You saw that?” Racine asks me later. anti-corruption provision. “It’s historic,” says Brian WHEN DONALD TRUMP, A YEAR INTO HIS PRESIDENCY, parsing the complex jurisdictions of his office: The “Everybody’s like, What?!” Frosh, the attorney general of Maryland and Racine’s smeared refugees fleeing “shithole countries”—“Why AG is the District’s chief legal officer but also shares It also captures his grander ambitions in minia- co-counsel in the suit. “Nobody’s ever sued anyone, do we need more Haitians?” he reportedly asked a criminal caseload with the US Attorney’s Office— ture. Not very long ago, Racine was a public official let alone the President, over the emoluments clause.” aides—Racine took special offense. part lawyer for the mayor, part public prosecutor. with little name recognition managing a black sheep The case is notable not merely for its legal novelty, Racine was born in Haiti in 1962, shortly before The gazes of the attendees fell to their smartphones. of an office. Then Donald Trump won the White IMAGES MARTIN/AP JACQUELYN BY PHOTOGRAPH though. Several scholars believe that, while the special his parents fled the country’s blood-soaked Duvalier 44 WASHINGTONIAN ★ APRIL 2019 APRIL 2019 ★ WASHINGTONIAN 45 “I didn’t speak English. I remember feeling like I was literally placed on another planet.” regime. His father, the mayor of a small town, was in obvious danger—months earlier, a cousin had been rounded up and shot to death. His mother, a linguist, came to study at Howard and Georgetown. Racine and his elder sister were left behind, reuniting with their parents in America three years later. His moth- er, Racine says, “was not going to raise her kids in a country where we would have to choose either to remain silent or put our lives at risk.” He pauses, then smiles: “That’s ‘chain migration,’ as Trump would say.” Racine recounts the family history one afternoon in his Judiciary Square office, the clock tower of the Trump hotel visible from his corner-suite windows. As a child, he spent weekends with his mother and sister in Georgetown University’s library, whispering in Haitian Creole or French, while his father worked in retail, starting as a security guard at Sears. The family lived in Chevy Chase DC. “I knew I was an immigrant,” Racine says. “I didn’t speak English. I remember going to school and feeling like I was Racine (far right in literally placed on another planet.” Racine was both pictures) became At 56, Racine is the severe kind of good-looking: born in Haiti; a US citizen in 1992, his parents His impeccably kept, white-fringed hair encases two taking his oath at the DC emigrated so raptor eyes that turn up cheerfully at the corners. He courthouse at the start his mother of his law career. has the linguistic tendencies of an appellate lawyer; could study at in casual company, he drops words like “wherein” Georgetown. and “monies.” But silence is his most pronounced The family had mannerism—the stealthy bearing of a litigator lying against Princeton after being fouled by Craig Rob- glamorous DC public defender’s office, where he to investigate companies like Johnson & Johnson a bicultural in wait just to tell you, when you’re all finished, how inson, brother of future First Lady Michelle Obama. developed a reputation for representing juveniles. for allegedly misleading District consumers. The life, speaking you forgot to consider Rule 11. With his permanently (This is one episode Racine holds forth on in gar- He worked in the Office of White House Counsel office’s public-advocacy division, among other French and Creole at home in smiling eyes, the effect can be unsettling, like a Bond rulous detail: “Coach Weinhauer is like, ‘Get in the in the ’90s, representing President Clinton during things, pursues cases of economic justice, such as Northwest DC. villain delighted to realize you’re seated directly over game!’ Oh, shit . .” he says. “I was f---ing exhausted.”) the Lewinsky era. In 2006, he was named managing wage theft—only one of a handful of AG offices in the a trap door. He never, ever interrupts. Politics yielded little interest—until law school at partner of Venable, the first black person in the country to do so. By the time he became a citizen in 1992, his the University of Virginia, where he took immigration country to helm a law firm of that size. Meanwhile, on the criminal side, Racine quiet- parents had instilled what his sister, Mika, calls a law. On the weekends, he began driving into the coun- Back then, DC had not yet elected an attorney ly established the District as a leader in criminal- bicultural and global perspective: There were the tryside to work at a pro bono legal clinic for migrant general. Instead, the District employed what it called justice reform. The AG is responsible for prosecut- years of Sunday gatherings that the Racines hosted farmworkers.
Recommended publications
  • For Immediate Release News Release 2017-6 January 20, 2017
    DEPARTMENT OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DAVID Y. IGE GOVERNOR DOUGLAS S. CHIN ATTORNEY GENERAL For Immediate Release News Release 2017-6 January 20, 2017 ATTORNEY GENERAL DOUG CHIN VOICES OPPOSITION TO TWO PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATIONS HONOLULU – Attorney General Doug Chin has joined five other state Attorneys General opposing the nomination of Senator Jeff Sessions for United States Attorney General and has joined eight other state Attorneys General opposing the nomination of Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt to become Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The letter opposing Senator Sessions’ nomination to lead the United States Department of Justice notes, “The Justice Department seal reads ‘Qui Pro Domina Justitia Sequitur’: ‘Who prosecutes on behalf of justice.’ As state attorneys general—the chief law officers of our respective states—we regularly work with the U.S. Department of Justice. Senator Sessions has stood for policies antithetical to this core mission of the Justice Department. For these reasons, we believe him to be unqualified for the role of United States Attorney General. We join the thousands of individuals and organizations that have voiced their opposition to Senator Sessions’ appointment and respectfully urge you to reject his nomination.” The letter cites Senator Sessions’ refusal to protect racial minorities and vulnerable populations and his rejection of bipartisan criminal justice reforms. The letter opposing Attorney General Pruitt’s nomination to head the EPA says in part, “As the Attorney General of Oklahoma, Mr. Pruitt made it a priority to attack the rules— promulgated by EPA to implement Congressional mandates—that EPA is charged with enforcing.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Statement by Law Enforcement Leaders on Protecting Voters
    Joint Statement by Law Enforcement Leaders on Protecting Voters As law enforcement leaders, elected prosecutors, and chief legal officers of our jurisdictions, we know that the right to vote is fundamental to our democracy and our identity as Americans, regardless of political affiliation. It is a constitutional right and, ultimately, a public trust and safety issue. Public trust in democracy, the rule of law, and the integrity of our government is integral to public safety. When one system is attacked and fails, it compromises the ability of all systems to function, including our criminal justice system. And when communities do not trust us, we cannot effectively keep them safe. Efforts to interfere with the United States Postal Service imperil the democratic process and erode confidence in the integrity of all government systems. Within the context of a pandemic, we should already be deeply concerned that crowds at polling places will endanger our residents. And now, recent threats and intimidation tactics, including deploying law enforcement to police the polls, raises the prospect of voter intimidation, damaging bonds of trust between law enforcement and communities they serve. This is playing out at a time when the number of Americans expressing confidence in law enforcement has fallen to an all-time low. That is why, as leaders charged with protecting public safety, we call for free and fair elections and condemn efforts to interfere with the Postal Service and undermine the voting process. It is more important than ever that we protect the integrity of our democracy, and, in the era of COVID-19, the ability to vote by mail is essential to protecting our cherished democratic process.
    [Show full text]
  • Title Here – Option 1
    Post Election Briefing - State Attorneys General Stephen Cobb: Partner, Former Deputy Attorney General of Virginia Jim Schultz: Partner, Former Senior Associate White House Counsel, Former General Counsel to Pennsylvania Governor Bill Shepherd: Partner, Florida’s Former Statewide Prosecutor December 8, 2020 Copyright © 2020 Holland & Knight LLP. All Rights Reserved Thank you for joining today’s program • All participants are on mute • Please ask questions via Q&A box • Today’s program is being recorded and will be posted on our website • For technical assistance please reach out to the host via the chat box 2 Today’s Presenters Stephen Cobb Jim Schultz Bill Shepherd Partner Partner Partner Former Deputy Former Senior Associate Florida’s Former Attorney General White House Counsel, Statewide Prosecutor of Virginia Former General Counsel to Pennsylvania Governor 3 The Growing Role of State Attorneys General Looking Back on 2020 The Election Results 2021 – What to Expect 4 Priorities of State Attorneys General During 2020 • Consumer Protection • False Claims Act • Antitrust • Environmental Enforcement Actions • COVID-19 • Data Breach/Data Privacy 5 State Attorney General Race Results . Indiana . Pennsylvania . Todd Rokita (R) defeated Jonathan Weinzapfel (D) . Josh Shapiro* (D) defeated Heather Heidelbaugh (R) . Missouri . Utah . Eric Schmitt* (R) defeated Richard Finneran (D) . Sean D. Reyes* (R) defeated Greg Skordas (D) . Montana . Vermont . Austin Knudsen (R) defeated Ralph Graybill (D) vs. T.J. Donovan* (D) defeated H Brooke Paige (R) . North Carolina . Washington . Josh Stein* (D) defeated Jim O’Neill (R) . Bob Ferguson* (D) defeated Matt Larkin (R) . Oregon . West Virginia . Ellen Rosenblum* (D) defeated Michael Cross (R) . Patrick Morrisey* (R) defeated Sam Brown Petsonk (D) Aside from the 10 races detailed above, Maine’s next state legislature and the governors of New Hampshire, Puerto Rico, and American Samoa are due to appoint new AGs.
    [Show full text]
  • AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All Times EDT
    AG Alliance 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting Final Agenda * All times EDT THURSDAY 7/16: 11:30am – 2:30pm EDT (2 panels) • 11:30am – 12:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Impacts and Adaptations by Innovators and Industry, Consumer Warnings and State Government Oversight Roles (60 min) Moderator: Ellen Rosenblum, Attorney General, Oregon Attorney General’s Office o Lev Kubiak, Vice President and Deputy Chief Security Officer, Pfizer o Haley Schaffer, Senior Legal Counsel, 3M o Speaker TBD, Lowe’s Summary: Price gouging laws typically apply to prices of essential items needed in an emergency. Price gouging occurs when a seller increases the price of goods, services or commodities to a level much higher than is considered reasonable or fair. Hear how Attorneys General and industry continue working together to identify and stop this practice during the pandemic. The internet has driven a dramatic increase in the expansion of the counterfeit drug market. Learn about the low- risk/high-reward nature of this criminal industry, and how regulators are stepping up to combat it. • 1pm-2:30pm EDT: COVID-19 Price Gouging Issues (90 min) Moderator: William Tong, Attorney General, Connecticut o Clayton Friedman, Partner, Crowell & Moring LLP o Paul Singer, Senior Counsel for Public Protection, Texas AGO o Victoria Butler, Director, Consumer Protection Division, Florida AGO o Nicholas Trutanich, US Attorney, District of Nevada Summary: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Attorneys General have been on the watch for price gouging. As a result, several large companies have become subject to Attorney General investigations, and others have been named defendants in class action lawsuits brought by unhappy consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks to the National
    Administration of Donald J. Trump, 2019 Remarks to the National Association of Attorneys General March 4, 2019 The President. Thank you. Please. Thank you very much. I'm very honored to welcome our State Attorneys General back to the White House. We were together last year, and I said, "I'm inviting you back." And a lot things have been done, a lot of progress has been made. And, Vice President, thank you very much for being here. You were here last year, and we're here again, Mike. Tornadoes in Southeastern and Gulf Coast States Let me begin by saying our hearts go out to everyone affected by the devastating storms in Alabama, Georgia, and the surrounding States, and especially to the families of those who have tragically lost their lives. I've spoken with Governor Ivey, and we're working closely with officials throughout the region to get our communities back on their feet. Attorney General Marshall and General Carr, when you get home, please tell the people of the great States of Alabama and Georgia that America has their backs. We have a call in to Brian Kemp, and we have let them know and— the Governor and everybody—that we're with you a hundred percent. Thank you very much. A hundred percent, we'll be there. Thank you. National Association of Attorneys General I want to thank your National Association president, Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a friend of mine. We're also grateful to be joined by our fantastic new Attorney General, Bill Barr.
    [Show full text]
  • ATTORNEY GENERAL of WASHINGTON Administration Division PO Box 40100.Olympia WA 98504-0100 • (360) 753-6200
    ,y eo¢~F N GE~~r go~. ~ !~o~,~`_J X02 Bob Ferguson ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Administration Division PO Box 40100.Olympia WA 98504-0100 • (360) 753-6200 July 24, 2019 The Honorable Mick Mulvaney, Director Office of Management and Budget 725 17th St NW Washington, DC 20503 The Honorable Richard Theroux, Acting Deputy Administrator Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget 725 17th St NW Washington, DC 20503 Shannon Joyce Policy Analyst Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs Office of Management and Budget 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503 Dear Director Mulvaney, Acting Deputy Administrator Theroux, and Ms. Joyce: On behalf of the States of Washington, California, Delaware, Iowa, Illinois, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, the Commonwealths of Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Massachusetts, and the District of Columbia, and pursuant to Executive Order 12866, we respectfully request a meeting to discuss the public charge Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (RIN 1615-AA22) currently under your review. As the Attorneys General of states across the United States, we have significant concerns about the severe impact that this proposed rule would have on our states' residents. We will provide more detailed information in our meeting, which must be included in the administrative record for this rulemaking. We alert you now that the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS) entirely failed to estimate the true costs of its proposed rules to our states. The proposed rules would cause extensive injury to our states' economies and to millions of our states' residents. These injuries include the loss of health insurance, access to medical care, and state food and cash benefits.
    [Show full text]
  • FJP Letter 21St Century Prosecution Task Force
    August 17, 2021 President Joseph Biden The White House 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Washington, DC 20500 cc: Vice President Kamala Harris Attorney General Merrick B. Garland U.S. Department of Justice Ambassador Susan Rice Assistant to the President for Domestic Policy Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco U.S. Department of Justice Associate Attorney General Vanita Gupta U.S. Department of Justice Dear President Biden: We are a group of current and former elected prosecutors and Attorneys General, former federal criminal justice leaders, and past and present law enforcement leaders writing to urge the Biden-Harris Administration to convene a Presidential Task Force on 21st Century Prosecution before the year is out. The evidence is clear: our nation’s decades of “tough on crime” practices have not created safety and have been an anathema to justice. The United States detains 2.3 million people in prisons, jails, and confinement facilities, more than any other democratic nation. Racial, ethnic, and class disparities pervade the criminal legal system: American justice is far from equal. Our communities in turn bear an enormous human and fiscal toll. Countless families have been torn apart by over-policing and over-incarceration. Too many Americans are trapped in poverty and unable to contribute to their communities because of their criminal records. Many marginalized neighborhoods, particularly Black communities, face cycles of trauma, violence, and disinvestment, and are denied opportunities. Although state and local prosecutors work to protect their communities through targeted prosecution of serious crimes and offering services for survivors, survivors of crime still do not receive the care they deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Year End Report
    1 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2014 A Message from Craig Silliman Verizon is affected by a wide variety of government policies ‐‐ from telecommunications regulation to taxation to health care and more ‐‐ that have an enormous impact on the business climate in which we operate. We owe it to our shareowners, employees and customers to advocate public policies that will enable us to compete fairly and freely in the marketplace. Political contributions are one way we support the democratic electoral process and participate in the policy dialogue. Our employees have established political action committees at the federal level and in 18 states. These political action committees (PACs) allow employees to pool their resources to support candidates for office who generally support the public policies our employees advocate. This report lists all PAC contributions, corporate political contributions, support for ballot initiatives and independent expenditures made by Verizon during 2014. The contribution process is overseen by the Corporate Governance and Policy Committee of our Board of Directors, which receives a comprehensive report and briefing on these activities at least annually. We intend to update this voluntary disclosure twice a year and publish it on our corporate website. We believe this transparency with respect to our political spending is in keeping with our commitment to good corporate governance and a further sign of our responsiveness to the interests of our shareowners. Craig L. Silliman Executive Vice President, Public Policy and General Counsel 2 Verizon Political Contributions January – December 2014 Political Contributions Policy: Our Voice in the Political Process What are the Verizon Good Government Clubs? contributions process including the setting of The Verizon Good Government Clubs (GGCs) exist to monetary contribution limitations and the help the people of Verizon participate in America’s establishment of periodic reporting requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • GOVERNMENT of the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA Office of the Attorney General
    GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Office of the Attorney General ATTORNEY GENERAL KARL A. RACINE February 27, 2018 The Honorable Charles Allen Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary & Public Safety Council of the District of Columbia 1350 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Re: OAG Responses for FY 2016-2017 Performance Oversight Hearing – March 1, 2018 Dear Councilmember Allen: I am advised that on March 1, 2018, the Committee on the Judiciary & Public Safety will hold a performance oversight hearing on the Office of the Attorney General (OAG). In preparation for that hearing and in answer to the questions that your office transmitted to us on February 12, 2018, we submit the attached responses. Both a hard copy and an electronic version of the responses are being provided to your office. I appreciate the opportunity to work with you and the Committee. General Questions 1. Please provide a current organizational chart for the agency, including the number of vacant, frozen, and filled positions in each division or subdivision. Include the names and titles of all senior personnel, and note the date that the information was collected on the chart. RESPONSE: See Attachment 1. This is current as of January 18, 2018 to accord with the Schedule A provided in Attachment 2. a. Please provide an explanation of the roles and responsibilities of each division and subdivision. RESPONSE: Immediate Office of the Attorney General – provides overall supervision and guidance to all divisions within the office, pursues the public interest, and serves District residents through its communications and outreach programs. 1 Office of Consumer Protection – receives and mediates consumer complaints, investigates and takes enforcement actions under the Consumer Protection Procedures Act and other District and federal consumer laws, performs public outreach and education, and provides legislative support on issues that affect consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • AG Balderas Joins 20 Attorneys General Urging Congress to Swiftly Pass Clean Dream Act to Protect Dreamers
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Contact: Matt Baca December 18, 2017 (505) 270-7148 AG Balderas Joins 20 Attorneys General Urging Congress to Swiftly Pass Clean Dream Act to Protect Dreamers As Holiday Recess Approaches, 20 Attorneys General Urge Congress To Pass Clean DREAM Act; Stress Need To “Ensure That Dreamers Can Continue To Thrive Without Fear Of Deportation” WASHINGTON, D.C—As the holiday district work period for Congress approaches, Attorney General Balderas joined 19 other Attorneys General on the statement released below urging Congress to pass the Dream Act before adjourning. The statement reads: “As our states’ chief legal officers, we urge Congress to pass the Dream Act before adjourning for the holidays. Congress must act to address the status of the youth and young adults who were brought into our country as children and who now live, work and attend school in our communities. These “Dreamers” are law-abiding residents who have passed extensive background checks, are employed, pay taxes and volunteer in countless ways to enrich our states. They are parents, community leaders, homeowners, and founders of businesses.” “In addition to individuals who are currently losing their DACA status as Congress deliberates, come March, thousands of individuals will begin to lose their DACA protections daily.” “As fellow leaders entrusted by the voters to protect the health, safety and well-being of our states’ residents, we ask members of Congress to address this critically important matter without further delay, as you have repeatedly committed
    [Show full text]
  • SECOND LOOK at INJUSTICE for More Information, Contact: This Report Was Written by Nazgol Ghandnoosh, Ph.D., Senior Research Analyst at the Sentencing Project
    A SECOND LOOK AT INJUSTICE For more information, contact: This report was written by Nazgol Ghandnoosh, Ph.D., Senior Research Analyst at The Sentencing Project. Kevin Muhitch, Research Fellow, The Sentencing Project made substantial contributions and National Economic Research 1705 DeSales Street NW Associates, Inc., provided research assistance. 8th Floor Washington, D.C. 20036 Sections of this report benefited from the generous feedback of the following individuals: Hillary Blout, Crystal Carpenter, Kate Chatfield, (202) 628-0871 Sarah Comeau, Tara Libert, Rick Owen, Katerina Semyonova, Tyrone Walker, Laura Whitehorn, Steve Zeidman, and James Zeigler. sentencingproject.org endlifeimprisonment.org twitter.com/sentencingproj facebook.com/thesentencingproject instagram.com/endlifeimprisonment The Sentencing Project promotes effective and humane responses to crime that minimize imprisonment and criminalization of youth and adults by promoting racial, ethnic, economic, and gender justice. The Sentencing Project gratefully acknowledges Arnold Ventures for their generous support of our research on extreme sentences in the United States. Cover photo: William Underwood, criminal justice reform advocate and survivor of 33 years in prison, with his daughter Ebony Underwood, founder of We Got Us Now and a member of The Sentencing Project’s Board of Directors. Photography provided by Underwood Legacy Fund. Copyright © 2021 by The Sentencing Project. Reproduction of this document in full or in part, and in print or electronic format, only by permission of The Sentencing Project. 2 The Sentencing Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 4 I. Introduction 6 II. Why a Second Look? 9 Criminological Evidence 10 Racial Bias 13 Crime Survivors 14 Practical Concerns 15 III. Nationwide Reform Efforts 17 Second Look for All: California 18 Second Look for Emerging Adults: DC 22 Second Look for the Elderly: New York 29 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement by Which the Negotiation Class Would Be Bound
    Case: 1:17-md-02804-DAP Doc #: 1727 Filed: 06/24/19 1 of 7. PageID #: 51639 THE STATE OF TEXAS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL KEN PAXTON XAVIER BECERRA ATTORNEY GENERAL ATTORNEY GENERAL June 24, 2019 Honorable Dan Aaron Polster Carl B. Stokes United States Court House 801 West Superior Avenue, Courtroom 18B Cleveland, Ohio 44113-1837 [email protected] Cc: Helen Norton, Judicial Assistant [email protected] and Katherine King, Deputy Clerk [email protected] Via Electronic Mail RE: Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Certification of Rule 23(b)(3) Cities/Counties Negotiation Class, In Re: National Prescription Opiate Litigation, MDL No. 2804 Dear Judge Polster: The Attorneys General of California, Texas, Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Delaware, District of Columbia, Georgia, Guam, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Virginia having learned of the June 14, 2019 filing of Plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Certification of Rule 23(b)(3) Cities/Counties Negotiation Class, and having previously conferred with Plaintiffs’ counsel regarding concerns related to proposing a Negotiation Class, respectfully submit this letter to alert the Court to the unique perspective of Case: 1:17-md-02804-DAP Doc #: 1727 Filed: 06/24/19 2 of 7. PageID #: 51640 state Attorneys General on how the proposed certification may impact the interests of class members.1 Because the Attorneys General only received the initial filing on June 14, 2019 and corrected notice on June 17, 20192 and have had a very limited opportunity to review and analyze it, they urge the Court to postpone for at least three weeks its ruling regarding certification of the proposed Negotiation Class, to allow careful consideration of this unique and novel process.
    [Show full text]