Livelihood in Refugee Hosting Districts of Northern Uganda Understanding Land Dynamics and Livelihoods in Refugee Hosting Districts of Northern Uganda C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Livelihood in Refugee Hosting Districts of Northern Uganda Understanding Land Dynamics and Livelihoods in Refugee Hosting Districts of Northern Uganda C Understanding land dynamics and livelihoods in refugee hosting districts of Northern Uganda a Understanding Land Dynamics and Livelihood in Refugee Hosting Districts of Northern Uganda Understanding land dynamics and livelihoods in refugee hosting districts of Northern Uganda c ©Copyright 2018 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Plot 11, Yusuf Lule Road P.O. Box 7184, Kampala, Uganda Tel: +256 417112100 Understanding land dynamics and livelihoods in refugee hosting districts of Northern i Uganda Foreword While the rest of the world is still reluctant to fully for production is at sub-optimal level to assure integrate refugees, Uganda has, for several food self-sufficiency as well as a sustainable decades, recognized the need for a shift from livelihood. Considering the increased demand policies that kept refugees confined to camps. for land in the foreseeable future, guaranteeing Applauded as one of the most progressive in official land rights to host communities can be the world, Uganda’s refugee policy profoundly a viable assurance mechanism to facilitate commits to enabling refugees to pursue self- acquisition of land by Government as well as reliance and a dignified life while in exile, not only to enable ease of transactions between hosts out of compassion, but also to empower them and refugee communities. It will ensure trust to contribute to their new host communities, as and facilitate the envisaged productive use workers, tax-payers and as consumers. of land. Second, in addition to enhancing the optimal utilization of land for production through During the Solidarity Summit on Refugees held in improved technologies, there is an urgent need 2016, Uganda was recognised for its generosity to implement interventions that will diversify in hosting nearly 1.3 million refugees, at the time. livelihood options by involving the private The number has since increased to 1.4 million. sector through developing effective incentives The international community was called upon specifically targeting refugee hosting districts. to emulate the country’s generosity. Emulating Third, recognizing the opportunity presented Uganda’s approach is novel because in the due to the transformation of villages to small face of the daunting challenges of protracted rural towns due to the influx of refugees, it is displacement, waning humanitarian assistance, imperative to empower Local Governments in and the inclusivity of the 2030 Agenda, models refugee management, to not only guarantee that emphasise assisting refugees to “assist community cohesion, but also coherence in themselves’ must take center stage. local development and physical planning. Not least of all, the environment, if in grave danger, then people and the future are equally In addition to the myriad services that Ugandans endangered. We should galvanise efforts to extend to refugees, including education, revamp this natural capital, but also devise healthcare, water, security and protection, mechanisms for sustainably utilising it. refugees receive land for settlement and agricultural use to supplement relief support. While it is known that refugees receive land, I thank my staff for taking lead in the preparation information on modalities of access, use, of this report. I appreciate the unwavering productivity and community relations regarding support of the Office of the Prime Minister that this productive asset is still largely anecdotal. This guided preparation of this report, and the informed my decision to commission this report Economic Policy Research Centre that led the to contribute to the growing knowledge on research process. UNDP remains steadfast in refugee management in Uganda. I am glad that its commitment to support the Government the report addresses important aspects, while of Uganda and other actors in their quest elucidating the growing interconnectedness to mitigate risk and sustain the livelihoods of between refugees and their hosts, which I find vulnerable refugees and their host communities critical to sustaining co-existence. The report underscores several critical interventions to sustain Uganda’s progressive Rosa Malango model, which I implore policy makers and relevant development practitioners to consider critically in their programming. The findings of the report show that while land is used effectively UN Resident Coordinator & by refugees for settlements, the use of land UNDP Resident Representative Understanding land dynamics and livelihoods in refugee hosting districts of Northern Uganda ii Acknowledgment This report was commissioned and coordinated by The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Uganda, under the supervision of the UNDP’s Strategy and Policy Unit led by Yemesrach Workie (Economics Advisor) with Support from Tony Muhumuza, Simon Peter Nsereko, and Josephine Faith Nansubuga. It was prepared by the Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC) team comprised of Gemma Ahaibwe, Sheila Depio and Miriam Katunze. The Office of the Prime Minister including Hon. Gerald Menya (Commissioner for Refugees), Titus Jogo, Solomon Osan, Robert Baryamwesiga, David Wangwe, and Darlson Kusasira provided invaluable guidance during the preparation of the report. UNDP also appreciates support from participants of the consultative meetings including Francesca Akello (UNDP), Wilfred Bibanga (FAO), Francesca Cozzarini (UNDP), Mugero Jesse (Refugee Law Project), Wilson Kwamya (UNDP), Lucy Ndungu (UNDP), Lilian Otiego (UNHCR), and Ranya Sherif (UNHCR). Valuable insights were also given by Rose Twine (Eco Stove), Edoni Brahan Nasur (DanChurch Aid), Florence Ochola (UNDP) and Joan Teria (UNDP). The report benefited from wide ranging consultations held in Kampala and selected refugee hosting districts. Key informants were drawn from settlement commandants, Refugee Welfare Officers, Refugee Desk officers, Local Government officials, cultural leaders, clan heads and NGOs in the respective districts. We acknowledge the valuable inputs from members of Focused Group Discussions in the study districts that enriched the report. We duly acknowledge the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) for sharing the survey data that informed the analysis in this report. This report was edited by Stacy Andell, a UN Online Volunteer mobilized through www.onlinevolunteering.org Understanding land dynamics and livelihoods in refugee hosting districts of Northern iii Uganda Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................1 Land Access and Acquisition in Refugee-Hosting Communities ....................................2 Refugee Settlement and Physical Planning ...............................................................6 Land Use and Food Security ............................................7 Effect of Refugee Influx on the Environment ...............................................................11 Potential Threats to Uganda’s ‘Progressive’ Land Allocation Agenda ........................14 Way Forward ....................................................................16 Appendices ......................................................................17 Understanding land dynamics and livelihoods in refugee hosting districts of Northern Uganda 1 Introduction Establishing systems to protect and sustain the seekers from 0.15 million in December 2015 to livelihoods of refugees presents challenges at 1.4 million by January 2018iv; concerns on the the global, continental, regional and national optimal utilisation of allocated land to support levels. Given the changing landscape of food security and sustainable livelihood humanitarian response, host governments objectives; and management of community and development partners are beginning to expectations in return for hosting refugees. shift the philosophy of refugee assistance to 1 durable solutions for addressing humanitarian Focusing on Northern Uganda , this brief and development needs of refugees and their provides insights into land as the main host communities. In Uganda, this philosophy productive asset for building self-reliance. It started much earlier. The Government has, provides evidence on the access and utilisation since 2006, pursued a progressive approach of land considering the growing number of to refugee management backed by a refugees, also considering how the interplay conducive operational environment. First was of the local social, political and economic an inclusive Refugees Act of 2006 and Refugees context influences decisions on land. It also Regulations of 2010, which extended, among highlights the impact of land decisions on others, property rights, freedom of movement, household livelihoods and the environment the right to work, and access to services. and proposes options for optimising Uganda’s progressive refugee policy. Second, the National Development Plan (NDPII-2015/16-2019/20) articulates the Information was drawn from 12 focus group Refugee Settlement Transformative Agenda discussions (FGDs) and 16 key informant (STA) through which it seeks to foster sustainable interviews (KIIs) held in November 2017 among livelihoods through, in part, sustainable select host and refugee communities in management and efficient use of landi for Adjumani, Yumbe, Arua and Lamwo districts. refugees and host communities. For 2016/17 The districts were purposively selected to reflect alone, Uganda’s annual conservative cost the age of settlements, refugee population as of protection, management and provision of well as the social cultural diversity (ethnicity)
Recommended publications
  • Part of a Former Cattle Ranching Area, Land There Was Gazetted by the Ugandan Government for Use by Refugees in 1990
    NEW ISSUES IN REFUGEE RESEARCH Working Paper No. 32 UNHCR’s withdrawal from Kiryandongo: anatomy of a handover Tania Kaiser Consultant UNHCR CP 2500 CH-1211 Geneva 2 Switzerland e-mail: [email protected] October 2000 These working papers provide a means for UNHCR staff, consultants, interns and associates to publish the preliminary results of their research on refugee-related issues. The papers do not represent the official views of UNHCR. They are also available online at <http://www.unhcr.org/epau>. ISSN 1020-7473 Introduction The Kiryandongo settlement for Sudanese refugees is located in the north-eastern corner of Uganda’s Masindi district. Part of a former cattle ranching area, land there was gazetted by the Ugandan government for use by refugees in 1990. The first transfers of refugees took place shortly afterwards, and the settlement is now well established, with land divided into plots on which people have built houses and have cultivated crops on a small scale. Anthropological field research (towards a D.Phil. in anthropology, Oxford University) was conducted in the settlement from October 1996 to March 1997 and between June and November 1997. During the course of the fieldwork UNHCR was involved in a definitive process whereby it sought to “hand over” responsibility for the settlement at Kiryandongo to the Ugandan government, arguing that the refugees were approaching self-sufficiency and that it was time for them to be absorbed completely into local government structures. The Ugandan government was reluctant to accept this new role, and the refugees expressed their disbelief and feelings of betrayal at the move.
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Rapid Response Conflict-Related Displacement
    RESIDENT / HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR REPORT ON THE USE OF CERF FUNDS UGANDA RAPID RESPONSE CONFLICT-RELATED DISPLACEMENT RESIDENT/HUMANITARIAN COORDINATOR Ms. Ahunna Eziakonwa - Onochie REPORTING PROCESS AND CONSULTATION SUMMARY a. Please indicate when the After Action Review (AAR) was conducted and who participated. CERF agencies participated to review the achievements of the second CERF Rapid Response allocation of 2014 and the lessons learnt on 11 September 2015. The Lessons Learnt was then presented to the UNCT on 14 September 2015. The report was finalized based on UNCT feed-back. b. Please confirm that the Resident Coordinator and/or Humanitarian Coordinator (RC/HC) Report was discussed in the Humanitarian and/or UN Country Team and by cluster/sector coordinators as outlined in the guidelines. YES NO CERF agencies participated to review the achievements of the second CERF Rapid Response allocation of 2014 and the lessons learnt on 11 September 2015. The Lessons Learnt was then presented to the UNCT on 14 September 2015. The report was finalized based on UNCT feed-back. c. Was the final version of the RC/HC Report shared for review with in-country stakeholders as recommended in the guidelines (i.e. the CERF recipient agencies and their implementing partners, cluster/sector coordinators and members and relevant government counterparts)? YES NO The final CERF report was shared with the CERF recipient agencies. 2 I. HUMANITARIAN CONTEXT TABLE 1: EMERGENCY ALLOCATION OVERVIEW (US$) Total amount required for the humanitarian response:
    [Show full text]
  • MOYO DISTRICT Family Planning - Costed Implementation Plan 2018/19 - 2022/23
    REPUBLIC OF UGANDA MOYO DISTRICT Family Planning - Costed Implementation Plan 2018/19 - 2022/23 OCTOBER 2018 MOYO DISTRICT LOCAL GOVERNMENT This District Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan has been made possible with the technical support from the Ministry of Health and the United Nations Population Fund through Moyo District Health Office. This project was funded under the UNFPA Supplies Programme and UK aid from the UK government. Published by: Moyo District Local Government Ownership: Reproduction of this plan for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without permission from the Moyo District Local Government, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Preferred Citation: Moyo District (2018). District Family Planning Costed Implementation Plan, 2018/19-2022/23. Moyo, Uganda Copies available from: Moyo District Health Office iv Table of Contents List of Tables vi List of Figures vi FOREWORD vii PREFACE viii ACKNOWLEDGMENT ix ACRONYMS x EXECUTIVE SUMMARY xi SECTION ONE: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 2 1.1 Introduction 3 1.2 Background 3 1.3 SWOT Analysis for Family Planning Services 11 1.4 Process of Developing the District CIP 12 SECTION TWO: THE CASE FOR MOYO DISTRICT FP 13 COSTED IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 Demand Creation 14 2.3 Service Delivery and Access 15 2.4 Contraceptive Security 17 2.5 Policy and Enabling Environment 17 2.6 Financing 17 2.7 Stewardship, Management and Accountability 18 SECTION THREE: DISTRICT STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 19 3.1 Introduction 20 3.2 Vision, Mission, Core Values
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda on Road to Eliminate River Blindness
    8 NEW VISION,Tuesday, April 16, 2013 SPECIAL REPORT Uganda on road to eliminate river blindness PICTURES BY TADDEO BWAMBALE By TADDEO BWAMBALE Success story Studies carried out in 2006 showed Every morning, 70-year-old Fabiano that treatment twice a year and the Olur of Agwechi village in Nebbi killing of black flies could eliminate district sits by the door of his hut the disease within six to 10 years. with strands of sisal dangling from In 2007, against skepticism, his rough fingers. Uganda became the first African Weaving ropes became his sole country to introduce the measure source of livelihood ever since he on a large scale. The results was blinded by Onchocerciasis of Uganda’s approach, now (river blindness) eight years ago. dubbed a success story, show that “It started with bites from flies that transmission of the disease has always hovered around our garden been interrupted in six focus areas on the banks of River Namrwodho. out of the 18 existing ones. My body started itching and later, I These are Wadelai Focus in Nebbi lost my sight,” he narrates. district, Mt. Elgon Focus in Mbale, In 1993, Olur and over 600 people Sironko, Bududa and Manafwa in his village started swallowing districts. The others are Itwara Ivermectin (Mectizan) pills which Focus in Kabarole and Kyenjojo were supplied by the Ministry of districts, Mpamba-Nkusi Focus in Health. Kibaale district, Maracha-Terego “I don’t feel pain anymore, but Focus in Maracha district and I wish this drug could restore my Imaramagambo Focus in Bushenyi sight,” he says.
    [Show full text]
  • Rcdf Projects in Yumbe District, Uganda
    Rural Communications Development Fund (RCDF) RCDF PROJECTS IN YUMBE DISTRICT, UGANDA MAP O F YU M B E SH O W IN G S UB C O U NT IE S N Midigo Kei Apo R omo gi Yum be TC Kuru D rajani Od ravu 3 0 3 6 Km s UCC Support through the RCDF Programme Uganda Communications Commission Plot 42 -44, Spring road, Bugolobi P.O. Box 7376 Kampala, Uganda Tel: + 256 414 339000/ 312 339000 Fax: + 256 414 348832 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.ucc.co.ug 1 Table of Contents 1- Foreword……………………………………………………………….……….………..…..…....….…3 2- Background…………………………………….………………………..…………..….….……………4 3- Introduction………………….……………………………………..…….…………….….…………...4 4- Project profiles……………………………………………………………………….…..…….……...5 5- Stakeholders’ responsibilities………………………………………………….….…........…12 6- Contacts………………..…………………………………………….…………………..…….……….13 List of tables and maps 1- Table showing number of RCDF projects in Yumbe district………….………..….5 2- Map of Uganda showing Yumbe district………..………………….………...………….14 10- Map of Yumbe district showing sub counties………..……………………………….15 11- Table showing the population of Yumbe district by sub counties……..…...15 12- List of RCDF Projects in Yumbe district…………………………………….………...…16 Abbreviations/Acronyms UCC Uganda Communications Commission RCDF Rural Communications Development Fund USF Universal Service Fund MCT Multipurpose Community Tele-centre PPDA Public Procurement and Disposal Act of 2003 POP Internet Points of Presence ICT Information and Communications Technology UA Universal Access MoES Ministry of Education and Sports MoH Ministry of Health DHO District Health Officer CAO Chief Administrative Officer RDC Resident District Commissioner 2 1. Foreword ICTs are a key factor for socio-economic development. It is therefore vital that ICTs are made accessible to all people so as to make those people have an opportunity to contribute and benefit from the socio-economic development that ICTs create.
    [Show full text]
  • Education and Fragility in Northern Uganda CARE
    American Institutes for Research Academy for Educational Development Aga Khan Foundation Education and Fragility in Northern Uganda CARE Discovery Channel Global Education Fund Education Development Center Howard University International Reading Association The Joseph P. Kennedy, Jr. Foundation Produced by: Juárez and Associates, Inc. American Institutes for Research under the EQUIP1 LWA Michigan State University By: Meredith McCormac, Principal Author Judy A. Benjamin, PhD, Contributor Sesame Workshop October 2008 Save the Children Federation, USA University of Pittsburgh U.S. Agency for International Development World Education Cooperative Agreement No. GDG-A-00-03-00006-00 Districts Affected by Conflict Source: Allen and Schomerus (2006), originally obtained from UN OCHA Education and Fragility in Northern Uganda TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ...........................................................................................................2 1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................3 2.0 The Conflict and Root Causes of Fragility in Northern Uganda .................................4 2.1 Root Causes ............................................................................................................4 2.2 Historical Background ............................................................................................4
    [Show full text]
  • Moyo District
    National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles – Buliisa District National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles Moyo District April 2017 i National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles – Moyo District This report presents findings of National Population and Housing Census (NPHC) 2014 undertaken by the Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS). Additional information about the Census may be obtained from the UBOS Head Office, Statistics House. Plot 9 Colville Street, P. O. Box 7186, Kampala, Uganda; Telephone: +256-414 706000 Fax: +256-414 237553; E-mail: [email protected]; Website: www.ubos.org Cover Photos: Uganda Bureau of Statistics Recommended Citation Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2017, The National Population and Housing Census 2014 – Area Specific Profile Series, Kampala, Uganda. National Population and Housing Census 2014 Area Specific Profiles – Moyo District FOREWORD Demographic and socio-economic data are useful for planning and evidence-based decision making in any country. Such data are collected through Population Censuses, Demographic and Socio-economic Surveys, Civil Registration Systems and other Administrative sources. In Uganda, however, the Population and Housing Census remains the main source of demographic data, especially at the sub-national level. Population Census taking in Uganda dates back to 1911 and since then the country has undertaken five such Censuses. The most recent, the National Population and Housing Census 2014, was undertaken under the theme ‘Counting for Planning and Improved Service Delivery’. The enumeration for the 2014 Census was conducted in August/September 2014. The Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) worked closely with different Government Ministries, Departments and Agencies (MDAs) as well as Local Governments (LGs) to undertake the census exercise.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING PLAN Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development Rural Electrification Agency ENERGY FOR RURAL TRANSFORMATION PHASE III GRID INTENSIFICATION SCHEMES PACKAGED UNDER WEST NILE, NORTH NORTH WEST, AND NORTHERN SERVICE TERRITORIES Public Disclosure Authorized JUNE, 2019 i LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CDO Community Development Officer CFP Chance Finds Procedure DEO District Environment Officer ESMP Environmental and Social Management and Monitoring Plan ESMF Environmental Social Management Framework ERT III Energy for Rural Transformation (Phase 3) EHS Environmental Health and Safety EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ESMMP Environmental and Social Mitigation and Management Plan GPS Global Positioning System GRM Grievance Redress Mechanism MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development NEMA National Environment Management Authority OPD Out Patient Department OSH Occupational Safety and Health PCR Physical Cultural Resources PCU Project Coordination Unit PPE Personal Protective Equipment REA Rural Electrification Agency RoW Right of Way UEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited WENRECO West Nile Rural Electrification Company ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ......................................................... ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................ iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Country Operations Plan
    COUNTRY OPERATIONS PLAN Country: Uganda Planning Year: 2004 2004 Country Operations Plan – Uganda __________________________________________________________________________________________ Part I: Executive - Summary 1.1 Context and Beneficiary Populations UNHCR’s presence in Uganda dates back from the 1960s. Though the earlier arrivals of Rwandan refugees had returned in 1994, the country still hosts 18,500 Rwandans who are residual caseloads of the 1996 repatriation from Tanzania. There are some 5,000 Rwandans who entered Mbarara district of Uganda from Tanzania when the Rwandan refugees were being repatriated from there in 2002. The Government of Uganda has not yet decided their status. The majority of the refugees in the country today are Southern Sudanese hosted in northern Uganda and who number about 172,300 (86%) of the total refugee population of 200,800 as of 28 February 2003. About 8,500 Congolese refugees hosted in the Southwest are from the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). There are other smaller groups from Somalia, Ethiopia and Kenya that are also being assisted. Sudanese and Congolese refugees are granted status on a prima facie basis, while the status of others is ascertained through individual refugee status determination. Almost all the refugees fled their respective countries of origin because of the civil war and fear of persecution caused by ethnic rivalries and political differences. The Government of Uganda, continues to host refugees from the neighbouring countries. Refugees who are in designated settlememnts are provided with agricultural lands, tools and seeds with the objective of making them self-sufficient. As a result, refugees in the northern settlements have managed to produce a certain percentage of their food requirements, thereby reducing dependence on the food assistance from WFP.
    [Show full text]
  • Usaid's Malaria Action Program for Districts
    USAID’S MALARIA ACTION PROGRAM FOR DISTRICTS GENDER ANALYSIS MAY 2017 Contract No.: AID-617-C-160001 June 2017 USAID’s Malaria Action Program for Districts Gender Analysis i USAID’S MALARIA ACTION PROGRAM FOR DISTRICTS Gender Analysis May 2017 Contract No.: AID-617-C-160001 Submitted to: United States Agency for International Development June 2017 USAID’s Malaria Action Program for Districts Gender Analysis ii DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) or the United States Government. June 2017 USAID’s Malaria Action Program for Districts Gender Analysis iii Table of Contents ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................... VIII 1. INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................1 2. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................1 COUNTRY CONTEXT ...................................................................................................................3 USAID’S MALARIA ACTION PROGRAM FOR DISTRICTS .................................................................6 STUDY DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub Region (Uganda)
    Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub region April 2015 Integrated Seed Sector Development Programme Uganda Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub-region Integrated Seed Sector Development Programme In Uganda Recommended referencing: ISSD Uganda, 2015. Seed System Security Assessment in West Nile Sub-region. Integrated Seed Sector Development Programme in Uganda, Wageningen UR Uganda. Kampala Participating partners: FAO (Nairobi), Danish Refugee Council, ZOA, NilePro Trust Limited and Local Governments of Arua, Koboko, Adjumani and Moyo District TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS.............................................................................................. i ACKOWLEDGEMENT ........................................................................................... ii THE ASSESSMENT TEAM ..................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................... iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................... 1 1.1 BACKGROUND TO THE SEED SECURITY ASSESSMENT ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 ASSESSMENT OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 Ehealth MONTHLY BULLETIN
    WHO UGANDA BULLETIN February 2016 eHEALTH MONTHLY BULLETIN Welcome to this 1st issue of the eHealth Bulletin, a production 2015 of the WHO Country Office. Disease October November December This monthly bulletin is intended to bridge the gap between the Cholera existing weekly and quarterly bulletins; focus on a one or two disease/event that featured prominently in a given month; pro- Typhoid fever mote data utilization and information sharing. Malaria This issue focuses on cholera, typhoid and malaria during the Source: Health Facility Outpatient Monthly Reports, Month of December 2015. Completeness of monthly reporting DHIS2, MoH for December 2015 was above 90% across all the four regions. Typhoid fever Distribution of Typhoid Fever During the month of December 2015, typhoid cases were reported by nearly all districts. Central region reported the highest number, with Kampala, Wakiso, Mubende and Luweero contributing to the bulk of these numbers. In the north, high numbers were reported by Gulu, Arua and Koti- do. Cholera Outbreaks of cholera were also reported by several districts, across the country. 1 Visit our website www.whouganda.org and follow us on World Health Organization, Uganda @WHOUganda WHO UGANDA eHEALTH BULLETIN February 2016 Typhoid District Cholera Kisoro District 12 Fever Kitgum District 4 169 Abim District 43 Koboko District 26 Adjumani District 5 Kole District Agago District 26 85 Kotido District 347 Alebtong District 1 Kumi District 6 502 Amolatar District 58 Kween District 45 Amudat District 11 Kyankwanzi District
    [Show full text]