Geology Bibliography of California, 1854–2000

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology Bibliography of California, 1854–2000 California State University, Monterey Bay Digital Commons @ CSUMB Miscellaneous Monterey and San Luis Obispo Salinas River and Carmel River Groundwater County Documents and Reports Basins 12-21-2018 2000 - Geology Bibliography of California, 1854–2000 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_5 Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, Business Commons, Education Commons, Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation "2000 - Geology Bibliography of California, 1854–2000" (2018). Miscellaneous Monterey and San Luis Obispo County Documents and Reports. 38. https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/hornbeck_cgb_5/38 This Document is brought to you for free and open access by the Salinas River and Carmel River Groundwater Basins at Digital Commons @ CSUMB. It has been accepted for inclusion in Miscellaneous Monterey and San Luis Obispo County Documents and Reports by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ CSUMB. For more information, please contact [email protected]. GEOLOGY BIBLIOGRAPHY OF MONTEREY COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 1854–2000 Version 1.0 PREPARED FOR THE MONTEREY COUNTY 21ST CENTURY GENERAL PLAN UPDATE PROGRAM Submitted to: County of Monterey Environmental Resource Policy Department 240 Church Street, Room 301 Salinas, California 93902 Compiled by: Lew Rosenberg, Consulting Geologist Calif. License EG–1777 P.O. Box 183 Templeton, California 93465 August 2000 Geology Bibliography of Monterey County August 2000 Version 1.0 Introduction and Data Sources: One of the goals of the County of Monterey’s 21st Century General Plan Update is to have the most complete data available for planning and policy decisions. In support of this goal, the following list of approximately 4,300 references was compiled from a variety of sources. The scope of this database is much broader in scope than the original list of consultant reports submitted to Monterey County governmental agencies and includes extensive references on regional geologic mapping, hydrogeology, economic geology, and research done in connection with the Parkfield Earthquake Prediction Experiment. Major sources of information include: • Monterey County Planning Department: a database of approximately 2,000 references within the categories of geology, soil, water resources, and water quality. • Monterey County Water Resources Agency. • Monterey Peninsula Water Management District. • The American Geological Institute’s GeoRef database. • The U.S. Geological Survey’s National Geologic Map Database. • An online bibliography of research conducted in the northern Santa Lucia Mountains, Big Sur, and surrounding area published for the Santa Lucia Natural History Symposium (sponsored by Esalen Institute and University of California Big Creek Reserve, 1994–1997). • Library catalogs of the U.S. Geological Survey, University of California, California State University, Stanford University, and the California Institute of Technology. Methods and Limitations: References from the various data sources were compiled into a master list. Most duplicate entries in the list were culled and the remaining entries were edited for consistency. However, less than one-quarter of the original documents referenced were actually reviewed. Therefore, many of the referenced citations are incomplete, especially unpublished reports from the Monterey County Planning Department and should be regarded as provisional. Much of the material in the bibliography is “gray” literature, which is unpublished and not always readily available. Nevertheless, the database should be useful for planners, geologists, and the public. This bibliography exists in three formats: (1) a printed copy, (2) a digital version in PDF format, and (3) a digital database in Microsoft Access 2000 format. The PDF version is searchable by keyword using software such as Adobe Acrobat Reader (available at no cost from Adobe, Inc. on the Internet at www.adobe.com). The database contains additional fields such as Monterey County Planning Department file numbers and is intended mainly for the Monterey County Planning Department. This bibliography may be freely reproduced, but not sold without written permission from the County of Monterey. Requests for copies of the bibliography should be directed to: County of Monterey Environmental Resource Policy Department 240 Church Street, Room 301 Salinas, California 93902 The data for this is current as of April 2000 and is denoted as Version 1.0. Future minor revisions will be denoted by the increase of the numeral after the decimal, while large changes will be denoted by increasing the numeral before the decimal. A list of the revisions will be included with the updated bibliography. - i - Geology Bibliography of Monterey County August 2000 Version 1.0 A ABA Consultants, 1986, Elkhorn Slough Wetlands Management Plan—preliminary draft report, water quality, sedimentation and erosion ABA Consultants and Haro, Kasunich & Assoc, 1992, Proposed Moss Landing Marine Laboratories Adams, E.W., and Beatty, W.B., 1962, Bituminous rocks in California: Mineral Information Service, v. 15, no. 4, p. 1–9. Addicott, W.O., 1968, Mid-Tertiary zoogeographic and paleogeographic discontinuities across the San Andreas fault, California, in Dickinson, W.R., and Grantz, Arthur, eds., Proceedings of conference on geologic problems of the San Andreas fault system: Stanford University Publications in Geological Sciences, v. 11, p. 144–165. Addicott, W.O., 1974, Giant pectinids of the eastern north Pacific margin: Significance in Neogene zoogeography and chronostratigraphy: Journal of Paleontology, v. 48, no. 1, p. 180–194. Addicott, W.O., 1978, Marine paleogeography and paleontology of the Salinas Basin during the latest part of the Miocene with notes on macrofossils from near San Lucas, California, in Addicott, W.O., ed., Neogene biostratigraphy of selected areas in the California Coast Ranges: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78–446, p. 83–90. Addicott, W.O., 1978, Notes on the geology of Point Lobos State Reserve, Monterey County, California, in Addicott, W.O., ed., Neogene biostratigraphy of selected areas in the California Coast Ranges: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 78–446, p. 91–96. Addicott, W.O., 1979, Oligocene molluscan biostratigraphy of the Indians, Santa Lucia Range, central California, in Graham, S.A., ed., Tertiary and Quaternary geology of the Salinas Valley and Santa Lucia Range, Monterey County, California: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists, Pacific Section, Pacific Coast Paleogeography Field Guide 4, p. 45–49. Addicott, W.O., and Galehouse, J.S, 1973, Pliocene marine fossils in the Paso Robles Formation, California: U.S. Geological Survey Journal of Research, v. 1, no. 5, p. 509–514. Agnew, D.C., and Sieh, K.E, 1978, A documentary study of the felt effects of the great California earthquake of 1857: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 68, no. 6, p. 1717–1729. Aitken, B.G., 1979, Stability relations of Ca-rich scapolite: Stanford, Calif., Stanford University, Ph.D. dissertation, 121 p. Akers, J.P., 1967, The geohydrology of Pinnacles National Monument, California: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 67–2, 13 p. Aki, Keiiti, 1967, Scaling law of seismic spectrum: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 72, no. 4, p. 1217–1231. Aki, Keiiti, 1968, Seismic displacements near a fault: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 73, no. 16, p. 5359–5376. Aki, Keiiti, 1968, Source mechanism of the Parkfield earthquake [abs.], in Dickinson, W.R., and Grantz, Arthur, eds., Proceedings of conference on geologic problems of the San Andreas fault system: Stanford University Publications in Geological Sciences, v. 11, p. 83. - 1 - Geology Bibliography of Monterey County August 2000 Version 1.0 Aki, Keiiti, 1969, Analysis of the seismic coda of local earthquakes as scattered waves: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 74, no. 2, p. 615–631. Aki, Keiiti, 1979, Characterization of barriers on an earthquake fault: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 84, no. B11, p. 6140–6148. Albers, J.P., and Fraticelli, L.A., 1984, Preliminary mineral resources assessment map of California: U.S. Geological Survey Mineral Investigations Resource Map MR-88, scale 1:1,000,000. Alexander, C.S., 1953, The marine and stream terraces of the Capitola-Watsonville area: University of California Publications in Geography, v. 10, no. 1, 44 p. Algermissen, S.T., Harding, S.T., 1967, Note on the focal mechanism of the Parkfield, California earthquake of June 28, 1966: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 57, no. 6, p. 1131– 1141. Allen, C.R, and Smith, S.W., 1966, Pre-earthquake and post-earthquake surficial displacements, in Parkfield earthquakes of June 27–29, 1966, Monterey and San Luis Obispo Counties, California— preliminary report: Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, v. 56, no. 4, p. 966–967. Allen, J.E., 1945, Geology of the San Juan Bautista quadrangle, California: Berkeley, University of California, Ph.D. dissertation. Allen, J.E., 1946, Geology of the San Juan Bautista quadrangle, California: California Division of Mines Bulletin 133, 75 p., 3 sheets, scale 1:62,500. Allen, J.E., 1946, Geology of the San Juan Bautista quadrangle, California: California Division of Mines Bulletin 133, 75 p., 3 sheets, scale 1:62,500. Almgren, A.A., and Reay, W.G., 1977, Late Cretaceous foraminifera from the Coast Ranges of central California, in Howell, D.G., Vedder,
Recommended publications
  • Draft 2019 Superintendent's Compendium Version 1
    National Park Service Golden Gate National Recreation Area U.S. Department of the Interior Fort Mason Building 201 San Francisco, California 94123 (415) 561-4720 phone (415) 561-4710 fax DRAFT - DRAFT - DRAFT 2019 Superintendent’s Compendium Of Designations, Closures, Permit Requirements and Other Restrictions Imposed Under Discretionary Authority Approved: ____________________ ______________ Laura E. Joss Date General Superintendent Golden Gate National Recreation Area In accordance with the regulations and delegated authority provided in Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Chapter 1, Parts 1 through 7, authorized by Title 54, United States Code, Section 100751(a), the following regulatory provisions are established for the proper management and protection of all lands and waters administered by the National Park Service within the Golden Gate National Recreation Area south of the Bolinas-Fairfax Road, including Muir Woods National Monument and Fort Point National Historic Site. Unless otherwise stated, these regulatory provisions apply in addition to the requirements contained in 36 CFR, Chapter 1, Parts 1-6, and Sections 7.6 and 7.97 in Part 7. Written determinations that explain the reasoning behind the Superintendent’s use of discretionary authority as required by Section 1.5 (c) appear in this document identified by italicized print. The Compendium and its exhibits are available on the Golden Gate National Recreation Area’s (GGNRA or Park) website. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 – GENERAL PROVISIONS 3 Section 1.1 Definitions 3 Section
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur for Other Uses, See Big Sur (Disambiguation)
    www.caseylucius.com [email protected] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page Big Sur For other uses, see Big Sur (disambiguation). Big Sur is a lightly populated region of the Central Coast of California where the Santa Lucia Mountains rise abruptly from the Pacific Ocean. Although it has no specific boundaries, many definitions of the area include the 90 miles (140 km) of coastline from the Carmel River in Monterey County south to the San Carpoforo Creek in San Luis Obispo County,[1][2] and extend about 20 miles (30 km) inland to the eastern foothills of the Santa Lucias. Other sources limit the eastern border to the coastal flanks of these mountains, only 3 to 12 miles (5 to 19 km) inland. Another practical definition of the region is the segment of California State Route 1 from Carmel south to San Simeon. The northern end of Big Sur is about 120 miles (190 km) south of San Francisco, and the southern end is approximately 245 miles (394 km) northwest of Los Angeles. The name "Big Sur" is derived from the original Spanish-language "el sur grande", meaning "the big south", or from "el país grande del sur", "the big country of the south". This name refers to its location south of the city of Monterey.[3] The terrain offers stunning views, making Big Sur a popular tourist destination. Big Sur's Cone Peak is the highest coastal mountain in the contiguous 48 states, ascending nearly a mile (5,155 feet/1571 m) above sea level, only 3 miles (5 km) from the ocean.[4] The name Big Sur can also specifically refer to any of the small settlements in the region, including Posts, Lucia and Gorda; mail sent to most areas within the region must be addressed "Big Sur".[5] It also holds thousands of marathons each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Nacimiento Dam Operation Policy
    Nacimiento Dam Operation Policy Monterey County Water Resources Agency Adopted by the Board of Directors February 20, 2018 Recommended by the Reservoir Operations Advisory Committee November 30, 2017 Contents Contents Section I – Introduction and Background ................................................................................ 1 General Description / Information ............................................................................................. 2 Nacimiento River ..................................................................................................................... 2 Nacimiento Dam ..................................................................................................................... 3 Nacimiento Hydroelectric Plant .............................................................................................. 3 Nacimiento Water Project (NWP) ........................................................................................... 4 Pertinent Nacimiento Reservoir Elevations ............................................................................ 4 Section II – Governance and Water Rights .............................................................................. 7 Monterey County Water Resources Agency Board of Supervisors ............................................ 7 Monterey County Water Resources Agency Board of Directors ................................................ 7 Reservoir Operations Advisory Committee ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1 ONE Official Record of Adoption................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000............................................................ 1-1 1.2 Adoption By Local Governing Bodies and Supporting Documentation ..................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2 TWO Plan Description...................................................................................................................2-1 Section 3 THREE Community Description......................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Location, Geography, and History ........................................................ 3-1 3.2 Demographics ...................................................................................... 3-1 3.3 Land Use and Development Trends ...................................................... 3-2 3.4 Incorporated Communities.................................................................... 3-2 Section 4 FOUR Planning Process.................................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Overview of Planning Process .............................................................. 4-1 4.2 Hazard Mitigation Planning Team........................................................ 4-2 4.2.1 Formation of the Planning Team............................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Planning Team
    [Show full text]
  • Must Road Trips
    Must PHOTO COURTESY OF SEEMONTERY.COM OF COURTESY PHOTO Bixby Creek Bridge Monterey LoveRoad Trips Carmel-by-the-Sea Our writer’s romantic getaway gone Big Sur wrong leads to a revelation along Pfeiffer Beach California’s Highway 1. McWay Falls By Alan Rider Lucia Gorda Ragged Point McWay Falls in Monterey County is visible from COURTESY OF SEEMONTEREY.COM California’s Highway 1. San Simeon Cambria hey say that the road to true love is filled with in hand and weather forecasts promising sunny skies and pull over somewhere safe if you want to snap pics), and on ups and downs. Here’s proof that that’s no mere balmy temperatures, I had no choice but to go on one of to Andrew Molera State Park. There, I met up with the folks aphorism. the world’s most romantic road trips solo (sad face). from the Ventana Wildlife Society for a four-hour excursion TYou see, my most recent romantic interest—let’s call Pulling out of the parking lot of the oceanfront Sanctuary to locate endangered California condors in the wild. Using her Wendy because that’s her name—and I were brought Beach Resort in Monterey that first morning, I found running a radio-tracking antenna and a spotting scope, our guide together by our mutual love of road trips. Her online dating the Miata RF’s six-speed manual through the gears to be gave us a rare look at these gigantic birds that are slowly but profile made clear she was thoroughly into them, and I’m surprisingly therapeutic.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Accomplishments in the Big Sur Coast Area
    CCC Hearing Item: Th 13.3 February 9, 2012 _______________________________________________________________ California Coastal Commission’s 40th Anniversary Report Coastal Management in Big Sur History and Accomplishments Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR Gorda NORTHERN BIG SUR CENTRAL BIG SUR SOUTHERN BIG SUR Gorda “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, southbound, north of Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Cape San Martin, Big Sur Coast. CCRP#1649 9/2/2002 “A Highway Runs Through It” Heading south on Highway One. “A Highway Runs Through It” Southbound Highway One, near Partington Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, south of Mill Creek. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Historic Big Creek Bridge, at entrance to U.C. Big Creek Reserve. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, looking south to the coastal terrace at Pacific Valley. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 “A Highway Runs Through It” Highway One, at Monterey County line, looking south into San Luis Obispo County, with Ragged Point and Piedras Blancas in far distance (on the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 NORTHERN BIG SUR “Grand Entrance View” (from the north) of the Big Sur Coast, looking southwards to Soberanes Point, with Point Sur in the distance (on the horizon to the right). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Garrapata State Park/Beach, looking north to Soberanes Point. ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Mouth of Garrapata Creek (from Highway One). ©Kelly Cuffe 2012 Sign for Rocky Point Restaurant, with Notley’s Landing and Rocky Creek Bridge in distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • Strategic Community Fuelbreak Improvement Project Final Environmental Impact Statement
    Final Environmental United States Department of Impact Statement Agriculture Forest Service Strategic Community Fuelbreak May 2018 Improvement Project Monterey Ranger District, Los Padres National Forest, Monterey County, California In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Bigbig Sursur
    CalCal PolyPoly -- PomonaPomona GeologyGeology ClubClub SpringSpring 20032003 FFieldield TTriprip BigBig SurSur David R. Jessey Randal E. Burns Leianna L. Michalka Danielle M. Wall ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The authors of this field guide would like to express their appreciation and sincere thanks to the Peninsula Geologic Society, the California Geological Survey and Caltrans. Without their excellent publications this guide would not have been possible. We apologize for any errors made through exclusion or addition of trip field stops. For more detailed descriptions please see the following: Zatkin, Robert (ed.), 2000, Salinia/Nacimiento Amalgamated Terrane Big Sur Coast, Central California, Peninsula Geological Society Spring Field Trip 2000 Guidebook, 214 p. Wills, C.J., Manson, M.W., Brown, K.D., Davenport, C.W. and Domrose, C.J., 2001, LANDSLIDES IN THE HIGHWAY 1 CORRIDOR: GEOLOGY AND SLOPE STABILITY ALONG THE BIG SUR COAST, California Department of Conservation Division of Mines & Geology, 43 p. 0 122 0 00' 122 0 45' 121 30 Qal Peninsula Geological Society Qal G a b i Qt la Field Trip to Salina/Nacimento 1 n R S a A n L Big Sur Coast, Central California I g N qd A e S R Qt IV E Salinas R S a lin a s Qs V Qal 101 a Qs Monterey Qc lle Qt Qp y pgm Tm Qm Seaside pgm EXPLANATION Qt Chualar Qp Qt UNCONSOLIDATED Tm pgm SEDIMENTS Qp Carmel Qal sur Qs Qal Alluvium qd CARMEL RIVER Tm Qal Point sur Qs Dune Sand Tm Lobos pgm 0 S 0 36 30 ie ' r 36 30' pgm ra Qt Quaternary non-marine d CARMEL e S terrace deposits VALLEY a Qal lin a Qt Pleistocene non-marine Tm pgm s Qc 1 Tm Tula qd rcit Qp Plio-Pleistocene non-marine qd os F ault Qm Pleistocene marine Terrace sur sur deposits qd Tm COVER ROCKS pgm qd Tm Monterey Formation, mostly qm pgm qm pgm marine biogenic and sur pgm clastic sediments middle to qdp sur qd late Miocene in age.
    [Show full text]
  • Monterey County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of Monterey County Salinas River The Salinas River consists of more than 75 stream miles and drains a watershed of about 4,780 square miles. The river flows northwest from headwaters on the north side of Garcia Mountain to its mouth near the town of Marina. A stone and concrete dam is located about 8.5 miles downstream from the Salinas Dam. It is approximately 14 feet high and is considered a total passage barrier (Hill pers. comm.). The dam forming Santa Margarita Lake is located at stream mile 154 and was constructed in 1941. The Salinas Dam is operated under an agreement requiring that a “live stream” be maintained in the Salinas River from the dam continuously to the confluence of the Salinas and Nacimiento rivers. When a “live stream” cannot be maintained, operators are to release the amount of the reservoir inflow. At times, there is insufficient inflow to ensure a “live stream” to the Nacimiento River (Biskner and Gallagher 1995). In addition, two of the three largest tributaries of the Salinas River have large water storage projects. Releases are made from both the San Antonio and Nacimiento reservoirs that contribute to flows in the Salinas River. Operations are described in an appendix to a 2001 EIR: “ During periods when…natural flow in the Salinas River reaches the north end of the valley, releases are cut back to minimum levels to maximize storage. Minimum releases of 25 cfs are required by agreement with CDFG and flows generally range from 25-25[sic] cfs during the minimum release phase of operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Sur Sustainable Tourism Destination Stewardship Plan
    Big Sur Sustainable Tourism Destination Stewardship Plan DRAFT FOR REVIEW ONLY June 2020 Prepared by: Beyond Green Travel Table of Contents Acknowledgements............................................................................................. 3 Abbreviations ..................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ............................................................................................. 5 About Beyond Green Travel ................................................................................ 9 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 10 Vision and Methodology ................................................................................... 16 History of Tourism in Big Sur ............................................................................. 18 Big Sur Plans: A Legacy to Build On ................................................................... 25 Big Sur Stakeholder Concerns and Survey Results .............................................. 37 The Path Forward: DSP Recommendations ....................................................... 46 Funding the Recommendations ........................................................................ 48 Highway 1 Visitor Traffic Management .............................................................. 56 Rethinking the Big Sur Visitor Attraction Experience ......................................... 59 Where are the Restrooms?
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources of the Del Monte Forest Special-Status Species
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES OF THE DEL MONTE FOREST SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES DEL MONTE FOREST PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN Prepared for: Pebble Beach Company Post Office Box 1767 Pebble Beach, California 93953-1767 Contact: Mark Stilwell (831) 625-8497 Prepared by: Zander Associates 150 Ford Way, Suite 101 Novato, California 94945 Contact: Michael Zander (415) 897-8781 Zander Associates TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables and Plates 1.0 Introduction................................................................................................................1 2.0 Overview of Special-Status Species in the DMF Planning Area...............................2 2.1 Species Occurrences...............................................................................................2 2.2 Special-Status Species Conservation Planning ......................................................2 2.3 Special-Status Species as ESHA ............................................................................7 3.0 Special-Status Plant Species ......................................................................................9 3.1 Hickman's Onion ....................................................................................................9 3.2 Hooker's Manzanita..............................................................................................10 3.3 Sandmat Manzanita ..............................................................................................10 3.4 Monterey Ceanothus.............................................................................................10
    [Show full text]