DOCSLIB.ORG

The University of North Texas Health Science Center Campus Master Plan August 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The University of North Texas Health Science Center Campus Master Plan August 2007 The University of North Texas Health Science Center CAMPUS MASTER PLAN August 2007 STEERING COMMITTEE ADVISORY COMMITTEE J. Warren Anderson, EdD COMMUNITY MEMBERS INCLUDE EMBERS NCLUDE YSTEM EMBERS NCLUDE Senor Vce Presdent, Academc Affars UNTHSC M I UNT S M I Dean, School of Health Professons Garland Asher Warren Anderson, EdD Richard Escalante Montcello Neghborhood Representatve Senor Vce Presdent of Academc Affars and Vce Chancellor for Admnstratve Servces for Stephen Barrett Dean of the School of Health Professons UNT System Drector of Facltes Management Ed Bass Cultural Dstrct & Stock Show Representatve Stephen Barrett Richard Escalante Drector of Facltes Management Vce Chancellor for Admnstratve Servces Fernando Costa Cty Plannng Representatve Thomas Fairchild, PhD Marc Hahn, DO Assocate Vce Presdent for Insttutonal Senor Vce Presdent, Clncal Affars Marty Craddock Plannng Dean, Texas College of Osteopathc Medcne General Neghborhood Representatve Marc Hahn, DO M. Christine Kalish Geraldine Herman Senor Vce Presdent for Clncal Affars & Dean Executve Drector to the Presdent Arlngton Heghts Neghborhood of the Texas College of Osteopathc Medcne Representatve Fernando Trevino, MPH, PhD Fernando Treviño, PhD Dean, School of Publc Health Bill Meadows Dean of the School of Publc Health Stock Show Representatve Greg Upp Greg Upp Senor Vce Presdent Cathy Moates Senor Vce Presdent for Communty Communty Engagement North H Mount Neghborhood Representatve Engagement Thomas Yorio, PhD Phillip Poole Thomas Yorio, PhD Senor Vce Presdent for Research Assocated Busnesses of the Cultural Dstrct Senor Vce Presdent for Research and Dean Dean, Graduate School of Bomedcal Representatve of the Graduate School of Bomedcal Scences Scences John Robinson Carter Foundaton & Museum Representatve Chris Kalish Executve Drector to the Presdent Amy Kalina TCOM Student Representatve UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 777 Main Street CARTER & BURGESS, INC. Fort Worth, TX 76102 817.735.6000 Charles W. Nxon, AIA Prncpal In Charge www.c-b.com Bryan Floth, AIA Project Manager Pete Thomas Facltes Programmer Bob Lundeen, AIA Medcal Plannng Specalst Ed Werth, AIA Senor Desgn Archtect Davd Gustaf, AIA, LEED Project Archtect Tas Hnes, AIA Interor Desgn Randy Sorensen, FASLA Landscape Archtect Kevn Fox, PE, LEED, CEM Mechancal Engneer Chrs McEnery, PE Electrcal Engneer Cesar Vallenlla, PE Structural Engneer 320 West 13th Street POLSHEK PARTNERSHIP ARCHITECTS, LLP New York City, NY 10014 212.807.7171 James S. Polshek FAIA Prncpal Desgn Planner www.polshek.com Joseph L. Flescher FAIA Qualty Control Manager Kevn P. McClurkan AIA Project Manager Wm. Jack T. Phllps AIA Senor Desgn Planner 912 S. Capital of Texas Hwy, Suite 320 JANKEDESIGN Austin, TX 78746 512.329.8343 Kamela Janke, SEGD Graphcs/Wayfindng Consultant www.jankedesign.com Tm Janke, SEGD Graphcs/Wayfindng Consultant 17311 Dallas Parkway, Suite 300 DAL-TECH ENGINEERING, INC. Dallas, TX 75248 972.250.2727 Wayne Barton, PE Cvl Engneer www.dal-tech.com UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT Creatng a campus master plan s an exctng, Whle ths process has been exctng and re- all nclusve process nvolvng numerous stake- wardng, the publcaton of ths master plan wll holders from the cty, communty and campus. create much more exctement on our campus At the core of any campus master plan s the as we look to growng and expandng our n- algnment of the physcal development of the sttuton wth the addton of new facltes and campus to the strategc or academc plan. other programs. I wsh to take ths opportunty Ths ensures that specfic plannng prortes to thank all nvolved n ths process, and to are supported, furtherng the msson of the express my deepest thanks and grattude to nsttuton. the campus master plan Advsory and Steer- ng Commttees, and our consultng team of The Unversty of North Texas Health Scence Carter & Burgess, Inc. (Fort Worth, Texas) and Center boasts a long hstory of successful Polshek Partnershp Archtects, Inc. (New York health educaton programs. Wth these pro- Cty, New York). grams comes the need for a long term vson for the campus whch allows for populaton Sncerely, growth as well as collaboraton between ex- stng departments. The future of the Health Scence Center s contngent upon a strate- Scott Ransom, DO, MBA, MPH gc, approprate master plan geared toward future goals of expandng campus facltes to meet the needs of ncreased growth. Also, a gude to campus development s needed to allow the UNTHSC to become a unque but complmentary character n the fabrc of the surroundng area. Influences from the Cultural Dstrct to the south and tradtonal neghbor- hoods to the north and east nfluence the UN- THSC ambence. UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSFORWARD v A. INTRODUCTION C. FINAL PLAN E. APPENDIX Introducton A-3 Introducton C-3 Traffic Study E-2 Health Scence Center Msson Statement A-5 Plannng Concepts C-5 The Campus Master Plan Process A-7 Long Term Vson C-8 Gudng Prncples A-8 Final Plan Strategies Campus Spne C-10 Campus Quads C-12 B. OBSERVATIONS Campus Gardens C-14 Introducton B-3 Landscape Connectons C-17 Campus Hstory B-4 Campus Front Door C-18 Exstng Campus B-6 Montgomery Street Plan C-19 Precnct Walks B-8 Phase I Plan C-20 Representatve Campus Buldngs B-10 Sgnange and Wayfindng C-22 Nearby Developments B-16 Traffic and Parkng C-26 Campus Observations Utlty Infrastructure C-31 Major Roadways & Lnkages B-18 Perphery Use B-20 D. GUIDELINES Easements B-22 Exstng Massng B-23 Introducton D-3 Topography B-24 Architectural Design Guidelines Vstas B-26 Concepts D-4 Fgure Ground B-27 Ste - Buldng Poston and Setbacks D-6 Exstng Parkng B-28 Ste Entrances D-7 Impervous Surface B-29 Crculaton / Vew Corrdors D-8 Campus Edges B-30 Buldng Edge Flexblty D-9 Landscape B-32 Buldng Edges to Street D-10 Sgnage and Wayfindng B-34 Massng Concepts D-12 Electrcal Dstrbuton B-38 Massng Strateges D-13 Storm Sewer B-39 Artculaton Varatons D-14 Potable Water B-40 Facade Relatonshp D-17 Santary Sewer B-41 Buldng Materals D-18 Programmng B-42 Buldng Colors D-19 Lghtng Character Concepts D-20 Landscape Desgn Gudelnes D-22 UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSTABLE OF CONTENTS v INTRODUCTION A A-2 INTRODUCTION UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines INTRODUCTION In the summer of 2005, The Unversty of The plannng team began by studyng the sur- North Texas Health Scence Center (UNTHSC) roundng context, developng key strateges at Fort Worth purchased the adjacent Texas to unte the campus wth the msson of the Osteopathc Hosptal and addtonal land sur- Unversty and develop concepts whch brng roundng ths faclty (approxmately 15 acres), connectons and a sense of communty to the almost doublng the sze of the campus. Wth areas many consttuents. A seres of Gud- ths addtonal land ncrease and projected stu- ng Prncples were developed wth the Unver- dent and research growth, the UNTHSC em- sty to descrbe the deals and aspratons ths barked on a strategc plannng process to help master plan s to foster. Although t s a Health shape the future development of the campus’s Scence Center, the UNTHSC boldly shfted bult envronment. from conventon and embraced the dea of the academc campus. Ths ‘collegal envron- A campus master plan allows for the opportu- ment’ for the campus creates both nteractve nty of an nsttuton to reflect upon ts hstory, ndoor as well as outdoor spaces that support assess ts current condton, and establsh a not only the faculty, staff, and students but vson for ts future growth and prosperty. The also the surroundng communty. master plannng team of Carter & Burgess, Inc. and Polshek Partnershp Archtects, LLP were The Fnal Vson Plan sets out to strategcally chosen n early 2006 to lead the plannng pro- outlne the responsble growth of the Unversty cess and help n translatng these nsttutonal over tme whle mantanng the consstency goals and objectves of the Unversty. Con- and values establshed by the Gudng Prn- trbutons from an Advsory Commttee made cples. up of leaders from the communty, members of nearby neghborhoods, and faculty and staff from the UNTHSC were nvaluable to the master plannng team through meetngs and workshops n dentfyng and prortzng objec- tves and goals for the Unversty and the sur- roundng area. UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines INTRODUCTION A-3 A-4 INTRODUCTION UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER The Unversty of North Texas Health Scence MISSION STATEMENT Center s a research, teachng, and publc ser- To mprove the health and qualty of lfe for the vce nsttuton that focuses on the health and people of Texas and beyond through excel- well-beng of ts patents, students, faculty, staff lence n educaton, research, clncal care and and admnstraton. Recognzng the campus communty engagement and to provde na- tself as a “lvng entty,” the UNTHSC s lookng tonal leadershp n prmary care. to the master plan as an outlne of ts specfic needs, wthn the campus tself as well as the larger communty. Optons for planned growth and change at the UNTHSC should support the ntegraton of the deals of healthy lfestyles and communty that are taught and practced daly wthn the classrooms and health care facltes of the campus. Wth a planned cam- pus that reflects the aspratons and tradtons of the Health Scence Center and regon, the unversty can contnue attractng and retanng the best faculty, staff, and students. UNTHSC Master Plan and Design Guidelines INTRODUCTION A-5 1. OBSERVATIONS / PRINCIPLES 2. DATA GATHERING / ANALYSIS GERIATRIC ANNEX FOUNDERS ACTIVITY CENTER PATIENT CARE FACILITIES CENTER GEN. SERVICES/ POLICE CENTER FOR BIOHEALTH WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 27TH WEDNESDAY, GIBSON D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Seed Maturity in White Fir and Red Fir. Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Exp
    PACIFIC SOUTHWEST Forest and Range FOREST SERVICE U. S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE P.O. BOX 245, BERKELEY, CALIFORNIA 94701 Experiment Station USDA FOREST SERVICE RESEARCH PAPER PSW-99 /1974 CONTENTS Page Summary ................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................. 3 Methods .................................................... 3 Testing Fresh Seeds ....................................... 3 Testing Stratified Seeds .................................... 3 Seedling Vigor Tests ...................................... 4 Artificial Ripening Trial ................................... 4 Other Observations ........................................ 4 Results and Discussion ....................................... 5 Cone Specific Gravity ..................................... 5 Seed Germination, byCollection Date ....................... 5 Seed GerminationandCone Specific Gravity ................ 7 Red Fir Seedling Vigor .................................... 9 ArtificialRipening of White Fir Seeds ....................... 9 OtherMaturity Indices ..................................... 9 Application ................................................. 10 Literature Cited.............................................. 12 THE AUTHOR WILLIAM W. OLIVER is doing silvicultural research on Sierra Nevada conifer types with headquarters at Redding, California. He earned a B.S. degree (1956) in forestry from the University of New Hampshire, and an M.F. degree (1960) from the University of Michigan. A native of
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the AES Candidates
    Rep ort on the AES Candidates 1 2 1 3 Olivier Baudron , Henri Gilb ert , Louis Granb oulan , Helena Handschuh , 4 1 5 1 Antoine Joux , Phong Nguyen ,Fabrice Noilhan ,David Pointcheval , 1 1 1 1 Thomas Pornin , Guillaume Poupard , Jacques Stern , and Serge Vaudenay 1 Ecole Normale Sup erieure { CNRS 2 France Telecom 3 Gemplus { ENST 4 SCSSI 5 Universit e d'Orsay { LRI Contact e-mail: [email protected] Abstract This do cument rep orts the activities of the AES working group organized at the Ecole Normale Sup erieure. Several candidates are evaluated. In particular we outline some weaknesses in the designs of some candidates. We mainly discuss selection criteria b etween the can- didates, and make case-by-case comments. We nally recommend the selection of Mars, RC6, Serp ent, ... and DFC. As the rep ort is b eing nalized, we also added some new preliminary cryptanalysis on RC6 and Crypton in the App endix which are not considered in the main b o dy of the rep ort. Designing the encryption standard of the rst twentyyears of the twenty rst century is a challenging task: we need to predict p ossible future technologies, and wehavetotake unknown future attacks in account. Following the AES pro cess initiated by NIST, we organized an op en working group at the Ecole Normale Sup erieure. This group met two hours a week to review the AES candidates. The present do cument rep orts its results. Another task of this group was to up date the DFC candidate submitted by CNRS [16, 17] and to answer questions which had b een omitted in previous 1 rep orts on DFC.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of the Advanced Encryption Standard
    Volume 126, Article No. 126024 (2021) https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.024 Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Development of the Advanced Encryption Standard Miles E. Smid Formerly: Computer Security Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA [email protected] Strong cryptographic algorithms are essential for the protection of stored and transmitted data throughout the world. This publication discusses the development of Federal Information Processing Standards Publication (FIPS) 197, which specifies a cryptographic algorithm known as the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). The AES was the result of a cooperative multiyear effort involving the U.S. government, industry, and the academic community. Several difficult problems that had to be resolved during the standard’s development are discussed, and the eventual solutions are presented. The author writes from his viewpoint as former leader of the Security Technology Group and later as acting director of the Computer Security Division at the National Institute of Standards and Technology, where he was responsible for the AES development. Key words: Advanced Encryption Standard (AES); consensus process; cryptography; Data Encryption Standard (DES); security requirements, SKIPJACK. Accepted: June 18, 2021 Published: August 16, 2021; Current Version: August 23, 2021 This article was sponsored by James Foti, Computer Security Division, Information Technology Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). The views expressed represent those of the author and not necessarily those of NIST. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.024 1. Introduction In the late 1990s, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) was about to decide if it was going to specify a new cryptographic algorithm standard for the protection of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Symmetric Encryption: AES
    Symmetric Encryption: AES Yan Huang Credits: David Evans (UVA) Advanced Encryption Standard ▪ 1997: NIST initiates program to choose Advanced Encryption Standard to replace DES ▪ Why not just use 3DES? 2 AES Process ▪ Open Design • DES: design criteria for S-boxes kept secret ▪ Many good choices • DES: only one acceptable algorithm ▪ Public cryptanalysis efforts before choice • Heavy involvements of academic community, leading public cryptographers ▪ Conservative (but “quick”): 4 year process 3 AES Requirements ▪ Secure for next 50-100 years ▪ Royalty free ▪ Performance: faster than 3DES ▪ Support 128, 192 and 256 bit keys • Brute force search of 2128 keys at 1 Trillion keys/ second would take 1019 years (109 * age of universe) 4 AES Round 1 ▪ 15 submissions accepted ▪ Weak ciphers quickly eliminated • Magenta broken at conference! ▪ 5 finalists selected: • MARS (IBM) • RC6 (Rivest, et. al.) • Rijndael (Belgian cryptographers) • Serpent (Anderson, Biham, Knudsen) • Twofish (Schneier, et. al.) 5 AES Evaluation Criteria 1. Security Most important, but hardest to measure Resistance to cryptanalysis, randomness of output 2. Cost and Implementation Characteristics Licensing, Computational, Memory Flexibility (different key/block sizes), hardware implementation 6 AES Criteria Tradeoffs ▪ Security v. Performance • How do you measure security? ▪ Simplicity v. Complexity • Need complexity for confusion • Need simplicity to be able to analyze and implement efficiently 7 Breaking a Cipher ▪ Intuitive Impression • Attacker can decrypt secret messages • Reasonable amount of work, actual amount of ciphertext ▪ “Academic” Ideology • Attacker can determine something about the message • Given unlimited number of chosen plaintext-ciphertext pairs • Can perform a very large number of computations, up to, but not including, 2n, where n is the key size in bits (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Assessment of Reaction Mechanisms Using the Lisbon Kinetics Tool Suit
    XXXIV ICPIG & ICRP-10, July 14-19, 2019, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan Critical assessment of reaction mechanisms using the LisbOn KInetics tool suit 1 1 1 2 P P P P P A. Tejero-del-Caz P , V.U Guerra UP , M. Lino da Silva P , L. Marques P , 1 1,3 1 1 P P P N. Pinhão P , C. D. Pintassilgo P , T. Silva P and L. L. Alves P 1 P P Instituto de Plasmas e Fusão Nuclear, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, Lisboa, Portugal 2 P P Centro de Física da Universidade do Minho, Campus de Gualtar, Braga, Portugal 3 P P Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal This work uses the LisbOn KInetics (LoKI) tool suit to perform a critical assessment and correction of the collisional, radiative and transport mechanisms and data describing the kinetics of several gas/plasma systems. LoKI comprises two modules: a Boltzmann solver, LoKI-B (to become open- source), and a chemistry solver, LoKI-C. Both modules can run as standalone tools or coupled in a self-consistent manner. LoKI handles simulations in any atomic / molecular gas mixture, considering collisions with any target state (electronic, vibrational and rotational), specified in the reaction mechanism adopted. As output, the tool provides the electron energy distribution function and the corresponding electron macroscopic parameters, along with the densities of species and the corresponding creation / destruction rates. 1. Introduction for the heavy species (charged and neutral) present in Predictive tools for non-equilibrium low- the plasma, receiving as input data the KIT(s) for the temperature plasmas (LTPs) should properly describe gas/plasma system under study, and using several the kinetics of both the electrons and the heavy- modules to describe the mechanisms (collisional, species, the former responsible for inducing plasma radiative and transport) controlling the creation / reactivity and the latter providing the pathways for destruction of species.
    [Show full text]
  • Bruce Schneier 2
    Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives Witness Disclosure Requirement - "Truth in Testimony" Required by House Rule XI, Clause 2(g)(5) 1. Your Name: Bruce Schneier 2. Your Title: none 3. The Entity(ies) You are Representing: none 4. Are you testifying on behalf of the Federal, or a State or local Yes No government entity? X 5. Please list any Federal grants or contracts, or contracts or payments originating with a foreign government, that you or the entity(ies) you represent have received on or after January 1, 2015. Only grants, contracts, or payments related to the subject matter of the hearing must be listed. 6. Please attach your curriculum vitae to your completed disclosure form. Signatur Date: 31 October 2017 Bruce Schneier Background Bruce Schneier is an internationally renowned security technologist, called a security guru by the Economist. He is the author of 14 books—including the New York Times best-seller Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World—as well as hundreds of articles, essays, and academic papers. His influential newsletter Crypto-Gram and blog Schneier on Security are read by over 250,000 people. Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society at Harvard University, a Lecturer in Public Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the Tor Project, and an advisory board member of EPIC and VerifiedVoting.org. He is also a special advisor to IBM Security and the Chief Technology Officer of IBM Resilient.
    [Show full text]
  • Philopatry and Migration of Pacific White Sharks
    Proc. R. Soc. B doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1155 Published online Philopatry and migration of Pacific white sharks Salvador J. Jorgensen1,*, Carol A. Reeb1, Taylor K. Chapple2, Scot Anderson3, Christopher Perle1, Sean R. Van Sommeran4, Callaghan Fritz-Cope4, Adam C. Brown5, A. Peter Klimley2 and Barbara A. Block1 1Department of Biology, Stanford University, Pacific Grove, CA 93950, USA 2Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA 3Point Reyes National Seashore, P. O. Box 390, Inverness, California 94937, USA 4Pelagic Shark Research Foundation, Santa Cruz Yacht Harbor, Santa Cruz, CA 95062, USA 5PRBO Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive #11, Petaluma, CA 94954, USA Advances in electronic tagging and genetic research are making it possible to discern population structure for pelagic marine predators once thought to be panmictic. However, reconciling migration patterns and gene flow to define the resolution of discrete population management units remains a major challenge, and a vital conservation priority for threatened species such as oceanic sharks. Many such species have been flagged for international protection, yet effective population assessments and management actions are hindered by lack of knowledge about the geographical extent and size of distinct populations. Combin- ing satellite tagging, passive acoustic monitoring and genetics, we reveal how eastern Pacific white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) adhere to a highly predictable migratory cycle. Individuals persistently return to the same network of coastal hotspots following distant oceanic migrations and comprise a population genetically distinct from previously identified phylogenetic clades. We hypothesize that this strong homing behaviour has maintained the separation of a northeastern Pacific population following a historical introduction from Australia/New Zealand migrants during the Late Pleistocene.
    [Show full text]
  • Identifying Open Research Problems in Cryptography by Surveying Cryptographic Functions and Operations 1
    International Journal of Grid and Distributed Computing Vol. 10, No. 11 (2017), pp.79-98 http://dx.doi.org/10.14257/ijgdc.2017.10.11.08 Identifying Open Research Problems in Cryptography by Surveying Cryptographic Functions and Operations 1 Rahul Saha1, G. Geetha2, Gulshan Kumar3 and Hye-Jim Kim4 1,3School of Computer Science and Engineering, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India 2Division of Research and Development, Lovely Professional University, Punjab, India 4Business Administration Research Institute, Sungshin W. University, 2 Bomun-ro 34da gil, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea Abstract Cryptography has always been a core component of security domain. Different security services such as confidentiality, integrity, availability, authentication, non-repudiation and access control, are provided by a number of cryptographic algorithms including block ciphers, stream ciphers and hash functions. Though the algorithms are public and cryptographic strength depends on the usage of the keys, the ciphertext analysis using different functions and operations used in the algorithms can lead to the path of revealing a key completely or partially. It is hard to find any survey till date which identifies different operations and functions used in cryptography. In this paper, we have categorized our survey of cryptographic functions and operations in the algorithms in three categories: block ciphers, stream ciphers and cryptanalysis attacks which are executable in different parts of the algorithms. This survey will help the budding researchers in the society of crypto for identifying different operations and functions in cryptographic algorithms. Keywords: cryptography; block; stream; cipher; plaintext; ciphertext; functions; research problems 1. Introduction Cryptography [1] in the previous time was analogous to encryption where the main task was to convert the readable message to an unreadable format.
    [Show full text]
  • 2022 Kientzler Catalog
    TRIOMIO – COLOR COMBOS WITH UNIFORM PERFORMANCESRMANCES The consumer's enthusiasm for these trendy, three-coloured combos remains extremely strong! SSUPERCALUPERCAL BIDENS BIDENSBIDENS DUO CYPERUS TRIOMIO SUPERCAL ‘Summer Sensation’ TRIOMIO ‘Tweety Pop’ Bidens Duo ‘Sunshine’ ‘Southern‘Southehern Blues’BBlues’ No. 7298: SUPERCAL No. 7210: Bidens ‘Tweety’, No. 7318: Bidens ‘Sweetie’ No. 7363: Cyperus ‘Cleopatra’, ‘Blue’, ‘Light Yellow’ and ‘Pink’ Verbena VEPITA™ ‘Blue Violet’ and ‘Scarlet’ and ‘Funny Honey’ SURDIVA® ‘Blue Violet’ and SURDIVA® ‘White’ CCALIBRACHOAALIBRACHOA PPOCKETOCKET™ CALIBRACHOACALIBRACHOA UNIQUEUNIQQUE CALENDN ULA Calibrachoa POCKET™ ‘Mini Zumba’ TRIOMIO ‘Zumba’ TRIOMIO ‘Mango Punch’ TRIOMIO CALENDULA ‘Color me Spring’ No. 6981: CALIBRACHOA POCKET™ No.o. 7217:: CaCalibrachoa a oa UNIQUEU QU No.o. 7311: Calibrachoa UNIQUE ‘Mango Punch’, No. 7236: Calendula ‘Power Daisy’, ‘Yellow’, ‘Blue’ and ‘Red’ ‘Golden‘Golden Yellow’, ‘Lilac’‘Lilac’ and ‘Dark‘Dark Red’Red’ ‘Golden Yellow’ and ‘Dark Red’ Calibrachoa ‘Lilac’ and ‘Dark Red’ NEMENEMESISIA SUS PERCAL TRIOMIO NESSIE PLUS ‘Alegria’ TRIOMIO BABYCAKE ‘Little Alegria’rii’a’ TRIOMIO SUPERCAL TRIOMIO SUPERCAL ‘Garden Magic’ No. 7200: Nemesia NESSIE PLUS No. 7202: Nemesia BABYCAKE ‘Little Coco’, No. 7221: SUPERCAL ‘Blushing Pink’, No. 7234: SUPERCAL ‘Light Yellow’, ‘White’, ‘Yellow’ and ‘Red’ ‘Little Banana’ and ‘Little Cherry’ ‘Cherryh Improved’ and ‘Dark Blue’ ‘Blue’ and ‘Cherry Improved’ SUPERCAL PREMIUM VEERBR ENENAA VEPPITA™ TRIOMIO SUPERCAL PREMIUM ‘Magic’ TRIOMIO SUPERCAL
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 4.5'' Premium Potted Annuals
    2021 4.5'' Premium Potted Annuals AGERATUM MECADONIA Horizon Blue Magic Carpet Yellow ALTERNANTHERA MELAMPODIUM Fancy Filler - Choco Chili Showstar Fancy Filler - Tru Yellow MIMOSA ANGELONIA Sensative Plant Angel Face - Blue MUELENBECKIA Angel Face - Pink Wirevine Serenita White NEMESIA ARGYRANTHEMUM Blood Orange Butterfly Yellow Nessie Burgandy Grandaisy Combo Assortment Nessie Sunshine Granddasisy Beauty Yellow Rasberry Lemonade Granddasiy Yellow ORNAMENTAL CABBAGE/KALE ARTEMESIA Misc. Varieties Sea Salt OSTEOSPERMUM Silver Brocade Bright Lights Double Moon Glow BABY TEARS Osticade Pink Aquamarine Osticade White Blush BACOPA Tradewinds Cinnomon Calypso Jumbo Pinkeye Zion Denim Blue Calypso Jumbo White Zion Morning Sun Double Snowball Zion Sunset Gulliver Blue PILEA (Baby Tears) Snowstorm Giant Snowflake Baby Tears Snowstorm Snowglobe PLECTRATHUS BEGONIA Candlestick Lemon Twist Super Olympia Mix Iboza Coleoides Super Olympia Red PORTULACA - PURSLANE BIDENS Colorblast Double Magenta Mexican Gold Colorblast Lemon Twist Goldilock Rocks Colorblast Pink Lady BRIDAL VEIL Colorblast Watermelon Punch Tahitian Happy Hour Mix BROWALLIA Sundial Mix Endless White Flirtation PETUNIAS-MILLION BELLS Illumination Aloha Tiki Soft Pink CALENDULA Calitastic Aubergine Star Caleo Orange Calitastic Mango Caleo Yellow Calitastic Mango CELOSIA Calitastic MB Butterpop New Look Calitastic Orange Imp Fresh Look Mix Chameleon Frozen Ice CLEOME Colibri Cherry Lace Clemantine Assorted MF Neo Dark Blue Clio Magenta MF Neo Double Red Clio Pink Lady MF Neo Double Yellow COLEUS MF Neo Lava Red Eye Beauty of Lyon MF Neo Pink Light Eye Chocolate Mint MF Neo Vampire Kingswood Torch MF Neo White Kong Lime Sprite Million Bells Light Blue Kong Mosiac Million Bells Mound Yellow Kong Red Million Bells True Blue Kong- Rose Million Bells True Yellow Kong Salmon Pink Million Bells White Limetime Mini Famous Eclipse Lilac Mainstreet Alligater Alley Mini Famous Orange/Yellow Mainstreet Riverwalk Mini Famous Raspberry Star Mainstreet Ruby Road Mini Famous Tart Deco Mainstreet Sunset Blvd.
    [Show full text]
  • SHARK ECONO 2512__Dec17 Roll Fed Media Remove
    PRINTER SPECIFICATIONS MEDIA w w w . s t r a t o j e t u s a . c o m Handling 4 zone vacuum table Rigid media support 100”x48” & 11 lb/ft2 (254 x 122 cm & 50 Kg/m2) Max thickness 4” (10 cm) PRINT SPEEDS (Vary depending on final configuration) Maximum speed 1100 ft2/hr (102 m2/hr), (34 Boards/hr)** Production 540 ft2/hr (50 m2/hr), (17 Boards/hr)** PRINTING Max print resolution 1200 dpi Drop size Variable 5, 15 & 30 Picoliter Margin Full bleed capable Printhead Ricoh Gen5 UV curable lamp type LED, estimated life 18,000* hrs Ink type Sola UV curable ink Ink capacity 2.5 Liter reservoirs Connectivity USB Supported RIP Software Caldera / Onyx / SAi DIMENSIONS Assembled dimensions (L x W x H) 175” x 80” x 60” (445 x 205 x 153 cm) Weight assembled (approx) 2650 lb (1202 Kg) Shipping dimensions (L x W x H) 185” x 90” x 75” (470 x 230 x 191 cm) SHARK EFB-2512 Rigid/Flexible Substrate Printers Weight shipping (approx) 3310 lb (1502 Kg) OPERATION CONDITIONS Temperature 68 to 86 oF (20 to 30 oC) Max versatility Print the widest variety of rigid and flexible substrates Humidity 40% to 70% non-condensing Electrical 220 VAC (± 10%) 50/60 Hz 30A Increased quality and productivity Benefit from 1200 dpi grayscale output and feature rich design Warranty Limited one year parts & labour Robust design Experience years of production with confidence Affordability Choose the Shark EFB-2512 for its simplicity, affordability and to save money by printing North / South America Europe / Middle East / Africa India / Asia / Pacific direct to rigids.
    [Show full text]
  • Magenta and Magenta Production
    MAGENTA AND MAGENTA PRODUCTION Historically, the name Magenta has been used to refer to the mixture of the four major constituents comprising Basic Fuchsin, namely Basic Red 9 (Magenta 0), Magenta I (Rosaniline), Magenta II, and Magenta III (New fuchsin). Although samples of Basic Fuchsin can vary considerably in the proportions of these four constituents, today each of these compounds except Magenta II is available commercially under its own name. Magenta I and Basic Red 9 are the most widely available. 1. Exposure Data 1.1 Chemical and physical data 1.1.1 Magenta I (a) Nomenclature Chem. Abstr. Serv. Reg. No.: 632–99–5 CAS Name: 4-[(4-Aminophenyl)(4-imino-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-ylidene)methyl]-2- methylbenzenamine, hydrochloride (1:1) Synonyms: 4-[(4-Aminophenyl)(4-imino-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-ylidene)methyl]-2- methylbenzenamine, monohydrochloride; Basic Fuchsin hydrochloride; C.I. 42510; C.I. Basic Red; C.I. Basic Violet 14; C.I. Basic Violet 14, monohydrochloride; 2- methyl-4,4'-[(4-imino-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-ylidene)methylene]dianiline hydrochloride; rosaniline chloride; rosaniline hydrochloride –297– 298 IARC MONOGRAPHS VOLUME 99 (b) Structural formula, molecular formula, and relative molecular mass NH HCl H2N NH2 CH3 C20H19N3.HCl Rel. mol. mass: 337.85 (c) Chemical and physical properties of the pure substance Description: Metallic green, lustrous crystals (O’Neil, 2006; Lide, 2008) Melting-point: Decomposes above 200 °C (O’Neil, 2006; Lide, 2008) Solubility: Slightly soluble in water (4 mg/mL); soluble in ethanol (30 mg/mL) and ethylene
    [Show full text]