fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 1

REVIEW published: 07 June 2016 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00797

Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

Caspar Langenbach1*, Ruth Campe2, Sebastian F. Beyer1, André N. Mueller1 and Uwe Conrath1

1 Department of Plant Physiology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany, 2 BASF Plant Science Company GmbH, Limburgerhof, Germany

Phakopsora pachyrhizi is a biotrophic fungus provoking SBR disease. SBR poses a major threat to global soybean production. Though several R genes provided soybean immunity to certain P. pachyrhizi races, the pathogen swiftly overcame this resistance. Therefore, fungicides are the only current means to control SBR. However, insensitivity to fungicides is soaring in P. pachyrhizi and, therefore, alternative measures are needed for SBR control. In this article, we discuss the different approaches for fighting SBR and their potential, disadvantages, and advantages over other measures. These encompass conventional breeding for SBR resistance, transgenic approaches, exploitation of transcription factors, secondary metabolites, and antimicrobial peptides, RNAi/HIGS, and biocontrol strategies. It seems that an integrating approach exploiting different measures is likely to provide the best possible means for the effective control of SBR.

Keywords: Asian soybean rust, Phakopsora pachyrhizi, fungicide insensitivity, host resistance, non-host resistance, plant breeding, plant biotechnology

Edited by: Pietro Daniele Spanu, INTRODUCTION Imperial College London, UK Reviewed by: SBR is currently the most severe soybean (Glycine max) disease. SBR is caused by Phakopsora Brigitte Mauch-Mani, pachyrhizi. The biotrophic basidiomycete threatens soybean production all over the globe, but Université de Neuchâtel, Switzerland the threat is most severe in the major soybean growing areas in South America. In Brazil SBR Francismar Corrêa has caused crop losses of more than US$ 10 billion since its first endemic outbreak in 2001 Marcelino-Guimarães, (Yorinori et al., 2005; da Silva et al., 2014). Currently, three major strategies serve to manage Embrapa Soybean, Brazil SBR (Figure 1). First, applying chemical fungicides. Second, breeding or engineering of SBR- *Correspondence: resistant soybean cultivars, and third, employing specific cultivation practices, such as planting Caspar Langenbach early ripening varieties, monitoring fields, eliminating secondary hosts, and introducing soybean- [email protected] free growth periods (60–90 days) in the threatened areas (Hartman et al., 2005; Godoy, 2011; Specialty section: Kendrick et al., 2011). Here, we elaborate on these strategies, and we also discuss the potential This article was submitted to of AMPs, RNAi/HIGS, and biocontrol measures for controlling SBR. A detailed description of the Plant Biotic Interactions, life cycle, host range and distribution of P. pachyrhizi has been provided earlier (Goellner et al., a section of the journal 2010). Frontiers in Plant Science Received: 23 December 2015 Accepted: 22 May 2016 Published: 07 June 2016 Abbreviations: AMP, Antimicrobial peptide; CRISPR, Clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeats; DMI, Citation: Demethylation inhibitor; dsRNA, Double stranded RNA; ETI, Effector-triggered immunity; FRAC, Fungicide Resistance Action Committee; HESP, Haustoria-expressed secreted protein; HIGS, Host-induced gene silencing; IAP, Intragenic Langenbach C, Campe R, Beyer SF, antimicrobial peptide; JA, Jasmonic acid; MDR, Muldidrug resistance; NB-LRR, Nucleotide-binding leucine-rich repeat; Mueller AN and Conrath U (2016) NHR, non-host resistance; PDR, Partial disease resistance; QoI, Quinone outside inhibitor; R gene, Resistance gene; Fighting Asian Soybean Rust. RNAi, RNA interference; Rpp, Resistance to P. pachyrhizi; S gene, Susceptibility gene; SA, Salicylic acid; SAR, Systemic Front. Plant Sci. 7:797. acquired resistance; SBR, Asian soybean rust; SDHI, Succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor; siRNA, Small interfering RNA; TF, doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00797 Transcription factor; TILLING, Targeting induced local lesions in genomes; VIGS, Virus-induced gene silencing.

Frontiers in Plant Science | www.frontiersin.org 1 June 2016 | Volume 7 | Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 2

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

FIGURE 1 | Strategies for controlling SBR. Exploitation of different genetic resources (host and non-host plants), biocontrol agents, and chemical fungicides to combat Phakopsora pachyrhizi. ap, appressorium; gt, germ tube; sp, uredospore.

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 2 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 3

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

Chemical Control of SBR 2012). Therefore, early SBR detection and precise forecasts are Fungicide use is the most effective means for controlling SBR required for efficient SBR disease management. these days. In Brazil, at least three fungicide applications are Probably the best and most sustainable control of SBR is needed per season thus raising costs of ∼US$2 billion for soybean by providing soybean genotypes resisting P. pachyrhizi (see disease control annually (Godoy et al., 2015). In contrast to below). Growth of SBR resistant genotypes is likely to be multisite fungicides (e.g., mancozeb) with comparatively low associated with reduced fungicide use. This then might decrease performance, the DMI and the QoI classes of fungicide are soybean production costs, improve the CO2 footprint of soybean prime chemicals for fighting P. pachyrhizi. Since 2013, fungicides products, and minimize the potential risk of ecological and of the highly active SDHI class are available for SBR control sanitary actions resulting from extensive use of fungicides (Guicherit et al., 2014). Because this new fungicide class performs (Maltby et al., 2009; Verweij et al., 2009; Wightwick et al., 2010). extraordinarily well, the number of available SDHI fungicides and the intensity of their use is likely to steadily increase over the next Resources of SBR Resistance in couple of years (Godoy et al., 2015). However, the excessive use Soybean of fungicides increases the chance of fungal strains with evolved R Genes, R Gene Pyramids, and Engineered R Genes insensitivity to the fungicides in use. In the recent past, this was true for the azole-class fungicides to which P. pachyrhizi and Analysis of soybean genotypes disclosed six dominant R other fungal pathogens have become insensitive (Godoy, 2012). genes conferring immunity (no visible symptoms) or resistance The FRAC assigned rust fungi, including P. pachyrhizi, to the (reddish brown lesions and reduced sporulation) to specific low-risk group of fungi (Brent and Holloman, 2007). However, P. pachyrhizi isolates. Those loci were referred to as Rpp 1–6 P. pachyrhizi and other causes of polycyclic plant diseases are genes (Bromfield and Hartwig, 1980; McLean and Byth, 1980; highly likely to evolve fungicide insensitivity because of the high Bromfield and Melching, 1982; Hartwig and Bromfield, 1983; number of spores they produce (Bradley, 2007). Hartwig, 1986; Garcia et al., 2008; Li et al., 2012). However, Rpp genes provide resistance exclusively to individual P. pachyrhizi The mechanism of fungal insensitivity to DMIs is highly isolates (race-specific disease resistance). Therefore, no currently complex and variable. After several years of fungicide use, available soybean genotype would ward off all P. pachyrhizi a significant reduction in DMI efficacy to P. pachyrhizi was isolates (Monteros et al., 2007). In addition, Rpp gene-mediated detected in Brazil (Scherm et al., 2009; Barbosa et al., 2013; resistance was swiftly overcome in the field (Yorinori et al., 2005; Reis et al., 2015). The insensitivity is caused either by point Garcia et al., 2008). Employing recessive R genes might represent mutations in the fungal cyp51 gene or by cyp51 overexpression another approach for providing stable SBR resistance (Calvo (Schmitz et al., 2014). The major mechanism of QoI and SDHI et al., 2008). In fact, three recessive R genes to P. pachyrhizi have insensitivity is by point mutations in the cyt b and sdh b/c/d been identified in the soybean genotypes PI 200456, PI 224270, genes, respectively. These mutations were reported for many and BR01-18437 (Calvo et al., 2008; Pierozzi et al., 2008). These plant-pathogenic fungi (Kim et al., 2003; Grasso et al., 2006a; genes are now awaiting exploitation in breeding and genetic Sierotzki et al., 2007; Sierotzki and Scalliet, 2013). The most engineering for SBR resistance. common mutation for QoI insensitivity [substitution of glycine Developing elite lines and varieties requires breeders to to alanine at position 143 of Cyt b] was not yet detected in combine traits from multiple parents, a process called gene rusts probably because of presence of a type-I intron after codon pyramiding or stacking (Francis et al., 2012). Pyramiding R genes 143 (Grasso et al., 2006a,b,c; Oliver, 2014; Klosowski et al., into a single genetic background is another proposed strategy for 2015). Nucleotide substitutions in this codon would prevent conferring soybean resistance to multiple P. pachyrhizi isolates intron splicing thus leading to a defective Cyt b protein (Grasso (Hartman et al., 2005; Garcia et al., 2008; Lemos et al., 2011; et al., 2006a). However, another cyt b mutation (F129L) was Maphosa et al., 2012; Yamanaka et al., 2013, 2015; Bhor et al., reported to confer QoI insensitivity in various fungi including 2014). The SBR resistant Japanese soybean cultivar Hyuuga P. pachyrhizi (Leiminger et al., 2014; Klosowski et al., 2015). represents a natural example of R gene pyramiding (Kendrick For P. pachyrhizi SDHI insensitivity was not reported yet. et al., 2011). In line with this finding, soybean genotypes However, the increased use of SDHIs is likely to further enhance harboring two pyramided Rpp genes exhibited higher SBR the selection pressure for SDHI insensitivity in P. pachyrhizi resistance than their ancestors containing only single R genes (Godoy et al., 2015). MDR, as reported for Botrytis cinerea and (Maphosa et al., 2012; Bhor et al., 2015). Synergistic effects other fungi (Kretschmer et al., 2009) also was not observed in were also observed when three R genes were bred into a P. pachyrhizi so far. To assess the risk and impact of fungicide- single soybean genotype (Lemos et al., 2011; Yamanaka et al., insensitive isolates, we recommend generating insensitive fungal 2013, 2015). Remarkably, a combination of multiple R genes mutants in the laboratory. Investigating such mutants is likely conferred resistance to different P. pachyrhizi isolates from to disclose mechanisms underlying fungicide insensitivity, enable various origin (including two highly virulent strains from Brazil; recommendations for avoiding selection of insensitive fungal Yamanaka et al., 2015). Although molecular markers facilitate populations, and developing novel mode-of-action fungicides. breeding approaches, traditional breeding is still time consuming, Applying fungicides preventively or as early as possible in the and introducing unwanted traits (Salomon and Sessa, 2012). diseases cycle before or shortly after P. pachyrhizi infection is Furthermore, SBR resistance based on static R gene pyramids crucial for effective SBR control (Mueller et al., 2009; Godoy, will likely be overcome upon longer use in the field (McDonald,

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 3 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 4

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

2014) as has been reported for other crops like wheat or (including obligate biotrophic fungi such as powdery mildew; barley (McDonald and Linde, 2002). Therefore, transforming Cao et al., 1998; Chern et al., 2005; Chen et al., 2012). Because of expression cassettes with alternative R gene combinations into possible side effects of NPR1 overexpression (Chern et al., 2005), elite soybean lines and dynamic turnover of such lines in such as yield reduction, the potential of this gene for generating the field might represent a promising strategy for providing SBR-resistant soybean varieties awaits assessment. sustainable and effective SBR resistance (McDonald and Linde, EDS1 and PAD4 are key regulators of several types of plant 2002). However, for cloning and utilization of such multi R disease resistance (basal, R gene-mediated, and NHR). The two gene expression cassettes the identity of Rpp genes needs to be proteins are required for accumulation of SA, and they control revealed. Although SBR resistance loci have been mapped to various SA-dependent defense pathways (Falk et al., 1999; Jirage different linkage groups on various chromosomes (reviewed by et al., 1999; Nawrath et al., 2002; Lipka et al., 2005; Wiermer Bhor et al., 2014), the identity of Rpp genes has remained largely et al., 2005; Langenbach et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2014). Because unknown. One exception is represented by the NB-LRR encoding silencing of GmEDS1 or GmPAD4 lead to susceptibility of gene Rpp4C4 that is likely responsible for Rpp4-mediated SBR otherwise resistant soybean lines carrying Rpp2, EDS1 and PAD4 resistance (Meyer et al., 2009). seem to control also Rpp2-mediated SBR resistance in soybean Another possibility to enhance the resistance of soybean to (Pandey et al., 2011). SA accumulation is thus likely to limit the SBR is to identify and exploit R genes conferring resistance growth and reproduction of P. pachyrhizi in soybean. Because to multiple pathogens. Several examples of such broadly active PAD4 is also required for Arabidopsis postinvasion NHR to R genes exist in nature (Nombela et al., 2003; Narusaka P. pachyrhizi (Langenbach et al., 2013), SA-associated defense et al., 2009; Atamian et al., 2012; Lozano-Torres et al., 2012). responses seem to be highly effective in antagonizing SBR disease. A complementary approach for broadened pathogen effector However, overexpression of SA biosynthesis genes is likely not to recognition uses random mutagenesis or rational design of provide a realistic agronomical solution for SBR control because synthetic NB-LRR immune receptors. Editing the potato NB- constitutive SA accumulation often causes dwarfism (Bowling LRR receptor R3a at a single amino acid significantly expanded et al., 1994; Li et al., 2001). its response to Phytophthora infestans-derived effectors (Segretin In Arabidopsis and soybean, P. pachyrhizi activates expression et al., 2014). Effectively mutating the R3a orthologue I2 in of JA-responsive genes at early stages of infection (Loehrer et al., tomato enhanced the response to the P. infestans AVR3a effector, 2008; Alves et al., 2015) and before actual penetration [likely by conferred partial immunity to potato blight, and expanded the secreted P. pachyrhizi effectors (Campe et al., 2014)]. Since JA response spectrum to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici is considered eliciting immune responses against necrotrophic effectors compared to tomato plants expressing the wild-type I2 pathogens (Pieterse et al., 2012) P. pachyrhizi pretends being gene (Giannakopoulou et al., 2015). R gene engineering might a necrotroph at initial stages of colonization. By doing so, also succeed in exploiting multiple Rpp genes for conferring an it may circumvent effective SA-dependent defense signaling expanded response to multiple P. pachyrhizi isolates. Rpp4C4 which is known to be crucial to ward off biotrophic pathogens. (Meyer et al., 2009) may serve for engineering such R gene Thus, engineering soybean plants for the fast and robust variants by untargeted protein evolution. Furthermore, genome accumulation of SA, or exploiting SA-activated downstream editing may be used for the targeted evolution of NB-LRRs. signaling components for resistance might be a suited strategy In fact, genome-wide sequence analysis predicted nearly all for providing soybean varieties resisting SBR at low risks for soybean NB-LRR-encoding genes an be targeted specifically by energetic tradeoffs. CRISPR/Cas9 (Xie et al., 2014). Transcription factors Signaling Components of R Gene-Mediated SBR The importance of TFs in conferring SBR resistance became Resistance obvious when van de Mortel et al.(2007) and Schneider Several studies reported differential defense responses to SBR et al.(2011) found that TF genes are being overrepresented attack in susceptible and resistant soybean genotypes. The studies among genes whose expression is activated in the biphasic included analysis of transcriptional dynamics, proteome changes, transcriptional response in SBR-resistant soybean genotypes or metabolic alterations to identify loci, genes, proteins, and harboring Rpp2 or Rpp3. Amongst others, genes encoding metabolites associated with ETI to P. pachyrhizi in soybean. WRKY, bHLH, and MYB TFs were activated in incompatible, but not compatible, soybean-P. pachyrhizi interactions. When Signaling network hubs and phytohormones GmWRKY36, GmWRKY40, GmWRKY45, and GmMYB84 were Transcriptome analysis disclosed different components of Rpp2- individually silenced using VIGS, Rpp2-mediated SBR resistance mediated resistance to SBR in soybean (van de Mortel et al., 2007; was gone (Pandey et al., 2011). Several other studies also Pandey et al., 2011). Of 140 candidates tested by VIGS, eleven revealed differential expression of TFs in incompatible or genes clearly contributed to Rpp2-mediated SBR resistance. The compatible soybean-P. pachyrhizi interactions (Panthee et al., genes encompassed GmEDS1, GmPAD4, and GmNPR1. 2009; Morales et al., 2013; Aoyagi et al., 2014). In fact, there NPR1 is a master regulator of SAR in Arabidopsis thaliana seems to be considerable overlap of TF activity in Rpp2, Rpp3, and some other plants (reviewed by Fu and Dong, 2013). When and Rpp4-mediated soybean disease resistance (Morales et al., overexpressed in Arabidopsis, rice, tobacco, or apple, NPR1 2013). Therefore, these TFs seem to be excellent candidates enhances resistance to infectious oomycetes, bacteria, and fungi for engineering SBR resistance. However, manipulation of TF

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 4 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 5

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

balance may affect agronomic traits because TFs regulate a Schneider et al., 2011). Functional evidence for the importance of diverse array of loci. phenylpropanoid pathway genes in soybean’s SBR resistance was In another approach, Cooper et al.(2011) compared nuclear provided by Pandey et al.(2011). The authors demonstrated that proteome changes in a resistant vs. susceptible genotype at 24 h silencing of soybean phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (GmPAL) or after inoculation with P. pachyrhizi. Their analysis disclosed more O-methyl transferase1 (GmOMT1) compromised Rpp2-mediated than 200 proteins that specifically accumulated in the nucleus SBR resistance. OMT1 silencing also partially impaired Rpp1- of SBR-resistant soybean plants harboring Rpp1 (Cooper et al., mediated SBR resistance (Cooper et al., 2013) and significantly 2011). Silencing two predicted soybean TFs (Glyma14g11400, decreased lignin content (Pandey et al., 2011). The latter result PHD superfamily and Glyma12g30600, zinc finger TF) via VIGS points to an important role of lignification in rejecting SBR. partially compromised Rpp1-conferred SBR resistance (Cooper et al., 2013). Similarly, Bencke-Malato et al.(2014) demonstrated Susceptibility Genes and Effector Targets that accumulation of mRNA transcripts for several WRKY TFs Different from dominant R genes conferring effective, but was faster and more robust in a resistant than susceptible exclusively race-specific and non-durable resistance (Yorinori soybean accession. Consistently, the simultaneous silencing of et al., 2005; Garcia et al., 2008), the loss of functional S genes can four identified WRKY genes rendered soybean plants more eventually provide durable disease resistance (Pavan et al., 2010; susceptible to SBR disease. Because the authors did not succeed Gawehns et al., 2013). For example, in barley absence of the S in producing WRKY-overexpressing soybean lines (Bencke- gene Mlo results in an incompatible interaction with Blumeria Malato et al., 2014), the potential of WRKY overexpression graminis f. sp. hordei that resembles NHR (Humphry et al., 2006). for providing SBR resistance to susceptible soybean genotypes S genes function either as susceptibility factors or suppressors of remained unclear. plant defense. Thus they are potential targets of fungal effectors. Consistent with this assumption knocking out S genes leads to Secondary metabolism recessive resistance with effectivity to multiple races of a given Plants can halt or slow down infection by constitutive or pathogen (Pavan et al., 2010). This type of resistance is very stable. inducible accumulation of antimicrobial and/or cell wall- The resistance of plants harboring recessive alleles of Mlo (barley) fortifying secondary metabolites (Chiang and Norris, 1983; or eIF4E (pepper) has not been overcome in the field for 30– Hahlbrock and Scheel, 1989; Chang et al., 1995; Dixon et al., 50 years (Lyngkjær et al., 2000; Kang et al., 2005). Breeding for 2002; Boerjan et al., 2003; La Camera et al., 2004; Vogt, S gene variants insensitive to manipulation by pathogen effectors 2010). Secondary metabolites also contribute to the outcome of therefore has huge potential for durable, broad-spectrum disease the soybean–P. pachyrhizi interaction. Daidzein, genistein, and resistance; although loss-of-function mutations in S genes may glyceollin are isoflavonoids that accumulate in both resistant be associated with pleiotropic detrimental effects (Büschges et al., and susceptible soybean genotypes upon P. pachyrhizi infection 1997). (Lygin et al., 2009). Glyceollin efficiently reduces P. pachyrhizi Soybean S genes to SBR have not been identified so far. uredospore germination in vitro (Lygin et al., 2009). Further However, several approaches might identify potential S gene evidence for a role of phytoalexins in SBR resistance was alleles for SBR resistance in soybean. Because most S genes provided by Bilgin et al.(2009). The authors disclosed that SBR of agricultural value were identified in screens for recessive resistance in a Glycine tomentella accession correlated with the resistance in wild species of plant (Bai et al., 2005), searching for presence of a flavonoid that also inhibited P. pachyrhizi spore such a resistance in wild Glycine might similarly provide genetic germination (Chung and Singh, 2008). The high potential of resources for breeding or engineering SBR resistance in G. max. phytoalexins in defeating SBR is further supported by medicarpin Another option for identifying soybean S genes to SBR is accumulating in P. pachyrhizi-infected Medicago truncatula, a via sequence homology search to known S genes. Functional non-host of P. pachyrhizi. Consistently, medicarpin inhibits analysis can be done using, for example, soybean insertion P. pachyrhizi spore germination (Ishiga et al., 2015). Providing mutants (Mathieu et al., 2009), performing VIGS (Zhang and such comparative large-scale metabolic profiles from resistant Ghabrial, 2006; Zhang et al., 2010, 2013; Pandey et al., 2011), vs. susceptible soybean varieties, or other SBR-resistant species TILLING (Cooper et al., 2008), or applying targeted genome would likely identify more secondary metabolites inhibiting editing techniques such as CRISPR/Cas9 (Jacobs et al., 2015). SBR. Genes in their biosynthesis pathways could be used to However, currently only one gene [the Cys(2)His(2) zinc finger engineer SBR resistance in transgenic soybean. Alternatively, TF palmate-like pentafoliata1, PALM1] that would classify as the compound(s) themselves could serve as natural fungicides an SBR S gene is known from M. truncatula (Uppalapati et al., in spray application, especially if they can be produced at 2012). Alternatively, fungal effectors might serve as guides to low costs and in sufficient quantities for use in agriculture. identify novel S genes in soybean and other plants since several In a variety of studies, genes in the phenylpropanoid and effectors of bacteria, fungi, or oomycetes were shown to target flavonoid metabolism were overrepresented when analyzing plant S genes (reviewed by Gawehns et al., 2013). Although the transcriptional response of infected soybean genotypes various analyses identified stage-specific rust proteins that might with SBR resistance (van de Mortel et al., 2007; Choi et al., have bona-fide effector function (Loehrer and Schaffrath, 2011; 2008; Panthee et al., 2009; Schneider et al., 2011). Overall, Stone et al., 2012; Link et al., 2014), their role as virulence activation of these genes was faster and stronger in SBR-resistant factors awaits functional confirmation. Identification of effector accessions than in susceptible ones (van de Mortel et al., 2007; proteins and corresponding S gene targets was likely hampered by

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 5 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 6

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

missing P. pachyrhizi genome information (Loehrer et al., 2014). evaluation of a genotype’s tolerance and commercial value at Transformation protocols enabling generation of P. pachyrhizi small scale laboratory conditions (Tukamuhabwa and Maphosa, knockout mutants are also missing. 2010). Nonetheless, identification of genes for SBR tolerance Another approach for identifying S gene alleles conferring SBR using, e.g., comparative transcriptome or proteome analysis, may resistance is via screening of mutagenized soybean populations enable provision of soybean varieties with capacity for enhanced for loss-of-susceptibility mutants. The tetraploid nature of the yield at high SBR pressure. soybean crop and the potential existence of multiple S gene copies might hamper this approach. Because 12 duplicated Antimicrobial Peptides copies of a given DNA region might be present in the soybean AMPs can provide disease resistance to plants (Rahnamaeian, genome (Cannon and Shoemaker, 2012), mutagenesis-induced 2011). However, AMPs did not serve to fight SBR so far. Brand phenotypic variation might be buffered by gene redundancy et al.(2012) introduced a method for the identification and (Bolon et al., 2014). However, fast neuron irradiation recently employment of putative AMPs encrypted in soybean protein provided more than 27,000 unique soybean mutants with sequences. This approach was meant to provide an alternative significant phenotypic variation (Bolon et al., 2011, 2014). to transgenic approaches that expressed AMPs from other The mutants may facilitate genetic screens for loss of SBR organisms. Using in situ assays, Brand et al.(2012) found that susceptibility mutants with interesting resistance phenotypes IAPs conferred SBR resistance in a manner similar to AMPs from similar to the M. truncatula irg1 mutant (Ishiga et al., 2015). Phyllomedusa ssp. (dermaseptin SI) or Drosophila melanogaster Identified S gene alleles for SBR resistance in soybean might be (penetratin) when co-incubated with fungal uredospores on engineered in elite soybean lines via genome editing (Jacobs et al., susceptible soybean leaves. In addition, soybean plants expressing 2015). a putative antimicrobial fragment of the G. max D-myo-inositol 3-phosphate synthase [IAP gb|ABM17058.1| (213–231)] showed Genes Providing Quantitative SBR Resistance or enhanced resistance to P. pachyrhizi (Brand et al., 2012). These Tolerance findings illustrate the feasibility of trans- or cisgenic AMP Forward genetic screens using activation-tagged soybean plants expression for SBR resistance. (Mathieu et al., 2009) could identify genes and loci that quantitatively contribute to SBR resistance. Genes and loci for Alternative Sources of SBR Resistance SBR resistance can potentially also be found exploiting fungal Wild Glycine Species and Other Alternative Hosts effectors targeting proteins with a role in apoplastic immunity Wild perennial Glycine species might serve as valuable resources [e.g., the Ustilago maydis effector Pit2 targets maize apoplastic of germplasm for SBR resistance. This is because Glycine cysteine proteases (Mueller et al., 2013)]. clandestina, Glycine canescens, Glycine tabacina, Glycine PDR to SBR is found in ‘slow rusting’ soybean accessions such tomentella, and Glycine argyrea all display pathotype-specific as SRE-Z-11A, SRE-Z-11B, and SRE-Z-15A (Tukamuhabwa resistance to P. pachyrhizi (Burdon and Speer, 1984; Burdon, and Maphosa, 2010). These genotypes can potentially provide 1987, 1988; Jarosz and Burdon, 1990). In G. clandestina, useful genes and loci for quantitative SBR resistance. PDR is G. canescens, and G. argyrea differential SBR resistance characterized by low infection frequency, long-lasting latency, phenotypes are linked to presence or absence of single or small lesions, and reduced spore production per uredinium. multiple (pyramided) R genes (Burdon and Speer, 1984; Thus, PDR reduces SBR epidemics (Tukamuhabwa and Burdon, 1987, 1988; Jarosz and Burdon, 1990). The resistance Maphosa, 2010). Since PDR is polygenic and effective to multiple of G. tomentella accession PI 441001 to P. pachyrhizi, however, pathogen races (Long et al., 2006), identification, and transfer was associated with accumulation of an antifungal flavonoid of genes from partially resistant to susceptible soybean varieties inhibiting P. pachyrhizi spore germination (Chung and Singh, might provide only partial but durable resistance to diverse 2008). Because Singh and Nelson(2015) obtained fertile SBR- P. pachyrhizi isolates. Because of PDR’s polygenic nature and the resistant plants from crosses of G. max and G. tomentella, time-consuming process for selecting partially resistant progeny, transfer of R genes from wild perennial species to commercial such soybean varieties have not attracted much attention as soybean varieties via intersubgenic hybridization seems to be sources for SBR resistance in the past (Hartman et al., 2005). a powerful strategy for SBR resistance. The novel hybrid plant Besides soybean genotypes with partial resistance, SBR- is still to be analyzed for its yield and resistance to multiple tolerant accessions also have not been a subject of molecular P. pachyrhizi isolates which will disclose the commercial value of research. Although susceptible to SBR, these genotypes do better the hybrid. tolerate the presence of P. pachyrhizi and produce reasonably Other SBR resistance traits are present in G. soja. The species is high yield even when severely infected. Yield may increase closer related to G. max than its above mentioned wild perennial by 30–60% using SBR-tolerant varieties in the presence of relatives (Bromfield, 1984). However, because of presence of P. pachyrhizi (Tukamuhabwa and Maphosa, 2010). Furthermore, undesired traits, generating hybrids for commercialization using planting tolerant varieties does not pose selection pressure on G. soja or the wild, perennial Glycine species will likely P. pachyrhizi, thus minimizing the risk of selecting adapted require elaborate backcrossing and selection. Identifying the pathogen races (Arias et al., 2008). However, SBR disease genetic basis of SBR resistance in wild species followed by tolerance of a given soybean accession is assessed with respect to engineered transfer of genes and/or traits to elite varieties its yield capacity. This requires multi-site field trials and hinders might represent an alternative, more promising strategy for SBR

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 6 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 7

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

resistance. The approach circumvents the drawbacks associated frequently developed haustoria (Langenbach et al., 2013). with hybridization strategies. However, only few attempts (e.g., However, extensive mesophyll colonization and sporulation did Soria-Guerra et al., 2010) identified gene candidates to condition not occur in any Arabidopsis mutants tested. SBR resistance in wild Glycine species. To identify components of Arabidopsis postinvasion resistance Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) is a leguminous weed that hosts to P. pachyrhizi, Langenbach et al.(2013, 2016) performed P. pachyrhizi and could provide traits for SBR resistance. Genetic comparative transcriptional profiling of genes specifically variation is high among different kudzu populations but low activated upon P. pachyrhizi infection in pen2 (a mutant with within a same population (Sun et al., 2005). As a consequence, intact postinvasion resistance) but not pen2 pad4 sag101 (with individual kudzu plants are resistant/immune or susceptible compromised postinvasion resistance). The screen identified to diverse P. pachyrhizi isolates (Bonde et al., 2009). In a BRIGHT TRICHOMES 1 (BRT1), an UDP-glycosyltransferase kudzu genotype with immunity to SBR the early abrogation in the phenylpropanoid metabolism. Postinvasion resistance of P. pachyrhizi infection correlated with cell wall appositions to P. pachyrhizi was impaired in the pen2 brt1 double mutant. and cell death in the leaf epidermis (Jordan et al., 2010). This In this genotype the fungus developed more haustoria than in finding suggests presence of early, effective defense responses pen2. Since brt1 mutants were not affected in preinvasion SBR in immune kudzu genotypes. Big differences in the response resistance (Langenbach et al., 2013), BRT1 seems to specifically to P. pachyrhizi infection were also seen in several other contribute to postinvasion NHR to the disease. legume species (Slaminko et al., 2008). Vigna adenantha PI To identify more genes that function in Arabidopsis NHR 312898, for instance, is immune to SBR as are individual bean to SBR, Langenbach et al.(2016) searched for genes co- (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars (Miles et al., 2007; Souza et al., regulated with BRT1. Upon confirming the genes’ importance 2014). However, lack of genomic information and low genetic in Arabidopsis postinvasion resistance, the authors expressed accessibility of alternative P. pachyrhizi hosts impede candidate these genes in soybean. Four so-called postinvasion-induced gene identification and gene transfer. NHR genes (PINGs) indeed reduced SBR disease severity. The supposed function of individual PING proteins is quite Non-host Plants diverse and includes an EARLI4-like phospholipase (PING4), Over the past decade, employing non-host plants has become a group I receptor-like kinase (PING5), a GDSL-like lipase a promising approach for identifying resistance traits. Due (PING7), and a germin-like protein (PING9). The exact mode to the pervasive nature of NHR, the strategy explores a of action of PINGs in conferring resistance to P. pachyrhizi vast genetic resource. NHR is a multi-layered, complex type has remained elusive (Langenbach et al., 2016). However, the of plant disease resistance that shares signaling and defense study discloses that interspecies gene transfer is a promising mechanisms with host resistance (Schulze-Lefert and Panstruga, strategy for conferring SBR resistance to soybean. Gene donor 2011). Classification of a given plant species as a host or non-host and receiver plant obviously do not need to be closely related, can be difficult because there seems to be a gradual continuum although it is likely that the successful transfer of a protein’s from host to non-host with many intermediate resistances function from one species to another implies conservation or (Bettgenhaeuser et al., 2014). Exploring the molecular basis of this convergence of its physiological environment (e.g., signaling variety of resistances and pyramiding underlying genes and loci networks). Thus, employing phylogenetically related non-hosts in the soybean crop may represent a powerful approach for SBR might further enhance the success of interspecies NHR gene resistance and provide an alternative to chemical fungicides and transfer as a means for SBR resistance. Because P. pachyrhizi traditional breeding. infects many plants, non-hosts to the fungus are rare, especially Arabidopsis and M. truncatula are the best described plants in the legume family of plants. M. truncatula is the only reported in terms of NHR to P. pachyrhizi. Since P. pachyrhizi does leguminous non-host as sporulation of P. pachyrhizi has not not produce macroscopic symptoms on any of 28 wild-type been observed on this plant (Uppalapati et al., 2012; Ishiga accessions tested, Arabidopsis can be considered a true non- et al., 2015). The former authors did a forward genetic screen host for P. pachyrhizi (Loehrer et al., 2008). Although initial to identify M. truncatula mutants with altered resistance to stages of P. pachyrhizi development are identical on Arabidopsis P. pachyrhizi. Because of its diploid genome, M. truncatula is and soybean, proliferation of P. pachyrhizi hyphae into the better suited for forward genetic screening than the allopolyploid leaf mesophyll is rare in Arabidopsis (Loehrer et al., 2008). To soybean crop (Gill et al., 2009). Furthermore, there is highly determine the molecular basis of the preinvasion resistance to conserved microsynteny between soybean and M. truncatula P. pachyrhizi in this plant, Loehrer et al.(2008) used Arabidopsis (Yan et al., 2003). The screen by Uppalapati et al.(2012) mutants with known compromised resistance to other non- identified an inhibitor of rust germ tube differentiation (irg)1 adapted fungal pathogens. Colonization of the mesophyll mutant on which P. pachyrhizi failed to promote preinfection occurred in Arabidopsis penetration mutant pen1, pen2, and pen3. structures. It turned out that the loss of abaxial epicuticular However, despite hyphal growth and rarely observed haustoria wax crystals and the reduced surface hydrophobicity inhibited in the mesophyll of pen mutants, the fungus failed to successfully fungal development on irg1 (Uppalapati et al., 2012). The colonize the plant. It also did not complete its life cycle, indicative mutation was mapped to PALM1 encoding a Cys(2)His(2) of functional postinvasion resistance to P. pachyrhizi in these zinc finger TF controlling the expression of genes involved in mutants. The postinvasion resistance was compromised in the long-chain fatty acid biosynthesis and transport (Uppalapati Arabidopsis triple mutant pen2 pad4 sag101 in which P. pachyrhizi et al., 2012).

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 7 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 8

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

To further investigate the role of surface hydrophobicity SBR. Various stage-specifically expressed fungal genes that may or epicuticular waxes on P. pachyrhizi development, Ishiga represent potential HIGS targets (e.g., genes encoding putative et al.(2013) recorded the fungal transcriptome during effectors like HESPs, kinase family proteins, cell wall degrading germination on a hydrophobic surface (glass slides coated enzymes, metabolism-linked genes, succinate dehydrogenase, with epicuticular wax from wild-type plants and irg1/palm1 etc.) have already been identified in P. pachyrhizi (Posada- mutants) and on the leaf surface of M. truncatula wild-type Buitrago and Frederick, 2005; Stone et al., 2012; Tremblay plants and the irg1/palm1 mutant. They found expression et al., 2012, 2013; Ishiga et al., 2013; Link et al., 2014). Since of kinase family genes was activated on the hydrophobic external application of dsRNAs has proven effective for the surface and on the M. truncatula wild type but not on control of insect pests (Hunter et al., 2012), this approach might irg1/palm1. This result suggested that leaf hydrophobicity present a non-transgenic alternative to HIGS-mediated SBR or epicuticular waxes may trigger expression of P. pachyrhizi control. genes involved in pre-penetration structure formation (Ishiga et al., 2013). Importance of cutin or cuticular waxes to Biocontrol both, germination and appressoria formation has also been In vitro studies and greenhouse and field trials reported reported for other fungal pathogens of plants (Mendoza- protection by beneficial microbes with antagonistic properties Mendoza et al., 2009; Hansjakob et al., 2011; Weidenbach to P. pachyrhizi. The fungus Simplicillium lanosoniveum et al., 2014). Further characterization of the irg1/palm1 preferentially colonizes P. pachyrhizi uredinia on infected mutant may help better understand asymmetric epicuticular soybean leaves and thereby significantly reduces SBR wax loading on leaf surfaces and its importance to plant- development in the field (Ward et al., 2012). Similarly, pathogen interactions. Additionally, identifying IRG1/PALM1 Kumar and Jha(2002) observed hypertrophy and shrinkage orthologues and/or modifying epicuticular wax composition of P. pachyrhizi uredospores when colonized with Trichothecium in soybean might be useful to conferring resistance to rosae. Moreover, several strains of Bacillus spp. reduce SBR P. pachyrhizi. severity (Dorighello et al., 2015). One Bacillus strain that is Transcriptome analysis of the M. truncatula–P. pachyrhizi the active ingredient in the organically approved commercial interaction revealed induction of many genes in the fungicide Ballad R provides SBR control. Besides antagonistic phenylpropanoid, flavonoid, and isoflavonoid pathways (Ishiga organisms, plant volatiles, such as farnesyl-acetate, can be et al., 2015). Accompanying metabolome studies disclosed used for biocontrol of SBR (Mendgen et al., 2006). Same is accumulation of the isoflavonoid derivative medicarpin and true for coffee oil and essential oils from Hyptis marrubioides, its intermediates in P. pachyrhizi-inoculated plants. Because Aloysia gratissima, and Cordia verbenacea which suppressed medicarpin inhibited the germination and differentiation of spore germination in vitro and reduced SBR severity under P. pachyrhizi uredospores in vitro (Ishiga et al., 2015), the greenhouse and/or field conditions (da Silva et al., 2014; phytoalexin might contribute to NHR to P. pachyrhizi in Dorighello et al., 2015). Moreover, acibenzolar-S-methyl M. truncatula. Various studies with P. pachyrhizi hosts also treatment or soil application of silicon reduced SBR severity pointed to a role of phytoalexins in the interaction of plants on soybean leaves (da Cruz et al., 2013). Silicon most likely with the fungus (Chung and Singh, 2008; Lygin et al., 2009). As acts in two ways. First, it establishes a physical penetration the expression of genes in the secondary metabolism is strongly barrier when deposited in the subcuticular layer and second, it affected upon P. pachyrhizi infection in soybean (van de Mortel primes plants for enhanced defense (Ma and Yamaji, 2006; da et al., 2007; Choi et al., 2008; Panthee et al., 2009; Schneider et al., Cruz et al., 2013). Furthermore, soil application of saccharin 2011), secondary metabolites seem to be crucial to both host and shale water were reported to induce SBR resistance in resistance and NHR to SBR. soybean (Srivastava et al., 2011; Mehta et al., 2015). These examples illustrate the potential of SBR biocontrol. However, the RNA Interference and Host-Induced cost-benefit ratio and feasibility of field scale biocontrol needs to be determined to estimate the actual agronomic value of such Gene Silencing approaches. Another option for controlling SBR is by using RNAi to specifically silence essential P. pachyrhizi genes. HIGS, a specific RNAi technique, provided protection from sucking insects, CONCLUSION nematodes, fungi, oomycetes, bacteria, and viruses (Koch and Kogel, 2014). To our knowledge there is not a single report on Phakopsora pachyrhizi is the causal agent of SBR and thus a major the application of HIGS in soybean for fighting SBR or other threat to global soybean production. Novel compounds in the fungal diseases. However, knockdown of nematode genes by SDHI class of fungicides hold promise for successful SBR control siRNAs expressed in soybean was demonstrated (Steeves et al., in the upcoming years, but P. pachyrhizi is likely to become 2006; Li et al., 2010; Niu et al., 2012; Youssef et al., 2013). increasingly insensitive to SDHI action as it has been observed for Moreover, the successful silencing of fungal genes, including DMI and QoI fungicides. Similarly, the SBR resistance conferred those of the rust fungi Puccinia striiformis, P. triticina, and by individual R genes was swiftly overcome in the field, but the P. graminis in other crops (Yin et al., 2010; Panwar et al., 2013) pyramiding (stacking) of known and yet to be identified R genes is testament to the huge potential of this approach for fighting might overcome traditional R gene inefficacy. Exploiting pathway

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 8 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 9

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

components for the major plant defense hormones, SA and AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS JA, seems not to be a realistic option for SBR control because component overexpression often impairs plant growth and yield. CL, RC, SB, and AM contributed various chapters to the article. By contrast, transcription coactivator utilization could have CL composed the review. CL, AM, and UC thoroughly reviewed huge potential but their efficacy for effective SBR control is the consecutive manuscript drafts. still awaiting assessment in both the lab and field. Synthetic biology approaches to engineer R genes and phytoalexin biosynthesis pathways are promising, especially because several FUNDING phytoalexins antagonize P. pachyrhizi both in vitro and in situ. Loss or elimination of S genes also is promising for Work on Phakopsora pachyrhizi-plant interactions in the SBR control but this approach has rarely been followed up. Conrath lab is supported by BASF Plant Science Company Same is true for the exploitation of soybean accessions with GmbH, German Research Foundation (DFG, CO186/10-1), and tolerance or PDR to SBR. Though promising, their potential the Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC). for SBR control is currently unclear. Wild Glycine species, alternative P. pachyrhizi hosts, and especially non-host plants are promising sources of germplasm for SBR resistance while ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AMPs, RNAi/HIGS, and biocontrol approaches hold promise for sustainable soybean production in the future. It seems that We thank Holger Schultheiss for valuable comments on the an integrated approach exploiting different measures is likely manuscript. We also appreciate provision of information by to provide the best possible means for the effective control of Cláudia Vierira Godoy and Francismar Corrêa Marcelino- SBR. Guimarães.

REFERENCES Bilgin, D., de Lucia, E. H., Zangerl, A. R., and Singh, R. J. (2009). Plant-Derived Biofungicide Against Soybean Rust Disease. U.S. Provisional Patent Application Alves, M. S., Soares, Z. G., Vidigal, P. M. P., Barros, E. G., Poddanosqui, A. M. P., No 12/370,373. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. Aoyagi, L. N., et al. (2015). Differential expression of four soybean bZIP genes Boerjan, W., Ralph, J., and Baucher, M. (2003). Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. during Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection. Funct. Integr. Genomics 15, 685–696. Plant Biol. 54, 519–546. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.54.031902.134938 doi: 10.1007/s10142-015-0445-0 Bolon, Y., Stec, A. O., Michno, J., Roessler, J., Bhaskar, P. B., Ries, L., Aoyagi, L. N., Lopes-Caitar, V. S., de Carvalho, M. C. C. G., Darben, L. M., Polizel- et al. (2014). Genome resilience and prevalence of segmental duplications Podanosqui, A., Kuwahara, M. K., et al. (2014). Genomic and transcriptomic following fast neutron irradiation of soybean. Genetics 198, 967–981. doi: characterization of the transcription factor family R2R3-MYB in soybean and 10.1534/genetics.114.170340 its involvement in the resistance responses to Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Plant Sci. Bolon, Y.-T., Haun, W. J., Xu, W. W., Grant, D., Stacey, M. G., Nelson, R. T., et al. 229, 32–42. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.08.005 (2011). Phenotypic and genomic analyses of a fast neutron mutant population Arias, C. A. A., Toledo, J. F. F., Almeida, L. A., Pipolo, G. E. S., Carneiro, resource in soybean. Plant Physiol. 156, 240–253. doi: 10.1104/pp.110.170811 R. V., Abdelnoor, R. V., et al. (2008). “Asian rust in Brazil: varietal Bonde, M. R., Nester, S. E., Moore, W. F., and Allen, T. W. (2009). Comparative resistance,” in Facing the Challenge of Soybean Rust in South America, eds susceptibility of kudzu accessions from the southeastern United States to H. Kudo, K. Suenaga, R. M. S. Soares, and A. Toledo (Tsukuba: JIRCAS), infection by Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Plant Dis. 93, 593–598. doi: 10.1094/PDIS- 29–30. 93-6-0593 Atamian, H. S., Eulgem, T., and Kaloshian, I. (2012). SlWRKY70 is required for Mi- Bowling, S. A., Guo, A., Cao, H., Gordon, A. S., Klessig, D. F., and Dong, X. (1994). 1-mediated resistance to aphids and nematodes in tomato. Planta 235, 299–309. A mutation in Arabidopsis that leads to constitutive expression of systemic doi: 10.1007/s00425-011-1509-6 acquired resistance. Plant Cell 6, 1845–1857. doi: 10.1105/tpc.6.12.1845 Bai, Y., van der Hulst, R., Bonnema, G., Marcel, T. C., Meijer-Dekens, F., Niks, Bradley, C. A. (2007). “Fungicide resistance management in soybean,” in Using R. E., et al. (2005). Tomato defense to Oidium neolycopersici: dominant Ol Foliar Fungicides to Manage Soybean Rust, eds A. E. Dorrance, M. A. Draper, genes confer isolate-dependent resistance via a different mechanism than and D. E. Hershman (Columbus, OH: Land-Grant Universities Cooperating recessive ol-2. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 18, 354–362. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18- NCERA-208 and OMAF), 57–60. 0354 Brand, G. D., Magalhães, M. T. Q., Tinoco, M. L. P., Aragão, F. J. L., Nicoli, J., Barbosa, G. F., da Cruz Centurion, M. A. P., Marin, B. T., and Barbosa, G. F. (2013). Kelly, S. M., et al. (2012). Probing protein sequences as sources for encrypted Effect of reduced fungicide doses on control of soybean Asian rust and bean antimicrobial peptides. PLoS ONE 7:e45848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045848 yield. Interciencia 38, 347–352. Brent, K. J., and Holloman, D. W. (2007). Fungicide Resistance in Crop Pathogens: Bencke-Malato, M., Cabreira, C., Wiebke-Strohm, B., Bücker-Neto, L., Mancini, E., How Can It Be Managed? Brussels: CropLife International. Osorio, M. B., et al. (2014). Genome-wide annotation of the soybean WRKY Bromfield, K. R. (1984). Soybean Rust. St. Paul, MN: American Phytopathological family and functional characterization of genes involved in response to Society. Phakopsora pachyrhizi infection. BMC Plant Biol. 14:236. doi: 10.1186/s12870- Bromfield, K. R., and Hartwig, E. E. (1980). Resistance to soybean rust 014-0236-0 (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) and mode of inheritance. Crop Sci. 20, 254–255. doi: Bettgenhaeuser, J., Gilbert, B., Ayliffe, M., and Moscou, M. J. (2014). Nonhost 10.1071/AR9800951 resistance to rust pathogens – a continuation of continua. Front. Plant Sci. 5:664. Bromfield, K. R., and Melching, J. S. (1982). Sources of specific resistance to doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00664 soybean rust. Phytopathology 72:706. Bhor, T. J., Chimote, V. P., and Deshmukh, M. P. (2014). Inheritance of rust Burdon, J. J. (1987). Phenotypic and genetic patterns of resistance to the pathogen (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) resistance in soybean. J. Food Legum 27, 177–185. doi: Phakopsora pachyrhizi in populations of Glycine canescens. Oecologia 73, 257– 10.4238/2014.July.25.18 267. doi: 10.1007/BF00377516 Bhor, T. J., Chimote, V. P., and Deshmukh, M. P. (2015). Molecular tagging Burdon, J. J. (1988). Major gene resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in Glycine of Asiatic soybean rust resistance in exotic genotype EC 241780 reveals canescens, a wild relative of soybean. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75, 923–928. doi: complementation of two genes. Plant Breed. 134, 70–77. doi: 10.1111/pbr.12240 10.1007/BF00258055

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 9 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 10

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

Burdon, J. J., and Speer, S. S. (1984). A set of differential Glycine hosts for the Francis, D. M., Merk, H. L., and Namuth-Covert, D. (2012). identification of races of Phakopsora pachyrhizi Syd. Euphytica 33, 891–896. doi: Gene pyramiding using molecular markers. Plant Breed. Genomics. Available at: 10.1007/BF00021917 http://articles.extension.org/pages/32465/gene-pyramiding-using-molecular- Büschges, R., Hollricher, K., Panstruga, R., Simons, G., Wolter, M., Frijters, A., markers et al. (1997). The barley Mlo gene: a novel control element of plant pathogen Fu, Z. Q., and Dong, X. (2013). Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection resistance. Cell 88, 695–705. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81912-1 into global defense. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 64, 839–863. doi: 10.1146/annurev- Calvo, ÉS., Kiihl, R. A. S., Garcia, A., Harada, A., and Hiromoto, D. M. (2008). Two arplant-042811-105606 major recessive soybean genes conferring soybean rust resistance. Crop Sci. 48, Garcia, A., Calvo, E. S., de Souza Kiihl, R. A., Harada, A., Hiromoto, D. M., 1350–1354. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2007.10.0589 and Vieira, L. G. (2008). Molecular mapping of soybean rust (Phakopsora Campe, R., Loehrer, M., Conrath, U., and Goellner, K. (2014). Phakopsora pachyrhizi) resistance genes: discovery of a novel locus and alleles. Theor. Appl. pachyrhizi induces defense marker genes to necrotrophs in Arabidopsis Genet. 117, 545–553. doi: 10.1007/s00122-008-0798-z thaliana. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. 87, 1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.pmpp.2014.04.005 Gawehns, F., Cornelissen, B. J. C., and Takken, F. L. W. (2013). The potential of Cannon, S. B., and Shoemaker, R. C. (2012). Evolutionary and comparative effector-target genes in breeding for plant innate immunity. Microb. Biotechnol. analyses of the soybean genome. Breed. Sci. 61, 437–444. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs. 6, 223–229. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12023 61.437 Giannakopoulou, A., Steele, J. F. C., Segretin, M. E., Bozkurt, T., Zhou, J., Cao, H., Li, X., and Dong, X. (1998). Generation of broad-spectrum disease Robatzek, S., et al. (2015). Tomato I2 immune receptor can be engineered to resistance by overexpression of an essential regulatory gene in systemic confer partial resistance to the oomycete Phytophthora infestans in addition to acquired resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 6531–6536. doi: the fungus Fusarium oxysporum. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 27, 624–637. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6531 10.1094/MPMI-07-15-0147-R Chang, Y. C., Nair, M. G., and Nitiss, J. L. (1995). Metabolites of daidzein Gill, N., Findley, S., Walling, J. G., Hans, C., Ma, J., Doyle, J., et al. (2009). Molecular and genistein and their biological activities. J. Nat. Prod. 58, 1901–1905. doi: and chromosomal evidence for allopolyploidy in soybean. Plant Physiol. 151, 10.1021/np50126a016 1167–1174. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.137935 Chen, X.-K., Zhang, J.-Y., Zhang, Z., Du, X.-L., Du, B.-B., and Qu, S.-C. (2012). Godoy, C. V. (2011). “Phakopsora pachyrhizi: the performance of soybean rust Overexpressing MhNPR1 in transgenic Fuji apples enhances resistance to apple fungicides over years and regions in Brazil,” in Modern Fungicides and powdery mildew. Mol. Biol. Rep. 39, 8083–8089. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012- Antifungal Compounds VI, eds H. W. Dehne, H. B. Deising, U. Gisi, K. H. 1655-3 Kuck, P. E. Russell, and H. Lyr (Braunschweig: Deutsche Phytomedizinische Chern, M., Fitzgerald, H. A., Canlas, P. E., Navarre, D. A., and Ronald, P. C. Gesellschaft e.V. Selbstverlag), 203–209. (2005). Overexpression of a rice NPR1 homolog leads to constitutive activation Godoy, C. V. (2012). “Risk and management of fungicide resistance in the Asian of defense response and hypersensitivity to light. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. soybean rust fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi,” in Fungicide Resistance in Crop 18, 511–520. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-18-0511 Protection: Risk and Management, ed. T. S. Thind (Wallingford: CABI), 87–95. Chiang, H. S., and Norris, D. M. (1983). Phenolic and tannin contents as related to doi: 10.1079/9781845939052.0000 anatomical parameters of soybean resistance to agromyzid bean flies. J. Agric. Godoy, C. V., Bueno, A. F., and Gazziero, D. L. P. (2015). Brazilian soybean pest Food Chem. 31, 726–730. doi: 10.1021/jf00118a012 management and threats to its sustainability. Outlooks Pest Manag. 26, 113–117. Choi, J. J., Alkharouf, N. W., Schneider, K. T., Matthews, B. F., and Frederick, R. D. doi: 10.1564/v26_jun_06 (2008). Expression patterns in soybean resistant to Phakopsora pachyrhizi reveal Goellner, K., Loehrer, M., Langenbach, C., Conrath, U., Koch, E., and the importance of peroxidases and lipoxygenases. Funct. Integr. Genomics 8, Schaffrath, U. (2010). Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the causal agent of Asian 341–359. doi: 10.1007/s10142-008-0080-0 soybean rust. Mol. Plant Pathol. 11, 169–177. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009. Chung, G., and Singh, R. J. (2008). Broadening the genetic base of soybean: 00589.x a multidisciplinary approach. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 27, 295–341. doi: Grasso, V., Palermo, S., Sierotzki, H., Garibaldi, A., and Gisi, U. (2006a). 10.1080/07352680802333904 Cytochrome b gene structure and consequences for resistance to Qo Cooper, B., Campbell, K. B., Feng, J., Garrett, W. M., and Frederick, R. (2011). inhibitor fungicides in plant pathogens. Pest Manag. Sci. 62, 465–472. doi: Nuclear proteomic changes linked to soybean rust resistance. Mol. Biosyst. 7, 10.1002/ps.1236 773–783. doi: 10.1039/C0MB00171F Grasso, V., Sierotzki, H., Garibaldi, A., and Gisi, U. (2006b). Characterization Cooper, B., Campbell, K. B., McMahon, M. B., and Luster, D. G. (2013). Disruption of the cytochrome b gene fragment of Puccinia species responsible for the of Rpp1-mediated soybean rust immunity by virus-induced gene silencing. binding site of QoI fungicides. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 84, 72–82. doi: Plant Signal. Behav. 8:e27543. doi: 10.4161/psb.27543 10.1016/j.pestbp.2005.05.005 Cooper, J. L., Till, B. J., Laport, R. G., Darlow, M. C., Kleffner, J. M., Jamai, A., et al. Grasso, V., Sierotzki, H., Garibaldi, A., and Gisi, U. (2006c). Relatedness among (2008). TILLING to detect induced mutations in soybean. BMC Plant Biol. 8:9. agronomically important rusts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b gene and doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-8-9 ribosomal ITS sequences. J. Phytopathol. 154, 110–118. doi: 10.1111/j.1439- da Cruz, M. F. A., Rodrigues, F. Á, Polanco, L. R., da Silva Curvêlo, C. R., 0434.2006.01070.x Nascimento, K. J. T., Moreira, M. A., et al. (2013). Inducers of resistance and Guicherit, E., Bartlett, D., Dale, S. M., Haas, H. U., Scalliet, G., Walter, H., et al. silicon on the activity of defense enzymes in the soybean-Phakopsora pachyrhizi (2014). “Solatenol-the second generation benzonorbornene SDHI carboxamide interaction. Bragantia 72, 162–172. doi: 10.1590/S0006-870520130050 with outstanding performance against key crop diseases,” in Modern Fungicides 00025 and Antifungal Compounds VII, eds H. W. Dehne, H. B. Deising, B. Fraaije, U. da Silva, A. C., de Souza, P. E., Amaral, D. C., Zeviani, W. M., and Pinto, J. E. B. P. Gisi, D. Hermann, A. Mehl, et al. (Braunschweig: Deutsche Phytomedizinische (2014). Essential oils from Hyptis marrubioides, Aloysia gratissima and Cordia Gesellschaft e.V. Selbstverlag), 67–72. verbenacea reduce the progress of Asian soybean rust. Acta Sci. Agron. 36, Hahlbrock, K., and Scheel, D. (1989). Physiology and molecular biology of 159–166. doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v36i2.17441 phenylpropanoid metabolism. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 40, Dixon, R. A., Achnine, L., Kota, P., Liu, C.-J., Reddy, M. S. S., and Wang, L. (2002). 347–369. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.40.060189.002023 The phenylpropanoid pathway and plant defence-a genomics perspective. Mol. Hansjakob, A., Riederer, M., and Hildebrandt, U. (2011). Wax matters: absence of Plant Pathol. 3, 371–390. doi: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2002.00131.x very-long-chain aldehydes from the leaf cuticular wax of the glossy11 mutant of Dorighello, D. V., Bettiol, W., Maia, N. B., and de Campos Leite, R. M. V. B. (2015). maize compromises the prepenetration processes of Blumeria graminis. Plant Controlling Asian soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) with Bacillus spp. and Pathol. 60, 1151–1161. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02467.x coffee oil. Crop Prot. 67, 59–65. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2014.09.017 Hartman, G. L., Frederick, R. D., and Miles, M. R. (2005). Breeding for resistance Falk, A., Feys, B. J., Frost, L. N., Jones, J. D. G., Daniels, M. J., and Parker, J. E. to soybean rust. Plant Dis. 89, 664–666. doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0664 (1999). EDS1, an essential component of R gene-mediated disease resistance in Hartwig, E., and Bromfield, K. (1983). Relationships among three genes Arabidopsis has homology to eukaryotic lipases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, conferring specific resistance to rust in soybeans. Crop Sci. 23, 237–239. doi: 3292–3297. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.6.3292 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300020012x

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 10 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 11

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

Hartwig, E. E. (1986). Identification of a fourth major gene application, and its effect on sensitivity. Plant Pathol. 63, 640–650. doi: conferring resistance to soybean rust. Crop Sci. 26, 1135–1136. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12120 10.2135/cropsci1986.0011183X002600060010x Lemos, N. G., de Lucca e Braccini, A., Abdelnoor, R. V., de Oliveira, M. C. N., Humphry, M., Consonni, C., and Panstruga, R. (2006). mlo-based powdery mildew Suenaga, K., and Yamanaka, N. (2011). Characterization of genes Rpp2, immunity: silver bullet or simply non-host resistance? Mol. Plant Pathol. 7, Rpp4, and Rpp5 for resistance to soybean rust. Euphytica 182, 53–64. doi: 605–610. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2006.00362.x 10.1007/s10681-011-0465-3 Hunter, W. B., Glick, E., Paldi, N., and Bextine, B. R. (2012). Advances in Li, J., Todd, T. C., Oakley, T. R., Lee, J., and Trick, H. N. (2010). Host-derived RNA interference: dsRNA treatment in trees and grapevines for insect pest suppression of nematode reproductive and fitness genes decreases fecundity suppression. Southwest. Entomol. 37, 85–87. doi: 10.3958/059.037.0110 of Heterodera glycines Ichinohe. Planta 232, 775–785. doi: 10.1007/s00425-010- Ishiga, Y., Rao Uppalapati, S., Gill, U. S., Huhman, D., Tang, Y., and Mysore, 1209-7 K. S. (2015). Transcriptomic and metabolomic analyses identify a role for Li, S., Smith, J. R., Ray, J. D., and Frederick, R. D. (2012). Identification of a new chlorophyll catabolism and phytoalexin during Medicago nonhost resistance soybean rust resistance gene in PI 567102B. Theor. Appl. Genet. 125, 133–142. against Asian soybean rust. Sci. Rep. 5:13061. doi: 10.1038/srep13061 doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1821-y Ishiga, Y., Uppalapati, S. R., and Mysore, K. S. (2013). Expression analysis Li, X., Clarke, J. D., Zhang, Y., and Dong, X. (2001). Activation of an EDS1- reveals a role for hydrophobic or epicuticular wax signals in pre-penetration mediated R -gene pathway in the snc1 mutant leads to constitutive, NPR1- structure formation of Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Plant Signal. Behav. 8:e26959. independent pathogen resistance. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 14, 1131–1139. doi: 10.4161/psb.26959 doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2001.14.10.1131 Jacobs, T. B., LaFayette, P. R., Schmitz, R. J., and Parrott, W. A. (2015). Targeted Link, T. I., Lang, P., Scheffler, B. E., Duke, M. V., Graham, M. A., Cooper, B., genome modifications in soybean with CRISPR/Cas9. BMC Biotechnol. 15:16. et al. (2014). The haustorial transcriptomes of Uromyces appendiculatus and doi: 10.1186/s12896-015-0131-2 Phakopsora pachyrhizi and their candidate effector families. Mol. Plant. Pathol. Jarosz, A. M., and Burdon, J. J. (1990). Predominance of a single major gene for 15, 379–393. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12099 resistance to Phakopsora pachyrhizi in a population of Glycine argyrea. Heredity Lipka, V., Dittgen, J., Bednarek, P., Bhat, R., Wiermer, M., Stein, M., 64, 347–353. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1990.43 et al. (2005). Pre- and postinvasion defenses both contribute to nonhost Jirage, D., Tootle, T. L., Reuber, T. L., Frost, L. N., Feys, B. J., Parker, J. E., et al. resistance in Arabidopsis. Science 310, 1180–1183. doi: 10.1126/science.11 (1999). Arabidopsis thaliana PAD4 encodes a lipase-like gene that is important 19409 for salicylic acid signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 96, 13583–13588. doi: Loehrer, M., Langenbach, C., Goellner, K., Conrath, U., and Schaffrath, U. (2008). 10.1073/pnas.96.23.13583 Characterization of nonhost resistance of Arabidopsis to the Asian soybean Jordan, S. A., Mailhot, D. J., Gevens, A. J., Marois, J. J., Wright, D. L., Harmon, C. L., rust. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 21, 1421–1430. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-11- et al. (2010). Characterization of kudzu (Pueraria spp.) resistance to Phakopsora 1421 pachyrhizi, the causal agent of soybean rust. Phytopathology 100, 941–948. doi: Loehrer, M., and Schaffrath, U. (2011). “Asian soybean rust – meet a prominent 10.1094/PHYTO-100-9-0941 challenge in soybean cultivation,” in Soybean - Biochemistry, Chemistry and Kang, B.-C., Yeam, I., Frantz, J. D., Murphy, J. F., and Jahn, M. M. (2005). Physiology, ed. T. -B. Ng (Rijeka: InTech), 83–100. doi: 10.5772/15651 The pvr1 locus in Capsicum encodes a translation initiation factor eIF4E that Loehrer, M., Vogel, A., Huettel, B., Reinhardt, R., Benes, V., Duplessis, S., et al. interacts with Tobacco etch virus VPg. Plant J. 42, 392–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- (2014). On the current status of Phakopsora pachyrhizi genome sequencing. 313X.2005.02381.x Front. Plant Sci. 5:377. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00377 Kendrick, M. D., Harris, D. K., Ha, B.-K., Hyten, D. L., Cregan, P. B., Frederick, Long, J., Holland, J. B., Munkvold, G. P., and Jannink, J.-L. (2006). Responses to R. D., et al. (2011). Identification of a second Asian soybean rust resistance gene selection for partial resistance to crown rust in oat. Crop Sci. 46, 1260–1265. in Hyuuga soybean. Phytopathology 101, 535–543. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-09-10- doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.06-0169 0257 Lozano-Torres, J. L., Wilbers, R. H. P., Gawronski, P., Boshoven, J. C., Finkers- Kim, Y.-S., Dixon, E. W., Vincelli, P., and Farman, M. L. (2003). Field resistance Tomczak, A., Cordewener, J. H. G., et al. (2012). Dual disease resistance to strobilurin (QoI) fungicides in Pyricularia grisea caused by mutations mediated by the immune receptor Cf-2 in tomato requires a common virulence in the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Phytopathology 93, 891–900. doi: target of a fungus and a nematode. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 10119– 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.7.891 10124. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202867109 Klosowski, A. C., May De Mio, L. L., Miessner, S., Rodrigues, R., and Stammler, G. Lygin, A. V., Li, S., Vittal, R., Widholm, J. M., Hartman, G. L., and Lozovaya, (2015). Detection of the F129L mutation in the cytochrome b gene in V. V. (2009). The importance of phenolic metabolism to limit the growth of Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Pest Manag. Sci. 72, 1211–1215. doi: 10.1002/ps.4099 Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Phytopathology 99, 1412–1420. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO- Koch, A., and Kogel, K. (2014). New wind in the sails: improving the agronomic 99-12-1412 value of crop plants through RNAi-mediated gene silencing. Plant Biotechnol. J. Lyngkjær, M. F., Newton, A. C., Atzema, J. L., and Baker, S. J. (2000). The 12, 821–831. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12226 barley mlo-gene: an important powdery mildew resistance source. Agronomy Kretschmer, M., Leroch, M., Mosbach, A., Walker, A.-S., Fillinger, S., Mernke, D., 20, 745–756. doi: 10.1051/agro:2000173 et al. (2009). Fungicide-driven evolution and molecular basis of multidrug Ma, J. F., and Yamaji, N. (2006). Silicon uptake and accumulation in higher plants. resistance in field populations of the grey mould fungus Botrytis cinerea. PLoS Trends Plant Sci. 11, 392–397. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.06.007 Pathog. 5:e1000696. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000696 Maltby, L., Brock, T. C. M., and van den Brink, P. J. (2009). Fungicide risk Kumar, S., and Jha, D. K. (2002). Trichothecium roseum: a potential agent for the assessment for aquatic ecosystems: importance of interspecific variation, toxic biological control of soybean rust. Indian Phytopathol. 55, 232–234. mode of action, and exposure regime. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 7556–7563. doi: La Camera, S., Gouzerh, G., Dhondt, S., Hoffmann, L., Fritig, B., Legrand, M., et al. 10.1021/es901461c (2004). Metabolic reprogramming in plant innate immunity: the contributions Maphosa, M., Talwana, H., and Tukamuhabwa, P. (2012). Enhancing soybean rust of phenylpropanoid and oxylipin pathways. Immunol. Rev. 198, 267–284. doi: resistance through Rpp2, Rpp3 and Rpp4 pair wise gene pyramiding. African J. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.0129.x Agric. Res. 7, 4271–4277. doi: 10.5897/AJAR12.1123 Langenbach, C., Campe, R., Schaffrath, U., Goellner, K., and Conrath, U. (2013). Mathieu, M., Winters, E. K., Kong, F., Wan, J., Wang, S., Eckert, H., et al. UDP-glucosyltransferase UGT84A2/BRT1 is required for Arabidopsis nonhost (2009). Establishment of a soybean (Glycine max Merr. L) transposon-based resistance to the Asian soybean rust pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi. New mutagenesis repository. Planta 229, 279–289. doi: 10.1007/s00425-008-0827-9 Phytol. 198, 536–545. doi: 10.1111/nph.12155 McDonald, B. A. (2014). Using dynamic diversity to achieve durable disease Langenbach, C., Schultheiss, H., Rosendahl, M., Tresch, N., Conrath, U., and resistance in agricultural ecosystems. Trop. Plant Pathol. 39, 191–196. doi: Goellner, K. (2016). Interspecies gene transfer provides soybean resistance to 10.1590/S1982-56762014000300001 a fungal pathogen. Plant Biotechnol. J. 14, 699–708. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12418 McDonald, B. A., and Linde, C. (2002). Pathogen population genetics, evolutionary Leiminger, J. H., Adolf, B., and Hausladen, H. (2014). Occurrence of the F129L potential, and durable resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 40, 349–379. doi: mutation in Alternaria solani populations in Germany in response to QoI 10.1146/annurev.phyto.40.120501.101443

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 11 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 12

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

McLean, R. J., and Byth, D. E. (1980). Inheritance of resistance to rust Pierozzi, P. H. B., Ribeiro, A. S., Moreira, J. U. V., Laperuta, L. D. C., Rachid, B. F., (Phakopsora pachyrhizi) in soybeans. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 31, 951–956. doi: Lima, W. F., et al. (2008). New soybean (Glycine max Fabales, Fabaceae) sources 10.1071/AR9800951 of qualitative genetic resistance to Asian soybean rust caused by Phakopsora Mehta, Y. R., Marangoni, M. S., Matos, J. N., Mandarino, J. M. G., and Galbieri, R. pachyrhizi (Uredinales, Phakopsoraceae). Genet. Mol. Biol. 31, 505–511. doi: (2015). Systemic acquired resistance of soybean to soybean rust induced by 10.1590/S1415-47572008000300018 shale water. Am. J. Plant Sci. 6, 2249–2256. doi: 10.4236/ajps.2015.614227 Pieterse, C. M. J., van der Does, D., Zamioudis, C., Leon-Reyes, A., and van Wees, Mendgen, K., Wirsel, S. G. R., Jux, A., Hoffmann, J., and Boland, W. (2006). S. C. M. (2012). Hormonal modulation of plant immunity. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Volatiles modulate the development of plant pathogenic rust fungi. Planta 224, Biol. 28, 489–521. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154055 1353–1361. doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0320-2 Posada-Buitrago, M. L., and Frederick, R. D. (2005). Expressed sequence tag Mendoza-Mendoza, A., Berndt, P., Djamei, A., Weise, C., Linne, U., Marahiel, M., analysis of the soybean rust pathogen Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Fungal Genet. Biol. et al. (2009). Physical-chemical plant-derived signals induce differentiation 42, 949–962. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.06.004 in Ustilago maydis. Mol. Microbiol. 71, 895–911. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- Rahnamaeian, M. (2011). Antimicrobial peptides: modes of mechanism, 2958.2008.06567.x modulation of defense responses. Plant Signal. Behav. 6, 1325–1332. doi: Meyer, J. D. F., Silva, D. C. G., Yang, C., Pedley, K. F., Zhang, C., van de Mortel, M., 10.4161/psb.6.9.16319 et al. (2009). Identification and analyses of candidate genes for Rpp4-mediated Reis, E. M., Deuner, E., Zanatta, M., Reis, E. M., Deuner, E., and Zanatta, M. (2015). resistance to Asian soybean rust in soybean. Plant Physiol. 150, 295–307. doi: In vivo sensitivity of Phakopsora pachyrhizi to DMI and QoI fungicides. Summa 10.1104/pp.108.134551 Phytopathol. 41, 21–24. doi: 10.1590/0100-5405/1975 Miles, M. R., Pastor-Corrales, M. A., Hartman, G. L., and Frederick, R. D. (2007). Salomon, D., and Sessa, G. (2012). “Biotechnological strategies for engineering Differential response of common bean cultivars to Phakopsora pachyrhizi. Plant plants with durable resistance to fungal and bacterial pathogens,” in Plant Dis. 91, 698–704. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-91-6-0698 Biotechnology and Agriculture -Prospects for the 21st Century-, eds A. Altman Monteros, M. J., Missaoui, A. M., Phillips, D. V., Walker, D. R., and Boerma, and P. M. Hasegawa (Cambridge, MS: Academic Press), 329–342. doi: H. R. (2007). Mapping and confirmation of the “Hyuuga” red-brown 10.1016/B978-0-12-381466-1.00021-3 lesion resistance gene for Asian soybean rust. Crop Sci. 47, 829–834. doi: Scherm, H., Christiano, R. S. C., Esker, P. D., Del Ponte, E. M., and Godoy, 10.2135/cropsci06.07.0462 C. V. (2009). Quantitative review of fungicide efficacy trials for managing Morales, A. M. A. P., O’Rourke, J. A., van de Mortel, M., Scheider, K. T., Bancroft, soybean rust in Brazil. Crop Prot. 28, 774–782. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2009. T. J., Borém, A., et al. (2013). Transcriptome analyses and virus induced gene 05.006 silencing identify genes in the Rpp4-mediated Asian soybean rust resistance Schmitz, H. K., Medeiros, C.-A., Craig, I. R., and Stammler, G. (2014). Sensitivity of pathway. Funct. Plant Biol. 40, 1029–1047. doi: 10.1071/FP12296 Phakopsora pachyrhizi towards quinone-outside-inhibitors and demethylation- Mueller, A. N., Ziemann, S., Treitschke, S., Aßmann, D., and Doehlemann, G. inhibitors, and corresponding resistance mechanisms. Pest Manag. Sci. 70, (2013). Compatibility in the Ustilago maydis–maize interaction requires 378–388. doi: 10.1002/ps.3562 inhibition of host cysteine proteases by the fungal effector Pit2. PLoS Pathog. Schneider, K. T., van de Mortel, M., Bancroft, T. J., Braun, E., Nettleton, D., 9:e1003177. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003177 Nelson, R. T., et al. (2011). Biphasic gene expression changes elicited Mueller, T. A., Miles, M. R., Morel, W., Marois, J. J., Wright, D. L., Kemerait, by Phakopsora pachyrhizi in soybean correlates with fungal penetration R. C., et al. (2009). Effect of fungicide and timing of application on soybean and haustoria formation. Plant Physiol. 157, 355–371. doi: 10.1104/pp.111. rust severity and yield. Plant Dis. 93, 243–248. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-93-3-0243 181149 Narusaka, M., Shirasu, K., Noutoshi, Y., Kubo, Y., Shiraishi, T., Iwabuchi, M., Schulze-Lefert, P., and Panstruga, R. (2011). A molecular evolutionary concept et al. (2009). RRS1 and RPS4 provide a dual resistance-gene system against connecting nonhost resistance, pathogen host range, and pathogen speciation. fungal and bacterial pathogens. Plant J. 60, 218–226. doi: 10.1111/j.1365- Trends Plant Sci. 16, 117–125. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.01.001 313X.2009.03949.x Segretin, M. E., Pais, M., Franceschetti, M., Chaparro-garcia, A., Bos, J. I. B., Nawrath, C., Heck, S., Parinthawong, N., and Metraux, J. P. (2002). EDS5, an Banfield, M. J., et al. (2014). Single amino acid mutations in the potato immune essential component of salicylic acid-dependent signaling for disease resistance receptor R3a expand response to Phytophthora effectors. Mol. Plant Microbe in Arabidopsis, is a member of the MATE transporter family. Plant Cell 14, Interact. 27, 624–637. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-02-14-0040-R 275–286. doi: 10.1105/tpc.010376 Sierotzki, H., Frey, R., Wullschleger, J., Palermo, S., Karlin, S., Godwin, J., et al. Niu, J., Jian, H., Xu, J., Chen, C., Guo, Q., Liu, Q., et al. (2012). RNAi silencing of (2007). Cytochrome b gene sequence and structure of Pyrenophora teres and the Meloidogyne incognita Rpn7 gene reduces nematode parasitic success. Eur. P. tritici-repentis and implications for QoI resistance. Pest Manag. Sci. 63, J. Plant Pathol. 134, 131–144. doi: 10.10007/s10658-012-9971-y 225–233. doi: 10.1002/ps.1330 Nombela, G., Williamson, V. M., and Muñiz, M. (2003). The root-knot nematode Sierotzki, H., and Scalliet, G. (2013). A review of current knowledge of resistance resistance gene Mi-1.2 of tomato is responsible for resistance against the aspects for the next-generation succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor fungicides. whitefly Bemisia tabaci. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 16, 645–649. doi: Phytopathology 103, 880–887. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-13-0009-RVW 10.1094/MPMI.2003.16.7.645 Singh, R. J., and Nelson, R. L. (2015). Intersubgeneric hybridization between Oliver, R. P. (2014). A reassessment of the risk of rust fungi developing resistance Glycine max and G. tomentella: production of F1, amphidiploid, BC1, BC2, to fungicides. Pest Manag. Sci. 70, 1641–1645. doi: 10.1002/ps.3767 BC3, and fertile soybean plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 128, 1117–1136. doi: Pandey, A. K., Yang, C., Zhang, C., Graham, M. A., Horstman, H. D., Lee, Y., 10.1007/s00122-015-2494-0 et al. (2011). Functional analysis of the Asian soybean rust resistance Slaminko, T. L., Miles, M. R., Frederick, R. D., Bonde, M. R., and Hartman, pathway mediated by Rpp2. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24, 194–206. doi: G. L. (2008). New legume hosts of Phakopsora pachyrhizi based on greenhouse 10.1094/MPMI-08-10-0187 evaluations. Plant Dis. 92, 767–771. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-5-0767 Panthee, D. R., Marois, J. J., Wright, D. L., Narváez, D., Yuan, J. S., and Stewart, Soria-Guerra, R. E., Rosales-Mendoza, S., Chang, S., Haudenshield, J. S., C. N. (2009). Differential expression of genes in soybean in response to the Padmanaban, A., Rodriguez-Zas, S., et al. (2010). Transcriptome analysis of causal agent of Asian soybean rust (Phakopsora pachyrhizi Sydow) is soybean resistant and susceptible genotypes of Glycine tomentella during Phakopsora growth stage-specific. Theor. Appl. Genet. 118, 359–370. doi: 10.1007/s00122- pachyrhizi infection reveals novel rust resistance genes. Theor. Appl. Genet. 120, 008-0905-1 1315–1333. doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1258-0 Panwar, V., McCallum, B., and Bakkeren, G. (2013). Endogenous silencing of Souza, T. L. P. O., Dessaune, S. N., Moreira, M. A., and Barros, E. G. (2014). Puccinia triticina pathogenicity genes through in planta-expressed sequences Soybean rust resistance sources and inheritance in the common bean (Phaseolus leads to the suppression of rust diseases on wheat. Plant J. 73, 521–532. doi: vulgaris L.). Genet. Mol. Res. 13, 5626–5636. doi: 10.4238/2014.July.25.18 10.1111/tpj.12047 Srivastava, P., George, S., Marois, J. J., Wright, D. L., and Walker, D. R. (2011). Pavan, S., Jacobsen, E., Visser, R. G. F., and Bai, Y. (2010). Loss of susceptibility as a Saccharin-induced systemic acquired resistance against rust (Phakopsora novel breeding strategy for durable and broad-spectrum resistance. Mol. Breed. pachyrhizi) infection in soybean: effects on growth and development. Crop Prot. 25, 1–12. doi: 10.1007/s11032-009-9323-6 30, 726–732. doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2011.02.023

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 12 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797 fpls-07-00797 June 4, 2016 Time: 11:44 # 13

Langenbach et al. Fighting Asian Soybean Rust

Steeves, R. M., Todd, T. C., Essig, J. S., and Trick, H. N. (2006). Transgenic soybeans Wightwick, A., Walters, R., Allinson, G., Reichman, S., and Menzies, N. (2010). expressing siRNAs specific to a major sperm protein gene suppress Heterodera “Environmental risks of fungicides used in horticultural production systems,” glycines reproduction. Funct. Plant Biol. 33, 991–999. doi: 10.1071/FP06130 in Fungicides, ed. O. Carisse (Rijeka: InTech), 273–304. Stone, C. L., McMahon, M. B., Fortis, L. L., Nuñez, A., Smythers, G. W., Luster, Xie, K., Zhang, J., and Yang, Y. (2014). Genome-wide prediction of highly D. G., et al. (2012). Gene expression and proteomic analysis of the formation of specific guide RNA spacers for CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in Phakopsora pachyrhizi appressoria. BMC Genomics 13:269. doi: 10.1186/1471- model plants and major crops. Mol. Plant 7, 923–926. doi: 10.1093/mp/ 2164-13-269 ssu009 Sun, J. H., Li, Z., Jewett, D. K., Britton, K. O., Ye, W. H., and Ge, X. (2005). Yamanaka, N., Lemos, N. G., Uno, M., Akamatsu, H., Yamaoka, Y., Abdelnoor, Genetic diversity of Pueraria lobata (kudzu ) and closely related taxa as R. V., et al. (2013). Resistance to Asian soybean rust in soybean lines with revealed by inter-simple sequence repeat analysis. Weed Res. 45, 255–260. doi: the pyramided three Rpp genes. Crop Breed. Appl. Biotechnol. 13, 75–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.2005.00462.x 10.1590/S1984-70332013000100009 Tremblay, A., Hosseini, P., Li, S., Alkharouf, N. W., and Matthews, B. F. (2012). Yamanaka, N., Morishita, M., Mori, T., Lemos, N. G., Hossain, M. M., Identification of genes expressed by Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the pathogen Akamatsu, H., et al. (2015). Multiple Rpp-gene pyramiding confers resistance causing soybean rust, at a late stage of infection of susceptible soybean leaves. to Asian soybean rust isolates that are virulent on each of the pyramided genes. Plant Pathol. 61, 773–786. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2011.02550.x Trop. Plant Pathol. 40, 283–290. doi: 10.1007/s40858-015-0038-4 Tremblay, A., Hosseini, P., Li, S., Alkharouf, N. W., and Matthews, B. F. (2013). Yan, H. H., Mudge, J., Kim, D.-J., Larsen, D., Shoemaker, R. C., Cook, D. R., et al. Analysis of Phakopsora pachyrhizi transcript abundance in critical pathways at (2003). Estimates of conserved microsynteny among the genomes of Glycine four time-points during infection of a susceptible soybean cultivar using deep max, Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis thaliana. Theor. Appl. Genet. 106, sequencing. BMC Genomics 14:614. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-614 1256–1265. doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1183-y Tukamuhabwa, P., and Maphosa, M. (2010). State of Knowledge on Breeding for Yin, C., Jurgenson, J. E., and Hulbert, S. H. (2010). Development of a host- Durable Resistance to Soybean Rust Disease in the Developing World. Rome: induced RNAi system in the wheat stripe rust fungus Puccinia striiformis f. FAO. sp. tritici. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 24, 554–561. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-10-10- Uppalapati, S. R., Ishiga, Y., Doraiswamy, V., Bedair, M., Mittal, S., Chen, J., et al. 0229 (2012). Loss of abaxial leaf epicuticular wax in Medicago truncatula irg1/palm1 Yorinori, J. T., Paiva, W. M., Frederick, R. D., Costamilan, L. M., Bertagnolli, mutants results in reduced spore differentiation of anthracnose and nonhost P. F., and Hartman, G. E. (2005). Epidemics of soybean rust (Phakopsora rust pathogens. Plant Cell 24, 353–370. doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093104 pachyrhizi) in Brazil and Paraguay from 2001 to 2003. Plant Dis. 89, 675–677. van de Mortel, M., Recknor, J. C., Graham, M. A., Nettleton, D., Dittman, J. D., doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0675 Nelson, R. T., et al. (2007). Distinct biphasic mRNA changes in response to Youssef, R. M., Kim, K. H., Haroon, S. A., and Matthews, B. F. (2013). Post- Asian soybean rust infection. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 887–899. doi: transcriptional gene silencing of the gene encoding aldolase from soybean cyst 10.1094/MPMI-20-8-0887 nematode by transformed soybean roots. Exp. Parasitol. 134, 266–274. doi: Verweij, P. E., Snelders, E., Kema, G. H. J., Mellado, E., and Melchers, 10.1016/j.exppara.2013.03.009 W. J. G. (2009). Azole resistance in Aspergillus fumigatus: a side-effect Zhang, C., Bradshaw, J. D., Whitham, S. A., and Hill, J. H. (2010). The development of environmental fungicide use? Lancet. Infect. Dis. 9, 789–795. doi: of an efficient multipurpose Bean pod mottle virus viral vector set for 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70265-8 foreign gene expression and RNA silencing. Plant Physiol. 153, 52–65. doi: Vogt, T. (2010). Phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 3, 2–20. doi: 10.1104/pp.109.151639 10.1093/mp/ssp106 Zhang, C., and Ghabrial, S. A. (2006). Development of Bean pod mottle virus-based Wang, J., Shine, M. B., Gao, Q. M., Navarre, D., Jiang, W., Liu, C., et al. (2014). vectors for stable protein expression and sequence-specific virus-induced gene Enhanced disease susceptibility1 mediates pathogen resistance and virulence silencing in soybean. Virology 344, 401–411. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2005.08.046 function of a bacterial effector in soybean. Plant Physiol. 165, 1269–1284. doi: Zhang, C., Whitham, S. A., and Hill, J. H. (2013). Virus-induced gene silencing in 10.1104/pp.114.242495 soybean and common bean. Methods Mol. Biol. 975, 149–156. doi: 10.1007/978- Ward, N. A., Robertson, C. L., Chanda, A. K., and Schneider, R. W. (2012). Effects 1-62703-278-0_11 of Simplicillium lanosoniveum on Phakopsora pachyrhizi, the soybean rust pathogen, and its use as a biological control agent. Phytopathology 102, 749–760. Conflict of Interest Statement: Author RC is an employee of BASF Plant Science doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-01-11-0031 Company GmbH. Weidenbach, D., Jansen, M., Franke, R. B., Hensel, G., Weissgerber, W., Ulferts, S., et al. (2014). Evolutionary conserved function of barley and Copyright © 2016 Langenbach, Campe, Beyer, Mueller and Conrath. This is an Arabidopsis 3-KETOACYL-CoA SYNTHASES in providing wax signals for open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution germination of powdery mildew fungi. Plant Physiol. 166, 1621–1633. doi: License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, 10.1104/pp.114.246348 provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original Wiermer, M., Feys, B. J., and Parker, J. E. (2005). Plant immunity: publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. the EDS1 regulatory node. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8, 383–389. doi: No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.05.010 terms.

Frontiers in Plant Science| www.frontiersin.org 13 June 2016| Volume 7| Article 797