A History of Rome & Floyd County

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Rome & Floyd County - . - 1Bistor! of nomt mutb maab QLomt@ v" Copy NO..h!)R. Property of Date THE CLOCK TOWER. A HISTORY 0,F ROME AND FLOYD COUNTY INCLUDING NUMEROUS INCIDENTS OF MORE THAN LOCAL INTEREST 1540-1922 GEORGE MAGRUDERBATTEY, J R. AUTHOR OF "70,000 MILES ON A SUBMARINE DESTROYER" 'ww ATLANTA, GA. The Webb and Vary Company 1922 4 DEDICATION To the Boy Scouts and the Girl Scouts of Rome and Floyd County, whose youthful enthusiasm and helpfu1,'un- selfish spirit of service promise so much for the development of civic enter- prise and the advancement of in- terest in the wholesome life of the Great Outdoors, this book is affec- tionately dedi- cated by THE AUTHOR. OW AND THEN a queen pawns her jewels to advance the cause of civilization, and thus gives back part of what her admiring subjects have offered up. Similarly has a queen who wears no tiara or crown thrown herself into the breach and made possible the completion at this time of the History of Rome. Her rocking chair is "in soak" because she' believes the enterprise is worth while. If we will redeem the chair out of sales from the book, she will feel amply repaid, and can sit down again. It will be possible through a little unselfish sacrifice on the part of each and all of us. One thousand copies of the book are included in the first binding. More than half of these have been mailed to subscribers who spoke for them in advance. Additional sheets have been printed so that other Romans may have copies who desire them. Extra copies will be bound in accordance with the demand, so 'that the total issue will be just what Romans, former Romans and a select company of "innocent bystanders" make it. The compiler hopes that many will avail themselves of the opportunity to invest, for the double reason that the book contains a wealth of material which everybody should have, and a subscription does just that much to advance the interests of the town and section. He does not urge any support in the expectation of making a profit, for he has put far more into it these two years than he can possibly get out, except in mental satisfaction. He wishes to sell the book not on personal or sentimental grounds, but on the basis of whatever value the purchaser may see in it. No doubt the edition will be quickly exhausted, because material has been included which is expected to stimulate a heavy demand outside of Rome. Then there will be no more copies, for the number is strictly limited. The excuse for this work was fot~ndin the fact that the historians have systematically neglected the section known of old as "Cherokee Georgia." The compiler went back to his birthplace Oct. 21, 1920, to supply whatever of the deficiency he could, realizing that he had had no previous historical experience, but believing that the subject was worthy of a literary masterpiece. He found a fertile field in which to labor; the legend of DeSoto9s visit in 1540, the Indian occupation and removal, , the deeds of valor in war, the constructive enterprises following the .- ' war's wake,, all supplied an inspiration that was irresistible. On begin- , ning his work, he saw the truth of the statement, "The South makes plenty of history, but writes very little of it." His task, therefore, con- sisted in laying a foundation as well as erecting a superstructure, and he realizes the imperfections that such conditions necessarily impose, and > is fully conscious of his inability to handle the material as it deserves. He only hopes that the work may be considered from cover to cover, and thus criticized, rather than that any insignificant error of omission or commission may be allowed to obscure the whole in the estimation of the individual. It is manifestly impossible here to devote much attention to the entire Northwest Georgia section. Floyd's sister counties will no doubt L eventually write histories of their own. However, there are numerous references to happenings elsewhere which are connected with characters IX. or events in Floyd, and in certain instances the material is quite general in its character and application. Since the greater part of Rome's history existed in tradition and in scrap books and old records, it has been deemed advisable to go back as far as possible, and rescue the fragments of early Rome before they are lost in the dust of the past. The story of Rome's part in the removal of the Indians has never been adequately told, nor has the picture of con- ditions just before the Civil War been fully presented. The subject of Rome's part in the war of 1861-5 is all but ignored. 'I'he duty is man- ifestly to revert to the dim beginnings, to give "right-of-way" to the "old settlers," to suggest that the present generation keep newspapers and records liberally so our contemporary history may not suffer likewise. So much material has been developed that the: necessity, of a second volume is apparent. Volume I contains half of the complete narrative, a great many pictures and a vast amount of miscellaneous data. Its faulty arrangement is due to the uncertainty, up to the last moment, eve$ what was to be used. Volume 11, which it is intended should be pub- lished when conditions are more favorable, will contain many additional pictures and such biographical sketches and miscellaneous items as could not be included in the first. These two vqlumes will in a measure tell the romantic tale. The history started with a series of articles in the Rome News, fol- lowed by "Rambles Around Rome." It has been augmented from many sources, and particularly from the files of the old Rome Courier, which' was the forerunner of Rome's daily newspaper, The Tribune-Herald. Both of these present-day newspapers have been unflagging friends of the history. In the collection of material, chiefly of a statistical nature, the most consistent individual has been Richard Venable Mitchell, of Rome. Mr. Mitchell, has worked with splendid spirit and without hope of reward ; Romans are certain to appreciate the accurate data he gives, them in his lists of the natural resources of Floyd, and of the state, city and county officials, various important and interesting dates and a vast' quantity of odd information. Mrs. Harriet Connor Stevens has contributed liberally of her time in order that some of the Cave Spring pioneers might be remembered. Miss Frances Long Harper has also helped substantially at Cave Spring. In forcing the history upon publio attention, the most valiant supporters have been H. H. Shackelton, presi- dent of the Chamber of Commerce ; Robt. H. Clagett, editor of the Rome News; W. S. Rowell, editor of the Tribune-Herald, and Lee J. Langley, wr?tingj for both papers. Thanks are due Hooper Alexander, of Atlanta; 1:. R. L. Smith, of Norfolk, Va. ; Mrs. Mabel Washbourne Anderson, of Pryor, Okla. ; S. W. Ross, of Tahlequah, Okla.; Judge Henry C. Meigs, of Ft. Gibson, Okla., and C. F. Hanke, chief clerk of the Indian Office, Washington, D. C., for much of the Indian data. (The biographies of the Indian leaders are omitted for further investigatioil of conflicting material). Substan- tial assistance has been given by Miss Tommie Dora Barker, librarian of the Carnegie Library, Atlanta, and by Miss Carrie V17illiams, of the ref- erence department ; Mrs. Maud Barker Cobb, state librarian, the Capitol, Atlanta; Duncan Burnett, librarian of the library of the University of Georgia, Athens; Dr. Lucian L. Knight, director of the State De- partment of History, the Capitol, Atlanta, and Miss Ruth Blair, of the same department. Dr. Knight's valuable books have been consulted freely and credit generally given in each instance. Appreciation is like- wise expressed herewith of aid rendered by the Daughters of the Ameri- can Revolution and the United Daughters of the Confederacy, and of the interest shown by Henderson I,. Lanham, president of the Board of Education of the City of Rome, by Prof. B. I?. Quigg, City Superintendent, and Prof. W. C. Rash, County Superintendent, in a plan for teaching local history in the public schools. While nothing definite has been done, the suggestion that a condensed school history be written out of the His- tory of Rome is being considered, and already has the moral support of at least one large Eastern publishing house. Most of the maps are from Rand-McNally & Co., Chicago. The artistic pictures of the Berry Schools were taken by D. W. Dens- more, faculty member, and a number of pictures of landmarks by R. V. Mitchell. Several pictures and some text do not appear because they have been lost or misplaced; a few typographical errors herein like- wise prove the intensely human character of the work of man. Loans negotiated through the assistance of John M. Graham and IVilson M. Hardy greatly helped the work at the outset, and $100 received near the close from a group of Rome business men, headed by E. R. Fishburne, averted an almost certain postponement. Mr. Walter D. Carr, of Silver, Burdett & Co., Boston publishers, loaned the cuts of John Ridge and Major Ridge. To all others who have helped with friendly advice, data or money the heartfelt thanks of the compiler are herewith given. Rome will thank them in her own way. The list is a long one, and it cannot be extended here ; it will appear, perhaps, in the proposed Vol. 11. There is a great deal that is left over for another volume simply because no funds were in sight to print it.
Recommended publications
  • The Smithfield Review, Volume 20, 2016
    In this issue — On 2 January 1869, Olin and Preston Institute officially became Preston and Olin Institute when Judge Robert M. Hudson of the 14th Circuit Court issued a charter Includes Ten Year Index for the school, designating the new name and giving it “collegiate powers.” — page 1 The On June 12, 1919, the VPI Board of Visitors unanimously elected Julian A. Burruss to succeed Joseph D. Eggleston as president of the Blacksburg, Virginia Smithfield Review institution. As Burruss began his tenure, veterans were returning from World War I, and America had begun to move toward a post-war world. Federal programs Studies in the history of the region west of the Blue Ridge for veterans gained wide support. The Nineteenth Amendment, giving women Volume 20, 2016 suffrage, gained ratification. — page 27 A Note from the Editors ........................................................................v According to Virginia Tech historian Duncan Lyle Kinnear, “he [Conrad] seemed Olin and Preston Institute and Preston and Olin Institute: The Early to have entered upon his task with great enthusiasm. Possessed as he was with a flair Years of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University: Part II for writing and a ‘tongue for speaking,’ this ex-confederate secret agent brought Clara B. Cox ..................................................................................1 a new dimension of excitement to the school and to the town of Blacksburg.” — page 47 Change Amidst Tradition: The First Two Years of the Burruss Administration at VPI “The Indian Road as agreed to at Lancaster, June the 30th, 1744. The present Faith Skiles .......................................................................................27 Waggon Road from Cohongoronto above Sherrando River, through the Counties of Frederick and Augusta .
    [Show full text]
  • Cherokees in Arkansas
    CHEROKEES IN ARKANSAS A historical synopsis prepared for the Arkansas State Racing Commission. John Jolly - first elected Chief of the Western OPERATED BY: Cherokee in Arkansas in 1824. Image courtesy of the Smithsonian American Art Museum LegendsArkansas.com For additional information on CNB’s cultural tourism program, go to VisitCherokeeNation.com THE CROSSING OF PATHS TIMELINE OF CHEROKEES IN ARKANSAS Late 1780s: Some Cherokees began to spend winters hunting near the St. Francis, White, and Arkansas Rivers, an area then known as “Spanish Louisiana.” According to Spanish colonial records, Cherokees traded furs with the Spanish at the Arkansas Post. Late 1790s: A small group of Cherokees relocated to the New Madrid settlement. Early 1800s: Cherokees continued to immigrate to the Arkansas and White River valleys. 1805: John B. Treat opened a trading post at Spadra Bluff to serve the incoming Cherokees. 1808: The Osage ceded some of their hunting lands between the Arkansas and White Rivers in the Treaty of Fort Clark. This increased tension between the Osage and Cherokee. 1810: Tahlonteeskee and approximately 1,200 Cherokees arrived to this area. 1811-1812: The New Madrid earthquake destroyed villages along the St. Francis River. Cherokees living there were forced to move further west to join those living between AS HISTORICAL AND MODERN NEIGHBORS, CHEROKEE the Arkansas and White Rivers. Tahlonteeskee settled along Illinois Bayou, near NATION AND ARKANSAS SHARE A DEEP HISTORY AND present-day Russellville. The Arkansas Cherokee petitioned the U.S. government CONNECTION WITH ONE ANOTHER. for an Indian agent. 1813: William Lewis Lovely was appointed as agent and he set up his post on CHEROKEE NATION BUSINESSES RESPECTS AND WILL Illinois Bayou.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cherokee Removal and the Fourteenth Amendment
    MAGLIOCCA.DOC 07/07/04 1:37 PM Duke Law Journal VOLUME 53 DECEMBER 2003 NUMBER 3 THE CHEROKEE REMOVAL AND THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT GERARD N. MAGLIOCCA† ABSTRACT This Article recasts the original understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment by showing how its drafters were influenced by the events that culminated in The Trail of Tears. A fresh review of the primary sources reveals that the removal of the Cherokee Tribe by President Andrew Jackson was a seminal moment that sparked the growth of the abolitionist movement and then shaped its thought for the next three decades on issues ranging from religious freedom to the antidiscrimination principle. When these same leaders wrote the Fourteenth Amendment, they expressly invoked the Cherokee Removal and the Supreme Court’s opinion in Worcester v. Georgia as relevant guideposts for interpreting the new constitutional text. The Article concludes by probing how that forgotten bond could provide the springboard for a reconsideration of free exercise and equal protection doctrine once courts begin exploring the meaning of this Cherokee Paradigm of the Fourteenth Amendment. Copyright © 2003 by Gerard N. Magliocca. † Assistant Professor, Indiana University School of Law—Indianapolis. J.D., Yale Law School, 1998; B.A., Stanford University, 1995. Many thanks to Bruce Ackerman, Bill Bradford, Daniel Cole, Kenny Crews, Brian C. Kalt, Robert Katz, Mary Mitchell, Allison Moore, Amanda L. Tyler, George Wright, and the members of the Northwestern University School of Law Constitutional Colloquium for their insights. Special thanks to Michael C. Dorf, Gary Lawson, Sandy Levinson, and Michael Klarman, who provided generous comments even though we had never met.
    [Show full text]
  • 1893. Congressional Record-House. 1591
    1893. CONGRESSIONAL RECORD-HOUSE. 1591 table, I move that the Senate proceed to the consideration of county of Hamilton and State of Tennessee, in the place of John executive business. W. Stone, removed. The motion was agreed to; and the Senate proceeded to the William Y. C. Hannum, to be postmaster at Maryville, in the consideration of executive business. After fifteen minutes spent county of Blount and State of Tennessee, in the place of James in executive session the doors were reopened, and (at 5 o'clock P. Edmondson, removed. ~d 25 minutes p.m.) the Senate adjourned until to-morrow, Wilson G. Harrison, to be postmaster at Milan, in the county Wednesday, September 20, 1893, at 12 o'clock m. of Gibson and State of Tennessee, in the place of Robert F. Hann, removed. Isaac H. Dungan, to be postmaster at Humboldt, in the county NOMINATIONS. of Gibson and State of Tennes£ee, in the place of John B. Cullen, E~recutire nominations received by the Senate Septernbe1· 19,1893. removed. Joel J. Jones, to be postmaster at Fayett-eville, in the county ASSOCIATE JUSTICE SUPREME COURT. of Lincoln and State of Tennessee, in the place of Hugh M. William B. Hornblower, of New York, to be associate justice Eakin. removed. of the Supreme Court of the United States, vice Samuel Blatch­ William H. McLemore, to be postmaster at Tullahoma, in the· ford, deceased. county of Coffee and State of Tennessee, in the place of John B. Strong, removed. AMBASSADOR EXTRAORDINARY AND PLENIPOTENTIARY. Fletcher W. Thomas, to be postmaster at Dyersburg, in the James J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Present Authors Gave a Sketch of Letitia Preston Floyd
    Letitia Preston Floyd's "My Dear Rush" Letter Jim Glanville and Ryan Mays Copyright 2016 Introduction The present authors gave a sketch of Letitia Preston Floyd (1779- 1852) in the previous volume of the SmithfieldReview.! As background for the reader of this article, it may be brieflyreiterated that Letitia Preston Floyd was born on the Virginia frontier in the newly created Montgomery County. Her parents were the Scotch-Irish immigrant William Preston of Augusta County and Susanna Smith of Hanover County. In 1804 she married John Floyd in Kentucky and went on to become a plantation owner, the mother of twelve children (seven of whom survived to adulthood and marriage), and the First Lady of Virginia. The "My Dear Rush" letter is a 32-page manuscript writtenby Mrs. Floyd dated February 22, 1843. The authors of this article discovered the original copy of this document in January 2014 (after its being closely held within the Preston family for 161 years and ten furtheryears in a Smithfield closet) in a storage box at the Smithfield Plantation.2 The manuscript is in the form of a letter to her son Benjamin Rush Floyd and because of its opening salutation is referred to as the "My Dear Rush" letter. The letter was written at her home on the Cavan estate in Burke's Garden in Tazewell County, Virginia, at the instigation of the historian Lyman Draper. 3 The letter is in Mrs. Floyd's own hand and records many things that can be found nowhere else in the historical record. It is also a crucial document for understanding the European settling of southwest Virginia that was spearheaded by her great-uncle James Patton and her father William Preston.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of Migration from Augusta County, Virginia, to Kentucky, 1777-1800
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1987 "Peopling the Western Country": A Study of Migration from Augusta County, Virginia, to Kentucky, 1777-1800 Wendy Sacket College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Sacket, Wendy, ""Peopling the Western Country": A Study of Migration from Augusta County, Virginia, to Kentucky, 1777-1800" (1987). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625418. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-ypv2-mw79 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. "PEOPLING THE WESTERN COUNTRY": A STUDY OF MIGRATION FROM AUGUSTA COUNTY, VIRGINIA, TO KENTUCKY, 1777-1800 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Wendy Ellen Sacket 1987 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Author Approved, December, 1987 John/Se1by *JU Thad Tate ies Whittenburg i i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................. iv LIST OF T A B L E S ...............................................v LIST OF MAPS . ............................................. vi ABSTRACT................................................... v i i CHAPTER I. AN INTRODUCTION TO THE LITERATURE, PURPOSE, AND ORGANIZATION OF THE PRESENT STUDY .
    [Show full text]
  • John G. Burnett, “The Cherokee Removal Through the Eyes of a Private Soldier” December 11, 1890
    John G. Burnett, “The Cherokee Removal Through the Eyes of a Private Soldier” December 11, 1890 Annotation By President Andrew Jackson’s election in 1828, the only large concentrations of Indian tribes remaining on the east coast were located in the South. The Cherokee had adopted the settled way of life of the surrounding—and encroaching—white society. They were consequently known, along with the Creek, Seminole, Chickasaw, and Choctaw, as one of the “Five Civilized Tribes.” “Civilization,” however, was not enough, and the Jackson administration forced most of these tribes west during the first half of the 1830s, clearing southern territory for the use of whites. Chief John Ross was the principal chief of the Cherokee in Georgia; in this 1836 letter addressed to “the Senate and House of Representatives,” Ross protested as fraudulent the Treaty of New Etocha that forced the Cherokee out of Georgia. In 1838, federal troops forcibly displaced the last of the Cherokee from their homes; their trip to Indian Territory (Oklahoma) is known as the “Trail of Tears.” In May 1838, federal militias started to round up Cherokees and move them into stockades (concentration camps) in several southern states. They were then forced to march 1,000 miles westward. 4,000 to 6,000 Cherokees died as a result of the removal. The journey became known as “the Trail of Tears” or “the Trail where They Cried.” Fifty years later, in 1890, Private John Burnett, who served in the mounted infantry, told his children his memories of the Trail of Tears, which he described as the “execution of the most brutal order in the History of American Warfare.” This is my birthday, December 11, 1890.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naming of Floyd County
    THE NAMING OF FLOYD COUNTY In January 1819, a new Indiana county came into being by vote of the legislature in session at Corydon, at that time the state capital. The new county was christened Floyd, and New Albany was designated as the seat of county government. On these facts the record is clear. But the reason for the selection of the name Floyd is not so clear – in fact, there have been differences of opinion for at least a century on the origin of the name. The story of that dispute and the two theories of the naming of the county are the subject of today’s program. For which Floyd was Floyd County named – Col. John Floyd or Major Davis Floyd? That is the essence of the dispute on the origin of the county’s name. There is no doubt that it was named for one or the other, but conflicting claims have been made through the years as to which Floyd was honored when the County was named. Col. John Floyd was a Virginian who settled near Louisville with his family and relatives in 1779. He was a friend of Daniel Boone and George Rogers Clark and his wife was a niece of Col. William Preston, a distinguished early Kentuckian. John Floyd had been in Kentucky before the Revolutionary War as a surveyor and had helped erect the pioneer fort at Boonsboro. Both a son and grandson of John Floyd later served as governors of Virginia. Floyd’s Fork of Beargrass Creek takes its name from Floyd’s Station, the location of the Floyd County settlement near the present site of St.
    [Show full text]
  • Newsletter of the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail Partnership • Spring 2018
    Newsletter of the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail Partnership • Spring 2018 – Number 29 Leadership from the Cherokee Nation and the National Trail of Tears Association Sign Memorandum of Understanding Tahlequah, OK Principal Chief Bill John Baker expressed Nation’s Historic Preservation Officer appreciation for the work of the Elizabeth Toombs, whereby the Tribe Association and the dedication of its will be kept apprised of upcoming members who volunteer their time and events and activities happening on talent. or around the routes. The Memo encourages TOTA to engage with The agreement establishes a line for govt. and private entities and routine communications between to be an information source on the Trail of Tears Association and the matters pertaining to Trial resource CHEROKEE NATION PRINCIPAL CHIEF BILL JOHN Cherokee Nation through the Cherokee conservation and protection. BAKER AND THE TRAIL OF TEARS PRESIDENT JACK D. BAKER SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FORMALIZING THE CONTINUED PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN THE TRAIL OF TEARS ASSOCIATION AND THE CHEROKEE NATION TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE THE ROUTES AS WELL AS EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT THE HISTORY ASSOCIATED WITH THE TRAIL OF TEARS. Cherokee Nation Principal Chief Bill John Baker and Trail of Tears Association President Jack D. Baker, signed a Memorandum of Understanding on March 1st, continuing a long-time partnership between the association and the tribe. Aaron Mahr, Supt. of the National Trails Intermountain Region, the National Park Service office which oversees the Trail of Tears National Historic Trail said “The Trails Of Tears Association is our primary non-profit volunteer organization on the national historic trail, and the partnership the PICTURED ABOVE: (SEATED FROM L TO R) S.
    [Show full text]
  • 10. PUBLIC HEARING NAT TURNER TRAIL OPENING STATEMENT This
    SOUTHAMPTON COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Regular Session i October 28, 2013 10. PUBLIC HEARING NAT TURNER TRAIL OPENING STATEMENT This public hearing is held pursuant to § 15.2-2204, Code of Virginia, 1950, as amended to receive public comment on a proposed resolution requesting the Commonwealth Transportation Board of Virginia to establish a transportation enhancement project (MAP-21 Transportation Alternatives Program) to develop the next phase of the Nat Turner Trail. The project seeks to acquire up to $240,000 in federal enhancement funds which, if acquired, must be matched with other local funding sources (Southampton County Historical Society) of at least $60,000. Among other things, project funding for this phase of the project may be used to construct ADA compliant sidewalks leading from the Rebecca Vaughan House to 17 additional sites located in the Town of Courtland. The new sidewalks will facilitate pedestrians moving between 6 museums, the public library and the Southampton County Courthouse complex as well as the 17 interpreted Nat Turner Rebellion sites. Funds may also be used to develop and construct parking facilities at the Rebecca Vaughan House. Included in your agenda packages are a number of exhibits to give you some perspective of the project. There is an aerial photo illustrating the walking trail in Courtland, complete with planned sign locations and the proposed text for each sign. There is also an exhibit illustrating the sign layout and specifications. The notice of public hearing was published in the Tidewater News on October 13 and October 20, 2013 as required by law. After conclusion of the public hearing, the Board of Supervisors will consider the comments offered this evening and will proceed to adopt, reject or defer action on the proposed resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • The Judicial History of the Cherokee Nation from 1721 to 1835
    This dissertation has been 64—13,325 microfilmed exactly as received DICKSON, John L ois, 1918- THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835. The University of Oklahoma, Ph.D., 1964 History, general University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY JOHN LOIS DICKSON Norman, Oklahoma 1964 THE JUDICIAL HISTORY OF THE CHEROKEE NATION FROM 1721 TO 1835 APPROVED BY A M ^ rIfaA:. IÀ j ^CV ' “ DISSERTATION (XMHTTEE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Grateful acknowledgement is extended to the follow­ ing persons vdio have helped me both directly and indirectly: Miss Gabrille W. Jones and Mrs. H. H. Keene of the Thomas Gilcrease Institute of American History and Art, Ttilsa, Okla­ homa; Miss Sue Thorton and Mrs. Reba Cox of Northeastern State College, Tahlequah, Oklahoma; Miss Louise Cook, Mrs. Dorothy Williams, Mrs. Relia Looney, and Mrs. Mar on B. At­ kins of the Oklahoma Historical Society; and to Mrs. Alice Timmons of the Phillips Collection as well as the entire staff of the University of Oklahoma Library. Particularly, I would like to thank Mr. Raymond Pillar of Southeastern State College Library for his help in making materials avail­ able to me. I also wish to thank all members of my doctoral com­ mittee at the University of Oklahoma and also President Allen £• Shearer, Dr. James Morrison, and Dr. Don Brown of South­ eastern State College.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Was the Treaty of New Echota Controversial
    Why Was The Treaty Of New Echota Controversial AlgonkianParabolical Lance and predisposed bogging her Giuseppe minglings stillexculpate rebutted or his boomerang hyperventilation roundly. scorching. Darryl dulcifies preliminarily. Unrescinded and Indian Removal Encyclopediacom. He was new echota, treaties on a controversial laws that the news items. University Microfilms Inc Ann Arbor Michigan ShareOK. Get sober know objectives Oklahoma Uniquely American. Pin by aud hamil on Cherokee part of polish heritage Cherokee. Echoes from the Past Futurist or Opportunist News The. Of pending a tragic and controversial historical occurrence in 19th century art history. States was new echota is not our sons and controversial. In the United States the war or been controversial from easy beginning. James was of treaties which the controversial issue they gained their land such a constitution was also killed the committee followed the treaty without asking and. It has not currently publishes content in? Georgia p3 The Missionaries continued controversy over the coat of the. He was of echota, why did not recognized that there is impracticable, boudinot responded affirmatively act affected by andrew jackson against! Would only treaty was set and controversy among many of echota, was placed on this? Cherokee treaty new echota treaty with treaties could not alone escaped murder has reached out until that these controversial topic of controversy surrounding states by. Cherokee Nationalism and New Echota Georgia Historical. Why impact the Treaty to New Echota so controversial The age who signed were not official representatives of the Cherokee people What is been dead that. First of new echota was easily prevented cherokee news of life included, why john howard payne cabin had progressed into what this? This exchange that require ratified treaties and together be green for the.
    [Show full text]