Draft FH LCA Report December 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Draft FH LCA Report December 2008 Landscape Character Assessment for Forest Heath (Draft Version December 2008) NOTE: The Forest Heath Landscape Character Assessment is currently in draft, it is based on work led by Suffolk County Council Contents Introduction - Page 2 What is Landscape Character Assessment? - Page 2 Biodiversity and LCA - Page 2 Assessment Methodology - Page 2 Outputs from the Survey - Page 3 How does LCA fit into Legislative Frameworks relating to Planning? - Page 3 How to use this document - Page 3 Character Types: Estate Sandlands - Page 4 Planned Fenland - Page 7 Settled Fenland - Page 9 Valley Fen - Page 11 Wooded Fen - Page 13 Wooded Valley Meadowlands and Fen - Page 14 Rolling Estate Chalkland - Page 16 Settled Chalkland - Page 18 Rolling Estate Sandlands - Page 20 Wooded Chalk Slopes - Page 22 Plateau Estate Farmland - Page 24 Undulating Estate Farmland - Page 26 Undulating Ancient Farmland - Page 28 Appendix 1: Landscape Character Area Level 2 Map - Page 30 1 Introduction This study is intended to form the basis of a Core Strategy policy relating to landscape in its wider sense, within the Local Development Framework. Decisions relating to development often impinge considerably upon landscape, changing and altering it. Landscape as an entity is not static but is constantly changing and developing. It is anticipated that this study will be referred to by Development Control, developers, Parish Councils, members of the public and all others responsible for, or interested in development within the District. What is Landscape Character Assessment? Landscape Character Assessment (LCA) in its most basic form is a process of assessing the particular features (individual items such as churches) and elements (general items such as hills) within landscapes which make one landscape different from another. Landscape is a product of lots of different factors ranging from the topography (hills, valleys, fens etc), which is influenced by underlying geology, climate and soil type, through landcover (types of agriculture, whether wooded or not etc), settlement (farms, villages and towns), through to smaller elements such as the size of fields and the presence or absence of hedges right down to single features such as a church or water- tower. All of these factors cumulatively make up the feel or character of a landscape. The process of undertaking a LCA is to try to break down the overall landscape into its constituent parts, understanding the contribution of each of them to the whole effect and then be able to describe and analyse the landscape in a manner which is useful to the particular purpose set - in this case development planning. The result is the production of a map showing areas which have distinctive, homogenous ‘character’, together with descriptions of these areas and an analysis of why they look as they do - what features or elements have contributed to making the landscape what it is. Biodiversity and LCA Apart from simply describing landscape, other factors can be included or have influence within a LCA. In the case of an LDF, these other factors might include the biodiversity of the area. Biodiversity has a similar place within the planning regime to landscape and the two are obviously linked in terms of what they contribute to the sense of place of any area. Biodiversity in this survey is recognised through the use of landcover and soil type/geological data, and it is acknowledged that the survey will support and mesh with the Suffolk Biodiversity Action Plan and the Forest Heath Biodiversity Action Plan where appropriate. Assessment Methodology The assessment was conducted by Suffolk County Council in a partnership with the Living Landscapes Project based at Reading University and all District and Borough Councils in Suffolk using the standard LCA methodology which has been developed by the Countryside Agency and the Living Landscapes Project. This process has been in development for over twenty years and is a robust process for undertaking such an assessment (Landscape Character Assessment Guidelines; Countryside Agency et al ., 2002). In this instance over 300 individual landscape description units (LDU's) were identified from information on geology, soils, landform, vegetation, and settlement pattern. Field surveys have been carried out to identify the strength of character and condition of the 2 LDUs. A draft Landscape Character Map of Suffolk, that arranged these LDU's into 28 Landscape Typologies. The preparation of the full written descriptions has refined the understanding of the landscape of Suffolk further and the revised map has 31 Landscape Typologies, 13 of which are found in Forest Heath. Outputs from the Survey This assessment comprises a map, which shows where different overall character areas can be found (at what is termed Level 2 within the LCA Guidelines Book) and a description for each Character Area, including among other things key characteristics of the area, its general location and settlement pattern. How does LCA fit into Legislative Frameworks relating to Planning? Landscape Character Assessment has been promoted as a tool to be used in land use planning for over ten years. The Countryside Agency has been using and developing the process for somewhat longer. In 1997 the then PPG7 contained a sentence which promoted the option for local planning authorities to incorporate an LCA within their planning documents to inform policy and decisions. This has been added to in the current PPS7 to the effect that such a study is expected. The purpose behind this gradual process has been to try to resolve the difficulties (as the Government and others perceive them) associated with ‘landscape quality’ based surveys. Landscape quality was and still is a very important means of apportioning landscape policy. National Parks, Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty and at District level, Areas of High Quality Landscape (AHQL) all rely on this form of assessment. However, it has been criticised on the basis that it is very subjective - ‘what is beauty?’ and on the basis that it does not value the wider landscape which is not beautiful. By changing the criteria to ‘character’ rather than ‘beauty’ the two problems were largely addressed. Everywhere has a character and the character assessment process works to try to remove a good deal of subjectivity. Nevertheless, relative quality is still an important; some would argue the most important factor in defining policy. Therefore, whilst it will be expected that any review of District or County level planning policy documents will be underpinned by an LCA rather than simply areas which have been designated as of higher quality and those that have not, there remains a clause which allows Councils to retain (but informed by and LCA) some form of qualitative assessment. It will be seen that the issues which surround the assessment of, and policy apportionment resulting from , considerations of landscape sensitivity mentioned above, are likely to be very similar to issues relating to relative landscape quality. How to use this Document This document sets out to provide detailed descriptions of each of the landscape character types indicated on the map of the district which accompanies this document. The level of assessment of the landscape at Level 2 (‘County/District level’ as defined by the Countryside Agency Guidance) is intended to give a strategic view of the relative variety of landscapes to be found in the District. 3 Estate Sandlands Key Characteristics • Flat or very gently rolling plateaux of freely-draining sandy soils, overlying drift deposits of either glacial or fluvial origin • Chalky in parts of the Breckland • Absence of watercourses • Extensive areas of heathland or acid grassland • Strongly geometric structure of fields enclosed in the 18 th & 19 th century. • Generally a landscape without ancient woodland, but there are some isolated and very significant exceptions • Widespread planting of tree belts and rectilinear plantations • Large scale commercial forestry • Characteristic ‘pine lines’ especially, but not solely, in Breckland • High incidence of relatively late, estate type, brick buildings • North-west slate roofs with white or yellow bricks. Flint is also widely used in as a walling material. Location This is a large area of landscape found in two main areas of Suffolk, the North West and south east/along the coast. In the north east and centre of Forest Heath it is made up of the dry slopes and central plateau of the Breckland, extending from Freckenham and Kentford eastward on both sides of the River Lark to Wordwell and Hengrave, and northward to Brandon and along the Little Ouse valley to Knettishall. Geology, landform and soils All the parts of this landscape type consist of flat or very gently rolling plateaux of freely draining sandy soils, overlying drift deposits of either glacial or fluvial origin, sometimes chalky in parts of the Breckland, but usually acid and sandy. Landholding and enclosure pattern The dry mineral soils of this landscape and the general absence of watercourses gave rise to extensive areas of heathland or acid grassland that, historically, were used either for sheep grazing or for rabbit warrens, the sheep-grazed heaths were often referred to as ‘sheepwalks’. The earliest warrens were established on the poorest soils and were owned by ecclesiastical landlords: the bishops of Ely had a warren at Brandon by 1252; the prior and convent of Ely received a specific grant of a warren at Lakenheath in 1300, but had had ‘free-warren’ hunting rights since 1251; and Bury abbey had a warren at Mildenhall by 1328. Many of the warrens and heaths were enclosed in the period of agricultural improvement in the 18 th and 19 th centuries and now survive mainly as place names, e.g. Eriswell High Warren and Weather Heath. The enclosed land, like that of the Planned Fenlands, has the strongly geometric structure that results from the map- based work of surveyors.
Recommended publications
  • 15 Row Heath
    ROW HEATH ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILE 2021 This Division comprises The Rows Ward in its entirety plus parts of Lakenheath, Kentford & Moulton, Manor and Risby Wards www.suffolkobservatory.info 2 © Crown copyright and database rights 2021 Ordnance Survey 100023395 CONTENTS ▪ Demographic Profile: Age & Ethnicity ▪ Economy and Labour Market ▪ Schools & NEET ▪ Index of Multiple Deprivation ▪ Health ▪ Crime & Community Safety ▪ Additional Information ▪ Data Sources ELECTORAL DIVISION PROFILES: AN INTRODUCTION These profiles have been produced to support elected members, constituents and other interested parties in understanding the demographic, economic, social and educational profile of their neighbourhoods. We have used the latest data available at the time of publication. Much more data is available from national and local sources than is captured here, but it is hoped that the profile will be a useful starting point for discussion, where local knowledge and experience can be used to flesh out and illuminate the information presented here. The profile can be used to help look at some fundamental questions e.g. • Does the age profile of the population match or differ from the national profile? • Is there evidence of the ageing profile of the county in all the wards in the Division or just some? • How diverse is the community in terms of ethnicity? • What is the impact of deprivation on families and residents? • Does there seem to be a link between deprivation and school performance? • What is the breakdown of employment sectors in the area? • Is it a relatively healthy area compared to the rest of the district or county? • What sort of crime is prevalent in the community? A vast amount of additional data is available on the Suffolk Observatory www.suffolkobservatory.info The Suffolk Observatory is a free online resource that contains all Suffolk’s vital statistics; it is the one-stop-shop for information and intelligence about Suffolk.
    [Show full text]
  • Little Ouse and Waveney Project
    Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project May 2006 214980-UA02/01/B - 12th May 2006 Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Mott MacDonald Norfolk County Council Transnational Ecological Network (TEN3) Little Ouse and Waveney Project Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 13 th Jan J. For January TEN A E. Lunt 2006 Purseglove workshop 24 th May E. Lunt J. B Draft for Comment 2006 Purseglove This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any o ther project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Mott MacDonald being obtained. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequence of this document being used for a pur pose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person using or relying on the document for such other purpose agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm his agreement to indemnify Mott MacDonald for all loss or damage re sulting therefrom. Mott MacDonald accepts no responsibility or liability for this document to any party other than the person by whom it was commissioned. To the extent that this report is based on information supplied by other parties, Mott MacDonald accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered by the client, whether contractual or tortious, stemming from any conclusions based on data supplied by parties other than Mott MacDonald and used by Mott MacDonald in preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Yoxford Conservation Area Appraisal
    8 Yoxford Conservation Area Appraisal February 2020 0 Bibliography Bettley, James & Pevsner, Nikolaus. The Buildings of England, Suffolk: East (London, 2015) Delf, Charles Yoxford (Yoxford, 1971) Historic England. England’s Places – Yoxford https://historicengland.org.uk/images-books/photos/englands- places/gallery/11297?place=Yoxford%2c+SUFFOLK+(Parish)&terms=Yoxford&searchtype=e nglandsplaces&i=1&wm=1&bc=16|17 Historic England. National Heritage List for England https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/advanced- search?searchType=nhleadvancedsearch Howard Jonathan A Thousand Fancies, The Collection of Charles Wade of Snowshill Manor (Stroud, 2016) Jessop, Michael Days Far Away, Memories of Charles Paget Wade 1883-1956 (Tewkesbury, 1996) Ministry of Housing Communities and Local Government, National Planning Policy Framework (London, 2018) https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment _data/file/740441/National_Planning_Policy_Framework_web_accessible_version.pdf Spooner, Sarah. Regions and Designed Landscapes in Georgian England (Abingdon, 2016) Stell, Christopher. Nonconformist Chapels in Eastern England (London, 2002) Suffolk Coastal District Council. Supplementary Planning Guidance 6: Historic Parks and Gardens (Woodbridge 1995) http://www.eastsuffolk.gov.uk/assets/Planning/Suffolk- Coastal-Local-Plan/Supplementary-Planning-Guidance/SPG6-Historic-parks-and- gardens.pdf Suffolk County Council Archaeological Service. Report 2008/198 Cockfield Hall A Desk Based Assessment (Ipswich, 2008)
    [Show full text]
  • 1-Chapters 1 - 18.Pdf
    Suffolk Minerals & Waste Local Plan, Adopted July 2020 Contact Graham Gunby Development Manager Growth, Highways & Infrastructure Directorate Suffolk County Council 8 Russell Road Ipswich Suffolk IP1 2BX Tel: 01473 264807 Email: [email protected] Website: www.suffolk.gov.uk For more information about our minerals and waste planning policy go to: https://www.suffolk.gov.uk/planning-waste-and-environment/planning- applications/minerals-and-waste-policy/ Cover photograph acknowledgements: 1. Gt Blakenham Energy from Waste Facility, courtesy of SUEZ Recycling and Recovery UK Ltd, and; 2. Cavenham Quarry, with permission from Allen Newport Ltd. Suffolk County Council Page 1 Suffolk Minerals & Waste Local Plan, Adopted July 2020 Contents Policy GP1: Presumption in favour of sustainable development ...................... 11 Policy GP2: Climate change mitigation and adaptation ................................... 12 Policy GP3: Spatial strategy ............................................................................ 14 Policy GP4: General environmental criteria ..................................................... 16 Policy MP1: Provision of land won sand and gravel ........................................ 21 Policy MP2: Proposed sites for sand and gravel extraction ............................. 22 Policy MP3: Borrow pits ................................................................................... 23 Policy MP4: Agricultural and public supply reservoirs ...................................... 24 Policy MP5: Cummulative environmental
    [Show full text]
  • 27 Valley Meadows and Fens EP/Edit1/02.08.10
    27 Valley Meadows and Fens EP/Edit1/02.08.10 Valley Meadows and Fens Key Characteristics • Flat, narrow, river valley bottoms • Deep peat or mixtures of peat and sandy deposits • Ancient meres within the valley bottoms & important fen sites • Small grassland fields, bounded by dykes running at right angles to the main river Sparse scattering of small alder carr & plantation • woodlands • Part of a wider estate type landscape • Largely unsettled, except for the occasional farmstead • Drier fields turned over to the production of arable crops • Cattle grazing now often peripheral to commercial agriculture • Loss to scrub encroachment, tree planting and horse paddocks Location This landscape type occurs in two main areas of the county: • In the north-west in the valleys of the River Lark (from Mildenhall upstream to Ampton) and of the Black Bourn (from Euston to Pakenham and Norton) • In the north-east in the east-flowing valleys of the Hundred River (Rushmere to Ellough), the Wang (Wolsey Bridge to Uggeshall), the Blyth (Bulcamp to Heveningham and along a tributary to Bramfield), and the Minsmere River or Yox (Eastbridge to Sibton). Geology, landform and soils These landscapes comprise flat, narrow, river valley bottoms, those in the east having deep peat deposits, except in the higher reaches the Yox and the Hundred River. In the west, deep peat is limited to parts of the Lark, with mixtures of peat and sandy deposits Suffolk Landscape Character Assessment 27 Valley Meadows and Fens EP/Edit1/02.08.10 elsewhere. Occasionally there are ancient meres within the valley bottoms, for example at Micklemere in Pakenham, and at Livermere.
    [Show full text]
  • ( 279 ) Church Plate in Suffolk. Deaneryof
    ( 279 ) fr CHURCH PLATE IN SUFFOLK. DEANERYOFBLAKBURNE. THE Communion Plate of this Deanery.. includes a considerable number of pieces of some ithportance, from their connection with the owners of, property in the district ; but as regards form and ornament, there is nothing special to record, and the plate-marks are of no unusual variety. There are eleven Elizabethan Cups, and one paten. The Hopton Cup is a good specimen, and must have belonged, at one time, to Hardingham, in Norfolk. Five parishes have plate with armorial beatings; and four others have donors' names; without arms. There is one Norwich piece. The copper-gilt service at Euston is a fine show set, of some historical interest ; and the silver at Bardwell, and Thorpe-by-Ixworth worthily repre- sents the families of Read and Crofts. Diss Rectory, Norfolk. C. R. MANNING,F.S.A. BARDWELL. SS. PETER AND PAUL. CUPS : a pair, height 7 inches ; diameter of bowl 3- inches; a circular bOss in the stem. Inscription :=BARDWELL Aft IN SUFFOLKE Marks : leopard's head crowned; .maker's mark G.R., linked in shield; court hand N for 1650; lion passant. PATENS : (1) BARDWELL on the rim. Diameter 51 inches, with a foot: Marks same as on the Cups. (2) inscribed BARDWELL on the foot.• • Diameter 9/ inches, with a foot. Mark orieonly, R N crowned. FLAGONS: a pair tankard shaped, Withlids and handles. V VOL.. IX. PART 3. 280 CHURCH PLATE IN SUFFOLK. Height 9 inches. in front, it coat of _arms in mantling, with helmet, [Gules] on a bend [Argent] three ducks, [Sable] beaked and.
    [Show full text]
  • WSC Planning Decisions 43/19
    PLANNING AND REGULATORY SERVICES DECISIONS WEEK ENDING 25/10/2019 PLEASE NOTE THE DECISIONS LIST RUN FROM MONDAY TO FRIDAY EACH WEEK DC/15/2298/FUL Planning Application - (i) Extension and Village Hall DECISION: alterations to Hopton Village Hall (ii) Thelnetham Road Approve Application Doctor's surgery and associated car Hopton DECISION TYPE: parking and the modification of the existing Suffolk Committee vehicular access onto Thelnetham Road IP22 2QY ISSUED DATED: (iii) residential development of 37 24 Oct 2019 dwellings (including 11 affordable housing WARD: Barningham units) and associated public open space PARISH: Hopton Cum including a new village green, Knettishall landscaping,ancillary works and creation of new vehicular access onto Bury Road APPLICANT: Pigeon Investment Management AGENT: Evolution Town Planning LLP - Mr David Barker DC/18/0628/HYB Hybrid Planning Application - 1. Full Former White House Stud, DECISION: Planning Application - (i) Horse racing White Lodge Stables Refuse Application industry facility (including workers Warren Road DECISION TYPE: dwelling) and (ii) new access (following Herringswell Delegated demolition of existing buildings to the CB8 7QP ISSUED DATED: south of the site) 2. Outline Planning 22 Oct 2019 Application (Means of Access to be WARD: Iceni considered) (i) up to 100no. dwellings and PARISH: Herringswell (ii) new access (following demolition of existing buildings to the north of the site and the existing dwelling known as White Lodge Bungalow). APPLICANT: Hill Residential Ltd AGENT: Mrs Meghan Bonner - KWA Architects (Cambridge) Ltd Planning and Regulatory Services, West Suffolk Council, West Suffolk House, Western Way, Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk, IP33 3YU DC/19/0235/FUL Planning Application - 2no.
    [Show full text]
  • Records Relating to the 1939 – 1945 War
    Records Relating to the 1939 – 1945 War This is a list of resources in the three branches of the Record Office which relate exclusively to the 1939-1945 War and which were created because of the War. However, virtually every type of organisation was affected in some way by the War so it could also be worthwhile looking at the minute books and correspondence files of local councils, churches, societies and organisations, and also school logbooks. The list is in three sections: Pages 1-10: references in all the archive collections except for the Suffolk Regiment archive. They are arranged by theme, moving broadly from the beginning of the War to its end. Pages 10-12: printed books in the Local Studies collections. Pages 12-21: references in the Suffolk Regiment archive (held in the Bury St Edmunds branch). These are mainly arranged by Battalion. (B) = Bury Record Office; (I) = Ipswich Record Office; (L) = Lowestoft Record Office 1. Air Raid Precautions and air raids ADB506/3 Letter re air-raid procedure, 1940 (B) D12/4/1-2 Bury Borough ARP Control Centre, in and out messages, 1940-1945 (B) ED500/E1/14 Hadleigh Police Station ARP file, 1943-1944 (B) EE500/1/125 Bury Borough ARP Committee minutes, 1935-1939 (B) EE500/33/17/1-7 Bury Town Clerk’s files, 1937-1950 (B) EE500/33/18/1-6 Bury Town Clerk’s files re Fire Guard, 1938-1947 (B) EE500/44/155-6 Bury Borough: cash books re Government Shelter scheme (B) EE501/6/142-147 Sudbury Borough ARP registers, report books and papers, 1938-1945 (B) EE501/8/27(323, Plans of air-raid shelters, Sudbury,
    [Show full text]
  • Church Farm Lane Thelnetham
    Church Farm Lane Thelnetham Guide Price £400,000 The Pleasance Church Farm Lane | Thelnetham | Diss | IP22 1JY Bury St. Edmunds 17 miles, Diss 8 miles, Cambridge 45 miles A superbly presented detached bungalow tucked away down a quiet private lane with wonderful views over open countryside Entrance Hall | Cloakroom | Reception/Dining Room | Fitted Kitchen | 3 Bedrooms | Family Bathroom | En-suite Bathroom | Garage | Ample Parking to Front | Rear Garden | Views Over Open Countryside | Quiet Private Country Lane | Oil Fired Central Heating | 0.31 Acres (s.t.s) The Pleasance The Pleasance is situated in a quiet, tucked away and peaceful location. Within the large entrance hall there are a range of cupboards as well as doorways leading off to most of the bedrooms as well as a family bathroom which benefits from a mainly lawned and has a greenhouse, shed and base in the far principal rooms including the modern fitted cloakroom. The modern suite comprising panelled bath with electric shower right hand corner for a summerhouse. However what must reception/dining room benefits from an open brick fireplace over, pedestal wash hand basin and low flush WC plus tiled be considered one of the main features of the rear garden is and wood mantel surround. There are also glazed double walls and floor. the superb views it affords over open countryside. doors which lead out to the side garden and sliding doors which lead out to the rear garden. From the reception/dining Outside Location room there is a doorway leading into the fitted kitchen which The front of the property is accessed via a five bar gate Thelnetham is situated on the Suffolk/Norfolk border with overlooks the rear garden.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Sizewell C, Stage 4 Consultation Response Saturday, September 21, 2019 EDF ENERGY - SIZEWELL C - STAGE 4 PRE-APPLICATION CONSULTATION RESPONSE FROM THEBERTON AND EASTBRIDGE PARISH COUNCIL Introduction Theberton Theberton is a small village of approximately 170 people and 90 houses mostly straddling the B1122. It is about 4 miles north of the proposed Sizewell C (SZC) large twin reactor site. The proposed entrance to the main site will be approximately 1 mile from the village entrance sign. Within the village of Theberton there is St Peters Church, a Grade I listed thatched roof church with an unusual round tower, a Grade II listed public house, a village hall, two working farms, a cattery, a small business selling wild bird and other animal feeds, a small caravan park and other places to stay for visitors to enjoy the peace and quiet of the countryside. The successful village hall offers many activities and classes to the community and surrounding areas. Eastbridge Eastbridge is a tranquil hamlet of around 70 people and 40 houses nestled in a rural landscape with no street signs or speed limits. It borders the Minsmere River which cuts through an area of important wetland known as the Minsmere Levels forming part of the Minsmere - Walberswick Heaths and Marshes Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), which is also the location of RSPB Minsmere Reserve. Within Eastbridge there is a public house, the Eels Foot Inn, a working farm, a certified and a basic campsite, for visitors to enjoy the peace and quiet of the countryside. Many local people and visitors enjoy the circular walk from Eastbridge to the Minsmere sluice to reach the Suffolk Heritage Coast and the sea returning through RSPB Minsmere or via National Trust’s Dunwich Coastguards Cottages.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Local Group Newsletter
    “The RSPB speaks out for birds and wildlife, tackling the problems that threaten our environment. Nature is amazing - help us keep it that way”. Cambridge Local Group Newsletter Issue No: 105 September 2013 Contents Page 2 Editor’s notes Brenda Smith 2 Group Leader’s Notes Melvyn Smith Field Trip Reports 3 Dawn chorus Brenda & Melvyn 4 Nene Washes Brenda & Melvyn 5 Lakenheath Fen Rachel Lowry 6 Hickling Broad Brenda & Melvyn 8 Yorkshire weekend Brenda & Melvyn 13 Great Ryburgh and Cley Marshes Brenda & Melvyn 14 Alde Estuary and Minsmere Brenda & Melvyn 16 Garden Warbler 17 In Praise of Predators Colin Kirtland 18 Interview with Ian Barthorpe Lyn Guy News from Local Reserves 20 Fen Drayton Alison Nimmo 21 Lakenheath Fen Katherine Puttick 23 Ouse Fen Chris Hudson 24 Fowlmere Doug Radford 26 Ouse Washes Mike Burdekin Events 27 Field Trips Andrew Camps 27 Group Indoor meetings 28 Cambridgeshire Bird Club indoor meetings The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) registered charity in England and Wales no. 207076, Scotland no SC037654 Cambridge Local Group Newsletter No 105 September 2013 Editor’s Notes Spring was very slow at starting with winter reluctant to let go of its grip, and with the final arrival of the nice weather it made everything late. Migrants were late arriving and even our birds were slow to start breeding. But once the good weather arrived it started to get off the ground very quickly. By July butterflies were everywhere with lots of peacocks and small tortoiseshell, large and small whites, much to Mel’s dismay as they found our cabbage plants irresistible.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure and Environmental Capacity Appraisal Final Report St Edmundsbury Borough Council Forest Heath District Council May 2009
    Infrastructure and Environmental Capacity Appraisal Final Report St Edmundsbury Borough Council Forest Heath District Council May 2009 Infrastructure and Environmental Capacity Appraisal Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1 Guide to the Study 1 Background 2 Approach and Key Findings 3 Summary Schedule for ‘Optimal Range’ of Growth 10 2.0 Introduction 17 Background 17 Objectives 17 Priorities and Trade-offs in Infrastructure Provision 21 Outputs 23 3.0 Methodology 25 4.0 Background 29 Policy Context 29 Background Review of Evidence 32 Context for Growth 37 5.0 Baseline Infrastructure Position 42 Introduction and Approach 42 Infrastructure Pressures by Settlement 48 Overall Study Area Wide Impacts and Infrastructure Pressures 58 Overall Messages 60 6.0 Defining Opportunity Areas 61 Introduction and Approach 61 Identification of Constraints 63 Settlement Hierarchy and Characteristics (Constraints and Opportunities) 67 Constraints and Opportunities by Opportunity Area 87 Identification of Potential Future Development Patterns by Settlement 92 Summary of Capacity Ranges 115 Appraisal of Indicative Development Patterns 118 Conclusions 124 7.0 Infrastructure to Support Growth 125 Introduction 125 Physical, Social and Community Infrastructure Requirements 126 Phasing Infrastructure and Marginal Costs 145 Final Report, St Edmundsbury and Forest Heath Infrastructure and Environmental Capacity Appraisal 8.0 Costs, Funding and Delivery 154 Costs of Infrastructure 154 Infrastructure Prioritisation and Phasing 156 Funding and Delivery Mechanisms
    [Show full text]