Package Leaflet: Information for the Patient Desogestrel Rowex
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Comparing the Effects of Combined Oral Contraceptives Containing Progestins with Low Androgenic and Antiandrogenic Activities on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis In
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS Amiri et al Review Comparing the Effects of Combined Oral Contraceptives Containing Progestins With Low Androgenic and Antiandrogenic Activities on the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Gonadal Axis in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Mina Amiri1,2, PhD, Postdoc; Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani2, MD; Fatemeh Nahidi3, PhD; Ali Kabir4, MD, MPH, PhD; Fereidoun Azizi5, MD 1Students Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic Of Iran 2Reproductive Endocrinology Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic Of Iran 3School of Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic Of Iran 4Minimally Invasive Surgery Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic Of Iran 5Endocrine Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic Of Iran Corresponding Author: Fahimeh Ramezani Tehrani, MD Reproductive Endocrinology Research Center Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 24 Parvaneh Yaman Street, Velenjak, PO Box 19395-4763 Tehran, 1985717413 Islamic Republic Of Iran Phone: 98 21 22432500 Email: [email protected] Abstract Background: Different products of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) can improve clinical and biochemical findings in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) through suppression of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of COCs containing progestins with low androgenic and antiandrogenic activities on the HPG axis in patients with PCOS. -
Desogestrel-Only Pill (Cerazette)
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care: first published as 10.1783/147118903101197593 on 1 July 2003. Downloaded from Faculty of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care Clinical Effectiveness Unit A unit funded by the FFPRHC and supported by the University of Aberdeen and SPCERH to provide guidance on evidence-based practice New Product Review (April 2003) Desogestrel-only Pill (Cerazette) Journal of Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 2003; 29(3): 162–164 Evidence from a randomised trial has shown that a 75 mg (microgrammes) desogestrel pill inhibits ovulation in 97% of cycles. Thus, on theoretical grounds, we would expect the desogestrel pill to be more effective than existing progestogen- only pills (POPs). However, Pearl indices from clinical trials comparing it to a levonorgestrel POP were not significantly different. Therefore an evidence-based recommendation cannot be made that the desogestrel pill is different from other POPs in terms of efficacy, nor that it is similar to combined oral contraception (COC) in this respect. An evidence-based recommendation can be made that the desogestrel-only pill is similar to other POPs in terms of side effects and acceptability. The desogestrel-only pill is not recommended as an alternative to COC in routine practice, but provides a useful alternative for women who require oestrogen-free contraception. In clinical trials: l Ovulation was inhibited in 97% of cycles at 7 and 12 months after initiation. l The Pearl index was 0.41 per 100 woman-years, which was not significantly different from a levonorgestrel-only pill. However, the trial providing these data was too small to detect a clinically important difference. -
Connecticut Medicaid
ACNE AGENTS, TOPICAL ‡ ANGIOTENSIN MODULATOR COMBINATIONS ANTICONVULSANTS, CONT. CONNECTICUT MEDICAID (STEP THERAPY CATEGORY) AMLODIPINE / BENAZEPRIL (ORAL) LAMOTRIGINE CHEW DISPERS TAB (not ODT) (ORAL) (DX CODE REQUIRED - DIFFERIN, EPIDUO and RETIN-A) AMLODIPINE / OLMESARTAN (ORAL) LAMOTRIGINE TABLET (IR) (not ER) (ORAL) Preferred Drug List (PDL) ACNE MEDICATION LOTION (BENZOYL PEROXIDE) (TOPICAL)AMLODIPINE / VALSARTAN (ORAL) LEVETIRACETAM SOLUTION, IR TABLET (not ER) (ORAL) • The Connecticut Medicaid Preferred Drug List (PDL) is a BENZOYL PEROXIDE CREAM, WASH (not FOAM) (TOPICAL) OXCARBAZEPINE TABLET (ORAL) listing of prescription products selected by the BENZOYL PEROXIDE 5% and 10% GEL (OTC) (TOPICAL) ANTHELMINTICS PHENOBARBITAL ELIXIR, TABLET (ORAL) Pharmaceutical and Therapeutics Committee as efficacious, BENZOYL PEROXIDE 6% CLEANSER (OTC) (TOPICAL) ALBENDAZOLE TABLET (ORAL) PHENYTOIN CHEW TABLET, SUSPENSION (ORAL) safe and cost effective choices when prescribing for HUSKY CLINDAMYCIN PH 1% PLEGET (TOPICAL) BILTRICIDE TABLET (ORAL) PHENYTOIN SOD EXT CAPSULE (ORAL) A, HUSKY C, HUSKY D, Tuberculosis (TB) and Family CLINDAMYCIN PH 1% SOLUTION (not GEL or LOTION) (TOPICAL)IVERMECTIN TABLET (ORAL) PRIMIDONE (ORAL) Planning (FAMPL) clients. CLINDAMYCIN / BENZOYL PEROXIDE 1.2%-5% (DUAC) (TOPICAL) SABRIL 500 MG POWDER PACK (ORAL) • Preferred or Non-preferred status only applies to DIFFERIN 0.1% CREAM (TOPICAL) (not OTC GEL) (DX CODE REQ.) ANTI-ALLERGENS, ORAL SABRIL TABLET (ORAL) those medications that fall within the drug classes DIFFERIN -
Coordinating Investigator
Public Disclosure Synopsis Page 1 of 6 KF4248/05 12 July 2016 Confidential TITLE OF TRIAL: Safety of the oral monophasic contraceptive GRT4248 (0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/2 mg chlormadinone acetate) in comparison to 0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/0.15 mg desogestrel given for 6 medication cycles SPONSOR/COMPANY: Grünenthal GmbH, 52099 Aachen, Germany COORDINATING Milano, Italy INVESTIGATOR: TRIAL CENTER(S): Thirty-three centers in total: 11 in Germany, 4 in Spain, 5 in France, 6 in Italy, 2 in Portugal, 5 in Russia PUBLICATION Not applicable (REFERENCE): TRIAL PERIOD (YEARS): First subject enrolled: 08 NOV 2005 Last subject completed: 16 AUG 2006 Data-base lock 24 OCT 2006 PHASE OF DEVELOPMENT: Phase III OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety of 0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/2 mg chlormadinone acetate, given for 24 days each 28-day cycle in comparison to 0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/0.15 mg desogestrel given for 21 days each 28-day cycle. Each investigational medicinal product (IMP) was to be taken for 6 cycles. METHODOLOGY: Randomized, multicenter, double-blind, desogestrel-controlled, parallel group, multiple administration, Phase III trial NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: Subjects were allocated by randomization to two medication groups, one receiving 0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/2 mg chlormadinone acetate (the GRT4248 group) and one receiving 0.02 mg ethinylestradiol/0.15 mg desogestrel (the EE/DSG group). The planned and actual sizes of the two groups were: Grünenthal Public Disclosure Synopsis Page 2 of 6 Confidential KF4248/05 12 July 2016 Evaluated Medication Randomized -
Guidance on Bioequivalence Studies for Reproductive Health Medicines
Medicines Guidance Document 23 October 2019 Guidance on Bioequivalence Studies for Reproductive Health Medicines CONTENTS 1. Introduction........................................................................................................................................................... 2 2. Which products require a bioequivalence study? ................................................................................................ 3 3. Design and conduct of bioequivalence studies .................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Basic principles in the demonstration of bioequivalence ............................................................................... 4 3.2 Good clinical practice ..................................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Contract research organizations .................................................................................................................... 5 3.4 Study design .................................................................................................................................................. 5 3.5 Comparator product ....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.6 Generic product .............................................................................................................................................. 6 3.7 Study subjects -
Combined Oral Contraceptives Plus Spironolactone Compared With
177:5 M Alpañés, F Álvarez-Blasco Randomized trial of common 177:5 399–408 Clinical Study and others drugs for PCOS Combined oral contraceptives plus spironolactone compared with metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a one-year randomized clinical trial Macarena Alpañés*, Francisco Álvarez-Blasco*, Elena Fernández-Durán, Manuel Luque-Ramírez and Héctor F Escobar-Morreale Correspondence Diabetes, Obesity and Human Reproduction Research Group, Department of Endocrinology & Nutrition, Hospital should be addressed Universitario Ramón y Cajal & Universidad de Alcalá & Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria IRYCIS & to H F Escobar-Morreale Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Diabetes y Enfermedades Metabólicas Asociadas CIBERDEM, Madrid, Spain Email *(M Alpañés and F Álvarez-Blasco contributed equally to this work) hectorfrancisco.escobar@ salud.madrid.org Abstract Objective: We aimed to compare a combined oral contraceptive (COC) plus the antiandrogen spironolactone with the insulin sensitizer metformin in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Design: We conducted a randomized, parallel, open-label, clinical trial comparing COC (30 μg of ethinylestradiol and 150 μg of desogestrel) plus spironolactone (100 mg/day) with metformin (850 mg b.i.d.) for one year in women with PCOS (EudraCT2008–004531–38). Methods: The composite primary outcome included efficacy (amelioration of hirsutism, androgen excess and menstrual dysfunction) and cardiometabolic safety (changes in the frequencies of disorders of glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia and hypertension). A complete anthropometric, biochemical, hormonal and metabolic evaluation was conducted every three months and data were submitted to intention-to-treat analyses. European Journal European of Endocrinology Results: Twenty-four patients were assigned to COC plus spironolactone and 22 patients to metformin. -
Makale16.Pdf
Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology ISSN: 1742-5255 (Print) 1744-7607 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iemt20 Current understanding on pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of progestins for treating pain associated to endometriosis Fabio Barra, Carolina Scala & Simone Ferrero To cite this article: Fabio Barra, Carolina Scala & Simone Ferrero (2018): Current understanding on pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of progestins for treating pain associated to endometriosis, Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology, DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1461840 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/17425255.2018.1461840 Accepted author version posted online: 04 Apr 2018. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iemt20 Publisher: Taylor & Francis Journal: Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism & Toxicology DOI: 10.1080/17425255.2018.1461840 Current understanding on pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety of progestins for treating pain associated to endometriosis Fabio Barra 1,2, Carolina Scala 1,2, Simone Ferrero 1,2 Institutions: 1 Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy 2 Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), University of Genoa, Italy Corresponding Author: Simone Ferrero MD, PhD; Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IRCCS AOU San Martino – IST, Largo R. Benzi 10, 16132 Genoa, Italy Telephone 01139 010 511525 Mobile 01139 3477211682 Fax 01139 010511525 E-mail: [email protected] Funding This paper was not funded. Declaration of interest: The authors have no relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financialAccepted interest in or financial conflict wi thManuscript the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript. -
Molecular and Preclinical Pharmacology of Nonsteroidal Androgen Receptor Ligands
Molecular and Preclinical Pharmacology of Nonsteroidal Androgen Receptor Ligands Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Amanda Jones, M.S. Graduate Program in Pharmacy The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: James T. Dalton, Advisor Thomas D. Schmittgen William L. Hayton Robert W. Brueggemeier Copyright by Amanda Jones 2010 Abstract The androgen receptor (AR) is critical for the growth and development of secondary sexual organs, muscle, bone and other tissues, making it an excellent therapeutic target. Ubiquitous expression of AR impedes the ability of endogenous steroids to function tissue selectively. In addition to the lack of tissue selectivity, clinical use of testosterone is limited due to poor bioavailability and pharmacokinetic problems. Our lab, in the last decade, discovered and developed tissue selective AR modulators (SARMs) that spare androgenic effects in secondary sexual organs, but demonstrate potential to treat muscle wasting diseases. This work reveals the discovery of next generation SARMs to treat prostate cancer and mechanistically characterize a prospective SARM in muscle and central nervous system (CNS). Prostate cancer relies on the AR for its growth, making it the primary therapeutic target in this disease. However, prolonged inhibition, with commercially available AR antagonists, leads to the development of mutations in its ligand binding domain resulting in resistance. Utilizing the crystal structure of AR-wild-type and AR-W741L mutant, we synthesized a series of AR pan- antagonists (that inhibit both wild-type and mutant ARs). Structure activity relationship studies indicate that sulfonyl and amine linkages of the aryl propionamide pharmacophore are important for the antagonist activity. -
OUH Formulary Approved for Use in Breast Surgery
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Formulary FORMULARY (Y): the medicine can be used as per its licence. RESTRICTED FORMULARY (R): the medicine can be used as per the agreed restriction. NON-FORMULARY (NF): the medicine is not on the formulary and should not be used unless exceptional approval has been obtained from MMTC. UNLICENSED MEDICINE – RESTRICTED FORMULARY (UNR): the medicine is unlicensed and can be used as per the agreed restriction. SPECIAL MEDICINE – RESTRICTED FORMULARY (SR): the medicine is a “special” (unlicensed) and can be used as per the agreed restriction. EXTEMPORANEOUS PREPARATION – RESTRICTED FORMULARY (EXTR): the extemporaneous preparation (unlicensed) can be prepared and used as per the agreed restriction. UNLICENSED MEDICINE – NON-FORMULARY (UNNF): the medicine is unlicensed and is not on the formulary. It should not be used unless exceptional approval has been obtained from MMTC. SPECIAL MEDICINE – NON-FORMULARY (SNF): the medicine is a “special” (unlicensed) and is not on the formulary. It should not be used unless exceptional approval has been obtained from MMTC. EXTEMPORANEOUS PREPARATION – NON-FORMULARY (EXTNF): the extemporaneous preparation (unlicensed) cannot be prepared and used unless exceptional approval has been obtained from MMTC. CLINICAL TRIALS (C): the medicine is clinical trial material and is not for clinical use. NICE TECHNOLOGY APPRAISAL (NICETA): the medicine has received a positive appraisal from NICE. It will be available on the formulary from the day the Technology Appraisal is published. Prescribers who wish to treat patients who meet NICE criteria, will have access to these medicines from this date. However, these medicines will not be part of routine practice until a NICE TA Implementation Plan has been presented and approved by MMTC (when the drug will be given a Restricted formulary status). -
Desogestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol (By Mouth) Desogestrel (Des-Oh-JES-Trel), Ethinyl Estradiol (ETH-I-Nil Es-Tra-DYE-Ol)
Desogestrel/Ethinyl Estradiol (By mouth) Desogestrel (des-oh-JES-trel), Ethinyl Estradiol (ETH-i-nil es-tra-DYE-ol) Used to prevent pregnancy. This medicine is an oral contraceptive (birth control pill). Brand Name(s):Kariva, Apri, Mircette, Velivet, Desogen, Solia, Reclipsen, Ortho-Cept, Cyclessa, Cesia, Caziant, Azurette There may be other brand names for this medicine. When This Medicine Should Not Be Used: You should not use this medicine if you have had an allergic reaction to desogestrel or ethinyl estradiol. You should not use this medicine if you are pregnant or if you have liver disease or heart disease. You should not use this medicine if you have a chest pain, heart rhythm problems, blood vessel disorder, or if you have unusual vaginal bleeding. You should not use this medicine if you have cancer of the breast, liver, or uterus. Do not use this medicine if you have ever had a heart attack, stroke, or history of blood clots. Do not use this medicine if you have had jaundice (yellowing of your skin or the whites of your eyes) from pregnancy or birth control pills. How to Use This Medicine: Tablet • Your doctor will tell you how much of this medicine to use and how often. Do not use more medicine or use it more often than your doctor tells you to. • This medicine comes with patient instructions. Read and follow these instructions carefully. Ask your doctor or pharmacist if you have any questions. • Unless your doctor tells you to use a different schedule, start taking this medicine on the first Sunday after your menstrual period starts. -
Effect of Two Kinds of Different Combined Oral Contraceptives Use
Contraception 86 (2012) 332–336 Original research article Effect of two kinds of different combined oral contraceptives use on bone mineral density in adolescent women☆ ⁎ Ling Gaia, , Yifang Jiab, Meihua Zhanga, Ping Gaib, Sumei Wanga, Hong Shia, Xiaojie Yua, Yonghong Liuc aKey Laboratory for Improving Birth Outcome Technique, Shandong Provincial Institute of Science and Technology for Family Planning, Jinan, Shandong 250002, China bProvincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China cShandong Medical Imaging Research Institute, Jinan, Shandong 250021, China Received 26 December 2011; revised 16 January 2012; accepted 18 January 2012 Abstract Background: Steroid hormonal contraceptives are highly effective and widely used. Most studies have shown a negative effect of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) on the bone mineral density (BMD) of adolescents. The study was conducted to compare BMD among users of ethinylestradiol/desogestrel, users of ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate and nonhormonal control subjects in women aged 16–18 years. Study Design: The study included 450 women 16–18 years of age. One hundred fifty women were using ethinylestradiol/desogestrel, 150 women were using ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate, and 150 women were using nonhormonal contraception as control subjects. BMD of the lumbar spine and femoral neck was obtained using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and mean BMD changes in COCs users and nonusers were compared. Results: At 24 months of treatment, lumbar spine and femoral neck mean BMD values in women (n=127) who used ethinylestradiol/ desogestrel were slightly lower compared with baseline, but these effects did not reach statistical significance (p=.837 and p=.630, respectively). The mean lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD values in women (n=134) who used ethinylestradiol/cyproterone acetate were slightly higher compared with baseline, but there was no statistical significance (p=.789 and p=.756, respectively). -
Assessment Report Cyproterone Acetate/Ethinylestradiol (2 Mg/0.035 Mg) Containing Medicinal Products
24 May 2013 EMA/339116/2013 Assessment report cyproterone acetate/ethinylestradiol (2 mg/0.035 mg) containing medicinal products Procedure under Article 107i of Directive 2001/83/EC Procedure number: EMEA/H/A-107i/1357 Assessment Report as adopted by the PRAC with all information of a confidential nature deleted. 7 Westferry Circus ● Canary Wharf ● London E14 4HB ● United Kingdom Telephone +44 (0)20 7418 8400 Facsimile +44 (0)20 7418 8416 E -mail [email protected] Website www.ema.europa.eu An agency of the European Union © European Medicines Agency, 2013. Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Table of contents 1. Background information on the procedure .............................................. 3 2. Scientific discussion ................................................................................ 3 2.1. Clinical aspects .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.1. Clinical safety .................................................................................................... 4 2.1.2. Clinical efficacy ............................................................................................... 22 2.2. Risk minimisation activities .................................................................................. 29 2.3. Product information ............................................................................................ 31 2.4. Benefit-risk assessment .....................................................................................