DOCSLIB.ORG

Uranium Report 2019 Everything You Need to Know About Uranium!

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Uranium Report 2019 Everything You Need to Know About Uranium! Uranium Report 2019 Everything you need to know about uranium! www.resource-capital.ch | [email protected] Disclaimer Dear reader, to total a loss of the invested capital and - depending Capital AG are obtained from sources which are on the investment – to further obligations for example deemed reliable and trustworthy by Swiss Resource Please read the complete disclaimer in the fol- additional payment liabilities. In general, purchase Capital AG and the respective authors at the time of lowing pages carefully before you start reading and sell orders should always be limited for your own preparation. Swiss Resource Capital AG and all this Swiss Resource Capital Publication. By using protection. Swiss Resource Capital AG employed or engaged this Swiss Resource Capital Publication you persons have worked for the preparation of all of the agree that you have completely understood the This applies especially to all second-line-stocks in published contents with the greatest possible dili- following disclaimer and you agree completely the small and micro cap sector and especially to ex- gence to guarantee that the used and underlying with this disclaimer. If at least one of these point ploration and resource companies which are discus- data as well as facts are complete and accurate and does not agree with you than reading and use of sed in the publications of Swiss Resource Capital AG the used estimates and made forecasts are realistic. this publication is not allowed. and are exclusively suitable for speculative and risk Therefore, liability is categorically precluded for pe- aware investors. But it applies to all other securities cuniary losses which could potentially result from use We point out the following: as well. Every exchange participant trades at his own of the information for one’s own investment decision. risk. The information in the publications of Swiss Re- Swiss Resource Capital AG and the authors of source Capital AG do not replace an on individual All information published in publications of Swiss the Swiss Resource Capital AG directly own and/ needs geared professional investment advice. In spi- Resource Capital AG reflects the opinion of the res- or indirectly own shares of following Companies te of careful research, neither the respective author pective author or third parties at the time of reparation which are described in this publication: Appia nor Swiss Resource Capital AG will neither guarantee of the publication. Neither Swiss Resource Capital AG Energy, Denison Mines, Energy Fuels, Fission nor assume liability for actuality, correctness, mista- nor the respective authors can be held responsible for Uranium, GoviEx, Laramide Resources, Skyhar- kes, accuracy, completeness, adequacy or quality of any resulting pecuniary losses. All information is sub- bour Resources, Uranium Energy. the presented information. For pecuniary losses re- ject to change. Swiss Resource Capital AG as well as sulting from investments in securities for which infor- the respective authors assures that only sources Swiss Resource Capital AG has closed IR mation was available in all publications of Swiss Re- which are deemed reliable and trustworthy by Swiss consultant contracts with the following compa- source Capital AG liability will be assumed neither by Resource Capital AG and the respective authors at nies which are mentioned in this publication: Swiss Capital Resource AG nor by the respective the time of preparation are used. Although the as- Uranium Energy. author neither explicitly nor implicitly. sessments and statements in all publications of Swiss Resource Capital AG were prepared with due diligen- Swiss Resource Capital AG receives compen- Any investment in securities involves risks. Politi- ce, neither Swiss Resource Capital AG nor the res- sation expenses from the following companies cal, economical or other changes can lead to signifi- pective authors take any responsibility or liability for mentioned in this publication: Appia Energy, Deni- cant stock price losses and in the worst case to a the actuality, correctness, mistakes, accuracy, com- son Mines, Energy Fuels, Fission Uranium, Go- total loss of the invested capital and - depending on pleteness, adequacy or quality of the presented facts viEx, Laramide Resources, Skyharbour Resour- the investment – to further obligations for example or for omissions or incorrect information. The same ces, Uranium Energy. Therefore, all mentioned additional payment liabilities. Especially investments shall apply for all presentations, numbers, designs companies are sponsors of this publication. in (foreign) second-line-stocks, in the small and micro and assessments expressed in interviews and videos. cap sector, and especially in the exploration and re- source companies are all, in general, associated with Swiss Resource Capital AG and the respective au- Risk Disclosure and Liability an outstandingly high risk. This market segment is thors are not obliged to update information in publi- characterized by a high volatility and harbours dan- cations. Swiss Resource Capital AG and the respec- Swiss Resource Capital AG is not a securities ser- ger of a total loss of the invested capital and - depen- tive authors explicitly point out that changes in the vice provider according to WpHG (Germany) and ding on the investment – to further obligations for used and underlying data, facts, as well as in the BörseG (Austria) as well as Art. 620 to 771 obliga- example additional payment liabilities. As well, small estimates could have an impact on the forecasted tions law (Switzerland) and is not a finance company and micro caps are often very illiquid and every order share price development or the overall estimate of according to § 1 Abs. 3 Nr. 6 KWG. All publications of should be strictly limited and, due to an often better the discussed security. The statements and opinions the Swiss Resource Capital AG are explicitly (inclu- pricing at the respective domestic exchange, should of Swiss Capital Resource AG as well as the respec- ding all the publications published on the website be traded there. An investment in securities with low tive author are not recommendations to buy or sell a http://www.resource-capital.ch and all sub-websites liquidity and small market cap is extremely speculati- security. (like http://www.resource-capital.ch/de) and the ve as well as a high risk and can lead to, in the worst website http://www.resource-capital.ch itself and its case, a total loss of the invested capital and - depen- Neither by subscription nor by use of any publica- sub-websites) neither financial analysis nor are they ding on the investment – to further obligations for tion of Swiss Resource Capital AG or by expressed equal to a professional financial analysis. Instead, all example additional payment liabilities. Engagements recommendations or reproduced opinions in such a publications of Swiss Resource Capital AG are exclu- in the publications of the shares and products pre- publication will result in an investment advice cont- sively for information purposes only and are expres- sented in all publications of Swiss Resource Capital ract or investment brokerage contract between sively not trading recommendations regarding the AG have in part foreign exchange risks. The deposit Swiss Resource Capital AG or the respective author buying or selling of securities. All publications of portion of single shares of small and micro cap com- and the subscriber of this publication. Swiss Resource Capital AG represent only the opini- panies and low capitalized securities like derivatives on of the respective author. They are neither explicitly and leveraged products should only be as high that, Investments in securities with low liquidity and nor implicitly to be understood as guarantee of a par- in case of a possible total loss, the deposit will only small market cap are extremely speculative as well as ticular price development of the mentioned financial marginally lose in value. a high risk. Due to the speculative nature of the pre- instruments or as a trading invitation. Every invest- All publications of Swiss Resource Capital AG are sented companies their securities or other financial ment in securities mentioned in publications of Swiss exclusively for information purposes only. All infor- products it is quite possible that investments can Resource Capital AG involve risks which could lead mation and data in all publications of Swiss Resource lead to a capital reduction or to a total loss and - de- 2 Swiss Resource Capital AG | Poststrasse 1 | 9100 Herisau | Schweiz pending on the investment – to further obligations for these principles and recommendations are respected coverage to cover these risks and dangers, the relati- example additional payment liabilities. Any invest- by employees, authors and editors. onship with employees; relationships with and the de- ment in warrants, leveraged certificates or other fi- mands from the local communities and the indigenous nancial products bears an extremely high risk. Due to population; political risks; the availability and rising political, economical or other changes significant Forward-looking Information costs in connection with the mining contributions and stock price losses can arise and in the worst case a workforce; the speculative nature of mineral explorati- total loss of the invested capital and - depending on Information and statements in all publications of on and development including risks of receiving and the investment – to further
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Annual Report
    The Future is Nuclear 2005 ANNUAL REPORT Bridging the Gene Producing affordable, clean energy while achieving a sustainable balance between increasing electricity demand and environmental stewardship – this is the promise and potential of a future powered by nuclear energy. It’s why a new generation is opting for nuclear as a reliable and secure energy choice. Cameco is poised and ready to support the new generation. We are a company with the expertise and capacity to deliver the benefits of nuclear energy – starting right now. As the world’s largest uranium producer, Cameco already provides about 20% of global uranium production from the richest mines on the planet. We are also expanding our production by developing two new mines. The company is looking ration Gap to the long-term nuclear future, seeking new reserves OUR PROFILE through a global exploration program with emphasis Cameco, with its head office in in North America and Australia. In nuclear fuel Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, is the production, Cameco has 38% of the western world’s world’s largest uranium producer UF6 conversion capacity, and provides conversion as well as a significant supplier of services and fuel fabrication for Candu reactors. conversion services. The company’s Power production rounds out Cameco’s nuclear competitive position is based on its focus, with 1,000 MW of nuclear power in Ontario. controlling ownership of the world’s largest high-grade reserves and low- A new generation, attentive to the wisdom of cost operations. Cameco’s uranium scientists, environmentalists and consumers, products are used to generate clean understands the future is nuclear.
    [Show full text]
  • Fs and Sentiments Will Continue to Impact These Target Commodities
    FORUM ENERGY METALS CORP. INTERIM CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS For the six month periods ended May 31, 2020 and 2019 (Unaudited – Prepared by Management) (Stated in Canadian Funds) NOTICE OF NO REVIEW BY AUDITOR The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements of Forum Energy Metals Corp. (“the Company”) have been prepared by management and have not been the subject of a review by the Company’s independent auditor. Forum Energy Metals Corp. (An Exploration Stage Company) Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position as at Canadian Funds Unaudited - prepared by management May 31, 2020 November 30, 2019 Note ($) ($) ASSETS Current assets Cash 4 275,970 131,308 Marketable securities 5 15,095 7,901 Receivables 6 66,771 26,032 Prepaid expenses and deposits 44,182 38,038 402,017 203,279 Equipment 1,988 2,316 Exploration and evaluation assets 7 2,671,010 2,671,010 3,075,014 2,876,605 LIABILITIES Current liabilities Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 21,567 263,649 Due to related parties 9 30,940 255,170 Promissory notes 7 82,722 79,806 135,229 598,625 Loan 8 40,000 - 175,229 598,625 SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Capital stock 9 45,535,243 45,214,204 Allotted but not issued - - Contributed Surplus - Options 9 5,465,784 5,325,114 Contributed Surplus - Warrants 9 2,339,652 2,339,652 Accumulated deficit (50,440,893) (50,600,990) 2,899,786 2,277,980 3,075,014 2,876,605 Nature of Operations and Going Concern – Note 1 Subsequent Event – Note 12 Approved and authorized by the Board of Directors on July 27, 2020: ”Richard Mazur” “Larry Okada” Richard Mazur Larry Okada Director Director The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements 2 | P a g e Forum Energy Metals Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • + 2020 Annual Information Form
    Denison Mines Corp. 2020 Annual Information Form March 26, 2021 ABOUT THIS ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM This annual information form (“AIF”) is dated March 26, Table of Contents 2021. Unless stated otherwise, all of the information in this AIF is stated as at December 31, 2020. About this AIF .................................... 1 About Denison ................................... 6 This AIF has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Developments over the Last Three securities laws and contains information regarding Years ................................................. 8 Denison’s history, business, mineral reserves and The Uranium Industry ........................ 17 resources, the regulatory environment in which Denison Mineral Resources and Reserves 24 does business, the risks that Denison faces and other Mineral Properties ............................. 27 important information for Shareholders. Athabasca Exploration: Sampling, Analysis and Data Verification ........... 102 This AIF incorporates by reference: Denison Operations ........................... 107 Manager of UPC ................................ 111 Denison’s management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2020, Denison Closed Mines Group ........... 112 Environmental, Health, Safety and Denison’s audited consolidated financial Sustainability Matters ........................ 112 statements for the year ended December 31, 2020, Government Regulation .................... 114 Risk Factors ...................................... 120 both of which
    [Show full text]
  • 20170828-Jason-Cameron-Nuclear-Infrastructure-Council-Eng.Pdf
    THE CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION PRESENTATION TO THE USNIC TRADE MISSION TO CANADA Jason Cameron, Vice-President Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission nuclearsafety.gc.ca August 28, 2017 – Ottawa, Ontario Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect health, safety, security and the environment • Implements Canada's international commitments on the peaceful use of nuclear energy • Disseminates objective scientific, technical and regulatory information to the public Canada’s nuclear watchdog We will never compromise safety! Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 2 Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission • Established in May 2000, under the Nuclear Safety and Control Act • Replaced the Atomic Energy and Control Board (AECB) under the 1946 Atomic Energy Control Act More than 70 years of ensuring nuclear safety Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 3 CNSC Regulates All Nuclear-Related Facilities and Activities • Uranium mines and mills • Uranium fuel fabrication and processing • Nuclear power plants • Nuclear substance processing • Industrial and medical applications • Nuclear research and educational activities • Transportation of nuclear substances • Nuclear security and safeguards • Export/import control • Waste management facilities …From cradle to grave Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 4 Independent Commission • Quasi-judicial administrative tribunal • Agent of the Government of Canada (the Crown) • Reports to Parliament through Minister of Natural Resources • Commission members are independent and part-time • Commission hearings are public and Webcast • All presentations, including staff’s, are public • Decisions can only be reviewed by Federal Court Transparent, science-based decision-making Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission 5 Our Commission Members Dr. Michael Binder President and Chief Executive Officer, CNSC (Term expires May 8, 2018) Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Analysis of Seawater Uranium Recovered by a Polymeric Adsorbent System
    IAEA-CN-216 Abstact 180 Cost analysis of seawater uranium recovered by a polymeric adsorbent system E. Schneider, H. Lindner, D. Sachde, M. Flicker The University of Texas at Austin, USA E-mail address of main author: [email protected] In tandem with its adsorbent development and marine testing efforts, the United States Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy, routinely updates and expands its cost analysis of technologies for extracting uranium from seawater. If informed by repeatable data from field tests, a rigorous cost analysis can convincingly establish seawater uranium as a “backstop” to conventional uranium resources. A backstop provides an essentially unlimited supply of an otherwise exhaustible resource. Its role is to remove the uncertainty around the long-term sustainability of the resource. The cost analysis ultimately aims to demonstrate a uranium production cost that is sustainable for the nuclear power industry, with no insurmountable technical or environmental roadblocks. It is also a tool for guiding further R&D, identifying inputs and performance factors where further development would offer the greatest reduction in costs and/or uncertainties. A life cycle discounted cash flow methodology is used to calculate the uranium production cost and its uncertainty from the costs of fundamental inputs including chemicals and materials, labor, equipment, energy carriers and facilities. The inputs themselves are defined by process flow models of the adsorbent fabrication and grafting, mooring at sea, recovery, and elution and purification steps in the seawater uranium recovery process. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has carried out marine tests of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory amidoxime grafted polymer adsorbent in natural seawater.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation to the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities
    CANADIAN NUCLEAR SAFETY COMMISSION nuclearsafety.gc.ca Michael Binder President and Chief Executive Officer Presentation to the Canadian Association of Nuclear Host Communities February 21, 2018 – Ottawa, Ontario nuclearsafety.gc.ca eDOCS: 5437640 The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) Our Mandate Regulates the use of nuclear energy and materials to protect health, safety, and security and the environment Implements Canada's international commitments on the peaceful use of nuclear energy Disseminates objective scientific, technical and regulatory information to the public We will never compromise safety 2 nuclearsafety.gc.ca The CNSC Regulates All Nuclear Facilities And Activities In Canada Uranium mines and mills Nuclear research and educational activities Uranium fuel fabrication and processing Transportation of nuclear substances Nuclear power plants Nuclear security and safeguards Nuclear substance processing Import and export controls Industrial and medical applications Waste management facilities 3 nuclearsafety.gc.ca CNSC Staff Located Across Canada Fiscal year 2017–18 Human resources: 857 full-time equivalents Financial resources: $148 million (~70% cost recovery; ~30% appropriation) Licensees: 1,700 Licences: 2,500 Headquarters (HQ) in Ottawa 4 site offices at power plants Saskatoon Calgary 1 site office at Chalk River 4 regional offices Chalk River HQ Point Lepreau Laval Bruce Darlington Mississauga Pickering 4 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Independent Commission • Quasi-judicial administrative tribunal • Agent of the Crown (duty to consult) • Reports to Parliament through Minister of Natural Resources • Commission members are independent and part-time • Commission hearings are public and Webcast • Staff presentations in public • Decisions are reviewable by Federal Court Transparent, science-based decision making 5 nuclearsafety.gc.ca Commission Members Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation
    SOURCES, EFFECTS AND RISKS OF IONIZING RADIATION United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2016 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes UNITED NATIONS New York, 2017 NOTE The report of the Committee without its annexes appears as Official Records of the General Assembly, Seventy-first Session, Supplement No. 46 and corrigendum (A/71/46 and Corr.1). The report reproduced here includes the corrections of the corrigendum. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The country names used in this document are, in most cases, those that were in use at the time the data were collected or the text prepared. In other cases, however, the names have been updated, where this was possible and appropriate, to reflect political changes. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.17.IX.1 ISBN: 978-92-1-142316-7 eISBN: 978-92-1-060002-6 © United Nations, January 2017. All rights reserved, worldwide. This publication has not been formally edited. Information on uniform resource locators and links to Internet sites contained in the present publication are provided for the convenience of the reader and are correct at the time of issue. The United Nations takes no responsibility for the continued accuracy of that information or for the content of any external website.
    [Show full text]
  • Denison Mines Corp
    Denison Mines Corp. 2019 Annual Information Form March 13, 2020 ABOUT THIS ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM This annual information form (“AIF”) is dated March 13, Table of Contents 2020. Unless stated otherwise, all of the information in About this AIF .................................... 1 this AIF is stated as at December 31, 2019. About Denison ................................... 5 Developments over the Last Three This AIF has been prepared in accordance with Canadian Years ................................................. 7 The Uranium Industry ........................ 15 securities laws and contains information regarding Denison’s history, business, mineral reserves and Mineral Resources and Reserves 22 resources, the regulatory environment in which Denison Mineral Properties ............................. 26 does business, the risks that Denison faces and other Athabasca Exploration: Sampling, important information for Shareholders. Analysis and Data Verification ........... 88 Denison Operations ........................... 94 This AIF incorporates by reference: Manager of UPC ................................ 99 Denison Closed Mines Group ........... 99 Denison’s management discussion and analysis (“MD&A”) for the year ended December 31, 2019, Environmental, Health and Safety Matters .............................................. 100 which is available under the Company’s profile on Government Regulation .................... 102 SEDAR (www.sedar.com) and on EDGAR Risk Factors ...................................... 107 (www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml)
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Life Cycle Analysis of Base Load Electricity in Ontario
    [Type text] Canadian Energy Research Institute Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Base Load Electricity Generation in Ontario Seyed Jazayeri Paul Kralovic Afshin Honarvar Abbas Naini Jon Rozhon Rami Shabaneh Thorn Walden Prepared for the Canadian Nuclear Association October 2008 Relevant • Independent • Objective COMPARATIVE LIFE CYLE ASESSMENT (LCA) OF BASE LOAD ELECTRICITY GENERATION IN ONTARIO ii Canadian Energy Research Institute v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES..........................................................................................................IX LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................XI ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..............................................................................................XIII EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. XV ES1.1 Background .........................................................................................................xv ES1.2 Purpose of the Study ............................................................................................xv ES1.3 Methodology........................................................................................................xv ES1.4 The Process LCA ................................................................................................. xvi ES2 Power Generation in Canada ................................................................................ xvi ES3
    [Show full text]
  • Variant28.Indd Copy
    VARIANT 28 | SPRING 2007 | 31 The Friendly Atom NuclearSpin On February 15, Tony Blair’s plan to introduce a uranium resources amounted to about 3.6 million new generation of nuclear power stations suffered tonnes. These resources show a wide variation in ore a serious setback when the High Court ruled that grade and accessibility. ... Uranium ore is not an energy the consultation carried out by the government resource unless the ore grade is high enough. Below earlier was “misleading” and “seriously flawed”. grade 0.02% (U3O8 Uranium Oxide) more energy is Justice Sullivan’s ruling enjoins the government required to produce and exploit the uranium fuel than to canvass public opinion again, causing a likely can be generated from it. Falling ore grade leads to delay in the publication of the energy white rapidly rising CO2 emissions from the nuclear energy paper scheduled for March. The judgement cycle. Assuming world nuclear generating capacity is a significant victory for Greenpeace which, remains at 2005 levels, after about 2016 the mean describing it as a sham, had applied for a judicial grade of uranium ore will fall significantly from today’s review of the consultation process. levels, and even more so after 2034. After about 60 The landmark ruling closed a chapter that years the world nuclear power system will fall off the ‘The Future’s started on January 23, 2006 when the government ‘Energy Cliff’ – meaning that the nuclear system will Mirror’, Corneila officially launched the 12-week consultation consume as much energy as can be generated from the Hesse-Honegger, exercise on the UK’s energy needs, entitled: ‘Our uranium fuel.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcript of Commission Meeting of December 14, 2016
    Canadian Nuclear Commission canadienne de Safety Commission sûreté nucléaire Public meeting Réunion publique December 14th, 2016 Le 14 décembre 2016 Public Hearing Room Salle des audiences publiques 14th floor 14e étage 280 Slater Street 280, rue Slater Ottawa, Ontario Ottawa (Ontario) Commission Members present Commissaires présents Dr. Michael Binder M. Michael Binder Dr. Sandy McEwan Dr Sandy McEwan Ms Rumina Velshi Mme Rumina Velshi Secretary: Secrétaire: Mr. Marc Leblanc M. Marc Leblanc General Counsel: Avocate générale : Ms Lisa Thiele Me Lisa Thiele 613-521-0703 StenoTran www.stenotran.com ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Opening Remarks 1 CMD 16-M66.C 3 Approval of Agenda CMD 16-M68 3 Status Report on Power Reactors CMD 16-M64 13 Written submission from CNSC staff CMD 16-M50/16-M50.A 18 Oral presentation by CNSC staff CMD 16-M50.1 46 Written submission by Canadian Nuclear Workers' Council CMD 16-M50.2 48 Written submission from Northwatch CMD 16-M70/16-M70.A 155 Oral presentation by CNSC staff CMD 16-M70.1 179 Submission from Énergie NB Power CMD 16-M70.2 180 Submission from Canadian Nuclear Laboratories CMD 16-M49/16-M49.A 245 Oral presentation by CNSC staff CMD 16-M49.5/16-M49.5A 270 Presentation by Cameco Corporation CMD 16-M49.3 298 Submission from the Canadian Nuclear Workers' Council iii TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE CMD 16-M49.4/16-M49.4A/16-M49.4B 348 Presentation by AREVA Resources Canada Inc. CMD 16 M49.1 363 Submission from the Saskatchewan Environmental Society and the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation CMD 16-M69 397 Submission from CNSC staff CMD 16-M72 411 Written submission from CNSC staff 1 Ottawa, Ontario / Ottawa (Ontario) --- Upon commencing on Wednesday, December 14, 2016 at 8:34 a.m.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preeminent Uranium Explorer in Canada's Athabasca Basin
    A Preeminent Uranium Explorer in Canada’s Athabasca Basin TSX-V: SYH October 2021 Disclaimer This presentation has been prepared by Skyharbour Resources Ltd. (“SYH”) using its best efforts to realistically and factually present the information contained. However, subjective opinion, dependence upon factors outside SYH’s control and outside information sources unavoidably dictate that SYH cannot warrant the V: SYH | SKYHARBOURLTD.COM information contained to be exhaustive, complete or sufficient. In addition, many factors can effect the - presentation which could significantly alter the results intended by SYH, rendering the presentation TSX unattainable or substantially altered. Therefore, interested uses should conduct their own assessment and consult with their own professional advisors prior to making any investment decisions. This presentation does not constitute a prospectus or public offering for financing, and no guarantees are made or implied with regard to the success of SYH proposed ventures. Interested investors are advised to seek advice from the investment advisors. Some of the statements in this document may be deemed to be "forward-looking statements". All statements on in this document, other than statements of historical facts, that address events or developments that management of the Company expects, are forward-looking statements. Although management believes the expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, such statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results or developments may differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward- looking statements if management's beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, include market prices, exploration and development successes, continued availability of capital and financing, and general economic, market or business conditions.
    [Show full text]