DOCSLIB.ORG

A Procedural Reconstruction of the Urban Topography

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Cave and City: A Procedural Reconstruction of the Urban Topography of Magnesia on the Maeander A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture by Marie Saldaña 2015 © Copyright by Marie Saldaña 2015 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Cave and City: A Procedural Reconstruction of the Urban Topography of Magnesia on the Maeander by Marie Saldaña Doctor of Philosophy in Architecture University of California, Los Angeles, 2015 Professor Diane Favro, Chair Caves and cities are normally found at the opposite ends of the architectural spectrum. The former is typically perceived as a primitive, undesigned object, part of nature; the latter is held as the height of civilized planning and rationality. At the Greco-Roman city of Magnesia on the Maeander in western Turkey, however, these two typologies were intimately bound together in unexpected ways. Magnesia on the Maeander was the site of the ancient cult of a cave-dwelling Apollo at Hylai, whose devotees were sometimes imbued with a supernatural strength that enabled them to jump from high cliffs and rush through the mountains carrying entire trees that they had torn up by the roots. City and cave appear to have been linked through a complex ii dynamic of movement in which the frenzied tree-carriers ended up depositing their burdens at a city-center sanctuary of Dionysos. This movement provides an alternative way of understanding the layout of the city, and augments the scant archaeological remains of the street grid. Drawing on textual and empirical evidence, this study seeks to understand if the city grid, its main thoroughfares, and the orientation of its buildings were influenced by the desire to connect to important topographical features such as the cave of Apollo. The reconstitution of these dynamics into a synthetic urban topography requires the collation of incomplete evidence from a variety of different sources and time periods, including historical accounts, numismatics, inscriptions found on the site, architectural remains, geographical surveys, and the preservation of toponyms in local memory. This project makes use of procedural modeling, an emerging 3D mapping technique that facilitates the generation of hypothetical three-dimensional visualizations based on geographically located data to explore a series of focused questions about the impact of cultic practice and landscape on the urban layout of Magnesia on the Maeander. The first set of questions is spatio-empirical in nature, and concerns the reconstruction of Magnesia’s city plan. The second seeks to elucidate a ‘topography of ritual’ at Magnesia and explore the ways in which this network of natural places and religious sites coexisted with, and undermined, the spatial system constituted by the city grid. The idea of the cave and its role in Greek architecture is the third object of study, as represented at Magnesia by the sanctuary of Apollo. Finally, these questions form a case study for a critique of the value and potential of the procedural modeling methodology. As a whole, the project aims to contribute to knowledge of the landscape and built environment of Asia Minor in the archaic through Roman periods, as well as entering into discourses of theory and praxis in the Digital Humanities. iii The dissertation of Marie Saldaña is approved. Sylvia Lavin Michael Osman Chris Johanson Diane Favro, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2015 iv DEDICATION To my parents, and Ashley v TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1: Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Disciplinary Framework ....................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Research Themes .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.1 The City Plan ................................................................................................................. 4 1.2.2 The Topography of Ritual .............................................................................................. 5 1.2.3 The Cave ........................................................................................................................ 6 1.2.4 Procedural Holistic Urban Modeling ............................................................................. 8 1.3 Structure ................................................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 2: Historical Topography of Magnesia............................................................................ 10 2.1 Archaeology at Magnesia ................................................................................................... 11 2.2 The Archaic Period (800 BC – 479 BC) ............................................................................. 13 2.3 The Classical Period (480 BC – 322 BC) ........................................................................... 16 2.4 The Hellenistic Period (323 BC – 145 BC) ........................................................................ 18 2.5 The Roman Period .............................................................................................................. 22 2.6 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 24 Chapter 3: The Cave, the Tree, and the City................................................................................. 26 3.1 The Cave of Apollo at Hylai ............................................................................................... 27 3.2 Cult of Dionysos ................................................................................................................. 33 vi 3.3 Connection between Apollo of the Cave and Dionysos in the City ................................... 38 3.4 Chthonic and Underground Cults at Magnesia ................................................................... 41 3.5 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 45 Chapter 4: Methodology: Procedural Modeling for Holistic Urban Reconstruction ................... 46 4.1 Previous Work in 3D Architectural Reconstruction ........................................................... 47 4.1.1 Non-Procedural Modeling Techniques ........................................................................ 47 4.1.2 Background of Procedural Modeling ........................................................................... 50 4.1.3 Choosing a 3D modeling technique ............................................................................. 53 4.1.4 Criteria for Analysis ..................................................................................................... 54 4.2 Creating the Roman City Ruleset ....................................................................................... 55 4.2.1 Reconstructing Terrain ................................................................................................. 56 4.2.2 Geospatial Data ............................................................................................................ 58 4.2.3 Encoding Architecture ................................................................................................. 59 4.2.4 Use and Documentation of Sources ............................................................................. 66 4.3 Application to Research Questions ..................................................................................... 69 4.3.1 Augustan Rome ............................................................................................................ 69 4.3.2 RomeLab ...................................................................................................................... 71 4.3.3 Modeling Magnesia ..................................................................................................... 72 4.4 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 75 Chapter 5: Towards an Experimental 3D Reconstruction of the City .......................................... 77 vii 5.1 (Re-)Drawing the City Grid ................................................................................................ 78 5.1.1 Problems of the evidence ............................................................................................. 78 5.1.2 Previous Interpretations ............................................................................................... 79 5.1.3 Proposed Dimensions of the Insulae ............................................................................ 81 5.1.4 Division of the Insulae into House Lots ...................................................................... 85 5.1.5 Extent of the City, Number of Blocks and Population ................................................ 86 5.1.6 The Major Streets ......................................................................................................... 87 5.2 Modeling the Space of Ritual ............................................................................................. 90 5.2.1 The Path of the Dendrophoroi ..................................................................................... 91 5.2.2 Subverting
Recommended publications
  • Evidence for West Greek Influence on Mainland Greek Roof Construction and the Creation of the Truss in the Archaic Period

    Evidence for West Greek Influence on Mainland Greek Roof Construction and the Creation of the Truss in the Archaic Period

    EVIDENCE FOR WEST GREEK INFLUENCE ON MAINLAND GREEK ROOF CONSTRUCTION AND THE CREATION OF THE TRUSS IN THE ARCHAIC PERIOD T HE DETERMINATION OF REGIONAL STYLES is a recognized part of Greek archi- tectural studies.1 Such discussionshave focused on ground plans, use of refinements,or ways in which architects solved specific problems common to all buildings.2 This study introduces roof design as another means of recognizing regional building practices, as expressed in the form and function of the geison. Because of the geison's position at the top of the entablature and the edge of the roof geison design reflects both the technical and the decorative aspects of the building and provides positive evidence concerning roof construction. Since wood from ancient Greek buildings is not commonly preserved, the woodwork of the ceiling and roof must be reconstructed from indirect evidence, such as the cuttings in stone members of the entablature and tympanum. In particular,the rafter beams generally came into contact with the lateral geison3 (Fig. 1). The most thorough study of this subject is Trevor Hodge's book, The Woodworkof GreekRoofs (1960). On the basis of his own survey of extant geison blocks, Hodge recognized two basic forms, the flat- topped and the sloping-topped geison, each with severalsubtypes. But while Hodge acknowledged the diversity of forms, he maintained that the distribution of types of geison blocks revealed no chronological or geographical pattern.4 The present study reexamines preserved geison forms from the Greek mainland and Sicily and brings new observations to bear on two specific areas of Greek architecture:the identificationof a West Greek style of roof design and the role of Sicilian architectsin the creation of a tie-beam truss.
  • Appendix D – Glossary of Architectural Terms

    Appendix D – Glossary of Architectural Terms

    APPENDIX D – GLOSSARY OF ARCHITECTURAL TERMS Arbor – a shelter of shrubs and Appendix D branches or of latticework intertwined with climbing vines and flowers Glossary of Arcade – a covered porch supported Architectural Terms by columns and joined by arches The following is a listing of commonly used architectural terms. Project applicants should utilize this glossary to familiarize themselves with the common terms used when describing architectural styles, features and techniques. Example of arcade Arches – Basket – an arch with a flat top like the shape of a basket handle. Flat – an arch with a flat, horizontal underside. Pointed – an arch ending in a central point. Photo courtesy Guy Ball Round – half-circle arch. Accent Colors – the accent color is Segmented – an arch formed used to highlight small details on by only part of a circle. window hoods, cornices, columns, and bulkheads. Arch head – a round-arch top to a doorway or window. Adobe – sun dried earth, generally with a straw binder, often shaped into Archivolt molding – trim, usually bricks by hand or in forms, or used masonry, edging an arch; commonly directly as a mortar or “plaster” finish. found in Gothic and Romanesque design. Anchor bolt – any various rods or bolts embedded in masonry or concrete to Ashlar – stone that has been cut and hold, secure, or support a structural dressed with even edges. There may member be a variety of surface finishes. SANTA ANA CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES PAGE D – 1 APPENDIX D – GLOSSARY OF ARCHITECTURAL TERMS Attic – a room or space directly under the roof of a building, esp. a house.
  • HERITAGE IMPACT STATEMENT 70 Cronulla Street, Cronulla

    HERITAGE IMPACT STATEMENT 70 Cronulla Street, Cronulla

    HERITAGE IMPACT STATEMENT 70 Cronulla Street, Cronulla 70 Cronulla Street, Cronulla APRIL 2018 NBRS & PARTNERS Pty Ltd Level 3, 4 Glen Street Milsons Point NSW 2061 Australia Telephone +61 2 9922 2344 - Facsimile +61 2 9922 1308 ABN: 16 002 247 565 Nominated Architects Geoffrey Deane: Reg No. 3766; Andrew Duffin: Reg No. 5602; Garry Hoddinett: Reg No 5286 This report has been prepared under the guidance of the Expert Witness Code of Conduct in the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules and the provisions relating to expert evidence This document remains the property of NBRS & PARTNERS Pty Ltd. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was produced. Unauthorised use of the document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. ISSUED REVIEW ISSUED BY 19 February 2018 Draft for Review Sophie Bock 3 March 2018 Final Sophie Bock 9 April 2018 Amended Final Sophie Bock CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 Background ......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Methodology ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Site Location ....................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4 Heritage Management Framework................................................................................................
  • The American Vignola

    The American Vignola

    I THE AMERICAN VIGNOLA PART I THE FIVE ORDERS By WILLIAM R. WARE FORMERLY PROFESSOR OF ARCHITECTURE IN MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF ARCHITECTURE IN COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY FIFTH EDITION SCRANTON INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY 1920 COPYRIGHT, 1902, BY WILLIAM R. WARE COPYRIGHT, 1904, BY INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY All rights reserved PRESS OF INTERNATIONAL TEXTBOOK COMPANY SCRANTON, PA. 78282 PREFACE January, 1859, I went from Mr. Edward Cabot's office in Boston, where I had been for two or three IN years, to join the little company of half a dozen young men who were studying architecture in the Studio Building in Tenth Street, under the inspiration of Mr. Richard Hunt. Mr. Hunt had just returned from Paris and was to to we were not much his what he had learned in / eager impart younger men, though juniors, the Ecole des Beaux-Arts and in work upon the New Louvre. We had all, I believe, had more or less of office experience, but those were the days when the Gothic Revival was at its height, and Mr. Hunt found most of Classical us unfamiliar with details and quite unskilled in their use. I, at any rate, knew hardly a touch of them, and I remember well the day when, as I was carefully drawing out a Doric Capital according to the measurements given in my Vignola, Mr. Hunt took the pencil out of my hand and, setting aside the whole appa- ratus of Modules and Minutes, showed me how to divide the height of my Capital into thirds, and those into and those into thirds, again thirds, thus getting the sixths, ninths, eighteenths, twenty-sevenths, and fifty- fourths of a Diameter which the rules required, without employing any larger divisor than two or three.
  • Historic Building Proportions

    Historic Building Proportions

    ILLUSTRATED GLOSSARY Arch- A curved or pointed opening in a wall. Architrave- The lowest part of the molding on a classical entablature. More commonly used to describe the decorative millwork around a door or window. Balustrade- A railing or parapet supported by a row of balusters. Bargeboard (or Rakeboard/ Verge-board)- The decorative board along the edge of a gable concealing the rafters. 3-bay versus 5-bay Bay- The number of openings in the principle façade for a given story, or the spaces between members in a structural system. Bay Window- An element projecting from an exterior wall surface containing windows and often forming a recess in the interior space. Beaded- (as in “beaded clapboard”)- A decorative flourish made with a specially shaped blade on a hand-plane, which applies a single groove near the edge of a board, leaving a rounded “beaded” 91 edge. Often seen on the exterior clapboards of Federal period frame homes in Washington. Belt Course- Slightly raised or projecting courses partway up a brick wall; usually located between stories. Bracket- A wooden or stone decorative support beneath a projecting floor, window or cornice. Capitol- The decorative top of a column or pilaster. Various capitol designs and proportions are based upon the classical Orders. Castellation- Alternating gaps in the upper edge of a parapet, originally to allow defenders cover under siege, also called “crenelation.” A decorative element in Gothic Revival architecture. May become necessary again if the economy worsens. Column- A vertical support, usually supporting a member above. Coping- The top course of a wall which covers and protects the wall from the effects of weather.