San Bruno Mountain Self Guided Tour

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

San Bruno Mountain Self Guided Tour San Bruno Mountain Self-guided Tour San Bruno Mountain Park is a landmark of local and regional significance, standing as a unique open-space island in the midst of the peninsula's urbanization at the northern end of the Santa Cruz Mountain Range. The Mountain's ridge line runs in an east-west configuration, with considerable slopes and elevations ranging from 250 feet to 1,314 feet at the summit. The 2,416 acres of rugged landscape offer excellent hiking opportunities and outstanding views of San Francisco and Central Bay Area. Daly City BART Station Self-guided Tour Routes (Approximate Time): O y a to Mission St to Geneva Ave. a Wa k to Geneva Ave. ist r Saddle Trail to Youth Camp Trail: D1.75aly miles (45 minutes) V i John Blvd d a d Blv lt C A g a l e r l t Saddle Trail: 2.64 miles (1.5 hours) i Tra e to le il A H 1 r 280 d d v a h S 0.7 e San Bruno Mountain State and County Park Ridge Trail: 2.73 miles (2 hours) t u l i S o a t C S Edward Bacciocco, Jr. ro Cr r DALY CITY ck o 0.2 T Martin St er Ave cke 2 Group Area LEGEND r A 5 3 p to San Francisco ve m S Pointe 0.4 a ad DALY CITY Pacific O il C dl ld a e A. Plants and Wildowers: 0.2 r T Multiple-use trail Parking T 4 B 1.3 r G pe 6 th a (bicycle, equestrian, and hiking) uadalu u il Main St The park’s principal natural resources include 14 species of Co 7 o Restrooms lm Y Hiking/biking trail a 0.3 Bog y 0.4 e dl Trail w THE SADDLE d rare or endangered plants, as well as host and nectar plantsMission St a Gu k 0.3 S ad Picnic area P Cree alu Hiking/equestrian road k k A pe T n o r 8 Ca of endangered butterflies. San Bruno Mountain is renowned o ro a nyo y B T 0.5 il Old n Gatehouse Hillside Blvd Hillside n p ra 10 Pkwy Hiking/equestrian trail a o il C o 9 for its amazing array of wildflowers such as the California L 400 e 0.7 t R Hiking trail Abbot P 11 Gate p i Park Entrance a G Bonnie lu W n U A a m ax c D A Poppy, Crimson or Humminbird Sage, Reddened Clarkia, and d M h L U a m P Service road u u y r E Amphitheater G S Road 14 rt Ro t D H I Hillside Park le ad o L Wild Iris. Native flowers, including California Poppies and Trail sp L S o R r 400 San Francisco Bay Trail l 800 i a e Radio tower i C 0.1 v v d l 82 r 0.5 13 12 in i several species of Lupine, grow in abundance, but their Price p a 0.2 e S C A E R S u SEE h C c u aly e 0.2 Trail distance (miles) p c Other public lands Price a m tu Summit s k b DETAIL H M 15 rail ill i e existence is increasingly threatened by invasive non-native m Tr t ssi l T 0.3 a s on r e i e Blue Dr e l s 0.4 D i W t MAP p R n Private property r 1 2 i o Numbered trail junctions a Loop t plants like the Thorned Scottish Yellow Gorse, Eucalyptus v 16 e v a 0.4 n D Loop i i r R n v r T e a M D y rail R Trees, and wildflowers like Sweet Pea. t o T r S i y n t 2.0 rail V e r 400 al a l rk a i ley l a a o rc i East Market St M D y D 17 D ro r h H to San Francisco d r Br D R 0.2 A isb r rth o s an No r 20 il e d v Re e 19 18 e Sou c P E t re h l D H a n ill ti a R o S C i Dr n a d B. Wildlife: H 800 T m g r Lagoon Rd i e a V l i unnel Rd i l l a T l to n s le T 280 r Endangered and threatenedo butterflyid species such y a e D i r R 0.4 San Bruno Mountain l e B 1314' as the San Bruno Elfin, Missiona Blue,lv Callippe l d P Colma ark BART Ln Sierra P Silverspot, and Bay Checkerspot are found in only a P D C San Francisco Bay Station e o in Guadalupe un v 21 t Bayshore F a 22 Quarry ld y Rd R 0.1 California O Brisbane few places in the world, and San Bruno Mountain is n bia Department of Lagoon oint Pkwy Edward Bacciocco, Jr. er one of them. Another threatened species, the San S Fish and Game Ave PARK Group Area 0 0.1 mile 0.9 San Bruno ENTRANCE E Francisco Tree Lupine Moth, 0.1was known to inhabit Ridge Trail AREA 0 100 meters reeway n isitacion continues off V the area, but urban development3 destroyed this o Ave San Bruno Mountain y n BRISBANE n o map a y C Caltrain 200' 4 l n population. State and County Park w a 5 C O e e y n e 6 Y i k o c v u u a B 0.1 t C. Radio Road: R h A Habitat Conservation Plan, adopted in the 0.3 e g k C Sightseeing is also popular on San a Ridge O ee a mid-1980's, now ensures the protection of S r e m l T C d n 101 i 0.8 rail p Bruno Mountain. Radio Road, v a a G e endangered species and their habitats on the Bog R n u T THE SADDLE l lm i i a r a COLMA v Co a r leading up fromHillside theBlvd main entrance, (City of Brisbane) 0.4 d a a i T k Mountain. Other resident animalsl include various e R l n S O u n U 0.3 y a i T p a v h H T e T E l w offers visitors the opportunity to g r e d a A S k u a d r R T species of snakes and lizards, coyotes, racoons, o a a to Brisbane i T S r R l r P I 0.4 a T D B i drive to the summit of the Mountain s G og l n u E rabbits, and many types T of birds suchgrass as songbirdso c w ra o 0.4 il area y n n u C 1000 a and enjoy breathtaking views north d 250' J Si Blv C er and birds of prey. to Daly City ra nt 9 Poi Sierra 10 e il p Tra to Mt. Tamalpais, east to Mt. Diablo Point u 11 l d Marina a a d Park P a o C and west to the Farallon Islands. R u a entrance G b Main h 400 l c 800 e 0.1 parking n R a a R v i d S n l Lawndale Blvd o e O mit Lo ad uth op Ro um underpass Jefferson St S Bayshore Blvd S 13 an o di 0.1 D Fran a 0.1 12 airy cisc R R Hillside Blvd o to summit 14 Native Plant av Dr 0.5 ine N 0.2 Garden Trailhead Mandala P parking y P Ave l 15 0 Eu Trail 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 mile cal Summit yp SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Sister Cities Blvd nc L tus Trail 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 kilometer n Fra isco oo Sa B p ay Chestnut rail T 10” x 14” 10” x 14” 10” x 14” San Bruno Mtn rev 09/15/17 v4.ai D. Nike Missile: A number of radio and microwave transmitters can be seen today on the summit of San Bruno Mountain. San Bruno Mountain played a strategic role in the history of the military during WWII. U.S. Army Signal Corps forces used the area during WWII, establishing a signaling operation in a small cluster of buildings in the saddle area. Daly City BART Station O Aircraft searchlights, capable of illuminating the skies in case of an y a to Mission St to Geneva Ave. a Wa k to Geneva Ave. ist r Daly V i John Blvd d a d Blv lt C air attack, were also installed near the summit. At the summit are A g a l e r l t i Tra e to le il A 280 H d 1 r also the remains of an old Nike Missile early warning radar site. This d v a h S 0.7 e San Bruno Mountain State and County Park t u l i S o was used as a defensive system during the Cold War. This radar, a t C S Edward Bacciocco, Jr.
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of Butterfly Survey Data and Methodology from San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan (1982–2000)
    Analysis of Butterfly Survey Data and Methodology from San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan (1982–2000) 1. Status and Trends Travis Longcore Christine S. Lam John P. Wilson University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory Technical Report No. 1 Prepared for: Thomas Reid Associates 560 Waverly Street, Suite 201 Palo Alto, California 94301 Cover Photo: Lupines at San Bruno Mountain, March 2003 (T. Longcore) Preferred Citation: Longcore, T., C. S. Lam, and J. P. Wilson. 2004. Analysis of Butterfly Survey Data and Meth- odology from San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan (1982–2000). 1. Status and Trends. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sus- tainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. Summary Managers surveyed for sensitive butterfly species with the San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan area between 1982 and 2000 using a haphazard “wandering tran- sect.” To extract as much valuable information as possible from the data collected by this suboptimal methodology we analyzed patterns of surveys and butterfly presence and absence within 250 m square cells gridded across the area within a Geographic In- formation System. While estimates of butterfly abundance were not possible, the data could be tested for trends in butterfly occupancy. For those cells surveyed during at least 10 years, no trends in the total number of occupied cells was evident for either Callippe silverspot butterfly or mission blue butterfly. There were cells, however, that showed positive or negative trends (p<0.2) in occupancy for each species (Callippe sil- verspot butterfly: 14 positive, 15 negative, 6 cells occupied all years; mission blue but- terfly: 40 positive; 40 negative, 2 cells occupied all years).
    [Show full text]
  • San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan
    SAN BRUNO MOUNTAIN HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Year 2006 Activities Report For Endangered Species Permit PRT-2-9818 Submitted to the United States Fish and Wildlife Service by the County of San Mateo February 2007 San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan -- 2006 Activities Report TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY .................................................................................................................................................... iii SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 4 II. STATUS OF SPECIES OF CONCERN ................................................................................. 4 A. Mission Blue Butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) ................................................ 5 B. Callippe Silverspot Butterfly (Speyeria callippe callippe) ................................................ 5 C. San Bruno Elfin (Callophrys mossii bayensis) ................................................................ 10 D. Butterfly Monitoring Recommendations for 2006 .......................................................... 13 E. Bay Checkerspot Butterfly (Euphydryas editha bayensis ............................................... 13 F. San Francisco Garter Snake (Thamnophis sirtalis tetrataenia) ....................................... 14 G. California Red-legged
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Butterfly Habitat Restorations
    Planning Butterfly Habitat Restorations Kim R. Mason Introduction Ecologists and entomologists in Britain and the United States have participated in numerous projects aimed at restoring, expanding, and mitigating losses of habitat for native butterflies. Some of these butterflies have been listed as threatened or endangered; others have been lost or are in decline in certain portions of their former ranges. The experiences and observations of these scientists illustrate potential needs and concerns when planning to restore or improve existing butterfly habitat. This paper will relate several cases in which complex biotic and abiotic interactions played important roles in the success or failure of butterfly habitat restoration and the reestablishment of butterfly populations. Although each butterfly species has its own unique combination of habitat requirements and life history, some fundamental principles concerning butterfly biology (New 1991) are significant in planning habitat restorations. Most caterpillars are herbivores, and many are specialists which feed on only one kind or a few related kinds of plants. Therefore, the presence of appropriate larval host plants is the primary requirement of habitat restoration. In addition, many butterfly species require that the larval food plant be in a particular growth stage, of a certain height, exposed to the proper amount of sunlight, or in close proximity to another resource. Adults typically utilize a wider range of plants or other resources as food, and flight gives them expanded mobility. However, adult dispersal ability varies from species to species. For some, physical features such as a few meters of open space, a stream, a hedge, or a change in gradient create intrinsic barriers to dispersal; other species routinely migrate long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Cruz County San Mateo County
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. M A Y - 2 0 1 0 Table of Contents Executive Summary.............................................................................................................1 Purpose.................................................................................................................................2 Background & Collaboration...............................................................................................3 The Landscape .....................................................................................................................6 The Wildfire Problem ..........................................................................................................8 Fire History Map................................................................................................................10 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................11 Reducing Structural Ignitability.........................................................................................12 x Construction Methods............................................................................................13 x Education ...............................................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared By
    Santa Cruz County San Mateo County COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PROTECTION PLAN Prepared by: CALFIRE, San Mateo — Santa Cruz Unit The Resource Conservation District for San Mateo County and Santa Cruz County Funding provided by a National Fire Plan grant from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service through the California Fire Safe Council. APRIL - 2 0 1 8 Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 3 Background & Collaboration ............................................................................................... 4 The Landscape .................................................................................................................... 7 The Wildfire Problem ........................................................................................................10 Fire History Map ............................................................................................................... 13 Prioritizing Projects Across the Landscape .......................................................................14 Reducing Structural Ignitability .........................................................................................16 • Construction Methods ........................................................................................... 17 • Education .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • And Mission Blue Butterfly Populations Found at Milagra Ridge and the Mission Blue Butterfly Population at Marin Headlands Are Managed by the GGNRA
    San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission Blue Butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Patrick Kobernus: Adult male mission blue butterfly. Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Field Office U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento, California February 2010 5-YEAR REVIEW San Bruno Elfin Butterfly (Callophrys mossii bayensis) and Mission blue butterfly (Icaricia icarioides missionensis) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. Our original listing of a species as endangered or threatened is based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of a species. In the 5-year review, we consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed or last reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo
    Unit Strategic Fire Plan San Mateo - Santa Cruz Cloverdale VMP - 2010 6/15/2011 Table of Contents SIGNATURE PAGE ................................................................................................................................ 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ 3 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW UNIT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 4 UNIT PREPAREDNESS AND FIREFIGHTING CAPABILITIES................................................. 8 SECTION II: COLLABORATION DEVELOPMENT TEAM ........................................................................................................... 12 SECTION III: VALUES AT RISK IDENTIFICATION OF ASSETS AT RISK ................................................................................ 15 COMMUNITIES AT RISK ........................................................................................................ 17 SECTION IV: PRE FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES FIRE PREVENTION ................................................................................................................. 18 ENGINEERING & STRUCTURE IGNITABILITY ............................................................... 19 INFORMATION AND EDUCATION .................................................................................. 22 VEGETATION MANAGEMENT .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mission Blue DRAFT Recovery Plan
    http://fwie.fw.vt.edu/WWW/esis/lists/e501011.htm (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species BUTTERFLY, BLUE, MISSION Species Id ESIS501011 Date 13 MAR 96 TAXONOMY NAME - BUTTERFLY, BLUE, MISSION OTHER COMMON NAMES - BUTTERFLY, BLUE, MISSION; BLUE and MISSION ELEMENT CODE - CATEGORY - Terrestrial Insects PHYLUM AND SUBPHYLUM - ARTHROPODA, CLASS AND SUBCLASS - INSECTA, ORDER AND SUBORDER - LEPIDOPTERA, FAMILY AND SUBFAMILY - LYCAENIDAE, GENUS AND SUBGENUS - ICARICIA, SPECIES AND SSP - ICARIOIDES, MISSIONENSIS SCIENTIFIC NAME - ICARICIA ICARIOIDES MISSIONENSIS AUTHORITY - TAXONOMY REFERENCES - COMMENTS ON TAXONOMY - Mission Blue Butterfly Icaricia icarioides missionensis (Hovanitz, 1937) KINGDOM: Animal GROUP: Insect PHYLUM: Arthropoda CLASS: Insecta ORDER: Lepidoptera FAMILY: Lycaenidae The taxon Icaricia (Plebejus) icarioides missionensis appears to be a phenotypic intermediate between darkly marked "inland" populations referred to as subspecies I. i. pardalis and populations on the immediate coast which sport extremely pale ventral wing surfaces called subspecies I. i. pheres. Because pardalis phenotypes effectively surround the original distribution of I. i. pheres (now extinct in San Francisco), the subspecies I. i. missionensis may well be polyphylectic in origin, having arisen independently north and south of the center of I. i. pheres distribution. Thus the present "continuous" distribution of the Mission blue is an artifact of the disappearance of I. i. pheres. This taxon may be identified by comparison with illustrations of Icaricia (Plebejus) icarioides missionensis on Plate 59 (Fig.1 and 2) of "The butterflies of North America" (03). The black spotting of the ventral aspect of the male is slightly more intense than average. The Taxonomy - 1 (DRAFT) - Taxonomy Species BUTTERFLY, BLUE, MISSION Species Id ESIS501011 Date 13 MAR 96 following is the original description of the Mission blue butterfly (02,04): "Upper surface of wings: Male, blue with black border and white fringes; anal angle and body clothed with white hair.
    [Show full text]
  • DA-04-2523A1.Pdf
    Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 August 12, 2004 DA 04-2523 Released: August 13, 2004 1800E3-JLB KNTV License Inc. c/o Meridith S. Senter, Esq. Leventhal Senter & Lerman, PLLC 2000 K Street, N.W. Suite 600 Washington, D.C. 20006 Young Broadcasting of San Francisco, Inc. c/o Wade H. Hargrove, Esq. Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, LLP Post Office Box 1800 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 KTVU Partnership c/o Kevin F. Reed, Esq. Dow, Lohnes & Albertson, PLLC 1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 Re: Applications of KNTV Licensee Inc. For Minor Modifications in Licensed Facilities for KNTV(TV) and KNTV-DT, San Jose, California; Fac. ID 35280 File Nos. BPCT-20031001AKF and BPCDT-20031001AKO Dear Licensees: This is with respect to the above-referenced applications for minor modification to the licensed analog and digital facilities of KNTV(TV), channel 11, and KNTV-DT, channel 12, San Jose, California, licensed to KNTV License Inc. (NBC). NBC proposes to move its analog and digital facilities from Loma Prieta Mountain, a location southwest of San Jose, to the antenna farm located between San Jose and San Francisco on San Bruno Mountain. Young Broadcasting of San Francisco, Inc. (Young), the licensee of station KRON-TV, San Francisco, filed an informal objection against both applications. KTVU Partnership (KTVU), the licensee of KTVU(TV), Oakland, California, KICU-TV, San Jose, California, and KRXI-TV, Reno, Nevada, filed an informal objection to the KNTV(TV) application. The DTV modification application satisfies all of the Commission’s rules, including the principal community coverage requirement of 43dBu for channels 7 though 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Endangered Butterflies on San Bruno Mountain
    J Insect Conserv DOI 10.1007/s10841-010-9263-9 ORIGINAL PAPER Extracting useful data from imperfect monitoring schemes: endangered butterflies at San Bruno Mountain, San Mateo County, California (1982–2000) and implications for habitat management Travis Longcore • Christine S. Lam • Patrick Kobernus • Eben Polk • John P. Wilson Received: 29 April 2009 / Accepted: 7 January 2010 Ó The Author(s) 2010. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Managers surveyed for sensitive butterfly spe- indicates that those areas with declines in occupancy for cies in the San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan these species experienced native coastal scrub succession area between 1982 and 2000 using an opportunistic and a corresponding loss in grassland butterfly habitat, ‘‘wandering transect’’ method. To extract as much valuable while positive trending and stable cells had stable grassland information as possible from the data collected by this proportions. Habitat managers at San Bruno Mountain method we analyzed patterns of surveys and butterfly should therefore incorporate programs for protecting presence and absence within 250 m square cells gridded grassland butterfly habitat not only from invasive weeds across the area within a Geographic Information System. but also from succession to native coastal scrub. This While estimates of butterfly abundance were not possible, approach illustrates the feasibility of using occupancy as an the data could be tested for trends in butterfly occupancy. indicator to track butterfly status in a protected area even For those cells surveyed during at least 10 years, no trends when suboptimal data collection methods are used, but the in the total number of occupied cells was evident for either difficulties of using these data also reinforces the need for Callippe silverspot or mission blue butterfly.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Grossberg
    Patrick Kobernus Principal EDUCATION M.S. Ecology California State University, East Bay TECHNICAL CAPABILITIES & EXPERIENCE Patrick Kobernus is the owner of Coast Ridge Ecology, and has over 18 years of experience as a professional wildlife biologist. He currently manages a staff of six biologists and environmental specialists. He is experienced in supervising biological monitoring crews, conducting endangered species monitoring and rare plant mapping, and overseeing habitat management and restoration projects including invasive species control, grazing, controlled burning, and replanting projects. Since 2010, Mr. Kobernus has served as the Lead Biologist for the Crystal Springs /San Andreas Transmission System Upgrade Project, Crystal Springs Pipeline No. 2 Project, Lower Crystal Springs Dam Improvement Project, Harry Tracy Water Treatment Long Term Improvement Project and the SFPUC Bioregional Habitat Restoration Program. Mr. Kobernus conducted extensive surveys and consulted on mitigation efforts for California red-legged frog, San Francisco garter snake, western pond turtle, steelhead, San Francisco dusky-footed woodrat, nesting birds and roosting bats. Mr. Kobernus has extensive experience with rare animal and plant species in northern and central California, including San Bruno elfin butterfly, Callippe silverspot butterfly, Smith’s blue butterfly, Myrtle’s silverspot butterfly, California tiger salamander, northern spotted owl, burrowing owl, several local bat species, and several local serpentine endemic plant species. Mr. Kobernus served as the Habitat Manager for the San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan in San Mateo County for 13 years (1995-2007). He has worked extensively within the San Francisco Bay Area, conducting biological assessments and USFWS protocol surveys for protected species within San Francisco, Santa Clara, San Mateo, and San Benito Counties, and electrofishing and trapping surveys for steelhead in San Mateo, Alameda, and Santa Clara Counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Including UC, Stanford, Mills, SF State and Many Private and Junior
    KQED History Date Description Mar 22, 1951 Representatives of all public school districts in 7 Bay Area Counties (Not SF) including UC, Stanford, Mills, SF State and many private and junior colleges meet to support FcC proposed rule setting aside Channel 9 for non- conmercial, educational use. Sep 4 | 1951 Bay Area Public Schools Television Council and the Bay Area Educational Television Committee sends a petition to FCc requesting reservation of Channel 9 (as proposed in rulemaking) and argluing vehemently against a cBS Proposal that a IJIIF channel be given to the educational broadcasters in San Francisco. Vaughn D. Seidel argues that it would be practically impossible to obtain public interest or capital funds if they were to be rfshuntedff to UHF. rfVaughn Seidel . .. was without any doubt the founder of KQED. Starting in the very early '50s when educational, nonconmercial television was a brand new idea, Dr. Seidel, then supervisor of schools for Alameda County, saw the potential of nonconmercial television when most educators in Bay Area media still scof fed at the whole idea. rf Focus 3 /7e Jun L2, L952 Bay Area Educational Television Association (BAETA) incorporation papers f iled rt. to stimulate and advance education by telecast. ff . Principal off ice is at the County Court House, L225 Fallon Street, Odk1and. Vaughn Seidel named President. George A. Pettitt (VP UC Berkeley) named Vice President. , JUI 28, L952 BAETA discusses the various options for going on air. The feasibility of purghasing the KPIX facifities, setting up a new facility on San Bruno Mountain that is currently also being used by NBC and KRON-TV (San Bruno, incidentally, was owned by the Crocker Estate) , setting up on Mt.
    [Show full text]