DOCSLIB.ORG

Title: Milwaukee County Expressway Commission Reference Code

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Title: Milwaukee County Expressway Commission Reference Code Title: Milwaukee County Expressway Commission Reference Code: Mss-2002 Inclusive Dates: 1946-1980 Bulk: 70.8 cu. ft. total Location: WHS A001-A008 (52.5 cu. ft.) GV, Sh. 52 (7.8 cu. ft.) LM, Sh. 188-189 (4.8 cu. ft.) HH, Sh. 023-024 (3.4 cu. ft.) MV, F9 and F35 (1.0 cu. ft.) LS, Sh. 077 (1.3 cu. ft.) OS SM “M” (3 items) Abstract: The Milwaukee County Department of Public Works provided staff and services for the Milwaukee County Expressway Commission during its 26 years of existence (1953-1980). Scope and Content: The collection consists of preliminary plans, progress reports, various traffic surveys and studies for the Milwaukee metropolitan area, as well as studies, surveys, and reports specific to sections of the county freeway system, including Lake, Park, Stadium, Bay, and Belt Freeways and their interchanges, extensions, and bridges. Part I of this finding aid consists of plans, progress reports, surveys, and studies prepared for or about the Metropolitan Milwaukee area freeway system. There are also photos and slides taken during the freeway construction. Part II contains an incomplete collection of appraisal report files received from the Milwaukee County Expressway Commission during 1978 and 1979. Part III deals with unprocessed project numbered boxes received from the Milwaukee County Department of Public Works. Notes: Collection added to by Steve Daily, May 2, 1996, and updated by Kevin Abing, June 9, 1999 & August 13, 2002 Arrangement: Folder Heading Box # Divider # NOTE: Boxes 1 – 4 located at LM, Sh. 188-189 PRELIMINARY PLANS 1946-52 1 1 − Origin-Destination Traffic Study Milwaukee Metropolitan Area, 1946 − Major Trafficways Milwaukee Metropolitan Area 1949 − Preliminary Plan for Milwaukee Expressways, 1952 ANNUAL REPORTS 1953-79 1 2 - MCEC First Annual Report 1954 - Milwaukee County Department of Public Works 1955 Report - MCEC Second Annual Report 1955 - MCEC Third Annual Report 1956 - MCEC Fourth Annual Report 1957 - MCEC Annual Report 1958 - MCEC Interim Progress Report 1/1/58-3/31/58 - MCEC Interim Report on Proposed Extensions of Expressway System - MCEC Annual Report 1959 - MCEC Downtown Expressways Supplementary Report 1959 - MCEC Annual Report 1960 - MCEC Annual Report 1961 - MCEC Quarterly Report 4/1/61-6/30/61 - MCEC Annual Report 1962 - Report to Legislative Committee MCE System Progress - MCEC 10th Annual Report 1963 - MCEC Annual Report 1964 - MCEC Annual Report 1965 - MCEC Annual Report 1966 - MCEC Annual Report 1967 - MCEC Annual Report 1968 - MCEC Annual Report 1969 - MCEC Annual Report 1970 - MCEC Annual Report 1971 - MCEC Annual Report 1972 - MCEC 20th Annual Report 1973 - MCEC Annual Report 1974 - MCEC Annual Report 1975 - MCEC Annual Report 1976 - MCEC Annual Report 1977 - MCEC 25th Anniversary Annual Report 1978 - MCEC 26th Annual Report 1979 GENERAL TRAFFIC ANALYSIS 1 3 - MCEC Traffic Analysis July 1957 - MCEC Interstate Distribution Loop Study December 1962 - MCEC 1990 Milwaukee Freeway Traffic Analysis June 1965 AIRPORT SPUR 1 4 - Airport Spur Location Study Report June 20 1969 - Noise Impact Study of the Airport Spur Vol. I - Air Terminal 1977 Traffic Forecast. April 1968 LAKE FREEWAY AND SOUTHERLY EXTENSION 1 5 - MCEC Lake Front Expressway March 1963 - MCEC Lake Freeway Southerly Extension Location Report October 1966 - Lake Freeway Boring Logs - MCEC Station 25+00 to Station 61+50 Preliminary Plan - MCEC Station 25+00 to Station 108+85 Preliminary Design Report 1967 - Station 790+00 to Station 834+70 Preliminary Design Report, 1968 - Report on Proposed Use of Low Level Lighting on the Lake Freeway - Special Study For Embankment at E. Lincoln Ave to S. Conway St - Supplement to Study For Embankment at E. Lincoln Ave to S. Conway St - MCEC Lake Freeway Layton Ave to Kinnickinnic Ave - Federal Highway Administration Lake Freeway Evaluation Study 1972 - MCEC E. Holt Ave to E. Iron St Master Plans December 1969 LAKE FREEWAY AND SOUTHERLY EXTENSION (CONTINUED) 1A 5 - MCEC Site Investigation Report Carferry Drive Overpass - MCEC Architectural and Environmental Concerns January 1973 - Railroad Alternate Preliminary Soils Investigation - Railroad Alternative Plans and Environment Assessment Report - Preliminary Environmental Impact Analysis Railroad Alternatives II - Economic Impact Study Addenda for Railroad Alternate Phase 1 - Lakefront Expressway Clippings - The Lake Freeway Plan: An Interstate Connection to the Port of Milwaukee, July 1965 - Station 25+00 to Station 108+85 Preliminary Design Report, 1967 WAR MEMORIAL AREA 2 1 - Master Plans - War Memorial Bridge Preliminary Plans HOAN (HARBOR) BRIDGE 2 2 - Boring Logs Milwaukee Harbor Bridge - Drainage System Plan - Study of Low-Level Lighting - Supplemental Report A Study of Low-Level Lighting - Test Pile Driving and Loading Program - Study of Illumination - Port Facilities Interface Study - (Article) Civil Engineering - Daniel Webster Hoan Memorial Bridge LAKE INTERCHANGE 2 3 - Master Plans - High Mast Lighting System ISLAND INTERCHANGE 2 4 - Iron Street to Harbor Bridge - Station 25+00 to Station 108+85 Supplemental JUNEAU INTERCHANGE 2 5 - Master Plan - Roadway Soils Report - Alternative Retaining Walls Treatments - Study of Lighting Systems LAKE AND PARK FREEWAY 2 6 - Study Plans October 1965 - Preliminary Plans April 1966 - Preliminary Plans Traffic Analysis - Federal Highway Administration Draft Environmental/Section 4 (f) Statement - Alternative Preliminary Plans and Environmental Impact Statement - Historical Site Eligibility Study - Public Hearing, April 1976 PARK FREEWAY AND NORTH BELT 2 7 - North Ave and North Belt Location Report June 1958 - North Belt Expressway 4th-6th Streets Interchange Preliminary Design Report - Specifications and Contract Documents For Subsurface Exploration & Soil Testing - 12th St to 51st St Study Plans - 12th St to Sherman Blvd Preliminary Plans September 1966 - 12th St to Sherman Blvd Preliminary Plans July 1967 PARK FREEWAY AND NORTH BELT (contd.) 3 1 - 12th St to Sherman Blvd Roadway Soil Survey Report - WI Dept of Transportation Draft Environmental Statement Administrative Action - 4th St to Prospect Ave - Jackson to Prospect Revised Master Plan - Report of Preliminary Subsurface Exploration and Soil Testing, 1965 MARQUETTE INTERCHANGE 3 2 - Central Interchanges and Approaches Preliminary Design Report June 1957 - Milwaukee's Downtown Freeway Loop - A Study of Land Use and Planting Concepts - Dedication STADIUM FREEWAY 3 3 - Study Plan Report October 1966 - UW Dept Landscape Architecture-Environment Awareness Center - Soil Borings and Soil Properties Greendale Interchange to Stadium Interchange - Special Report Establishing a Route Location between Dean Road and County Line Road - Study 1970 - Bikeway Study For Stadium Freeway and Electric Co Lands - Location Study Report, 1971 - Review of 35th St Route - Summary Report Economic Impact of Proposed Stadium Freeway Northerly Extension on Milwaukee County - Federal Highway Administration Draft Environmental/Section 4(f) Statement Administrative Action - Federal Highway Administration Final Environmental/Section 4(f) Statement Administrative Action - South Demapping Study - Federal Highway Administration Draft Environmental Impact Statement, 1971 - Economic Impact of Proposed Stadium Freeway Northerly Extension on Milwaukee County Wisconsin, 1971 NOTE: Boxes 4 – 4D Located at GV, Sh. 052 BAY AND STADIUM FREEWAY 4 1 - Route Location Study - SEWRPC Areawide Planning Considerations Involved in the Location of the Proposed Stadium and Bay Freeways - MCEC Route Location Study Interim Report July 1969 - Bay Freeway Mill Rd Corridor Route Location Study Status Report January 1971 ARTERIES 4 2 - W. Mill Rd RR Grade Separation Analysis, Quantities & Cost Estimates - Arterial Street Maps 1963 - Federal Highway Administration Draft Environmental Impact Statement East Locust St. - North-South Expressway South Sixth Street Route. November 1956 MISCELLANEOUS 4 3 - Miscellaneous folder - Interstate Connection to Port of Milwaukee 1963 - Belt Freeway Location Report December 1969 - Preliminary Notes Multiple Use Corridor Study East-West Freeway - MCEC Downtown Expressways Supplementary Report, 1959 - MCEC Design Criteria for Milwaukee County Freeways, 1956 - MCEC Design Criteria for Milwaukee County Freeways, 1958 - MCEC Design Criteria for Milwaukee County Freeways, 1969 - City Plan Commission Milwaukee Wisconsin Master Plan, 1970-1990 - Department of City Development and Department of Public Works, City of Milwaukee Planning Guide for the Urban Highway and Street System, ca. 1960 - Operating System Map – fall, 1963 - Papers: Wisconsin Highway Conference 1964-1978 (not inclusive) - New Directions in Transportation Planning for the Milwaukee Area, 1977 - Silver Spring Extension-MC1624 1958. Request for information - Request for bus service-City of Glendale 1953 - Staff Memorandum: Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission- Area Wide Planning Considerations Involved in the Location of the Proposed Stadium and Bay Freeways. April, 1969 - Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission: Land Use Transportation Study- Forecast and Alternative Plans 1990, Volume Two. June 1966 - “Your Introduction to the Milwaukee County Expressway System” Road Record Book File 8-C-7 4 4 Binder: Expressway Project Directory 4 Loose TRANSPORTATION DIVISION (FINANCIAL MATERIAL) 4A Project #1 - East-West X-way 4A 1 - #0101 801-1 Bills Paid - #0102 (Right of Way) - #0103 UI5725 (4) - #0104 Bills Paid - #0105 Bills Paid - #0108 Project T-5725 (4) 801(8) - 801(6) Proj. IN94-4(4)307
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rebuilding the Marquette Interchange Is Not Among Them
    Wisconsin Policy Research Institute R e p o r t December 2002 Volume 15, Number 9 Rebuilding the M a rq u e t t e I n t e rchange via a P u b l i c - P r i v a t e P a rt n e r s h i p REPORT FROM THE PRESIDENT: Over the next several years, there may be no more impor- WISCONSIN POLICY tant issue in Wisconsin than the rebuilding of the Marquette RESEARCH INSTITUTE, INC. Interchange. We asked several people with expertise to develop a study that identifies financing for the Marquette that would P.O. Box 487 • Thiensville, WI 53092 not use public funding but would introduce the concept of pri- (262) 241-0514 • Fax: (262) 241-0774 vate money. The lead author is Robert Poole, Jr., the founder of E-mail: [email protected] • Internet: www.wpri.org the Reason Foundation and its director of transportation studies. His 1988 study on private toll roads in California changed national thinking in several states on the use of private and pub- REBUILDING THE lic toll roads. He has advised numerous states as well as the last four White House administrations on various transportation pol- MARQUETTE INTERCHANGE icy issues. Kevin Soucie is a Wisconsin-based consultant on transportation. He is a former Democratic member of the VIA A PUBLIC-PRIVATE Assembly and has chaired its transportation committee. Dr. Thomas McDaniel and Dr. Daryl Fleming have many years of PARTNERSHIP combined experience in transportation issues and have provid- ed important research for this project.
    [Show full text]
  • US 41 Interstate Conversion Study, Executive Summary
    Executive Summary Description of the Proposed Action The Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT), in consultation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), is studying alternatives to convert United States Highway 41 (US 41) from a non-Interstate freeway on the National Highway System (NHS) to an Interstate Highway between the Zoo Interchange on Interstate 94 (I-94/I-894) in Milwaukee and the US 41/I-43 interchange in Green Bay. The overall study corridor extends through Kenosha, Racine, Milwaukee, Waukesha, Washington, Dodge, Fond du Lac, Winnebago, Outagamie, and Brown counties. See project location map on previous page. As a result, WisDOT and FHWA have limited the proposed action in this environmental document to the following: x Consider the broad costs and benefits of Interstate conversion. x Evaluate the impacts of signing US 41 between Milwaukee and Green Bay with an Interstate route number and changing the designation of other segments of the study corridor. x Determine the construction impacts of installing Interstate signing and other minor improvements along the study corridor. Based on the results of the evaluation, WisDOT will determine whether to convert US 41 to an Interstate Highway. Purpose of and Need for the Project The purpose of the proposed action is to enhance and accelerate economic development by converting the US 41 corridor to an Interstate Highway and signing it thus. The need for the proposed action is based in part on economics and in part on meeting the intent of the previous federal surface transportation law which identified the US 41 corridor a high priority corridor on the NHS and designated it a future Interstate route.
    [Show full text]
  • Automation in Highway Construction Part I: Implementation Challenges at State Transportation Departments and Success Stories
    Automation in Highway Construction Part I: Implementation Challenges at State Transportation Departments and Success Stories PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-HRT-16-030 OCTOBER 2018 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 FOREWORD The Federal Highway Administration conducted research to document gaps for implementing automation in highway construction and to develop guidance for State transportation departments to assist them in implementing and using automation to improve project delivery. There are two volumes of the final report. Part I (this volume) presents a description of the key automation technology areas and the associated benefits, challenges, and solutions. Part II presents an overview of enabling technologies and policies for automation in highway construction as well as implementation strategies, design procedures, and practical guidelines to properly generate three-dimensional (3D) models for uses in construction and other phases of highway project delivery. This volume provides State transportation departments a focus on five key technology areas, taking into consideration that, to be able to fully implement automation during the construction phase of a highway project, technologies are implemented prior to construction during the planning, surveying, and design phases. The key technology areas are remote sensing, underground utilities locating technologies, 3D design, machine control and automation, and field technology and inspection. This volume documents success stories and best practices for automation in highway construction; best uses for individual technologies, including the types of costs and resources required by the industry and agencies for implementing these technologies; and their associated return on investment. Finally, it documents challenges of automation technology in the areas of surveying, utilities, real-time verification, and data management.
    [Show full text]
  • Title: Milwaukee County Expressway Commission Reference Code: Mss
    Title: Milwaukee County Expressway Commission Reference Code: Mss-2002 Inclusive Dates: 1946-1980 Bulk: 70.9 cu. ft. total Location: WHW, Sh. CL160A-CL171 (52.5 cu. ft.) GV, Sh. 52 (7.8 cu. ft.) LM, Sh. 188-189 (4.9 cu. ft.) HH, Sh. 023-024 (3.4 cu. ft.) MV, F9 and F35 (1.0 cu. ft.) LS, Sh. 077 (1.3 cu. ft.) OS SM “M” (1 item) Abstract: The Milwaukee County Department of Public Works provided staff and services for the Milwaukee County Expressway Commission during its 26 years of existence (1953-1980). Scope and Content: The collection consists of preliminary plans, progress reports, various traffic surveys and studies for the Milwaukee metropolitan area, as well as studies, surveys, and reports specific to sections of the county freeway system, including Lake, Park, Stadium, Bay, and Belt Freeways and their interchanges, extensions, and bridges. Part I of this finding aid consists of plans, progress reports, surveys, and studies prepared for or about the Metropolitan Milwaukee area freeway system. There are also photos and slides taken during the freeway construction. Part II contains an incomplete collection of appraisal report files received from the Milwaukee County Expressway Commission during 1978 and 1979. Part III deals with unprocessed project numbered boxes received from the Milwaukee County Department of Public Works. Notes: Collection added to by Steve Daily, May 2, 1996, and updated by Kevin Abing, June 9, 1999 & August 13, 2002 Arrangement: Folder Heading Box # Divider # NOTE: Boxes 1 – 4 located at LM, Sh. 188-189 PRELIMINARY
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Freeway Simulation Models to Urban Corridors, Volume I
    Publication No. FHWA-RD-92-103 Application of Freeway Simulation Models to Urban Corridors Volume I: Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike, McLean , Va 22101-2296 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-RD-92-103 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date APPLICATION OF FREEWAY SIMULATION MODELS TO URBAN CORRIDORS. Volume I: Final Report 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Steven Smith, Dr. Richard Worrall, David Roden, Ronald A. Pfefer, Michael Hankey 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) JHK & Associates 11. Contract or Grant No. 1650 Iowa Avenue Suite 100 DTFH61-88-C-00059 Riverside, CA 92507 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of Safety and Traffic Operations R & D Final Report Federal Highway Administration September 1988 - November 1992 6300 Georgetown Pike 14. Sponsoring Agency Code McLean, VA 22101-2296 15. Supplementary Notes Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) - Dr. Stephen L. Cohen, HSR-10. The Traffic Institute, Northwestern University served as subcontractor to JHK & Associates 16. Abstract Freeway simulation is gaining increasing acceptance and popularity as a toll for evaluating freeway improvement alternatives and refining freeway designs. The evaluation of individual sections one at a time is frequently inadequate to fully consider the implications of traffic flow on freeway design and operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Affidavit of Eric O'keefe in Support of the Motion of Tiie Club for Growtii and Its Directors to Quash Subpoenas
    STATE OF WISCONSIN BEFORE THE JOHN DOE JUDGE COLUMBIA COUNTY CASE NO. 13JD00011 DANE COUNTY CASE NO. 13JD000009 IN THE MATTER OF A JOHN DODGE COUNTY CASE NO. 13JD000006 DOE PROCEEDING IOWA COUNTY CASE NO. 13JD000001 MILWAUKEE COUNTY CASE NO. 13JD000023 AFFIDAVIT OF ERIC O'KEEFE IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTION OF TIIE CLUB FOR GROWTII AND ITS DIRECTORS TO QUASH SUBPOENAS ERIC O'KEEFE, of lawful age, being duly sworn under oath, hereby deposes and states: 1. I am one of three Directors of the Wisconsin Club for Growth, Inc. (the "Club"), a corporation organized under the laws of Wisconsin and recognized as tax-exempt under Section 501(c)(4) of the Internal Revenue Code. 2. The Club has two other directors, Charles Talbot and Eleanore Hawley. 3. I have personal knowledge of the Club's activities bet\veen 2009 and the date of this affidavit. Alnong other things, I have personal kno\vledge of the individuals and entities who have supported the Club's mission and have donated their time and resources to the Club. I also have personal knowledge of the decisions the Club has n1ade to spend or donate its money and time in Wisconsin or in other states between 2009 and the date of this affidavit. 1 believe that n1y personal knowledge, or the information and belief I have gained through investigation, is coextensive with the knowledge and information of the Club relative to the topics addressed in this affidavit 4. Many individuals and entities have donated money to the Club since 2009. These supporters have told me that they donate because they agree with the Club's beliefs regarding society and our democracy, and they kno\v that the Club will use its resources wisely to promote our shared vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity
    Report Title Report Date: 2009 Freeway Work Zone Lane Capacity Principle Investigator Vendor Name and Address Name Drakopoulos, Alex «Vendor» Affiliation Marquette University Address 263 Haggerty Hall P.O. Box 1881 Milwaukee, WS 53201-1881 Phone (414) 288-5430 Fax (414) 288-7521 Email [email protected] Author(s) and Affiliation(s) Thomas Notbohm, P.E., Wisconsin Department of Transportation Alex Drakopoulos, Marquette University Amjad Dehman, Marquette University Supplemental Funding Agency Name and Address (if applicable) Supplemental Notes Abstract The focus of this report is a capacity analysis of two long-term urban freeway Work Zones. Work Zone #1 tapered four mainline lanes to two, using two separate tapers; Work Zone #2 tapered two mainline lanes to one. Work Zone throughput was analyzed throughout the day over multiple days and traffic operations conditions were analyzed up to a distance of five miles upstream of the Work Zone entrance. Historical data from pavement-embedded detectors were used to analyze traffic conditions. The database consisted of five-minute volume, speed and occupancy data collected from 78 detectors for a total of 50 days. Congestion during each analyzed Work Zone existed for more than fourteen hours each day; Work Zone impacts adversely affected freeway operations over distances of 3.7 to 4.2 miles. Speed and occupancy conditions further upstream were, however, not affected, or even improved due to significant trip diversion. Work Zone capacity was defined based on the maximum traffic flows observed over a one-hour period; throughput values were also compiled over longer periods of time when traffic was within 90% of the maximum observed one-hour flows, as well as over the multi-hour mid-day period.
    [Show full text]
  • Milwaukee County
    CONNECTIONS 2030 LONG-RANGE MULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION PLAN Southeastern Wisconsin Metropolitan Planning Area: Milwaukee County Planning Area Overview The Southeast Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission is the designated policy body responsible for continuing, cooperative and comprehensive urban transportation planning and decision making for southeastern Wisconsin. The Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission Planning Area consists of the urban and urbanized areas of Whitewater, Elkhorn, Delavan, Lake Geneva, Round Lake Beach, Burlington, Kenosha, Union Grove, Racine, Milwaukee, Mukwonago, Richfield, Hartford, West Bend and Port Washington. Five multimodal corridors cross Milwaukee County: Capitol, Glacial Plains, Hiawatha, Fox Valley and Titletown. The Capitol Corridor extends from Madison to the Milwaukee area. The Glacial Plains corridor runs from the Rock County area to the Milwaukee area. The Hiawatha Corridor falls entirely within Milwaukee, Kenosha, Racine and Waukesha counties and is defined by endpoints in Milwaukee and Illinois. In addition, both the Fox Valley Corridor (US 41) and the Titletown Corridor (I-43, WIS 172) are defined by endpoints in Green Bay and Milwaukee. Refer to the appropriate maps and tables for more information. Current Planning Area Characteristics Future Planning Area Vision • Airports: • Airports: Continued service, increased direct air service and more business airplane- ǻ Air carrier (passenger) airport: General Mitchell International (Milwaukee) capable airports ǻ General utility airport:
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 732 Southeast Wisconsin Freeway
    Legislative Fiscal Bureau One East Main, Suite 301 • Madison, WI 53703 • (608) 266-3847 • Fax: (608) 267-6873 Email: [email protected] • Website: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/lfb May, 2019 Joint Committee on Finance Paper #732 Southeast Wisconsin Freeway Megaprojects (Transportation -- State Highway Program) [LFB 2019-21 Budget Summary: Page 425, #4] CURRENT LAW With the enactment of 2011 Act 32, the 2011-13 budget act, the southeast Wisconsin freeway rehabilitation program was replaced with the southeast Wisconsin freeway megaprojects program. A southeast Wisconsin freeway megaproject is defined as an improvement project with an estimated cost exceeding $609.5 million in 2018 dollars. Southeast Wisconsin freeways are statutorily defined as being located in Kenosha, Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Racine, Walworth, Washington, or Waukesha counties. Any rehabilitation or capacity expansion project on those freeways with a cost below that threshold is the responsibility of the state highway rehabilitation or major highway development programs, as applicable. Prior to the start of construction, southeast Wisconsin freeway megaprojects must be enumerated in the statutes. Presently, the I-94 North- South freeway and the Zoo Interchange projects are the only enumerated megaprojects. A total of $535.6 million was provided for southeast Wisconsin freeway megaprojects in the 2017-19 biennium. This amount was comprised of $18.1 million in state funds, $252.4 million in general fund-supported, general obligation bonds, and $265.1 million of federal funds. Of the total amount, $487.4 million was allocated for the I-94 North-South freeway project, while the remaining $48.2 million was allocated to the core of the Zoo Interchange project.
    [Show full text]
  • US 41 Interchange Conversion Study, Environmental Evaluation Of
    Project Location North Project I.D. 1113-00-00 Terminus US 41 Interstate Conversion Study US 41/I-43 Interchange KEWKEWAUNEEAUNEE OUTOUTAGAMIEAGAMIE Green Bay 172 BROWNBROWN 41 North 43 LEGEND 10 441 Proposed Interstate conversion Appleton and newly designated I-41 route MANITOWOC Proposed I-41 signing added CALUMETCALUMET to existing Interstate (Designated I-41) Lake US 41 Not included in the Oshkosh Winnebago 151 designated interstate route WINNEBAGO Fond du Lac FOND DU LAC 41 To Green Bay 41 45 SHEBOYGAN 43 175 45 US 41/US 45/WIS 175 To be redesignated Interchange WIS 175 41 OZAUKEEOZAUKEE 45 DODGEDODGE 41 175 43 45 41 US 41 designation WWAASHINGTONSHINGTON to be removed removed Brookfield StadiumStadiumStadium Marquette MarquetteMarquette ZooZooZoo InterchangeInterchangeInterchange InterchangeInterchangeInterchange InterchangeInterchangeInterchange 94 94 Milwaukee Waukesha 94 Milwaukee JEFFERSONJEFFERSON 41 West Allis 94 US 41 designation to be removed WWAAUKESHAUKESHA 43 MILMILWWAUKEEAUKEE 894 43 41 Greenfield New Berlin MitchellMitchellMitchell HaleHaleHale 41 43 894 41 InterchangeInterchangeInterchangeWWAALLWORTHWORTH RACINE Racine InterchangeInterchangeInterchange 94 43 41 Greendale 41 Kenosha 45 94 KENOSHAKENOSHA Wisconsin/Illinois Franklin State Line US 41/I-94 Interchange MCHENRY LAKE South Terminus TBG040412112746MKE 0-0_US41_Project_Location_Map_ID_v7 07.24.13 sls ENVIRONMENTAL ADDENDUM A Wisconsin Department of Transportation Alternative (Selected) Interstate Designation. This alternative would designate US 41 Total Length of Center Line of as I-41 between the Zoo Interchange in Milwaukee and the US 41/I-43 interchange in Existing Roadway: 175 miles Green Bay. Between the US 41/I-94 Interchange (the south terminus) and the Zoo Length of This Alternative: 175 miles Interchange, I-41 would be signed concurrent with the existing Interstate system.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Freight NEEDS– WISCONSIN
    GREATEST The Case for Freight NEEDS– WISCONSIN Increasing capacity on “The benefits of a highway expansion project along Interstate our nation’s 39/90 are enormous. An improved corridor would support transportation economic growth and development in the county, the region, system will: and the entire state.” • Unlock Gridlock, —Frank Busalacchi, Wisconsin Department of Transportation Secretary • Generate Jobs, • Deliver Freight, • Access Energy, Freight Capacity Needs Interstate 39/90 Corridor • Connect Communities Interstates 94/894 & U.S. 45 Zoo Interchange Interstate 94 North/South Corridor Did you know? U.S. 41 • The amount of freight moved in this coun- Interstate 39/90 Corridor try—from milk, tooth- The Interstate 39/90 Corridor from the Illinois/Wisconsin border north to the U.S. 12/18 paste and toilet paper interchange near Madison stretches for about 45 miles. The corridor links the urban cen- to sparkplugs, wheat ters of Beloit, Janesville, and Madison plus the many small, rural communities between and wind turbines—is them. It serves daily commuter traffic and the region’s agricultural interests, including expected to double in hundreds of individual farming operations. The busy corridor also provides an entry the next 40 years? point into the state and to locations in Minnesota, northern Michigan, and Canada. It is a key route for moving freight and handling the steady flow of tourism traffic bound for • The Interstate High- destinations throughout Wisconsin and beyond. way System repre- sents only 4 percent of total miles but carries 70 percent of commer- cial truck traffic? • Each of the top ten worst freight-truck bottlenecks cause over one million hours of delay a year? The Interstate 39/90 corridor from the Wisconsin state line to the US Highway 12/18 inter- change near the city of Madison stretches for approximately 45 miles For more information: http://expandingcapacity.transportation.org/ GREATEST The Case for Freight NEEDS– WISCONSIN Capacity Needs continued An environmental study was recently completed.
    [Show full text]
  • I-94 Eas/West Record of Decision
    I-94 East-West Corridor 70th Street to 16th Street Milwaukee County, Wisconsin Wisconsin DOT Project I.D. 1060-27-00 Record of Decision September 2016 Contents Decision ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Corrections ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 New Information Following Final EIS Publication ................................................................................................ 5 Alternatives Considered ..................................................................................................................................... 7 No-Build Alternative ....................................................................................................................................... 7 Transportation System Management Alternative .......................................................................................... 7 Region-wide Public Transit and Transportation Demand Management Alternative ..................................... 8 Build Alternatives ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Replace-in-Kind Alternative ............................................................................................................... 8 Spot Improvement Alternatives .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]