DOCSLIB.ORG

Minutes of a Special Meeting of the San Francisco

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND THE SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSION HELD ON THE 3RD DAY JUNE OF 2010 The Commissioners of the Redevelopment Agency of the City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco Planning Commission met in a Special meeting at City Hall, 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Board of Supervisors Chamber, Room 250, in the City of San Francisco, California, at 1:00 p.m. on the 3rd day of June 2010, at the place and date duly established for holding of such a meeting. Planning Commission President Ron Miguel called the meeting to order at 1:00 p.m. President Miguel stated the following: "Because there hasn't been a combined meeting of our two bodies, Planning and Redevelopment, for some time, I thought perhaps a brief intro was in order. The Planning Commission participates in joint commission hearings when a major land-use project before us will also take action by another of our City's commissions, as we have done recently with the Recreation and Park Division and with the Health Commission. This joint interface avoids duplicative presentations by both staffs and duplicative testimony from the public, saving all of us a great deal of time, effort, and money. In addition, and at least of equal importance, joint hearings such as this enable a discussion among members of both the Agency and the Commission that would otherwise be legally impossible. Joint Planning and Redevelopment hearings in the recent past have included Yerba Buena, Mission Bay, and South Beach. Each of these development areas has proven itself to be eminently successful and each of them continues to provide viable additions of infrastructure, housing, commerce, and recreation for the benefits of San Franciscans. Today's project areas are equally massive. They encompass over 700 acres in land. They envision not only a similar expansion and intensification of San Francisco's built environment, again infrastructure, housing, commerce, and recreation, but mandate a distinct emphasis on viable connections with our city's streets and transportation grids, an emphasis which is absolutely integral to the sustained viability of the Candlestick Point and Hunters Point communities. I'm not going to recite all the statistics. The staff will present those details as we move along in this hearing today. And as most of you today know, they have been well-emphasized in over ten hours of hearings recently, informational hearings at the Planning Commission, and I'm certain that President Swig has presided over a similar number of hours during Redevelopment Agency hearings. This has been an intentional public process to complement the many, many years of both formal and informal neighborhood and city wide outreach. Today I will chair the first part of the hearing, the certification of the EIR; President Swig will preside over the latter section, which starts after 5:00 p.m. We all look forward to hearing from the staff and the communities which are directly involved, and from the general public." Minutes of a Special Meeting, June 3, 2010 1. RECOGNITION OF A QUORUM The Planning Commission Secretary Avery announced the presence of a quorum with the following Commissioners present: Ron Miguel, President Christine Olague William L. Lee Gwyneth Borden Michael J. Antonini Kathrin Moore Hisashi Sugaya John Rahaim, Director, and staff members were also present. The Redevelopment Commission Secretary Solis announced the presence of a quorum with the following Commissioners present: Rick Swig, President Darshan Singh, Vice President London Breed Miguel M. Bustos Francee Covington Leroy King Fred Blackwell, Executive Director, and staff members were also present. 2. Matters of New Business: PLANNING COMMISSION: Item No. 1: Consideration of the Motion Adopting Findings Related to the Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for a Proposed Candlestick Point-Hunters Point Shipyard Phase II Development Plan REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: Agency Action 2a: Consideration of a Resolution Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Candlestick Point-Hunters Point Shipyard Phase II Development Plan Project Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; Bayview Hunters Point and Hunters Point Shipyard Redevelopment Project Areas, Resolution No. 58-2010 Presenters: Lisa Gibson, Planning Department, and Stanley Muraoka, Redevelopment Agency Page 2 of 175 Minutes of a Special Meeting, June 3, 2010 (TRANSCRIPT OF PRESENTATION/DISCUSSION/COMMENTS OF SPECIAL HEARING ON ALL ITEMS ATTACHED) SPEAKERS: Francisco DaCosta, Maria Harrison, Vivian Donahue, Esselene Stancil, Alex Tom, Ya Yan, Emily Lee, Li Shuang Li, Daniel Landry, Drew Christopher Joy, Alicia Garza, Jose Luis Pavon, Daniel Solberg, Arthur Feinstein, Saul Bloom, Espanola Jackson, Rodger Scott, Michael Patton, Aurelius Walker, Carmen Policy, Matt Regan, Javier Ramirez, Eileen Hines, Celestine Howard, Jill Fox, Roange Kent, Tera Gray, Conny Ford, Stormy Henry, Thomas Tang, Richard Lau, Terry Anders, Javier Marquez, Gary Banks, Anthony Russo, Claire Bishop, Tiffany Carpenter, Dr. Ahimsa Porter Sumchai, Bradley Bradley, James Mabrey, Amos Brown, Kristina Enea, Linda Richardson, Ann Huey, Ebony Manning, Janita Towns, Fred Noronho, Karina Bas, Gladys Soto, Dedrea Smith, Ace Washington, Charles Hayes, Reginald Rainer, Shantanese Gaines, Lakia Evans, Latasha Beasley, Tashara Johnson, Ashley Anderson, Tammy Ingle, Dennis Lamsey, Tony Rodriguez, Michael Theriault, Tim Paulson, Alonzo Menelik Abdul Raheem Walker, Russ Sturgis, Jarell, Gary Lynch, Tim Colen, Tony Kelly, Ron Stutts, Ricardo Contreras, Linda Shaffer, Marcia Dale Winter, Leon Muhammad, Dr. Veronica Hunnicutt, Renee Saucedo PLANNING COMMISSION: Item No. 1: Consideration of the Motion Adopting Findings Related to the Certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report for a Proposed Candlestick Point-Hunters Point Shipyard Phase II Development Plan Commissioner Lee put forth a motion to move Planning Commission Item No. 1. Commissioner Antonini seconded the motion. Planning Commission Secretary Avery called the roll: Commissioner Antonini: Aye Commissioner Borden: Aye Commissioner Lee: Aye Commissioner Moore: No Commissioner Sugaya: No Commissioner Olague: No President Miguel: Aye Ms. Avery stated the motion passes 4 to 3, with Commissioners Moore, Sugaya, and Olague voting against. Page 3 of 175 Minutes of a Special Meeting, June 3, 2010 REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: Agency Action 2a. Adoption of the Redevelopment Commission Agency Action 2a: Consideration of a Resolution Certifying the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Proposed Candlestick Point-Hunters Point Shipyard Phase II Development Plan Project Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act; Bayview Hunters Point and Hunters Point Shipyard Redevelopment Project Areas, Resolution No. 58-2010 Vice President Singh put forth a motion to move Redevelopment Commission Agency Action 2a. Commissioner Covington seconded the motion. Commission Secretary Solis called the roll: Commissioner Breed: Aye Commissioner Covington: Aye Commissioner King: Aye Commissioner Bustos: Aye Commissioner Singh: Aye President Swig: Aye Ms. Solis stated the motion passes unanimously. PRESIDENT MIGUEL CALLED A RECESS AT THIS TIME - 9:21 P.M. THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE TO BE CONSIDERED NO EARLIER THAN 5:00 P.M. IN THE CONTEXT OF TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS, BOTH OF WHICH WERE CALLED AT THIS POINT IN THE PROCEEDINGS AND CONDUCTED CONCURRENTLY. President Swig called the meeting to order at 9:32 P.M. and stated the following: "Good evening. It's now 9:32, where it was supposed to be 5:00 o'clock in the afternoon. And I'd like to get started again and remind you that this is the special joint hearing of the San Francisco Redevelopment Agency and the San Francisco Planning Commission. Welcome again to the public and radio and TV listening audiences. For those who are ~ didn't get the announcement at 1:00 o'clock this afternoon, please turn off all pagers, cell phones and other sound emitting devices during the meeting. If you wish to speak, please fill out a speaker card for the item which is called and the item on which you address either of the commissions. Please state your name ~ very important — state your name for the record before you make your statements and please limit your remarks to three minutes. And this portion of the agenda is not intended for debate or discussion with Commissioners or staff. Please simply state your business you wish the Commission or staff to be aware of. If you have any questions you can follow up with staff or Commissioners during the break or after adjournment, There will be a Page 4 of 175 Minutes of a Special Meeting, June 3, 2010 break absolutely at 11:30 p.m., as many of us have cars in the Civic Center parking garage and we wish not to have housed for the evening. It is not appropriate for Commissioners to engage in debate or respond on issues not properly set in a publicly notified meeting agenda. And, for press and the public, please stay within the designated seating area. You have the speaker podium. And members of press are requested to film or record the Commission meeting from the side area of the designated public seating area to my right and your left. And the filming or recording equipment should not interfere with the public's view of participation in the meeting as well as presentation materials before the Commission. These guidelines are in the spirit of promoting open and orderly public meetings. And your continued interest in the Agency, the Commission, and the Planning Commission meetings is welcomed and greatly appreciated. Before I ask Madam Secretary to call the first item, I'd like to let you know what's going to occur so it catches nobody by surprise. First of all, we will have the reading of the Planning items. Then we will have the reading of the Redevelopment items, as they are separate from each other. Those are Items 2 through 9.
Recommended publications
  • Copyrighted Material

    Copyrighted Material

    11_571869 bindex.qxd 10/21/04 7:11 PM Page 172 Index See also Accommodations and Restaurant indexes below. GENERAL INDEX Architectural highlights, 130–131 Area codes, 28 Art Festival, Union Street, 5 A AA (American Automobile Art galleries, 141 Association), 12 Asian Art Museum, 113–114 Aardvark’s, 150–151 ATMs (automated teller machines), 1 AARP, 9 Avenue Cyclery, 133 Ab Fits, 146 Avis, 26 Accommodations, 33–65. See also Accommodations Index The Castro, 63–64 Cow Hollow, 60–62 B aker Beach, 128, 132–133 family-friendly, 54–55 Bambuddha Lounge, 162–163 The Financial District, 57–58 Barnes & Noble, 141 Fisherman’s Wharf, 58–60 Bars, 163–169 with free parking, 49 BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit), 10, 25 Japantown, 62–63 Baseball, 137 The Marina, 60–62 Basketball, 137 Nob Hill, 46–50 Bay Area Reporter, 9, 169 North Beach, 58–60 Bay Area Theatresports (BATS), Pacific Heights, 60–62 157–158 pricing categories, 34 Bay Guardian, 16 near San Francisco International Bayporter Express, 11 Airport, 64–65 Bay to Breakers Foot Race, SoMa, 50–57 4, 135–136 Union Square, 35–46 Beach Blanket Babylon, 158 A.C.T. (American Conservatory Beaches, 132 Theater), 156 Be-At Line, 159 Addresses, finding, 17 Belden Place cafes, 73 Alabaster, 148 Biking, 133 A La Carte, A La Park, 6 Biordi Art Imports, 148 Alamo car-rental agency, 26 Birkenstock, 150 Alamo Square Historic District, 130 The Bliss Bar, 163 Alcatraz Island, 105, 108 Blue & Gold Fleet, 28, 108, 131–132 American Automobile Association Boating, 133–134 (AAA), 12 Boat tours, 131–132 American Conservatory
  • May 12, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell Majority Leader United

    May 12, 2020 the Honorable Mitch Mcconnell Majority Leader United

    May 12, 2020 The Honorable Mitch McConnell The Honorable Charles Schumer Majority Leader Minority Leader United States Senate United States Senate Washington, D.C. 20510 Washington, D.C. 20510 The Honorable Nancy Pelosi The Honorable Kevin McCarthy Speaker of the House House Minority Leader U.S. House of Representatives U.S. House of Representatives Washington, D.C. 20515 Washington, D.C. 20515 RE: Temporarily Expand SNAP in the Next Federal COVID-19 Relief Package to Lift Up Vulnerable Families and Support Local Economies Dear Speaker Pelosi and Leaders McConnell, Schumer, and McCarthy: We, the undersigned mayors representing cities across the nation, appreciate your work on the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) and Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act to help workers, employers, older Americans, and children, but much more needs to be done to ensure that our residents can weather this crisis. During this time of soaring unemployment, financial insecurity, and growing hunger, we urge Congress to temporarily increase SNAP benefit levels in the next federal COVID-19 relief package. America’s cities are on the front line of responding to unprecedented disruption to local economies triggered by COVID-19. As mayors, we need every option available to fight hunger and stimulate the economy in our cities. SNAP is a proven solution to both challenges. By providing families with a grocery benefit they can use to purchase food directly, SNAP is a safe, effective way to ensure that low-income children and their families can get the food they need during this unprecedented crisis. While the FFCRA provided USDA with authority to increase emergency SNAP allotments for existing SNAP households to the maximum benefit, the most vulnerable families—roughly 12 million people, including 5 million children—received no additional nutrition assistance because their household already received the maximum SNAP benefit.
  • Masonic1421 Avenue

    Masonic1421 Avenue

    Masonic1421 Avenue Important Details Ashbury Heights View Condo F One-Bedroom, One-Bathroom Condo in a Six-Unit Building F Elegant Ashbury Heights Location F Gorgeous Architectural Details Danielle Lazier: SFHotlist Team F Remodeled Kitchen and Bath [email protected] 415.528.7355 calBRE 01340326 F One-Car Parking • F Shared Laundry F Extra Storage We are San Francisco’s premier real estate team. F Easy Downtown and Cross-City Commutes via the 6-Haight, We have a track record of delivering superior results and 37-Corbett, 33-Ashbury, and 43 Masonic Bus Lines creating happy clients. Here’s what we can do for you. F Close to Parks, Restaurants, and Practical Amenities F Walk Score: 93 Top 1% in SF Property Sales. We offer dedicated client care, massive sales experience, and unparalleled F 1,033 Square Feet Per Tax Record access to the best listings and buyers. In 2015, we sold more than $100M F HOA Fee: $337 Per Month in real estate, putting us in the top 1% of all SF agents. We have the buyers you want. We regularly interact with dozens of buyers looking to own in San Francisco. Whether via email, in person, or on social media, we know how, when and where to find the right buyers for your home. You benefit from our relationships. Real estate is about relationships. If you are represented by a well-known Realtor Asking: $899,000 with a great reputation, you will get the inside scoop on a home and have a higher chance of having your offer accepted.
  • Conservancy Report

    Conservancy Report

    San Francisco Public Space Management Study Report May 2018 Project team BRIAN GUINEY / @FIVEALIVE55 Kearstin Krehbiel, Consultant Amy Cohen, Director, Neighborhood Program Development Robin Abad Ocubillo, Senior Planner Jeremy Shaw, Planner / Urban Designer Jack Tse, Urbanist May 14, 2018 | 2 kearstinkrehbiel.com/conservancy Table of Contents INTRODUCTION Why are public spaces important? What are the challenges? 1 What are the place-types? Who are the stakeholders? RESEARCH Project overview. Surveys and interviews. Demand for services. Case 2 Studies. Available public funds. Feedback from City stakeholders. MODEL Defining the model. Serving and creating stewards. Governance. 3 Equity. Benefits of the model. Core services. LAUNCH 4 Three launch scenarios: Continue Business Planning, Partially-funded, Fully-funded. Staffing and budget sketches. Which types of public-private partnerships can meet the management needs of San Francisco public open spaces? The character of San Francisco can be seen in its myriad public spaces and in the unique ways that we create, care for, and use these places. This report seeks to identify a need and propose a model and a plan to launch a public-private partnership that will elevate our public spaces and the communities that care for them. May 14, 2018 | 3 kearstinkrehbiel.com/conservancy Intro Why? What? Where? Who? GETTY IMAGES Why are public spaces so important? ROBERT COUSE-BAKER/FLICKR PUBLIC SPACES CONNECT US Parks, plazas, and sidewalks are where we meet, relax, play, and express civic values. Public spaces also serve as a critical asset to low-income families and people living in dense neighborhoods. Public spaces provide the opportunity for people to build community in an increasingly divided city, and well-managed public spaces help to build trust in government.
  • April 8, 2021 the Honorable Toni Atkins the Honorable Anthony

    April 8, 2021 the Honorable Toni Atkins the Honorable Anthony

    April 8, 2021 The Honorable Toni Atkins The Honorable Anthony Rendon Senate Pro Tempore Assembly Speaker State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 The Honorable Nancy Skinner The Honorable Phil Ting Chair, Senate Budget Committee Chair, Assembly Budget Committee State Capitol State Capitol Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento, CA 95814 Dear President Pro Tempore Atkins, Speaker Rendon and Budget Chairs Skinner and Ting, We appreciate your willingness to meet with us, and to continue your partnership with the mayors of our largest cities in finding pragmatic solutions to address our state’s homelessness crisis. Given the scale of the challenge we collectively face, and because of the extraordinary opportunity created by two unique circumstances--the passage of the American Rescue Plan and the state’s budget surplus--we write to revisit our prior budget request. As you know, we have long believed that the state must identify an ongoing, consistent allocation of flexible funding sufficient to meet the enormity of the challenge in our cities for affordable housing construction and supportive services. While our economic challenges make it difficult to identify an ongoing revenue source, the large amount of one-time funding presents a generational opportunity to make a dramatic move to address our homelessness crisis. That can be accomplished by setting aside a one-time allocation of $16 billion for a steady expenditure of $4 billion per year over the next four years. Through our partnership, we’ve accomplished much in our cities in recent years through such initiatives as Project Homekey, HHAP, and HEAP. We created permanent or transitional housing for our homeless at an average cost to the state of $148,000 per unit under Project Homekey, for instance, and we built prefabricated dorms, modular housing, tiny homes, and shelters even more cost-effectively with state and local dollars.
  • LWCF Projects 1964 to 2019

    LWCF Projects 1964 to 2019

    FiscalYear CountyName AgencyName ProjectNumber ProjectName ProjectScope GrantAmount ProjectAddress ProjectCity ProjectZipCod Latitude Longitude e 2018/19 Kern City of Bakersfield 06-01827 Kaiser Permanente Construct 4 new football fields, a restroom and concession $3,000,000 9001 Ashe Road Bakersfield 93313 NULL NULL Sports Village stand, exercise outdoor gym area, 3 parking lots, Project installation of sports field lighting, and landscaping at the Kaiser Permanente Sports Village in the City of Bakersfield. 2018/19 Humboldt City of Eureka 06-01826 Sequoia Park Construct new trails, playground facilities, off-street ADA $1,525,000 3414 W Street Eureka 95503 NULL NULL Redwood Canopy compliant parking and new restrooms and renovate trails Walk and Trail in Sequoia Park in the City of Eureka. Project 2018/19 Riverside City of Indio 06-0130 South Jackson Park Construct a new approximately 0.5 mile trail with exercise $652,500 83100 Date Indio 92201 NULL NULL Accessibility stations and plant approximately 50 new trees, renovate Avenue Improvements existing playgrounds and provide ADA improvements at South Jackson Park in the City of Indio. 2018/19 Los Angeles City of Long Beach 06-01828 Davenport Park Construct a new multi-use sports field, shaded outdoor $2,016,000 2910 East 55th Long Beach 90805 NULL NULL Phase II seating area, and install exercise equipment with signage Way in Davenport Park in the City of Long Beach. 2018/19 Madera County of Madera 06-01829 Courthouse Park Construct a new playground, exercise stations, and picnic $203,747 210 W. Yosemite Madera 93637 NULL NULL Project area at Courthouse Park in the City of Madera.
  • File No. 131042 Amended in Board 11/5/13 Resolution No

    File No. 131042 Amended in Board 11/5/13 Resolution No

    AMENDED IN BOARD 11/5/13 FILE NO. 131042 RESOLUTION NO. 391-13 1 [Park, Recreation, and Open Space Advisory Committee - Membership List] 2 3 Resolution approving and modifying the Recreation and Park Commission's list of 4 recommended organizations for membership in the Park, Recreation, and Open Space 5 Advisory Committee. 6 7 WHEREAS, San Francisco Park Code, Article 13, Section 13.01, established the Park, 8 Recreation and Open Space Advisory Committee. That Ordinance provides that the 9 Recreation and Park Commission shall prepare, and the Board of Supervisors shall approve 1O or modify, a list of organizations qualified to nominate individuals for Park, Recreation and 11 Open Space Advisory Committee membership; now, therefore, be it 12 RESOLVED, That the list of recommended organizations qualified to nominate 13 individuals for Park Recreation and Open Space Advisory Committee membership are: 14 California Native Plant Society- Verba Buena Chapter, Friends of Duboce Park, Friends of 15 Mountain Lake Park, Friends of Recreation and Parks, Golden Gate Audubon Society - San 16 Francisco Conservation Committee, People Organizing to Demand Environmental Rights, 17 Proposition E Implementation Committee, San Francisco Beautiful, Neighborhood Park 18 Council, Committee for Better Parks and Recreation in Chinatown, San Francisco Friends of 19 the Urban Forest, San Francisco Group of the Sierra Club, San Francisco League of 20 Conservation Voters, San Francisco League of Urban Gardeners, San Francisco Tomorrow, 21 Save the Redwoods League,
  • Monthly Capital Report October 2018

    Monthly Capital Report October 2018

    San Francisco Recreation and Parks Capital & Planning Division Monthly Report September 30, 2018 Toks Ajike Director of Planning and Capital Management Prepared by: Antonio Guerra, Capital Finance Manager The City and County of San Francisco launched the PeopleSoft financial and procurement system on July 3, 2017. This new financial system replaces the over 20-year old FAMIS system and completely changes the way the department processes and reports on financial transactions and procurement. As such, there have been some changes in the standard monthly capital report. This report contains the following: Active project balances and non-reconciled closed projects Unlike previous monthly reports, this report does not show FY 2018-19 actuals due to changes in the People Soft BI reporting syastem. The Department hopes to have this data in time for the November 2018 monthly report. Recreation and Parks Monthly Capital Report ‐ September 30, 2018 Project Description Budget Actuals Encumbered Balance PW Mansell St Strtscp 1,718,517.08 1,668,345.86 3,777.25 46,393.97 PW TGHill Rockslide Rsp 3,111.05 2,526.45 0.00 584.60 RP 11th & Natoma Acquistion 9,866,104.26 9,830,256.41 0.00 35,847.85 RP 11th Street And Natoma Park 210,000.00 9.30 9,620.00 200,370.70 RP 1268p‐marina Harbor Bioswal 780,177.00 56,377.81 0.00 723,799.19 RP 1290P‐Shoreview Park 3,932.00 53,183.82 0.00 ‐49,251.82 RP 1291P‐Ggp Senior Center 48,538.16 27,875.12 13,051.20 7,611.84 RP 17th & Folsom Park Acq 3,190.00 0.00 0.00 3,190.00 RP 17Th And Folsom 4,976,560.11 4,921,987.49 88,978.69
  • Opening Remarks

    Opening Remarks

    1:00pm – 1:15pm Opening Remarks Vanessa Hauc, Senior Correspondent, Noticias Telemundo and Master of Ceremonies London Breed, Mayor of San Francisco Anne Hidalgo, Mayor of Paris, C40 Chair and Board Member of the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy 1:15pm – 1:45pm U.S. Mayors Leading the Way Showcasing city leadership on climate action in the - challenging U.S. political landscape Moderated by Jamil Smith, Senior Writer at Rolling Stone Jackie Biskupski, Mayor of Salt Lake City Jenny Durkan, Mayor of Seattle Eric Garcetti, Mayor of Los Angeles Bill Peduto, Mayor of Pittsburgh 1:45pm – 2:00pm In Conversation: Our Collective Mission Importance of “radical collaboration” and partnering with a diverse set of actors to achieve a climate-safe future Moderated by Audrey Cooper, Editor-in-Chief of San Francisco Chronicle Christiana Figueres, Vice Chair of the Global Covenant of Mayors for Climate & Energy and Convenor of Mission 2020 Laurence Tubiana, CEO, European Climate Foundation 2:00pm – 2:15pm Spotlight on Walking & Cycling Creating greener and healthier communities by putting pedestrians and cyclists first Moderated by Debbie Raphael, Director of the San Francisco Department of the Environment Juan Espadas Cejas, Mayor of Sevilla Frank Jensen, Lord Mayor of Copenhagen 2:15pm – 2:35pm Where Equity Meets Sustainability A look at how mayors around the world are taking inclusive climate action Moderated by Gregor Robertson, Mayor of Vancouver Wong Kam-sing, Secretary of the Environment, Hong Kong Raymond Johansen, Governing Mayor
  • July 8, 2019 Governor Gavin Newsom Senate President Pro Tem Toni

    July 8, 2019 Governor Gavin Newsom Senate President Pro Tem Toni

    July 8, 2019 Governor Gavin Newsom Senate President Pro Tem Toni Atkins Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon RE: AB 1054 (Holden) – Wildfires – CONCERNS and Request for Amendments Dear Governor Newsom, President Pro Tem Atkins, and Speaker Rendon: As mayors of three of the state’s largest cities, we believe local governments can and should play a leading role in ensuring that our electricity is safe, reliable, affordable, and clean. We support your efforts to ensure that the victims of the recent devastating California wildfires are made whole and that the state government does everything it can to reduce the likelihood and severity of future wildfires. We respectfully express our significant concerns about the July 5 version of AB 1054 (Holden), which would expand the California Public Utilities Commission’s (CPUC’s) authority over local government decision-making when considering the acquisition of assets from an electrical corporation. This proposed expansion of CPUC authority is unnecessary to achieve the goals of the bill and would not meaningfully address the risk of future catastrophic wildfires. Additionally, this section of the bill would set a dangerous precedent by limiting local government autonomy over its own employee relationships established through locally-negotiated collective bargaining agreements. To our knowledge, this specific language was added to the bill on July 5, was not circulated to potentially impacted stakeholders, including in our cities, and had not been publicly discussed prior to being amended into the bill. AB 1054 would amend Public Utilities Code (PUC) Sections 854 and 854.2 to require a “voluntary or involuntary change in ownership of assets from an electrical or gas corporation to ownership by a public entity” to first secure authorization to do so from the CPUC.
  • Press Release *** Mayor London Breed Announces

    Press Release *** Mayor London Breed Announces

    OFFICE OF THE MAYOR LONDON N. BREED SAN FRANCISCO MAYOR FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Friday, March 5, 2021 Contact: Mayor’s Office of Communications, [email protected] *** PRESS RELEASE *** MAYOR LONDON BREED ANNOUNCES LAUNCH OF NEW ECONOMIC RECOVERY PROGRAM TO SUPPORT AND RETRAIN WORKERS $28 million program will expand workforce development, paid training, and job placement for adults and youth in San Francisco, and will include targeted resources to address the disproportionate Black unemployment rate with funding from the Dream Keeper Initiative San Francisco, CA — Mayor London N. Breed today announced a new economic recovery program for workforce development, paid training programs, and job placement and employment services for San Franciscans. The $28 million Building Back Stronger program includes funding from the City’s Dream Keeper Initiative, which Mayor Breed announced last week, and will expand services for workers and jobseekers, address long-standing economic inequities and disparities in unemployment, and bolster the City’s economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic. The City’s $28 million investment in workforce programs is the result of two years of planning, and a full year of public meetings and listening sessions organized by San Francisco’s Office of Economic and Workforce Development (OEWD). The programs funded by this investment will help adults, youth, and San Franciscans who experience barriers to employment. In putting together the Building Back Stronger program, OEWD incorporated recommendations from the City’s Economic Recovery Task Force to develop a coordinated, comprehensive workforce development strategy and provide culturally-competent, accessible job training and career connections for job seekers and those who have lost work due to the pandemic.
  • London Breed's Troll Patrol

    London Breed's Troll Patrol

    Start your summer here June events The Tablehopper says get ready for Merchant Roots p.14 June is festival time on Union Street, in North Beach, Lynette Majer has the perfect summer wine pairings p.15 at Stern Grove, at SF Jazz, Michael Snyder touts the can't-miss summer movies p.16 and in the local cinemas p.18 MARINATIMES.COM CELEBRATING OUR 34TH YEAR VOLUME 34 ISSUE 06 JUNE 2018 Reynolds Rap London Breed’s troll patrol Is the mayoral candidate the company she keeps? BY SUSAN DYER REYNOLDS ’ve lived in the haight-ashbury district for three decades, and watched as it went from Left to right: Charles Sheeler, Classic Landscape, 1931. IMAGE COURTESY OF THE FINE ARTS MUSEUMS OF SAN FRANCISCO grief-stricken hippies pouring into the streets upon Ithe death of Grateful Dead guitarist Jerry Garcia to her- oin being sold off the hoods of cars to felonious tran- sients beating people up for their iPhones. I was so frus- The Cult of the Machine: Precisionism trated by District 5 Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi’s lack of action that, in 2010, I penned an editorial for Northside San Francisco magazine titled, “The thugs who run and American Art at the de Young Haight Street.” In 2012, much to my dismay, Mirkarimi was elected sheriff, and Mayor Ed Lee appointed Chris- BY SHARON ANDERSON tion. Originating from Cubism and combined highly structured, geomet- tina Olague to fill the supervisor position; however, Futurism, primarily European paint- ric compositions with smooth surfac- Olague’s tenure was short-lived as a bright, tenacious he de young museum is ing movements, Precisionism mar- es.