Pius XII: an Age in Arms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pius XII: an Age in Arms Pius XII: An age in arms This is the sixth in a series looking at the Church’s 12 most recent popes and the marks they’ve made on the Church. The series appeared monthly throughout 2018. On Aug. 23, 1939, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union stunned the world by announcing they had entered into a nonaggression agreement. It was not to last long, but the pact set the stage for the start of World War II. In “Men at Arms,” the first volume of British Catholic novelist Evelyn Waugh’s masterful trilogy, Guy Crouchback, scion of an old Catholic family, muses on the gratifying implications of this agreement between the Nazi and Communist powers — each of which, up until then, had been the mortal enemy of the other (and soon would be again). “Now, splendidly, everything had become clear,” Waugh writes. “The enemy at last was plain in view, huge and hateful, all disguise cast off. It was the Modern Age in arms.” The Modern Age in arms — this was the crisis that, six months earlier, Pope Pius XII had been summoned to confront by the conclave of cardinals that chose him as the 259th successor of St. Peter. His years in the diplomatic service of the Holy See were superb preparation for the task. But, from another perspective, neither he nor anyone could have been truly prepared for the stupendous challenges that lay ahead. All things considered, he met them remarkably well. Diplomatic service Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Pacelli was born March 2, 1876, one of four children of a family of the “Black Nobility” made up of old Roman families loyal to the papacy. His grandfather was a government official under Pius IX and a founder of the Vatican newspaper, L’Osservatore Romano; his father dean of the Roman Rota; his brother, Francesco, a legal adviser to Pius XI who helped negotiate the Lateran Treaty of 1929 that set the terms of the rapprochement between the Holy See and the Italian state after decades of estrangement. Pius XII at a glance – Born Eugenio Maria Giuseppe Giovanni Pacelli on March 2, 1876 – Ordained a priest in 1899, a bishop in 1917 and made a cardinal in 1929 – Pope from March 2, 1939-Oct. 9, 1958 – Navigated the Church through the trials of World War II and the Holocaust – Infallibly defined the dogma of the Assumption of Mary in 1950 – Declared Venerable in 2009 Eugenio was ordained a priest in 1899. After doing pastoral work, he joined the staff of the Vatican Secretariat of State and worked with Cardinal Pietro Gasparri on the preparation of the first-ever Code of Canon Law, which went into effect in 1918. During these years, he represented the Holy See at numerous international events, including the coronation of Britain’s King George V in 1911. In 1914, Pope Benedict XV chose Cardinal Gasparri as his secretary of state. He in turn chose Father Pacelli to head the secretariat’s section on “extraordinary ecclesiastical affairs” — Vaticanese for the foreign office. During World War I, the priest directed programs for locating and assisting prisoners of war and distributing humanitarian aid. In 1917, Pope Benedict XV appointed him nuncio to Bavaria and named him an archbishop. With the formation of a short-lived Bavarian Soviet Republic, he several times faced armed Marxist revolutionaries in Munich. The pope named him nuncio to Germany in 1920, and in 1925 he moved to Berlin. Pacelli conducted secret talks with representatives of the Soviet Union in hopes of finding a modus vivendi for the Church in that now officially atheist country, but in the absence of progress Pius XI ordered the talks to end in 1927. Shortly after the onset of the global financial crisis in 1929, the pope recalled the nuncio to Rome, named him a cardinal, and, when Cardinal Gasparri retired, appointed him secretary of state. In that capacity, Cardinal Pacelli traveled widely. In 1936, he went to the U.S. on a trip organized by Auxiliary Bishop Francis Spellman of Boston (later, archbishop of New York and a cardinal), an old friend from their days together in the Secretariat of State. Among the stops in 1936, Cardinal Pacelli met with President Franklin D. Roosevelt at the Roosevelt family home in Hyde Park, New York. Thereafter, Roosevelt referred to him as “my old friend,” and in 1939, the president named former U.S. Steel executive Myron Taylor his personal representative to the Holy See. The White House and the Vatican communicated often during the war years. As secretary of state, Cardinal Pacelli negotiated concordats with a number of countries, including Germany. Adolph Hitler, having come to power in 1933, saw political advantage in reaching an early accord with the Church. Cardinal Pacelli had no illusions about the Nazis but hoped to obtain for the Church the protection of a formal agreement. Nazi violations of the concordat began almost at once. Between 1933 and 1939, Pope Pius XI made 55 formal protests to the German government. Together with Cardinal Michael von Faulhaber of Munich, Cardinal Pacelli had a major role in writing Mit Brennender Sorge, Pius XI’s 1937 encyclical condemning Nazism’s pagan ideology. This first official condemnation of Nazism by any major group drew a vengeful response from the party. The pope and the Nazis After Pius XI’s death in February 1939, Cardinal Pacelli’s experience in foreign affairs made him the logical successor. Elected on March 2, he chose as his motto Opus Justitiae Pax — Peace the Work of Justice. True to that, he called for an international conference to head off war. His first encyclical, Summi Pontificatus, published in October after the outbreak of war, condemned the German and Soviet invasions of Poland, anti-Semitism and totalitarianism. During World War II, Pope Pius XII maintained the Vatican’s traditional policy of neutrality. But in 1940, he served as a channel between German military leaders contemplating a coup to overthrow Hitler and the British government. He also passed on to the Allies information indicating that a German attack on the Low Countries was imminent. Humanitarian efforts, including aid to prisoners of war, were also a major part of the Vatican’s response to the conflict. Pius XII gave asylum in the Vatican and Castel Gandolfo to many refugees, including many Jews. On several occasions he denounced Nazi racist ideology and Jewish persecution. He also pleaded to have Rome treated as an “open city” and spared Allied bombing. And when bombs did fall — including on Rome’s largest cemetery, demolishing the tombs of the Pacelli family — he rushed to the scene to comfort the injured and bless the dead and dying. Pope Pius XII despised Nazism and considered Hitler an evil man, but he regarded Soviet Communism as an even greater menace. With good reason. Following the war, Communism spread through Eastern Europe with the backing of the Red Army. These were the years of the Church of Silence, of the imprisonment of Church leaders like Cardinal Wyszyński (Poland), Cardinal Stepinac (Yugoslavia) and Cardinal Mindszenty (Hungary), of continuing efforts to control and harass believers. In 1948 and again in 1950, Pius XII took steps to block a potentially disastrous setback — for the Church and for Western democracy — of a Communist victory in Italian elections. He called on Catholics to turn out and vote and threatened Communists and those who supported them with excommunication. The Communists lost. Life of the Church Though best remembered now for his role in the world crises of his day, Pope Pius XII also made notable contributions to Catholic doctrine and liturgy. These included the encyclicals Mystici Corporis Christi (1943) on the Church as Mystical Body of Christ, Divino Afflante Spiritu (1943) on Scripture study, and Mediator Dei (1947) on divine worship and the liturgy. He reformed the Holy Week rites and shortened the Eucharistic fast. In such ways, he laid the groundwork for the Second Vatican Council that was to take place two decades later. Very different, however, was the encyclical Humani Generis (1950), a document reminiscent of Pope St. Pius X’s warnings against modernism in its criticisms of some philosophical and theological trends of the day. In 1950, Pope Pius infallibly defined the dogma of the Virgin Mary’s bodily assumption into heaven. In talks to numerous groups, he applied Catholic moral principles to contemporary issues and developments ranging from movies to biomedical ethics. Beginning with a long illness in 1954, Pope Pius’s health declined, and he died Oct. 9, 1958. Pope Benedict XVI declared him “Venerable” in 2009. Pius XII has been criticized for supposedly not speaking out against the Nazi persecution of Jews. Much of this can be traced to “The Deputy,” a 1963 play by a left-wing German writer named Rolf Hochhuth, which depicted him as a greedy hypocrite. But Pius XII has many defenders. British historian Michael Burleigh calls him a target of “Communist-inspired denigration.” There are legitimate questions here. Did Pius XII say enough about the agony of the Jews? But what would “enough” have been in the circumstances of those times? He spoke often against anti-Semitism — as much as he thought prudent without provoking even worse reprisals by the Nazis — and certainly saved many Jewish lives. This argument no doubt will continue, but it is worth recalling that after the war Jewish leaders praised and thanked him, and the chief rabbi of Rome took the name Eugenio when he converted to Catholicism. Russell Shaw is an Our Sunday Visitor contributing editor..
Recommended publications
  • Historical Perspective on Change & Growth in the Church
    Historical Perspective on Change & Growth in the Church Don’t know much about history…. We are a historical people. God chose a people to make His own and from which would come a Savior. The Church was born not only out of the Jewish world of Pentecost but also out of the Greco-Roman world which believed that the Pax Romana was the final chapter. We, the Church, have been given the call to reveal the true Kingdom of Peace to a world still confident in its own power. The History of the Liturgy is the only way to glimpse the power of that Kingdom alive in each epoch, including our own. Jewish Roots—Meal and Word Passover and Seder Elements o Berakoth—classic blessings for food, land and Jerusalem o Todah—an account of God’s works and a petition that the prayers of Israel be heard o Tefillah—great intercessions o Kiddush—Holy is God o Haggadah—great narrative of salvation o Hallel—Psalms 113-118 recited at Passover Synagogue Elements o Readings from Torah, Prophets and Wisdom o Teachings o Singing of Cantor, mainly psalms Early Greco-Roman Elements—from home meal to House Church Paul and problem of agape in I Cor 11, from the 50’s o Divisions among you o Every one in haste to eat their supper, one goes hungry while another gets drunk o Institution Narrative o Whoever eats or drinks unworthily sins against the body and blood of the Lord o One should examine himself first, then eat and drink o Whoever eats or drinks without recognizing the body eats and drinks a judgment on himself o That is why so many are sick and dying o Therefore when
    [Show full text]
  • Mystici Corporis Christi
    MYSTICI CORPORIS CHRISTI ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XII ON THE MISTICAL BODY OF CHRIST TO OUR VENERABLE BRETHREN, PATRIARCHS, PRIMATES, ARCHBISHOPS, BISHIOPS, AND OTHER LOCAL ORDINARIES ENJOYING PEACE AND COMMUNION WITH THE APOSTOLIC SEE June 29, 1943 Venerable Brethren, Health and Apostolic Benediction. The doctrine of the Mystical Body of Christ, which is the Church,[1] was first taught us by the Redeemer Himself. Illustrating as it does the great and inestimable privilege of our intimate union with so exalted a Head, this doctrine by its sublime dignity invites all those who are drawn by the Holy Spirit to study it, and gives them, in the truths of which it proposes to the mind, a strong incentive to the performance of such good works as are conformable to its teaching. For this reason, We deem it fitting to speak to you on this subject through this Encyclical Letter, developing and explaining above all, those points which concern the Church Militant. To this We are urged not only by the surpassing grandeur of the subject but also by the circumstances of the present time. 2. For We intend to speak of the riches stored up in this Church which Christ purchased with His own Blood, [2] and whose members glory in a thorn-crowned Head. The fact that they thus glory is a striking proof that the greatest joy and exaltation are born only of suffering, and hence that we should rejoice if we partake of the sufferings of Christ, that when His glory shall be revealed we may also be glad with exceeding joy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediation of the Church in Some Pontifical Documents Francis X
    THE MEDIATION OF THE CHURCH IN SOME PONTIFICAL DOCUMENTS FRANCIS X. LAWLOR, SJ. Weston College N His recent encyclical letter, Hurnani generis, of Aug. 12, 1950, the I Holy Father reproves those who "reduce to a meaningless formula the necessity of belonging to the true Church in order to achieve eternal salvation."1 In the light of the Pope's insistence in the same encyclical letter on the ordinary, day-by-day teaching office of the Roman Pontiffs, it will be useful to select from the infra-infallible but authentic teaching of the Popes some of the abundant material touching the question of the mediatorial function of the Church in the order of salvation. The Popes, to be sure, do not speak and write after the manner of theo­ logians but as pastors of souls, and it is doubtless not always easy to transpose to a theological level what is contained in a pastoral docu­ ment and expressed in a pastoral method of approach. Yet the authentic teaching of the Popes is both a guide to, and a source of, theological thinking. The documents cited are of varying solemnity and doctrinal importance; an encyclical letter is clearly of greater magisterial value than, let us say, an occasional epistle to some prelate. It is not possible here to situate each citation in its documentary context; but the force and point of a quotation, removed from its documentary perspective, is perhaps as often lessened as augmented. Those who wish may read them in their context, if they desire a more careful appraisal of evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Catholicism Episode 6
    OUTLINE: CATHOLICISM EPISODE 6 I. The Mystery of the Church A. Can you define “Church” in a single sentence? B. The Church is not a human invention; in Christ, “like a sacrament” C. The Church is a Body, a living organism 1. “I am the vine and you are the branches” (Jn. 15) 2. The Mystical Body of Christ (Mystici Corporis Christi, by Pius XII) 3. Jesus to Saul: “Why do you persecute me?” (Acts 9:3-4) 4. Joan of Arc: The Church and Christ are “one thing” II. Ekklesia A. God created the world for communion with him (CCC, par. 760) B. Sin scatters; God gathers 1. God calls man into the unity of his family and household (CCC, par. 1) 2. God calls man out of the world C. The Church takes Christ’s life to the nations 1. Proclamation and evangelization (Lumen Gentium, 33) 2. Renewal of the temporal order (Apostolicam Actuositatem, 13) III. Four Marks of the Church A. One 1. The Church is one because God is One 2. The Church works to unite the world in God 3. The Church works to heal divisions (ecumenism) B. Holy 1. The Church is holy because her Head, Christ, is holy 2. The Church contains sinners, but is herself holy 3. The Church is made holy by God’s grace C. Catholic 1. Kata holos = “according to the whole” 2. The Church is the new Israel, universal 3. The Church transcends cultures, languages, nationalism Catholicism 1 D. Apostolic 1. From the lives, witness, and teachings of the apostles LESSON 6: THE MYSTICAL UNION OF CHRIST 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Humani Generis and the Limits of Theology Cyril Vollert, S J
    HUMANI GENERIS AND THE LIMITS OF THEOLOGY CYRIL VOLLERT, S J. St. Mary's College INCE the encyclical Humani Generis treats of "some false opinions S which threaten to undermine the foundations of Catholic doctrine/' its exceptional gravity is apparent at first glance. A second detail to attract attention is the fact that it is addressed to all the bishops of the world, not to the hierarchy of a single country. Some French writers have asserted that France is envisaged. For instance, the Parisian weekly, UObservateur politique, tconomique et litteraire, published in the issue of August 31, 1950, an article entitled, "L'Encyclique contre les nouveautes franchises." And Robert Barrat states confidently: "No one is deluded about 'Humani Generis' in France. It is France and certain currents of French theological thought to which this encyclical refers."1 Readers who are able to keep abreast of the theological writings of the day are aware that such reports are superficial. Theories condemned in the encyclical have appeared not only in France, but in Germany, Belgium, England, Italy, Spain, and elsewhere. Even in the United States, where a pioneering spirit in theological speculation is not very conspicuous, some of the repudiated opinions, for example, those dealing with evolution, polygenism, and the gratuity of the super­ natural, have found favor. Nor should anyone suppose that only certain members of two great religious orders are called to account. Tendencies reproved in the encyclical have been fostered by philosophers and theologians of various orders and congregations, of the diocesan clergy, and also of the laity.2 The encyclical did not take the Catholic world by surprise.
    [Show full text]
  • How the World Is, and Has Been Controlled by the Same Families for Millennia
    How the World is, and has been controlled by the same Families for Millennia These are the Secret Elite Families that rule the world from behind the scenes and what WE can do to change society for the better Let us begin with a quick look at the current (as of May 2015) British Prime Minister David Cameron; Aristocracy and politics Cameron descends from King William IV and his mistress Dorothea Jordan through their illegitimate daughter Lady Elizabeth FitzClarence to the fifth female generation Enid Agnes Maud Levita. His father's maternal grandmother, Stephanie Levita (née Cooper) was the daughter of Sir Alfred Cooper and Lady Agnes Duff (sister of Alexander Duff, 1st Duke of Fife) and a sister of Duff Cooper, 1st Viscount Norwich GCMG DSO PC, the Conservative statesman and author. His paternal grandmother, Enid Levita, who married secondly in 1961 a younger son of the 1st Baron Manton, was the daughter of Arthur Levita and niece of Sir Cecil Levita KCVO CBE, Chairman of London County Council in 1928. Through the Mantons, Cameron also has kinship with the 3rd Baron Hesketh KBE PC, Conservative Chief Whip in the House of Lords 1991–93. Cameron's maternal grandfather was Sir William Mount, 2nd Baronet, an army officer and the High Sheriff of Berkshire, and Cameron's maternal great-grandfather was Sir William Mount Bt CBE, Conservative MP for Newbury 1910–1922. Lady Ida Feilding, Cameron's great-great grandmother, was third daughter of William Feilding, Earl of Denbigh and Desmond GCH PC, a courtier and Gentleman of the Bedchamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Mediator Dei
    MEDIATOR DEI ENCYCLICAL OF POPE PIUS XII ON THE SACRED LITURGY TO THE VENERABLE BRETHREN, THE PATRIARCHS, PRIMATES, ARCHBISHOPS, BISHIOPS, AND OTHER ORDINARIES IN PEACE AND COMMUNION WITH THE APOSTOLIC SEE Venerable Brethren, Health and Apostolic Benediction. Mediator between God and men[1] and High Priest who has gone before us into heaven, Jesus the Son of God[2] quite clearly had one aim in view when He undertook the mission of mercy which was to endow mankind with the rich blessings of supernatural grace. Sin had disturbed the right relationship between man and his Creator; the Son of God would restore it. The children of Adam were wretched heirs to the infection of original sin; He would bring them back to their heavenly Father, the primal source and final destiny of all things. For this reason He was not content, while He dwelt with us on earth, merely to give notice that redemption had begun, and to proclaim the long-awaited Kingdom of God, but gave Himself besides in prayer and sacrifice to the task of saving souls, even to the point of offering Himself, as He hung from the cross, a Victim unspotted unto God, to purify our conscience of dead works, to serve the living God.[3] Thus happily were all men summoned back from the byways leading them down to ruin and disaster, to be set squarely once again upon the path that leads to God. Thanks to the shedding of the blood of the Immaculate Lamb, now each might set about the personal task of achieving his own sanctification, so rendering to God the glory due to Him.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhe2009-3-4/Art4-Schelkens/ Eti 856 the Louvain Faculty of Theology 857 the Decades Before Vatican II
    Tilburg University The Louvain Faculty of Theology and the Modern(ist) Heritage. Reconciling History and Theology Schelkens, Karim Published in: Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique DOI: https://doi.org/10.1484/J.RHE.3.218 Publication date: 2009 Document Version Version created as part of publication process; publisher's layout; not normally made publicly available Link to publication in Tilburg University Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Schelkens, K. (2009). The Louvain Faculty of Theology and the Modern(ist) Heritage. Reconciling History and Theology. Revue d’Histoire Ecclésiastique, 104(3-4), 856-891. https://doi.org/10.1484/J.RHE.3.218 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 29. sep. 2021 THE LOUVAIN FACULTY OF THEOLOGY AND THE MODERN(IST) HERITAGE RECONCILING HISTORY AND THEOLOGY Introduction In his 1992 studyon the vota prepared bythe Louvain theological facultyin view of the Second Vatican Council, Mathijs Lamberigts has shown that these preconciliar vota deal with a significant variety of themes.
    [Show full text]
  • Solidarity and Mediation in the French Stream Of
    SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Dissertation Submitted to The College of Arts and Sciences of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in Theology By Timothy R. Gabrielli Dayton, Ohio December 2014 SOLIDARITY AND MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. APPROVED BY: _________________________________________ William L. Portier, Ph.D. Faculty Advisor _________________________________________ Dennis M. Doyle, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Anthony J. Godzieba, Ph.D. Outside Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Vincent J. Miller, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Sandra A. Yocum, Ph.D. Faculty Reader _________________________________________ Daniel S. Thompson, Ph.D. Chairperson ii © Copyright by Timothy R. Gabrielli All rights reserved 2014 iii ABSTRACT SOLIDARITY MEDIATION IN THE FRENCH STREAM OF MYSTICAL BODY OF CHRIST THEOLOGY Name: Gabrielli, Timothy R. University of Dayton Advisor: William L. Portier, Ph.D. In its analysis of mystical body of Christ theology in the twentieth century, this dissertation identifies three major streams of mystical body theology operative in the early part of the century: the Roman, the German-Romantic, and the French-Social- Liturgical. Delineating these three streams of mystical body theology sheds light on the diversity of scholarly positions concerning the heritage of mystical body theology, on its mid twentieth-century recession, as well as on Pope Pius XII’s 1943 encyclical, Mystici Corporis Christi, which enshrined “mystical body of Christ” in Catholic magisterial teaching. Further, it links the work of Virgil Michel and Louis-Marie Chauvet, two scholars remote from each other on several fronts, in the long, winding French stream.
    [Show full text]
  • FAITH & Reason
    FAITH & REASON THE JOURNAL of CHRISTENDOM COLLEGE Spring 1997 | Vol. XXIII, No. 1 The Encyclical Spiritus Paraclitus in its Historical Context Brian W. Harrison, O.S. I. WAS SPIRITUS PARACLITUS RENDERED OBSOLETE BY DIVINO AFFLANTE SPIRITU? EPTEMBER 1995 MARKED THE SEVENTY-FIFTH ANNIVERSARY OF A HIGHLY SIGNIFI- cant document of the Catholic Church’s Magisterium: the Encyclical Letter Spiritus Paraclitus, issued by Pope Benedict XV on September 15, 1920, to mark the 1500th anniversary of the death of the great- est Scripture scholar of the ancient Church, St. Jerome.1 The Pontiff took advantage of that landmark centenary for laying down in this encyclical further norms and guidelines for exegetes, a quarter-century after the promulgation of the great magna carta of modem Catholic biblical studies, Leo XIII’s Encycli- cal Providentissimus Deus (November 18, 1893).1 The Catholic press made little if any mention of the anniversary of Spiritus Paraclitus, which in truth is now an almost forgotten encyclical. Indeed, on the rare occasions when it is remembered at all by to- day’s most prominent Scripture scholars, the context usually appears to be one of disdain for its doctrine and regret for its allegedly negative effect on biblical scholarship. For instance, Fr. Joseph A. Fitzmyer, in a recently published commentary on the 1993 document of the Pontifical Biblical Commission, feels it appropriate to express quite the opposite of gratitude for Spiritus Paraclitus. He does not find Benedict XV’s encyclical worthy of mention in the main text of his historical account of the Catholic biblical movement, but writes in a footnote: If we are grateful today for the encyclicals of Popes Leo XIII and Pius XII on biblical studies, we have to recall that between them there also appeared the encyclical of Pope Benedict XV, Spiritus Paraclitus,..
    [Show full text]
  • Fr. Luigi Villa: Probably John XXIII and Paul VI Initiated in the Freemasonry?
    PAUL VI… BEATIFIED? By father Doctor LUIGI VILLA PAUL VI… BEATIFIED? By father Doctor LUIGI VILLA (First Edition: February 1998 – in italian) (Second Edition: July 2001 –in italian) EDITRICE CIVILTà Via Galileo Galilei, 121 25123 BRESCIA (ITALY) PREFACE Paul VI was always an enigma to all, as Pope John XXIII did himself observe. But today, after his death, I believe that can no longer be said. In the light, in fact, of his numerous writings and speeches and of his actions, the figure of Paul VI is clear of any ambiguity. Even if corroborating it is not so easy or simple, he having been a very complex figure, both when speaking of his preferences, by way of suggestions and insinuations, and for his abrupt leaps from idea to idea, and when opting for Tradition, but then presently for novelty, and all in language often very inaccurate. It will suffice to read, for example, his Addresses of the General Audiences, to see a Paul VI prey of an irreducible duality of thought, a permanent conflict between his thought and that of the Church, which he was nonetheless to represent. Since his time at Milan, not a few called him already “ ‘the man of the utopias,’ an Archbishop in pursuit of illusions, generous dreams, yes, yet unreal!”… Which brings to mind what Pius X said of the Chiefs of the Sillon1: “… The exaltation of their sentiments, the blind goodness of their hearts, their philosophical mysticisms, mixed … with Illuminism, have carried them toward another Gospel, in which they thought they saw the true Gospel of our Savior…”2.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclica. Divino Afflante Spiritu A
    Cooperatorum Veritatis Societas Excerpta ex Documenta Catholica Omnia 1943-09-30 - SS Pius XII - Encyclica. Divino Afflante Spiritu A. A. S. XXXV (1943), pp. 297-325 PIUS PP. XII LITTERAE ENCYCLICAE DIVINO AFFLANTE SPIRITU AD VENERABILES FRATRES PATRIARCHAS, PRIMATES, ARCHIEPISCOPOS, EPISCOPOS ALIOSQUE LOCORUM ORDINARIOS PACEM ET COMMUNIONEM CUM APOSTOLICA SEDE HABENTES ITEMQUE AD UNIVERSUM CLERUM ET CHRISTIFIDELES CATHOLICI ORBIS: DE SACRORUM BIBLIORUM STUDIIS OPPORTUNE PROVEHENDIS VENERABILES FRATRES, DILECTI FILII SALUTEM ET APOSTOLICAM BENEDICTIONEM Divino afflante Spiritu, illos Sacri Scriptores exararunt libros, quos Deus, pro sua erga hominum genus paterna caritate, dilargiri voluit «ad docendum, ad arguendum, ad corripiendum, ad erudiendum in iustitia, ut perfectus sit homo Dei, ad omne opus bonum instructus»1. Nihil igitur mirum, si Sancta Ecclesia hunc e caelo datum thesaurum, quem doctrinae de fide et moribus pretiosissimum habet fontem divinamque normam, ut ex Apostolorum manibus illibatum accepit, ita omni cum cura custodivit, a quavis falsa et perversa interpretatione defendit, et ad munus supernam impertiendi animis salutem sollicite adhibuit, quemadmodum paene innumera cuiusvis aetatis documenta luculenter testantur. Recentioribus autem temporibus, Sacras Litteras, cum divina earum origo et recta earumdem explanatio peculiari ratione in discrimen vocarentur, maiore etiam alacritate et studio tutandas ac protegendas suscepit Ecclesia. Itaque iam sacrosancta Tridentina Synodus «libros integros cum omnibus suis partibus,
    [Show full text]