DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi 2000 Pascagoula River Basin Section 305(B) Water Quality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mississippi 2000 Pascagoula River Basin Section 305(B) Water Quality State of Mississippi Water Quality Assessment 2000 Section 305(b) Report Pascagoula River Basin Supplement MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY November 2000 Prepared by: Office of Pollution Control, Surface Water Division Water Quality Assessment Branch Post Office Box 10385 Jackson, MS 39289-0385 (601) 961-5171 Introduction The intent of 305(b) reporting is for Mississippi to describe the status of the quality of the state’s surface and ground waters for EPA, Congress, and the public. This report is required pursuant to Section 305(b) of the Federal Clean Water Act and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) is the state agency responsible for generating this document. For the 2000 305(b) Report, EPA has requested an abbreviated version of the existing 1998 document cataloging only the significant changes that have occurred since the last report. For more information about the contents of the Mississippi 1998 Water Quality Assessment Federal Clean Water Act Section 305(b) Report, refer to Appendix A of this document which contains the Table of Contents for that report. Surface water quality data, ground water data, and other environmental information for the state are compiled and summarized in Mississippi’s Section 305(b) Report. Monitoring data is collected by the MDEQ throughout the state through several different monitoring activities: Fixed Station Monitoring Network, Basin Monitoring Networks, intensive surveys and other special water quality studies. This data is used for many purposes, but is collectively analyzed and reported on biennially in the Section 305(b) Report. For this report, the water quality information collected by MDEQ, as well as data provided by other agencies and institutions, are assessed as to whether a waterbody meets its designated use or uses. Waters assessed as not fully supporting their uses in the 305(b) assessment process become candidates for listing on Mississippi’s Section 303(d) List of Impaired Waterbodies. Beginning with the 2000 305(b) Report, Mississippi is moving from a statewide 305(b) assessment approach to a more concentrated basin rotation approach which is implemented over a five year period. Water quality assessments will be conducted annually with each assessment rotating among the state’s five basin groups, each of which represents approximately one-fifth of the state. This basinwide approach to water quality management allows the state to focus all of its resources in a smaller geographical area/basin in a given year in order to provide a more thorough assessment for that area. At the end of each five-year cycle, a comprehensive assessment of the state will have been completed. With the basin approach, Mississippi is able to integrate all types of water quality program activities on a basin level. As the development of this approach continues, program activities such as permitting, monitoring, modeling, point and non- point source programs, and basin management planning will be implemented on a basin level. For the 2000 305(b) Report, the Pascagoula River Basin, MDEQ’s first of the five rotating basin groups to receive focused monitoring, is assessed; therefore, only data that were collected in the Pascagoula River Basin is analyzed and presented in this report. The remaining four basin groups will be re-evaluated and assessed on an annual basis as Mississippi progresses through the five-year rotating basin phase. 2 Catalog of Changes from the 1998 Report In compliance with the abbreviated format of the 2000 305(b) Report, the only changes that are being represented in the body of this report from the existing 1998 305(b) Report are in Part II: Background, Special State Concerns and Recommendations sections, and Part III: Surface Water Assessment, Chapter 2, Assessment Methodology and Summary Data, Chapter 7, Public Health and Aquatic Life Concerns, and Chapter 8, Basin/Waterbody Information. 3 Part II: Background Special State Concerns In the past, the major water quality problems in Mississippi have been the result of industrial and municipal point source discharges in the heavily populated Gulf Coast and Jackson Metropolitan areas, from nonpoint source pollution in the Mississippi Delta, and from the oil production industry. Impacts from waste discharges have been greatly reduced across the state due to point source control activities, which have resulted in significant improvements in water quality conditions in streams below these discharges. Improvements have also been realized in the Delta and other agricultural areas from better management of the use of pesticides, the development of less persistent chemicals, and the education of farmers in the installation of Best Management Practices. Many of the oil production related problems have also been resolved. Control of nonpoint source pollution is generally regarded as one of Mississippi’s greatest challenges in the future. MDEQ's water pollution control programs, to date, have been effective in correcting water quality problems caused by point sources. Current assessments of water quality in streams and lakes indicate that nonpoint sources of pollution, rather than point sources, are responsible for the majority of the State's impaired waters. Once the remaining needs for Publicly Owned Treatment Works are addressed, additional focus on nonpoint sources of pollution will be needed to attain further water quality improvements. Also, additional planning will be required to develop implementation strategies for nonpoint source control measures. To facilitate this goal, grants or cost-share programs will be necessary to implement controls for agricultural activities. Additionally, urban runoff must be addressed before water quality problems can be completely solved in highly populated areas, particularly along the Gulf Coast and other rapidly growing urban areas. Problems caused by failing septic systems along the Gulf Coast and the shorelines of many lakes must also be addressed. The loss of the state’s wetlands is another issue of concern for Mississippi. Wetlands provide many benefits including fish and wildlife habitat and natural control of erosion. Water quality functions of wetlands include floodwater retention, ground water recharge, sediment stabilization, and pollutant assimilation. Historically, Mississippi's wetland losses were due primarily to conversion to agriculture. However, now urban wetland areas are at higher risk due to increased pressure from residential and commercial development. The issue of toxic pollutants is another major concern. To address this, Mississippi has adopted widely expanded toxics criteria into its water quality standards. Parameters of particular concern are some of the pesticides, mercury, and PCBs. Where necessary, biological screening and chemical monitoring will be used to assess the extent of contamination. 4 The rapid industrial growth occurring throughout the state and the demands this economic development may place on the State’s environmental resources is another growing area of concern. Historically, Mississippi has always been characterized as a rural state, however, with the advent of the gaming industry as well as a favorable economic climate, this is gradually changing. Previously, only Jackson and the Gulf Coast served as the major population and industrial centers. In recent years, however, economic development and growth are being experienced not only in Jackson and the Gulf Coast, but also in Hattiesburg, Meridian, Tupelo and Northwest Mississippi. Specific State Concerns Mississippi Gulf Coast In the past, elevated bacterial counts have caused concern in swimming and shellfish harvesting areas along the Mississippi Sound. This situation had developed over many years due to the lack of proper planning and the necessary ordinances or controls to ensure proper wastewater disposal. Developments had been allowed to install individual home disposal systems in areas where these systems do not work properly. Also, there were over one hundred fifty private sewage systems discharging wastewater to coastal streams. Improvements in water quality have occurred with the implementation of regional sewage treatment plants for the three-county area. All publicly owned treatment works along the Gulf Coast have now completed the construction necessary to bring these facilities into compliance with current water quality standards. However, with the ongoing growth of the gaming industry, there have been some facility expansions. The Harrison County Wastewater and Solid Waste Management District completed expansion of the Keegan Bayou Facility (MS0023159). Also, they completed construction of a new facility to serve the Gulfport area, known as Gulfport North (MS0051756). The Mississippi Gulf Coast Regional Wastewater Authority also expanded the Escatawpa Facility (MS0021521). Growth will likely continue over the next several years. An issue of concern over the past several years has been the increased growth of Hancock County and the resulting inadequate wastewater treatment facilities coupled with failing home disposal systems in that area of the state. Due to state and local cooperative efforts, there have been significant wastewater improvements in Hancock County over the past few years. Over 5,000 residences in and around the town of Waveland, that were previously on inadequate home systems, have been incorporated into a waste water management district which is undergoing a process of implementing a collection system composed of pressure sewers.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multi-Jurisdictional Hazard Mitigation Plan for Southwest Mississippi
    - 1 - Table of Contents ITEM Page List of Maps 4 List of Tables 5 List of Figures 9 Introduction 10 1: Southwest District Characteristics 12 1.1: Geography 12 1.2: Demographics 17 1.3: Climate 23 1.4: Economy 23 2: Documentation of the Planning Process 25 2.1: Background 25 2.2: Plan Jurisdictions 25 2.3: Methodology 26 2.4: Roles of the Participants 26 PDD Staff 26 Jurisdictional Representatives 27 2.5: Involvement of the Public and/or Other Interested Parties 27 3: Risk Assessment 30 3.1: Organization of this Section 30 3.2: Critical Facilities 30 3.3: Hazard Identification 30 3.4: Earthquake 32 3.5: Hurricane 35 3.6: Flooding 39 Types of Flooding 39 3.7: Tornado 56 Tornado Severity 56 3.8: Dam Failure 61 3.9: Wildfire 64 3.10: Radiological Disaster 67 3.11: Winter Storm 68 3.12: Assessing Vulnerability-Overall Summary and Impact 69 4: Comprehensive Regional Hazard Mitigation Program 99 - 2 - Introduction 99 4.1: Goals and Objectives 99 Goals 99 Objectives 100 4.2: Local Capability Assessment 100 General Authorities and Programs 100 Planning and Zoning 101 Fire Codes 101 Building and Other Codes 101 Local Emergency Management 102 Water Management and Flood Control Districts 102 Flood Insurance 103 Tables of Community Mitigation Capability Assessment 103 4.3: Hazard Mitigation Strategies 106 Earthquake 107 Hurricane 120 Flooding 188 Tornado 225 Dam Failure 251 Wildfire 275 Radiological Hazard 302 Winter Storm 333 5: Plan Maintenance Process 348 5.1: Monitoring, Evaluating and Updating the Plan 348 Monitoring 348 Evaluating 348 Updating
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-900-b 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Jan. 1987) United States Department of the Interior; National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing________________________________________ HISTORIC RESOURCES OF PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI B. Associated Historic Contexts____________________________________________ DEVELOPMENT IN PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI - 1850-1941 fa.) Early Pascagmila to 187f)_____________________________ (b. ) Pascagrmla from 187fl -ho 1Q1 7________________________________ (c.) Pascagoula between the World Wars, 1917 - 1941.__________-___ C. Geographical Data _____________________________ See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. t^v^dtfc: A <F <P^^_,_________ Per. 24, Signature of certifying official . Date Depyi-ty state Historic Preservation Officer_________________________ State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple^roperty documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related piQpe/iesymor listina in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA)
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 10/01/2013 to 12/31/2013 National Forests In Mississippi This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact National Forests In Mississippi, Forestwide (excluding Projects occurring in more than one Forest) R8 - Southern Region Revised LRMP for the NFs in - Land management planning In Progress: Expected:12/2013 03/2014 Jeff Long Mississippi DEIS NOA in Federal Register 601-965-1629 EIS 02/08/2013 [email protected] Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2013 Description: Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Web Link: http://www.fs.fed.us/nepa/nepa_project_exp.php?project=1159 Location: UNIT - National Forests In Mississippi All Units. STATE - Mississippi. COUNTY - Adams, Amite, Benton, Chickasaw, Choctaw, Copiah, Forrest, Franklin, George, Greene, Harrison, Jackson, Jasper, Jefferson, Jones, Lafayette, Lincoln, Marshall, Newton, Oktibbeha, Pearl River, Perry, Pontotoc, Scott, Sharkey, Smith, Stone, Tippah, Union, Wayne, Wilkinson, Winston, Yalobusha. LEGAL - Not Applicable. Mississippi. National Forests In Mississippi Bienville Ranger District (excluding Projects occurring in more than one District) R8 - Southern Region Granville Freeman Access - Special use management In Progress: Expected:10/2013 10/2013 Marc Weathersby CE 215 Comment Period Legal 601-469-3811 Notice 08/29/2013 [email protected] s Description: Mr. Granville Freeman has requested a special use permit to allow access to his property by crossing National Forest land along a historical access route. The access corridor is approximately 20 ft. wide and extends approximately 700 feet in length.
    [Show full text]
  • Never Quite Settled: Southern Plain Folk on the Move Ronald J
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2013 Never Quite Settled: Southern Plain Folk on the Move Ronald J. McCall East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the United States History Commons Recommended Citation McCall, Ronald J., "Never Quite Settled: Southern Plain Folk on the Move" (2013). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 1121. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/1121 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Never Quite Settled: Southern Plain Folk on the Move __________________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of History East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in History ___________________________ by Ronald J. McCall May 2013 ________________________ Dr. Steven N. Nash, Chair Dr. Tom D. Lee Dr. Dinah Mayo-Bobee Keywords: Family History, Southern Plain Folk, Herder, Mississippi Territory ABSTRACT Never Quite Settled: Southern Plain Folk on the Move by Ronald J. McCall This thesis explores the settlement of the Mississippi Territory through the eyes of John Hailes, a Southern yeoman farmer, from 1813 until his death in 1859. This is a family history. As such, the goal of this paper is to reconstruct John’s life to better understand who he was, why he left South Carolina, how he made a living in Mississippi, and to determine a degree of upward mobility.
    [Show full text]
  • State Geological Survey
    MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM CLIFFORD MORSE, Ph.D. Director BULLETIN 68 SURFACE WATERS OF MISSISSIPPI PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF IRVING E. ANDERSON, DISTRICT ENGINEER THE DISTRICT OFFICE, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY in cooperation with MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY, MISSISSIPPI 1950 Please do not destroy this report; rather return it to the Mississippi Geological Survey, University, Mississippi, and receive postage refund. MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WILLIAM CLIFFORD MORSE, Ph.D. Director BULLETIN 68 SURFACE WATERS OF MISSISSIPPI PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECTION OF IRVING E. ANDERSON, DISTRICT ENGINEER THE DISTRICT OFFICE, WATER RESOURCES DIVISION UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY In Cooperation with MISSISSIPPI STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY UNIVERSITY, MISSISSIPPI 1950 MISSISSIPPI GEOLOGICAL SURVEY COMMISSION His Excellency, Fielding Lewis Wright -— .Governor Hon. Jackson McWhirter Tubb.. State Superintendent of Education Hon. John Davis Williams Chancellor, University of Mississippi Hon. Fred T. Mitchell President, Mississippi State College Hon. William David McCain....Director, Dept. of Archives and History STAFF William Clifford Morse, Ph.D —Director Franklin Earl Vestal, M. S ....Geologist James S. Attaya, B. S ...Geologist Jimmie McBay Bradley, A. A .Secretary LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Office of the State Geological Survey University, Mississippi October 7, 1950 To His Excellency, Governor Fielding Lewis Wright, Chairman, and Members of the Geological Commission Gentlemen: The records of stream flow of the Mississippi State Geological Survey and the U. S. Geological Survey have been published annually by the Federal Survey as a part of an annual Water-Supply Paper, since the beginning of the cooperation of these two agencies. To make this information more readily accessible to the citizens of Mississippi and to others, these records, although not in as much detail, are here brought together as State Geological Survey Bulletin 68, Surface Water of Mississippi.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Catherine Creek National Wildlife Refuge
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service St. Catherine Creek National Wildlife Refuge Refuge Facts ■ Provide habitat and protection for ■ Established: 1990. endangered and threatened species including the peregrine falcon, ■ Acres: 24,445, with a potential size bald eagle, big-eared bat and the of 34,256 acres. alligator. ■ Other management: conservation ■ Provide habitat for natural easements - seven in five counties, diversity of wildlife and plant totaling 3,935 acres; fee title tracts species. - two in three counties, totaling 460 photo:USFWS acres. ■ Provide opportunities for wildlife-oriented recreation and ■ Refuge located in the western environmental education when section of Adams County in compatible with other refuge southwest Mississippi, seven miles objectives. south of Natchez, Mississippi. The western boundary of the refuge Management Tools is the Mississippi River with the ■ Water management for waterfowl, eastern boundary following the wood storks and wading bird photo:USFWS bluffs and the southern boundary, rookeries. the Homochitto River. ■ Cooperative farming. Natural History ■ ■ Habitat within St. Catherine Creek Prescribed fire. NWR offers a myriad of ecological ■ Mechanical/chemical control of niches for wildlife. noxious plants. ■ Cypress swamps and hardwood ■ Deer management with public forests teeming with oak, gum, elm, hunting. ash and cottonwood comprise 30 percent of the refuge. ■ Education/interpretation. ■ Ten percent of the acreage is open ■ Law enforcement. water, while the remaining area photo:USFWS consists of cleared land and land ■ Partnerships. created due to the meandering of Public Use Opportunities the Mississippi River. ■ Trails. ■ Rains and backwater flooding fill ■ Fishing. depressions and basins in low areas creating optimum wintering ground ■ Wildlife observation. for waterfowl.
    [Show full text]
  • In Mississippi National Forests
    SUMMARY Little is known about the distribution of freshwater mussels in Mississippi national forests. Review of the scant available infor- mation revealed that the national forests harbor a diverse mus- sel fauna of possibly 46 or more species (including confirmed, probable, and potential occurrences). Occurrence of 33 species is confirmed. Because of the geographic, physiographic, and drain- age basin diversity of Mississippi national forests, there is con- siderable variation in mussel communities among the national forests. Three distinct fauna1 groups are represented in Missis- sippi national forests, each with a characteristic assemblage of species. One species of potential occurrence is a federally endan- gered species, 1 species of confirmed occurrence is a candidate for listing, and 11 species of confirmed or probable occurrence are considered of special concern by the American Fisheries Society (Williams and others 1993). None of the national forests have been surveyed adequately, and specific population data are almost com- pletely lacking. This review of existing information represents the first of a three-phase program needed to comprehensively evalu- ate the mussel resources of Mississippi national forests. Phase two involves an exhaustive, qualitative field survey of Mississippi national forests to document precise distribution of species and location of important communities. Phase three consists of a quan- titative study of important communities in order to assess repro- ductive characteristics and viability and to establish baseline density estimates for monitoring of future population trends. Cover: left, Lampsilis cardium; top right, Utterbackia imbecillis; bottom right, Potamilus ohiensis. Current Distributional Information on Freshwater Mussels (family Unionidae) in Mississippi National Forests Wendell R.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Form 10-9OQ..b OMS No 1024-{)O '8 (Jan. \987) " United States Department of the Interior; National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This form is for use in documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing Narional Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Type all entries. A. Name of Multiple Property Listing HISTORIC RESOURCES OF PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI B. Associated Historic Contexts DEVELOPMENT IN PASCAGOULA, MISSISSIPPI - 1850-1941 ( a. ) Early Pascagollla to 1870 ( b. ) PascagollJa from 1870 to 1917 ( c. ) Pascagoula between the World Wars, 1917 - 1941. C. Geographical Data N0 See continuation sheet D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Planning and Evaluation. ~ f-{. cp'V~ DCT. 24-, /9~1 Signature of certifying official Date Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer State or Federal agency and bureau I, hereby, certify that this multiple property documentation form has been approved by the National Register as a basis for evaluating related prope'rties for listing in the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Gulf Sturgeon of the Pascagoula River: Post-Katrina Assessment of Seasonal Usage of the Lower Estuary
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Summer 8-2010 Gulf Sturgeon of the Pascagoula River: Post-Katrina Assessment of Seasonal Usage of the Lower Estuary Jeanne-Marie Dawn Havrylkoff University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Recommended Citation Havrylkoff, Jeanne-Marie Dawn, "Gulf Sturgeon of the Pascagoula River: Post-Katrina Assessment of Seasonal Usage of the Lower Estuary" (2010). Master's Theses. 498. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/498 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi GULF STURGEON OF THE PASCAGOULA RIVER: POST-KATRINA ASSESSMENT OF SEASONAL USAGE OF THE LOWER ESTUARY by Jeanne-Marie Dawn Havrylkoff A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Approved: August 2010 ABSTRACT GULF STURGEON OF THE PASCAGOULA RIVER: POST-KATRINA ASSESSMENT OF SEASONAL USAGE OF THE LOWER ESTUARY by Jeanne-Marie Dawn Havrylkoff August 2010 The Pascagoula watershed likely offers the greatest possibility for the survival of the Gulf sturgeon, Acipenser oxyrinchus desotoi within Mississippi. The focus of this project was to determine the routes Gulf sturgeon take through the lower Pascagoula River which splits at river kilometer 23 into two distinct distributaries. Sampling for this project was conducted over 60 d in 11 months throughout a two year period with a total of 81 ,947 net-meter-hours.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 the Pascagoula River Basin
    Contents Water—Our Precious Natural Resource. 3 Mississippi’s Water Resources . 4 Welcome to the Pascagoula River Basin . 6 Special Plants and Animals of the Pascagoula River Basin . 13 Land Use and Its Effects on Water Quality . 16 Water Quality in the Pascagoula River Basin . 21 Gulf Region Water and Wastewater Plan . 26 Mississippi’s Basin Management Approach . 27 Priority Watersheds . 28 Agencies and Organizations Cooperating for Improved Water Quality . 33 Sustaining Our Environmental Resources and Economic Development . 35 About this Guide Acknowledgments Mississippi’s Citizen’s Guides to Water This guide is a product of the Basin Team for the Quality are intended to inform you about: Pascagoula River Basin, consisting of representatives from 39 state and federal Mississippi’s abundant water resources agencies and stakeholder organizations (see Natural features, human activities, and pages 33–34 of this document for a complete water quality in a particular river basin listing). The lead agency for developing, distributing, and funding this guide is the The importance of a healthy environ- Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality ment to a strong economy (MDEQ). This effort was completed in 2008 under a Clean Water Act Section 319 Nonpoint Watersheds targeted for water quality restoration and protection activities Source grant, and includes publication services from Tetra Tech, Inc. How to participate in protecting or Copies of this guide may be obtained by restoring water quality contacting: Mississippi Department of Whom to contact for more information Environmental Quality Office of Pollution Control We hope these guides will enhance the 515 East Amite Street dialogue between citizens and key decision Jackson, MS 39201 makers to help improve our management 601-961-5171 of Mississippi’s precious water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • South Independent Streams Basin
    SOUTH INDEPENDENT STREAMS BASIN Name of Waterway From To Date Bayou Pierre MS State Highway 28; southwest Mississippi River; west of 1988 of Hazlehurst, MS; west of U.S. Port Gibson, MS; northwest Interstate 55; in central Copiah of Alcorn, MS; just north of County MS State Highway 552; in 31° 49′ 42″ / 90° 28′ 54″ southwest Claiborne County 31° 54′ 49″ / 90° 11′ 31″ White Oak Creek Confluence of Saddlers Creek; Bayou Pierre; just south- 1988 southeast of Utica, MS; south of west of Carpenter, MS; south- MS State Highway 27; east of MS west of Utica, MS; between State Highway 18; just north of MS State Highway 18 and the Hinds / Copiah County line; in Illinois Central Railroad; in Hinds County northwest Copiah County 32° 03′ 13″ / 90° 34′ 17″ 32° 01′ 13″ / 90° 41′ 27″ Little Bayou Pierre Confluence of Jameson Branch; Bayou Pierre; just north- 1990 southeast of Port Gibson, MS; west of Port Gibson, MS; southeast of Hermanville, MS; east of Anthony Street; west between MS State Highways 548 of U.S. Highway 61; in west and 547; in southeast Claiborne central Claiborne County County 31° 58′ 36″ / 90° 00′ 49″ 31° 54′ 28″ / 90° 46′ 53″ Coles Creek Origin, confluence of North Fork Mississippi River; west of 1990 Coles Creek and South Fork Fayette, MS; north of Coles Creek; northwest of Fayette, Natchez, MS; in Adams MS; north of MS State Highway County 553; west of Natchez Trace 31° 44′ 01″ / 91° 22′ 34″ Parkway; in west Jefferson County 31° 45′ 55″ / 91° 10′ 57″ North Fork Coles Confluence of Shankstown Coles Creek; origin, con- 1990 Creek Creek; southwest of Lorman, MS; fluence of South Fork Coles between U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A River to CROSS
    HOLLIS MCGEHEE A River to CROSS (A Story of Life) Copyright 2018 by Hollis McGehee All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form without written permission from the author. ISBN: 978-0-9981884-3-0 Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture quotations in this publication are taken from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®) copyright © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. ESV® Text Edition: 2011. The ESV® text has been reproduced in cooperation with and by permission of Good News Publishers. Unauthorized reproduction of this publication is prohibited. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked (niv) are taken from THE HOLY BIBLE, NEW INTERNATIONAL VERSION®, NIV® Copyright © 1973, 1978, 1984, 2011 by Biblica, Inc.® Used by permission. All rights reserved worldwide. Scripture quotations marked (nlt) are taken from the Holy Bible, New Living Translation, copyright © 1996, 2004, 2007, 2013 by Tyndale House Foundation. Used by permission of Tyndale House Publishers, Inc., Carol Stream, Illinois 60188. All rights reserved. Scripture marked (nkjv) is taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson. Used by permission. All rights reserved. Scripture quotations marked (amp) are taken from the Amplified Bible, Copyright © 2015 by The Lockman Foundation, Used by permission. www.Lockman. org. Scripture quotations marked (kjv) are taken from the King James Bible and are public domain. Table of Contents Author’s Note �� � � � � � � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]