Reader’s Guide: by and Paul Clark Newell, Jr.

April 18th, 2014

When Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Bill Dedman noticed in 2009 a grand home for sale, unoccupied for nearly sixty years, he stumbled through a surprising portal into American history. Empty Mansions, a New York Times bestseller, is a rich mystery of wealth and loss, connecting the Gilded Age opulence of the nineteenth century with a twenty-first-century battle over a $300 million inheritance.

This book is great for a book club discussion! If this is in your book club’s queue, then we have the perfect discussion to help frame your chat. Enjoy!

Questions and Topics for Discussion

1. and Hilton: compare and contrast. Using the theme of the burdens of inherited wealth, in which era would it be easier or harder to be a young heiress, the 1920s or today? Can you imagine being that wealthy and not sharing your opinions and daily adventures on social media?

2. The authors reject easy explanations for Huguette’s eccentricity and reclusive nature, emphasizing that she was always shy, living a life of imagination and art. As they say in the epilogue:

We will never know why Huguette was, as she might say, “peculiar.” The people in her inner circle say they have no idea. Out- siders speculate. It was being the daughter of an older father! It was her sister’s death! Or her mother’s! The wealth! It was autism or Asperger’s or a childhood trauma! Easy answers fail because the question assumes that personalities have a single determinant. Whatever caused her shyness, her limitations of sociability or coping, her fears—of strangers, of kidnapping, of needles, of another French Revolution—Huguette found a situation that worked for her, a modern-day “Boo” Radley, shut up inside by choice, safe from a world that can hurt.

Do you accept the authors’ embrace of complexity and uncertainty? Or do you think of Huguette’s reclusivity as springing from a single cause—e.g., failed romances, her sister’s death, a mental illness?

3. What is your reaction to nurse Hadassah Peri and the $31 million in gifts Huguette gave to her family? Do you agree with readers who say her behavior was despicable, that it’s unethical for a caregiver to receive such gifts, that she should have refused the gifts? Or do you agree with readers who say Huguette certainly knew what she was doing, that Hadassah was her patient’s closest caregiver for twenty years, that the gifts were only a small share of Huguette’s net worth?

4. Was Huguette’s life a happy one? What are the ingredients of a happy life? If you find her life to be sad, how do you reconcile that with her apparent lack of sadness?

5. If you had been on the jury deciding the battle over Huguette’s will and her $300 million estate, would you have found that she was incompetent and defrauded? Would you have given all her money to her Clark relatives? Or would you have followed the will, giving it all to the nurse, the Bellosguardo Foundation for the arts, the attorney Bock, the accountant Kamsler, Dr. Singman, Beth Israel Medical Center, the , her goddaughter Wanda, and the personal assistant Chris? Which of those people, on either side, do you trust?

6. Was W. A. Clark an admirable man? Or was he admirable only early on, when he was like a Horatio Alger character working arduously in dangerous circumstances to build a copper fortune? In light of the times in which he lived, was W.A. Clark justifiably vilified for his methods in seeking a Senate seat? Was he actually a robber baron? Is he accountable for environmental waste today from the copper mines he developed in the 1870s? Or was this simply business as usual in the sordid world of politics and development on the Western frontier? If Clark had been as generous to public charities as Carnegie or Rockefeller, would he have been absolved by history, as they largely were, of the sins of his business career?

7. Empty Mansions is based on facts, documents, and testimony. That leaves mysteries in the lives of its characters. Did the uncertainties add or detract from your enjoyment of the story? Would you have preferred that the authors psychoanalyze Huguette, creating dialogue and filling in missing scenes as a screenplay would? Considering the limits of what the authors could learn, what do you most want to know about W.A., about Anna, about Huguette? If you could have had conversations with Huguette, as author Paul Newell did, what would you have asked her?

8. Is there more to the American Dream than financial security? Does it require making a contribution to society? Did W.A.’s American Dream get out of control? Is Huguette an American Dreamer of another type? 9. On Huguette’s death certificate, her occupation was listed as “artist.” Beginning with W.A., consider what part creativity and imagination play in this story. Was W.A.’s imagination the source of his power? What did Huguette inherit from her father in the way of tastes or interests or capabilities? From her mother? Consider the words of the founder of Huguette’s prep school, Clara Spence, who urged her students:

I beg you to cultivate imagination, which means to develop your power of sympathy, and I entreat you to decide thoughtfully what makes a human being great in his time and in his station. The faculty of imagination is often lightly spoken of as of no real importance, often decried as mischievous, as in some ways the antithesis of practical sense, and yet it ranks with reason and conscience as one of the supreme characteristics by which man is distinguished from all other animals. . . . Sympathy, the great bond between human beings, is largely dependent on imagination— that is, upon the power of realizing the feelings and the circumstances of others so as to enable us to feel with and for them. Did Huguette follow those words? What role did imagination and sympathy play in her life? What role do they play in yours?

10. Did you like Huguette? Were there points in the book where you were frustrated by her and/or felt sympathy for her? By the end of the book, did you feel as if you knew her well? Did your view of her change throughout the book?

11. Many characters in Empty Mansions have moral dimensions of both good and bad. Do you believe W.A. was more good than bad? What about attorney Wally Bock? Accountant Irv Kamsler? Nurse Hadassah Peri? Personal assistant Chris Sattler? Dr. Henry Singman? Were there any characters who seemed to be simply good or rotten in their relationships with Huguette? Were you engaged or frustrated by the authors’ insistence on showing the good and bad in characters?

12. If Empty Mansions were made into a movie, what actors would you like to see in the major roles? What movie that you’ve seen should it be most similar to? Would you make it a psychological drama? An epic family saga of Western bonanza wealth? A Gilded Age study of manners and family relationships? What scenes would be the most delicious to write?

Abundantly Wealthy, But Not Living It Up ‘Empty Mansions,’ About the Heiress Huguette Clark

By JANET MASLIN SEPT. 4, 2013 NEW YORK TIMES The story of how the book “Empty Mansions” came to be, in the words of Bill Dedman, one of its two authors, begins with “an exercise in American aspiration.” And when Mr. Dedman, a journalist, embarked on that exercise, he could not have guessed how right that phrase would be. In 2009 he and his wife were looking for a house outside . Just for fun, Mr. Dedman Googled real estate listings in the astronomical range. He found a markdown in New Canaan, Conn., a house that had gone from $35 million to $24 million and had one very unusual feature, even more unusual than its room for drying draperies. The place had been unoccupied since it was purchased. In 1951.

Mr. Dedman located the house and coaxed forth its caretaker. This man had never met his employer of more than 20 years, Huguette Clark. But he had a newspaper clipping about the sale at auction of a $23.5 million Renoir painting that came from “the estate of Huguette Clark.” The caretaker was puzzled. Had Ms. Clark been dead all these years he worked for her?

Mr. Dedman had stumbled onto an amazing story of profligate wealth, one so wild that “American aspiration” doesn’t begin to describe its excesses. Ms. Clark was not dead at all, but she did not live in any of her immense dwellings, which included an estate atop a mesa in Santa Barbara, Calif., and three apartments, totaling more than 40 rooms, in a grand Fifth Avenue building. At 103, and in need of not much more medication than vitamin pills, she had long ago sequestered herself in a hospital room and had not been to any of her homes in more than 20 years. “Empty Mansions” is the self-explanatory title of the Huguette Clark story.

This book credits Paul Clark Newell Jr., a cousin to Ms. Clark, as its co-author. Unlike many other Clark family members, he knew Huguette, whodied in 2011 at 104, well enough to receive occasional phone calls from her, though she was too wily to give him her number. She was polite, lucid and even chatty, all of which undermine the idea that she was a crazy recluse living in miserable isolation. Far from it: her favorite late-18th-century French fable described the benefits of living unobtrusively as a cricket, rather than glamorously as a butterfly. She seems simply to have preferred to live quietly in tightly controlled surroundings, after spending her childhood and young adulthood as a jewel-bedecked heiress to a vast copper fortune.

A more reckless and sensationalized book than “Empty Mansions” would try to pigeonhole Ms. Clark as a poor little rich girl with a bad case of arrested development. (She loved the Smurfs and the Flintstones. She also took a serious interest in dolls, and commissioned the House of Dior to create doll clothes.) A more lurid account would also salivate over the conflicting claims to her estate. And authors less open-minded than these would draw easy comparisons between Ms. Clark’s later years and those of Howard Hughes. But she was a generous woman with many long-distance friendships; she just liked to keep them that way. The authors invoke “To Kill a Mockingbird”: they call her “a modern-day ‘Boo’ Radley, shut up inside by choice, safe from a world that can hurt.”

The early parts of this book tell an outsized tale of rags-to-riches prosperity, describing the ambition and ingenuity of W. A. Clark, the copper-mine millionaire and politician whose biography has tended to get lost in robber baron lore. But Clark was wealthy enough to be known as the Copper King, and one of the less notable things he did was to help create a railroad linking Salt Lake City with Los Angeles. He sold residential lots at a spot in Nevada that could be useful for railroad maintenance and refueling. The small town he created became .

Clark married twice and had children by both wives. Ms. Clark was the younger of two daughters from his second marriage. By the time she was born, in 1906, her father was in his 60s, had become a United States senator from despite a scandal involving his efforts to buy votes, and remained a study in extravagance. The now-vanished Clark homestead in New York City can be seen on the book’s cover, complete with gaudy turret.

Ms. Clark had the credentials of a debutante, but that was not the life she chose. She married briefly and mysteriously and wrote amorous letters to a French confidant, but her primary interests were closer to home. Devoted to her mother and sister (and greatly bereaved when she lost them), she had an affinity for art as both painter and collector. She also inherited her mother’s love of music and wherewithal to collect rare instruments. A Stradivarius violin with a wood-carved image of Joan of Arc was one of the prized possessions that made Ms. Clark, in her later years, a target for predators. The best parts of the book describe the unseemly efforts of trustees, hospital administrators, a private nurse who collected millions from her patient, and an accountant caught in an Internet sex sting to separate the heiress from her money.

The messy circumstances surrounding her estate may become much more public, as a group of Clark descendants (from W. A. Clark’s first marriage) prepare to challenge her will. (A settlement is possible, but court proceedings have been scheduled for this month.) They are made especially messy by Ms. Clark’s habit of bestowing extravagant gifts without understanding that gift taxes were due. The book illustrates how readily her largess, legal fees and tax debts reduced her fortune, though she seems to have remained canny about those seeking to exploit her.

The unsuccessful efforts of Beth Israel Medical Center to squeeze a major contribution from its most peculiar long-term patient are especially embarrassing. As the hospital’s president, Dr. Robert Newman, wrote in a memo to his fund-raising staff: “Madame, as you know, is the biggest bucks contributing potential we have ever had.” Dr. Newman also used the phrase “super-mega gift” to describe what he was hoping for.

The whopping gift didn’t happen. So something else did. When Beth Israel discovered that Ms. Clark’s bequest would be only $1 million, she was moved to a room next to a janitor’s closet. The photo illustrations in “Empty Mansions” show both the sweeping vista outside Ms. Clark’s Fifth Avenue windows and the third-floor view of an air-conditioning unit to which Beth Israel relegated her. The hospital says it moved her only because her old room required renovation.