The Foreign Service Journal, June 1968
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
LOS BOSTONIANS, YUCATÁN Y LOS PRIMEROS RUMBOS DE LA ARQUEOLOGÍA Americanista ESTADOUNIDENSE, 1875-1894 Historia Mexicana, Vol
Historia Mexicana ISSN: 0185-0172 [email protected] El Colegio de México, A.C. México PALACIOS, GUILLERMO LOS BOSTONIANS, YUCATÁN Y LOS PRIMEROS RUMBOS DE LA ARQUEOLOGÍA AMERiCANiSTA ESTADOUNIDENSE, 1875-1894 Historia Mexicana, vol. LXII, núm. 1, julio-septiembre, 2012, pp. 105-193 El Colegio de México, A.C. Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=60029081003 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto LOS BOSTONIANS, YUCATÁN Y LOS PRiMERoS RUMBoS dE lA ARQUEOLOGÍA AMERiCANiSTA ESTADOUNIDENSE, 1875-1894* guillermo Palacios El Colegio de México introducción ste trabajo se propone hacer una revisión de lo que se Eha escrito en torno de las expediciones arqueológicas a la península de Yucatán financiadas por fondos estado- unidenses entre mediados de la década de 1875 y 1894. El periodo comprende los años del inicio de la aventura ar- queológica de un grupo de bostonianos en Yucatán, y se encierra con la primera “derrota” de la empresa. El traba- jo no presenta informaciones nuevas ni levanta hipótesis muy originales, sino que trata de componer, con ayuda de una completa –aunque no exhaustiva– revisión de fuentes Fecha de recepción: 15 de agosto de 2011 Fecha de aceptación: 12 de septiembre de 2011 * Esta investigación se benefició de la competente colaboración de la maestra laura Rojas Hernández y de la licenciada Elena Simón Hernán- dez, así como del inestimable apoyo de Patricia Kervick, del Peabody Museum Archives, cuyos documentos se citan con su autorización, y de HMex, lxii: 1, 2012 105 106 gUillERMo PAlACioS primarias y una amplia recuperación de bibliografía espe- cializada, un mosaico –también formado por investigacio- nes de otros colegas, ninguna de las cuales, a mi ver, ofrece un panorama completo si bien todas contribuyen a lograr- lo. -
Chichen Itza Coordinates: 20°40ʹ58.44ʺN 88°34ʹ7.14ʺW from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
Chichen Itza Coordinates: 20°40ʹ58.44ʺN 88°34ʹ7.14ʺW From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Chichen Itza ( /tʃiːˈtʃɛn iːˈtsɑː/;[1] from Yucatec Pre-Hispanic City of Chichen-Itza* Maya: Chi'ch'èen Ìitsha',[2] "at the mouth of the well UNESCO World Heritage Site of the Itza") is a large pre-Columbian archaeological site built by the Maya civilization located in the northern center of the Yucatán Peninsula, in the Municipality of Tinúm, Yucatán state, present-day Mexico. Chichen Itza was a major focal point in the northern Maya lowlands from the Late Classic through the Terminal Classic and into the early portion of the Early Postclassic period. The site exhibits a multitude of architectural styles, from what is called “In the Mexican Origin” and reminiscent of styles seen in central Mexico to the Puuc style found among the Country Mexico Puuc Maya of the northern lowlands. The presence of Type Cultural central Mexican styles was once thought to have been Criteria i, ii, iii representative of direct migration or even conquest from central Mexico, but most contemporary Reference 483 (http://whc.unesco.org/en/list/483) interpretations view the presence of these non-Maya Region** Latin America and the Caribbean styles more as the result of cultural diffusion. Inscription history The ruins of Chichen Itza are federal property, and the Inscription 1988 (12th Session) site’s stewardship is maintained by Mexico’s Instituto * Name as inscribed on World Heritage List. Nacional de Antropología e Historia (National (http://whc.unesco.org/en/list) Institute of Anthropology and History, INAH). The ** Region as classified by UNESCO. -
Neolithic Society in Northern Greece: the Evidence of Ground Stone Artefacts
Neolithic society in Northern Greece: the evidence of ground stone artefacts Volume I Christina Tsoraki Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield October 2008 to (j3en ABSTRACT Analysis of ground stone technology from the Neolithic of Greece rarely goes beyond incomplete descriptive accounts to focus on the activities performed with these tools and the contexts of their use. Ground stone products are seen as mundane static objects devoid of meaning and lacking significance. The aim of this thesis is to move away from incomplete accounts of ground stone technology and static typologies. Drawing upon the concepts of the chaine operatoire and 'object biographies' this thesis investigates ground stone technology as a social practice focusing on the life-cycle of artefacts from raw material selection to final deposition. The underlying premise is that a contextual approach can contribute to understanding the ways in which the production, consumption and discard of ground stone artefacts were structured within different forms and scales of social practice and the manner in which these differences articulated different meanings and social understandings. The aims of the thesis were materialised through the study of the rich ground stone assemblage from the LN settlement of Makriyalos, Greece. The analysis of the chaine operatoire of the Makriyalos ground stone assemblage revealed diverse technological choices expressed throughout the cycle of production and use. Established traditions existed according to which specific materials were considered to be appropriate for the production of different objects. Furthermore, detailed analysis suggests that the resulting objects were far from mundane artefacts but were instead active media for expressing choices informed by cultural understandings of appropriateness. -
UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Cremation, Society, and Landscape in the North Aegean, 6000-700 BCE Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8588693d Author Kontonicolas, MaryAnn Emilia Publication Date 2018 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Cremation, Society, and Landscape in the North Aegean, 6000 – 700 BCE A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology by MaryAnn Kontonicolas 2018 © Copyright by MaryAnn Kontonicolas 2018 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Cremation, Society, and Landscape in the North Aegean, 6000 – 700 BCE by MaryAnn Kontonicolas Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology University of California, Los Angeles, 2018 Professor John K. Papadopoulos, Chair This research project examines the appearance and proliferation of some of the earliest cremation burials in Europe in the context of the prehistoric north Aegean. Using archaeological and osteological evidence from the region between the Pindos mountains and Evros river in northern Greece, this study examines the formation of death rituals, the role of landscape in the emergence of cemeteries, and expressions of social identities against the backdrop of diachronic change and synchronic variation. I draw on a rich and diverse record of mortuary practices to examine the co-existence of cremation and inhumation rites from the beginnings of farming in the Neolithic period -
Early Neolithic Sites in Greece Bevond the Thessalian Region
CHAPTER VII EARLY NEOLITHIC SITES IN GREECE BEVOND THE THESSALIAN REGION In the hist chapter we have seen that at other sites in settlements may be mentioned, without indicating Thessaiy people were living in much the same con- whether they were occupied during Early, Middle or ditions as at Sesklo. We were able to discem three Late Neolithic. Cave sites may easily be overlooked different types of settlement location. All three were in survey, often being difficult of access. Early situated on the boundary between two different topo- Neolithic sites have been recovered very rarely on graphic zones, but one group of settlements was the islands. Since those few settlements which have situated in low foothills near the plain, the second been found are always situated directly on the coast, group was situated on the boundary between a river we are led to believe that similar settlements have valley and terrace and the third group of settlements been drowned by the gradual rise in sealevel. was either on the shore of a lake or on the coast. In this chapter we will first investigate the regions There are some minor differences between the of Greece which surround Thessaiy, namely Mace groups which are largely due to slightly different donia, Epirus and Boeotia. Afterwards we will mo local conditions. During the period a certain regio- ve South to Attica and the Peloponnese. Finally we nalisni developed. which can be noted especially in will discuss some of the island sites. the most obvious material, the pottery. So far our discussion has been restricted to Early Neolithic settlements in Thessaiy, which are geo- vil. -
Recent Discoveries from Prehistoric Macedonia
RECENT DISCOVERIES FROM PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA AN INTERIM REPORT Immediately west of Thessaloniki and bordering upon the Thermaic Gulf lie the rich, alluvial plain and encompassing foothills which are the heart of Classical Macedonia (PI. IA). This lowland is ringed by mountain ranges, except towards the sea, and is drained by two important rivers, the Haliak- mon and the Axios (Vardar). Both the wood, mineral and agricultural wealth of the area and its strategic location on the important trade-routes at the head of the northern Aegean have made Macedonia and its port, Thes saloniki, much sought after from antiquity down to the present. This paper is concerned with the evidence for human activity in this region during pre historic times. Much of what is now known is the result of the assiduous attention given to reports of chance discoveries by the Ephor of Antiquities for Western Macedonia for the Greek Archaeological Service, Mr. Photios Petsas; a systematic survey of the area for prehistoric sites has added to our knowledge, and this is being continued. Excavation of a Neolithic settlement with both very early and late levels at the site of Nea Nikomedeia is suggesting a chron ological framework into which to place some of the otherwise undated archaeological material, and is providing an opportunity for archaeologists and natural scientists to work together to reconstruct the ecological setting and the economic activities of the prehistoric groups represented by the archaeological record.1 The results of the investigations thus far indicate set tlement of the area by primary Neolithic village-farming groups at a very early date and, to a much greater extent, by Late Neolithic farmers and traders; evidence of Palaeolifhic hunters and food-gatherers has also been found. -
Architecture, Culture, and Spirituality
Architecture, Culture, and Spirituality Edited by Thomas Barrie, Julio Bermudez, and Phillip James Tabb © Thomas Barrie, Julio Bermudez and Phillip James Tabb 2015 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the publisher. Thomas Barrie, Julio Bermudez and Phillip James Tabb have asserted their right under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the editors of this work. Published by Ashgate Publishing Limited Ashgate Publishing Company Wey Court East 110 Cherry Street Union Road Suite 3-1 Farnham Burlington, VT 05401-3818 Surrey, GU9 7PT USA England www.ashgate.com British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Architecture, culture, and spirituality / [edited] by Thomas Barrie, Julio Bermudez and Phillip James Tabb. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-4724-4171-3 (hardback) - ISBN 978-1-4724-4172-0 (ebook) - ISBN 978-1-4724-4173-7 (epub) I. Spirituality in architecture. 2. Architecture and society. I. Barrie, Thomas, editor. II. Bermudez, Julio Cesar, editor. III. Tabb, Phillip, editor. NA2540.A6125 2015 720.T08-dc23 2015011906 ISBN 9781472441713 (hbk) ISBN 9781472441720 (ebk - PDF) ISBN 978I47244I737 (ebk - ePUB) Printed in the United Kingdom by Henry Ling Limited, at -
Early Neolithic Settlement Patterns and Exchange Networks in the Aegean
reingruber.qxd 21/11/2011 11:11 Page 291 (Black plate) a l t e n Documenta Praehistorica XXXVIII (2011) Early Neolithic settlement patterns and exchange networks in the Aegean Agathe Reingruber The German Archaeological Institute (DAI), Eurasia Department, Berlin, DE [email protected] ABSTRACT – The Neolithisation process is one of the major issues under debate in Aegean archae- ology, since the description of the basal layers of Thessalian tell-settlements some fifty years ago. The pottery, figurines or stamps seemed to be of Anatolian origin, and were presumably brought to the region by colonists. The direct linking of the so-called ‘Neolithic Package’ with groups of people lea- ving Central Anatolia after the collapse of the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B resulted in the colonisation model of the Aegean. This view is not supported by results obtained from natural sciences such as archaeobotany, radiocarbon analyses, and neutron activation on obsidian. When theories of social networks are brought into the discussion, the picture that emerges becomes much more differentia- ted and complex. IZVLE∞EK – Proces neolitizacije predstavlja enega glavnih vpra∏anj v okviru razprav v egejski arheo- logiji vsaj od opisa temeljnih plasti naselbin tipa tell v Tesaliji pred 50 leti. Za keramiko, figurine in pe≠atnike se je zdelo, da izvirajo iz podro≠ja Anatolije, in so jih na podro≠je Tesalije prinesli ko- lonisti. Neposredno povezovanje t.i. ‘neolitskega paketa’ s skupino ljudi, ki je zapustila centralno Ana- tolijo po padcu kulture predkerami≠nega neolitika B, je postalo osnova za egejski kolonizacijski mo- del. Ta vidik pa ne podpirajo rezultati iz naravoslovja kot so arheobotanika, radiokarbonske anali- ze in nevronska aktivacijska analiza obsidiana. -
Y-Chromosome Models of Archaic Greek Colonization of the Western Mediterranean
The coming of the Greeks to Provence and Corsica: Y-chromosome models of archaic Greek colonization of the western Mediterranean. Roy King, Julie Dicristofaro, Anastasia Kouvatsi, Costas Triantaphyllidis, Walter Scheidel, Natalie Myres, Alice Lin, Alexandre Eissautier, Michael Mitchell, Didier Binder, et al. To cite this version: Roy King, Julie Dicristofaro, Anastasia Kouvatsi, Costas Triantaphyllidis, Walter Scheidel, et al.. The coming of the Greeks to Provence and Corsica: Y-chromosome models of archaic Greek colonization of the western Mediterranean.. BMC Evolutionary Biology, BioMed Central, 2011, 11 (1), pp.69. 10.1186/1471-2148-11-69. inserm-00617213 HAL Id: inserm-00617213 https://www.hal.inserm.fr/inserm-00617213 Submitted on 26 Aug 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. King et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011, 11:69 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/11/69 RESEARCHARTICLE Open Access The coming of the Greeks to Provence and Corsica: Y-chromosome models of archaic Greek colonization of the western Mediterranean Roy J King1, Julie DiCristofaro2, Anastasia Kouvatsi3, Costas Triantaphyllidis3, Walter Scheidel4, Natalie M Myres5, Alice A Lin1, Alexandre Eissautier2, Michael Mitchell6, Didier Binder7, Ornella Semino8, Andrea Novelletto9, Peter A Underhill1, Jacques Chiaroni2* Abstract Background: The process of Greek colonization of the central and western Mediterranean during the Archaic and Classical Eras has been understudied from the perspective of population genetics. -
EL DRAGADO DEL CENOTE SAGRADO DE CHICHÉN ITZÁ 1904-C
EL DRAGADO DEL CENOTE SAGRADO DE CHICHÉN ITZÁ 1904-c. 1914 Guillermo Palacios ste artículo es un relato del proceso de dragado del Ecenote sagrado de Chichén Itzá entre 1904 y una fecha incierta, situada hacia mediados de 1907, y sus derivaciones y consecuencias, que sólo se interrumpen en 1914. El draga- do fue dirigido y ejecutado por el cónsul de Estados Unidos en Progreso, Edward H. Thompson, protegido por el fun- cionario del gobierno mexicano encargado de “conservar” las ruinas, y financiado por el Peabody Museum de Harvard University, principal receptor de miles de piezas extraídas de sus profundidades y retiradas ilegalmente del país, con la connivencia de otras autoridades mexicanas de diversos rangos y niveles. Como recordarán los lectores interesados, se trata de un hecho que culmina la carrera “arqueológica” del agente del Peabody Museum estadounidense en Yuca- tán en su doble papel de excavador y representante oficial de su país en la Península. Fecha de recepción: 16 de febrero de 2016 Fecha de aceptación: 19 de julio de 2016 HMex, LXVII: 2, 2017 659 660 GUILLERMO palacios El texto continúa la narrativa de otros trabajos sobre el tema,1 y la lleva hasta el momento en que los conflictos armados, que serán subsumidos bajo el tópico de “revolu- ción mexicana”, aunados a los disturbios de toda naturale- za causados por la Gran Guerra, interrumpen por un largo periodo las aventuras arqueológicas estadounidenses en México, en particular en la llamada “área maya”. Al igual que en los trabajos citados, el interés del autor no está -
Excavations in the Franchthi Cave, 1969-1971. Part Ii.1
EXCAVATIONS IN THE FRANCHTHI CAVE, 1969-1971. PART II.1 (PLATES 45-53) T HE following represents the concluding installment of the progress report sum- marizing the results of the third and fourth seasons of excavation conducted by Indiana University and the University of Pennsylvania at Franchthi Cave in the Greek Argolid. As these lines were being written, preparations were well under way for a fifth major campaign to be carried out in the summer of 1973. The reader's attention should be drawn to the fact that this report again includes contributions by colleagues engaged in our project. Rosemary Payne (R. P.) of the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara contributed the following note on the bone implements, and Dr. J. L. Angel (J. L. A.) of the Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D. C., is responsible for the section dealing with the human skeletal remains. Dr. F. R. Matson of the Pennsylvania State University had intended to contribute an interpretation of analyses of selected potsherds from Franchthi, but interruptions in conducting the analyses have prevented his contribution from being included here; it may appear in a later issue of this journal. BONE TOOLS A good sample of bone tools has now been recovered from Franchthi Cave. Most are made on long bones, with a few on scapulae. Antler tools are surprisingly scarce (only six); there are a few boar's tusk ornaments. Of the 329 tools found so far, over two-thirds (239) are points, of which almost half fall into five distinct types (Pls. 45-48). Type 1 (P1. -
The Prehistory of Greece: C
The Prehistory of Greece: c. 10,000 – c. 1550 BC The Neolithic Age The ‘Neolithic Revolution’ took place around 10,000 BC probably as a result of the herding of horned beasts leading to their full domestication, then through the need to secure fodder to agriculture. By 6,500 BC farming developed in the Bosporus, spreading to Thessalonika and Macedonia, and then south into Greece. The earliest sight in Greece is in Thessaly at Sesklo near the Bay of Volos. These Neolithic farmers learnt how to make pottery, though without the wheel. They built cabins of brick on stone foundations. Their art comprises little clay figurines with exaggerated plumpness. Five such statuettes have been found at Nea Nikomedeia in a building that was possibly a shrine. It seems they worshipped the supernatural power that could give or withhold fertility as a goddess. They probably used a rotation method of cultivation – rotating grain crops with peas and beans. Their stone cabins evolved into mounds or “tells” which is similar to Western Asia. Crete was colonised by settlers from the Levant who brought with them pigs, sheep and cattle. They also made female figurines. Their dwellings were without fortifications and they usually inhabited inland caves occupying principally the western side of the island. The earliest settlement at Knosós, by radioactive carbon dating, is dated c. 5000 BC. The Early Helladic Period The Cyclades were settled around 4000 BC, and by 2750 BC the inhabitants were using copper daggers and spearheads, the first in Greece to do so. The beginning of the Aegean Bronze Age is usually dated around 2600 BC.