An Abstract of the Dissertation Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Abstract of the Dissertation Of AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Michael C. Russell for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Horticulture presented on May 23, 2013 Title: Habitat Management for Beneficial Insects on Willamette Valley Vegetable and Berry Farms. Abstract approved: ___________________________________________________________________ John G. Lambrinos Conservation biological control involves manipulating farm landscapes or management systems to enhance populations of beneficial predators of agricultural pests. Farmscaping is one aspect of conservation biological control where predators of important pests are identified, the availability on the farm landscape of resources and habitat components needed by the beneficials to complete their lifecycles is evaluated, and hedgerows, beetle banks, or other conservation plantings can be added to the landscape to provide the lacking resources. To be able to efficiently survey a farm landscape for the presence of resources that support beneficial predator populations there needs to be information on the resource availability with different habitats. This dissertation describes a series of investigations into determining the amount of resources available in particular habitat types, and how to create conservation plantings which provide these resources with minimal expense and impact on the farming system. The first investigation is into the floral resource availability to parasitoid wasps in cane berry production landscapes. A meta analysis was performed to estimate the effects of different species on longevity of and attraction to various flowers. This information was then used to evaluate the plant species found on Willamette valley cane berry farms and calculate the total floral resource availability of different habitats during different times of the year. Surveys identified particular habitats on the landscape, and different management regimes as having high floral resource availability relative to other habitats or management regimes. The second investigation focuses on the biology of a group of ground beetles that are common on Willamette valley vegetable farms. Pitfall trapping and soil core samples were used to determine the seasonal activity patterns of the carabids, and to identify which habitats they were using most. Sentinel prey cards were used to compare pitfall trap counts with the risk of predation of a potential prey item. Laboratory experiments identified differences in the feeding and activity of different species, and the changes over the season. The third investigation used soil cores to sample the over wintering arthropod predator populations in a variety of habitats on Willamette valley farms, and in plantings of native species on beetle banks in a common garden at the Hyslop research farm in Corvallis, Oregon. Grassy habitats were found to support the highest arthropod populations both on the farms and in the common garden. Some perennial forbs also had high arthropod numbers, while other perennial forbs and annual forbs had low numbers. Differences in the number of over wintering arthropods in different species were related with differences in the structure and composition of the vegetation. The information presented here can be used to assign value to different habitats based on the provision of specific resources required for beneficial predators to complete their life cycles. This will aid in rapid evaluations of farm landscapes based on aerial imagery interpretation or a quick tour. After initial predictions are made it is easier to conduct more in depth sampling to confirm whether the beneficials are in fact present and thriving. If there are resources that are in too short a supply the information provided here will help in designing conservation plantings to provide those resources. © Copyright by Michael C. Russell May 23, 2013 All Rights Reserved Habitat Management for Beneficial Insects on Willamette Valley Vegetable and Berry Farms by Michael C. Russell A DISSERTATION submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Presented May 23, 2013 Commencement June 2013 Doctor of Philosophy dissertation of Michael C. Russell Presented on May 23, 2013 APPROVED: ______________________________________________________________________ Major Professor, representing Horticulture ______________________________________________________________________ Head of the Department of Horticulture ______________________________________________________________________ Dean of the Graduate School I understand that my dissertation will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my dissertation to any reader upon request. ______________________________________________________________________ Michael C. Russell, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Gwendolyn Ellen, Elizabeth Records, and Jeremy Karby provided invaluable assistance with the fieldwork and labwork involved in the completion of this dissertation. Dr. John Lambrinos was the best Major advisor I could have wanted and provided the perfect mix of guidance, assistance, and freedom to follow my interests. CONTRIBUTION OF AUTHORS Dr. Mario Ambrosino made a significant contribution to the compilation of articles for the parasitoid wasp floral availability meta analysis. Elizabeth records provided the majority of the labor in the beetle activity trials and dissections. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction ……………………………………………………………… 1 A meta-analysis of physiological and behavioral responses of parasitoid wasps to flowers of individual plant species …………………………….... 11 Patterns of floral nectar availability for parasitoid wasps in cane berry production landscapes ………………………………………….…… 44 Seasonal activity and feeding patterns of Ground beetles (Carabidae: Coleoptera) in a western Oregon agricultural landscape …………………..….. 90 Vegetation characteristics associated with high densities of over wintering predatory beetles and spiders in western Oregon vegetable farm landscapes ………………………………………………………. 134 Conclusion ………………………………………………………………. 177 Bibliography ……………………………………………………………... 179 Appendix ………………………………………………………………. 193 Appendix A Plant communities of cane berry fields under different management systems ………………………………………………. 194 Appendix B Phenology, feeding habits, activity patterns, and fertility state of common ground beetles (Coleroptera: Carabidae) of agricultural areas in the Willamette valley of western Oregon ………………………. 219 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1 The estimated mean effects (log response ratio) of each plant species on longevity (left panel) and attraction (right panel) in parasitoid wasps. ... 41 2.2 The calculated effects (log response ratio = ln treatment mean / control mean) of each plant species that was only included in a single study on parasitoid wasp longevity and attraction. ………………………. 42 2.3 The calculated mean effect sizes [log response ratio = ln (treatment mean / control mean)] of the species within each plant family with tested species. ……………………………………………………… 43 3.1 Floral phenology of species on caneberry farm landscapes ………………. 74 3.2 Mean season long floral availability scores for fields in different habitat groups ………………………………………………………………. 77 3.3 The mean potential floral availability score for each habitat during each sample week ……………………………………………….…….. 78 3.4 The mean floral availability score over the season for habitat patches in different successional stages …………………….……..………….. 79 3.5 Mean floral availability score for fields under different inter row (cover crop or tillage) and irrigation (overhead or drip) management regimes .... 81 3.6 Abundance of flowers with and without potentially available nectar in cane berry fields of each management type over the four month growing season …………………….……………………………….. 82 3.7 A map showing the floral availability scores for each habitat patch on farm H during the last week of July ..…………………………….. 83 4.1 The mean number of beetles of each species caught per pitfall trap during each sampling month ……………..………………………. 121 4.2 The mean number of beetles of each size class caught per trap during each sample month ……………………………………………... 122 4.3 The mean number of ground beetles caught per trap in habitats dominated by different plant functional groups for each carabid species and for all carabids as a group (including Omus). ……………... 124 LIST OF FIGURES (Continued) Figure Page 4.4 The number of ground beetle adults collected from winter soil cores from habitats dominated by different plant growth forms ……….. 125 4.5 The mean number of fly pupae eaten per beetle over two days for species included in the feeding ……………………………………… 126 4.6 The relationship between mean voracity and mean adult length for the common large and mid-sized beetles ……………………………… 126 4.7 The relative activity density, voracity, and egg load of four ground beetle species over the year ……………………………………….……... 128 4.8 The number of pigweed seeds eaten as a proportion of all items eaten for each ground beetle species …..………………………………….. 129 4.9 The mean number of ground beetle larvae caught per pitfall trap. ……… 130 4.10 Bar graphs showing the trend for more sentinel prey items eaten when there are more ground beetles present ……………………... 132 4.11 The mean number of beetles caught per trap on the four farms ….….. 133 5.1 The back transformed mean log (abundance + 1) of three generalist predator groups in soil cores from habitats on the farm landscape ……………………………………………………... 166 5.2 Mean
Recommended publications
  • Field Notes in Support of a Revision of Hawaiian Carabidae
    Field Notes in Support of a Revision of Hawaiian Carabidae James K. Liebherr* Cornell University Ithaca, NY, U.S.A. * Curator (Ret.) Cornell University Insect Collection, and Professor Emeritus 23 August 2021 Field Notes in Support of a Revision of Hawaiian Carabidae © 2021 by James K. Liebherr is licensed under Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Cornell University Insect Collection John H. and Ann B. Comstock Hall Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853-2601 U.S.A. ii Table of Contents Foreword ……………………………………………………………….…………………………. iv 00.—Introduction …………………………………………………………………..………….. 1 01.—Kauaˋi; 9-22 March, 10-16 May 1991 ……..…………………………...….... 7 02.—Hawaiˋi Island; 23 March-5 April 1991 ..…………………………..…….… 21 03.—Haleakalā; 8-13 April 1991, 29 April–9 May 1991 …………….…….… 27 04.—Oˋahu; 20–23 April, 18 May 1991 ………………………..……….…..….…..41 05.—Molokaˋi; 24-27 April 1991 …………………………………….……..….………45 06.—West Maui, 11-15 May 1992; Molokaˋi, 15-16 May 1992 ...……… 50 07.—Maui Nui, 29 April-21 May 1993 (Lānaˋi, Molokaˋi, West Maui, Haleakalā) ……………….………………………………………………………………….…….61 08.—Oˋahu, 1-15 May 1995 .………………………………….……………………..…. 89 09.—Kauaˋi, 16-22 May 1995 ………………….………………..…………..………. 104 10.—Maui + Molokaˋi 20-31 May 1997 …..……………………………………... 114 11.—Hawaiˋi Island—1–6 June 1997 …..………………………..……………….. 134 12.—Hawaiˋi Island—9–17 October 1997 …..……………………….…….….. 138 13.—Haleakalā, Maui—30 April–15 May 1998 ….…………………………... 145 14.—Haleakalā and West Maui—15–23 May 2001 …….………….………. 167 15.—Hawaiˋi Island—23–27 May 2001 …………………..…………..…………. 179 16.—Haleakalā, Maui, 14–20 May 2003 …………………………………………. 184 17.—Hawaiˋi Island, 21–25 May 2003 ………………..………………………….. 192 18.—Lānaˋi, Molokaˋi, West Maui, 10–28 May 2004 …..……..….……….
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996
    Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 49, 71 p. (1997) RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1996 Part 2: Notes1 This is the second of 2 parts to the Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 1996 and contains the notes on Hawaiian species of protists, fungi, plants, and animals includ- ing new state and island records, range extensions, and other information. Larger, more comprehensive treatments and papers describing new taxa are treated in the first part of this Records [Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 48]. Foraminifera of Hawaii: Literature Survey THOMAS A. BURCH & BEATRICE L. BURCH (Research Associates in Zoology, Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, HI 96817, USA) The result of a compilation of a checklist of Foraminifera of the Hawaiian Islands is a list of 755 taxa reported in the literature below. The entire list is planned to be published as a Bishop Museum Technical Report. This list also includes other names that have been applied to Hawaiian foraminiferans. Loeblich & Tappan (1994) and Jones (1994) dis- agree about which names should be used; therefore, each is cross referenced to the other. Literature Cited Bagg, R.M., Jr. 1980. Foraminifera collected near the Hawaiian Islands by the Steamer Albatross in 1902. Proc. U.S. Natl. Mus. 34(1603): 113–73. Barker, R.W. 1960. Taxonomic notes on the species figured by H. B. Brady in his report on the Foraminifera dredged by HMS Challenger during the years 1873–1876. Soc. Econ. Paleontol. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 9, 239 p. Belford, D.J.
    [Show full text]
  • Winged Sharpshooter
    REPRODUCTIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY OF GONATOCERUS ASHMEADI, AN EGG PARASITOID OF THE GLASSY-WINGED SHARPSHOOTER Project leader: Cooperator: Mark Hoddle Leigh Pilkington Dept. of Entomology Dept. of Entomology University of California University of California Riverside, CA 92521 Riverside, CA 92521 Reporting period: The results reported here are from work conducted from April 2004 to October 2004. ABSTRACT The reproductive and developmental biology of Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault, a self-introduced parasitoid of the glassy- winged sharpshooter (GWSS) Homalodisca coagulata Say, was determined at five constant temperatures in the laboratory; 15; 20; 25; 30; and 33°C. Wasps at each experimental temperature were given, on average, between 10 and 15 GWSS eggs per day for its natural life for oviposition. At 30°C, immature G. ashmeadi sustained the highest mortality rates as adult emergence was lowest at this temperature. The largest proportion of female offspring was produced at 25°C and lifetime fecundity was greatest at 25°C. The development time was greatest at 15°C and lowest at 30°C. Mean adult longevity was inversely related to temperature with a maximum of approximately 30 days at 15°C to a minimum of approximately two days at 33°C. INTRODUCTION The mymarid wasp species Gonatocerus ashmeadi Girault, G. triguttatus Girault, G. morrilli Howard, and G. fasciatus Girault are the most common natural enemies associated with the insect pest Homalodisca coagulata in it’s home range of southeastern USA and northeastern Mexico (Triapitsyn and Phillips, 2000). The wasp G. ashmeadi is a self-introduced resident of California and most likely came into the state in parasitized Homalodisca coagulata eggs (Vickerman et al., 2004) and has established widely in association with H.
    [Show full text]
  • Naturalist April 2013 1082
    April 2013 Volume 138 Number 1082 Yorkshire Union The Naturalist Vol. 138 No. 1082 April 2013 Contents Page Editorial 1 John Newbould: President of the YNU 2012-2013 2 Aqua�c plants in Yorkshire canals R. Goulder 4 An interes�ng plant gall on Gorse Derek Parkinson 16 Andricus gemmeus – a new gall for Yorkshire Tom Higginbo�om 17 A provisional Vascular Plant Red Data List for VC63 ‐ an evalua�on of current status 18 G.T.D. Wilmore The Gledhow Valley Woods Nest Box Scheme Mar�n Calvert 31 Onset of Summer Plumage in Black‐headed Gulls at Doncaster Lakeside, based on 35 field observa�ons January to March 2012* Colin A. Howes and John A. Porter Notes on Sowerby’s Beaked Whale strandings on the Yorkshire coast* 38 D.E. Whi�aker Seals at Teesmouth: a historical review Colin A. Howes and Robert Woods 42 Rosemary Beetle Chrysolina americana ‐ a new beetle record for Mid‐west Yorkshire 49 G. Boyd Field Note ‐ Rhododendron lea�opper in VC64 Mark Darwell and John Bowers 50 Recording in VC65 July 2012 John Newbould, Adrian Norris and Bill Ely 52 Botanical Report for 2012 Phyl Abbo� 62 YNU Excursions 2013 70 Project: The Yorkshire Flat Hedgehog Survey Colin A. Howes 78 Project: Parasi�sm of Coleophora serratella Derek Parkinson 79 YNU Calendar April ‐ August 2013 80 Book review: p77 YNU No�ce: p79 An asterix* indicates a peer‐reviewed paper Front cover: Hound’s‐tongue Cynoglossum officinale, one of the rare na�ve plants proposed for VC63’s Red Data List of plants (see p21).
    [Show full text]
  • Diurnal and Nocturnal Lepidoptera of Buenaventura (Piñas-Ecuador) Lepidópteros Diurnos Y Nocturnos De La Reserva Buenaventura (Piñas –Ecuador)
    Volume 9 (1) Diurnal and nocturnal lepidoptera of Buenaventura (Piñas-Ecuador) Lepidópteros diurnos y nocturnos de la Reserva Buenaventura (Piñas –Ecuador) Sebastián Padrón Universidad del Azuay Escuela de Biología del Medio Ambiente [email protected] February 2006 Download at: http://www.lyonia.org/downloadPDF.php?pdfID=2.408.1 Diurnal and nocturnal lepidoptera of Buenaventura (Piñas-Ecuador) Resumen En un bosque húmedo tropical en el sur de Ecuador, dentro de un gradiente altitudinal de 600-1000m sobre el nivel del mar, se realizo un inventario de mariposas diurnas y nocturnas elaborando así una lista preliminar de especies. La región de investigación (La Reserva Buenaventura) está ubicada en la parte alta de la provincia del Oro cerca de la ciudad de Piñas, esta reserva presenta una gran diversidad de aves, especies vegetales e insectos. Las comunidades de mariposas diurnas y nocturnas fueron muestreadas durante los meses de Agosto y Septiembre del 2004, para lo cual se utilizo trampas aéreas, de cebo, e intercepción con red y de luz Vapor de Mercurio 250 watt. Las trampas aéreas, de cebo y de intercepción fueron efectuadas a lo largo de transectos definidos dentro de la reserva, estos fueron monitoreados cada dos días dentro de los 24 días de la investigación. La trampa de luz fue ubicada en la estación científica y esta se uso, por tres horas desde 18:30 hasta 21:30, durante 15 noches. Se pudo capturar 550 especimenes las cuales fueron conservadas, montadas e identificación. Se pudo clasificar 255 especies de lepidópteros de las cuales 60 pertenecen a mariposas diurnas y 195 a nocturnas.
    [Show full text]
  • B a N I S T E R I A
    B A N I S T E R I A A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF VIRGINIA ISSN 1066-0712 Published by the Virginia Natural History Society The Virginia Natural History Society (VNHS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the dissemination of scientific information on all aspects of natural history in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including botany, zoology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, geology, geography, and climatology. The society’s periodical Banisteria is a peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal. Submitted manuscripts are published individually immediately after acceptance. A single volume is compiled at the end of each year and published online. The Editor will consider manuscripts on any aspect of natural history in Virginia or neighboring states if the information concerns a species native to Virginia or if the topic is directly related to regional natural history (as defined above). Biographies and historical accounts of relevance to natural history in Virginia also are suitable for publication in Banisteria. Membership dues and inquiries about back issues should be directed to the Co-Treasurers, and correspondence regarding Banisteria to the Editor. For additional information regarding the VNHS, including other membership categories, annual meetings, field events, pdf copies of papers from past issues of Banisteria, and instructions for prospective authors visit http://virginianaturalhistorysociety.com/ Editorial Staff: Banisteria Editor Todd Fredericksen, Ferrum College 215 Ferrum Mountain Road Ferrum, Virginia 24088 Associate Editors Philip Coulling, Nature Camp Incorporated Clyde Kessler, Virginia Tech Nancy Moncrief, Virginia Museum of Natural History Karen Powers, Radford University Stephen Powers, Roanoke College C. L. Staines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Copy Editor Kal Ivanov, Virginia Museum of Natural History Copyright held by the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Assessment for the Reflexed Indiangrass Leafhopper (Flexamia Reflexa (Osborn and Ball))
    Conservation Assessment for the Reflexed Indiangrass Leafhopper (Flexamia reflexa (Osborn and Ball)) USDA Forest Service, Eastern Region October 18, 2005 James Bess OTIS Enterprises 13501 south 750 west Wanatah, Indiana 46390 This document is undergoing peer review, comments welcome This Conservation Assessment was prepared to compile the published and unpublished information on the subject taxon or community; or this document was prepared by another organization and provides information to serve as a Conservation Assessment for the Eastern Region of the Forest Service. It does not represent a management decision by the U.S. Forest Service. Though the best scientific information available was used and subject experts were consulted in preparation of this document, it is expected that new information will arise. In the spirit of continuous learning and adaptive management, if you have information that will assist in conserving the subject taxon, please contact the Eastern Region of the Forest Service - Threatened and Endangered Species Program at 310 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 580 Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53203. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................................ 1 NOMENCLATURE AND TAXONOMY ..................................................................................... 2 DESCRIPTION OF SPECIES.......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Introduced Parasitic Wasps Could Control Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter
    California Agriculture Volume 59, Number 4 2005 Page 223 Introduced parasitic wasps could control glassy-winged sharpshooter Leigh J. Pilkington Nicola A. Irvin Elizabeth A. Boyd Mark S. Hoddle Serguei V. Triapitsyn Bryan G. Carey Walker A. Jones David J.W. Morgan Copyright c 2005 by Regents of the University of California, unless otherwise noted. This article is part of the collected publications of California Agriculture. California Agriculture is archived by the eScholarship Repository of the California Digital Library. Abstract The glassy-winged sharpshooter (GWSS) is an introduced pest that spreads the bacterium Xylella fastidiosa, which causes a variety of diseases such as Pierce’s disease in grapevines and leaf scorch in oleanders. GWSS has been established in Southern California since about 1990 and has also successfully invaded French Polynesia, Hawaii and Easter Island. Researchers from UC, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the California Department of Food and Agriculture have introduced parasitic wasps for the biological control of GWSS. Four parasitoids from the southeastern United States have been released and appear to be establishing in Southern California. Parasitoids from Argentina are also being evaluated in quarantine but have not yet been released. Keywords: glassy-winged sharpshooter, Xylella fastidiosa, biological control, Pierce’s disease, oleander leaf scorch, Mymaridae, parasitoids, Homalodisca coagulata, Gonatocerus Suggested Citation: Leigh J. Pilkington, Nicola A. Irvin, Elizabeth A. Boyd, Mark S. Hoddle, Serguei V. Triapitsyn, Bryan G. Carey, Walker A. Jones, and David J.W. Morgan (2005) “Introduced parasitic wasps could control glassy-winged sharpshooter”, California Agriculture: Vol. 59: No. 4, Page 223. http://repositories.cdlib.org/anrcs/californiaagriculture/v59/n4/p223 REVIEW ARTICLE ▼ Introduced parasitic wasps could control glassy-winged sharpshooter Leigh J.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera: Mymaridae)
    654 Florida Entomologist 85(4) December 2002 A NEW DISTRIBUTION AND HOST RECORD FOR GONATOCERUS TRIGUTTATUS IN FLORIDA, WITH NOTES ON ACMOPOLYNEMA SEMA (HYMENOPTERA: MYMARIDAE) SERGUEI V. TRIAPITSYN1, MARK S. HODDLE1 AND DAVID J. W. MORGAN2 1Department of Entomology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521 2Pierce’s Disease Control Program, California Department of Food and Agriculture, Mount Rubidoux Field Station, 4500 Glenwood Drive, Riverside, CA 92501 Triapitsyn et al. (1998) reported results of the H. coagulata decreases from north-central Flor- 1997 survey of egg parasitoids of the glassy- ida southward (Timmer et al. 1982), although it is winged sharpshooter, Homalodisca coagulata known in southern Florida as far as Homestead (Say) (Homoptera: Cicadellidae), in northern (Turner & Pollard 1959). Florida. As part of an on-going classical biological Gonatocerus triguttatus has not been known control program against H. coagulata in Califor- previously from Florida and O. nigricans is a new nia, two of the authors conducted a survey of egg host record for this parasitoid. Before our discov- parasitoids of proconiine sharpshooters (Cicadel- ery, the only known record of an egg parasitoid of lidae: Cicadellinae: Proconiini) throughout Flor- O. nigricans was by Turner & Pollard (1959) who ida in August 2001 (Triapitsyn & Hoddle 2001). reported a Gonatocerus sp. (as Lymaenon sp.) in Among several species in the families Mymaridae Plant City, Florida, from eggs of Oncometopia un- and Trichogrammatidae (both Hymenoptera) data (Fabricius), that is an obvious misidentifica- that were collected (Triapitsyn & Hoddle 2001), tion of O. nigricans following Young (1968). there were two mymarid species on which the Material Examined. USA, Florida, Orange Co., previously unknown information is given below.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: a Compilation and Review
    Insects of the Idaho National Laboratory: A Compilation and Review Nancy Hampton Abstract—Large tracts of important sagebrush (Artemisia L.) Major portions of the INL have been burned by wildfires habitat in southeastern Idaho, including thousands of acres at the over the past several years, and restoration and recovery of Idaho National Laboratory (INL), continue to be lost and degraded sagebrush habitat are current topics of investigation (Ander- through wildland fire and other disturbances. The roles of most son and Patrick 2000; Blew 2000). Most restoration projects, insects in sagebrush ecosystems are not well understood, and the including those at the INL, are focused on the reestablish- effects of habitat loss and alteration on their populations and ment of vegetation communities (Anderson and Shumar communities have not been well studied. Although a comprehen- 1989; Williams 1997). Insects also have important roles in sive survey of insects at the INL has not been performed, smaller restored communities (Williams 1997) and show promise as scale studies have been concentrated in sagebrush and associated indicators of restoration success in shrub-steppe (Karr and communities at the site. Here, I compile a taxonomic inventory of Kimberling 2003; Kimberling and others 2001) and other insects identified in these studies. The baseline inventory of more habitats (Jansen 1997; Williams 1997). than 1,240 species, representing 747 genera in 212 families, can be The purpose of this paper is to present a taxonomic list of used to build models of insect diversity in natural and restored insects identified by researchers studying cold desert com- sagebrush habitats. munities at the INL.
    [Show full text]
  • Sovraccoperta Fauna Inglese Giusta, Page 1 @ Normalize
    Comitato Scientifico per la Fauna d’Italia CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA FAUNA THE ITALIAN AND DISTRIBUTION OF CHECKLIST 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species and inland water 10,000 terrestrial CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species ISBNISBN 88-89230-09-688-89230- 09- 6 Ministero dell’Ambiente 9 778888988889 230091230091 e della Tutela del Territorio e del Mare CH © Copyright 2006 - Comune di Verona ISSN 0392-0097 ISBN 88-89230-09-6 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of the publishers and of the Authors. Direttore Responsabile Alessandra Aspes CHECKLIST AND DISTRIBUTION OF THE ITALIAN FAUNA 10,000 terrestrial and inland water species Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona - 2. Serie Sezione Scienze della Vita 17 - 2006 PROMOTING AGENCIES Italian Ministry for Environment and Territory and Sea, Nature Protection Directorate Civic Museum of Natural History of Verona Scientifi c Committee for the Fauna of Italy Calabria University, Department of Ecology EDITORIAL BOARD Aldo Cosentino Alessandro La Posta Augusto Vigna Taglianti Alessandra Aspes Leonardo Latella SCIENTIFIC BOARD Marco Bologna Pietro Brandmayr Eugenio Dupré Alessandro La Posta Leonardo Latella Alessandro Minelli Sandro Ruffo Fabio Stoch Augusto Vigna Taglianti Marzio Zapparoli EDITORS Sandro Ruffo Fabio Stoch DESIGN Riccardo Ricci LAYOUT Riccardo Ricci Zeno Guarienti EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Elisa Giacometti TRANSLATORS Maria Cristina Bruno (1-72, 239-307) Daniel Whitmore (73-238) VOLUME CITATION: Ruffo S., Stoch F.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Arthropod Natural Enemies in Broccoli with Relay Strip-Cropping
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Daniel M. McGrath for the degree of Doctor of Philosophyin Entomology presented on February 15, 2000. Title: Conservation ofArthropod Natural Enemies in Broccoli with Relay Strip-Cropping Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Relay strip-cropping combines two vegetation management tactics,under- sowing and strip-management. In this study conductedfrom 1994 though 1997, a cover crop seed-mixture containing oats (Avena sativa L.var. "Monida"), common vetch ( Vicia sativa L.), red clover (Tr4foliumpratense L.), annual ryegrass (Lolium multflorum Lam.), and buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentumMoench) was broadcast over established broccoli (Brassica oleracea L.) 32days after planting. The broccoli was planted, under-sown, and harvestedin sections alternated with strips of cover crop. Thecover crop relay provided tillage and pesticide refuges for beneficial insects without taking landout of broccoli production. Relay strip- cropping increased the abundance and diversity of groundbeetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae), spiders (Araneae), harvestmen (Opiliones: Phalangiidae),lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), and damsel bugs (Heteroptera: Nabidae)in the cropping system; however, this did not always result inincreased natural enemies in the broccoli. Arthropod species varied significantly in theirpropensity to leave the non-crop vegetation andmove into the broccoli. Movement of the lady beetle Coccinella septempunctata L. from thecover crop strips into the broccoli may have depressed aphid populations in 1996. Thenon-crop vegetation may have served as a sink rather than a source for Nabis species and appeared to reduce their density in the broccoli growing nearby. Therewas no evidence that background vegetation surrounding the broccoli reduced colonization by winged aphids.The density of the cabbage flea beetle Phyllotreta crucferae Goezewas lower in the broccoli relay compared with the clean-tilled broccoli.
    [Show full text]