DOCSLIB.ORG

DES: Recent Cosmology Results

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DES: Recent Cosmology Results DES: Recent Cosmology Results DES Overview SE TRUTH == WF EDI Initiatives DES Papers Milky Way Satellites and Dark Matter Physics DES Cosmology Overview Y3 Weak Lensing and Large-Scale Structure Results COADD TRUTH == 10x WF Y6 Data for Cosmology, DR2 Updated Analysis Timeline Tom Diehl & Rich Kron @ PAC June 10, 2021 DEEPEST > 100x WF Dark Energy Survey Collaboration Started in 2003, DES is an International Collaboration ~700 people with diverse scientific interests. ● DECam: The 570 Megapixel camera for the Blanco 4m telescope in Chile. ● Survey Observations 2013-2019 (Y3 2013-16). ● Wide field: 5000 sq. deg. in 5 bands. ~23 magnitude. ● 27 sq. deg. 5-yr SNIa survey Dark Energy Survey Collaboration C.M. May 17-21, 2021 Focused on Y6 Plans (especially for Cosmology Key Projects) & EDI/EPO. The Collaboration was enthusiastic and well-prepared, and looking forward to meeting in-person (hopefully) next time. Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Initiatives ● Currently engaged with the NOVA Collective (HOME - The Nova Collective), ○ We recently completed a climate survey. We’ll get the results soon. ● Mentorship Program ○ Volunteer Mentors. 25 Mentor/Mentee pairs. A dedicated Mentorship Coordinator. ● Adjustments to DES Collaboration written policies so that engagement with underrepresented people in STEM is encouraged ● Focus at Collaboration Meeting ○ Plenary Speaker from outside DES ○ EDI Parallel Sessions: Connecting with minority-serving institutions, Focusing EPO efforts on inclusion, Giving Credit in DES ○ EDI One-slides at the beginning of every Plenary session 91 DES PH.D’s DES Publications Update (so far) https://dbweb8.fnal.gov:8443/DESPub/app/PB/pub/pbpublished Through May 25, 2021, DES has 347 refereed science papers (not counting pre-data technical papers) with 14,700+ citations. Some of the recent papers (before May 25): Instrumental: “A Machine Learning Approach to the Detection of Ghosting and Scattered Light Artifacts in Dark Energy Survey Images”, “Reducing ground-based astrometric errors with Gaia and Gaussian processes” will both be useful to LSST Solar System: “Testing the isotropy of the Dark Energy Survey's extreme trans-Neptunian objects” SN1ae: “OzDES multifibre spectroscopy for the Dark Energy Survey: Results and implications for future surveys”, “The Effect of Environment on Type Ia Supernovae in the Dark Energy Survey Three-Year Cosmological Sample”, “The Dark Energy Survey Supernova Program: Modelling selection efficiency and observed core collapse supernova contamination”, “Rates and delay times of type Ia supernovae in the Dark Energy Survey” Galaxy Clusters: “Is diffuse intracluster light a good tracer of the galaxy cluster matter distribution?”, “ * Masses: Weak Lensing Calibration of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 redMaPPer Clusters using Stellar Masses”, “The WaZP galaxy cluster sample of the Dark Energy Survey Year 1” Weak Lensing: “Galaxy Clustering in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Real Space Results” Galaxy Clusters + WL: “Combination of cluster number counts and two-point correlations: Validation on Mock Dark Energy Survey”, “Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances, Weak Lensing, and Galaxy Correlations” Galaxy Clusters + External Data: “Cosmological Constraints from DES Y1 Cluster Abundances and SPT Multi-wavelength data”, “Probing galaxy evolution in massive clusters using ACT and DES: splashback as a cosmic clock”, “The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: A Catalog of > 4000 Sunyaev- Zel'dovich Galaxy Clusters” Modified Gravity: “Probing gravity with the DES-CMASS sample and BOSS spectroscopy”, “Galaxy-galaxy lensing with the DES-CMASS catalogue: measurement and constraints on the galaxy-matter cross-correlation” Optical + GW: “Constraints on the Physical Properties of S190814bv through Simulations based on DECam Follow-up Observations by DES” Dark Matter: “Milky Way Satellite Census. III. Constraints on Dark Matter Properties from Observations of Milky Way Satellite Galaxies”, “Constraints on Decaying Dark Matter with DES-Y1 and external data” . Galaxy Evolution: “Galaxy Morphological Classification Catalogue of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data with Convolutional Neural Networks” 6 Current Standard Cosmological model: ΛCDM Flat Universe with Dark Energy in the form of a cosmological constant Λ + Cold Dark Matter. It assumes General Relativity. ΛCDM became the standard model following observations from Type Ia Supernovae and the Cosmic Microwave Background. 7 Missing Satellites Problem & Known MW satellites vs year Dark Matter Physics DECam A long-time controversy: DM halo models Distribution of MW satellite masses predict hundreds of captured “satellite” enables model-dependent constraints galaxies for the Milky Way. DES data and on Dark Matter properties. i.e. DM must selection function vs. magnitude (mass be massive. proxy) shows that there are! Mass v. Mixing angle Absolute Magnitude Drlica-Wagner et al. ApJ 893, 1 (2020) Nadler et al. PRL 126, 091101 (2021) Testing ΛCDM: Is the late time clustering compatible with the ΛCDM prediction assuming initial conditions from the CMB? Spheres with radius 8 Mpc/h As: Amplitude of primordial σ8: Amplitude of mass scalar density fluctuations. fluctuations today, at 9 distance 8 Mpc/h Y3 Spectr. SNIa + Y1 DES: Cosmology Y1 3x2pt WL 7 Ways DES, PRL 122, 171301 (2019) Growth rate of structure and Expansion History: Weak Gravitational Lensing, Galaxy Clustering, & Galaxy Cluster Abundance Expansion History: BAO (standard rulers), DES, PRD 102, 023509 (2020) SNIa (standard candles), Gravitational Wave Follow up (standard sirens), Strongly-Lensed Palmese et al. ApJL 900, L33 (2020) Time varying SL quasar Transients. H0 = 74.2+2.7-3.0 Standard km/s/Mpc Y1 Combo Sirens To et al. arxiv:20100.01138 10 Shahib et al., MNRAS 494, 6072 (2020) New Results from DES: “Y3 3x2pt WL” Weak Gravitational Lensing: Sources and Lenses Galaxies trace the Light from distant galaxies underlying dark matter passes the foreground structure : they are structures and acquires observed to be spatially coherent distortions : they clustered. We construct a are observe to be lensed. power spectrum, or real- We correlate the lensing space correlation function of sources by the of the positions of foreground objects in (foreground) lens galaxies redshift / redshift bins (position- in redshift bins (position- distance shear). position). Image plane We also measure the correlation of the shapes Cosmic Shear : shape-shape (shear-shear) of source galaxy pairs as a Galaxy Clustering : position-position 3x2pt function of angular radius 2x2pt and redshift (shear-shear). Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing : position-shear 11 Y3 “3x2pt” Methodology: Pixels to Cosmology Webinar from May 27, 2021 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8aHbLMUOwLc LCDM —— WL+LSS —— Redshifts —— Shapes —— Clustering — Simulations —— Theory —— Results 12 Y3 WL 3x2-pt “29” Papers in https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ 1. “Blinding Multi-probe Cosmological Experiments” J. Muir, G. M. Bernstein, D. Huterer et al., arXiv: 1911.05929, MNRAS 494 (2020) 4454 2. “Photometric Data Set for Cosmology”, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, K. Bechtol, M. Carrasco Kind et al., arXiv:2011.03407, ApJS 254 (2021) 24 3. “Weak Lensing Shape Catalogue”, M. Gatti, E. Sheldon, A. Amon et al., arXiv:2011.03408, MNRAS 504 (2021) 4312 4. “Point Spread Function Modelling”, M. Jarvis, G. M. Bernstein, A. Amon et al., arXiv:2011.03409, MNRAS 501 (2021) 1282 5. “Measuring the Survey Transfer Function with Balrog”, S. Everett, B. Yanny, N. Kuropatkin et al., arXiv:2012.12825 6. “Deep Field Optical + Near-Infrared Images and Catalogue”, W. Hartley, A. Choi, A. Amon et al., arXiv:2012.12824 7. “Blending Shear and Redshift Biases in Image Simulations”, N. MacCrann, M. R. Becker, J. McCullough et al., arXiv:2012.08567 8. “Redshift Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Galaxies”, J. Myles, A. Alarcon, A. Amon et al., arXiv:2012.08566 9. “Redshift Calibration of the MagLim Lens Sample using Self-Organizing Maps and Clustering Redshifts”, G. Giannini et al., in prep. 10. “Clustering Redshifts – Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions with redMaGiC and BOSS/eBOSS”, M. Gatti, G. Giannini, et al., arXiv:2012.08569 11. “Calibration of Lens Sample Redshift Distributions using Clustering Redshifts with BOSS/eBOSS”, R. Cawthon et al. arXiv:2012.12826 12. “Phenotypic Redshifts with SOMs: a Novel Method to Characterize Redshift Distributions of Source Galaxies for Weak Lensing Analysis” R. Buchs, C.Davis, D. Gruen et al. MNRAS 489 (2019) 820 13. “Marginalising over Redshift Distribution Uncertainty in Weak Lensing Experiments”, J. Cordero, I. Harrison et al., in prep. 14. “Exploiting Small-Scale Information using Lensing Ratios”, C. Sánchez, J. Prat et al., in prep. 15. “Cosmology from Combined Galaxy Clustering and Lensing - Validation on Cosmological Simulations”, J. de Rose et al., in prep. 16. “Unbiased fast sampling of cosmological posterior distributions”, P. Lemos, R. Rollins, N. Weaverdyck, A. Ferte, A. Liddle et al., in prep. 17. “Assessing Tension Metrics with DES and Planck Data”, P. Lemos, M. Raveri, A. Campos et al., arXiv:2012.09554 18. “Dark Energy Survey Internal Consistency Tests of the Joint Cosmological Probe Analysis with Posterior Predictive Distributions”, C. Doux, E. Baxter, P. Lemos et al. MNRAS 503 (2021) 2688 19. “Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit”, O. Friedrich, F. Andrade-Oliveira,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report from the Dark Energy Task Force (DETF)
    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Fermilab Particle Astrophysics Center P.O.Box 500 - MS209 Batavia, Il l i noi s • 60510 June 6, 2006 Dr. Garth Illingworth Chair, Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Dr. Mel Shochet Chair, High Energy Physics Advisory Panel Dear Garth, Dear Mel, I am pleased to transmit to you the report of the Dark Energy Task Force. The report is a comprehensive study of the dark energy issue, perhaps the most compelling of all outstanding problems in physical science. In the Report, we outline the crucial need for a vigorous program to explore dark energy as fully as possible since it challenges our understanding of fundamental physical laws and the nature of the cosmos. We recommend that program elements include 1. Prompt critical evaluation of the benefits, costs, and risks of proposed long-term projects. 2. Commitment to a program combining observational techniques from one or more of these projects that will lead to a dramatic improvement in our understanding of dark energy. (A quantitative measure for that improvement is presented in the report.) 3. Immediately expanded support for long-term projects judged to be the most promising components of the long-term program. 4. Expanded support for ancillary measurements required for the long-term program and for projects that will improve our understanding and reduction of the dominant systematic measurement errors. 5. An immediate start for nearer term projects designed to advance our knowledge of dark energy and to develop the observational and analytical techniques that will be needed for the long-term program. Sincerely yours, on behalf of the Dark Energy Task Force, Edward Kolb Director, Particle Astrophysics Center Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Professor of Astronomy and Astrophysics The University of Chicago REPORT OF THE DARK ENERGY TASK FORCE Dark energy appears to be the dominant component of the physical Universe, yet there is no persuasive theoretical explanation for its existence or magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Energy and CMB
    Dark Energy and CMB Conveners: S. Dodelson and K. Honscheid Topical Conveners: K. Abazajian, J. Carlstrom, D. Huterer, B. Jain, A. Kim, D. Kirkby, A. Lee, N. Padmanabhan, J. Rhodes, D. Weinberg Abstract The American Physical Society's Division of Particles and Fields initiated a long-term planning exercise over 2012-13, with the goal of developing the community's long term aspirations. The sub-group \Dark Energy and CMB" prepared a series of papers explaining and highlighting the physics that will be studied with large galaxy surveys and cosmic microwave background experiments. This paper summarizes the findings of the other papers, all of which have been submitted jointly to the arXiv. arXiv:1309.5386v2 [astro-ph.CO] 24 Sep 2013 2 1 Cosmology and New Physics Maps of the Universe when it was 400,000 years old from observations of the cosmic microwave background and over the last ten billion years from galaxy surveys point to a compelling cosmological model. This model requires a very early epoch of accelerated expansion, inflation, during which the seeds of structure were planted via quantum mechanical fluctuations. These seeds began to grow via gravitational instability during the epoch in which dark matter dominated the energy density of the universe, transforming small perturbations laid down during inflation into nonlinear structures such as million light-year sized clusters, galaxies, stars, planets, and people. Over the past few billion years, we have entered a new phase, during which the expansion of the Universe is accelerating presumably driven by yet another substance, dark energy. Cosmologists have historically turned to fundamental physics to understand the early Universe, successfully explaining phenomena as diverse as the formation of the light elements, the process of electron-positron annihilation, and the production of cosmic neutrinos.
    [Show full text]
  • High Redshift Quasar Hunting with the Dark Energy Survey
    High Redshift Quasar Hunting with the Dark Energy Survey Quasars in the Epoch of Reionisation Sophie Reed Supervisors: Richard McMahon, Manda Banerji 1 Why? ★ Theories of black hole formation and evolution z = 6 - 15 z = 2 WORDS Epoch of peak of galaxy Reionization and quasar ★ Metal abundances in the early universe activity ★ Gas distribution and reionisationv z = 20 - 30 z = 6 - 8 Start of z = 1100 first stars Reionization matter-radiation “Population III” decoupling (CMB) 2 Quasar Spectrum at z ~ 6 Spectrum of a z = 5.86 quasar from Venemans et al 2007 Continuum break across rest frame Lyman-alpha (λrest = 121.6nm) gives distinctive colours 3 Quasar Spectrum at z ~ 6 480 nm 640 nm 780 nm 920 nm 990 nm 1252 nm 2147 nm 4 The Dark Energy Survey (DES) First Light September 2012 Very large area when completed: ~5000 deg2, currently have ~2000 deg2 Deep imaging: 10 σ limits for i and z are AB = 23.4 and AB = 23.2 Sophisticated camera, DECam Credit: DES Collaboration 5 DECam Mosaic of 62 2k by 4k CCDs (0.27” pixels) Multi waveband imaging: Visible (400 nm) to Near IR (1050 nm), g, r, i, z and Y bands covered Much more sensitive to red light than SDSS Credit: DES Collaboration 6 DES - SDSS Comparison SDSS was most sensitive to bluer light in the r band DES is most sensitive to redder light in the z band u g r i z Y 7 The VISTA Hemisphere Survey (VHS) Will cover 10,000 deg2 in the infrared when completed VHS-DES (J, H and K) overlaps DES and is deeper VHS-ATLAS (Y, J, H and K) is a shallower survey 8 Currently Known Objects Lots of quasars known
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration
    DES-2019-0479 FERMILAB-PUB-21-250-AE Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration A. Amon,1, ∗ D. Gruen,2, 1, 3 M. A. Troxel,4 N. MacCrann,5 S. Dodelson,6 A. Choi,7 C. Doux,8 L. F. Secco,8, 9 S. Samuroff,6 E. Krause,10 J. Cordero,11 J. Myles,2, 1, 3 J. DeRose,12 R. H. Wechsler,1, 2, 3 M. Gatti,8 A. Navarro-Alsina,13, 14 G. M. Bernstein,8 B. Jain,8 J. Blazek,7, 15 A. Alarcon,16 A. Ferté,17 P. Lemos,18, 19 M. Raveri,8 A. Campos,6 J. Prat,20 C. Sánchez,8 M. Jarvis,8 O. Alves,21, 22, 14 F. Andrade-Oliveira,22, 14 E. Baxter,23 K. Bechtol,24 M. R. Becker,16 S. L. Bridle,11 H. Camacho,22, 14 A. Carnero Rosell,25, 14, 26 M. Carrasco Kind,27, 28 R. Cawthon,24 C. Chang,20, 9 R. Chen,4 P. Chintalapati,29 M. Crocce,30, 31 C. Davis,1 H. T. Diehl,29 A. Drlica-Wagner,20, 29, 9 K. Eckert,8 T. F. Eifler,10, 17 J. Elvin-Poole,7, 32 S. Everett,33 X. Fang,10 P. Fosalba,30, 31 O. Friedrich,34 E. Gaztanaga,30, 31 G. Giannini,35 R. A. Gruendl,27, 28 I. Harrison,36, 11 W. G. Hartley,37 K. Herner,29 H. Huang,38 E. M. Huff,17 D. Huterer,21 N. Kuropatkin,29 P. Leget,1 A. R. Liddle,39, 40, 41 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Cosmic Visions Dark Energy: Science
    Cosmic Visions Dark Energy: Science Scott Dodelson, Katrin Heitmann, Chris Hirata, Klaus Honscheid, Aaron Roodman, UroˇsSeljak, Anˇze Slosar, Mark Trodden Executive Summary Cosmic surveys provide crucial information about high energy physics including strong evidence for dark energy, dark matter, and inflation. Ongoing and upcoming surveys will start to identify the underlying physics of these new phenomena, including tight constraints on the equation of state of dark energy, the viability of modified gravity, the existence of extra light species, the masses of the neutrinos, and the potential of the field that drove inflation. Even after the Stage IV experiments, DESI and LSST, complete their surveys, there will still be much information left in the sky. This additional information will enable us to understand the physics underlying the dark universe at an even deeper level and, in case Stage IV surveys find hints for physics beyond the current Standard Model of Cosmology, to revolutionize our current view of the universe. There are many ideas for how best to supplement and aid DESI and LSST in order to access some of this remaining information and how surveys beyond Stage IV can fully exploit this regime. These ideas flow to potential projects that could start construction in the 2020's. arXiv:1604.07626v1 [astro-ph.CO] 26 Apr 2016 2 1 Overview This document begins with a description of the scientific goals of the cosmic surveys program in x2 and then x3 presents the evidence that, even after the surveys currently planned for the 2020's, much of the relevant information in the sky will remain to be mined.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:0910.5224V1 [Astro-Ph.CO] 27 Oct 2009
    Baryon Acoustic Oscillations Bruce A. Bassett 1,2,a & Ren´ee Hlozek1,2,3,b 1 South African Astronomical Observatory, Observatory, Cape Town, South Africa 7700 2 Department of Mathematics and Applied Mathematics, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Cape Town, South Africa 7700 3 Department of Astrophysics, University of Oxford Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3RH, UK a [email protected] b [email protected] Abstract Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) are frozen relics left over from the pre-decoupling universe. They are the standard rulers of choice for 21st century cosmology, provid- ing distance estimates that are, for the first time, firmly rooted in well-understood, linear physics. This review synthesises current understanding regarding all aspects of BAO cosmology, from the theoretical and statistical to the observational, and includes a map of the future landscape of BAO surveys, both spectroscopic and photometric . † 1.1 Introduction Whilst often phrased in terms of the quest to uncover the nature of dark energy, a more general rubric for cosmology in the early part of the 21st century might also be the “the distance revolution”. With new knowledge of the extra-galactic distance arXiv:0910.5224v1 [astro-ph.CO] 27 Oct 2009 ladder we are, for the first time, beginning to accurately probe the cosmic expansion history beyond the local universe. While standard candles – most notably Type Ia supernovae (SNIa) – kicked off the revolution, it is clear that Statistical Standard Rulers, and the Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) in particular, will play an increasingly important role. In this review we cover the theoretical, observational and statistical aspects of the BAO as standard rulers and examine the impact BAO will have on our understand- † This review is an extended version of a chapter in the book Dark Energy Ed.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation
    DES-2020-0554 FERMILAB-PUB-21-240-AE Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Multi-Probe Modeling Strategy and Validation E. Krause,1, ∗ X. Fang,1 S. Pandey,2 L. F. Secco,2, 3 O. Alves,4, 5, 6 H. Huang,7 J. Blazek,8, 9 J. Prat,10, 3 J. Zuntz,11 T. F. Eifler,1 N. MacCrann,12 J. DeRose,13 M. Crocce,14, 15 A. Porredon,16, 17 B. Jain,2 M. A. Troxel,18 S. Dodelson,19, 20 D. Huterer,4 A. R. Liddle,11, 21, 22 C. D. Leonard,23 A. Amon,24 A. Chen,4 J. Elvin-Poole,16, 17 A. Fert´e,25 J. Muir,24 Y. Park,26 S. Samuroff,19 A. Brandao-Souza,27, 6 N. Weaverdyck,4 G. Zacharegkas,3 R. Rosenfeld,28, 6 A. Campos,19 P. Chintalapati,29 A. Choi,16 E. Di Valentino,30 C. Doux,2 K. Herner,29 P. Lemos,31, 32 J. Mena-Fern´andez,33 Y. Omori,10, 3, 24 M. Paterno,29 M. Rodriguez-Monroy,33 P. Rogozenski,7 R. P. Rollins,30 A. Troja,28, 6 I. Tutusaus,14, 15 R. H. Wechsler,34, 24, 35 T. M. C. Abbott,36 M. Aguena,6 S. Allam,29 F. Andrade-Oliveira,5, 6 J. Annis,29 D. Bacon,37 E. Baxter,38 K. Bechtol,39 G. M. Bernstein,2 D. Brooks,31 E. Buckley-Geer,10, 29 D. L. Burke,24, 35 A. Carnero Rosell,40, 6, 41 M. Carrasco Kind,42, 43 J. Carretero,44 F. J. Castander,14, 15 R.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2002.11464V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph] 13 Feb 2020 a Function of the Angles Θ and Φ in the Sky Is Shown in Fig
    Flat Space, Dark Energy, and the Cosmic Microwave Background Kevin Cahill Department of Physics and Astronomy University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 (Dated: February 27, 2020) This paper reviews some of the results of the Planck collaboration and shows how to compute the distance from the surface of last scattering, the distance from the farthest object that will ever be observed, and the maximum radius of a density fluctuation in the plasma of the CMB. It then explains how these distances together with well-known astronomical facts imply that space is flat or nearly flat and that dark energy is 69% of the energy of the universe. I. COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION The cosmic microwave background (CMB) was predicted by Gamow in 1948 [1], estimated to be at a temperature of 5 K by Alpher and Herman in 1950 [2], and discovered by Penzias and Wilson in 1965 [3]. It has been observed in increasing detail by Roll and Wilkinson in 1966 [4], by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) collaboration in 1989{1993 [5, 6], by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) collaboration in 2001{2013 [7, 8], and by the Planck collaboration in 2009{2019 [9{12]. The Planck collaboration measured CMB radiation at nine frequencies from 30 to 857 6 GHz by using a satellite at the Lagrange point L2 in the Earth's shadow some 1.5 10 km × farther from the Sun [11, 12]. Their plot of the temperature T (θ; φ) of the CMB radiation as arXiv:2002.11464v1 [physics.gen-ph] 13 Feb 2020 a function of the angles θ and φ in the sky is shown in Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Physics Faculty Publications Department of Physics & Astrophysics 8-27-2018 Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing T. M. C. Abbott F. B. Abdalla A. Alarcon J. Aleksic S. Allam See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/pa-fac Part of the Astrophysics and Astronomy Commons, and the Physics Commons Recommended Citation Abbott, T. M. C.; Abdalla, F. B.; Alarcon, A.; Aleksic, J.; Allam, S.; Allen, S.; Amara, A.; Annis, J.; Asorey, J.; Avila, S.; Bacon, D.; Balbinot, E.; Banerji, M.; Banik, N.; and Barkhouse, Wayne, "Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing" (2018). Physics Faculty Publications. 13. https://commons.und.edu/pa-fac/13 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Physics & Astrophysics at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Physics Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, A. Alarcon, J. Aleksic, S. Allam, S. Allen, A. Amara, J. Annis, J. Asorey, S. Avila, D. Bacon, E. Balbinot, M. Banerji, N. Banik, and Wayne Barkhouse This article is available at UND Scholarly Commons: https://commons.und.edu/pa-fac/13 DES-2017-0226 FERMILAB-PUB-17-294-PPD Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing T. M. C. Abbott,1 F.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Energy Survey Data Release 1, DES Collaboration
    DES-2017-0315 FERMILAB-PUB-17-603-AE-E DRAFT VERSION JANUARY 9, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61a THE DARK ENERGY SURVEY DATA RELEASE 1 T. M. C. ABBOTT,1 F. B. ABDALLA,2, 3 S. ALLAM,4 A. AMARA,5 J. ANNIS,4 J. ASOREY,6, 7, 8 S. AVILA,9, 10 O. BALLESTER,11 M. BANERJI,12, 13 W. BARKHOUSE,14 L. BARUAH,15 M. BAUMER,16, 17, 18 K. BECHTOL,19 M. R. BECKER,16, 17 A. BENOIT-LÉVY,20, 2, 21 G. M. BERNSTEIN,22 E. BERTIN,20, 21 J. BLAZEK,23, 24 S. BOCQUET,25 D. BROOKS,2 D. BROUT,22 E. BUCKLEY-GEER,4 D. L. BURKE,17, 18 V. BUSTI,26, 27 R. CAMPISANO,26 L. CARDIEL-SAS,11 A. CARNERO ROSELL,28, 26 M. CARRASCO KIND,29, 30 J. CARRETERO,11 F. J. CASTANDER,31, 32 R. CAWTHON,33 C. CHANG,33 C. CONSELICE,34 G. COSTA,26 M. CROCCE,31, 32 C. E. CUNHA,17 C. B. D’ANDREA,22 L. N. DA COSTA,26, 28 R. DAS,35 G. DAUES,29 T. M. DAVIS,7, 8 C. DAVIS,17 J. DE VICENTE,36 D. L. DEPOY,37 J. DEROSE,17, 16 S. DESAI,38 H. T. DIEHL,4 J. P. DIETRICH,39, 40 S. DODELSON,41 P. DOEL,2 A. DRLICA-WAGNER,4 T. F. EIFLER,42, 43 A. E. ELLIOTT,44 A. E. EVRARD,35, 45 A. FARAHI,35 A. FAUSTI NETO,26 E. FERNANDEZ,11 D. A. FINLEY,4 B. FLAUGHER,4 R. J. FOLEY,46 P.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Meeting of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 20-21 September 2018
    Minutes of the Meeting of the Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 20-21 September 2018 Members attending: Dieter Hartmann Rachel Bean John O’Meara (Chair) Andrew Connolly Kelsey Johnson Constance Rockosi Ian Dell’Antonio Mansi Kasliwal Eliza Kempton Shane Larson Agency personnel: Richard Green, NSF-AST Pedro Marronetti, NSF-PHY Diana Phan, NSF-AST Vladimir Papatashvili, NSF-Polar Chris Davis, NSF-AST James Ulvestad, NSF-OD Elizabeth Pentecost, NSF-AST R. Chris Smith, NSF-MPS OAD Richard Barvainis, NSF-AST Paul Hertz, NASA Matt Benacquista, NSF-AST Rita Sambruna, NASA Glen Langston, NSF-AST Evan Scannapieco, NASA Peter Kurczynski, NSF-AST Jim Green, NASA Joseph Pesce, NSF-AST Kartik Sheth, NASA Ken Johnston, NSF-AST Daniel Evans, NASA David Boboltz, NSF-AST Bill Latter, NASA Ralph Gaume, NSF-AST Terri Brandt, NASA Edward Ajhar, NSF-AST Kathy Turner, DOE James Neff, NSF-AST Eric Linder, DOE James Whitmore, NSF-PHY Drew Baden, DOE Jean Cottam Allen, NSF-PHY Others: Rachel Osten, STScI Kevin Stevenson, STScI Philip Puxley, AURA Scott Gaudi, OSU David Charbonneau, Harvard/CfA Peter Plavchan, George Mason U Steve Ritz, UCSC Alexey Vikhlinin, Harvard/CfA Lindsey Millken, Lewis-Burke Jeremy Weirich, AURA Michael Ledford, Lewis-Burke Marcia Smith Monty Di Biasi, SwRI Emily Gibson Sarah Lipscy, Ball Aerospace Wil Thomas Ben Kallen, Lewis-Burke Julianne Arnold Jeff Foust, Space News Mike Henry Ashlee Wilkins, AAS MEETING CONVENED 9:00 AM, 20 SEPTEMBER 2018 The Chair called the meeting to order and welcomed all new Committee members. Introductions were made. The minutes from the June 27, 2018 meeting were approved by the Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dark Energy Survey
    The Dark Energy Survey • Aimed at precision measurements of Dark Energy • 5000 sq-degree 4-bandpass sky survey – g,r,i,z i=24, z=23.6 – Photometric redshifts for South Pole Telescope SZ cluster survey to z > 1. – Cluster counting via SZ, optical, WL – Weak lensing: shear-shear and shear-galaxy power spectra – Galaxy angular power spectra – SN light curves: 1 hour per night for 60 nights over 5 years • The Dark Energy Camera –CTIO 4m prime focus – 2 degree FOV corrector – 66 CCD, 500 megapixel focal plane array – Full depletion LBNL CCDs – ~500 nights over 5 years Jim Annis Fermilab The Dark Energy Survey • Physics of the Universe • NOAO Long Range Plan – “immediate priority is heavily weighted – CTIO 4m aimed at wide field imaging towards investigation of Dark Energy” • DOE Office of Science •CTIO – HEP performs experiments that explore – Announcement of opportunity the fundamental nature of matter, – Major instrumentation in return for up energy, space, and time, often leading to 30% telescope time over 5 years to the development of cutting edge technology – DOE teams most often centered at one of the National Labs, almost always • The System and Surveys including university-based researchers – 4m telescope: imaging surveys • Fermilab – 8m telescopes: spectroscopic surveys – Dark Matter: SDSS and CDMS – Experiment driven collaborations – Dark Energy: DES and JDEM provide instrumentation/software • DES collaboration – Surveys provide the best science for the – Fermilab, University of Illinois, most researchers at the least cost NOAO, NCSA, University of Chicago, LBNL, Carnegie Jim Annis Fermilab We aim at ~5% precision on Dark Energy Cluster Counting Weak Lensing Supernova w w w Ω Ω ΩM DE M δ w ~ 5% and δ ΩDE ~ 3% The Planck satellite will provide tighter input CMB measurements, and the constraints will improve slightly.
    [Show full text]