Shorebird Conservation in Australia 2002

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Shorebird Conservation in Australia 2002 1 S HOREBIRD C ONSERVATION IN A USTRALIA by Bianca Priest, Phil Straw and Michael Weston Supplement to Wingspan, vol. 12, no. 4, December 2002 ii Shorebird Conservation in Australia Shorebirds, also known as waders, are seen feeding around the edges of coastal beaches and shorelines, estuaries and mudflats, or inland lakes, lagoons and dams. While most frequent coastal or inland wetlands, a few species occur in grasslands, farmland and bushland. FROM THE TAXONOMIC order Charadriiformes, there are 18 species of resident shorebird (those that Below: While in Australia, shorebirds include plovers, sandpipers, stints, live in Australia all year round), and at least 36 species migratory shorebirds begin curlews, knots, snipes, godwits, avocets, stilts, that migrate each year from other countries to spend to moult into breeding plumage before the long oystercatchers, pratincoles, and some other species. their non-breeding season here. A further 21 vagrant return flight to the Arctic. (Terns and gulls are often grouped together with species are occasionally recorded in Australia This Black-tailed Godwit shorebirds as they too occur in many of the same (see Table). (second bird from left) and habitats, but are not discussed here.) male Bar-tailed Godwit Shorebirds come in different shapes and sizes, Migratory shorebirds (far right) are in full breeding plumage. The Bar-tailed ranging from the tiny Red-necked Stint, which Migratory shorebirds undertake annual migrations Godwits at the back remain weighs only 30 g, to the Eastern Curlew, which can of thousands of kilometres between their non- in non-breeding plumage, weigh up to 1.3 kg. They have a variety of bill breeding and breeding areas, in many cases flying while some of the Great shapes and sizes adapted to the different prey they from the southernmost wetlands of the southern Knots at the front are in the feed on, and legs that vary from long to very long. hemisphere to the coasts and islands of the high process of moulting into breeding plumage. Roebuck One spectacular feature of this group of birds is Arctic. Northward migration to the breeding Bay, north-western Australia. their movements, both within Australia and between grounds typically takes place from March to early Photo by Brian Chudleigh the northern and southern hemispheres. In Australia June, whilst the return migration to non-breeding areas occurs from July to October. During their migration, shorebirds stop off at a number of wetland sites where they feed intensively to build up stores of fat and protein to fuel the next leg of their flight. These migration routes are called Flyways. There are eight shorebird Flyways around the world, each consisting of a geographical grouping of similar routes shared by many species. The East Asian–Australasian Flyway stretches from Siberia and Alaska southwards through east and south-east Asia, to Australia and New Zealand (see Flyway map, p. V). It encompasses 22 countries and is used by 55 migratory species and by over 5 million birds. The breeding season of these migratory shorebirds is a short and hectic period that capitalises on the abundant supply of insect food present in the brief arctic summer. Birds must arrive and breed as soon as snow and ice starts to melt in the nesting Shorebird Conservation in Australia iii areas. Clutches, typically of four eggs, are laid within a week or two of arrival; incubation then takes about three weeks and fledging a further three. Then it’s time to head south before the weather worsens and the food supply dries up. A migrant species that differs from this pattern is the Double-banded Plover, which breeds in New Zealand and migrates to Australia from February to September. A few Australian Pratincole breed in Australia and migrate to Indonesia and New Guinea from March to November; most, however, remain in Australia year-round, so we have classified them here as ‘resident species’. Main picture: Resident Black-winged Stilts and migratory Eastern Curlews roosting at high tide, Roebuck Bay, north-western Australia. Typically, non-breeding shorebirds are gregarious and often Resident shorebirds occur in very large concentrations. Along the coast, their day is normally ruled by the tides – they Resident shorebirds breed in Australia and include feed on shellfish, crabs, shrimps and worms when mudflats are exposed at low tide, and roost on some species that nest exclusively on beaches (e.g. beaches and spits during high tide. Photo by Jan van de Kam the Beach Stone-curlew and Pied Oystercatcher) Above: Painted Snipe, Mt Carbine, Qld. The Vulnerable Painted Snipe is the subject of a recent and others such as the Sooty Oystercatcher that nest national volunteer survey co-ordinated by Birds Australia’s Threatened Bird Network and the AWSG. This survey has documented the distribution and occurrence of the species, and has already on rocky coasts. Resident shorebirds use every type saved one wetland from destruction. Photo by Keith & Lindsay Fisher of wetland: the Painted Snipe, for example, breeds on ephemeral fresh water wetlands, while the Below: The tiny Red-necked Stint, Australia’s smallest migratory shorebird at only 30 g, nevertheless manages to make the huge journey to breed in the Arctic – a distance of some 15,000 km one-way! Banded Stilt breeds on hypersaline lakes in inland Photo by Brian Chudleigh Australia. Some resident species have moved beyond wetlands – the Plains-wanderer nests in grasslands, the Bush Stone-curlew in open woodland and the Resident, migratory and vagrant shorebirds in Australia Masked Lapwing commonly breeds in agricultural and urban landscapes. Resident Migratory Vagrant Resident shorebirds may nest in large colonies Australian Pratincole * Asian Dowitcher American Golden Plover (e.g. Banded Stilt), as solitary pairs (e.g. Black-fronted Banded Lapwing Bar-tailed Godwit Baird’s Sandpiper Plover) or sometimes in loose groups (e.g. Painted Banded Stilt Black-tailed Godwit Buff-breasted Sandpiper Beach Stone-curlew Broad-billed Sandpiper Caspian Plover Snipe). They may be sedentary or undertake nomadic Black-fronted Dotterel Common Greenshank Dunlin movements, depending on availability of habitat and Black-winged Stilt Common Redshank Green Sandpiper breeding opportunities. An example of a sedentary Bush Stone-curlew Common Sandpiper Grey Phalarope species is the Hooded Plover, whose beach Comb-crested Jacana Curlew Sandpiper Hudsonian Godwit environment is relatively stable throughout the year, Hooded Plover Double-banded Plover Kentish Plover thus fulfilling the bird’s requirements year-round. Inland Dotterel Eastern Curlew Lesser Yellowlegs Masked Lapwing Great Knot Little Stint The Banded Stilt, on the other hand, is a nomadic Painted Snipe Greater Sand Plover Little Ringed Plover species that moves in vast numbers from coastal areas Pied Oystercatcher Grey Plover Pheasant-tailed Jacana to central Australia, to exploit the explosion of brine Plains-wanderer Grey-tailed Tattler Ringed Plover shrimp in ephemeral wetlands following Red-capped Plover Latham’s Snipe Short-billed Dowitcher unpredictable rains. Red-kneed Dotterel Lesser Sand Plover South Island Pied Oyster- Red-necked Avocet Little Curlew catcher Sooty Oystercatcher Long-toed Stint Spotted Redshank Marsh Sandpiper Stilt Sandpiper Oriental Plover Upland Sandpiper Oriental Pratincole White-rumped Sandpiper Pacific Golden Plover Wilson’s Phalarope Pectoral Sandpiper Pin-tailed Snipe Red Knot Red-necked Phalarope Red-necked Stint Ruddy Turnstone Ruff Sanderling Sharp-tailed Sandpiper Swinhoe’s Snipe Terek Sandpiper Wandering Tattler Whimbrel Wood Sandpiper * A few Australian Pratincoles migrate to Indonesia and New Guinea. iv Shorebird Conservation in Australia M AIN T HREATS west. It has a massive 22,400 km2 of intertidal flats – the largest expanse in the world. Six hundred Above: Pied Oystercatchers Threats to migratory shorebirds million people (about 10 per cent of the world’s breed on beaches and Australia’s migratory shorebirds encounter few human- population) live in its catchment area. along the shores of other induced problems on their breeding grounds, which The numbers of shorebirds using the Yellow Sea coastal wetlands, laying their eggs in simple scrapes are in sparsely populated areas. However, they share the wetlands are staggering: at least 2 million birds, or on the ground. Nests are East Asian–Australasian Flyway with more than 45 per about 40 per cent of all birds using the East often cryptic, making them cent of the world’s human population, in countries Asian–Australasian Flyway (EAAF), during their susceptible to trampling by with rapidly developing economies. The resultant northward migration alone. The area supports more walkers or crushing by economic and social pressures pose major threats to than 30 per cent of the EAAF populations of 18 4WDs. Eggs and young chicks which have been migratory shorebirds, primarily through wetland species during northward migration; for six of the abandoned by parent birds destruction and alteration, pollution and hunting. species (Bar-tailed Godwit, Eurasian and Eastern disturbed by people, dogs Northward migration is a critical time for migratory Curlews, Great Knot, and Grey and Kentish and vehicles are left shorebirds because they have a very tight schedule if they Plovers), the region carries almost the whole EAAF vulnerable to changes in are to arrive at the breeding grounds on time and in population at this time. temperature and predation by foxes, cats and other good condition, to make full use of the short breeding About 1 million birds use these wetlands on birds. (Oystercatcher) season. Good feeding conditions and safe roosting sites their southward passage. by Kelvin Jakes; (eggs) on the way are essential for successful breeding. While most shorebirds use the region’s wetlands by Bianca Priest The most important region for shorebirds on as migration stopover sites, seven species also occur Far right: Banded Stilt northward migration is the Yellow Sea, yet its in significant concentrations during the non- breeding colony, Lake coastal wetlands are probably the most threatened breeding season and five species breed there in Ballard, WA, 1995.
Recommended publications
  • Western Australian Bird Notes 85: 8
    WesternWestern AustralianAustralian BirdBird NotesNotes Quarterly Newsletter of Birds Australia Western Australia Inc CONSERVATION THROUGH KNOWLEDGE (a division of Royal Australasian Ornithologists Union) No 117 March 2006 ISSN 1445-3983 C on t e n t s Observations ........................................ p6 Notices.................................................p20 Coming Events ....................................p27 BAWA Reports...................................... p8 New Members......................................p22 Crossword Answers ...........................p31 BAWA Projects................................... p10 Country Groups ..................................p23 Opportunities for Volunteers .............p32 Members’ Contributions.................... p14 Excursion Reports..............................p23 Calendar of Events..............................p32 Crossword........................................... p19 Observatories......................................p26 SOOTY OYSTERCATCHER SITES IN SOUTH WESTERN AUSTRALIA For more than ten years now, members from Birds Australia rocky coastline. Sites where Sooty Oystercatcher sightings WA have been involved in Hooded Plover surveys. During have been recorded are shown in Table 1. this time, much information has been gained on Hooded Plovers, but other data have also been gathered. Coastal distribution of Sooty Oystercatchers from Perth to Eyre Observers were asked to complete a survey sheet and record sightings of other wader species. Consequently, in addition to Perth Hooded
    [Show full text]
  • Pyura Doppelgangera to Support Regional Response Decisions
    REPORT NO. 2480 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE SEA SQUIRT PYURA DOPPELGANGERA TO SUPPORT REGIONAL RESPONSE DECISIONS CAWTHRON INSTITUTE | REPORT NO. 2480 JUNE 2014 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE SEA SQUIRT PYURA DOPPELGANGERA TO SUPPORT REGIONAL RESPONSE DECISIONS LAUREN FLETCHER Prepared for Marlborough District Council CAWTHRON INSTITUTE 98 Halifax Street East, Nelson 7010 | Private Bag 2, Nelson 7042 | New Zealand Ph. +64 3 548 2319 | Fax. +64 3 546 9464 www.cawthron.org.nz REVIEWED BY: APPROVED FOR RELEASE BY: Javier Atalah Chris Cornelisen ISSUE DATE: 3 June 2014 RECOMMENDED CITATION: Fletcher LM 2014. Background information on the sea squirt, Pyura doppelgangera to support regional response decisions. Prepared for Marlborough District Council. Cawthron Report No. 2480. 30 p. © COPYRIGHT: Cawthron Institute. This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part without further permission of the Cawthron Institute, provided that the author and Cawthron Institute are properly acknowledged. CAWTHRON INSTITUTE | REPORT NO. 2480 JUNE 2014 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The non-indigenous solitary sea squirt, Pyura doppelgangera (herein Pyura), was first detected in New Zealand in 2007 after a large population was found in the very north of the North Island. A delimitation survey by the Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) during October 2009 found established populations at 21 locations within the region. It is not known how long Pyura has been present in New Zealand, although it is not believed to be a recent introduction. Pyura is an aggressive interspecific competitor for primary space. As such, this species may negatively impact native green-lipped mussel beds present, with associated impacts to key social and cultural values.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Invertebrates and Waterbirds of Wetlands and Rivers of the Southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia
    DOI: 10.18195/issn.0313-122x.61.2000.217-265 Records of the Western Australian Museum Supplement No. 61: 217-265 (2000). Aquatic invertebrates and waterbirds of wetlands and rivers of the southern Carnarvon Basin, Western Australia 3 3 S.A. Halsel, R.J. ShieF, A.W. Storey, D.H.D. Edward , I. Lansburyt, D.J. Cale and M.S. HarveyS 1 Department of Conservation and Land Management, Wildlife Research Centre, PO Box 51, Wanneroo, Western Australia 6946, Australia 2CRC for Freshwater Ecology, Murray-Darling Freshwater Research Centre, PO Box 921, Albury, New South Wales 2640, Australia 3 Department of Zoology, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia 6907, Australia 4 Hope Entomological Collections, Oxford University Museum, Parks Road, Oxford OXl 3PW, United Kingdom 5 Department of Terrestrial Invertebrates, Western Australian Museum, Francis Street, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia Abstract - Fifty-six sites, representing 53 wetlands, were surveyed in the southern Carnarvon Basin in 1994 and 1995 with the aim of documenting the waterbird and aquatic invertebrate fauna of the region. Most sites were surveyed in both winter and summer, although some contained water only one occasion. Altogether 57 waterbird species were recorded, with 29 292 waterbirds of 25 species on Lake MacLeod in October 1994. River pools were shown to be relatively important for waterbirds, while many freshwater claypans were little used. At least 492 species of aquatic invertebrate were collected. The invertebrate fauna was characterized by the low frequency with which taxa occurred: a third of the species were collected at a single site on only one occasion.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 1 General Introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds
    CHAPTER 1 General introduction 1.1 Shorebirds in Australia Shorebirds, sometimes referred to as waders, are birds that rely on coastal beaches, shorelines, estuaries and mudflats, or inland lakes, lagoons and the like for part of, and in some cases all of, their daily and annual requirements, i.e. food and shelter, breeding habitat. They are of the suborder Charadrii and include the curlews, snipe, plovers, sandpipers, stilts, oystercatchers and a number of other species, making up a diverse group of birds. Within Australia, shorebirds account for 10% of all bird species (Lane 1987) and in New South Wales (NSW), this figure increases marginally to 11% (Smith 1991). Of these shorebirds, 45% rely exclusively on coastal habitat (Smith 1991). The majority, however, are either migratory or vagrant species, leaving only five resident species that will permanently inhabit coastal shorelines/beaches within Australia. Australian resident shorebirds include the Beach Stone-curlew (Esacus neglectus), Hooded Plover (Charadrius rubricollis), Red- capped Plover (Charadrius ruficapillus), Australian Pied Oystercatcher (Haematopus longirostris) and Sooty Oystercatcher (Haematopus fuliginosus) (Smith 1991, Priest et al. 2002). These species are generally classified as ‘beach-nesting’, nesting on sandy ocean beaches, sand spits and sand islands within estuaries. However, the Sooty Oystercatcher is an island-nesting species, using rocky shores of near- and offshore islands rather than sandy beaches. The plovers may also nest by inland salt lakes. Shorebirds around the globe have become increasingly threatened with the pressure of predation, competition, human encroachment and disturbance and global warming. Populations of birds breeding in coastal areas which also support a burgeoning human population are under the highest threat.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island
    A Guide to the Birds of Barrow Island Operated by Chevron Australia This document has been printed by a Sustainable Green Printer on stock that is certified carbon in joint venture with neutral and is Forestry Stewardship Council (FSC) mix certified, ensuring fibres are sourced from certified and well managed forests. The stock 55% recycled (30% pre consumer, 25% post- Cert no. L2/0011.2010 consumer) and has an ISO 14001 Environmental Certification. ISBN 978-0-9871120-1-9 Gorgon Project Osaka Gas | Tokyo Gas | Chubu Electric Power Chevron’s Policy on Working in Sensitive Areas Protecting the safety and health of people and the environment is a Chevron core value. About the Authors Therefore, we: • Strive to design our facilities and conduct our operations to avoid adverse impacts to human health and to operate in an environmentally sound, reliable and Dr Dorian Moro efficient manner. • Conduct our operations responsibly in all areas, including environments with sensitive Dorian Moro works for Chevron Australia as the Terrestrial Ecologist biological characteristics. in the Australasia Strategic Business Unit. His Bachelor of Science Chevron strives to avoid or reduce significant risks and impacts our projects and (Hons) studies at La Trobe University (Victoria), focused on small operations may pose to sensitive species, habitats and ecosystems. This means that we: mammal communities in coastal areas of Victoria. His PhD (University • Integrate biodiversity into our business decision-making and management through our of Western Australia)
    [Show full text]
  • Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar Site: Ecological Character Description in Good Faith, Exercising All Due Care and Attention
    Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site Ecological character description Disclaimer The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW (DECCW) has compiled the Towra Point Nature Reserve Ramsar site: Ecological character description in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. DECCW does not accept responsibility for any inaccurate or incomplete information supplied by third parties. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. Readers should seek appropriate advice about the suitability of the information to their needs. The views and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Australian Government or of the Minister for Environment Protection, Heritage and the Arts. Acknowledgements Phil Straw, Australasian Wader Studies Group; Bob Creese, Bruce Pease, Trudy Walford and Rob Williams, Department of Primary Industries (NSW); Simon Annabel and Rob Lea, NSW Maritime; Geoff Doret, Ian Drinnan and Brendan Graham, Sutherland Shire Council; John Dahlenburg, Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority. Symbols for conceptual diagrams are courtesy of the Integration and Application Network (ian.umces.edu/symbols), University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science. This publication has been prepared with funding provided by the Australian Government to the Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority through the Coastal Catchments Initiative Program. © State of NSW, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, and Sydney Metropolitan Catchment Management Authority DECCW and SMCMA are pleased to allow the reproduction of material from this publication on the condition that the source, publisher and authorship are appropriately acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • Habitat Types
    Habitat Types The following section features ten predominant habitat types on the West Coast of the Eyre Peninsula, South Australia. It provides a description of each habitat type and the native plant and fauna species that commonly occur there. The fauna species lists in this section are not limited to the species included in this publication and include other coastal fauna species. Fauna species included in this publication are printed in bold. Information is also provided on specific threats and reference sites for each habitat type. The habitat types presented are generally either characteristic of high-energy exposed coastline or low-energy sheltered coastline. Open sandy beaches, non-vegetated dunefields, coastal cliffs and cliff tops are all typically found along high energy, exposed coastline, while mangroves, sand flats and saltmarsh/samphire are characteristic of low energy, sheltered coastline. Habitat Types Coastal Dune Shrublands NATURAL DISTRIBUTION shrublands of larger vegetation occur on more stable dunes and Found throughout the coastal environment, from low beachfront cliff-top dunes with deep stable sand. Most large dune shrublands locations to elevated clifftops, wherever sand can accumulate. will be composed of a mosaic of transitional vegetation patches ranging from bare sand to dense shrub cover. DESCRIPTION This habitat type is associated with sandy coastal dunes occurring The understory generally consists of moderate to high diversity of along exposed and sometimes more sheltered coastline. Dunes are low shrubs, sedges and groundcovers. Understory diversity is often created by the deposition of dry sand particles from the beach by driven by the position and aspect of the dune slope.
    [Show full text]
  • (Aves: Charadriiformes) by of Ornithology, Previously the Chaotic Ostralegus Longi
    Multivariate assessment of the phenetic affinities of Australasian oystercatchers (Aves: Charadriiformes) by Allan J. Baker Department of Ornithology, Royal Ontario Museum, and Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada Abstract tion in morphological characters (Baker, 1975). The Australian taxa have suffered similar treat- Phenetic affinities of Australasian oystercatchers were eluci- dated multivariate statistical of seven The first by analysis morpho- ment, as illustrated below. oystercatcher metric characters taken from skins. Nineteen museum opera- to receive formal recognition was a pied bird, tional taxonomie units (OTUs), representing all the currently described Vieillot as and most of the subordinate by (1817) Haematopus longi- recognized species taxa, were used to calibrate morphological variation in Australasian rostris. Three further pied birds from northwestern the by the Haematopus against range displayed Haematopo- South Australia, New Wales and Queensland were didae. The rather of variation homogeneous nature among H. described respectively as picatus King, 1826, OTUs was not well suited for analysis by hierarchical but ordination method H. australianus H. clustering methods, a non-hierarchical Gould, 1838 and longirostris utilizing both principal components and nonmetric scaling Mathews mattingleyi Mathews, 1912. (1912) syn- produced excellent summaries of the similarity matrices. onymized H. australianus with the nominate H. The South Island Pied Oystercatcher (H. o. finschi) of New Zealand clustered tightly with the Eurasian H. ostra- l. longirostris, and restricted picatus as a sub- and thus be of Palaearctic All the legus seems to origin. of H. The he species longirostris. following year remaining Australasian taxa grouped in another cluster with these taxa under H. the New World and it that the submerged ostralegus longi- forms, appears likely Australian Pied Oystercatcher will have to be split from the rostris Vieillot, ostensibly because of the paucity Comments the ostralegus group as a separate species.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of Australia's Shorebirds
    Ecology and Conservation of Australia’s Shorebirds Robert Scott Clemens B.S. Wildlife Biology M.S. Natural Resources A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2016 School of Biological Sciences 1 Abstract Global biodiversity continues to decline rapidly, and addressing this situation requires an understanding of both the problems and the solutions. This understanding is urgently required for animals occupying wetlands, among the most threatened of all habitats globally. In this thesis I focus on the ecology and conservation of shorebirds, a group comprising many threatened and declining species dependent on wetlands throughout much of their annual cycle. I focus on threats operating within Australia, where wetland loss and degradation continues due to human activity. Non-migratory shorebird species that travel widely across Australia’s inland wetlands have been reported as declining in eastern Australia, but a national assessment is lacking. Migratory shorebird species that visit Australia from breeding grounds overseas appear to be declining most due to factors beyond Australia’s borders, but it is not clear if threats located in Australia are exacerbating these declines. I make the most of the rich data available on shorebirds in Australia to address these knowledge gaps, in the hopes of better targeting shorebird conservation actions in Australia. In chapter one I introduce the importance of conserving migratory and highly mobile species. I then review how pulses in resource availability such as those exemplified by Australia’s ephemeral wetlands impact wildlife populations. I also provide an overview of shorebird conservation in Australia. These introductions provide the theoretical underpinning for the work presented later, and highlight the challenges inherent in understanding where and when highly mobile species such as shorebirds have been impacted.
    [Show full text]
  • School Projects for Monitoring the State of the Marine Environment
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 457 021 SE 065 183 AUTHOR Benkendorff, Kirsten TITLE School Projects for Monitoring the State of the Marine Environment. PUB DATE 2001-07-00 NOTE 7p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Science Teachers Association (Sydney, Australia, July 2001). PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom (055) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Biodiversity; Elementary Secondary Education; Foreign Countries; *Government School Relationship; Habitats; Hands on Science; *Marine Biology; *Science Curriculum; Science Instruction; *Science Projects IDENTIFIERS *Australia ABSTRACT Australia's marine environment hosts a high level of diverse endemic species along with some of the highest biodiversity in the world. Two-thirds of the population of Australia are living in coastal areas and can be considered a threat to marine life which is very vulnerable to human impacts. Although marine environments conserve high economic values, long-term research on changes in marine life and its conservation are very limited. This paper provides insight into the implementation of marine education in the science curricula and discusses the advantages of involving .schools in long-term monitoring of marine environments for management purposes. (Contains 10 references.) (YDS) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. School Projects for Monitoring the State of the Marine Environment by Kirsten Benekendorff U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION dice 01 Educational Research and improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE AND CENTER (ERIC) DISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL HAS This document has been reproduced as BEEN GRANTED BY 'received from the person or organization originating it.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology and Conservation of the Unique and Diverse Halophilic Macroinvertebrates of Australian Salt Lakes
    CSIRO PUBLISHING Marine and Freshwater Research Corrigendum https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21088_CO Biology and conservation of the unique and diverse halophilic macroinvertebrates of Australian salt lakes Angus D’Arcy Lawrie, Jennifer Chaplin and Adrian Pinder Marine and Freshwater Research. [Published online 2 July 2021]. https://doi.org/10.1071/MF21088 The authors of the above-mentioned paper regret to inform readers that there were errors published in the systematics of one of the taxa in the manuscript. The list of groups in the Cladocera section (on p. F) was published as below: The bulk of Cladocera that occur in inland waters in Australia are restricted to fresh water, but three groups have representatives in salt lakes. These groups comprise: (1) six species of Daphniopsis (or Daphnia; see below); (2) two species of Daphnia (Daphnia salinifera Hebert and Daphnia neosalinifera Hebert) from the Daphnia carinata (King) subgenus; and (3) three species of chydorid: Moina baylyi Forro´, Moina mongolica Daday and Extremalona timmsi Sinev & Shiel. This text should have been as below (changes underlined): The bulk of Cladocera that occur in inland waters in Australia are restricted to fresh water, but four groups have representatives in salt lakes. These groups comprise: (1) six species of Daphniopsis (or Daphnia; see below); (2) two species of Daphnia (Daphnia salinifera Hebert and Daphnia neosalinifera Hebert) from the Daphnia carinata (King) subgenus; (3) two Moina species (Moina baylyi Forro´ and Moina mongolica Daday); and (4) one species of chydorid (Extremalona timmsi Sinev & Shiel). Furthermore, the title of the Chydorids section should have been titled Moinids and chydorids.
    [Show full text]