DOCSLIB.ORG

Invertebrate Study for Portion 62 of the Farm Witpoortjie 177-Ir, Gauteng Province

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Invertebrate Study for Portion 62 of the Farm Witpoortjie 177-Ir, Gauteng Province INVERTEBRATE STUDY FOR PORTION 62 OF THE FARM WITPOORTJIE 177-IR, GAUTENG PROVINCE by V.C. VAN DER MERWE BSc Entomology, MSc Conservation Biology Commisioned by Envirogaurd December 2018 V.C. VAN DER MERWE EMAIL: [email protected] P.O.BOX 72 CELL: 074 166 0410 HAENERTSBURG 12 DECEMBER 2018 0730 LIMPOPO, SOUTH AFRICA Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 1 To Envirogaurd INVERTEBRATE STUDY FOR PORTION 62 OF THE FARM WITPOORTJIE 177-IR, GAUTENG PROVINCE We have the pleasure in submitting herewith our report as requested and as per your correspondence and appointment dated 11th November 2018. This study has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of Regulations gazetted in the Government Notice No R1183 of 6/9/1997 for the Department of Nature Conservation, of Gauteng Province, and also DEAT (2005) Guideline 3: General Guide to the Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations, 2005, Integrated Environmental Management Guideline Series, Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT), Pretoria. The aim of this report was to provide the client with a description of potential status of Red Data Invertebrate species and habitat that could be potentially suitable for the presence of these species on Portion 62 of the Farm Witpoortjie 177-IR. A concerted effort was made to locate four invertebrate species of conservation concern, including three butterfly species (Lepidochrysops praeterita, Chrysoritis aureus and Aloeides dentatis) and one cetonid beetle (Ichnestoma stobbiai). These species were not observed during the survey. The vast majority of the site consists of open grasslands and old fields that has been heavily invaded by anthropogenic, pioneer and exotic plant species. These areas are totally transformed and no natural vegetation remains. Three seasonally inundated depressions on the eastern portion of the site constitute the only sensitive habitat in the survey area. Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY…………………………………………… 2 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………….. 4 STUDY AREA……………………………………………………….. 6 MATERIALS & METHODS………………………………………… 12 RESULTS…………………………………………………………….. 14 DISCUSSION………………………………………………...………. 20 RECOMMENDATIONS…………………………………………….. 23 REFERENCES………………………………………………………. 26 Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 3 INTRODUCTION Biodiversity is the variability among living organisms on earth, including the variability within and between species and within and between ecosystems. The biodiversity of Gauteng is under constant threat from human settlement and societal development. Natural land is degraded and transformed by the rapid expansion of human settlements, such as residential areas, mines, manufacturing plants, transport and agriculture, that have an ever-increasing demand for space. The loss, fragmentation and degradation of natural habitat through urbanisation and an increase in human population numbers, represent the greatest threats to rare and endangered invertebrate species in Gauteng. Sustainable development is an evolving concept, which is continually being redefined and reinterpreted and should form the basis of the planning processes of new developments. Reducing the burden of environmental impacts is necessary if development is to become sustainable. The process of planning new developments should be based on scientific, ecological principles and used as a planning tool to promote sustainable development by integrating environmental considerations into a wide range of proposed actions. Development planning must be intended to ensure that development proposals do not undermine critical resource and ecological functions, by improving the way these environmental resources are utilised, or the well being, lifestyle and livelihood of the communities and peoples who depend on them. Invertebrates dominate terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems, with insects being the most speciose class, comprising more than 75% of all known species in the Animal Kingdom. Insects and arachnids form part of the diverse and essential natural processes that sustain biological systems. The insect-plant interaction is the most common biotic interaction on Earth, and indeed, our present ecosystems would not function without these invertebrates. The worldwide Red List of Threatened Species (http://www.redlist.org/info/tables/table1) contains approximately 560 insects. This is a meagre 7% of the faunal list, which when one consider that insects make up over 70% of the worlds fauna, is tremendously negatively biased. In a study carried out by Black and Vaughn (2003), it was noted that of the world’s insects, very few groups have been assessed on a worldwide scale. Approximately 10% of Swallowtail butterflies, for example, are considered globally threatened. Based on a mathematical model, McKinney (2003), predicted that 10% of all butterflies were threatened contrasting to the 1% currently listed. At National levels, figures between 10% and 34% are given for the number of threatened indigenous insect species, suggesting that the overall number of threatened insects could be in excess of 100, 000. Globally countries such as Australia, France, Spain, the United Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 4 States and South Africa have among the highest numbers of threatened invertebrates. This is however, more a reflection of the effort made by these countries to assess their biodiversity and hence distinguish those that are threatened rather than a true overall indication. Insects have an enormous functional value because of the numerous individuals and the great intra- and interspecific variety. The ecological importance of this great variety of insects makes them valuable to assess disturbances or environmental impacts. A sound knowledge of arthropods is crucial to the conservation and management of ecosystems because a skewed focus only on the larger organisms will misrepresent ecosystem dynamics. The lack of human appreciation of the importance of invertebrates and their general disregard and dislike, coupled to the fact that only about 7-10% of insects are scientifically described, must be overcome to realistically conserve biodiversity. Photograph 1. The majority of the site has been subject to heavy overgrazing. Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 5 STUDY AREA Figure 1. Locality map of the proposed Witpoortjie site. Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 6 Photograph 2. The Witpoortjie site is dominated by Tsakane Clay Grassland in various stages of transformation and degradation. Situated within the lower-lying areas as well as shallow depressions are seasonally inundated pans. The Witpoortjie site is situated within the East Rand of Gauteng. The site is bordered to the west by the M43 (Sailfin), R554 and Van Dyk Dam to the north and open grasslands and Dalpark to the east and degraded open grasslands to the south (see Figure 1 above). Major bulk pipelines and railway track occur on the southern boundary of the site. Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 7 Figure 2. An elevation profile of the site. The site has a gentle sloping topography from the north towards the east with an average slope of 1.3%. The major topographical features are the artificially created mine dumps (old slimes dam) on the northern portion of the site. Vegetation composition in the area consists of Mesic Highveld Grasslands in various stages of transformation and degradation falling within the Tsakane Clay Grassland (Gm 9) vegetation unit (Mucina & Rutherford 2006; see Figure 4 below). The majority of grasslands have been historically transformed through agricultural activities as well as high-density residential developments and associated high levels of anthropogenic disturbances including extensive illegal dumping activities, littering, frequent fires (burning of waste) and harvesting of traditional medicinal plants. The grasslands to the south of the site comprise of degraded grassland with limited herb and forb diversity. Patches of primary Themeda triandra grassland were observed on the western, southern as well as central portions of the site. Several patches of the hydrophilic Imperata cylindrica was observed within a mosaic in areas with elevated soil moisture throughout the site. One general habitat sensitivity scans was carried out mainly during daylight hours (9h00- 14h00) on the 22nd of November 2018. The majority of the surveys were conducted on existing roads, livestock pathways as well as off-road vehicle and quad bike tracks within the grasslands. Due to the large size of the site little time was spent surveying the old slimes dam and mine dumps or degraded habitats Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 8 Figure 3. Vegetation map of the Witpoortjie site situated within Tsakane Clay Grassland (Gm9) (adapted from Mucina et al. 2006). Invertebrate Assessment – Ptn 62 Witpoortjie 9 Vegetation type Mesic Highveld Grassland is found mainly in the eastern, precipitation-rich regions of the Highveld, extending as far as the Northern Escarpment. These are predominantly ‘sour’ grasslands and are dominated primarily by andropogonoid grasses. The different grassland units are distinguished on the basis of geology and other substrate properties, as well as elevation, topography and rainfall. The vegetation of the site falls within the Tsakane Clay Grassland (Gm 8) vegetation unit (Mucina & Rutherford 2006). The vegetation on the site comprised cool Highveld Grassland in various stages of transformation and degradation. Patches of Themeda traiandra
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana
    Open Journal of Ecology, 2014, 4, 1061-1079 Published Online December 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/oje http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oje.2014.417087 Species Composition and Diversity of Insects of the Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve in Ghana Rosina Kyerematen1,2*, Erasmus Henaku Owusu1, Daniel Acquah-Lamptey1, Roger Sigismund Anderson2, Yaa Ntiamoa-Baidu1,3 1Department of Animal Biology and Conservation Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 2African Regional Postgraduate Programme in Insect Science, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana 3Centre for African Wetlands, University of Ghana, Legon, Ghana Email: *[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Received 6 September 2014; revised 9 November 2014; accepted 21 November 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Kogyae Strict Nature Reserve, the only one in Ghana, was established to promote scientific re- search, particularly on how nature revitalizes itself after major disasters, and also to check the southward drift of the savannah grassland. This study presents the first comprehensive inventory of species composition and diversity of insects of the Reserve. Insects were surveyed between September 2011 and June 2012 to capture the end of the rainy season, the dry season and the peak of the wet season. Samples were taken from two sites within the Reserve, Dagomba and Oku using various sampling techniques including pitfall traps, malaise traps and sweep nets. Insect com- munities were characterized in terms of, 1) species richness estimators, 2) species richness, 3) Shannon-Weiner Index of Diversity, 4) Pielou’s evenness and 5) Bray-Curtis similarity.
    [Show full text]
  • Metamorphosis Vol 12(3) Complete.Pdf
    ELECTED COUNCILLORS Hermann Staude Chairman (2 years) [email protected] Alf Curle Treasurer (2 years) [email protected] Alan Heath Secretary/ membership (2 years) [email protected] Bennie Coetzer Data processing (2 years) [email protected] Doug Kroon Journal Editor (5 years) [email protected] Graham Henning Conservation (2 years) [email protected] Mark Williams Scientific Editor (2 years) [email protected] Jonathan Ball Western Cape Branch (2 years) [email protected] Steve Woodhall Gauteng Branch (2 years) [email protected] CO-OPTED MEMBERS Martin Krüger Transvaal Museum Representative [email protected] Peter Roos Webmaster [email protected] Reinier Terblanche Youth I Education [email protected] AREA REPRESENTATIVES Steve Collins East Africa Branch [email protected] Alan Gardiner Zimbabwe Branch [email protected] Haydon Warren-Gash West Africa [email protected] EDITORIAL Editor: Doug Kroon. Scientific advisers: Martin Krüger. Rolf Oberprieler, Stephen Henning, Malcolm Scoble, Henk Geertsema, Alan Gardiner, Dick Vane-Wright, Axel Hausmann. MEMBERSHIP The aims of the Lepidopterists' Society of Africa are to promote the scientific study and the conservation of Lepidoptera in Africa, and to provide a communication forum for all people who are interested in African Lepidoptera. Metamorphosis, which is the official journal of the Society, publishes original scientific papers as well as articles of a less technical nature. Fees indicated below refer to surface postage, but if airmail is required, notify the Treasurer and - per issue – add R32.00 for Africa or US $6.00 if Overseas. Membership of the Society is open to all persons who are interested in the study of Lepidoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • African Butterfly News Can Be Downloaded Here
    LATE SUMMER EDITION: JANUARY / AFRICAN FEBRUARY 2018 - 1 BUTTERFLY THE LEPIDOPTERISTS’ SOCIETY OF AFRICA NEWS LATEST NEWS Welcome to the first newsletter of 2018! I trust you all have returned safely from your December break (assuming you had one!) and are getting into the swing of 2018? With few exceptions, 2017 was a very poor year butterfly-wise, at least in South Africa. The drought continues to have a very negative impact on our hobby, but here’s hoping that 2018 will be better! Braving the Great Karoo and Noorsveld (Mark Williams) In the first week of November 2017 Jeremy Dobson and I headed off south from Egoli, at the crack of dawn, for the ‘Harde Karoo’. (Is there a ‘Soft Karoo’?) We had a very flexible plan for the six-day trip, not even having booked any overnight accommodation. We figured that finding a place to commune with Uncle Morpheus every night would not be a problem because all the kids were at school. As it turned out we did not have to spend a night trying to kip in the Pajero – my snoring would have driven Jeremy nuts ... Friday 3 November The main purpose of the trip was to survey two quadrants for the Karoo BioGaps Project. One of these was on the farm Lushof, 10 km west of Loxton, and the other was Taaiboschkloof, about 50 km south-east of Loxton. The 1 000 km drive, via Kimberley, to Loxton was accompanied by hot and windy weather. The temperature hit 38 degrees and was 33 when the sun hit the horizon at 6 pm.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Gambia (Western Africa)
    ANNALS OF THE UPPER SILESIAN MUSEUM IN BYTOM ENTOMOLOGY Vol. 26 (online 010): 1–13 ISSN 0867-1966, eISSN 2544-039X (online) Bytom, 08.05.2018 LECH BOROWIEC1, SEBASTIAN SALATA2 Notes on ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Gambia (Western Africa) http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1243767 1 Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Taxonomy, University of Wrocław, Przybyszewskiego 65, 51-148 Wrocław, Poland e-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: A list of 35 ant species or morphospecies collected in Gambia is presented, 9 of them are recorded for the first time from the country:Camponotus cf. vividus, Crematogaster cf. aegyptiaca, Dorylus nigricans burmeisteri SHUCKARD, 1840, Lepisiota canescens (EMERY, 1897), Monomorium cf. opacum, Monomorium cf. salomonis, Nylanderia jaegerskioeldi (MAYR, 1904), Technomyrmex pallipes (SMITH, 1876), and Trichomyrmex abyssinicus (FOREL, 1894). A checklist of 82 ant species recorded from Gambia is given. Key words: ants, faunistics, Gambia, new country records. INTRODUCTION Ants fauna of Gambia (West Africa) is poorly known. Literature data, AntWeb and other Internet resources recorded only 59 species from this country. For comparison from Senegal, which surrounds three sides of Gambia, 89 species have been recorded so far. Both of these records seem poor when compared with 654 species known from the whole western Africa (SHUCKARD 1840, ANDRÉ 1889, EMERY 1892, MENOZZI 1926, SANTSCHI 1939, LUSH 2007, ANTWIKI 2017, ANTWEB 2017, DIAMÉ et al. 2017, TAYLOR 2018). Most records from Gambia come from general web checklists of species. Unfortunately, they lack locality data, date of sampling, collector name, coordinates of the locality and notes on habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Seismic Reflection Survey and Well Drilling, Umkhanyakude District Municipality, Northern Kzn
    SFG1897 v2 Public Disclosure Authorized ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT SEISMIC REFLECTION SURVEY AND WELL DRILLING, UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT MUNICIPALITY, NORTHERN KZN Public Disclosure Authorized Client: SANEDI–SACCCS Consultant: G.A. Botha (PhD, Pr.Sci.Nat) in association with specialist consultants; Brousse-James and Associates, WetRest, Jeffares & Green, S. Allan Council for Geoscience, P.O. Box 900, Pietermaritzburg, 3200 Council for Geoscience report: 2016-0009 June, 2016 Copyright © Council for Geoscience, 2016 Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................... vii 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2 Project description ................................................................................................................................ 4 2.1 Location and regional context ....................................................................................................... 5 2.2 2D seismic reflection survey and well drilling; project description and technical aspects ............ 7 2.2.1 Seismic survey (vibroseis) process ....................................................................................... 7 2.2.2 Well drilling ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier Area, Swellendam
    Biodiversity and Ecology of Critically Endangered, Rûens Silcrete Renosterveld in the Buffeljagsrivier area, Swellendam by Johannes Philippus Groenewald Thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters in Science in Conservation Ecology in the Faculty of AgriSciences at Stellenbosch University Supervisor: Prof. Michael J. Samways Co-supervisor: Dr. Ruan Veldtman December 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration I hereby declare that the work contained in this thesis, for the degree of Master of Science in Conservation Ecology, is my own work that have not been previously published in full or in part at any other University. All work that are not my own, are acknowledge in the thesis. ___________________ Date: ____________ Groenewald J.P. Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved ii Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Acknowledgements Firstly I want to thank my supervisor Prof. M. J. Samways for his guidance and patience through the years and my co-supervisor Dr. R. Veldtman for his help the past few years. This project would not have been possible without the help of Prof. H. Geertsema, who helped me with the identification of the Lepidoptera and other insect caught in the study area. Also want to thank Dr. K. Oberlander for the help with the identification of the Oxalis species found in the study area and Flora Cameron from CREW with the identification of some of the special plants growing in the area. I further express my gratitude to Dr. Odette Curtis from the Overberg Renosterveld Project, who helped with the identification of the rare species found in the study area as well as information about grazing and burning of Renosterveld.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: Myrmecophilous African Butterflies
    Systematic Entomology (2015), 40, 169–182 DOI: 10.1111/syen.12098 Phylogeny of the Aphnaeinae: myrmecophilous African butterflies with carnivorous and herbivorous life histories JOHN H. BOYLE1,2, ZOFIA A. KALISZEWSKA1,2, MARIANNE ESPELAND1,2,3, TAMARA R. SUDERMAN1,2, JAKE FLEMING2,4, ALAN HEATH5 andNAOMI E. PIERCE1,2 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 2Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, U.S.A., 3Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway, 4Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, U.S.A. and 5Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa Abstract. The Aphnaeinae (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) are a largely African subfamily of 278 described species that exhibit extraordinary life-history variation. The larvae of these butterflies typically form mutualistic associations with ants, and feed on awide variety of plants, including 23 families in 19 orders. However, at least one species in each of 9 of the 17 genera is aphytophagous, parasitically feeding on the eggs, brood or regurgitations of ants. This diversity in diet and type of symbiotic association makes the phylogenetic relations of the Aphnaeinae of particular interest. A phylogenetic hypothesis for the Aphnaeinae was inferred from 4.4 kb covering the mitochondrial marker COI and five nuclear markers (wg, H3, CAD, GAPDH and EF1) for each of 79 ingroup taxa representing 15 of the 17 currently recognized genera, as well as three outgroup taxa. Maximum Parsimony, Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian Inference analyses all support Heath’s systematic revision of the clade based on morphological characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed Expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT)
    Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT) P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected]; [email protected] GPS coordinates UTM X-0593567 & UTM Y- 9586780 PROPOSED EXPANSION OF MOMBASA CEMENT VIPINGO CLINKER AND CEMENT PRODUCTION PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF NO: NEMA/PR/5/2/13,587 Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 P.O. Box 569-80100 Mombasa Kenya 0722 493 772 [email protected] DECEMBER 2015 Compiled by Philip M. Omenge, J. Morumbasi Mong‘oni, & Dr. George Eshiamwta, EIA/EA Lead Experts 2015 Page i Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion MOMBASA CEMENT LTD (VIPINGO UNIT) P.O. BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Email: [email protected]; [email protected] PROPOSED EXPANSION OF MOMBASA CEMENT VIPINGO CLINKER AND CEMENT PRODUCTION PLANT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT STUDY REPORT PROJECT REPORT REF NO: NEMA/PR/5/2/13,587 Compiled by: J.Morumbasi Mong’oni EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No.0357 Philip. Manyi Omenge EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No. 1559 Dr. George Eshiamwata EIA/EA Lead Expert Reg. No 1781 Compiled by Philip M. Omenge, J. Morumbasi Mong‘oni, & Dr. George Eshiamwta, EIA/EA Lead Experts 2015 Page ii Mombasa Cement Ltd Vipingo EIA Study Report for Proposed expansion Environmental Audit Report Submitted by MOMBASA CEMENT LIMITED P.O BOX 83594-80100 MOMBASA Tel 041 3434486 Email: [email protected] HASHUMUKH PATEL .......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Diversification of Chrysoritis Butterflies in the South African Cape
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 148 (2020) 106817 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Recent diversification of Chrysoritis butterflies in the South African Cape (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) T ⁎ ⁎ Gerard Talaveraa,b, ,Zofia A. Kaliszewskab,c, Alan Heathb,d, Naomi E. Pierceb, a Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37, 08003 Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain b Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology and Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, United States c Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States d Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Although best known for its extraordinary radiations of endemic plant species, the South African fynbos is home Butterflies to a great diversity of phytophagous insects, including butterflies in the genus Chrysoritis (Lepidoptera: Chrysoritis Lycaenidae). These butterflies are remarkably uniform morphologically; nevertheless, they comprise 43 cur- Fynbos rently accepted species and 68 currently valid taxonomic names. While many species have highly restricted, dot- Phylogeny like distributions, others are widespread. Here, we investigate the phylogenetic and biogeographic history un- Radiation derlying their diversification by analyzing molecular markers from 406 representatives of all described species Speciation Taxonomy throughout their respective ranges. We recover monophyletic clades for both C. chrysaor and C. thysbe species- groups, and identify a set of lineages that fall between them. The estimated age of divergence for the genus is 32 Mya, and we document significantly rapid diversification of the thysbe species-group in the Pleistocene (~2 Mya).
    [Show full text]
  • Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae): Type Specimens Deposited in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) and a Preliminary Checklist
    Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, B 121 9–18 Wien, Februar 2019 Notes on the ant fauna of Eritrea (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Formicidae): type specimens deposited in the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) and a preliminary checklist M. Madl* Abstract The ant collection of the Natural History Museum Vienna (Austria) contains syntypes of nine species described from Eritrea: Aphaenogaster clavata EMERY, 1877 (= Pheidole clavata (EMERY, 1877)), Cam- ponotus carbo EMERY, 1877, Melissotarsus beccarii EMERY, 1877, Monomorium bicolor EMERY, 1877, Pheidole rugaticeps EMERY, 1877, Pheidole speculifera EMERY, 1877, Polyrhachis antinorii EMERY, 1877 (= Polyrhachis viscosa SMITH, 1858) and Tetramorium doriae EMERY, 1881. All syntypes were collected in Eritrea except the syntype of Monomorium luteum EMERY, 1881, which was collected in Yemen. A prelimi- nary checklist of the ants of Eritrea comprises 114 species and subspecies of seven subfamilies. Zusammenfassung In der Ameisensammlung des Naturhistorischen Museums Wien (Österreich) werden Syntypen von neun Arten aufbewahrt, die aus Eritrea beschrieben worden sind: Aphaenogaster clavata EMERY, 1877 [= Phei- dole clavata (EMERY, 1877)], Camponotus carbo EMERY, 1877, Melissotarsus beccarii EMERY, 1877, Mono- morium bicolor EMERY, 1877, Pheidole rugaticeps EMERY, 1877, Pheidole speculifera EMERY, 1877, Poly- rhachis antinorii EMERY, 1877 (= Polyrhachis viscosa SMITH, 1858) und Tetramorium doriae EMERY, 1881. Alle Syntypen stammen aus Eritrea ausgenommen der Syntypus von Monomorium luteum EMERY, 1881, der in Jemen gesammelt wurde. Eine vorläufige Artenliste der Ameisen Eritreas umfasst 114 Arten und Unterarten aus sieben Unterfamilien. Key words: Formicidae, types, Camponotus, Melissotarsus, Monomorium, Pheidole, Polyrhachis, Tetra- morium, checklist, Eritrea, Yemen. Introduction The study of the ant fauna of Eritrea has been neglected for several decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Secondary Sexual Characters in Aphnaeinae Wings (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae)
    Opusc. Zool. Budapest, 2017, 48(1): 27–34 Male secondary sexual characters in Aphnaeinae wings (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae) 1 2 3 4 5 ZS. BÁLINT , A. HEATH , G. KATONA , K. KERTÉSZ & SZ. SÁFIÁN 1Zsolt Bálint, Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Baross u. 13, H-1088, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 2Alan Heath, Iziko South African Museum, Cape Town, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] 3Katona Gergely, Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Budapest, Baross u. 13, -1088, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 4Krisztián Kertész, Nanostructures Department, Institute of Technical Physics and Materials Sciences, Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, POB 49, H-1515 Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] 5Szabolcs Sáfián, Faculty of Forestry, University of West Hungary, Bajcsy-Zsilinszky u. 4, Sopron H-9400, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Male secondary sexual characters have been discovered on the hindwing verso of genera Aphnaeus Hübner, [1819], Cigaritis Donzel, 1847, Lipaphnaeus Aurivillius, 1916 and Pseudaletis Druce, 1888 representing the Palaeotropical subfamily Aphnaeinae (Lycaenidae: Lepidoptera). Relevant wing parts are illustrated, described, and some observations on the organs are briefly annotated. With an appendix and 14 figures. Keywords. Androconia, hair tuft, classification, Palaeotropics, scaling. INTRODUCTION and Eliot 1990). However, Eliot did not indicate any male secondary sexual characters in this ne of the most characteristic features of Lepi- subfamily, nor did any of the previous or sub- O doptera is the scaled membranous wing sur- sequent workers (eg. Stempffer 1954, Heath 1997, face of the imagines. The scales covering the Libert 2013).
    [Show full text]