DOCSLIB.ORG

United -R of the Interior National Park Service Other Names/Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
United -R of the Interior National Park Service Other Names/Site NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 10024-0018 (Oct. 1990) United l"' ..'''"llrlt ........''' ... -r of the Interior National Park Service This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "X" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter liN/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. historic name _~J:...::o~h~n~~S~t-.:::e:..:::e:...=l:...:::e::.-...!H:.!..o~u=s-.:::e____________________________ _ other names/site number __L_o_m_b_a_r_d-=.y ____________________________ _ street & number ______l_O_l_O_R_i_c_h_a_r_d_S_t_r_e_e_t ___________-ln [.l--J/-I aEl-- o not for publication city or town ________S_a_l_i_s_b_u_r--=-y _________________n-.:/_a __ _ o vicinity state __N_o_r_t_h_C_a_r_o_l_i_n_a __ _ code ~ county __R_o_w_a_n _____ _ code ~ zip code 28144 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this XJ nomination o request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the' property IX] meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant &,)".tio ty ~ sta~e. ally. (. See continuation sheet lor additional comments.) Signature of certifying oHicial State of Federal agency and bureau In my opinion, the property 0 meets 0 does not meet the National Register criteria. (0 See continuation sheet for additional comments.) Signature of certifying oHiciallTitle Date State or Federal agency and bureau 4. National Park Service Certification I hereby certify that the property is: Signature of the Keeper Date of Action o entered in the National Register. o See continuation sheet. o determined eligible for the National Register. o See continuation sheet. o determined not eligible for the National Register. o removed from the National Register. o other, (explain:) ______ John St~ele House Rowan County, North Carolina Name of Property County and State Category of UII'II'\no,rtH Number of Resources within Property (Check as many boxes as apply) (Check only one (Do not include previously listed resources in the count.) GI private [Xl building(s) Contributing Noncontributing public-local district o o ___1_______ 1______ buildings . 0 pUblic-State o site o public-Federal o structure __________________ sites object o ___________1 _______ structures ________________ objects ___1_______ ---=- _____ Total Name of related multiple property listing Number of contributing resources previously listed (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing.) in the National Register N/A o 6. Function or Use Historic Functions Current Functions (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Domestic/single dwelling Domestic/single dwelling 7. Description Architectural Classification Materials (Enter categories from instructions) (Enter categories from instructions) Federal foundation __.>-<S-'"'tw..Qu..n....,.e~ ____________ walls ____--'-W-=o=-=o:....:d:::..J/c...;w--'-e=-a=t=h.=e-=.r....=.b-=o....::.a--=r-=d~ ______ roof __~_~W~o~o~d~/~s~h~l~·n~g~l~e ____________ other _____~B~r~i~c~k~ ___________~ ____ Narrative Description (Describe the historic and current condition of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) See continuation sheet. John Steele House ROI-lan County. North Caro 1 ina Name of Property County and State Applicable National Criteria 'Areas of Significance (Mark "x" in one or more boxes for the criteria qualifying the property (Enter categories from instructions) for National Register listing.) Politics/ L. A Property is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history. 51 B Property is associated with the lives of persons significant in our past. o C Property embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction or represents the work of a master, or possesses high artistic values, or represents a significant and distinguishable entity whose components lack Period of Significance individual distinction. 1799-1815 o Property has yielded, or is likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Criteria Considerations Significant Dates (Mark "x" in all the boxes that apply.) Property is: 1801 [l A owned by a religious institution or used for religious purposes. Significant Person o B removed from its original location. (Complete if Criterion B is marked above) Steele. John DCa birthplace or grave. Cultural Affiliation o 0 a cemetery. N I.A o E a reconstructed building, object, or structure. o F a commemorative property. o G less than 50 years of age or achieved significance ArchitecUBuilder within the past 50 years. Sharpe, Elam--carpenter/bJl;Jder Langdon, John--carpenter Narrative Statement of Significance (Explain the significance of the property on one or more continuation sheets.) 9. Major Bibliographical References Bibilography (Cite the books, articles, and other sources used in preparing this form on one or more continuation sheets.) Previous documentation on file (NPS): Primary location of additional data: o preliminary determination of individual listing (36 U State Historic Preservation Office CFR 67) has been requested o Other State agency o previously listed in the National Register o Federal agency o previously determined eligible by the National o Local government Register o University o designated a National Historic Landmark o Other o recorded by Historic American Buildings Survey Name of repository: #-------------------- o recorded by Historic American Engifleering Record # _____________----,--_ John Steele House Rowan County, North Carolina Name of Property County and State iF"fl'il:~'::lIf"jIQ of Property Approx. 1.0 acres UTM References (Place additional UTM references on a continuation sheet.) 3 W I I I I Easting Northing Zone Easting Northing L--I,"-I ,"-,"-,---,---,I I I 4 W I I I I I I I o See continuation sheet Verbal Boundary Description (Describe the boundaries of the property on a continuation sheet.) Boundary Justification (Explain why the boundaries were selected on a continuation sheet.) 11. Form Prepared By name/title __......LD..ua:L'-"-:,yf-U-d--L...F-'-ou:aLir-l.d.L-JHu.-oU-Uo-ud _______________________________ organization ________________________ date __1_7'--r_la_y-'--_1-=...9-'C- 9_4______ _ street & number Isinglass, 6·907 Old Shelby Road telephone ___7_0_4 _I4_6_2_-_4_3_3_1 __ _ city or town __---'-V-'""a...J.J,-'-e~ _______'_ ___________ state _=N-=C ____ zip code 28168 Additional Documentation Submit the following items with the'completed form: Continuation Sheets Maps A USGS map (7.5 or 15 minute series) indicating the property's location. A Sketch map for historic districts and properties having large acreage or numerous resources. Photographs Representative black and white photographs of the property. Additional items (Check with the SHPO or FPO for any additional items) name ____________E_d_w_a_r_d __ H_._C_I_e_ffi_e_n_t ________ ---------------- street & number 310 South Ell is Street telephone 704 1636-3452 North Carolina city or town Salisbury state zip code 28144 Paperwork Reduction Act Statement: This information is being collected for applications to the National Register of Historic Places to nominate properties for listing or determine eligibility for listing, to list properties, and to amend existing listings. Response to this request is required to obtain a benefit in accordance with the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended (16 U.S.C. 470 at seq.). Estimated Burden Statement: Public reporting burden for this form is estimated to average 18.1 hours per response including time for reviewing instruc~ions, gathering and maintaining data, and completing and reviewing the form. Direct comments regarding this burden estimate or any aspect of this form to the Chief, Administrative Services Division, National Park Service, P.O. Box 37127, Washington, DC 20013-7127; and the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reductio'ns Projects (1024-0018), Washington; DC 20503. NPS Form 10-900-a - OMS Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) n"'''fI'ln~ number ~ __ John Steele House, Rowan County, N.C. John Steele House Rowan County, North Carolina National Significance Criterion: Theme: Political and Military Affairs--1783-1860 Subthemes: Early Federal Period (1789-1800) The Jeffersonian Period (1800-1811) Period of National Significance: 1799-1815 The case for the national significance of the John Steele House is developed in Part Eight of the National Register nomination, "The Life and Political Significance of John Steele." NPS Form 10-900-a OMS Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) John Steele House, Rowan County, N.C. Architectural Description General Physical Description: The John Steele House is a two-story with attic weatherboarded frame Federal
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2001 North Carolina Women's Soccer • Page 78
    History tistry, medicine, pharmacy and law. Five health schools -- Students Carolina was the nation’s first state university to open its which, with UNC Hospitals, comprise one of the nation’s Recent freshman classes at Carolina have set new standards doors and the only public university to award degrees in the most complete academic medical centers -- are integrated of excellence as measured by the rigorous coursework stu- 18th century. with liberal arts, basic sciences and high-tech academic dents have taken, as well as their grades and SAT scores. Authorized by the N.C. Constitution in 1776, the universi- programs. The incoming freshmen of 2001 are continuing that trend. ty was chartered by the N.C. General Assembly Dec. 11, In fall 2000, Carolina enrolled 24,872 students from all 100 Besides setting a new record for high school preparation, 1789, the same year George Washington first was inaugu- North Carolina counties, the other 49 states and nearly 100 the newest class will become the very best group of first- rated as president. other countries. Eighty-two percent of Carolina’s 15,608 year students Carolina has ever admitted. The cornerstone was laid for Old East, the nation’s first undergraduates were from North Carolina. Sixty-three per- state university building, Oct. 12, 1793. Hinton James, the cent of Carolina’s students were undergraduates, 28 percent UNC students have a long tradition of outstanding achieve- first student, arrived from Wilmington, N.C., Feb. 12, 1795. ment. Thirty-five have been awarded the Rhodes Location Scholarship since it was created in 1902, including the first The 729-acre central campus includes the two oldest state U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccorkle PLACE
    CHAPTER EIGHT: McCORKLE PLACE McCorkle Place is said to be the most densely memorialized piece of real estate in North Carolina.501 On the University’s symbolic front lawn, there are almost a dozen monuments and memorials fundamental to the University’s lore and traditions, but only two monuments within the space have determined the role of McCorkle Place as a space for racial justice movements.502 The Unsung Founders Memorial and the University’s Confederate Monument were erected on the oldest quad of the campus almost a century apart for dramatically different memorial purposes. The former honors the enslaved and freed Black persons who “helped build” the University, while the latter commemorated, until its toppling in August 2018, “the sons of the University who entered the war of 1861-65.”503 Separated by only a few dozen yards, the physical distinctions between the two monuments were, before the Confederate Monument was toppled, quite striking. The Unsung 501 Johnathan Michels, “Who Gets to be Remembered In Chapel Hill?,” Scalawag Magazine, 8 October 2016, <https://www.scalawagmagazine.org/2016/10/whats-in-a-name/>. 502 Timothy J. McMillan, “Remembering Forgetting: A Monument to Erasure at the University of North Carolina,” in Silence, Screen and Spectacle: Rethinking Social Memory in the Age of Information, ed. Lindsay A. Freeman, Benjamin Nienass, and Rachel Daniell, 137-162, (Berghahn Book: New York, New York, 2004): 139-142; Other memorials and sites of memory within McCorkle Place include the Old Well, the Davie Poplar, Old East, the Caldwell Monument, a Memorial to Founding Trustees, and the Speaker Ban Monument.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation for the Disposition and Preservation of the Confederate Monument
    Recommendation for the Disposition and Preservation of the Confederate Monument A Four-Part Plan presented by UNC-Chapel Hill to the UNC Board of Governors Appendices TABLE OF CONTENTS A-1: Executive Summary of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Public Safety Panel Report. ..................... 3 A-2: Summary of Safety and Security Considerations ......... 6 B: Letter from the North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources ................................... 10 C: Campus Map ................................................................. 11 D: Legal Considerations ..................................................... 12 E: Requested Cost Estimates .............................................15 F: Work of the Chancellor’s Task Force on UNC Chapel Hill History ...........................................28 G-1: Site Evaluation ........................................................... 31 G-2: Summary of Possible Sites for Disposition of Confederate Monument ......................... 38 H: Summary of Community and Public Input ..................... 52 Appendix A-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL PUBLIC SAFETY PANEL REPORT This is an executive summary of the Report of a five-person expert Panel (the “Panel”) convened by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (“UNC-CH”) to assess the security and public safety issues associated with the “Silent Sam” civil war monument (the “Monument”). This Panel consisted of five security professionals led by Chris Swecker, Attorney at Law and former FBI Assistant Director. Other members include Jane Perlov, who has served as NYPD Chief of Detectives, Queens, Secretary of Public Safety, Commonwealth of Mass. and Chief of Police in Raleigh N.C.; Louis Quijas, former FBI Assistant Director and Chief of Police, High Point, N.C.; Johnny Jennings, Deputy Chief of Police, Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department (CMPD); and Edward Reeder, Major General US Army Special Forces Command (Ret.) and CEO of Five Star Global Security.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of North Carolina GENERAL ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE BOX 2688, CHAPEL HILL, NC 27515-2688
    The University of North Carolina GENERAL ADMINISTRATION POST OFFICE BOX 2688, CHAPEL HILL, NC 27515-2688 ROBERT O. NELSON, Vice President for Finance Telephone: (919) 962-4598 • Fax: (919) 962-0008 • E-mail: [email protected] Appalachian State November 26, 2007 University East Carolina Members of the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations University Senator Marc Basnight, Co-Chair Elizabeth City President Pro Tempore State University Representative Joe Hackney, Co-Chair Fayetteville State Speaker of the House of Representatives University North Carolina Fiscal Research Division Agricultural and Lynn Muchmore, Director Technical State Richard Bostic University Jim Klingler North Carolina Central University Subject: Allocations for Repairs and Renovations North Carolina School of In the 2007 Session (S.L. 2007-323), the General Assembly appropriated $145,000,000 the Arts for the Statewide Reserve for Repairs and Renovations Account, allocated 46% (or North Carolina $66,700,000) of this Reserve to the Board of Governors of The University of North State University Carolina and directed that the subsequent allocations by the Board of Governors be at Raleigh reviewed by the Joint Legislative Commission on Governmental Operations and the University of Fiscal Research Division of the Legislative Services Office. The purpose of this report is North Carolina at Asheville to facilitate that review. University of At its August 15, 2007 meeting, the Board of Governors allocated its funding in North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    [Show full text]
  • Onetouch 4.6 Scanned Documents
    TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1. Native Empires in the Old Southwest . 20 2. Early Native Settlers in the Southwest . 48 3. Anglo-American Settlers in the Southwest . 76 4. Early Federal Removal Policies . 110 5. Removal Policies in Practice Before 1830 . 140 6. The Federal Indian Commission and the U.S. Dragoons in Indian Territory . .181 7. A Commission Incomplete: The Treaty of Camp Holmes . 236 8. Trading Information: The Chouteau Brothers and Native Diplomacy . 263 Introduction !2 “We presume that our strength and their weakness is now so visible, that they must see we have only to shut our hand to crush them” - Thomas Jefferson to William Henry Harrison, February 27, 1803 Colonel Henry Dodge of the U.S. dragoons waited nervously at the bottom of a high bluff on the plains of what is now southwestern Oklahoma. A Comanche man on a white horse was barreling down the bluff toward Dodge and the remnants of the dragoon company that stood waiting with him. For weeks the dragoons had been wandering around the southern plains, hoping to meet the Comanches and impress them with the United States’ military might. However, almost immediately after the dragoon company of 500 men had departed from Fort Gibson in June 1834, they were plagued by a feverish illness and suffered from the lack of adequate provisions and potable water. When General Henry Leavenworth, the group’s leader, was taken ill near the Washita River, Dodge took command, pressing forward in the July heat with about one-fifth of the original force. The Comanche man riding swiftly toward Dodge was part of a larger group that the dragoons had spotted earlier on the hot July day.
    [Show full text]
  • UNC Parking Zone Map UNC Transportation & Parking
    UNC Parking Zone Map UNC Transportation & Parking Q R S T U V W X Y Z A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P 26 **UNC LEASES SPACE CAROLINA . ROAD IN THESE BUILDINGS 21 21 MT HOMESTEAD NORTH LAND MGMT. PINEY OPERATIONS CTR. VD. (NC OFFICE HORACE WILLIAMS AIRPORT VD., HILL , JR. BL “RR” 41 1 1 Resident 41 CommuterRR Lot R12 UNC VD AND CHAPEL (XEROX) TE 40 MLK BL A PRINTING RIVE EXTENSION MLK BL ESTES D SERVICES TIN LUTHER KING TERST PLANT N O I AHEC T EHS HOMESTEAD ROAD MAR HANGER VD. 86) O I-40 STORAGE T R11 TH (SEE OTHER MAPS) 22 22 O 720, 725, & 730 MLK, JR. BL R1 T PHYSICAL NOR NORTH STREET ENVRNMEN HL .3 MILES TO TH. & SAFETY ESTES DRIVE 42 COMMUTER LOT T. 42 ER NC86 ELECTRICAL DISTRICENTBUTION OPERATIONS SURPLUS WA REHOUSE N1 ST GENERAL OREROOM 2 23 23 2 R1 CHAPEL HILL ES MLK JR. BOULE NORTH R1 ARKING ARD ILITI R1 / R2OVERFLOW ZONEP V VICES C R A F SHOPS GY SE EY 43 RN 43 ENERBUILDING CONSTRUCTION PRITCHARD STREET R1 NC 86 CHURCH STREET . HO , JR. BOULE ES F R1 / V STREET SER L BUILDING VICE ARD A ST ATIO GI EET N TR AIRPOR R2 S T DRIVE IN LUTHER KING BRANCH T L MAR HIL TH WEST ROSEMARY STREET EAST ROSEMARY STREET L R ACILITIES DRIVE F A NO 24 STUDRT 24 TH COLUMBI IO CHAPE R ADMINIST OFF R NO BUILDINGICE ATIVE R10 1700 N9 MLK 208 WEST 3 N10 FRANKLIN ST.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina Digital Collections
    North Carolina suggestions for apply- ing the social studies ©IiF IGtbrarg nf thf llntorsitij nf Nnrtlt (Uarnlttia Plyilantltrnjiif ^nmtira NORTH CAROLINA SUGGESTIONS FOR APPLYING THE SOCIAL STUDIES Issued by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction Raleigh, North Carolina THE STATE FLAG The model of the flag as used today was adopted in 188 5. It consists of a blue union containing in the center thereof a white star with the letter N in gilt on the left and the letter C in gilt on the right of the star. The fly of the flag consists of two equally proportional bars, the upper bar red and the lower bar white. The length of these bars is equal to the perpendicular length of the union, and the total length of the flag is one-third more than its width. Above the star in the center of the union is a gilt scroll in semi-circular form, containing in black the inscription: "May 20, 1775," and below the star is a similar scroll containing the inscription: "April 12, 1776." This first date was placed on the flag to mark the signing of the Mecklenburg Declaration of Independence. The second date marks the day on which the Halifax Convention empowered the North Carolina members of the Continental Congress to concur with the delegates of the other colo- nies in declaring independence. Publication No. 217 NORTH CAROLINA SUGGESTIONS FOR APPLYING THE SOCIAL STUDIES Issued by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction Raleigh, North Carolina 1939 Bayard Wootten. HAYES The former home of Samuel Johnston, Revolutionary leader, Governor, and United States Senator, is located at Edenton.
    [Show full text]
  • North Carolina's Federalists in an Evolving Public
    NORTH CAROLINA’S FEDERALISTS IN AN EVOLVING PUBLIC SPHERE, 1790-1810 Scott King-Owen A Thesis Submitted to the University of North Carolina at Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of History University of North Carolina at Wilmington 2006 Approved by Advisory Committee _______Dr. Chris Fonvielle_______ _________Dr. Paul Townend__________ __________Dr. Alan Watson________ Chair Accepted by ______________________________ Dean, Graduate School TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT.......................................................................................................................iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................. iv DEDICATION.................................................................................................................... v LIST OF TABLES............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................................... vii INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER 1 – NORTH CAROLINA AND ITS FEDERALIST LEADERSHIP........... 16 CHAPTER 2 – PRESS AND PUBLIC IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY................. 44 CHAPTER 3 – WILLIAM BOYLAN, FEDERALIST PARTISAN ............................... 68 CHAPTER 4 – THE WAR OF THE EDITORS .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The North Carolina Historical Review
    The North Carolina Historical Review Volume XIV April, 1937 Number 2 CHILD-LABOR REFORMS IN NORTH CAROLINA SINCE 1903 By Elizabeth Huey Davidson In 1903 North Carolina adopted its first child-labor law. It was a weak measure, forbidding the employment of children un- der twelve in factories, establishing a maximum of sixty-six hours a week for persons under eighteen, and providing no machinery for enforcement of the law. The passage of this measure had resulted from a slow growth of sentiment against the evils of child labor, and its terms represented a compromise between the reformers and the cotton manufacturers of the State. There was no organization to push further legislation, however, until the formation of the National Child Labor Com- mittee in 1904. This committee was largely inspired by the work of Dr. Edgar Gardner Murphy of Montgomery, Alabama, and had at first a number of prominent Southerners on its mem- bership roll. For its Southern secretary the committee chose Dr. Alexander J. McKelway, a Presbyterian clergyman of Char- lotte, North Carolina. The law of 1903 had been in effect a year when the committee attempted to reopen the drive for legislation. Its effectiveness in that length of time cannot be judged accurately, since the re- port of the Commissioner of Labor for 1904 fails to record the number of children employed in manufacturing. 1 The general consensus of opinion expressed by the manufacturers to the com- missioner was that the law should be accepted in good faith, but that it should also be the last one of its kind.
    [Show full text]
  • Garner, Ncrth Carolina A.B., Pfeiffer College, 1970 a Thesis
    'J1ff� ImJ(J'h CAEvLIUA COlJ}./l'I11.'u'I'ICI:.A.L CONV.tJf2ION OF 1835 Boyd Dale Cathey Garner, Ncrth Carolina A.B., Pfeiffer College, 1970 A Thesis Presented to the Gruduete :E'acult,:r of :.he Un:L v,0rsity cf Virginia in Candid8cJ for tha Degree of Master of Arts Corcoran Department of History University of Virgin�.a June 1971 CONTENTS The Paper 1 A. Coming of the Convention. • J_ B. Convention: Race . .15 C. Convention: Representation . .25 D. Convention: Religion . .35 E. Convention: Conclusion . ••50 F. Epilogue. .59 Appendices A. Maps of North Carolina. 63 B. Chart of County Formation . .64 C. Population of North Carolina, 1790-1860 . .65 D. Population of North Carolina in the Twenty-five Counties with the Highest Concentration of Free Negroes, 1830 . .65 E. Slave and White Population Cha�ges in Western North Carolina, 1790-1860 . • .66 F. Votes Tabulations . ..67 G. Directory of Delegates to the Convention of 1835. .68 Bibliography. .79 COMING OF TIIE CONVENTION In 1835 North Carolina revised its constitution. The fifty-nine year old document which underwent modification had been the product of the Revolutionary outpouring of 1776. Like the constitutions of other American states the North Carolina constitution had embodied the Whig idea of "balanced" govern­ ment.1 Richard Caswell, James Iredell, Samuel Johnston, and Willie Jones, representing all shades of Patriot opinion, had had a hand in shaping it. In the best Whig tradition, property was weighed in a Polybian fashion in the two houses of the General Assembly. Franchised freeholders were required to possess sLable residence and adequate property as an assurance of the voter's character and attachment to the corn.munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal 18,1
    THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR SPRING JOURNAL2013 IN THIS ISSUE Call 4All—The Opportunity and Need for Pro Bono Service page 12 “So, How Much is My Case Worth?” page 18 Meet the Federal Judges—Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. page 22 THE NORTH CAROLINA STATE BAR JOURNAL Spring 2013 FEATURES Volume 18, Number 1 12 Call 4All—The Opportunity and Editor Need for Pro Bono Service Jennifer R. Duncan By Debbie Hildebran-Bachofen Publications Committee 14 “[A]lmost Nothing in Ready G. Gray Wilson, Chair Dorothy Bernholz, Vice-Chair Change”—The 19th Century Law Lauren Collins Practice of David Swain Harry B. Crow Margaret H. Dickson By Willis P. Whichard Rebecca Eggers-Gryder Forrest A. Ferrell 18“So, How Much is My Case Worth?” Douglas R. Gill By Shannon B. English James W. Hall Anna Hamrick Charles Hardee 22 Meet the Federal Judges—Judge Darrin D. Jordan Max O. Cogburn Jr. Sonya C. McGraw By Michelle Rippon Robert Montgomery Nancy Black Norelli Harold (Butch) Pope 24Lobsters and Lawyers: Barbara B. Weyher Professionalism and Our Alan D. Woodlief Jr. Shared Capital By Woody Connette © Copyright 2013 by the North Carolina State Bar. All rights reserved. Periodicals postage paid at Raleigh, NC, 26The Liar’s Paradox and additional offices. Opinions expressed by contributors By Gary Brian Ernst Jr. are not necessarily those of the North Carolina State Bar. 2012 Fiction Writing Competition POSTMASTER: Send address changes to the North Third Prize Winner Carolina State Bar, PO Box 25908, Raleigh, NC 27611. The North Carolina Bar Journal invites the submission of unsolicited, original articles, essays, and book reviews.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School Fall 11-12-1992 Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830 Cynthia Diane Earman Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Earman, Cynthia Diane, "Boardinghouses, Parties and the Creation of a Political Society: Washington City, 1800-1830" (1992). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 8222. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/8222 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BOARDINGHOUSES, PARTIES AND THE CREATION OF A POLITICAL SOCIETY: WASHINGTON CITY, 1800-1830 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of History by Cynthia Diane Earman A.B., Goucher College, 1989 December 1992 MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the Master's and Doctor's Degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Libraries are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author. Bibliographical references may be noted, but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission. Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work. A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele is expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above restrictions.
    [Show full text]