Quails in Mid-Northern South Australia L
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Recommended Band Size List Page 1
Jun 00 Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme - Recommended Band Size List Page 1 Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme Recommended Band Size List - Birds of Australia and its Territories Number 24 - May 2000 This list contains all extant bird species which have been recorded for Australia and its Territories, including Antarctica, Norfolk Island, Christmas Island and Cocos and Keeling Islands, with their respective RAOU numbers and band sizes as recommended by the Australian Bird and Bat Banding Scheme. The list is in two parts: Part 1 is in taxonomic order, based on information in "The Taxonomy and Species of Birds of Australia and its Territories" (1994) by Leslie Christidis and Walter E. Boles, RAOU Monograph 2, RAOU, Melbourne, for non-passerines; and “The Directory of Australian Birds: Passerines” (1999) by R. Schodde and I.J. Mason, CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, for passerines. Part 2 is in alphabetic order of common names. The lists include sub-species where these are listed on the Census of Australian Vertebrate Species (CAVS version 8.1, 1994). CHOOSING THE CORRECT BAND Selecting the appropriate band to use combines several factors, including the species to be banded, variability within the species, growth characteristics of the species, and band design. The following list recommends band sizes and metals based on reports from banders, compiled over the life of the ABBBS. For most species, the recommended sizes have been used on substantial numbers of birds. For some species, relatively few individuals have been banded and the size is listed with a question mark. In still other species, too few birds have been banded to justify a size recommendation and none is made. -
Partridges, Quails, Pheasants and Turkeys Phasianidae Vigors, 1825: Zoological Journal 2: 402 – Type Genus Phasianus Linnaeus, 1758
D .W . .5 / DY a 5D t w[ { wt Ç"" " !W5 í ÇI &'(' / b ù b a L w 5 ! ) " í "* " Ç t+ t " h " * { b ù" t* &)/&0 Order GALLIFORMES: Game Birds and Allies The order of galliform taxa in Checklist Committee (1990) appears to have been based on Peters (1934). Johnsgard (1986) synthesised available data, came up with similar groupings of taxa, and produced a dendrogram indicating that turkeys (Meleagridinae) were the most primitive (outside Cracidae and Megapodiidae), with grouse (Tetraoninae), guineafowl (Numidinae), New World quails (Odontophorinae) and pheasants and kin (Phasianinae) successively more derived. Genetic evidence (DNA-hybridisation data) provided by Sibley & Ahlquist (1990) suggested Odontophorinae were the most basal phasianoids and guineafowl the next most basal group. A basal position of the New World quails among phasianoids has been supported by other genetic data (Kimball et al. 1999, Armstrong et al. 2001). A recent analysis based on morphological characters (Dyke et al. 2003) found support for megapodes as the most basal group in the order, then Cracidae, then Phasianidoidea, and within the latter, Numididae the most basal group. In contrast to the above genetic-based analyses, Dyke et al. (2003) found the Odontophorinae to be the most derived group within the order. A recent analysis using both mitochondrial ND2 and cytochrome-b DNA sequences, however, reinforces the basal position of the Odontophorinae (Pereira & Baker 2006). Here we follow a consensus of the above works and place Odontophorinae basal in the phasianids. Worthy & Holdaway (2002) considered that Cheeseman’s (1891) second-hand record of megapodes from Raoul Island, Kermadec Group, before the 1870 volcanic eruption has veracity. -
Alectoris Chukar
PEST RISK ASSESSMENT Chukar partridge Alectoris chukar (Photo: courtesy of Olaf Oliviero Riemer. Image from Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons Attribution License, Version 3.) March 2011 This publication should be cited as: Latitude 42 (2011) Pest Risk Assessment: Chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar). Latitude 42 Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd. Hobart, Tasmania. About this Pest Risk Assessment This pest risk assessment is developed in accordance with the Policy and Procedures for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Vertebrate Wildlife in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2011). The policy and procedures set out conditions and restrictions for the importation of controlled animals pursuant to s32 of the Nature Conservation Act 2002. For more information about this Pest Risk Assessment, please contact: Wildlife Management Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Address: GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia. Phone: 1300 386 550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Disclaimer The information provided in this Pest Risk Assessment is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this Pest Risk Assessment and/or reliance on its availability at any time. Pest Risk Assessment: Chukar partridge Alectoris chukar 2/20 1. Summary The chukar partridge (Alectoris chukar) is native to the mountainous regions of Asia, Western Europe and the Middle East (Robinson 2007, Wikipedia 2009). Its natural range includes Turkey, the Mediterranean islands, Iran and east through Russia and China and south into Pakistan and Nepal (Cowell 2008). -
Scientists Nail Quail Mystery 23 October 2009
Scientists nail quail mystery 23 October 2009 found quail on Tiritiri Matangi to be genetically identical to the Australian brown quail. As a result of the study, some museums around the world will have to rename their exhibits of quail, with Coturnix pectoralis (Australian stubble quail) previously labelled as Coturnix novaezelandiae. The New Zealand quail was once widespread throughout the country but declined rapidly in the mid-1800s as a result of large-scale deforestation and predation by dogs, cats and rats, and was declared extinct by 1875. The Australian brown quail was introduced as a game bird to replace it. Specimen of an extinct New Zealand quail in the Paris As well as clearing up an enduring mystery over the Museum of Natural History. identity of quails on the island, Mr Seabrook- Davison's research findings open up another debate on the role of introduced species in New Zealand. (PhysOrg.com) -- A Massey biology researcher has used DNA analysis to prove quail on Tiritiri Unlike the 70 million Australian possums that Matangi Island are Australian and not remnants of devastate native forests, and harm bird and insect an extinct New Zealand species. species, the quail could prove beneficial to our forests as an "ecological engineer" by tilling leaf PhD researcher Mark Seabrook-Davison from the litter and distributing seeds, he says. Institute of Natural Sciences at Albany says the introduced bird could enhance our forests if "The main reasons are that it is similar to the extinct allowed to thrive in other regions. New Zealand quail and appears to benefit an ecosystem and has no detrimental impact on Mr Seabrook-Davison, who has just completed his threatened native species. -
Coturnix Ypsilophora Brown Quail
BIRD Coturnix ypsilophora Brown Quail AUS SA AMLR Endemism Residency throughout the region from One Tree Hill in the north to Port Elliot in the south and from Onkaparinga in the - V V - Nomadic west to Callington in the east.3 Pre-1983 AMLR filtered records indicate few occurrences; most in the Adelaide metropolitan area and one in the Willunga area.3 In the MLR it was once ‘often seen’ but now occurs irregularly. The movement of the species into SA is poorly understood, but influxes from outside SA occur irregularly, with populations persisting for several years at favoured sites (G. Carpenter pers. comm.). Habitat Cryptic species that occurs in dense crops (especially oats), irrigated pastures, rank grasslands and sedgelands, especially where native species predominate, and often bordering swamps (G. Photo: © Brian Furby Carpenter pers. comm.). Conservation Significance The AMLR distribution is part of a limited extant Prefers dense grasslands, often on the edges of open 1 distribution in adjacent regions within SA. The species forests and bracken. has been described as 'probably declining' within the AMLR.2 Within the AMLR the species’ relative area of Within the AMLR the preferred broad vegetation occupancy is classified as ‘Extremely Restricted’. groups are Grassland, Grassy Woodland and 3 Relative to all AMLR extant species, the species' Wetland. taxonomic uniqueness is classified as ‘High’.3 Biology and Ecology Description Feeds in the early morning or evening, on the ground, Small, plump ground-dwelling bird, variable in colour, mainly on seeds and green shoots, but also on insects. 1 ranging from red brown to grey brown with fine white In some areas, quails will feed along roadsides. -
Females of Rhe Australian Orrue Euail,, Phasianidae (Euail with Hind
The Australiqn Bird Bander December,1967 Females orrue of rhe Australian euail,, Phasianidae(euail with hind toel). by H' 1. de s. Disney and Drawings by SondraBeresford, Austrarian Museum, sydney. !:: ::r :: : n! ailI : :::::::::!:!tl:ti i I' l: " 'li FEMALE STUBBLE QUAIL FEIUALE BROWN QUAIL FEMALE KING QUAIL STUBBLE QUAIL BROWN QUAIL 86 l The Australian Bird Bander December,1967 STUBBLE (Coturnix QUAIL per:roralis) Mantle and Back: White centre shafts 'square' to feathers with large black spots and narrower Female pale rufous bars. Length:7-7* inches(180-185 mm). Throat and Chin: Whitish buff. Primarics: Outer two equal in length and the next Rest of Underparts: Buff with dark brown bars almost the same tength (this applies with the each side ol' narrow white shaft. male also). Leg colour: Fleshy white. KING QUAIL (Excallactoria chinensis) Bitl (cutmen):Usually 12 mm (range 10-13; 20 measured). FemaIe Wing (flattened):Usual range 99-105 mm. Length: 4*-5 inches (108-127 mm). Line over eye: Well marked white stripe extend_ Primaries: The outer primaries vary in length ing to sides of neck. sometimesbeing similar to the StirUbleeJait and at other trmes similar to the Brown euail. Mantle and Back Large creamy buff spear_ This maybe a question of age. shapedcentres to feathers. Leg colour: Bright yellow. Throaf and Chin: Whitish, sometimeswith slieht spotting. BilI^(culmen):Usually 9-10 mm (range 9_l I mnr; l2 measured). Rest of Underparts Whitish buff streaked with Wing (flattened): dark brown. Usual range 65_74 mm. ^The p_luntagepattern of..the u_pp-erand under parls of the ^femaleRing euail is .iiriiir.-i" t-lrai ot tt" Brown Quail. -
Birds of Waite Conservation Reserve
BIRDS OF WAITE CONSERVATION RESERVE Taxonomic order & nomenclature follow Menkhorst P, Rogers D, Clarke R, Davies J, Marsack P, & Franklin K. 2017. The Australian Bird Guide. CSIRO Publishing. Anatidae Australian Wood Duck Chenonetta jubata R Pacific Black Duck Anas superciliosa R Phasianidae Stubble Quail Coturnix pectoralis R Brown Quail Coturnix ypsilophora V Ardeidae White-faced Heron Egretta novaehollandiae V Pelecanidae Australian Pelican Pelecanus conspicillatus V Accipitridae Black-shouldered Kite Elanus axillaris R Square-tailed Kite Lophoictinia isura R Little Eagle Hieraaetus morphnoides V Wedge-tailed Eagle Aquila audax R Brown Goshawk Accipiter fasciatus U Collared Sparrowhawk Accipiter cirrocephalus R Spotted Harrier Circus assimilis V Whistling Kite Haliastur sphenurus V Turnicidae Little Button-quail Turnix velox V Columbidae Feral Pigeon (Rock Dove) *Columba livia C Spotted Dove *Spilopelia chinensis R Common Bronzewing Phaps chalcoptera U Crested Pigeon +Ocyphaps lophotes C Cuculidae Horsfield’s Bronze Cuckoo Chalcites basalis R Fan-tailed Cuckoo Cacomantis flabelliformis R Tytonidae Eastern Barn Owl Tyto delicatula V Strigidae Southern Boobook Ninox boobook C Podargidae Tawny Frogmouth Podargus strigoides C Alcedinidae Laughing Kookaburra Dacelo novaeguineae C Falconidae Nankeen Kestrel Falco cenchroides R Australian Hobby Falco longipennis R Brown Falcon Falco berigora V Peregrine Falcon Falco peregrinus U Cacatuidae Yellow-tailed Black-Cockatoo Calyptorhynchus funereus C Galah Eolophus roseicapilla C Long-billed Corella -
A Comparative Study of the Energetics of Avian Reproduction
S.5 'ats A Comparative Study of the Energetics of Avian Reproduction by James Todd Pearson B.Sc (Hons) Adelaide This thesis is presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Adelaide Departmentof Znology Universityof Adelaide L994 /\*,on.\e.l ï.\.1 j Summary The growth and development of precocial king quail (-'chinese painted quail'; Coturnix chinensis) and altricial cockatiel (Nymphicus hollandiczs) is examined during embryonic and posthaûching periods up until fledging. Both species lay relatively small eggs (4.9 and 5.9 g respectively), which hatch after 16.5 and I9-2I days respectively. After hatching, the quail is independent of the parents, except for parental brooding, but the cockatiel is totally dependent on the parents for food and brooding. The male quail does not incubate the eggs, whereas the male cockatiel incubates, and both quail and cockatiel parents brood chicks. However, the patterns of parental attentiveness during the brooding period is different between the two species. Quail chicks must forage in order to feed, and return to parents for brooding when body temperature decreases, which is dependent on ambient temperature. In contrast, cockatiel chicks are brooded continuously for 10 days after hatching, then inúermittently for 2-3 days, after which the chicks are no longer brooded during the day. Aims of this thesis Quail and cockatiel are non-passerines which hatch with a similar body mass (about 4 g). Little information exists for the patterns of growth and development in avian species with small hatchlings other than altricial passerines. The incubation time of all embryos is inversely related to fresh egg mass and the degree of precocity at hatching. -
Red List of Bangladesh 2015
Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary Chief National Technical Expert Mohammad Ali Reza Khan Technical Coordinator Mohammad Shahad Mahabub Chowdhury IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature Bangladesh Country Office 2015 i The designation of geographical entitles in this book and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature concerning the legal status of any country, territory, administration, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The biodiversity database and views expressed in this publication are not necessarily reflect those of IUCN, Bangladesh Forest Department and The World Bank. This publication has been made possible because of the funding received from The World Bank through Bangladesh Forest Department to implement the subproject entitled ‘Updating Species Red List of Bangladesh’ under the ‘Strengthening Regional Cooperation for Wildlife Protection (SRCWP)’ Project. Published by: IUCN Bangladesh Country Office Copyright: © 2015 Bangladesh Forest Department and IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holders, provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holders. Citation: Of this volume IUCN Bangladesh. 2015. Red List of Bangladesh Volume 1: Summary. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature, Bangladesh Country Office, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. xvi+122. ISBN: 978-984-34-0733-7 Publication Assistant: Sheikh Asaduzzaman Design and Printed by: Progressive Printers Pvt. -
Bio 209 Course Title: Chordates
BIO 209 CHORDATES NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COURSE CODE: BIO 209 COURSE TITLE: CHORDATES 136 BIO 209 MODULE 4 MAIN COURSE CONTENTS PAGE MODULE 1 INTRODUCTION TO CHORDATES…. 1 Unit 1 General Characteristics of Chordates………… 1 Unit 2 Classification of Chordates…………………... 6 Unit 3 Hemichordata………………………………… 12 Unit 4 Urochordata………………………………….. 18 Unit 5 Cephalochordata……………………………... 26 MODULE 2 VERTEBRATE CHORDATES (I)……... 31 Unit 1 Vertebrata…………………………………….. 31 Unit 2 Gnathostomata……………………………….. 39 Unit 3 Amphibia…………………………………….. 45 Unit 4 Reptilia……………………………………….. 53 Unit 5 Aves (I)………………………………………. 66 Unit 6 Aves (II)……………………………………… 76 MODULE 3 VERTEBRATE CHORDATES (II)……. 90 Unit 1 Mammalia……………………………………. 90 Unit 2 Eutherians: Proboscidea, Sirenia, Carnivora… 100 Unit 3 Eutherians: Edentata, Artiodactyla, Cetacea… 108 Unit 4 Eutherians: Perissodactyla, Chiroptera, Insectivora…………………………………… 116 Unit 5 Eutherians: Rodentia, Lagomorpha, Primata… 124 MODULE 4 EVOLUTION, ADAPTIVE RADIATION AND ZOOGEOGRAPHY………………. 136 Unit 1 Evolution of Chordates……………………… 136 Unit 2 Adaptive Radiation of Chordates……………. 144 Unit 3 Zoogeography of the Nearctic and Neotropical Regions………………………………………. 149 Unit 4 Zoogeography of the Palaearctic and Afrotropical Regions………………………………………. 155 Unit 5 Zoogeography of the Oriental and Australasian Regions………………………………………. 160 137 BIO 209 CHORDATES COURSE GUIDE BIO 209 CHORDATES Course Team Prof. Ishaya H. Nock (Course Developer/Writer) - ABU, Zaria Prof. T. O. L. Aken’Ova (Course -
Caged in the City: an Inventory of Birds for Sale in Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam 1 TRAFFIC REPORT
TRAFFIC CAGED IN THE CITY: REPORT An inventory of birds for sale in Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam SEPTEMBER 2017 James A. Eaton, Minh D. T. Nguyen, Madelon Willemsen, Jessica Lee and Serene C. L. Chng TRAFFIC Report: Caged in the city: An inventory of birds for sale in Ha Noi and Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam 1 TRAFFIC REPORT TRAFFIC, the wild life trade monitoring net work, is the leading non-governmental organization working globally on trade in wild animals and plants in the context of both biodiversity conservation and sustainable development. TRAFFIC is a strategic alliance of WWF and IUCN. Reprod uction of material appearing in this report requires written permission from the publisher. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations con cern ing the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The views of the authors expressed in this publication are those of the writers and do not necessarily reflect those of TRAFFIC, WWF or IUCN. Published by TRAFFIC. Southeast Asia Regional Office Suite 12A-01, Level 12A, Tower 1, Wisma AmFirst, Jalan Stadium SS 7/15, 47301 Kelana Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia Telephone : (603) 7880 3940 Fax : (603) 7882 0171 Copyright of material published in this report is vested in TRAFFIC. © TRAFFIC 2017. ISBN no: 928-983-3393-74-9 UK Registered Charity No. -
Conservation Status of New Zealand Birds, 2008
Notornis, 2008, Vol. 55: 117-135 117 0029-4470 © The Ornithological Society of New Zealand, Inc. Conservation status of New Zealand birds, 2008 Colin M. Miskelly* Wellington Conservancy, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 5086, Wellington 6145, New Zealand [email protected] JOHN E. DOWDING DM Consultants, P.O. Box 36274, Merivale, Christchurch 8146, New Zealand GRAEME P. ELLIOTT Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, Private Bag 5, Nelson 7042, New Zealand RODNEY A. HITCHMOUGH RALPH G. POWLESLAND HUGH A. ROBERTSON Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand PAUL M. SAGAR National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 8602, Christchurch 8440, New Zealand R. PAUL SCOFIELD Canterbury Museum, Rolleston Ave, Christchurch 8001, New Zealand GRAEME A. TAYLOR Research & Development Group, Department of Conservation, P.O. Box 10420, Wellington 6143, New Zealand Abstract An appraisal of the conservation status of the post-1800 New Zealand avifauna is presented. The list comprises 428 taxa in the following categories: ‘Extinct’ 20, ‘Threatened’ 77 (comprising 24 ‘Nationally Critical’, 15 ‘Nationally Endangered’, 38 ‘Nationally Vulnerable’), ‘At Risk’ 93 (comprising 18 ‘Declining’, 10 ‘Recovering’, 17 ‘Relict’, 48 ‘Naturally Uncommon’), ‘Not Threatened’ (native and resident) 36, ‘Coloniser’ 8, ‘Migrant’ 27, ‘Vagrant’ 130, and ‘Introduced and Naturalised’ 36. One species was assessed as ‘Data Deficient’. The list uses the New Zealand Threat Classification System, which provides greater resolution of naturally uncommon taxa typical of insular environments than the IUCN threat ranking system. New Zealand taxa are here ranked at subspecies level, and in some cases population level, when populations are judged to be potentially taxonomically distinct on the basis of genetic data or morphological observations.