<<

The stratigraphy of the Supai formation along the , central

Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps

Authors Jackson, Robert Louis

Publisher The University of Arizona.

Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author.

Download date 04/10/2021 11:56:03

Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551171 THE STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SVPAI FORMATION

ALONG THE MOGOLLON RIM

CENTRAL ARIZONA

Robert L. Jackson

IY %

submitted tothe'faculty of the

Department of Geology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

in the Graduate College, University of Arizona

1951

Approved: Director of Thesis KonvoiHO'i i/^ua s e t yo a e c i t a h t s ya'r

!.;IH .TOJJOCO:.; hht cjioja

AHOarviA JAHTMa'O

,'toa>!o6A •J J'lodcr.

ailJ- So y^R 2 badiliadsjz

lo co^"iO-b 3d;j •zcl e.dncr-ts'ilsipa i odd So d iio n X I.tllif'i Io .td fioq ai LCDiiHIDS %0 HATSA:i

onori'iA So x^lii'xovlnu tc^oIXoD ojDwba^O odd nJt

1691

& £?3v°,^ clA O J‘v'j alssrfT So •loioo'xlCI /9&'r ¥4 •’, : - CONTENTS

Page vr/ -.i:.;: , , «• * LIST OF I L L U S T R A T I O N S ; ^ .• . .* ...... i ; v

ABSTRACT . * . . ; . ■; ; vi

CHAPTER I ...... !.'r; .4 . . . . v . . .*

INTRODUCTION7 ^ ^ . .« v v / 1-

Purpose and me thdds of investigation . . . 1 Location and: accessibility . . . . 2 Acknowledg®nent‘s . . . . .* . . •* . .* . 2

CHAPTER II . . . 'i: 0‘ - • : rr GEOGRAPHY . . e" ‘ e *e * • ''a- .' .- .* .♦ 4 XV * on 4 # # ' ve" ' e V" # e # e r4i .•. • # -. • * * • e e e e 5 Climate. . ■v'V .xy.'-* -. e V -• e e e e ..j. i r.. ■ CHAPTER III 7 r; rur; yj.cu

GENERAL GEOLOGY V'. X.'.► • . -.’v’. - . v ......

Summary. * * e * * % SEDIMENTARY ROCKS ...... n. i Ivl C- J iXn CZZ ‘v i Z-Vi.. * « p * s < « » * * r- 7 P r e c ^ b r l a n ; ^^. .• v .= v .* / 7: ICo u.Hazatzal quartzite.’ . . .* .- . ; .»,«*»*- .* ,* .* .■ •' ~; Tapeeits sandstone .'.- .* . .* I ...... • 10 % 7" ar@rbme / formation...... 10 . . .* .= .< . .* . .* .• .* .« .- 12 Redwall limestone ...... • 12 . "iX . .T . •*.».' .• 15 Naco limestone; . vX* . . . . .' 15 ...... : Supal formation . . . . ■. .- . . ' % Coconino sandstone...... 16 ■ : y v v 1 kcnsnLyx: v ■: .... <- - - - t t ‘ •$ «- - r"> r " .. i . 4 . ■' .j. -V - < ‘ '*• v *■ ** f ■*'

219140 ill

Page

IGNEOUS R O C K S ...... r lT .

';granite...... 17 Tertiary basalt...... 17

STRUCTURE ...... 18

F a u l t i n g ...... 1 8

OIL AND GAS POSSIBILITIES...... 18

Reservoir rock ...... 18 , Source beds. . ,...... 19 Structural traps ...... 19 " ' ' ■' - • . .1 ‘ * ' ■ • : - • ' -■ ' : ». • - ■* - ♦ 4 % a i • V , CHAPTER 17 ...... 20

STRATIGRAPHY OF IHE SUPAI FORMATION ...... 20

Physical properties of the Supai formation . . . 20

LITHOLOGY OF THE SUPAI FORMATION AT MEASURED SECTIONS...... 21

Sycamore Canyon section...... 22 section ...... 23 Horse Mesa section ...... 24 Beaver Creek section ...... 25 West Clear Creek section ...... 25 section ...... 26 Spade Ranch section...... 29 Washington Park section...... 30 Kohl Ranch section ...... 31 Tontb Creek section...... 31 Babe Haught Ranch section...... 32

STATISTICAL STUDIES OF THE SUPAI F O R M A T I O N ...... 34

Cross-bedding study...... 35 Mechanical analysis study...... 37

Summary of physical properties...... 37

Stratigraphic relationships of the Supai formation of central A r i z o n a ...... 42 ir

;.;ov -r J--;-:v.'.t ? a.£.e

PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONS ...... 42:;

STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIPS ...... 44

PENNSYLVANIAN-PERMIAN RELATIONSHIPS . . . . 49

Summary and conclusions...... 52

FAUNAL LISTS FOR LOCALITIES...... 54

BIBLIOGRAPHY ...... 56 ■ ' . - f..:- : r."’; vV ' , - » .. DESCRIPTION OF MEASURED SECTIONS . . 59 v.'

; •: ■ i-

c T

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS m m

Plates IjO;’;'

I v. Geologiclmap Mogollon Rim, Pine quadrangle • : In pocket

Figures . <. v ;: . : n) .1' ,;ir.

1 ,. andex map ot. area studied.: . . • .t ...... • 3

2. Index map to locality of measured sections . . . . . 9

3.. - Circular^ graph showing^ number- of measurements within each ten degrees of arc.’ Horse Mesa. .... 38 :'V Y--:V:r I"’, bot'l:' " V ' J. Y Y1:-I' . ' • 4. Circular graph showing number of measurements within each ten degrees of arc. West Clear Creek. . 39

5. Circular graph showing number of measurements ? ; within each ten degrees of arc. Washington Park . . 40

6 . Histograms showing grain size distribution at specific localities...... 41

7. Correlation of columnar sections ...... 45

8 . Generalized Supai section, -Fort Apache, Arizona...... 48

•:* c o

YY Y-IY -IflY Y "i..'.I-^ v "'•Vi

V",;- =. ;:,:v

ABSTRACT i ; .V f J.";

r!.. r: Vl ' Ah i^Mti^ati^n of: tlie Str&tai' relationships of : the Supal formation was conducted in central Arizona in the summer of 1950. The area studied includes Sycamore

- . ^ " f . 5 - z*„ , r<» . * \ ‘ t .V '* - . •• , v - '"1 * ' ' •“ ‘ * ; ’ * Canyon on the northwest. Oak creek, Munds and Beaver

Creek Canyons to the southwest, and the Mogollon Rim ! from Pine eastward to Promontory B^itte. The Mogollon '

Rim and many colorful canyons of northern Arizona are carved into the Supal and overlying formations.

To understand better the stratigraphic relation­ ships of the Supal formation, a series of eight detailed sections was measured. Correlation and comparison of the writer’s Fossil Creek section with the Oak creek Canyon section of McKee to the west, and the composite section of

Winters at Fort Apache to the east is made through faunal and facies relationships.

The Supal formation in eastern and central Arizona is divisible into members through lithology and topographic expression. The lower units of the Supal formation intertongue with the Naco limestone of Pennsylvanian age to the east. The upper limestone facies of the Naco limestone crosses time planes, ascending in the geologic column eastward. The upper limestone facies of the Naco limestone at Fossil Creek con­ tains a fauna of Des Moines age. The upper limestone facies of the Naco formation at Fort Apache contains a fauna of vii

Missourian and Virgin an age. The Packard Ranch and

Oak creek members as defined in this report grade laterally into and intertongue with the Naco limestone to the east and are considered of a Pennsylvanian age.

The Supai formation of central Arizona is an advancing continental deltaic deposit of Penney!vanian-

Permian age which has caused regression of the Pennsylvanian sea due to sedimentation exceeding subsidence on a stable to mildly unstable deposltlonal shelf.

. ;v : - 'in ' ■ J, V'-:;

?■-

- ■ r.'t " ; 7 : ;r; nr \y

GHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

Purpose and methods of Investigation

This report represents a study of the lithology and facies relationships of the Supal formation along the

Mogollon Rim in central Arizona# n r .: - 7 r. .x'rr 7

The stratigraphic relationships of the Supal formation in central Arizona were; studied^ following a,program of field ai«i laboratory techniques. Attention was-given to the relations of rock units to faunal zOnes, of marine to non-marine facies, of cyclic sedimentation, and of sediment­ ation in relation to transgression and regression, consider­ ation was given to the geomorphology and structure of the area studied. I r % y;-7 y yrxvij.:';D-

Field methods included measurement of detailed ' stratigraphic sections, collection"of faunal- suites and representative rock.samples, and preparation of a geologic map ;ishowing:areal.distribution of the Supal formation within the Pine quadrangle map. of the U. S. Geological Survey

(Plate I). The faunal suites and representative rock sample collection are deposited at the Museum of Northern

Arizona, Flagstaff, Arizona. Laboratory methods include the mechanical analysis of detrital sediments and identification of the faunae collected.

Location and accessibility >

The area of the present study, which may be seen = on the index map (fig. 1), includes Oak creek, Munds and

Beaver Greek Canyons to the northwest and the Mogollon

Rim from Pine eastward toward promontory Butte. Improved roads traverse the area and numerous ranch roads lead to nearly any desired locality. The Camp Verde, Pine and

Promontory Butte quadrangles published by the U. S.

Geological Survey include the area studied.

Acknowledgement a

The writer wishes to thank the Museum of Northern

Arizona for laboratory and library privileges. E. D.

McKee, assistant director of the Museum of Northern Arizona

and Professor of Geology at the University of Arizona,

supervised the project, gave the writer assistance in the field, and reviewed the manuscript. Others deserving a note of gratitude are members of the geology Department

of the University of Arizona and the assistant research

associates of the Museum of Northern Arizona. 3

/ 14° //,2 ° // 0 °

1 1 Spring Mts. 1 0------______3 / c O - ~n i u \ ------j---- J 5 ° \ \ \ > i 1 \ o Flagstaff 1 < 1 1 1 j^ Q _____ / ' \ X, ------1— 3 4 ° \ sOFort I Apache j f •Phoenix 1 1 ^ Area of study: cr oss ruled Traverse of Fig. 2*broken line l1 { 1 oTucson *2° 1 j£ . ------j-J £ ° //< 1 25 ' 0 'c 1 SCALi ______1 - to 0 INDEX MAP Fig, / 4

CHAPTER II 0 - '

GEOGRAPHY

Riysiography

The area herein described lies along the border of the Basin-Range and Plateau physiographic 5 - provinces as described by Fenneman-^ The relief of the l- ■ ''V-, Fenneman, H. M., Hiyslographlc Provinces of Western United States, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1931.

area Is considerable; an elevation differential o f ,3,876 ; . feet exists between the level of Oak Creek at Sedona,

Arizona, in Sec. 8 , T. 19 N . , R. 6 E.,. and Baker Butte in Sec. 2, T. 12 N., R. 9 E. The most prominent physio­

graphic feature in the area is the Mogollon Rim along which the Paleozoic Supai and coconino formations, and

the Tertiary flows of basalt are exposed.

That portion of the area studied which lies along : .

the Mogollon Rim is heavily forested. The Mogollon Rim

is the dividing line for the Coconino and Sitgreaves

National Forests to the north arid the’ Tbntb National Forest’

to the south. Due to the heavily forested nature of the

rim area, only one complete section of the Supai formation

suitable for measurement and study is exposed. Six partial 5

sections of the Supai formation were measured at locations relatively free of vegetative cover. A description of the flora and fauna of the area studied is beyond the scope of this report* - - - : ■ v-v. rx.c:

• . Drainage

The drainage of the area comprises two series of dendritic streams, one of which is in the higher country above the Mogollori Rim and the other in the lower country below the generally east-west trending escarpment. The upper dendritic intermittent series drains to the north and north east to an eventual junction with the Colorado •

River. The lower dendritic intermittent series rises along the steep slopes of the Mogollon Rim. Southward, various branches join to form the East Verde river and Tonto Creek which are perennial streams that drain to the south and southwest.

Climate

The climate of Arizona, which is highly variable, is discussed by Smith-/ at length.

17------Smith, H. V* # The climate of Arizona, Univ. Ariz. Coll. Agr., Bull. 197, July, 1945.

Along the Mogollon Rim, the temperature and precipitation are functions of the elevation. The prevailing westerly and 6 southwesterly winds carry warm air masses from the desert regions to the west. These are lifted and cooled in their passage over the Rim. Precipitation results from this uplift if the moisture content and temperature change fall within critical limits. As a consequence, precipitation along the Mogollon Rim is relatively high for the sta te of Arizona.

In late July and early August, showers fall almost daily. The winter wet season occurs from December to

February, , :. ,,, ...

The summer climate of . the Mogollon Rim area is highly salubrious, w M c h is one of the factors making the region a desirable vacation site. . . . 7

rcr'.c b oib "biJ-. :

- ::x--v:or:--" -j";- - rcckr, Ho avi.-:f:z ;;/ CHAPTER III a vr:?^;-, Vi'l'-on^ oT'a iila:!::--' aHj.ch aaa'l vith tli a-a

...... - ' GENERAL' GEOLOGY H'. 1;, D<'? a -ai Ha a at aal .:-cyv' ai'-lci -.n ci-na " rr: . Oa :aL , o a , ,a . , Hull,. ••.•.:■* „ C'ia l'a.a . Summary

' a a r:. -ad ^a-rMa-aaidaua. Ina a; a.%1 c The aedlmeatary; roeka: :e3qp©aed within thej area- mostly. belong to the Paleozoic era. These strata are essentially flat lying, but .gentle northerly dips up to a maximum of five degrees; have been mapped. One high-tangle .fault of low displacement; was-mapped = near Pine, •Arizona- (Plate I ) •

: The exposed Igneous rooks in the area include , -a.

Precambrian .granite of limited outcrop and-Tertlary basalt j — ! / flows of considerable: areal;distribution (Plate: I).

SEDIMEHTAEY ROCKS $ A „ d'.z-dd , ?!> ld7C.

:d c Precambrian at dcn^o crovd 1 a ovcrlniu "a ft'd : a oar o': a a t V:>;. r;"f If.vont un ' ? cn .1 vlirt ■f;r'-ao Mazatzal quartzite: The Mazatzal quartzite, a formation f r a::".;, ay,/r;r.'r -a a : adr; hy tf; ; I' Or’ -Tall vardra:; introductd by Wilson^ in 1922, includes sandstone, shale, 17 Wilson, E. D., Proterozoic Mazatzal quartzite of central Arizona, Pan-Am. Geol., Vol. 38, no. 4, p. 229, 1922.

' 4/ and conglomerate.bedsaof-Precambrian age.: Stoyanow-t^lists *1

Stbyanow, A. A., Paleozoic paleogeography of Arizona, Bull*' Geol. Soc. Am., Vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1258-1261, .1942. 1 , J/.: - •: -cna - vc^nil O r ••• Kohl Ranch •’.'revi: O .-Jp^de r Ton to Orach Grech O ',Vaehi;;.-'toc- Ferl: Q Babe HnughtSRanoh

three posaible-inte^retationacregardlzigii)laceme;nt: ofo: ^

h ' : ’ R r hh-R; --j- sv'yc-;;,... VaR '•— v>. ^ | R \ s'-h j!' | :|

Mazatzal group ainoag "the Freeaabriah: rockse: He; summarizea : ;r ! ... . - - ; /. .• | >R •/ ■ii i 5/ . :vv-^.,.r papers by .Wileohy^iahd::M deal with these 'h ii ; : av t ! I. Wllaon, E. P# * pre^a^riaricMaz&fczal r'evolutilori in = : : h : /|i II ! : central Ari zona, * Geol. Soc. Am^ i Bull * ^ vole 50, 1939 . i .- ' i * J' • ! ; r.::wvvs v jn ^ V. ;s2"ir i U 7a / •' - , i Hinds, He E. A., Ep-ArcKean and ep-Algonklan intervals ' i v .; ! in western North America, Carnegie Inst. Washington,,, Publ M ! 463, 1935. !'j i i , . VA C ii ii; 1 ■V-::v:55 - f !i Precambrian rocks. 3

The Mazatzal group is 170 feet thick and comprises ;i : - i R ', / ■■ir conglomerate, sandstone, clayst one, and slit stone beds i i h.. which occupy the interval between a highly fractured and, i IM

in part, metamorphosed granite and the Jerome fonnation . i h ii . .! of Devonian age. at Tonto Creek (fig. 2). Stoyanow-';,2/ states

ZT Stoyanow, A. A., (1942) idem, p. 1270. i:Q .ivCihrih; ' . .h- '."-i7 'c-,-, , V vm, ; c n ; ; : that the Mazatzal quartzlte at Tonto Creek is overlain by ■V.'.

fish bearing elastics of Devonian age, arid that these j U ; i

fossillferous elastics are overlain b y the ■' *,! ; . .R : ;• i- ^ ^ __ - xh.. i. - hh. xx R. of Mississipplan age. i c : ' ’ hS: - . % h,'1--." i - iii;; Cambrian- : Ih:

Tapeats sandstone; Noble§Z divided the Cambrian: system iri m ] ; :.C-h. ■■ -.R.. ( . , ^ - R;.:' 17 Noble, L. ?!, The shinumo quadrangle, District, Arizona, U..5. Geol. Survey, Bull. 549, pp. ' : 4 61—65, 1914. '■■ ■■ — ------— - ..— ■i-- — v.... „ ...

I: - - ‘- ■-v ho .locality of ccc r'crvi coct Lcuic, 9 © Horse Mesa ® Fossil Creek • Kohl Ranch O Beaver Creek O Spade Ranch @ Tonto creek O West Water Creek ® Washington Park O Babe Haught Ranch

Fig. 2 Index Map to locality of measured sections the Grand Canyon region of Arizona into three formations,

the , the and the,Muay ; -'

limestone in ascending order. Of these, only the Tapeats

sandstone is present below the Mogdllon Rim. ~ 9/ As noted by Stoyanow-', at the East Verde crossing_

WjT~ “ “ — Stoyanow, A. A., Correlation of Arizona.Paleozoic . formations, Geol. Soc. A m . , Bull., ▼ol. 47, p. 498,.1936.,

the discrimination between the Tapeats sandstone and the

overlying Arthrodiran sandstone of Devonian age on the basis

of lithology is difficult.. The Tapeats sandstone at this ,

localityis a fine- to very coarse-grained cross-bedded .

sandstone having a light brown to reddish brown color. The

low-angle cross-bedding is of the type noted by McKee— / .in 10 / McKee, E. D., Cambrian history of the Grand Canyon~ region, Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 563, pp. ,.43'-49, 1945. - - " ' - - ' - * » . - r. . * .-"V - • , " V ^ t ^ , X. - - * - f -- r-

the Grand Canyon region and indicates an offshore environment,

No fossils were found In the Tapeats sandstone in the " locality montionod# * ■^-'* ^ -— * *’■* * ...... * l :: •; Devonian

Jerome formation: The Jerome formation of Upper Devonian age ’ • 1 1 y . ' ■; ; - : >- " \ ' > '• •• '• - was introduced by Stoyanow— 'in 1930. A very detailed

ll/ Stoyanow, A. A., Certain aspects of Devon!c in Arizona (abstract): Pan-Am. Geol., vol 53, no. 4, pp 316-317, 1930. 11 description of the Devonian strata which are exposed near

Jerome, Arizona, was given:toy him 'In a later publication^/ - J t I S / ' - ^ ..o:\ j.b ■ l.-iT v , ■ lr, - oc ..Stoyanow, A. A . , (1936) Idem, pp. 495-497.

; i

15/ /' -..v Btoddler . J. W . , .and Dotorovolny, E. , Late Paleozoic stratigraphy-and oil and gas possibilities of 1 central and hortliwestern"Arizona, D. S. Geol. Survey, Oil and Gas Invest. Prelim. Chart 10, 1945. ,u j.lr : : or. . Vi;, l- "hoolo

21-: ' exposed;south of the Mogolloh Rim to the Martin limestone.

They: traced the Martin limestone from Globe, Arizona north- i-V'-'V-: - Ino" Cv r. tol/ro-o,; o/ vh-. : iio o lro irr/ oo r o r'r. ward to the Mogollon Rim and suggest that it may be traced

Into theiTemple Butte limestone of the Grand Canyon region.

Stoyanowii/ states that as a part of Mazatzal land separated o- ' v,: \ :r , y,;:: o - o Vx n o ■. the Devonian seas on its two sides, the lithologic nature of ther Jeromenand Martin formations are altogether different. ' 01: no r { : /-O . tn , Ocooo 0':On:-o l o c n l ' n y At the Tonto Creek locality (fig. 2), the Jerome ; r ' i :-v: r ol 2 i-orv; r.f :nooooo. formation consists of a light gray to reddish brown sandstone - o OU: 2 - on h :0- 0 . ;r:.2 '■ " : ;n :: o rn-:: xo: o o y >.7 i. r rO which Is conglomeratic at the base, and a series of sandstones 0 ' r V ;. y :'nO n ?. 07,0 ; '. ..I ' :_o - .ol . and siltstones. The Redwall limestone of Mississippian age ; : n n-,n;o n: -7 . 7oooon:o.nn o • olo..- - , 7o7'.o ool' nynoo lies over the Jerome formation with the appearance of edn- oo-o 0 . - o.ny ooL 0 on;" no 1 ol 7 oooono . oOm-'O :nno iL 'rn ;- formity. The writer found no fossils in the Devonian rocks io'yo- -O: A ol.-' 0: noou:,; 0: r o :oo is/ - C:-" ’• Icc.ollo v > at Tonto Creek, although Stoyanow— ' reports fish bearing o\X'f '". l /OO : 0. O Croon:: 2 ?J on

no St oyanow', A. A . , (1942) idem, p. 1270.; 'l-n OtrvlX.lr!.:. oo . . ■ o-:n;. - n crro /no:; 11.on -,.:/o 1;: n nc e v l.m o i n..:-7 elastics of the Jerome formation at this locality. 12;

Mississippian CO.-Vv-X':'; / 1 .. Oi' ^ - : - .

Redwall limestone: The Redw&ll limestone of Mississippian - - •** ■- • •• .j V- 'v •*' * i - > t„ <- - -x«,- ■**••••... -»» 3 g * m•- / ' age was .first, mentioned ..by Gilbert— 7 in 1875. In a recent

* 1 I # % rn 5 . ... '•.* .i •> ? - . -- » «■ - .* ' ’ •« -T - -- - » • W -•* «• •• v . - 1 1. -• TmnllTr , .. - — *- ^ ' Gilbert, G. K., U. S. Geog. and Geol. Survey W 100th Meridian, wol. 3,' pp V 162, 177-186, 197, 1875. *

study..oi‘.' the. RedwaJLl,_limestone, Gutaohick— 7 recognizes

17/ ■ / ' ■. ” " ' • " ' v-: ..u.-— .-Gutschick, R. ^C. ,- The -Redwall limestone, Ph.D thesis (in publication), Unir. of 111., 1942.

;; 7 :/ ("L ' ; ; ' . -' - . Kinder hook and Osage groups at Sycamore Canyon/ Arizona.

His'studies1 indicate aLthinning of the Mississippian rocks

toward the east and southeast.

At the Fossil Creek locality (fig. 2), more than

80 feet:of Redwall limestone was measured. This did not'

include the entire Redwall section; as the base of the

formation was concealed. At the Tonto Creek locality • ■. . . I-,, '-G-V • a-:;;;1 " ; ;;; ■' (fig. 2), 48 feet-of Redwall limestone"was measured.

This unit of the Redwall-llmestone was overlain by 27 feet

of collapse breccia resulting from late Mis sissippian or e arly

Pennsylvanian karst topographic development. This collapse

breccia, comprising red siltstone/chert, jasper and limestone

fragments, was also noted at the Fossil Creek locality.

The Redwall limestone at the Fossil Creek locality

is composed of light gray aphanitic to coarsely crystalline

limestone. Some of the limestone units are crinoidal, others 13

/; " . V- ■' -- >. C-.1 _.V . "f -- - *! %. •>- 'r ; 1 - ' - " ' V : ' contain a fauna of extiremely poor preservation. Stoyanow,18/ O'-r.',,:: ,,.r_ .Stoy«lo.?!A. A., (1936) Idem, p. 512. :.. 0 V:. v reports crlhold he ads (Riysetocrlnus ) of good pre servation

■ ' I . ■i* ' _ ■' - •- * •• ' * .-Ws *> £ •'* ■ .’■r ■■■■*{ * *- •*, * . * t i t t »: - £ * . - , in the Redwall limestone between Pine and Payson, Arizona.

Huddle and Dobrovolny— ^ report' several specimens of '

Huddle, J..W., and Dobrovolny, E., idem. . .4.11::,LO'.;r„ l- i o a, i1 :-_C 1U. .i :

Id.thdstrotidhella in the' collapse hreccia at Salt River ------.!------... 6anybh—tarthe south, and suggest that sslssipplan' beds ' as young. as St. Louis, time, may, once have been present.

Pennsylvanian , lr= th.' c :

f ^ ff:-1 '1 f'1 « Waco limestone: The Waco lime st one as originally de scr ibed by Ran'sbme§^: in" 1904 contained both' Peimsylvaniah and :: ".j t o f b-'iiz 1 noiod Ransoms, P. L . G e o l o g y and ore, deposits of the Blsb.ee quadrangle^ Arizona, 8; Geoli. Survey Prof ; Paper 21; ^ pp. 33-42, 1904...... , u;:* n vcrvv c.r. i liirri-r-t'cne con•-• lo r:c r'.tc? c-c-

r'; ^ V ^ lh v a stwly of' the Su paiPermian rocks. Stephen Winters 21/ lhv a stwly of' the SupaiPermian 021/ Winters, S. S., Ph.D thesis (unpublished) Columbia University, and personal communication, 1950. ; / r —r J. c; n'yM-c oy .'.rv' r.:-- formation near Fort Apache reports foramlniferal limestone of Virgil age. Fossils of Des Moines agb occur atdthe"

Fossil Creek and Kohl Ranclrlocalities (fig. 2), and are also found near the base, of, the Waco limestone in,the Fort .’.V -.V w : i Apache area below the fossil zone reported by Winters.

The Naco limestone of east central and central Arizona intertongues with and grades laterally into the lower Supai units, so Pennsylvanian age is indicated for a considerable portion of the lower Supai formation in the area studied.

The FennsyIranian**Permian relationships are discussed at greater length in the section oh stratigraphy.

The Naco limestone at Fossil Oreek and Kohl Ranch

(fig. 2 ) comprises intercalated mudstone, siltstone, sand-

stone, and light gray limestone beds. Stoyanew 55/ reports

Stoyanow, A. A., (1942)'idem,,p. .1274, I;.i ‘.r. • a prepo^erahee of clastic rocks in the Naco limestone over the Fayson Headland, and at Tonto creek thin fdssillferous limestone beds are underlain and overlain by shale and

sandstone beds. A cyclical repetition of beds is noted

at the Fossil Creek locality (fig. 2). Three sequences of Vv r T. ij- ' : r ::.r alternating limestone and limestone conglomerate beds are

: • .V '• L - -'v: -:J "•:: : v". :: -■ v.V" : . : - : ' -i h , " i'i " reported-'in the measured section at Fossil Creek.

■ : ‘ ' :: •• kCi\

Permian * -1 »■’ • - . 1 1-W- -. ;io- i n

- -- v ''-.-, .'-.i.-v '' --. v- .... _ - . . „25., Supai formation: The Supai formation was named by Barton

Barton, N. H. , ,A reconnaissance of parts, of south­ western New Mexico and northern Arizona,' U. S. Gebl, Survey Bull. 435, p. 25, 1910

the type locality being; In Havasu Canypn in. the north 15

central Grand Canyon region. a;.',vr IA,, ^rrv; a.L T.he \ -• ,• Only one complete section of the Supal formation ; i. a L v a a aaA v rcn-'1 r c 1X - cl •• • v c- .i. o 3 ;• <.t Ck; 1 /: a v c io nt>» has been measured in the area of the present study (Fossil

Creek, fig. 2). The thickness at this locality is 1,675

feetlLASix partial sections of the gupai formation were --

measured in the area. 1 Alov; cv :rj northern ivlovair

The - Supal ^formation may be divided1 into unit sc6fn:

considerable areal extent. McKee— ' recognizes three distinct r ; r ; --V;; , , Al- , I'iov:po „ l: i- C V .

McKee, E. D., personal communication, 1950; : 1: " v v l ' ; ; ; . l y v y oco o- I v '

members of the Supal formation at Oak Creek Canyon, near v , 1. u-., v vvv- Coc oryno V f;v;0stov;:; vo"::c,^;o . Sedena^ Arizona; Winter#^/ recognizes four members in the

5S/- - ■ • ■ • Winters, 8 . S., idem.

Supal formation at Fort Apache, Arizona^ - The ^ three members 0lc;.l.'O ronllo-;.-, l- . Vol, ::u, 7, 11, 5. of McKee and the two uppermost members of Winters are

recognized by t W writerc at '-the Fossil creekflocality. ^ -

> >i;-; -TheiSupai formation5 in- the area ^'studied consists of

r an intercalated series of sandstone, isiltstone, - mudstone

and some limestone'beds. Supal strata along the Mogollon

'Rim ‘are;essentially flat-lyin^, the maximum dip noted in

the area mapped is five degrees I The ’-Nacd-Supai format! brial

[relationships are vdiscussed in-the;section on stratigraphy.

vy ir.y The boundary ^between the Permian 1 Supal and Co coni no

formations-is gradational. Huddle and Dobrovolny^/ '''-'"Ti fil".".V:1.'fill i.f/ • urlv; Huddle, J. W., and Dobrovolny, E., idem. arbitrarily draw the^boundary;at the base of the lowest massive sandstone with well-developed Coconino-type cross- bedding.

Coconino sandstone? The sandstone of the Coconino formation, which has extensive distribution over northern Arizona was 27/ named by Barton— . An e oil an environment for the Coconino

27/ : Z \': \ ;;;l- . .._i Z v Barton, N. H., idem, pp. 21-27.

:.o . z v z . v . : z". : 28/ sandstone is indicated by detailed work of McKee— ' and w . ; McKee, E. B . , The Coconino. saiMlstone, Carnegie Inst. ■ > of Wash., Publ. no 440, 1954. ' " ■ - ' - - ' - : -- ' ^ 'ibv .'•r./'r : V ; r-v.:;

Reiche— : ,V0 ••• z:;: /•.: . „v;;

H 9 /. OZ-. r-z , • OV - X ; : *: ;; : •,, • r. ■ - ;; h :.', Reiche, P., An analysis of cross-laminations The Coconino sandstone. Jour. Geol., Vol. 46, no. 7, 1938.

The individualtbeds of the Coconino sandstone consist

almost entirely of fine- to medium-grained sand. The XV-i--:, Z-::" v::v;: s V ' V z V .'.r7 , .. -.z v ii' ov;-;- . cross-lamination wedges of the formation dip in many ■X-’- . W ;• V r; ;V :,z,; . : loo.: V-‘ z l . . O': '.O'X' O li .' - . o r r directions, but mostly south. In the Mogollon Rim area, the o I/O.. o. . olo ; .. , . 0 o-oo/ :0r ; •, ' ' -ool Coconino sandstone is a persistent cliff-forming unit. ' • '• ' zo 0 0- 0\U :':"0 o ;-;.o ",v V;c _Lo ' o': - o% or:. V o The Coconino sandstone is 104 feet thick at the Fossil 11'. Oo-O o ;.0-‘o'.o. ’ : :V . O O V o Xto'i Oo-o.o\ Creek locality. In most parts of the area studied it is ooo o' ^ ' "-oo •■o.V'o o- overlain by Tertiary basalt. A complete thickness of the

Coconino sandstone could not be obtained for the upper

portion of the formation has been stripped away, prior to th®: laying down of the basalt.

IGNEOUS ROCKS:

; . . - . ... *■ - : . - v -i- 1-1 r'.-r ' '• - V-c * - ^ . ... .^1'- ‘ : ' ' ■ : I r ' '$-fc p No careful study of the Igneous rocks exposed In the area studied was made; however, general features .I'V- :;>cc n: were noted. ■• 1 :i o f tno .v :;r ^ . vr.o r- in vf d 1:: ocout-i: io Precambrian granite ■'•'v./ • fItv: n j, , rn

i - " . •-» * •'* . « .v ■ >i {■» ^ ' i " ?. * c T V *• '■ . „ i f*. V ) -w The Precambrian granite exposed at Tonto Creek

(fig; 2 ) is a greatly decbmpbs'eA', partially metamorphosed r v , •'V-f i - J v. granite which is*highly faulted'and fractured. Quartz Veins and velnlets hare been Intruded into the granite and range from one-quarter, inch up to four inches in thickness. At this locality, the granite is overlain noneonformably by

• cl :“i u'■ f o-- :.0 vU.v -’.'L 'lC i C. younger rocks.

' -:;‘U t,-/ • •' ' m.1 -r /a: for c :

T e r t l i r -y (2) sour-.-. -3 v. eno --v it hi Vi

!■ ; % y> *»' t*. 1 ^ ' V : . - Thick accumulations of Tertiary basalt * lie over the

. * . ' v - .1 .K r. ^ - •*' •-* * - »► -V i ^ *• 'i ' »• ' ’ •-* ' f' , -r* " • r Coconino sandstone at most localities. Feeder dikes were ob served near the We st CleaV creek *16c Alitp; (f ig^ 2 y‘ And the basalt is considered by the writer to be local in origin.

The basalts are aphanitic and dark gray with dense to scoriaceous textures. • v e v .rv-r :

r. : '...rtof .fv: ; , f .. ; v .ir 1‘ :: rh '-rorKir : ;Oi 18

STRUCTURE: r 1 v - i v.

: Pauitlng : : ' : " ; " , , - :X:-VC i;- :: ' ’■ 1 IZ f - ’C:- t; X:. On© northwest trending,high-angle fault occurs near ,

Pine, Arizona (Plate I). This fault is indicated by differences in elevation of the Fort Apache limestone of the Supai formation. The area in which it occurs is heavily forested and the f ault, line has not been precisely located. The northeastern side of the fault is the.down- thrown side with a throw o f , about, 70 .feet. flIt,. is highly probable that more faults are present in.the.area mapped; but the heavy vegetative cover conceals them.

OIL AND GAS POSSIBILITIES ■ i: : The three prime requisites for the accumulation of . .. oil and .gas ..in quantity are: (1 ) reservoir rock porous and permeable to contain the oil, (2 ) source beds within the migratory zone with respect to initial and regional dip, and.(3). presence of a.structural,trap. . consideration, was given,to these three requirements, during field work 4 \ • « ", » «.*. *•- ■ » ’ ' >. 4 i s -1. 5 a — v * ' - * - , ~ v,' v .: •- ■ JJ-. •••*•'■ v -'• ' - ■ - ' « t ' " ' in.the area of study and in reconnaissance of adjoining

areas. ; '•"" - .A ;;V '.i;. ( i" :

. - ' • . ♦ Reservoir rock

A suitable reservoir rock should be both porous and permeable to allow migration into a rock and to provide storage space for the petroleum.

In general, the sandstone and siltstone beds of the

Naco and Supai formations have,a high degree :of permeability and porosity. ■ ' rdf::., 01 t;:-- .Si:.';:.! loir-lljcn

Source beds • •" : . t; on oo orcpooccl .1 n foceo o£ i: •: or.;-

A difference of opinlohoexlsts with regard rto ^the origin of petroleum. Bothtthe proponents of the organic theory and the proponents of -the bacterial decbmposition j c % theory are in general agreement in that source beds are - A. - uiic.rio-.-o of ti;o :: “me in oat: ion rhe a requlr^ieht in the genesis of petroleum. A In .the .area • ' ■■ -L £ v - o :-Ay ; 1 y c ^ , studied, black humic or bituminous shales are absent in the outcrops. This, however, does not .' preclude the possibility of migration from source beds in some adjoining area into reservoir-rocks of'central'Arizona, .or ; 1 u:

Structural traps i--'oolyraphy -,r th.o Aup-:, : r

'■ ' Vrv/irovri v-oi'nl--, 1 1 rv*• < - * ^ * j -<' - ri j . ' - : " ' -A Ai. 0;.' QZ > ZlOirO. 1 V'A.' . Anticlines-and domes.are the most favorable structures for trapping and retentioh of rigrating petroleum;u over of most of the Mogollon Rim area the strata-are relatively flat lying. Ho anticlinal or doiaal structures were noted! In the area studied.

;■ v ■ ":.A t; 1. . v

A": 0.:;r -IT - 1 ' : 20

' CHAPTER IV :

, . STRATIGRAPHY OF THE SUPAI FORMATION ,

Physical properties of the Supai formation

. The Supai formation as exposed; in the area of study

comprises alternating red to brown sandstone, siltstone, mudstone and some limestone beds. The character of the

bedding is siriiHaf to" that described by Johnston^/ as typical

Johnston, W. A.., character of the; stratification of the sediments in the recent delta of the Fraser River, B. C., Jour. Geol., vql, )0, No. 2, pp. 115-129, 1922.

of deltaic foreset bedding: "fine sand, silt;and clay,

thinly laminated, . irregular bedded and cross-bedded". ; .....

Hughes^/ cites as evidence for a deltaic environment in the

Hughes, P. Wi ] - The stratigraphy of the*Supai f ormation in the Chino Valley area, Yavapai County, Arizona, MS thesis (unpublished) ^XJniversilty of Ar izona, i.1950* ;

Supai formation, the following criteria: (1) distribution of well sorted parf le x e s or red bed material over wide areas, > ! .* ' • (2 ) alternating layers of siltstone and Very.fine-grained

sandstone. ... , . ....

Barrell^S/ has observed that .red shading into brown

Barrell, Joseph,' Relations between 'dlimate and terrest­ rial depositsJour. Geol., Vol. 16, No. 3, p. 286, 1908. 21

Is one of the most common colors of ancient continental

deposits, and that many of the red beds were of’fluriatile

origin. The pigment of most typical red beds-is:generally

believed to be-hematite developed in the regolith of the

source area, then transported and deposited as clastic

sediments in an extremely fine state of subdivision*;

Tomlinson**/ and Krynin eii/ have revlev.'ed tho differing :< -• 337 - : - ; ■. - Tomlinson, C. W., A study of the conditions of origin of the Permo- and Trlassie red beds of the western United States, four. Geol., Vol. 24, pp. 153-179, 1916.

24/:.. , ; ;; Krynine, P. D . , The origin of. red beds, Trans. N. Y. Acad. Sol., Series II, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1949.

opinions as to the origin of red beds, and have concluded

that red soils formed under a warm, moist climate are the

source of the coloring matter and much of the clastic material

in red beds. Most red beds apparently were flood-plain deposits

that accumulated rapidly enough to preserve the color, or in

a climate less humid than that in the sourbe area. Persistence

of the red color after;deposition depends on the presence of

non-reducing conditions.' - : ^

LITHOLOGY OF THE SUPAI. FORMAT!ON AT MEASURED SECTIONS:

Nine stratigraphic sections were measured within the •

area studied (fig. 2)• These are tabulated with their

locations given in degrees of Latitude and Longitude. The 22

Sycamore Uanyo^gnd-Qak,creek Canyon sections.of McKee were reviewed.:and are included in the following list: • ::

Locality rvr ;: .. . Location

-.r 1. Sycamore Canyon ^ 112°e3»40M W — 34953 ICO". N 2. Oak creek Canyon lll°44»43l» W — 34°52»50» N 3. Horse Mesa : 111043»15? W — 34°43»40? N 4. Beaver Creek 111°41*20? W — 34°40t50? N 5. West Clear„creek lllo40»22? W — 34°32i20” N 6. Fossil Creek 111°34»14»» W — 34°23'149 N 7. Spade Ranch 111°23*04? W — 34°24t02« N 8. Washington Park Ill°l6fl0? W — 34°26*09« N 9. Kohl Ranch 111°05’28» W — 34°19132« N 10. Tonto creek lllo05t37M W — 34o20»23*’ N 11. Babe Haught Ranch - 111°06*32? W — 34°22!39? N

Sycamore Canyon Section

The Sycamore Canyon section was measured by E. 1). McKee.

This section and the Oak creek canyon section were reviewed

and walked over by’the -writer: to help familiarize him with

the Supai format!on. ' : ^' '- 'i:- ;

The divisions made in the Oak creek Canyon section (fig. 7)

are recognizable at Sycamore Canyon; 1

The uppermost or A. member is:compost of-massive and

cross-laminated reddish-brown" very fine-grainedsandstone

beds which are cliff-forming. This member is overlain by

the Coconino' sandstone of-Permian age. . ' ' ■ A-V ; The B.member, immediately below' the A member - consists- ~

of siItstone b^Ls and a few thin siltstone conglomerate beds. • ' r - •* ‘ . Two arenaceous limestone units are contained in this member,

the upper being reddish-brown and structureless, the lower 2 25

b eing reddlsti-gray atiav pr q s 1ii« i tly bro’as-lasliiati^ v ' c„ ec;

: i Me « W - rO.-ritoa,tiril'«B Member: B em^ ^bmpriaea units forming the mein cliffs of the Inner gorge# This member la composed

of very f i n e ^ a i n M r W ^

Some alltatone" la present in this interval; twd limestones’' 1 v- occur hear tiie base.— These limestone beds are silty, and

cross' laminated oh a large-scale.

: McKee places the Supai-Naoo format!onal boundary arbi- 3'::c;vunc>w , A.,, x ly; u} ;> t trarlly. at. the_base_.of.massive cliff-forming units, conforming 1 : mith the usag e of Huddle: and": Dobr dv o l n y ^ .

,.._U .. '.'X . .:,vv::v ^ :v • . i.r j . V r Huddle, 1. W., and Dobrovolny, E., idem. 'o n nr,;.: ycomers Ca: •cn,

; * The Naco limestone at: ttiis-Xocality w eathers to a ledge-slope

topographic meprassion. (Hie Naoo limestone is preponderantly

siltstohe. - Three limestone units occur at about equal inter­

vals through the formation. The limestone units are reddish

brown to pale gray, aptescitl c and non-fossiliferous. The basal

unit is a collapse breccia or conglomerate which lies on top of

the Redwall*limestone of Mississippian age. This breccia or

conglomerate is a reflection of late Mississippian or early

PenneyIvaniah karst topography. This unit also is present at

the Fossil Creek, Kohl Ranch and Tonto Creek localities (fig. 2).

The section begins with this unit.

■■ ^ - . «-> ' • ■ - • • t ■ ^ Oak Creek Canyon Section 24

The Oak Greek Canyon section was measured by E. l>. McKee and is the locality for his three fold division, of the Supai f Ormation. :• b ^

;Member A is composed predominantly of very fine-grained.

cliff-forming sandstone and siltstone beds. This member is V.... . — ■ • . overlain^by the Coconino sandstone of Permian age., The Fort

Apache limestone of Stoyanow^/is included in this member,

Stoyanow, A. A., (19)6) idem, p. 5)3.

and is an arenaceous limestone at this locality .- Depositional

pinch-opt of the Fort Apache limestone lies somewhere between

Oak Creek Canyon and Sycamore Canyon, 16 miles to the west.,

Member B consists of units forming shaly slopes and

thin ledges of the middle canyon, and is predominantly reddish ■ v,,: Cb'- '-v ■. ;. :.b f- brown siltstone. A limestone and siltstone conglomerate is

present near the base of this member. . ;

- Member- C comprises units forming the massive cliff of

the inner gorge. isrosion has not yet cut deeply enough to

expose the base of this member. Member G consists of weak

orange and red sandstone and siltstone and some arenaceous

limestone beds. v: bi_ - v r■; . b l - .

Horse Mesa Section

The Horse Mesa section is a partial section of the Supai

formation consisting of incomplete exposures of members

A and B . • • • . y . ; ■■ , ■ -y. • - y ^, z y

. , The uppermost" or A member;ia overlain by Tertiary tbasalt

and an unknown thibkhess has been removed by erosion prior to

the incursion of basaltic Tertiary lava. Member A comprises

•reddish;,brown very fine-grained sandstone and siltstone units

which weather into cliffs. : . i.;; . - y; . r Erosion has\not yet exposed the base., of the underlying

B member at, this locality. Member B consists of ledge-slope

forming units of sandstone and siltstone..Four siltstone

conglomerate beds occur at intervals through this- member.-;

•An unsuccessful attempt was made to correlate conglomeratic

zones as they appear in the.measured section. The writer .

believes these conglomerates to be lenses which do not have

-great lateral extension. ; a r - - . . , ; ;

; • Beaver Creek section

The Beaver Creek section, like the Horse Mesa section

contains incomplete- A and B; members. - i ;; ; - ; : i , ;

Tertiary basalt over11es the cliff and;ledge-forming,

reddish brown, very fine-grained sandstone beds of A member,

_ vB.member comprises ledge-slope forming beds of orange

-and reddish brown, very fine-grained-sandstone-and-siltstone.

Measurement of the section was begun at Beaver Creek and;con­

tinued upward;without offset. •. - ,; : r

West Clear Creek section

At V/est Clear Creek, is a partial section of member A 26

37/ which includes the Fort Apache limestone of Stoyanow~' .

Stoyanow, A. A.* (1936) idem, p. 333.

■ ■ • • - : " : ; ' ‘ . " : • ^ • Erosion has not yet exposed the base of member A at this locality and an unknown thickness was eroded from the top prior to the basaltic lava flows of Tertiary age.

The sandstone beds which comprise this member are reddish brown, very fine-grained and weathered to vertical cliffs in the main canyon. The Fort Apache limestone, a dolo- mitic limestone, is less arenaceous at this locality than a t '

Oak Creek Canyon. The progressively greater arenaceous content of this limestone from Fort Apache westward and northwestward is illustrated by the line of sections measured for this study,

(fig. 2). ' " ' '' * '' " :

Fossil Creek section

The Fossil Creek section is the only complete section of

the Supai formation measured by the writer in the area studied.

The section includes a portion of the Coconino sandstone at the top, underlain by the Supai arid Naco formations in descending

order, and, at the base, an incomplete section of the Redwall

limestone of Mississippian age. ThePennsylvanian-Permian relations of the Naco and Supai formations are discussed later

in this report: ' v v : : ; -

The writer correlates the Fossil Creek section with the

Oak Creek Canyon section"of McKee2£/ to the west and the Fort McKee, E. D., personal communication, 1950.

Apache section of Winters&S/ to the east (fig. 7)• H7 Winters, S. S., idem.

The application of formal names to the members represented at Fossil Creek is an attempt by the writer to clarify correla­ tion of the divisions of the Supai formation from western to central Arizona, and is discussed at length in the section on stratigraphic relationships.^

The Corduroy “sand facies* member of the Supai formation • •: . . z ; • , - • " ' • *• • - : •• *-" : • • • • . . *s < , * . . : lies under the Coconino sandstone in the Fossil Creek area and is composed of cliff-forming, reddish brown, very fine-grained sandstone beds.

_ The Fort Apache limestone thickens westward from the Oak

Creek area and at Fossil Creek comprises ledge-forming beds of

gray, aphanitic limestone separated by thin mudstone partings. ,. _ If . _ The westernmost evidence of fossils in this member was found here. Preservation of the fossils was very poor, however, and

no diagnostic forms were found. ' r: ‘ !

The Big “A* “sand facies* member underlies the Fort Apache

.. . ::" ■ . . . • • . ... ' .■ limestone, it is composed of alternating beds of cliff— and

ledge-forming reddish brown very fine-grained sandstone and

siltstdne. - :: ' '' ::

The Oak Creek member is composed in this locality predom­ 28

inantly of orange and reddish brown siltstone intercalated

with minor beds of very fine-grained sandstone and siltstone

conglomerate. This member (B member of McKee) appears to I v :.:- - :■ :.v.v,' -; ...... •- contain these siltstone conglomerates throughout the area of

StUd3:‘ ::v /. : V :: v v;- • i - % ':::' : The Packard ranch member, next in descending order, is

composed predominantly o f .cliff-forming units of reddish

brown, very fine-grained sandstone and some siltstone beds.

Five units of light gray aphanitic limestone are present in it

at Fossil creek, whereas only three are.present at Sycamore

Canyon. This indicates an increase of the limestone facies

-at the expense of the arenaceous facies eastward.

The boundary between the Packard ranch member of the

Supai formation and the underlying Naco limestone was

arbitrarily placed at the base of the massive cliff-forming 40/ units conforming with usage of Huddle and Dobrovolny— '•

42/ , • . : '• •: Huddle, J. w ., and Dobrovolny, E., idem.

The Naco limestone of Pennsylvanian age comprises an

assemblage of reddish brown.very fine-grained sandstone j

beds, reddish brown siltstone beds, and highly fossiliferous,

gray, nodular limestone beds in.the area studied.‘ A Des >

Moines (early Pennsylvanian) fauna of good preservation was

collected at this locality. The basal unit of the Naco -

limestone is a collapse breccia or conglomerate similar to

that noted at this horizon in the Sycamore Canyon, Kohl 19

Ranch and Tonto Creek sections.

The Redwall limestone of Mississippian age is separated from the overlying Naco limestone by an erosional unconformity with a relief of fifteen to twenty feet.

Erosion has not yet exposed the base of the Redwall limestone. The Redwall limestone at this locality is a massive, coarsely crystalline limestone containing a fauna that is very poorly preserved. No diagnostic forms were found.

The writer followed a traverse in measuring the Fossil

Creek section different from that used by Huddle and Dobro- volny^k^ The new section is believed to be more complete.

3T7 ' ™ " Huddle, J. W., and Dobrovolny, E . , idem.

Spade Ranch section

i At Spade Ranch (fig. 2) is a partial section composed of the Corduroy "sand facies'* 1 member, the Fort Apache limestone, the Big "A" 'band facies" member, and a part of the Uak Creek member of the Supai formation, following the nomenclature established at Fossil Greek. A considerable portion of this section is concealed by vegetation.

The uppermost member, the corduroy "sand facies" member, is about ninety percent concealed under a timber studded, steep slope. Limited outcrops of reddish brown, very fine­ grained sandstone and siltstone beds were found in some of the steeper gullies. This member is overlain by Tertiary basalt, an unknown thickness having been removed prior to volcanism. The For;fc Apa<^e limestone: underlies tke Ctorduroy ••sand v r;V; facies”.,member a n d ; is a cliff-forming series, of limestone : : , and calcareous siltstone beds. The limestone beds are dark gray, medium* crystalline, and they weather to a pitted surface.

JNo fauna was^ found in the fort Apache limestone at this locality.

The siltstone beds are light brown and highly calcareous.

. - ; The;underlying Big ”A ” "sand facies“ member is predominantly composed of reddish brown very fine-grained sandstone.beds with some,siltstone units., ; , :

The base of the underlying Oak Creek member has not yet exposed by erosion at this locality. The member comprises alternating beds of light brown, very fine-grained sandstone and siltstone beds. :-- :

Washington Park section

At Washington Park, partial sections of the Corduroy

"sand facies" and Big "A" "sand facies” members of the Supai formation occur. The only member completely represented is the Fort Apache limestone which lies between the other two.

Erosion has removed some of the upper portion of the

Corduroy "sand facies" member. The part exposed consists of

reddish brown and light brown very fine-grained sandstone

and siltstone beds which are cross-bedded,in part.

The Fort Apache limestone comprises cliff-forming units

of medium crystalline limestone and gray calcareous siltstones.

No fossils were found in the Fort Apache limestone at this

locality. n

2 ^’I'Th'e Big - "A11 ^sand fablesM - member below the fort Apache limeatbhe is largely -ooBeealed"bn a steep, tree-studdedZslope.

■ ■ ■■ : .'-:vav r ; -h Kohl Bench section : — "i": r. :■ b -’r?: /^ti c c;;ior or • n .1.1 c r

Hirr'',A t'-^ h lr^ c h ?'ie^a''‘-partiar>seetibhbbfvthev-Rabo,''-lliiieitone of Pennsylvanian age. Measurement of the section was begun at a...zone. of., collapse breccia. and conglomerate which is the basal-unit 'of-the Naco limestone- and it was ^ continued - upward without' offset:to the top of the hill.

The Kaeb'limestone consists of- medium-crystallinei gray limestone beds^ alternatingi with gray-1- silty: limestone: beds .

A'few:light'brown siltstone units were/found through'the- section.' Limestones in the-lower poirtion* of the section contain a fauna of poor preservation. * - rcrr.av.cn f.ccvv

. .. m- ;• •'.'■» •* -•->-vi. -r~ . /•J -T-w, ci <- -■ »s. - '■ *V * Tonto Creek section /hr, .. . .."j: . It - ;r L 2 .itv 1 - 1 -~:l .t . l y .

. The Tonto”Gf eek section^was begun' at -the' Precambrian granite and continued-upward through the Precambrlan Mazatzal

"group ^ - the' Jereae formation, the Redwall limestone and ended with the basal conglomerate which is considered the basal 2i.bo .Urr*r r-v ,; cr. unit of the Naco limestone.

The Redwall-limestone lies under:the'collapse breccia ' or conglomerate- of- the Naco formation; It- consists of g r a y ' aphanitic limestone beds which weather to pitted surfaces and are noh-fossilif erous. " - "hbr 2cr,i.i il~a-;r: v 1 ....-'.rx /■.: : vr;:.!;

- " 5 Be tween the Redwall lime atonal above j and the Mazatzal ' -3 :• a 32

group of PreCambrian age.below, lies the Jerome formation — ^ L -.> _»■ % > % -*. " - •• «... - < ' of..Devonian..age.. The Jerome formation is represented by a 1_..- *1,/ \ -X ' - ^ , V M - » / . / . t ^ i.* L ... X+S ~~ .* (! ; v .* ■« -r # light gray t o reddish .brown ..sandstone which is. conglomeratic # V.v », * * - ■*. . •* - - V *, •• i -*•. # V- a f -V ‘v-' ? ‘ ^ ' . k t’>~ x * — ■ ■ * T * , --X- — —* V - near the base, and. a series ,of sandstone and siltstone .beds.

Stoyanow~/ reports .fish .remains of Upper -Devonian age at .L /; 1'

; r ™. h.!.: Stoyanow, A. , (1942) Idem.npV 1270.

: .:• n .'j v V, v;:e this locality, h^ex^r ,the,writM . c ^ i .fin^.no/Mails in. ,.

the Devonian rocks.

The Mazatzal group lies between the Jerome formation

above and the Precambrian granite below. It consists of a

series of conglomerate, sandstone, claystone and siltstone

beds listed in ascending order. A discussion of the relations

of the Mazatzal group and the J erome formation which lies above

was made earlier in this report.

The Precambrian granite is a greatly decomposed,

partially metamorphosed granite which is highly faulted and

fractured. The granite is overlain with nonconformity by

the rocks of the Mazatzal group.

Babe Haught Ranch section

The Babe Haught Ranch section (fig. 2) consists of the

Corduroy "sand facies" member, the JJ'ort Apache limestone, and a part of the Big "A* "sand facies" member of the tiupai

formation. Here, as at other localities along the Mogollon

Rim, the section is largely concealed beneath timber-studded

slopes. 33

The Corduroy "sand facies* member lies under the

Coconino, sandstone of Permian age. . ^ ; -i v,

•: The Jort Apache limestone crops put in a vertlpalg cliff ' ■ _ i below the Corduroy "sand- facies'? member. It consists of ■■ beds of gray aphanitic limestone and highly calcareous silt- stone. No fossils were found in this member at.this locality

Vjhe Big "A" "sand facies?’ member which lies below the

Fort Apache limestone;is largely concealed, under a steep tree cov@r@cl ^ - — — - ---

h-";:

. /-err: - '- l , 11.. T'/Jr

3:1 < o: 7: -

:7'7,'7 - A 77/ , % 3 37371':"-: r ::'3/n : " 3.,: -7 ' ' 3C cr'-:

3X3 V X: '"3‘. M

STATISTICAL STUDIES OF THE SUPAI FORMATION -.:ru '-;Vf -■ v v X C Cv u O ,

Laboratory work was begun at the Museum of Northern C:5-:; uv;.,'.:': ‘ v: vVvX;, Arizona, Flagstaff, Arizona, during the summer of 1950 between trips into the field, and completed in the fall of-1950 and^ the spring of 1951*- -1 -u : v:’ . ^

The:color of rook specimens collected during the ~ measurement of detailed sections was determined by the standard color chart— /. Textural descriptions follow

"Rock-color chart". Prepared by the Rock-color chart committee. Distributed by the National Research council, Washington, D. C., 1948. the standards established by Wentworth— The classification

44/ ” ’ " ' ~ Wentworth, C. K., Methods of mechanical analysis of sediments, Univ. of Iowa Studies, Vole 11, n o . •11, p. 24* 1926. of sorting evolved by Payne— ' has been followed in the

H 7 ' ,, ; ; 1 • Paynev- T* lG. * Stratigraphicsi ahalysls and environment reconstruction. Bull. Am.. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 1697-1770/ 1942. ... --TX ..T'.:' : .. . - .'I1 : '.L iVY .7' ^ v c 1 ' V* ■' description of measured sections. . . . , .

.....A field scale for the classification of cement was .. ' / adopted by the writer and used in writing descriptions of measured sections..It Involves the relative effervescence

In response to dilute hydrochloric acid. The cement was

classified as highly calcareousV calcareous, weakly calcareous, and non™calcareous. . • f Gross-bedding study . 2;

Statistical emalyses of cross-bedding were made at three localities. Horse Mesa,West Clear creek and Washington

Park (fig. 2). A statistical study of the cross-bedded units in any stratum yields two types of evidences (1 ) the direction of movement bf depositing medium, (2) the agent v*.. and environment of deposition.

Most' of the cross-bedding bhserved in the field may- ■ be placed into three types, *asymmetrical festoon", "low- angle compound", and "torrential"— / Thirty random readings

McKee, E. D., Classification and interpretation of cross-lamlnatloh, (abstract)s Bull.Geol. Soc. Am., Vol. 59, p. 1378, 1948. were taken in each locality in order to determine the average direction of dip for the cross-bedded unit.

For each area examined, the thirty readings were plotted on polar coordinate paper following the technique of Weir— The number of readings that falls within even

Weir, Gordon W., Geologist, Minerals Branch, U.S. Gobi. Survey, personal cowsmanicatibn, 1951. ~ ; 1 ten degrees of azimuth are graphically shown on the polar coordinate paper. The summation is made of the positive (») and negative (-) sine functions around the polar coordinate 36

paper, weighting the 'reiptfctiv4' function of the median’

between each of the tern degree intervals by the number of

measurements included in the interval. This same process

is used for the positive (♦) and negative (*) cosine

functions. The azimuth of the average direction of dip

( °^.) is that angle whose tangent is equal to the sum of the

sines divided hy the sum of the cosines, as follows:

■ . V f. j "■ J - . U . ‘ • Tan o < a ^ s i n - c :■ £L-cos

The quadrant in which the'resultaht falls is thsn determined

by Inspection of the signs (positive or negative) of the

respective resultant sines and cosines. From simple 1

trigonometry, the sine is positive (♦) in quadrants I and IV;

the cosine is positive (♦) ih quadrants I and II, i.e.j

''• . ' T i • * sin ♦ .008 * v. o-ihi . ::, : 003 ^ - r : - aln - sin > --cos -

; a r- The average degree of dip is ,simply the arithmetic .-Li. mean of the sum of the dips. '

The consistency factorZ(FQ) is aJiimasure of the

reliability with which any one measurement approximates the

azimuth. It is obtained mathematically through the following v ~r v L ■ : Vr-r n C ' . ; : : -l \ ,' ::: :,L.' .. ' - formulas - V / r ( g aln)2 f ( £ oo»)2 io • of measurements 37

The consistency factor was high, 1. e., greater than .50 at all of the locations studied.

Results obtained by means of the above technique are shown in figures 3, 4 , and 5.

Mechanical analysis study

Mechanical analyses based on percentage weight of the various grain sizes were made on representative samples

' ^ ■ .. . taken from members immediately above and below the Fort

Apache limestone. A comparison of results from analyses made of specimens of the lower members is not effective because only one measured section Included these lower members. ;: These analyses were detersdLned by means of the

"Tyler Standard Screen Scale" sieve series— ^ and the data

W " Twenhofel, W. H., and Tyler, S. A., Methods of study of sediments, McGraw-Hill Book Go., pp. 47-48, 1941. obtained from mechanical analyses are represented in the form, of simple histograms (fig. 6).

Summary of Physical properties

Studies of cross-bedding (figs. 3, 4, and 5) indicate

deposition toward the south and southeast. The mechanical

analysis study (fig. 6) indicates relative uniformity of

grain size and good sorting of the clastic„materlals. 5 DIP A^B'UTHS OF CROSS -LAI.' IK AT IOKS REGIONAL DIP LESS THAN NO CORRECTION

UNIT 13 HORSE VESA SECTION (BELOV.1 APACHE) 30 READINGS

EACH DIVISION EQUALS ONE V SA 3VR 5'BNT

RESULTANT DIF DIRECTION: 3 43° 3

CONSISTENCY FACTOR: .59 AVERAGE DEGREE OF SIP: 13°

Figure 3 Circular graph showing number of reasureirents within each ten degrees of arc: Horse Vesa• N

b

DIP AZITOTHS OF CROSS-LAMINATIONS

REGIONAL DIP LESS THAN 5°, NO CORRECTION UNIT 22 WEST CLEAR CREEK SECTION (ABOVE APACHE)

20 READINGS EACH DIVISION EQUALS ONE MEASUREMENT

RESULTANT DIP DIRECTION: 5 65° K

CONSISTENCY FACTOR: .6) AVERAGE DEGREE OF DIP: 17°

Figure 4- Circular graph showing number of measurements within each ten degrees of arc: West Clear Creek. N

ti DIP AZB.'UTHS OF CROSS-LAMINATIONS REGIONAL DIP LESS THAN 3°, NO CORRECTION

UNIT 14 WASHINGTON PARK SECTION (ABOVE APACHE)

)0 READINGS

EACH DIVISION EQUALS ONE KEASURSTENT RESULTANT DIP DIRECTION: 3 58° E

CONSISTENCY FACTOR: .65 AVERAGE DEGREE OF DIP: 16°

Figure 5. Circular graph showing number of measurements within each ten degrees of arc I Washington Park. F?. O o O O o O L\C H O CXJ Lf\O O A JD vO H CU O O

1.000 • e • e •♦ c - 15 - wcc O UNLf\ O C M v O x O O O O O . • • • • 1 o 1 1 1 p 1 il CM r-< O O 1 ea lA CVJ OJ 6 un , cxj cu 1 h abc ‘e scin T'" ‘ section ed abbrc* Th^ s > “ * / »Apaohe r ^ r r . b ^ r1 , cwA rf I

O ACMCU A O O O lA (\JO r-4 O O Oir\O O O UN CM H O O O UN H CM O O UN CU CM O O O - I r-4 O N CU UN O O • • • . • • • • P 17 - SP ■ 281 cxj

4% ; 1 xO xO xO ud I - •£'

| ■S o

50 90 70 60 60 10 20 8 50 50 40 40 ’ 50 80 on .L U z ^ 20 70 1 n > o 0 0 «—4 o O O If\ CUU\ O CM CUO O <£> O xO O O O O UN CM O O O t—i O UN CU ^4 0 0 UN CU ^40 O UN CU O O __ • I ir\ OJ FC 08 • • • • • out c 1 u fc11 r-« - bp low M

o I 1 1 cm O I

A dpc O O u\ JDCU O x0 O O UN O — I »—< 4 I r4 UN O O O UNCM xO CM H O O O O O O O U N C M C M • • • •• •

£ 2 OJ . l Z H i O i O

42

- ■ ":.... Stratlgraphlo relatlonahlpa :, .;., ■;' ofi the Supal formation of central Arizona 7.: ' . r 7\ , ;• Ci t;r.- : W v... : , 7;vv^.7..„ ,

• 7V. C:.% j v - j. :.1 Yi-7l. 7"' - 7- PREVIOUS INVESTIGATIONSl

The atratal relationships of the Supal formation have 7*'i^ : = ' 7 ' ; - 7 . c.-:, r i A_ , - : "been under discussion for many years. Barton**' introduced .'■'V. : -'.v'-:.- v:.:.. f ;;7 : : ■ d ^ ..r:;: c7 ^ 7.“ 7'.ir: : 7 - o-". H7 Barton, N. H., A reconnaissance of parts of south- : western New Mexico and northern Arizona, U. S. Geol. Survey Bill. 455, p r 257 1910. -.. “ . " V ; ':: -• . 7-1-?-: c7 7--n.l.-.: :7.-. 7-v ? (7:-. ■ C j :: . ' V';. J. , 7 0 7 , i O', '•-"C ■ the term Supal formation for a series of sandstones and

shales, ;the type locality being in. Havasu Canyon* The for- ; :

mation was redefined by Noble— ^ in 1922,. the. top 300; feet ; W Noble, ' L. F. ,. A section “of the Paleozoic formations of the Grand Canyon at the Bass Trail, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 131-B,pp. 59-62, 1922. " - - ■' '-^ ^ ■ • " ' ■ ■ • "O.l - 7i ", -.7 .i:: -v.; A /

of red beds being removed from the Supal and made a separate

formation,: the Hermit shale. Noble was inclined to regard

the entire Supal (redefined) as probably of Pennsylvania# age.

About 250 feet of Pennsylvanian strata which had formerly been

included with the Redwall- limestone of. Mississippian age were

added to the base- of the Supal. In a later publication.

Barton*®' states that asthe limestones exposed near Fort

51/ ' .. .. In 7^".vh^ ' ’ :• f Barton, N. H.,. A. resume* of Arizona geology, Univ. Ariz. Col. Mines, Bull. 119, p. 84, 1925* : 7

Apache contain Manzano fossils, most, if not all, of the red beds of the Supai formation are Permian in age. ; LongwellS^/ feS/-:-’ xv- /; vm../, l i e Longwell, 0. R., Geology of the Muddy Mountains, Nevada, U. Si Geol. Survey, lull. 798, p. " ST, 19^. 1' : :, through paleontological sidles In western Arizona indicates

Supai formation. The upper and middle parts of this formation are considered to be terrestrial deposits by White*'e In a -.'v-'h-vicr :-u- - '.:r. vo rx- 53/ " White/ David, Flora of the Hermit shale. Grand Canyon, Arizona, Carnegie Inst. Wash., Publ. 405, p. 10, 1929. ' T : 1 : Vf- , v i*. - r x ^ : X. • . -x.:, , .x •- l , recent paper devoted to the oil and gas possibilities of central and northwestern Arizona, Huddle and DobrovolnyS&/ Indicate

54/ ' ' Biddle, J. W., and Dobrovolny, E., idem. that the Supai formation transgresses time planes and probably ranges in age from Des Moines (Pennsylvanian). through

Leonard (Permlsh). : Cx-.--'- v x -

The Supai formation has been used in recent years as a thesis problem for student a of geology working toward advanced i;' l-~ px-p-x x. :pp; PL _.P, degrees, Winters*jkS/of Columbia University, made a study of w :• p v Winters, 8. S.,. idem. the Supai formation in the Port Apache area in the summers of

1947-1948i - Hughes— /, of the University of Arizona, studied

56/ px- ; X x..:; r.'x... Pvii :.P " .V V ' - \ ; . ■ - x .p ; f - Hughes, P. W . , idem. the Supai formation; In the Chino Valley area during the c summers of 1948-1949. The area of this present study, lies 11*■ - as a connecting link between these two localities. V ■ , ; : "-i ; : : : . :i k •> ■ * It u i - ! <-r STRATIGRAPHIC RELATIONSHIPS: ff *■ < C M A . ' A series of nine measured stratigraphic sections was made in the area studied (fig. 2). Attention was given

to the relations of rock units to faunal zones, of marine : '2 • to non-marine facies, of cyclic sedimentation, and of : ! I ■ ; : sedimentation in relation to transgression and regression. : I : . : A section at Fossil creek was measured along a traverse : : ' M • : • • c7/ different from that followed by Huddle and Dobrovolny*^'

Huddle, J. W., and Dobrovolny, E., idem.

as the new location appeared to contain a more completely

exposed sequence of Pennsylvanian and Permian rocks.

Correlation and comparison of the Fossil Creek section with ssy the Oak Creek Canyon section of McKee--' to the west, and the

McKee, E. D., personal communication, 1950.

composite section of Winters— / at port Apache to the east

H 7 “ : “ : Winters, S. S., idea.

is shown in figure 7. , ; vV' :• Supai strata in the area studied are essentially flat-

lying. Gentle northerly dips up to a maximum of five degrees Fig. 7

S u p ai

feet reflects its topographic expression. Naco formation shown completely limestone for contrast. FOSSIL CR E E K 46

have been aeas^edV^ • The formation eon's!ate of alternating

beds of very fine-grained’ sandstone, siltstone, mudstone,

limestone, and' cl ay at one; i The llthologi c; unite of the

Supai reflect the envlromwnt: of a stable to mildly, unstable

depositibnai shelf§2^ and the supai formation is considered

66/ - nv-'< r: t-r.~ i c..- . Dapples, D. C., Krumbein, W. C», and Sloss, L. L., -Tectonic control of lithologic assoclatIona, Am. Assoc. :- , Petroleum Geologists Bull., Vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 1924- 1947, 1 9 4 8 W-.: ;-'.v "h 1 r: ! ■.. . . / to be deltaic— ' in origin. As a result of the study of "v-C :-r 'I llr r i. yr.-.ov?.

LhlHughes,' P.1 W. , idem, p. 34.' r- t-'v vil b; cross-lamination surfaces in the Supai formation of northern

Arizona, McKee— indicates that the probable direction . 2'.--;r::'esvnc,-v:; .,y ^ ”or- V': - :: n ;:.- • W" McKee; ;1. D., Three typas of cross-lamination in Paleozoic, rocks of northern Arizona, Am. Jour. Sci., Lv- Vol. 238/ p. 822/ 1940. rr.-'; cl Vl:- ;c

v>,. OcC in which the sediment was transported was toward the south -■•'"-■r Cyny.ry y. .v.‘c , / ly-r.-cccC-■ c::cr,'-: :: ccc'i.l i .:c->h;:cc to and southeast. Hughes— ' reports an average direction of ■ v - ; -w Uly... i: ; , -i.r "It td t c t t l;u':h

'Hughe s; • P. Mil > idem: "p. ” 36; ' \ •: n tan: ft* the rt.-tlc cc Ictvt: dip for the upper portion of the Supai formation to be t t:... ' t ’: *-U- to d o ototo.-or fv r ri C 2 • 0 : : toward the south and southwest. Three cross-bedding studies ;" t.;ctc tcyo o:t:.-'0/.t:o.a of tot.-, t:-,t-tt:;'’r.;: v,, in upper Supai strata made by the writer show a southeasterly trv V.: t', at Co, ' “Co- trend in the average direction of dip (figs. 3, 4, and 5.) •• .'-"a c: r;t;tvcr -1 a ; r.ot„ 'Ctc ot- o C t t 47/7

/ - • - // W : :W : i - ! r u ,l,v ^ - r : ^ r r i 1 McKee ; divided the Sup&i f oraaticm dn Oak i Creek /Canyon / / .... '■/. . /-/ /' / : L / ' l ' ' lJ' J /'/ into three meaberi^ Member A consists of-the cliff—for^ng :: ) : ;/ - , / ; . 1 G upper sandstones;.‘member B is composed of ledge-slope forming •; ! ' I ' -7.n ■ 7 .7-7 r siltstones and sandstones; member C; isia massive cliff and r ;% ! ledge formed by the lower sandstones. . , . , ^ ''/•7 , , : - i ; 7 -7 ' r 7 .7 Winters recognizes four members in the Supai formation ! "1:7 : . •' " 7 r - ■' : ! ’■ I : ' in the Fort Apache-area farther east. These are the Corduroy, i >2 : ■ !:■ - i • ' i Fort Apache limestone. Big "A”, and Amos Wash members (fig.7), ?■ named for the localities where described. 7 The Corduroy * i h- , ^ i : : ■ - i member of Winters, ..the Fort Apache limestone of Stoyanow, and | 7-- Q~ v> ; ' . ' 7' ' f ■■ i ; the three members(of McKee are; recognized in the area studied ’ ;7J - : : i ’ : by the writer."-. ; ' : | xr : : : . At the' Fos'sill Creek locality. Winters* Corduroy member "2 ! 1 - is representedvt>y a sandstone facies, In the same area, the I Fort Apache limestone is much thinner than it is farther east, I l/j | : ;; . i but remains a limestone facies. The thinning of the Fort : I - | 3 : ‘ Apache limestone continues northwestward through the Oak ' : D- 5 . ' 7 " Creek Canyon section but at Sycamore Canyon still farther to "—j TT ' ! . : - the west it is^misslng (fig. 8 ). : The Big "A" and Amos Wash 1 -Ljj % ‘fr- •"... , •; • • t- , • : members of Winter a/are represented by an undiffermtlated sand : ! facies at Fossil Creek, probably the result of lateral grade-. < ' ■ ' - : V : • ' J ; tlon such as that in the Corduroy member above. The weak -e n ledge-slope topographic expression of the underlying at Fossil Creek has optimum development at Oak Creek; tbs term

Oak Greek member is retained for the Fossil Creek section.

VI V i i 1; " GENERALIZED SURA! SECTION Fi«- 8 S-EASTERN NEVADA ------FORT APACHE, ARIZONA

SPRING MTS. GRAND WASH NEVADA ARIZONA

GRAND CANYON BLACK STATION MESA

______' - ' ' •* •*—*• »/. *.• ; * • '* C~°r^U-'0)rJ***

t~r Limeetene It-Vv'yj Sondstone Dote for western portion of distrain from E. D. McKee, | silttton* a Mudstone pereenel eommwnleetlow. Formotlome above Svpel B Hermit shale not shown. 49

The Packard ranch member has optimum expression and development at Sycamore Canyon, and la recognizable both at

Oak Creek Canyon amd at Fossil creek, although not at Fort

Apache. Winters found a clear separation of the Amos Wash member and the Naco formation in the Fort Apache area.

Figure 8 represents a generalized section of the Supal formation from Spring Mountains, Nevada, to Fort Apache,

Arizona. The traverse of figure 8 is shown as a broken line on the index map (fig. 1). The facies changes in the members of the Supai are readily apparent, though some of the relation­ ships laterally across this area are open to question. ’

PENNSYLVANIAN-FERMIAN RELATIONSHIPS1

Huddle and Dobrovolny— / place the contact of the

Huddle, J. W. , and Dobrovolny, E., idem. : ,

Pennsylvanian Naco limestone and the overlying'Supal formation above a sequence of gray limestone and shale beds, and below

a sequence of beds consisting of sandstone, shale and some limestone. In Winters* opinion, this is an arbitrary division which unnaturally divides a continuous sequence of similar lithology and faunal assemblage. Winters raises the Pennsyl­

vanian-Permian boundary 410 feet above that proposed by

Huddle and Dobrovolny. The uppermost bed of the Naco of

Winters is a gray, thin-bedded limestone, ripple-marked and

fossiliferous. This limestone is overlain by gray and reddish 50 brown claystones which grade upward into non-calcareous alltstone and sandstone beds. j

Through the Identification of Tusullnids, Winters establishes a Virgil (latest Pennsylvanian) age for the upper Waco. This Is especially Interesting upon consideration of the fauna found farther west. The highest foaslllferou# ; stratigraphic unit of the Waco at Fossil Creek yields fossils of Des Moines age (flgi 7). Both this zone and that repre­ sented by the Fort Apache limestone (Permian)above serve as approximate time planes from Fossil Creek to Fort Apache. The lithologic assemblages between these zones clearly Indicate conditions of off-lap or regression during late Pennsylvanian- - early Peraiah time. ' C2 :;; < ^ .v : r •" ■; ^

Whether transgressive or regressive deposits fom-in any area normally depends upon relative rates of sinking and sedimentation^/; When sinking predominates, there is trans-

65/7.. Sears, Hunt, said Hendricks, Transgressive and regressive deposits in southern San Juan Basin, New Mexico, TJ. S. Qeol. Survey, Prof. Paper 193-F, p. 104, 1938.

*************^^ » V . ^ . - . r / t ^ ^ -6- , ^ * 1 -• , • ^ S. _ ' v‘ • . t. % - ^ v : gresslon; when sedimentation predominates, regressive deposits are the result. Thus, the regressive deposits of Pennsylvanian-

Permian age in the Fossil Creek-Fort Apache area Indicate a dominance of sedimentation over basin sinking.

Hughes^/ reports Lower Pennsylvanian fossils from the

ee/ ; Hughes, P. W. , idem, pp. 54-36. : r ; 51

Black Mesa area near Chino Valley and expresses belief that the fossiliferous member thickens to the west. Conditions of marine off-lap exist in western Arizona (fig. 8 ), a con­ dition resulting from a regressive Pennsylvanian sea similar to that shown in the eastern half of Arizona.

The Packard ranch'member of the Supai formation, arenaceous at the type locality, is more calcareous eastward. Buddie ■ ’ . — ; ' : gw/ ' ' ' , ' , and Dobrovolny— ' acknowledge that the Naco and Supai form-

677 ' ' Buddie, J. W. , and Dobrovolny, E., idem. 1 ations may interfinger in some parts of Arizona. A means of establishing correlation between contemporary facies, regardless of their lithologic differences, is the intertonguing of dis- ' • - :: : ■ : : - % . 6 a / ; : ■ • tinct facies as seen in the outcrop— . It is suggested here

557 Dunbar, C. 0., A study in facies, Geol.Soc.Amer. Bull., Vol. 52, pp . 313—332, 1941. that the Packard ranch member is an example of this Inter­ tonguing. The Packard ranch member is not represented at - port Apache (fig, 7); the Amos Wash member of Winters contains no limestones, prom the foregoing it appears that the Packard ranch member of Oak creek and Fossil Creek intertongues with the Naco of Winters. It is evident, therefore, that the Packard ranch member of the Supai formation is of a Pennsylvanian age.

It is further suggested that the siltstone interval of the Oak

Creek member at Fossil Creek is represented by the limestone 52

facies of Winters' upper naco at Fort Apache. The off-lap facies change of sandstone to siltstone to limestone within the limiting Apache and Das Moines time planes is a factor favoring this suggestion.

In a discussion of recent deltas, Russell and Russell— /

W Russell, R. J., and Russell, R. D., Mississippi, River Delta sedimentation (Part 3, Deposits associated with strand line), Symposium, "Recent Marine Sediments", Am. Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, 1939...... :... 1 state that the most characteristic feature of large deltas appears to be the intertonguing of marine and continental sediments plus a thickened section in the zone of inter­ tonguing, the latter resulting from combined subsidence and deposition in the distal portion of the subaerial delta. The greater thickness of the Fossil Creek section (fig. 7) is, perhaps, a result of this Intertonguing of the continental andmarine sediments. From figure 8 it is evident that from theiSycamore Canyon locality eastward, the continental deposits ofr sand and silt begin to intermingle with the marine sedi­ ments farther east.

Yn-?: - Summary and conclusions

The Supai formation of central Arizona is an advancing deltaic deposit from the north of Pennsylvanian-Permian age which has caused a regression of the Pennsylvanian sea toward the south and southeast due to sedimentation exceeding sub­

sidence in the area. 53

Subdivision of the Supai formation in central Arizona into members of considerable areal extent is recommended.

The Packard ranch and Oak Creek members as outlined in this report are equivalent to the upper part of the Uaco formation as described by Winters, and are considered

Pennsylvanian in age. : ; ^ ^

, u/:: FAUNAL LISTS FOR LOCALITIES

j . ■ : :.V', ;f ’ i' J The faunas eolleeted .from the:f©Hewing localities

contain both,ai*gh#atlhjaa&?tfahslf6ry forms. The Des

Moines indicial forms are shown below with an asterisk (*).

Identification of fossils was made through comparison with

illustrations and written descriptions after Shimer and

Shrock22/ and Dunbar and' Condra^^. r

207 Shimer and Shrook, Index fossils of North America, Technology Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1944.

2 jL/ . Jy." 1 on Dunbar and Gondra, Brachiopoda of the Pennsylvanian System in Nebraska, Nebraska Ueol. Survey, Bull.- 5,, Sec;:-2, 1932. *3791011

.■■■v :::y. '".r: l'Vi' • or .-.i.’:-'-'-r ;;-^7 .::ly ■-v y The faunal suites collected by the writer during the field

seasonrare deposited with the Museum of Northern Arizona, Flag­

staff- Arizona...... — . :.y: y y : l : ' VO;' j ■ - c % y yy :.;y‘ ' FOSSIL CREEK

' : . 7,:’' - •* ■: l : IV Chonetes sp. : : 2. Composita ovata 3. composite subtlllta - . . 4.; Delocrinus ofr subhemlsphericus . 5 • #ueulinias•(not sectioned) 6;"^Mnopgoduottts:;:of-g7prattenianus 7. Lophophy 11idium sp., , - o» MarginIfera ofr ~murlcatina 9. Neosplrifer cfr earneratus 10. splrlfer occidentalism 11. Spiriter rockymontahus* 55

KOHL RANCH LOCALITY

_ 1 * perbya ap. (fragments) . --, 2; ; Li noproduct us efr, pratt enlanua > u : :ro 3«. dplrlfer rocEymbntanus^ = ••••.; 1 v.r>• „ . f u .stems '-

H, . A c::' y-yi/zc or j - LOCALITY'

...... "iv • ComposIta byata1-0--- T ' ; : ' 2 : domposita' sufatlllta , 3. Horn porals (poor preservation) *•"" '' — ' * •- ' " • i • , • -- - : -• ’ * *■ 3 >■ •• . *' j . » 1 ■*-- v ' - Cl": ' ' < 1*1 U .1 L 4 .

V • - . L '» - * , » v. , c 1M03 WASH L0UAL1TY 7- - *. U : t; \ •- 1 . ,7. Tcy, 1 Location ■' c'nn'':'V7 ': " " C " ■ Iloilo' ’-W-' — 33°44>20" N " ' ' ' ' *' - ■ ' r -‘•■v ’ »- - •, ., ■ ' » - L / V , __ ‘ The Amos wash locality of Winters^/ was visited by the .• ' - i--.-..i • rcr cc-Le, c. . - i::,c w Winters, ti. a ., idem. ID': 1

- \ ..y 7^ r _ f; 7! C 7 V;T.:7 writer and the following fauna was collected and identified:

uv-.a !.u. < Chonetes sp . > & l C'zo: c --tcctir-r - 2. Composite - ovate' ^ ^c-r.T z-i .=. ai.L '’c-t v .:;- .v, ; composllm subtllita'-- -- n:'ui c-;- PrcX 4.f Berpya so. (fragments) Kohlnoconchua semipunctatus* ^ - 6. ‘ifennesteliids inot 'Identified) -- X ; cl I : ; 7 P - 7 Llnoproductus prattenianu# :-ru' c - Pucv;-v::n • v . r o:: g # Margin if era of r muricatlna 9. keospirlfer efr cameratua , tl; t T '»7 ?•--'-lOv.. < ( ^ dpirlfer rockymontanus*’' :i •=.* P ’ ^ > ' -- ■ ^ ^ V x. -* -.7, . C * ^ v ■, ^ w A 7 *. ^ % -4 -w* w*-.JL x. '4 ^ * -7 ^*j» - ■, > - < ' » ' i . -.*JJ 4. l-rqi-ublishod;, ’Pr.ivrv.-ii-v of 7

7 o; :.r ior t A. , Chet:,v:: r. " : ... % ctJ.-.ofri o-Cl::.:: u f chc ■: -.oc'.-c/f c f;i ifc. c <. " c-:A: ; ■ or v f c Vr:' ror Wi'-i-i, A Pt-ur, uf:-:-!, . "/o'. A/, ;0 / ■ -«

.n: X, r V 7 r. or 0:Pc, V Ore ? s no, 7 56

:o v.- BIBLIOGRAPHY

Dapples,C.", Krumbein, W. C ., and albas , L. L., Tectonic control of lithologic associations, Am..Assoc. Petroleum , -Geologists, Bull., vol. 32, .no. 10, 1948. , _ - : ;

Darton, N. H., A reconnaissance of parts of southwestern New Mexico and northern Arizona, u. t>. ueol. survey .._ J ^ U l l . 435 , 1910 ' . : r; V f ----- r— — — , A - resumef of Arizona geology, Univ.Arlz. * dol. Mines, Bull. 119, 1925.

Dunbar, :G. 0 ;, A study in facies', Gebl.‘ Sob. Amer. Bull., " v o i . 32; 1941; '■ " •'1 ‘ .-’ ■ - ' . •

— , and Gondra, Brachlopod# of the Pennsylvanian System in Nebraska, Nebraska Geoli, Survey', Dull. 5, Sec. 2, 1932. ^ J

Fenneman, N: M., Physiographic Provinces of western United States, McGraw-Hill Book uo., 1931.

Gutschiok, H. C.The Kedwall limestone, Ph.D thesis lin publication), Univ. of ill., 1942. ,; ' ' : ; . Hinds, N. JK. A. , sp-Archean and ep-Algonkian intervals in western North America, uarnegie Inst, wash., Publ. : 463, 1935; ; v r:/ "

Huddle, J. W., and Dobrovolny, B., Late Paleozoic stratigraphy and"oil,and.gas possibilities of central.and northwestern Arizonau. s. Geoli Survey,' Oil and Gas Invest. Prelim. . Chart 10, 1943. , 7

Hughes, P; W., History of the Supai formation in Black Mesa, Yavapai County. Arizona.' Plateau. Museum of Northern Arizona, Vol. 22, ho. 2, 1 H ? *

— — , The stratigraphy of the Supai formation in the Chino Valley area, Yavapai County.Arizona,.MS thesis (unpublished), University of Arizona^ 1950.

J ohnston r*:w. A . ,. Charac t ef of t h e . s t r a t if i cat ion of "the: V::' : sediments in the recent delta of the Fraser River, B . C.‘, Jour.' Geol., Vol. 30, no 2, 1922.

Kryninej P.-D., The origin' of hed bbds, Trans^'N^ Y. Acadi ' Set.; Series II, Vol. 2, no. 3, 1949. 57

Longwell, Cv R., Geology of the Muddy Mountains, Nevada, U. S. Geol. Survey, 798> 1928.

McKee, B. D;1, The Coconino sandstone, Carnegie?ihst. of : - = Wash., Publ. No. 440j 19J4. ' ’ ^ :

— ------— — , Three types of cross-lamination in Paleozoic rooks of "'Northern Arizona, A m e r . Jour. of Sci., Vol. 238, 1940. ’ :: r: ;; v : - • v:';- •■■■' in — ---— ^ Classification and interpretation of cross-- lamination, (abstract): Bull.,'Geol. aoc. Am,, Vol. 99, : P . 1378, 1946...... : . .

Noble, L. F., The Shinumo quadrangle, Grand Canyon district, Arizona, U. S. Gaol. Survey, Bull., 949, 1914.

— — A section of the Paleozoic formations of the Grand Canyon at the Bass Trail, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 131-B, 1922. . - - ' ; ; ' • I :

Payne, T. G., Stratigraphical analysis and environment reconstruction, Bull. AmL Assoc. Petroleum Geologists, Vol. 26, no. 11, 1942. - • : '

Ran some, ■*. L., Geology and ore deposits of the Bisbee " quadrangle, Arizonaj U . S . Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 21, 1904. .

— — ------— , Some Paleozoic sections of Arizona and their correlation, U. S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 98K, 1916.

Reiche, P'.An analysis of cross-lamination: > The*Coconino sandstone, Jour. Geol., Vol. 46, no. 7, 1938. '<-U , i:.- - .. r v;;.;. . : v "'s: '■ r;. y Russell, h. j;, and RussellMississippi River delta sedimentation (Part 3k, Deposits associated with ■strand line), Symposium, "Recent Marine Sediments", Am. Assoc; Petroleum Geologists, 1939. :..V n .

Sears, Hunt, and Hendricks, Transgressive and regressive Cretaceous deposits in southern San Juan Basin, New Mexico, XT. S. Geol. Survey, Prof. Paper 193-F, 1938.

Shimer, H. W., and Shrock, &., Index Fossils of North America, Technology Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1944.

Smith, H. V., The climate of Arizona, Univ. Arlz. Col. A g r ., Bull. 197, 1949. 58

Stoyanove, A. A., Certain aspects of Devon!c in Arizona (abstract): Pan-Am. Geol.; Vol. 53, no. 4, 1930.

- ** . . ^ , . ------— , Correlation of Arizona Paleozoic formations, Geol. Soo. Am. Duii . t Tol. 47, no. 4, 1936.

------———, Paleozoic paleogeography of Arizona, ^eol. Soc. •%!. Bull., Vol. 53, no. 9, 1942.

Tomlinson, C. W., A study of the conditions of origin of the permo-Carboniferous and Triassic red beds of the western United States, Jour. Geol., Vol. 24, 1916.

Twenhof el, W. H., and Tyler, -4. s Methods of study of sediments, McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1941.

Weir, Gordon W., Geologist, Minerals Branch, U. s. Geol. Survey, personal communication, 1951.

Wentworth, 0. K i , Methods of mechanical analysis of sediments, Univ. of Iowa Studies, Vol. 11, no. 11, 1926.

White, David, Study of the fossil floras in the Grand uanyon Arizona, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Yearbook 27, 1927-28.

-— •— — ■— -» Flora of the Hermit shale, Grand Ganyon, Arizona, Carnegie Inst. Wash. Publ. 405, 1929.

Wilson, 35. D . , Proterozoic Mazatzal quartzite of central Arizona, Pan-Am. Geol., Vol. 38, no. 4, 1922.

----- ———, Pre-Cambrian Mazatzal revolution in central Arizona, Geol. Soc. Am., Bull., Vol. 50, 1939.

Winters, S. a., Ph.D. thesis (unpublished) Columbia University, and personal communication, 1950.

"Rock-color chart", Prepared by the Rock-color chart committee.. Distributed by the National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1948. 59

DESCRIPTION OF MEASURED SECTIONS

HORSE MESA SECTION ; V: 111045»15M W — 34o45«40n N i r ; Measured,by R. L. Jackson ' ■ v;,; ~ ; A ;; a ; ; ;:;v, A a ’ - l i ro Feet i V ' : -■ ** j: ?. . ' '• /. - -■ Li:/.: : •i’ -> v •• »> 1- * e ww ;r; :a. Tertiary basalts f ' " . ■ ? ^ *#■;-' * .1 ’ " " 1 ■ • ’ ",;, t A ;; '• /' v": Supai-Tertiary basalt contacts eroatonal unconformity of low relief (3* - 5*)• . ' / i : ' • • •’ . • . -'A Supai formation; "A* menber (after McKee); ; A. 23. Sandstones .light .brown; fine-grained; cement weak, friable, weakly calcareous; medium-scale . cross-laminations; weathers smooth rounded; forms cliff *, • #■ *'••••• . •...... * . . .« . # 70.0 22. Sandstone; light brown; very fine-grained; cement weak, calcareous; very-thin irregular — ... bedding; base gradational; forms cliff. . . . * 30.0 21. Sandstone; same lithology as unit # 20, but forms rounded cliffs. *- •' • . •■ •> * . « ;.■ • • 193.0 20. Sandstone; light brown; very fine-grained; cement weak; irregular thin - lw) bedding; weathers smooth; fprms long rolling slope • • • 302.0 19. Concealed: long flat slope...... 38.5 A . -• ;'A ; ;■ ... : A. - :X. 'V V A

■-"A" a :l - . A . . -,cv.; : : • A l,. Total incomplete "A" member 633.5

mB w member (after McKee); 18. Sandstones light brown; very fine-grained; , A , v medium-scale cross-laminations etch out; weathers smooth; forms prominent cliff1 . • • • 16.5 17. Sandstone; very pale orange; very fine-grained; cement weak, calcareous; thin flat bedding; weathers smooth; forms slope...... • 1.0 16. Sandstone: same as unit # 11, except bedding •&rt - 2 ’; forms ledge slope...... ••••• 72.5 15. Sandstone; same as unit # 9 • • • • ...... 5.5 14. Conglomerate: same as ualtKL2 . v ...... 1.0 13. Sandstone: same as unit # 9 • • • • • . • • • . 22.0 12. Conglomerate: Matrix; Siltstone; pale reddish brown; A cement firm, non-calcareous; argillaceous material common; Gravel: Limestone and siltstone pebbles (1/8" - ); subrounded; Unit forms weak gnarly ledge. ••••...... 1.0 11. Sandstone: pale reddish brown; very fine­ grained; thin flat bedding; cement firm, non­ calcar eous; forms ledge ...... 16.5 60

Feet y r 10. Gonglomerate: same as unit # 1 2 ...... 3.0 9. Sandstone:1pale red; very fine-grained; cement weak, calcareous; medium-scale cross- laminations weathers fissile; forms slope • 11.0 8. Sandstone: light brown; very fine-grained; cement weak, non-calcareous; bedding thin, irregular;, weathers' smooth rounded; forms rolling slope . ’...... 20.0 7. Siltstone: pale reddish brown; bedding flat thin, irregular; cement firm, non- calcareous; weathers rounded forms ledge- slope 1 :. V ; ...... ' . .* . 16.5 6; Concealed:. . . ."...... 13.5 5. Sandstone: pale reddish brown; very fine-' grained; cement firm,*non-calcareous; small mudstone parting ) between beds, bedding irregular^ thin; base gradational; forms small ■ ledge; i .•' . • .: . -... • 8.0 4. Conglomerate; : : ^ Matrix: siltstone: pale red; cement weak, non-calcareous; ’l. Gravel: Limestone and siltstone pebbles (^" - 8") rounded to subrounded; unit forms weak: ledge . . . i . 3.0 3. Sandstone; pale reddish brown; very fine-' grained; cement weak, nbn-calcarecus;.thin irregular bedding; small (^”) nodule inclusions common; forms weak ledge ) . . . 1 8.0 2. Conglomerate; same as unit # 4; member is lenticular; contains scour channels sees 5.0 1. Concealed; base of section; rolling irregular flat, v

Total incomplete "B"; mmber 224.0

- , • ' ' - . , . - ' * "4 * *, * -’1 - * ""k Total section thickness 857.5 ■n- .7- > ; - -■**. . • v . v. " -: . y yyu

, : v 61

PAVER CREEK SECTION : . 111°41’20" W — 34®40 * 50** N Measurediby R. L. . Jackson

Tertiary basalt: . ; ; :

Supai-Tertiary basalt contacts erosional unconformity of low relief (3* - 5’). '

Supai formations \ mA w member (after McKee)s .a -: • : 23. Concealed: basalt talus covered slope. . . 30.0 22. Sandstones same as unit # 18 ...... 36.0 21. Siltstones same as unit # 1 6 ...... 8.0 20. Sandstones same as unit # 18 ...... 10.0 19• Sandstones same as unit # 14 ...... 22.0 18. Sandstones moderate orange brown; fine­ grained; cement weak, non-calcareous; - ; medium-scale cross-laminations; weathers smooth, bloeky; forms cliff...... • 10.0 17. Sandstones same as unit # 14 . . . . . • • 44.0 16. Siltstone, light brown; mottled gray to ■ • white in part; cement weak, calcareous; bedding massive; exfoliates upon weathering; forms vertical cliff . . ■ ...... "v. . . 8.0 15. Sandstones moderate orange brown; medium- grained; cement weak, friable, non-cal­ careous; weathers gnarly, forms ledge. • • 1.0 14. Sandstone: moderate reddish orange; medium-grained; small-scale cross- laminations grade upward into medium- - > scale cross-laminations; weathers smooth rounded; forms cliff ..••• ...... 66.0 13. Sandstone: same as unit #11. . • . . . • 32.0 12. Sandstones light gray; cement weak, friable, calcareous; medium-grained; weathers smooth founded; forms small ledge ...... 0.5 11. Sandstones moderate reddish orange; medium-grained; cement firm, calcareous; bedding massive; exfoliates upon weathering; contains small irregular lenses of gray siltstone at base; weathers rounded; bedding irregular; forms cliff...... 11.0 10. Sandstones same as unit # 7...... • 16.5

Total "A" member 295.0 62

Feet

"B* member (after McKee)$ . 9. Siltatone: same as unit #1...... 41.0 8. Sandstone: light gray; medium- to fine­ grained; cement weak, non-calcareous, friable; bedding massive; weathers smooth -rounded; forms ledge . . . . v . . . . ^ . 2.0 7, Sandstone: moderate orange brown; fine- to very fine-grained; cement weak, non- calcareous; contains calcite seams (&") nozmal to bedding; small-scale cross- ' laminations; weathers rounded; forms ’ ledge. . V ...... , . . . . 11.0 6. Siltstone: same as unit # 1...... 22.0 5 • silt a tone: light gray; c ement firm, non-' calcareous; thin bedded - 2n) weathers smooth rounded; exhibits jointing; forxas *• ledge...... V . 16.5 4. Mudstone: grayish purple; thin> izregular bedding; grades upward into grayish green ' mudstone; weatiwrs hackly; forms slope . . 8.0 3. Siltstone: same as unit # 38.0 2. Siltstone: grayish green; thin bedded; ' cement weak, calcareous; forms slope • • • ‘ 0.5 1. Siltstone: moderate orange grown; thin irregular bedding; cmnent weak, non-cal­ careous ; weathers rounded; forms slope . . 4.5

Total Incomplete member , . " • -* ■- . w 4? ‘5 4 •*-

* ■; < '-i- 'r C * w ^

.-r : f; ■ ■ _ n 63

WEST CLEAR CREEK SECTION : 111°40»22" W — 34°32»20« H Measured by R. L. Jackson . . . aa s , Tertiary basalt: ' . "■/ - : ' "

Supal-Tertiary basalt contactt eroslonal unconformity of low relief (3* - 5*). -

Supal formation: ; ■ ”AW member (after McKee)j . 27. | Concealed: basalt talus covered slope . V . 55.0 26. Sandstone: paULe reddish brown and light gray In alternating poorly defined b ands; fine- to very fine-grained; cement weak, ; calarebus; medium- to large-scale cross- laminations; cliff and ledge forming. . . . 220.0 25. Sandstone: yellow!sh gray; medium-grained; cement weak, calcareous; small-scale cross-laminations; forms ledge. > . . . • • 1.0 24. Sandstone: same as unit # 22...... • • 38.5 23. 81Itatone: pale reddish brown; cement weak, highly calcareous; bedding irregular thin, gnarly; base gradational; forms ledge . .; . 6w0 22. Sandstone; pale reddish brown; ;yery fine- grained; cement weak, highly calcareous; medium-scale cross-laminations; forms -V- r rounded cliff ...... v . .; 27.5 21. Sandstone: very pale orange; fine-grained; cement weak, non-calcareous; bedding massive; forms ledge. • • • . . . . • • • • 6.0 20. Concealed: forms slope. • . . . . . • . • • 5.0 19. limestone (port Apache limestone of Stoyanow); light olive gray; dolomltic limestone; thin beds at base (1-2*) separated by siltstone layers, thicker bedding ( 3* ) at top; weathers blocky; forms vertical cliff...... 10.0 18. Sandstone: light gray; fine-grained; cement weak, non-calcareous; bedding flat, thin; forms regular slope ...... 8.0 17. Sandstone: same as unit # 15. ••••••• 5.0 16. Siltstone: same as unit # 14. ..••••• 27.5 15. Sandstone: light brown; fine-grained; T V cement firm, non-calcareous; small-scale cross-laminations; forms rounded cliff• • * 4.0 14. Siltstone; light brown; cement weak, non- calcareous; alternating very-thin bedding and small-scale cross—laminated units; forms ledge ...... 27.5 64

Feet

13. Sandstones pale reddish brown; very fine­ grained; cement firm, non-calcar eons; flat thick bedded; forms ledge...... 4.0 12. Sandstone s same as unit # 4 ...... 10.0 11. Sandstones light brown; fine-grained; cement firm, highly calcareous; thin bedded; forms rounded cliff .' . •> . v:. . • 2.0 10. Sandstones same as unit # 7 • . . . . . • • 8.0 9. Sandstone: same as .unit # 3 • . . 5.0 8. Sandstones same as unit: # .4 • J...... 5.0 7. Sandstone: pale reddish brown; very fine­ grained; cement weak, calcareous; medium- scale cross-laminations; forms rounded cliff . . ;...... 10.0 6. Sandstone; same as unit # 3...... 3.0 5. Sandstones same as unit # 4 excepting bedding, which is fissile to very-thin. • • 1.0 4. Sandstones pale reddish brown; very fine­ grained; cement weak, weakly, calcareous; thin bedded, gnarly; forms rounded ledge. . 3.0 3. Sandstones pale reddish brown; very fine­ grained; cement weak, calcareous; thin, ; irregular bedding; forms rounded cliff. • • 22.0 2. Mudstone: pale yellowish brown; bedding thin, gnarly; base irregular; forms recess. :...... : ...... • • • 2.0 1. Dolomitic limestones platy; pale yellowish brown; bedding flat, thin; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge, base concealed • • • 2.0

Total measured section 518.0 65

FOSSIL CREEK SECTION 111034«14" W — 34*25*14" N _ Measured by r . L, Jackson ; ^ v;:-...-;;- -:V : V : r ; , Feat Coconino Sandstones;

Sandstone s very pale brown, very fine-grained, friable; shows compound cross-bedding on large scale to base; clear even-grained : quarts grains; weathers to light yellow­ er ish brown; forms massive cliff, , . «

Supai-Coconino contacts (placed at top of uppermost flat-bedded red slltstone) Surface ,; level where observed.

Supai formation: . v r-r... Corduroy sand facies members . : . - . 88. Sandstones Moderate reddish orange; very fine-grained; clear and stained quarts . grains, black detrltails rare; weathers : - smooth; cement calcareous; forms vertical cliff . . . ., ...... ; • . . . . 75.0 87. Sandstones light gray, weathers darker; : very fine-grained; clear and frosted quarts ; grains; cement weakly calcareous; cross- »■ bedded on a small scale; forms, cliff . . - continuous with unit # 88 ...... 40.0 86. Sandstones reddish orange, weathers , . . . . ' ■ v. reddish brown; stained quartz grains, ; black detrltals common; bedding massive;... base flat; cement weakly calcareous; r forms irregular ledge ...... 60.0 85. Sandstone: same as unit # 87. • . • • • • . 20.0 84. Sandstones same as unit #88...... • • 22.0 83. Calcareous siltstones reddish orange brown; thin, irregular bedding; highly calcareous; v weathers rounded; forms rounded cliff • • • 10.0 82. Calcareous siltstones light brown; thin,; irregular bedding; highly calcareous; weathers smooth rounded; forms steep ledge slope combination ;*...... 105.0 81. Calcareous siltstones same as unit # 8 3 . . 10.0 80. Calcareous siltstones same as unit # 8 2 • • 20.0

Total Corduroy sand facies member 362.0 66

Feet

Fort Apache limestone; 79. Limestone* light gray# weathers darker; ; ' aphanltlc; thin bedded; traces of fossils, preservation extremely poor; weathers ; hackly; forgs vertical cliff, v ...... 20.0 78. SiItstone: light gray; non-calcareous ‘ ^ - ‘ cement; flat bedded; weathers smooth; forms slight recess v . . ... • 12.0 77. Argillaceous limestone: yellowish gray; • argillaceous material abundant; thin bedded; forms ledge • . • • • ...... 6.0

Total port Apache limestone 38.0

Big "A" sand facies member; - ^ 76. SiItstone: same as unit # 72. • • • . . . . 115.0 75. SiItstone: light gray; non-calcareous; thin bedded; forms cliff...... 5.0 74. Slltatone: same as unit # 72. • • • • • . . 106.0 73. Concealed: steep slope. . . .- • . . . . • • 85.0 72. SiItstone: reddish brown; non-calcareous; thin bedded/ fissile in part; mottled appearance in part; forms steep ledge- slope ;v . . v .- . . . . . v . . 44.0 71. Siltstone: same as unit # 63. . . . • . . . 6.0 70. Siltstbhe: same as unit # 66.' . • •••• • 2.0 69. Slltstone: same as unit # 63. • • • • • . .’ 25.0 68. Slltstone: same as unit # 66. . ." . . . . 4.0 67. Slltstone: same as unit #63. • • . . • • • 10.0 66. Slltstone: moderate brown; noh-calcareoua; thin bedded; weathers smooth rounded; forms steep slope ...... / ...... 4.0 65. Slltstone: same as unit # 63. • . . . . . • ^ 65.0 64. Slltstone: pinkish gray; non-calcareous; bedding massive; weathers smooth rounded; forms ledge ...... * . • • ...... ’ .' 1.0 63. Slltstone: moderate brown; non-calcareous, bedding massive; weathers smooth rounded# forms cliff . . . .; ...... " 55.0 62. Slltstone: same as unit #61. • . . .. • . 12.0 61. Slltstone: pale reddish brown; non-calcare­ ous; thin Irregular bedding; weathers blocky; forms ledge . • V . • • . • .... 50.0

Total Big "A* sand facies member 589.0 Feet

Oak Greek member: , , - , t e , , r 60. Coneealedi steep slope. -...... 44.0 59 . Silt stone: grayi sh red; ;n6n-ealoare6us; bedding^irregular; partially concealed; forms ledge-slope . . ,...... 60.0 58. Sandstone! pale brown; very fine-grained; calcareous cement; thin to thick bedding, ( 2nt- l-J* ); weathers rov^h; :forms slope 53.0 57. conglomerate: . ' . .. , . , . ' lu. c . Matrixsmediumlight^graymudstone; V. v , v highly calcarous; weathers knobby; . : Gravel: limestone pebbles ( 1/8" - I ■ ;•); .light gray; subrounded to subangular;. - : unit weathers knobby, forms ledge-slope. 32.0 56. Sandstone: yellowish gray; highly cal­ careous, friable; thin, bedded; forms slope , . . ... , re; . . _; e • .. . • \ • ' • 10.0 55. Conglomerate: same -as unit # 57 • - • • , • 6.0 54. Concealed: irregular slope. •.. . • . . . • 10.0 53. Sandstone: pale reddish brown; very fine­ grained; highly calcareous; forms small V ,:: resistant ledge ...... , ‘r. 2.0 52. Concealed: long slope ...... 93.0 51. Siltstone; pale reddish broim; highly,cal­ J careous; friable; thin irregular bedding; / forms slope ••».'«« . . • ■.. • . . . , # . 15.0 50. Concealed; long slope ...... 68.0 49. Conglomerate: , . : ^ Matrix: siltstone; light brown; non- caloareous; weathers gnarly; Gravel: siItstone blocks and pebbles; reddish brown and light gray ( 1.-2" ); angular to subround; . unit weathers gnarly; forms slope ...... 6.0 48. Concealed: forms slope. • • ...... 25.0 47. Slltstone; pale reddish brown; calcareous cement; thin irregular bedding; forms , v slope: • ., • • 16.0 46. concealed: forms long slope .. . . . • • • 36.0

Total Oak Creek member 476.0

Packard ranqhn member: , . . , 45. Siltstone: same as unit # 35. . . . • . • • 42.0 44. Silty limestone: brownish gray; thin irregular bedding;, weathers gnarly; forms -r weak ledge...... 6.0 43, Slltatdaet same as unit # 35. . .:. * . . . 33.0 42. Limestones same as unit # 39...... 4.0 41. Siltstones reddish brown; calcareous cement; thin irregular bedding; weathers gnarly; forms slope . . . . . 6.0 40. Siltstones same as unit # 35. . . . \ . . 8.0 39• Limestone: light brownish:gray; aphanltlc; bedding flat, massiwe; weathers rounded; ■ f o m s ledge . . • « ’-i • • •«” • ’ • . . . -e -. *, 18.0 38. Conglomerates"same as unit # 36 . .. • • • 2.0 37. siItstone: same as unit ^35. . . . ^ ^ . . 31.0 36. Conglomerate; 1 : i Matrix: slltstbne; light reddish gray; highly calcsredus; Gravel: siltotone"; reddi^i brown pebbles (- lw ); subrounded- to rounded; ■ ’ Unit weathers gnarly; forms weak ledge. . . 3w0 35. Siltstones reddish brown; flat thin bedding; weathers smooth; forms'cliff. • . • . . . • 30.0 34. Limestone: light brownlgh gray; aphanitic; ' bedding flat^massive; weathers smooth rounded; foMis ledge. . . v . . . -. . '. . 5.5 33. Limestones grayish red; finely crystalline; medium-scale cross-laminatiphs etch out; « weathers blocky; forms cliff. • ...... 11.0 32. Concealed: forms slope. . . i . • . . • • 8.0 31. Sandstone; pale redd!sh brown; very fine­ grained; - small-scale cross-lamlhatiohs etch out; weakly calcareous; weathers blocky; forms ledge ...... ". . . . 3.0

Total tankards z»anctDn member - 210.5'

Haco limestone:

30. Siltstones reddish brown; calcareous cement; thin to thick bedding ( - l^1 ); weathers smooth; forms • cliff • • • s •...... 41.0 29. Siltstones light gray; non-calcareous; • medium-scale cross-laminations; laminae ; etch out; weathers smooth; firms cliff. • • 4.0 28. Siltstone: reddish brown, weathers to light brown; same as unit # 30. • • . • 4.0 27. Siltstones same as unit #29...... 4.0 26. Limestones gray; aphanitic to finely crystalline; bedding inregular; weathers gnarly; forms irregular ledge • .... . 16.0 6?

Feet

25. limestone: light gray; medium crystalline; * thin, irregular heading; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded; forms rounded . ledge ...... 5.0 24. Siltstohe; reddish brown; thin to thick . (2? - 4* ); calcareous cement; weathers ’ . blocky; base gradational; forms irregular cuff . v ...... 14.7 23. Concealed: forms slope...... • • 31.0 22. Conglomerate: Matrix:, argillaceous siltstone; light, - i gray; cement highly calcareous; ! ; Gravel; medium grained, to 1/4" in- . . i elusions, of siltstone, limestone, % ' , r quartz and chert, subrounded; bedding massive, weathers knobby; forms ,, ledge . .7...... ,...... ' 1.0 21. Limestone: gray; argillaceous material conmion; gnarly, irregular bedding;. ... weathers, knobby; forms weak ledge . . . . • 5.0 20. Siltstone; reddish brown, weathers darker; firm non-calcareous cement; Irregular thin bedding; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded;; forms irregular ledge...... 3.0 19. Concealed: talus covered slope. .,.; . ... •_ • 12.7 18. Siltstone; reddish.brown, weathers darker; cement firm, weakly calcarecus; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers blocky; forms vertical ledge...... 4.0 17. Silty limestone: grayish brown; very thin . bedding; base gradational; weathers knobby; forms weak irregular ledge...... 3.0 16. Concealed: talus covered slope. . • . . . • 10.7 15. Siltstone: reddish brown, weathers darker; cement firm, weakly calcareous; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded; mica inclusions common; forms ledge ...... 5.0 14. Conglomerate: same as unit # 1 2 ...... 16.0 13. Calcareous siltstone: grayish brown; cement firm, highly calcareous; flat irregular thin bedding; weathers blocky; forms ledgeV... 4.0 12. Conglomerate: Matrix: argillaceous silty limestone; light gray; cement firm, highly cal­ careous; : Gravel: argillaceous limestone and clay ~ galls ( ** - 2W ) subrounded; bedding gnarly; base sharp; Des Moines Molluscoidan fauna of good preservation, random orientation; unit forms ledge. • • • 20.0 70

Feet

11. Limestone: light gray, weathers orange brown; aphanitic; thick bedding ( 2* - 4* ); base sharp; unit contains siltstone partings; weathers blocky; forms vertical ledge • ...... 6.0 10. Conglomerate: same as unit # 12 • . • . . . 13.0 9. limestonegrayish pink; finely crystalline; bedding massive; foremlnlferal; base grad­ ational; weathers smooth rounded; forms • '■■■■ rounded ledge ...'. . . « ...... * . 2.0 8. Limestone; gray; aphanitic; argillaceous material common; bedded chert inclusions; * ■ thin bedded; weathers gnarly; forms ledge • 6.0 7. Conglomerate: same as unit # 22 ...... 32.0 6. Concealed: forms rolling slope. . • • • • • 32.0 5. Siltstone; reddish brown; calcareous cement; : thin bedded; forms ledge slope...... 30.0 4. Conglomerate: .Matrix; sandstone; reddish brown; coarse- to medium-grained; highly calcareous; Gravel: limestone, dolomltlc limestone, chert, Jasper and quartz pebbles; subrounded- 1^* ); • ' unit weathers gnarly; forms cliff . . . . • 30.0 3* Limestone, breccia:- grayish purple to mod­ erate red; irregular bedding; grades up-> < ward into unit # 4;argillaceous material abundant; weathers gnarly; forms irregular ledges. • . . . • . . . • • . . . . • . . . 6.0 2. Concealed: forms rolling slope. . . •" 53.0

Total Haco limestone 414.1

Redwall limestone:

1. Limestone; light gray; aphanitic to coarsely crystalline; massive at base of section; becomes thinner bedded toward top; weathers pitted; base concealed; Mollusooldan fauna of poor preservation; forms vertical cliff. 85.0

Total incomplete Redwall * 85.0

Total section 2,174.6 71

SPADE RANCH SECTION . 1X1023104" W — 34024*02" N Measured:by R. L» Jackson ; - Feet " v.:v -vv:.: ^ Tertiary basalt: : > f Supal-Tertiary basalt contact: eroslonal unconformity of low relief (3* - 6*). -• >l Supal formations ’ /; a ? Corduroysandfaclesmember: 25. Concealed: steeptlmber studded slope; boulders of basalt from above ...... 187.0 . . 24. Concealed: forms light gray sandy soil; steep slope # . ■ ■. . ■ ^ . . * ■■. . . . . 6.5 23. Concealed: forms red sandy soil; steep - ■* ■ - - ’ slope ■ w - ...... « . • . . . . 55.0

Total Incomplete corduroy sand facies member 259.5

Fort Apache limestone of Stoyanow: • 22. Siltstones yellowish gray; cement firm, calcareous; calclte Inclusions common; bedding massive; weathers smooth rounded; forms continuous cliff with units # 21 and ' i " e - e :' " #" -^ e # * # ' # - \ m - e' . ' ' - . ' # -- # - # # ■ r • : • # * 17.5 . 21. lime stone: olive gray; medium crystalline; solution type smooth rounded weathering;* ■ forms vertical cliff...... 5.5 20. Silty limestones light olive gray; aphanitic; weathers smooth rounded; forms vertical > cliff...... 11.0

Total Fort Apache lime stone of Stoyanow 34.0

- - - . .* -i, i- •. . i ^ 5 *' T . - J ■ Big WAH sand facies membOTs « » 19. Si It stone s moderate brown; cement weak, calcareous; bedding irregular -massive; forms,rounded ledges• • . . • . . . . % 105.0 18. Sandstones light olive gray; very fine- ' grained; cement weak, highly calcareous; thin. Irregular bedding (&* - 6"); forms l e d g e ...... 6.0 17. Sandstones same as unit # 16 (no geodes or delicate color changes)• • . • • • • • i 18.0 72

. . . '

16. Sandstone: moderate brown; fine-grained; cement fira, calcareous; calcite geodes (i") common; delicate color changes to light gray localized in spots; bedding irregular, massive; forms ledge-slope • • • 16.5 15 * ■ Concealed ...... # = ...... 33.5 14. Sandstone: moderate brown; very fine­ grained; cement weak, highly calcareous; bedding massive; weathers smooth rounded; f or ms weak ledge...... « . • . . 6.0 13*. Concealed: st eep slope ••••••• • • • 231.0

Total Big ”AW sand facies member 421.0

Oak Creek member: ^ : . 12. Sandstone: same as unit #. 10...... 6.0 11. concealed ...... 11.0 10. Sandstone; moderate brown; very fine- r grained; cement weak, non-calcareous; thin irregular bedding; forms ledges. . . • 22.0 9. Siltstone: same as unit # 7 (no inclus­ ions) ...... 30.5 8. Concealed ...... 27.5 7. Si It stone: grayish red; cement weak. highly calcareous; irregular thin (#*) , . r : bedding; calcite inclusions common; forms weak ledge...... ^ ...... 8.5 6. Siltstone; grayish red; cement firm, ; highly, calcareous; thin irregular bedding; weathers gnarly; forms ledge-slope. . . . • 27.5 5. Concealed • ••••...• ... • • • • . 49.5 4. Sandstone: pale brown; very fine-grained; cement firm, highly calcareous; thin flat . bedding; weathers smooth rounded; foras ledge-slope . . . • . . • . . .. . • . • • 16.5 3. Concealed...... • • • . . • 22.0 2. Sandstone; pale reddish brown; very fine­ grained; cement firm, highly calcareous; bedding irregular massive; weathers smooth blocky; forms cliff ...... • • 29.5 1. Concealed: base of section; valley fill and boulders from units above.

Total incomplete Big nA* sand facies member 250.5

Total complete section 965.0 73

WASHINGTON PARK SECTION 111o 16«10" W — 34086*09" N Measured by R. L. Jackson . zset Supai formation* Corduroy sand facies members 14. Samdstohei light broim; fine-grained; cement weak, non-calcareous; bedding flat, irregular very-thin (&" - 4"); weathers gnarly; forms cliff ...... 82.5 13. Sandstones light brown; fine-grained; cement firm, non-calcareous; very-thick bedded; medium-scale cross-laminations etch out; - - forms sheer cliff ...... 44.0 12. Sandstones moderate reddish brown; medium- to fine-grained sandstone; cement weak, calcareous; thick bedding (4* - 8*); medium- scale cross-laminations etch out; weathers blocky; forms Irregular cliff ...... 72.0 11. Concealed; series of rolling slopes ...... 192.0 10. Sandstones moderate yellowish brown; fine­ grained; cement firm, calcareous; bedding massive; weathers smooth rounded; forms small ledge ...... 5.5 9. Concealed; steep slope...... • . • • 55.0 8. Siltstones light olive gray; thin flat ' bedding; forms blocky ledge 5.5 7. Sandstone* dusky yellow; very fine-grained; cement weak, highly calcareous; bedding massive, irregular; contains calclte inclus­ ions; forms slope . . • • . . • • • . . • . . 16.5 6. Siltstones light olive gray; cement firm, z. calcareous; thin to thick ( 6* - 2* ) irreg­ ular bedding; weathers smooth rounded to gnarly; forms ledge ...... 12.0 5. Siltstones moderate brown; cement firm, non- calcareous; thin to thcik irregular bedding; ■' weathers smooth rounded; ledge forming. • • • 10.0 4. Concealed; rolling slope...... 48.5

c u - Total Incomplete Corduroy sand facies member 543.5

Fort Apache limestone of Stoyanows 3. Siltstones olive gray; cement firm, highly calcareous; contains calclte inclusions and small geodes - &*); weathers smooth rounded; forms rounded cliff. ....»••• 17.5 1 *J

Feet

2. limestone: olive gray; me&lem crystalline; flat bedded, massive; pitted solution-type weathering; forms cliff with units # 1 and # 2 ...... 11.0 1. Siltstone: light olive gray; cement firm, calcareous; bedding flat thick (2*); weathers smooth, bloeky; units # 1, 2; and 3 grade into one another; forms cliff.V • • . 5.5

Base of section is a steep timber studded Slope. ’ -i \ ' . ■. : v,:,-'::;;; y- X'! r :> 1 : ::

~ Total port Apache limestone 34.0 • •- • * 1, • ^ - s r ■ - * — - - • ^ „ l , , ..! "V . , 5„ % a t ^ ■*

Total section thickness ‘ 577.5 - r ... *

h 'i v.'

" i * L

- ;,n ; r:-; - .l.V

i. v r

% . - 75

KOHL RANCH SECTION , ...... 1 H ° 0 5 »2Bn W -- ,34°19«32« N v . Measured .by R. L. . Jaok'soa..

N&eo ; ; ; % : \ ' ' ' - . .

18. Silty limestone: pale yellowish brown;- r aphanltic; thin Irregular bedding; chert nodules (2* - 3") occur along bedding planes; base gradational;,weathers smooth rounded; forms Irregular ledge. . . . . , . 6.0 17. Sandstones pale brown; very fine-grained; cement firm, calcareous; bedding massive; base gradational; weathers smooth rounded; forms Irregular ledge ...... 3.0 16. Conglomerates Matrixs siltstone: moderate brown; cement firm, calcareous; Gravels limestone and siltstone pebbles (&" - 1") light gray and ^derate brown; subround; unit massive gnarly bedded; weathers knobby; forms irregular slope ...... 9.0 15. Si It stone: pale reddish brown; cement firm, calcareous; fissile to very-thin bedding; inclusions of chert and siltstone nodules ( i n - 4") abundant; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... ' • 7.0 14. Silty limestones moderate brown; aphanitlc; thick irregular bedding (2* - 2f); weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... • 19.0 13. Concealed: regular slope • ...... 5.0 12. Bedded chert zones pale red; gnarly irregular bedding; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... 1.0 11. Silty limestones pale red purple; aphanitic; thin irregular bedding; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... 4.0 10. Conglomerates same as unit # 1 6 ...... 4.0 9. Silty limestone: same as unit # 8, but weathers fissile...... 25.0 8. Silty limestones light brownish gray; aphanitic; bedding massive (4* - 6*); base sharp; forms vertical cliff. • • . • • 38.0 7. Conglomerates same as unit #16.. • • • • • 0.5 6. Silty limestones same as unit # 8 • • • • • 6.0 5. Concealed; steep slope...... 41.0 Feet

Limestones medium light gray; coarsely crystalline; gnarly Irregular bedding; base sharp; weathers knobby; Des Moines Molluscoidan fauna of good preservation; random orientation; forms irregular ledge . • 2.0 Concealed* regular slope...... 17.0 Silty limestone: same as unit # 9 • • • • • • 0.5 Limestone breccias limestone and siItstone fragments (1" - 2B); angular to subround; in argillaceous limey matrix; bedding Irregular, gnarly; weathers knobby; forms irregular ledge (base concealed)• ...... 20.0

Total incomplete Haco limestone 208.0 77

TONTO CREEK SECTION 111°05*37" W — 34°20*25" N Measurod by R. L. Jackson Feet

Naco limestones -

32. Limestone breccia; limestone and siltstone fragments (1* - 2*); angular to s^round; in argillaceous limey matrix; bwiding irregular, gnarly; weathers knobby; forms ledge slope ...... • • • . 27.0

,Unconformity: Erosions!, relief of 15 to 25 feet.

Redwall limestones

31. Limestones light olive gray; medium crystalline to aphanitic; bedding massive; base sharp; contains Mollusooidan fauna of c - .. poor preservation; forms ledge-slope. • • . 40.0 30. Arenaceous limestones yellowish gray; aphanitic; inclusions of very fine-grained sand; base irregular (erosional uncon­ formity?); thin (2* - 2 1) flat Irregular bedding; forms irregular ledges and slopes. 8.0

; r Total Redwall limestone 48.0

Jerome formation: ...... : ,

29 • Sandstone: gray! ah orange; medium-grained; cement firm, highly calcareous; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers smooth, blocky; forms ledge-slope . . • ...... •; 30.0 28. Sandstones very li^at gray; medium-grained; cement weak, noh-calcareous; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded; forms rounded ledge , ...... 3.0 27. Arenaceous dolomitie limestones pale red; coarse- to medium- gr ai ned s and inclusi on s; calcite geoder inclusions ccmimon; weathers blocky; forms Irregular ledge ...... 6.0 26. Limestones light brownish gray; aphanitic; bedding massive; base gradational; weathers smooth rounded; forms rounded ledge;. • • • 8.0 25. Sandstones yellowish gray; very fine-grained; cement firm, calcareous; thin (2" -2!), flat irregular bedding; base gradational; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... 11.0 78

Feet

24. Sandstone $ pinkish gray; medium-grained; cement weak, highly calcareous; medium- scale cross-laminations; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded; forms ledge- slope ...... 11.0 23. Arenaceous dolomitic limestones medium light @ray; Inclusions of very fine-grained sand; bedding massive; base gradational; weathers smooth rounded and pitted; forms irregular cliff ...... 16.0 22. Arenaceous dolomitic limestone: pale yellowish brown; silt size inclusions; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded and pitted; forms vertical cliff ...... 11.0 21. Siltstone: grayish red; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers blocky; forms vertical cliff...... 8.0 20. Sandstone: light gray; very fine-grained; cement firm, non-caloareous; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers smooth - rounded; forms rounded cliff...... 6.0 19. Sandstone: grayish red; very fine-grained; cement firm, non-calcareous; bedding massive; base gradational; weathers blocky; forms • . ledge ...... 10.0 18. Arenaceous dolomitic limestone: same as . unit # 23 ...... 5.0 17. Sandstone: grayish red purple; very fire - grained; cement firm, non-calcareous;...... flat thin to thick (2H - 41) bedding; : . " weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge. . . 5.0 16. Siltstone: yellowish gray; bedding massive; inclusions of yellowish gray, medium light gray and moderate reddish brown siltstone common; base gradational; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... • ,5.0 15. Siltstone: medium light gray; cement: firm, non-calcareous; bedding massive; base grad­ ational; weathers smooth blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... 11.0 14. Sandstone: pale red; fine-grained; cement firm, non-calcareous; flat irregular thin (&* - 2") bedding; base gradational; weathers.smooth blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... 22.0 79

Feet

13. SiItstones light gray; cement firm, non­ calcar ecus; flat Irregular thin bedding; : base concealed; weathers smooth rounded; forms irregular ledge ...... 11.0 12. Concealed: irregular slope. • • • • • . . . 102.0 11. Arenaceous.dolomitic limestones pale red; silt size inclusions; bedding Irregular (2tt - 2*); calcite inclusions common; base gradational; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge ...... 22.0 10. Sandstone: pale red; cement firm, weakly calcareous; bedding thin (2n - 2*), small-scale "torrential type* cross- laminationa;-base gradational; weathers smooth rounded to pitted; forms irregular cliff ...... 37.0 9. Conglomerates Matrix: sandstone; pale red; fine to . medium-grained; cement firm, weakly calcareous; Gravel: chert and siItatone fragments; subround to subangular (^* - 1"); ? unit massive bedded; weather knobby; forms irregular ledge ...... 50.0

Total Jerome formation 390.0

Mazatzal group (Frecambrian): ,

8. Sandstone: pale red purple; medium-grained; •. : - : : 0 cement weak, non-calcareous; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded; forms rounded cliff ...... • 18.0 .-4 s 7., Si It s tones mottled light gray and pale red; cement firm, non-calcareous; flat irregular thin bedding; weathers blocky; forms ledge- slope ...... 18.0 6. Claystone: grayish orange pink; highly calcareous; thin irregular bedding; wedges out laterally, shows evidence of securing; weathers blocky; forms irregular ledge. • • 7.0 5. Dolomitic limestones medium light gray; aphanitic; thin flat bedding, thin shale or mudstone partings (&" - 2") between beds; weathers smooth blocky; forms irregular cliff ...... 8.0 219140 80

Feet

4, Dolomitic limestone; light gray; aphanitio; flat thin bedding; base sharp; weathers smooth blooky; forms irregular ledge. . , . 5.0 3. Sandstone; pale red; coarse- to medium- grained; cement firm, non-ealcareous; flat irregular thin - 2*) bedding; base sharp; quartz granule inclusions common; weathers knobby; forms irregular ledge-slope ...... 54.0 2. Conglomerate; Matrix; quartzite; pale brown; coarse- to medium-grained; bedding Irregular;

Gravel; highly altered rhyolite or granite fragments and quartz pebbles; grayish brown to light gray; subangular to sub- rounded - 2"); unit weathers knobby; forms irregular , slope . . > ...... 60.0

Total Mazatzal group 170.0

1. Base of section 100 yards below the confluence of Tonto and Horton creeks in the Frecambrian highly altered and decomposed granite or rhyolite.

Total section thickness 635.0 81

BABE HAF''”rn DA'T',TI lll°06*f Me astir# Feet

Coconino sandstones

Sandstone: very pale brown, very fine-grained. friable; shows compound cross-bedding on large scale; clear, even-grained quartz grains; weathers to light yellowish brown; forms massive cliff.

Supal-Cooonino contacts Concealed.

Supal formations Corduroy sand facies members 10. Concealeds steep timber studded slope . . • 483.0 9. SI It stones very light gray; cement firm, ; r highly calcareous; thin bedded; weathers blocky; forms irregular cliff 11.0

Total Corduroy sand facies member 494.0

Fort Apache limestone of stoyanows 8. Silty limestones light olive gray; aphanltic; bedding massive; calclte inclusions common; weathers blocky; forms vwtical cliff . . . 52.0 7. Silt stones grayish yellow; cement weak, non­ calcar eous; bedding massive; weathers smooth blocky; forms vertical cliff continuous with overlying and underlying units 4.0 6. Siltstone; yellowish gray; cement firm, highly calcareous; thin flat irregular bedding; weathers blocky; forms cliff . . • 6.0 5. Limestones medium dark gray; aphanltic; thin Irregular bedding; base sharp; weathers blocky; cliff forming with other units * ...... • • • • • . . •• • 0.5 4. Siltstone: pale olive; cement weak, non- calcar ecus; bedding massive; base sharp; weathers smooth rounded; forms rounded ledge . . . . • ...... 5.0

Total Fort Apache limestone of Stoyanow 67.5 Big "A- iand 5. Sane very fine-grained;

weathers smooth "cliff...... 15.0 .4" ' !: non. 540-° "• • : - • • weat^rriLot^oL^!;^ oo&o

Total incomplete Big "A" sand facies member 405*0 ... "

.%c. -.w-- ; ' - . Total section thickness 966.5 ":L k

■ % \ i';

.. v- ^

"■■e" ■t- ■ •:;v..y:: ■ ...

: T \ ' -

\ • •it- . > . :

. .: -/U-: - ' ' V ' ' . ' ' "T .;■ . ■':>;- y- ' / y c:. y y ; > 1 :a -,-v :. j '.\; . 'y

: / ■••**-■ V-'■* . : : k .

- ... ",: - . / ' . , ■ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ARIZONA WINSLOW 5 6 M i. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY" LONG VALLEY 2 M/. PINE QUADRANGLE. 170 000 FEET (EAST)] | ; 11 1 3 4 'go'1*3 0 ' i R*8 E * j630OCX) FEET (CENTRAL) j | <■X. X ' fy; ,73/0 E E W ..|i,, v ■7 .f^S9*5 .^968 h-JiU Sitruif/ , f e | of 1270000 FEET Tw en^yn i n e rm l e ^ v c |o C (EAST) n i ' y X V. votrvt'k '

* 3 0 ,

V- 4 v ; X ] /■• y;/ ./ L ' O N at / i it m 4 ■ m C Bajofr' i m ?: b=’>\ I (tWr'-i, (L, 6 , __

— ' : r / ^ 'J I r , V Z m y i I

> z A . ■ \\ J' 1 " l A 5' i c V, :,r I f * / , y 'A v! / \ X ..; > 1 ■ d m Z iiy c _(L# X 1 i 1 # x Z' % v : x ( J A 1 . '5oc- X ••*• "Zy ' •.. / . /* W 1 •*- n? X . ‘ 1 * 5599 ■■■e 32 ‘3' BM* 5604 <68 X > Ca?X°.a X 1 \ : X

JU K 7 X , V V f ( a K# T. 11^ N. l l 4 N . ScKi .zy.X 4 w X X &iJ/ / 6707 $;

H M La nVf 20' * = **X A# TV ''A/fO, V — PL Are x x/e. GEOLOGIC MAP OF M0G0LL0N RIM, PINE QUADRANGLE f

m S A 1 % ^ EXPLANATION X Sedimentary Rocks X"

E Coconino sandstone S ( Corduroy sand facies Strike and dip > Z\\ X u C-5 fa U ) Fort Apache limestone Z\ II N. PERMIAN P < Big "A" sand facies High angle fault (U, upthrown side, y'\ C< A / Oak Creek D, downthrown side) I l Sycamore Canyon ssc PENNSYLVANIAN Naco limestone Concealed fault 3 so to \ EP *v 1190000 FEET MISSISSIPPI AN | Redwall limestone Boundary of area (CENTRAL) mapped 3"x e e t ...... Igneous Rocks r

Tb I Tertiary basalt .Xc < ; > r 1155000 YARDS | R. 9 E. 20' / R. 10 E.i R .ll E. irawrrr^'5 ^-30"%?"! : P A Y S O N I % M l. M yconic projection. 1927 North American datum Topography by J.LLewis, FA.WuopiQ L.O.Newsome, Sc'ale 02500 • o o s r v e L T d a m * » M l . 5000yard grid based on U S.zone system,F J.G.Ransom,W.LThomas,and EJ.Matson •iMilew Surveyed in 1933-1934- 10000 foot grids based on Arizona (CentraU»'ui r o u t e s u s u a l l y t r a v c l f c * -Arizona (casrj rectangular coordinate systems MAPO IMPCPVIOUt SUm*Ar-rA r» Kiliimetein - ■ !?==== o t m i p B u m r A C t imppovcmbnts .

PPROXlMkTt MEAN Contour interval ftOj'eet DECLINATIOK «934 U. S . ROUTE PINE, ARIZ. H u n u n ( b ntPiu* A*‘ti 1 .•pi 0 © Edition of 1940

N 3415-W H115/15 THE TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS OF THE UNITED STATES

The United States Geological Survey is making a series of A survey of Puerto Hie is now in progress. The scale of ing spura separated by ravines. The spurs are truncated at standard topographic maps to cover the United States. This the published maps is their lower ends by a sea cliff. The hill at the left terminates work has been in progress since 1882, and the published maps The features shown on topographic maps may be arranged in abruptly at the valley in a steep scarp, from which it slopes cover more than 47 percent of the country, exclusive of outlying three groups— (1) water, including seas, lakes, rivers, canals, gradually away and forms an inclined tableland that is trav­ possessions. swamps, and other bodies of water; (2) relief, including ersed by a few shallow gullies. On the map each of these The maps are published on sheets that measure about 10 J by mountains, hills, valleys, aid other features of the land surface; features is represented, directly beneath its position in the 20 inches. Under the general plan adopted the country is (3) culture (works of man , such as towns, cities, roads, rail­ sketch, by contour lines. divided into quadrangles bounded by parallels of latitude and roads, and boundaries. Tlie symbols used to represent these The contour interval, or the vertical distance in feet between meridians of longitude. These quadrangles are mapped on features are shown and explained below. Variations appear on one contour and the next, is stated at the bottom of each map. different scales, the scale selected for each map being that which some earlier maps, and additional features are represented on This interval differs according to the topography of the area is best adapted to general use in the development of the country, some special maps. mapped: in a flat country it may be as small as 1 foot; in a and consequently, though the standard maps are of nearly uni­ All the water features are represented in blue, the smaller mountainous region it may be as great as 250 feet. In order form size, the areas that they represent are of different sizes. streams and canals by single blue lines and the larger streams that the contours may be read more easily certain contour lines, On the lower margin of each map are printed graphic scales by double lines. The huger streams, lakes, and the sea are every fourth or fifth, are made heavier than the others and are showing distances in feet, meters, miles, and kilometers. In accentuated by blue water lining or blue tint. Intermittent accompanied by figures showing altitude. The heights of many addition, the scale of the map is shown by a fraction expressing streams—those whose beds $re dry for a large part of the year— points—such as road intersections, summits, surfaces of lakes, a fixed ratio between linear measurements on the map and cor­ are shown by lines of blue dots and dashes. and benchmarks—are also given on the map in figures, which responding distances on the ground. For example, the scale Relief is shown by contour lines in brown, which on a few show altitudes to the nearest foot only. More precise figures 5^55 means that 1 unit on the map (such as 1 inch, 1 foot, or 1 maps are supplemented by -hading showing the effect of light for the altitudes of benchmarks are given in the Geological Sur­ meter) represents 62,500 of the same units on the earth’s surface. thrown from the northwest across the area represented, for the vey’s bulletins on spirit leveling. The geodetic coordinates of Although some areas are surveyed and some maps are com­ purpose of giving the appearance of relief and thus aiding in triangulation and transit-traverse stations are also published in piled and- published on special scales for special purposes, the the interpretation of the co ntour lines. A contour line repre­ bulletins. standard topographic surveys and the resulting maps have for sents an imaginary line on the ground (a contour) every part Lettering and the works of man are shown in black. Bound­ many years been of three types, differentiated as follows: of which is at the same altitude above sea level. Such a line aries, such as those of a State, county, city, land grant, town­ 1. Surveys of areas in which. there are problems o could be drawn at any altitude, but in practice only the con­ ship, or reservation, are shown by continuous or broken lines of public importance— relating, for example, to mineral develop­ tours at certain,Tfamlar Infervak uf .altitmle arc shown. The different kinds and weights. Public, roads suitable Tor motor ment, irrigation, or reclamation of swamp areas—are made with datum or zero of altitude of the Geological Survey maps is mean travel the greater part of the year are show n by solid double sufficient detail to be used in the publication of maps on a sea level. The 20-foot contour would be the shore line if the lines; poor public roads and private roads by dashed double scale of ^ (1 inch= one-half mile) or ^ (1 inch = 2,000 feet); sea should rise 20 feet above mean sea level.. Contour lines lines; trails by dashed single lines. Additional public road with a contour interval of 1 to UK) feet, according to the relief show the diape of the hills, mountains, and valleys, as well as classification if available is show n by red overprint. of the particular area mapped. their altitude. Successive •ontour lines, that are far apart on Each quadrangle is designated by the name of a city, town, 2. Surveys of areas in which there are problems of average the map indicate a gentle slops lines that are close together or prominent natural feature within it, and on the margins of public importance, such as most of the basin of the Mississippi indicate a steep slope, and lines that run together indicate a the map are printed the names of adjoining quadrangles of and its tributaries, are made with sufficient detail to be used in cliff. . . which maps have been published. More than 4,100 quad­ the publication of maps on a scale of (1 inch = nearly 1 The manner in which omtour .lines express altitude, form, rangles in the United States have been surveyed, and maps of mile), with a contour interval of 10 to 100 feet. and grade i- shown in the figure below. them similar to the one on the other side of this sheet have 3. Surveys of areas in which the problems are of minor been published. public importance, such as much of the mountain or desert Geologic maps of some of the areas shown on the topographic region of Arizona or New Mexico, and the high mountain area maps have , been published in the .form of folios. Each folio of the northwest, are made with sufficient detail to be used in includes maps showing the topography, geology,, underground the publication of maps on a scale of (1 inch = nearly 2 structure, and mineral deposits of the area, mapped, and several miles) or ^ 5 (1 inch = nearly 4 miles), with a contour interval pages of descriptive text. The text explains the maps and of 20 to 250 feet. describes the topographic and geologic features of the country The aerial camera is now being used in mapping. From the and its mineral products. Two hundred twenty-five folios have information recorded on the photographs, planimetric maps, been published. * . which show only drainage and culture, have been made for some Index maps of .each State and of Alaska and Hawaii showing areas in the United States. By the use of stereoscopic plotting the areas covered by topographic maps and geologic folios pub­ apparatus, aerial photographs are utilized also in the making of lished by the t * dogical Survey may be obtained the regular topographic maps, which show relief as well as free. Copies of tlie standard topographic maps may l>e obtained drainage and culture. for 10 cents each; some special maps are sold at different prices. A topographic survey of Alaska has been in progress since A discount of 40 percent is allowed on an order amounting to 1898, and nearly 44 percent of its area has now been mapped. $5 or more at the retail price. T he discount is allowed on an About 15 percent of the Territory has been covered by maps order for maps alone, either of one kind or in any assortment, on a scale of (1 inch = nearly 8 miles). For most of the or for maps together with geologic folios. The geologic folios remainder of the area surveyed the maps published are on a are sold for 25 cents or more each, the price depending on the scale of (1 inch = nearly 4 miles). For some areas of par­ size of tlie folio. A circular describing the folios will be sent ticular economic importance, covering about 4,300 square miles, on request the maps published are on a scale of (1 inch = nearly 1 mile) Applications for maps or folios should be accompanied by t. In addition to the area The sketch represents^ river valley that lies between two cash, draft, or money order (not postage stamps) and should be about 11,300 square miles of southeastern Alaska Has been hills. In Hie foreground U TTTg SeT$7Witll a 15ay" fnat is partly covered by planimetric maps on scales of 5^5 and 5 ^ . enclosed by a hooked sajnf bar. On each side of the valley is THE DIRECTOR, The Hawaiian Islands have been surveyed, and the resulting a terrace into which smal streams have cut narrow gullies. United States Geological Survey, maps are published on a scale of The hill on the right has n rounded summit and gently slop­ November 1937. Washington, D. C. STANDARD SYMBOLS

CULTURE (p vnted iti black)

n

Boundary Bench mark Cemeteries Church, School Coke oveuR Fauks and. w a r Mine or Prospect Shaft Mine tunnel Mine tunnel Lighthouse murmi merit f»uf>plenu*ntary Ae/tM / datUnffuithfi an oil reservoirs gas w4lls quarry (•hawing Jinn tian J a P D e a c m i m ark »ftown l(y orr>»» ansi 7 •Jesuit riutpsj blaeJo Htfuifti tvitfvout Irttrfingj RELIEF WATER t printed in brown) (printed in blue)

r X 5 * 6 3 if L a k e or U n surveyed Elevation above Contour* Depression Levee Su'eaiul {alls and Intermittent Canals or Aqueducts or Aqueduct. "rapids ■ streams and. ditches waterpipes tunnels p o n d stream and m e a n sea. level iCantuur*_____ afunrins/ contours dnf>th of^-atrr ■ ditches abandoned canal f on- neowZ natp*i in blnn)

£ v- ■ M S u b m e r g e d Cliffs „ Mane d u m p s T;filings or S a n d and Intermittent Glacier Spring WeB Marsh W a s h lake f O r - .Viomzi c o n t o u r s fOf' by ) mining debris sand pcintad cn hint)

rorooD"WOODS (when printed in green)