DOCSLIB.ORG

Applegate Subbasin Total Maximum Daily Load (Tmdl) Huc # 17100309

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Applegate Subbasin Total Maximum Daily Load (Tmdl) Huc # 17100309 APPLEGATE SUBBASIN TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOAD (TMDL) HUC # 17100309 Applegate River Mile 8 Applegate River Mile 39 Little Applegate River Near Mouth Beaver Creek Mile 3 December 2003 Prepared by Oregon Department of Environmental Quality For more information, contact: Bill Meyers Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 201 W. Main Street, #2-D Medford, OR 97501 Applegate Subbasin TMDL December 2003 Statement of Purpose This Total Daily Maximum Load (TMDL) document has been prepared to meet the requirements of Section 303(d) of the 1972 Federal Clean Water Act. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................................................1 WATER QUALITY SUMMARY .....................................................................................................................................1 Introduction..........................................................................................................................................................1 Scope....................................................................................................................................................................1 Legal Requirements..............................................................................................................................................1 Listed Parameters ................................................................................................................................................1 TMDL SUMMARIES...................................................................................................................................................1 TMDL Load Capacity and Allocations:...............................................................................................................1 Temperature TMDL:............................................................................................................................................2 Sedimentation: .....................................................................................................................................................3 Biological Criteria:..............................................................................................................................................4 Flow Modification: ..............................................................................................................................................4 Habitat Modification: ..........................................................................................................................................4 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN.....................................................................................................................4 SECTION 1. APPLEGATE SUBBASIN TMDL BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION.............................1 OREGON’S TMDL PROGRAM (GENERALLY DEFINED) ..............................................................................................1 DOCUMENT ORGANIZATION ......................................................................................................................................1 WATERSHED CHARACTERIZATION ............................................................................................................................2 Geographic Setting ..............................................................................................................................................2 Ownership............................................................................................................................................................3 Geology................................................................................................................................................................3 Climate and Weather ...........................................................................................................................................4 Hydrology ............................................................................................................................................................4 Applegate Dam.....................................................................................................................................................5 Fisheries...............................................................................................................................................................5 Coho Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch).............................................................................................................................. 6 Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha)................................................................................................................. 6 Steehhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss).................................................................................................................................... 6 Resident Trout (Oncorhynchus species)............................................................................................................................ 6 WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENTS................................................................................................................................7 WATER QUALITY IMPAIRMENTS – CALIFORNIA LANDS..............................................................................................9 APPLICABLE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS..............................................................................................................9 Beneficial Uses: ...................................................................................................................................................9 Temperature Standard: OAR 340-041-0365(2)(b)(A)........................................................................................10 Sedimentation Standard: OAR 340-041-0365(2)(j), (OAR 340-41-027), OAR 340-41-0365(2)(c) ...................11 Biological Criteria Standard: OAR 340-41-027................................................................................................11 Flow Modification Standard: OAR 340-041-0365 (2)(I), OAR 340-41-362......................................................11 Habitat Modification Standard: OAR 340-041-0365 (2)(I), OAR 340-41-362..................................................12 SECTION 2. TEMPERATURE TMDL .................................................................................................................13 INTRODUCTION:.......................................................................................................................................................15 SUBWATERSHED DESCRIPTION AND OWNERSHIP ....................................................................................................15 BENEFICIAL USES SENSITIVE TO TEMPERATURE. ....................................................................................................15 DEVIATION FROM WATER QUALITY STANDARDS; 303(D) LISTINGS........................................................................15 SALMONID STREAM TEMPERATURE REQUIREMENTS...............................................................................................17 TEMPERATURE TARGET IDENTIFICATION: CWA 303(D) (1) ....................................................................................18 CRITICAL PERIOD - SEASONAL VARIATION – CWA §303(D)(1) ..............................................................................20 EXISTING POLLUTION SOURCES – CWA §303(D)(1) ...............................................................................................20 Point Sources:....................................................................................................................................................20 Oregon Department of Environmental Quality i Applegate Subbasin TMDL December 2003 Nonpoint Sources:..............................................................................................................................................21 1. Near-stream vegetation disturbance/removal ............................................................................................................. 21 System Potential Vegetation............................................................................................................................................ 24 2. Channel modifications and widening.......................................................................................................................... 25 3. Hydromodification-Water Withdrawals ...................................................................................................................... 26 4. Natural Sources .......................................................................................................................................................... 27 Applegate Dam...................................................................................................................................................27 Flows .............................................................................................................................................................................. 27 Temperature.................................................................................................................................................................... 28 TMDL - LOADING CAPACITIES AND ALLOCATIONS ................................................................................................30
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Little Applegate Hydrology Report
    Little Applegate Watershed Hydrology Report Michael Zan * Hydrologist April 1995 Little Applegate Watershed Analysis Hydrology Report SECTION 1 LITTLE APPLEGATE RIVER HYDROLOGY Mean Monthly Flows: Except for some data collected from May through October 1913, and from June through October 1994. there is no known flow data for the Little Applegate River or its tributaries. With this in mind it was necessary to construct a hydrograph displaying mean monthly flows by utilizing records from nearby stations that have been published in USGS Surface Water Records and Open-File Reports. In constructing a hydrograph, a short discussion of low flows is first in order. Since low streamflows have been identified as a key question pertaining to the larger issues of water quantity/quality and fish populations, the greatest need is to gain a reasonable estimate of seasonal low flows to help quantify the impacts of water withdrawals on instream beneficial uses. With this in mind, extreme caution must be used when extrapolating data from gaged to ungaged watersheds. This is particularly important in determining low-flow characteristics (Riggs 1972, Gallino 1994 personal communications). The principle terrestrial influence on low flow is geology and the primary meteorological influence is precipitation. Neither have been adequately used to describe effects on low flow using an index so that estimation of low flow characteristics of sites without discharge measurements has met with limited success. Exceptions are on streams in a region with homogeneous geology, topography, and climate, in which it should be possible to define a range of flow per square mile for a given recurrence interval.
    [Show full text]
  • Applegate River Basin
    122o15' 124o15' 43o00' DOUGLAS RIVER UE West ROG Branch Elk Cr COOS DOUGLAS Prospect 14330000 KLAMATH RIVER 14332000 14338000 Cascade Gorge South Fork Trail McLeod 14335040 14372300 14337500 Agness 14337600 Big ROGUE Evans Creek14339000 Butte JOSEPHINE Rogue Grants Pass River 14359000 Creek Gold Beach Illinois Wilderville 14361500 Gold Central 14369500 Hill Point N CURRY JACKSON A Applegate R River River 14357500 E Medford C Bear O Applegate 14377100 Ruch C I 14354200 F Chetco Kerby I 14366000 C Ashland Creek A P 14362250 14353500 14400000 Star Gulch 14353000 Brookings 14362000 42o00' 14361900 Copper 0102 03 0 40 MILE S 0102 03 0 40 KILO ME TE RS EXPLANATIO N 14371500 Stream-gaging station OREGON 14339000 Stream-gaging station and water-quality data collection site Figure 33. Location of surface-water and water-quality stations in the Rogue and Chetco River Basins. 832 See Figure 34. Lost Creek South Fork See Figure 34. Reservoir RM Rogue River 167.3 Completed 1977 14335040 RM 157.2 14337500 RM RM 0.64 Big Butte Creek 155.3 14337600 14338000 RM 154.0 RM 1.2 Elk RM Creek RM 151.9 3.3 14339000 RM 138.6 RM RM Bear Creek 21.1 126.8 14357500 14354200 RM 10.1 RM 21.0 14359000 Creek Ashland RM RM 125.8 4.9 Reeder West Branch Elk Creek Elk Creek Branch West Reservoir East Fork RM Ashland 5.3 Creek 14353500 14353000 RM 0.3 RM 5.6 Creek Creek EXPLANATION Ashland West Fork Fork West 14357500 Stream-gaging 14361500 RM 101.8 14361900 station RM 46.3 RM 14369500 Stream-gaging Applegate RM APPLEGATE 37.5 RIVER station and 94.8 14369500 14366000 14362000 Lake water-quality RM 7.6 RM 26.7 RM 45.7 data collection 14362250 site RM 1.1 RM 1.2 River mile Stream—Arrow shows direction ROGUE RIVER ROGUE of flow Star Gulch 14372300 RM 29.7 14400000 RM 10.7 RM ILLINOIS RIVER 27.1 14377100 RM 50.3 CHETCO RIVER P A C I F I C O C E A N Figure 35.
    [Show full text]
  • 50 Places to Go Fishing Within 60 Minutes of Medford
    41. ROGUE RIVER ABOVE LOST CREEK 48. VALLEY OF THE ROGUE STATE PARK, Common Fish RESERVOIR, Prospect – 42 mi, 55 min. Gold Hill – 16 mi., 20 min. Trout Salmon, steelhead, trout 50 places Premier summer trout fishery stocked with rainbow trout weekly Campground with river access, boat ramp and ADA restroom. between Memorial Day and Labor Day. Campgrounds and Take I-5 N for 15.5 miles to Exit 45B. Right onto Twin Bridges to go fishing within other public access sites are stocked. More fishing on naturally Rd. Go under the freeway into the park. ORSP produced trout is available in tributaries, and on the South and 49. WHITEHORSE PARK, Grants Pass – Salmon Middle Forks. Take OR-62 E about 42 miles and look for access Trout Steelhead 60 minutes points and campgrounds. USFS 38 mi., 45 min. Salmon, steelhead, trout 42. SARDINE CREEK/ROCK POINT, Gold Hill – of Medford County campground and day use fee park with restrooms, picnic 13 mi., 18 min. Let’s go fishing on Saturday. Not enough time to go fishing? Think again – if you live in the Salmon, steelhead, trout area, and boat ramp. Take I-5 N 28 miles to Exit 58. Left onto 6th Str. and go about 2 miles. Right onto G Str. and go 1.3 miles Medford area, there are many places you can get to in less than an hour. Mileage and generalized Undeveloped access site on the Rogue River at the junction of where it becomes Upper River Rd. Go another 4.5 miles to where directions are from Rogue Valley Mall, 1968 Crater Lake Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley by Gregory V
    Weather and Climate of the Rogue Valley By Gregory V. Jones, Ph.D., Southern Oregon University The Rogue Valley region is one of many intermountain valley areas along the west coast of the United States. Nestled in the southwestern portion of Oregon, the landscape of the Rogue Valley is extremely diverse, coming from the joining of three mountain ranges of varying ages and structure: the Klamath and Siskiyou Mountains to the southwest to southeast, the Coastal Range to the west, and the Cascades to the east and north. The region is drained mainly by the Rogue River and its major tributaries; the Applegate River, the Illinois River, and Bear Creek. At the largest scale, the weather and climate of the region is mainly influenced by the North Pacific Ocean and the westerly winds of the mid-latitudes. The maritime air masses that originate over the Pacific are cooled by the ocean currents offshore and moderate the climate of the region. Seasonally the west coast undergoes shifts between cooler, moister conditions in the winter with a strengthening of the Aleutian Low that brings storms into the region; to warmer, drier conditions in the summer that are associated with the dominance of the Pacific High. On a regional scale, the general north-south or northwest-southeast oriented valleys, with their proximity to the Pacific Ocean and the number and height of mountain barriers, help to create climate conditions of wetter and cooler areas in the western parts of the region and warmer and drier eastern areas. At the local scale, site differences in elevation, topography, and orientation to the sun influence the variation in gardening potential.
    [Show full text]
  • A Giant Among Men Lost to the Applegate Valley 25 Years Of
    Applegater Summer 2019 1 Photo by Lisa E. Baldwin applegater.org Celebrating SUMMER 2019 Applegate Valley Community Newsmagazine Volume 12, No. 2 Serving Jackson and Josephine Counties — Circulation: 13,000 ~25~Years A giant among Long-time Applegate Valley Fire District officer to retire men lost to the BY SANDY SHAFFER Applegate Valley On April 8, 2019, with the death of Christopher Bratt, the Applegater board lost its longest-standing board member, the Applegater one of its staunchest supporters, and the Applegate one of its most outstanding citizens. Chris worked tirelessly, for decades, on behalf of environmental concerns in the Applegate. In his column in the Applegater, “Behind the Green Door,” he kept readers abreast of actions by the Bureau of Land Management and the US Forest Service, never reluctant to state his own opinion, which was always “green.” He ended every column with some version of asking for the reader’s response, which he genuinely wanted. He never shied from a good strong political argument, but he let Brad Barnes (center) accepting 30-year award in 2017, with politics be politics and friendships be friendships. Captain Mike Kuntz (left) and Captain Greg Gilbert (right). Chris had used a pacemaker for a number of years. Photo: Applegate Valley Fire District. He died peacefully at home with loving family members 19. We dedicate this issue of the Applegater at his side. He was 88 years old. to Chris. His memory will live on in Brad Barnes, the Applegate Valley Fire District’s (AVFD’s) longest- An obituary, along with heartfelt tributes to Chris our hearts.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic, Wildlife, and Special Plant Habitat
    I 53.2: 53A2s U.S. Department of the Interior June 1995 AQ 3/c 4 Bureau of Land Management Medford District Office 3040 Biddle 9oad Medford, Oregon 97504 I U.S. Department of Agriculture U.S. Forest Service Rogue River National Forest P.O. Box 520 _________ 333 West 8th Street Sft>TRV&> Medford, Oregon 97501 iu~s• Siskiyou National Forest ~~' ~~P.O. Box 440 Rd 200 N.E. Greenfield Rd. Grants Pass, Oregon 97526 Applegate River Watershed Assessment Aquatic, Wildlife, and Special Plant Habitat 41- As the Nation's principal conservation agency, the Department of the Interior has responsibility for most of our nationally owned public lands and natural resources. This includes fostering the wisest use of our land and water resources, protecting our fish and wildlife, preserving the environmental and cultural values of our national parks and historical places, and providing for the enjoyment of life through outdoor recreation. The Department assesses our energy and mineral resources and works to assure that their development is in the best interest of all our people. The Department also has a major responsibility for American Indian reservation communities and for people who live in Island Territories under U.S. administration. BLWOR/WAIPL-95/031+1792 Applegate River Watershed Assessment: Aquatic, Wildlife, and Special Plant Habitat Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................... i TABLE OF FIGURES .............................................................. ii TABLE OF TABLES .............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Singing out in the Spring
    14 Spring 2020 Applegater A LOOK BACK Voices of the Applegate Bigfoot trap has captured bears Singing out in the spring and curiosity, but not Sasquatch By the time this article reaches you, the Voices of the Applegate choir will be well BY PAUL FATTIG into its preparation for the spring concerts. These will be held on April 3 at 7 pm at the Historic Presbyterian Church, 6th and California Streets, Jacksonville, and on John McKelligott couldn’t help but a dilapidated shelter once inhabited by April 5 at 3 pm at the Applegate River Lodge, 15100 Highway 238, Applegate. The wonder what the heck he had gotten a trap watchman. The trap is about 200 theme for the concerts is “And the Night Shall Be Filled with Music,” and, as you into when his job took him to a feet farther. may suspect, every song will reflect the joy of singing and how music shapes our lives. strange contraption a half mile west of While there is no sign boldly Voices of the Applegate is sharing its second year with director Shayne Flock, Applegate Lake. announcing “Bigfoot trap,” there are who has brought new ideas and more advanced programs to our choir. We are “I was like, ‘Huh, so this is what the two clues on the trail signs: a humanoid a community choir made up of singers from Applegate, Williams, Ruch, and forest service is like,’” he recalled. footprint and a reclining hairy fellow. Jacksonville, and we are celebrating our 18th year together. We are constantly Back in 1987, the sight of the “I routed a sign for it in the old days,” learning more about working together and producing the best music possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Americans of the Rogue Valley
    An introduction to: Native Americans of the Rogue Valley Presented by: North Mountain Park Nature Center A division of the Ashland Parks and Recreation Department Version 4: May 2010 A Note on Authenticity This booklet is one piece of the North Mountain Park Nature Center’s interpretation relating to the role of Native Americans of the Rogue Valley on both an historic and ecological level. Although based on numerous ethnographies, historical accounts, archaeological records, and the opinions and statements of tribal people of today, this booklet is not meant to be a scholarly document. The purpose of this booklet is to form a general picture of what life was like for the Native Americans who lived in and around Ashland prior to contact with Euro-Americans, and their role as stewards of this land. In attempting this interpretation, certain challenges arose as to which tribes actually lived where, how they lived and what they believed. Most of this difficulty is related to the fact that the tribes of the Rogue Valley — the Shasta, Takelma and Athabaskans had a very short contact period with white settlers before being forcibly removed to reservations in northwest Oregon. Unfortunately, the few ethnographies that were conducted, which provide some of the best written accounts of how people lived, occurred long after the people were removed from their homeland and forced to relinquish their traditional way of life. It is hoped that this booklet will be a starting place for an ongoing dialogue between Native Americans and anyone interested in exploring how people can learn from the past while looking toward a better, more sustainable and more honorable future for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rogue River Basin, Southwestern Oregon
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Rogue River Basin, Southwestern Oregon Open-File Report 2011–1280 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Gravel bars and bedrock outcrop on the Rogue River at its confluence with Lobster Creek. (Photograph by Krista L. Jones, U.S. Geological Survey, July 2010.) Preliminary Assessment of Channel Stability and Bed-Material Transport in the Rogue River Basin, Southwestern Oregon By Krista L. Jones, Jim E. O’Connor, Mackenzie K. Keith, Joseph F. Mangano, and J. Rose Wallick Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the Oregon Department of State Lands Open-File Report 2011–1280 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov. Suggested citation: Jones, K.L., O’Connor, J.E., Keith, M.K., Mangano, J.F., and Wallick, J.R., 2012, Preliminary assessment of channel stability and bed-material transport in the Rogue River basin, southwestern Oregon: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Grants Pass Murphy Williams Provolt Applegate Ruch Phoenix
    Other Area Attractions & Services: Monarch Ladybug Red Admiral Murphy: • Gas Station, Groceries & ATM To Roseburg • Restaurants & Eugene • Pennington Farm (Berries, Jams & Pies) Reminiscent of the Mediterranean hillsides where lavender originates, Williams: Grants Pass • Williams Country Store the Applegate Valley enjoys bright (Gas, Groceries & ATM) mid-day summer sun, soothing • Williams General Store Central Point Bumble Bee afternoon breezes and a unique (Gas, Groceries & ATM) • Restaurants, Winery river valley terroir, making it a Rossanley d a • Hiking at Pacifica & Grayback Mountain Honey Bee o Drive R perfect place for growing and e Hanley Road p o showcasing all the wonderful H Provolt: o li R ad w b OSU Lavender Garden e u beauty that is lavender. Medford • Provolt Store (Groceries & ATM) K N 569 Hanley Road • Whistling Duck (Organic Produce) Slagle Creek Central Point, OR 97502 Murphy Road West Main • Applegate Nursery ad pplegate Roa o North A d R Jacksonville y So r uth Applegate & North Applegate: e S h ta c g t e • Applegate Store (Gas, Groceries & ATM) a R H oad h • Peace of Pizza Fis So u thside Road Phoenix • Lodging & Dining at Applegate River Lodge William • Restaurants & Wineries s Hi ghw Ap Applegate To Coast ay plegate River • Bed & Breakfast & Oregon Spring Azure Provolt Caves d Ruch: a o • Ruch Country Store (Groceries & ATM) R p ad a o G R • Ruch Cafe k y H r e a a e Po re well C w m t • Cantrall Buckley Park h Sara Orangetip a i l g t i Ruch d o W H a n • Paragliding o s R R k o • Restaurants & Wineries m e
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Act Living with Fire in the Applegate
    Balancing Act Living with Fire in the Applegate Applegate Communities’ Collaborative Fire Protection Strategy Coordinated by the Applegate Partnership Sandy Shaffer and Jack Shipley, Project Coordinators Diana Coogle, Editor Applegate, Oregon August 2002 About the Applegate Communities' Collaborative Fire Protection Strategy a.k.a. THE APPLEGATE FIRE PLAN The Applegate Fire Plan is a collaborative effort, hatched from an idea that was developed jointly by local citizens and federal agency folks in the Spring of 2001. Due to wide-spread participation throughout the Applegate Valley, general project coordination was organized by the Applegate Partnership, a non-profit community- based group founded in 1992. Initial funding for this project was awarded via the National Fire Plan to the Applegate Partnership in October, 2001. This written plan is the result. The Mission of the Applegate Partnership The Applegate Partnership is a community-based, non- profit organization involving industry, conservation groups, natural resource agencies, and residents cooperating to encourage and facilitate the use of natural resource princi- ples that promote ecosystem health and diversity. Through community involvement and education, this partnership supports management of all land within the watershed in a manner that sustains natural resources and that will, in turn, contribute to economic and community well-being and resilience. The logo for the Applegate Fire Plan was designed by Greeley Wells. Applegate Fire Plan - 3 List of Partners The following local,
    [Show full text]
  • Snake Surveys in Jackson, Josephine and Southern Douglas Counties, Oregon
    Snake Surveys in Jackson, Josephine and Southern Douglas Counties, Oregon JASON REILLY ED MEYERS DAVE CLAYTON RICHARD S. NAUMAN May 5, 2011 For more information contact: Jason Reilly Medford District Bureau of Land Management [email protected] Introduction Southwestern Oregon is recognized for its high levels of biological diversity and endemism (Whittaker 1961, Kaye et al. 1997). The warm climate and broad diversity of habitat types found in Jackson and Josephine counties result in the highest snake diversity across all of Oregon. Of the 15 snake species native to Oregon, 13 occur in the southwestern portion of the state and one species, the night snake, is potentially found here. Three of the species that occur in Oregon: the common kingsnake, the California mountain kingsnake, and the Pacific Coast aquatic garter snake are only found in southwestern Oregon (Table 1, St. John 2002). Table 1. Snakes known from or potentially found in Southwestern Oregon and conservation status. Scientific Name Common Name Special Status Category1 Notes Charina bottae Rubber Boa None Common Sharp-tailed See Feldman and Contia tenuis None Snake Hoyer 2010 Recently described Forest Sharp-tailed Contia longicaudae None species see Feldman Snake and Hoyer 2010 Diadophis Ring-necked Snake None punctatus Coluber constrictor Racer None Masticophis Appears to be very Stripped Whipsnake None taeniatus rare in SW Oregon Pituophis catenifer Gopher Snake None Heritage Rank G5/S3 Lampropeltis Federal SOC Appears to be rare in Common Kingsnake getula ODFW SV SW Oregon ORBIC 4 Heritage Rank G4G5/S3S4 Lampropeltis California Mountain Federal SOC zonata Kingsnake ODFW SV ORBIC 4 Thamnophis sirtalis Common Garter Snake None Thamnophis Northwestern Garter None ordinoides Snake Thamnophis Western Terrestrial None elegans Garter Snake Thamnophis Pacific Coast Aquatic None atratus Garter Snake No records from SW Hypsiglena Oregon.
    [Show full text]