13/01925/FUL Installation of a Single Wind Turbine with a Maximum Tip

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

13/01925/FUL Installation of a Single Wind Turbine with a Maximum Tip APP 02 Application Number: 13/01925/FUL Minor Installation of a single wind turbine with a maximum tip height of 67 metres (hub height of 40 metres and rotor diameter of 54 metres) AT Malt Mill Farm, Castlethorpe Road, Hanslope FOR Rex Park Ltd Target: 4th November 2013 Ward: Newport Pagnell North & Hanslope Parish: Hanslope Parish Council Report Author/Case Officer: Jeremy Lee Contact Details: 01908 252316 [email protected] Team Leader: Nicola Wheatcroft Team Leader Strategic Applications Team Contact Details: 01908 252274 [email protected] 1.0 INTRODUCTION (A brief explanation of what the application is about) 1.1 The Site The application site is 530m north-west of Malt Mill Farm Equestrian Centre in pasture land located near the top of the eastern slope of the broad Tove Valley that stretches between Hanslope and Yardley Gobion. Both the Grand Union Canal and the West Coast Main Line Railway pass through the valley and a number of footpaths and bridleways criss-cross it. Views along this stretch of the valley are currently dominated by Hanslope Parish Church, St James the Great, which acts as a landmark and focal point across and along the valley. Details of the location of the site and its relationship to surrounding properties can be seen in the plans attached to this report. 1.2 The Proposal The proposed turbine would be located on concrete foundations and vehicular access would be achieved via a new access road accessed from an existing track running from Malt Mill Farm. The application as originally submitted showed a turbine with a tip height of 86m, but it has been amended to show a turbine with a tip height of 67m. Details of the proposal as described above can be seen in the plans appended to this report. 2.0 RELEVANT POLICIES (The most important policy considerations relating to this application) 2.1 National Policy National Planning Policy Framework paragraphs: 14 – Presumption in favour of sustainable development 17 – Core Planning Principles 28 – Supporting a prosperous rural economy 93-95 – Renewable energy 97-98 – Renewable energy 109 – Conserving and enhancing the environment 112 – Best and most versatile agricultural land 118 – Biodiversity enhancement 128- 129, 131-134– Historic environment Planning Practice Guidance – Renewable and low carbon energy (April 2014) 2.2 Local Policy Core Strategy CSA – NPPF – Presumption in favour of sustainable development CS9 – Strategy for the Rural Area CS14 – Large Scale Renewable Energy Schemes CS19 – The Historic and Natural Environment Adopted Milton Keynes Local Plan 2001-2011 S10 – Open Countryside D1- Impact of Development on Locality D5 – Renewable Energy HE1 – Protection of Archaeological Sites HE5 – Development Affecting the Setting of a Listed Building NE1 – Nature Conservation Sites NE2 – Protected Species NE4 – Conserving and Enhancing Landscape Character T10 – Traffic 3.0 MAIN ISSUES (The issues which have the greatest bearing on the decision) 3.1 The main issue is the impact of the proposal upon the setting of the Listed, St James the Great, Hanslope Parish Church and other heritage assets and upon the character and appearance of the area in general. It is considered that the proposed turbine would dominate views of Hanslope and in particular of St James the Great from the west and south-west which would significantly detract from the setting of the Church and the appearance of the valley in general. It is considered that the impact would be so significant as to outweigh any economic and ecological benefits that would derive from the renewable energy that would be generated by the development. 4.0 RECOMMENDATION (The decision that officers recommend to the Committee) 4.1 It is recommended that planning permission be refused for the reasons set out at the end of this report. 5.0 CONSIDERATIONS (An explanation of the main issues that have lead to the officer Recommendation) 5.1 Impact Upon Heritage Assets The Church of St James the Great at Hanslope sits on the ridge above the Tove Valley and is by far the most prominent feature in views of the ridge from the west and south-west acting as a landmark that defines Hanslope. Whilst the proposed turbine would be a little over a kilometre from St James the Great, its height and prominent location would ensure that it would be a feature that would rival the Church for visual dominance and diminish the contribution the Church makes to the landscape and sense of place. It is considered that by diminishing the value of St James the Great as a landmark and visual reference point the proposal would diminish the Church’s value as a Heritage asset. 5.2 The proposed turbine would also impact on other heritage assets in the area, including the Conservation Areas at Hanslope and Castlethorpe and the Church of Saint Simon and Saint Jude at Castlethorpe. However, it is considered that the impact on St James the Great is of the greatest concern. The harm that has been identified should be given significant weight when weighing up the planning balance applicable to the application. This has been underlined by the recent High Court and Court of Appeal decisions which quashed a Planning Inspector’s decision to allow a wind turbine development at Barnwell Manor in Northamptonshire. 5.3 Impact Upon the Appearance of the Area The landscape to the west of Hanslope is dominated by the ridge on which the village sits. In some views from the west and south west, this ridge is seen with the existing wind turbines at Roade in Northamptonshire and further off the turbines at Petsoe End Emberton in the background. The turbines at Roade in particular intrude into views of the ridge and the Tove Valley below. 5.4 The proposal, by introducing a turbine into the foreground of these views would increase the sense that the village of Hanslope and the Tove valley in general are dominated by wind turbines. It is considered that this would have a detrimental impact upon the appearance of the area particularly in views from the many footpaths and bridleways which cross the western slopes of the Tove Valley 5.5 Impact Upon Residential Amenities The closest residential property (Badger’s Balney) to the proposed turbine would be around 500m to the north. The clearest views of the turbine from residential properties would be from parts of Williams Close and Western Drive where many houses back onto the fields leading to the turbine site, but the closest of these would be over 700m to the north-east of the turbine. The proposal would clearly have a significant impact upon views from these residential properties. However, in view of the distances involved it is considered that the impact would not be so significant as to warrant refusal on that basis. 5.6 Concerns have been raised by objectors about the potential impact of noise and shadow flicker from the turbine. The applicants have submitted data in support of their application which demonstrates that the development would not have an unacceptable impact upon the amenities of residential properties in the vicinity. 5.7 Shadow flicker can occur where the sun is viewed directly through the blades of a turbine. In Britain this effect can only occur (because of the height and movement of the sun) between 130 degrees north-west and 130 degrees north-east of the turbine and it has been showed that the effect is only experienced at a distance of 10 times the diameter of the turbine blades, which in this case would give a distance of 510m. The impact of the shadow flicker would decrease the further the property would be from the turbine. 5.8 In this instance the only residential property that could be said to be potentially impacted by shadow flicker would be Badger’s Balney. However, at 500m from the turbine it would be close to the limit of any potential shadow flicker effect. It is considered that given the distance of Badger’s Balney from the turbine and the trees and hedges between the house and the turbine, any shadow flicker that would occur would not have a significant impact upon the resident’s amenities. 5.9 Conclusions Renewable energy has an important role to play in the economic and environmental well-being of the country. However, this significant benefit must be balanced against the impact renewable energy schemes have upon the appearance of an area and in particular upon the setting of heritage assets. In this case it is considered that the impact upon the setting of St James the Great Church and the Tove Valley in general would outweigh the benefits the turbine would generate. It is therefore recommended that planning permission be refused for the reasons set out below. 6.0 REASONS (The reasons that officers recommend that the application should be refused. The reasons must be ones that the Council can demonstrate with evidence, should the applicant appeal against the refusal.) 1. The proposed 67m high three bladed rotating wind turbine would introduce a conspicuous visual intrusion into the open rural context of St James the Great and other heritage assets in the locality to their detriment contrary to the provisions of Policies HE5 and HE6 of the Adopted Milton Keynes Local Plan, Policy CS19 of the Adopted Milton Keynes Core Strategy and paragraphs 132- 134 of the National planning Policy Framework. 2. The proposed development would be located in a prominent location on the western edge of Hanslope and on the slope that dominates the attractive valley between Hanslope and Yardley Gobion. The proposal would introduce a feature that would dominate the valley and the setting of Hanslope village to the detriment of the appearance of the area contrary to policies D1 and D5 of the Adopted Milton Keynes Local Plan.
Recommended publications
  • Hanslope, Milton Keynes, MK19 7HL Mawley Hanslope Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK19 7HL
    Hanslope, Milton Keynes, MK19 7HL Mawley Hanslope Milton Keynes Buckinghamshire MK19 7HL £1,250,000 Mawley is an attractive 6 bedroom detached period property sitting in over 3 acres off a public bridleway with an opportunity to further extend into stunning contemporary living accommodation, and conversion of separate barn into annex and stables, subject to pending planning permission. The property is surrounded by countryside & farmland, - ideal for those looking for a manageable equestrian property. The house, formally two properties converted into one large home, has been extensively yet sympathetically modernised in recent times but still offers scope for further improvements to the rear wing and potential for a combination of conversions and extension to both the house and barn - see our later note. Mawley has well presented accommodation, abundant with character features to include fireplaces exposed beams, stone & brickwork and slate floors. It comprises four reception rooms, two kitchens, six bedrooms and three bath/shower rooms. Plans have been drawn to transform the rear wing, converting the attached barn and adding a heavily glazed extension along with conversion of the separate barn in to an annexe. The property occupies a plot of around 3 acres to include paddocks of around 2.5 acres with its rural setting and adjacent network of bridleways, paths and narrow lanes makes for a prefect home for those wishing to keep horses at home. This is a fabulous property in a stunning setting which must be seen to be appreciated. • EQUESTRIAN PROPERTY • RURAL LOCATION • AROUND 3 ARCES • DETACHED FARM HOUSE • ABUNDANT CHARACTER FEATURES • 4 RECEPTION ROOMS • 6 BEDROOMS • 3 BATH/ SHOWER ROOMS • BARN & YARD • SCOPE TO EXTEND & CONVERT Ground Floor established flower and shrub beds and mature trees.
    [Show full text]
  • Index Class: Minor Applications Min 01 09/00637
    INDEX CLASS: MINOR APPLICATIONS No. Reference Address Ward Parish Report Plan(s) Page Page MIN 01 09/00637/FUL 111 Buckingham Bletchley & West 14 28 Road Fenny Bletchley Bletchley Stratford Town Council MIN 02 09/01873/FUL Five Acres Bletchley & Simpson 34 44 Nursing Home Fenny Parish Simpson Stratford Council MIN 03 09/01923/FUL 8 Marshworth Woughton Woughton 52 63 Tinkers Bridge Community Council MIN 04 09/02119/FUL Milton Keynes Woughton Woughton 67 73 General Hospital Community Standing Way Council Eaglestone MIN 05 09/02264/FUL Church View Sherington Moulsoe 76 86 Bungalow Parish Newport Road Council Moulsoe MIN 06 09/02292/FUL Church Farm Sherington Sherington 90 97 Church End Parish Sherington Council MIN 07 10/00100/FUL Glebe House Hanslope park Hanslope 102 106 Forest Road Parish Hanslope Council MIN 08 10/00271/FUL 7 Anglesey Court Loughton Park Loughton 109 118 Great Holm Parish Council Index cont……………… CLASS: OTHER APPLICATIONS No. Reference Address Ward Parish Report Plan(s) Page Page OTH 01 09/01872/FUL 1 Rose Cottages Wolverton Wolverton & 122 130 Mill End Greenleys Wolverton Mill Town Council OTH 02 09/01907/FUL 6 Twyford Lane Walton park Walton 135 140 Walnut Tree parish Council OTH 03 09/02161/FUL 16 Stanbridge Stony Stony 143 148 Court Stratford Stratford Stony Stratford Town Council OTH 04 09/02217/FUL 220A Wolverton Linford North Great Linford 152 159 Road Parish Blakelands Council OTH 05 10/00117/FUL 98 High Street Olney Olney Town 162 166 Olney Council OTH 06 10/00049/FUL 63 Wolverton Newport Newport 168 174 Road Pagnell North Pagnell Newport Pagnell Town Council OTH 07 10/00056/FUL 24 Sitwell Close Newport Newport 177 182 Newport Pagnell Pagnell North Pagnell Town Council CLASS: OTHER APPLICATIONS – HOUSES IN MULTIPLE OCCUPATION No.
    [Show full text]
  • 17/00838/OUT Description Outline Application for the Development Of
    ITEM 7(a) Application Number: 17/00838/OUT Description Outline application for the development of 200 dwelling houses, with all matters reserved AT Land to the East of, Eastfield Drive, Hanslope, FOR SiteplanUK LLP Target: 30th June 2018 Extension of Time: No Ward: Newport Pagnell North And Hanslope Parish: Hanslope Parish Council Report Author/Case Officer: Paul Keen Deputy Development Management Manager Contact Details: [email protected], 01908253239 Team Manager: Tracy Darke - 01908 252394, [email protected] 1.0 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that planning permission is refused for the reasons set out in section 7.0 of this report. 2.0 INTRODUCTION 2.1 The site 2.1.1 The application site is located adjacent to the eastern settlement boundary of Hanslope and 11km from central Milton Keynes. The site itself is generally flat, low- lying, grassland used for pastoral grazing, denoted by well-maintained mature hedgerow, with trees along its southern, western and eastern boundaries. It is currently within agricultural use (Grade 3 classification). 2.1.2 The site lies outside the development boundary of Hanslope and therefore within the open countryside. The site is however immediately adjacent to existing residential properties along Eastfield Drive and Newport Road. 2.1.3 Hanslope is defined as a ‘Selected Village’ within the Milton Keynes Core Strategy 2013. 2.1.4 There are a number of routes within the locality, the main routes being Newport Road adjacent to the south-east and Gold Street/Park Road/Long Street Road to the west at approximately 200 metres.
    [Show full text]
  • Buckingham Share As at 16 July 2021
    Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AM AMERSHAM 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4642 AMERSHAM ON THE HILL 75,869 44,973 30,896 59.3 DD S4645 AMERSHAM w COLESHILL 93,366 55,344 38,022 59.3 DD S4735 BEACONSFIELD ST MARY, MICHAEL & THOMAS 244,244 144,755 99,489 59.3 DD S4936 CHALFONT ST GILES 82,674 48,998 33,676 59.3 DD S4939 CHALFONT ST PETER 88,520 52,472 36,048 59.3 DD S4971 CHENIES & LITTLE CHALFONT 73,471 43,544 29,927 59.3 DD S4974 CHESHAM BOIS 87,147 51,654 35,493 59.3 DD S5134 DENHAM 70,048 41,515 28,533 59.3 DD S5288 FLAUNDEN 20,011 11,809 8,202 59.0 DD S5324 GERRARDS CROSS & FULMER 224,363 132,995 91,368 59.3 DD S5351 GREAT CHESHAM 239,795 142,118 97,677 59.3 DD S5629 LATIMER 17,972 7,218 10,754 40.2 DD S5970 PENN 46,370 27,487 18,883 59.3 DD S5971 PENN STREET w HOLMER GREEN 70,729 41,919 28,810 59.3 DD S6086 SEER GREEN 75,518 42,680 32,838 56.5 DD S6391 TYLERS GREEN 41,428 24,561 16,867 59.3 DD S6694 AMERSHAM DEANERY 5,976 5,976 0 0.0 Deanery Totals 1,557,501 920,018 637,483 59.1 R:\Store\Finance\FINANCE\2021\Share 2021\Share 2021Bucks Share20/07/202112:20 Deanery Share Statement : 2021 allocation 3AY AYLESBURY 2021 Cash Recd Bal as at % Paid Share To Date 16-Jul-21 To Date A/C No Parish £ £ £ % S4675 ASHENDON 5,108 2,975 2,133 58.2 DD S4693 ASTON SANDFORD 6,305 6,305 0 100.0 S4698 AYLESBURY ST MARY 49,527 23,000 26,527 46.4 S4699 AYLESBURY QUARRENDON ST PETER 7,711 4,492 3,219 58.3 DD S4700 AYLESBURY BIERTON 23,305 13,575 9,730 58.2 DD S4701 AYLESBURY HULCOTT ALL SAINTS
    [Show full text]
  • Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030
    Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Final version R September 2017 1 Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Published by Castlethorpe Parish Council for Pre-Submission Consultation under the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2012 and in accordance with EU Directive 2001/42. September 2017 Published by Castlethorpe Parish Council, 63 Thrupp Close, Castlethorpe, Milton Keynes MK19 7PL. Printed by Milton Keynes Council Print Services, 89-90 Priory Court, Bradwell Abbey, Milton Keynes MK13 9HF 2 Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan 2015-2030 Foreword I am very pleased to introduce our new respondents to the survey indicated a desire for Castlethorpe Neighbourhood Plan. additional housing with support for mainly The Plan is important because it defines how we smaller as well as some larger homes but with want our village to look over the next 15 years particular emphasis on affordable and in terms of development, building design, retirement/sheltered homes. However, there important buildings to be protected and local are no sites remaining within the existing Green Spaces. settlement boundary for additional housing. The Plan is powerful because, while it complies Following issue of the Plan for review, a response with national and Milton Keynes Planning was received from Carington Estates asking Policies, it defines local policies which must be that the field we call “Maltings 2” be designated followed by Milton Keynes Council when for housing. This site is bounded by Paddock considering planning applications. Close, Maltings Field, the railway and the It has taken a considerable amount of time and extension of Fox Covert Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated Electorate Proforma 11Oct2012
    Electoral data 2012 2018 Using this sheet: Number of councillors: 51 51 Fill in the cells for each polling district. Please make sure that the names of each parish, parish ward and unitary ward are Overall electorate: 178,504 190,468 correct and consistant. Check your data in the cells to the right. Average electorate per cllr: 3,500 3,735 Polling Electorate Electorate Number of Electorate Variance Electorate Description of area Parish Parish ward Unitary ward Name of unitary ward Variance 2018 district 2012 2018 cllrs per ward 2012 2012 2018 Bletchley & Fenny 3 10,385 -1% 11,373 2% Stratford Bradwell 3 9,048 -14% 8,658 -23% Campbell Park 3 10,658 2% 10,865 -3% Danesborough 1 3,684 5% 4,581 23% Denbigh 2 5,953 -15% 5,768 -23% Eaton Manor 2 5,976 -15% 6,661 -11% AA Church Green West Bletchley Church Green Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1872 2,032 Emerson Valley 3 12,269 17% 14,527 30% AB Denbigh Saints West Bletchley Saints Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1292 1,297 Furzton 2 6,511 -7% 6,378 -15% AC Denbigh Poets West Bletchley Poets Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1334 1,338 Hanslope Park 1 4,139 18% 4,992 34% AD Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Central Bletchley Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 2361 2,367 Linford North 2 6,700 -4% 6,371 -15% AE Simpson Simpson & Ashland Simpson Village Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 495 497 Linford South 2 7,067 1% 7,635 2% AF Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Fenny Stratford Bletchley & Fenny Stratford 1747 2,181 Loughton Park 3 12,577 20% 14,136 26% AG Granby Bletchley & Fenny Stratford Granby Bletchley
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of a Parish Council General Meeting Held on Monday 4Th February 2019 at 7.30 P.M
    Minutes of a Parish Council General Meeting held on Monday 4th February 2019 at 7.30 p.m. in the Village Hall PRESENT: Councillors Hinds, Stacey, Keane, Markham, Ayles, and Forgham, the Clerk, Ward Cllr Geary and 1 member of the public. There was no public session: 1 APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE ACTION 1.1 Cllrs Sawbridge reason illness - accepted. 2 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST 2.1. Cllr Ayles personal interest 5.1. Cllr Stacey pecuniary interest 5.3. 3 APPROVE MINUTES OF THE LAST MEETING 3.1 The minutes of 1st October (proposed Cllr Markham seconded Cllr Hinds), 3rd December (proposed Cllr Forgham seconded Cllr Ayles) and 7th January Clerk (proposed Cllr Keane seconded Cllr Forgham) were all agreed unanimously. 4 TO RECEIVE REPORTS 4.1. Clerks Report & Review of Actions (See Appendix A1). Matters arising: 4.1.1. Item 1 – Electrician still to provide a quote for installing the clock at the Village Hall. Clerk to then contact Janie Burns at MKC to apply for a ‘public arts’ grant. Clerk 4.1.2. Item 9 – Cllr Stacey has commissioned work to prune back trees overhanging war memorial. 4.2. Report on Visit by MKC Head of Highways to Castlethorpe and Hanslope. (Cllrs Ayles and Forgham) (See Appendix A2). Matters arising: 4.2.1. Cllr Ayles has requested that the Dips at the bottom of Castlethorpe Road be inspected after the next period of heavy rainfall 4.2.2. David Frost of MKC will attend the village to look at the village entrances with a view to considering vehicle speed controls.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction This Document Provides a Set of Thematic Maps on the Religion
    Census Atlas: Religion Introduction This document provides a set of thematic maps on the religion data by estate and settlement in Milton Keynes from 2011 Census data. You can download the tables of data used in the maps via the MKi Observatory using the link below: • Religion – Estates and Settlements Methodology These maps were created by the Research and Intelligence team at Milton Keynes Council based on 2011 Census data published by the Office for National Statistics. The 2011 Census data was not released at estate level. The Research and Intelligence team at Milton Keynes Council therefore added together Output Area (the smallest census geography) data to provide an estimate at estate level. As Output Areas (OAs) boundaries and estate boundaries do not always match, the data for OAs is weighted to estates. The data in the maps should therefore be seen as estimates based on 2011 Census data rather than actual figures. Full information on the methodology used to estimates the data at estate level can be viewed here: http://www.mkiobservatory.org.uk/document.aspx?id=10215&siteID=1026 Further Information Further information, data and analysis on the 2011 Census can be viewed on the MKi Observatory via the link below: http://www.mkiobservatory.org.uk/page.aspx?id=1924&siteID=1026 Email: [email protected] Tel: 01908 254257 2011 Census Atlas: Religion Map 1 % Christian Warrington % Christian Lavendon 63.6 to 73.1 (18) 55.1 to 63.6 (32) 48.3 to 55.1 (44) Olney Cold 40.8 to 48.3 (22) Brayfield No population (35) Weston Underwood
    [Show full text]
  • Details of Decisions Made on Planning Applications Week Beginning 07/05/2012
    Details of decisions made on planning applications week beginning 07/05/2012 12/00548/FUL Type: Delegated Proposed double storey side extension and Decision single storey rear extension Bletchley & Fenny Team: West At: 7 Staplehall Road Bletchley Milton Stratford Town Keynes MK1 1BQ Council Decision date: 08/05/2012 For: Mr Gary Llewellyn Decision: Application Refused ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/00586/FUL Type: Delegated Installation of security roller shutters to front of Decision shop Bletchley & Fenny Team: West At: 2A Cambridge Street Bletchley Milton Stratford Town Keynes MK2 2TP Council Decision date: 11/05/2012 For: Mr N Rana Decision: Application Permitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/00562/FUL Type: Delegated Erection of two storey side extension Decision Broughton & Team: East At: 11 Bowling Leys Middleton Milton Milton Keynes Keynes MK10 9BD Parish Council Decision date: 08/05/2012 For: Ms Alex Cirigottis Decision: Application Permitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/00609/CLUP Type: Delegated Conversion of existing outbuilding to study, WC Decision and sewing room Broughton & Team: East At: 7 Hopkins Close Milton Keynes Village Milton Keynes Milton Keynes MK10 9AS Parish Council Decision date: 08/05/2012 For: Mr & Mrs A Stringer Decision: Unlawful Use/Development
    [Show full text]
  • Decision Codes
    PAGE: 1 DETAILS OF DECISIONS MADE WEEK BEGINNING 26th July 2004 Decision Codes AGRAPP Agricultural Notification – Approved PD Permitted development (Planning Permission Not Required) AGRPPR Agricultural Notification – PEAVNZ Advert consent with standard conditions Planning Permission Required ALLOW Appeal Allowed PER Permitted APPWD Appeal Withdrawn PERLBZ Listed Building consent CATREE No objection to works to tree in Conservation Area PHEDGZ Hedgerow can be removed CSS Called in by the Secretary of State for decision PRESMZ Approval of reserved matters DEEMD Hazardous Substance Deemed Consent PTALLW Appeal allowed in part DISMIS Appeal Dismissed PTCON Permit works to tree in CA HEDGN Hedgerow Notice Not Required PTPOZ Tree preservation order consent HZPER Hazardous Substances Approval RCONAZ Conservation area consent refusal LAWFUL Lawful Use/Development READVZ Advert consent refused LEGAL Subject to a legal Agreement REF Refused NCAD Negative certificate of appropriate development REFLBZ Listed Building consent refused NDET Appeal RETURN Invalid application returned NOELB No objections Ecclesiastical L.B RHEDGZ Hedgerow to be retained NOOBJ No objections raised Circ. 18/84 or 14/90 RTCON Trees in CA objections/split decision NPW Application not proceeded with RTPOZ Tree preservation order consent refused PANRQ Prior approval not required SOSA Approved by Secretary of State PAREQ Prior approval required SPLITZ Advert split decision PAREQA Prior approval required and approved TCASPL Split response to trees in CA notification PAREQR Prior
    [Show full text]
  • An Unlikely Place to Find Village Life Graham Norwood Explores Buckinghamshire’S Maligned Marmite Town and Its Bucolic Surprises
    Source: The Daily Telegraph {Property} Edition: Country: UK Date: Saturday 23, March 2019 Page: 10,11 Area: 1557 sq. cm Circulation: ABC 345618 Daily Ad data: page rate £46,000.00, scc rate £214.00 Phone: 020 7931 2000 Keyword: Stacks Property Search An unlikely place to find village life Graham Norwood explores Buckinghamshire’s maligned Marmite town and its bucolic surprises ay “Milton Keynes” to Eighth Street and (my favourite) most people and they V6 Grafton Street. think of brutalist archi- So describing it now as a grey com- tecture, roads lined with muter haven is hardly surprising, yet S Sixties-style blocks of that is only half the story of Milton flats and offices, and a Keynes. For surrounding this very town full of London’s Marmite town – some love it, others overspill residents. passionately hate it – there are several That’s hardly surprising, as it was de- indisputably lovely villages, many signed just over half a century ago as a with surprisingly good-value homes futuristic new town, when those de- given their size and the charm of their scriptions were kinder than they are local communities. today. Back then, car travel was being Look at Aspley Guise, an elegant vil- encouraged and navigation was easy lage with 13th-century roots and more thanks to its US-style grid pattern and than 20 Georgian listed buildings. It’s functional road names such as South laden with footpaths and bridleways, while Woburn Abbey and the local golf and east. Or, not far away, you find Wo- club are close by.
    [Show full text]
  • Details of Decisions Made on Planning Applications Week Beginning 8/10/2007
    Details of decisions made on planning applications week beginning 8/10/2007 07/00416/MKCOD3 Type: Delegated EXTENSION FOR USE AS SURE START Decision CHILDRENS CENTRE, AMENDMENT TO SITE BOUNDARY, REVISED CAR PARK AND EXTERNAL ALTERATIONS Bletchley & Fenny Team: South At: Knowles Nursery Queensway Bletchley Stratford Town Milton Keynes Council Decision date: 09/10/2007 For: Milton Keynes Early Years And Child Care Decision: Council's Own Development (REG 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/01438/FUL Type: Delegated RE-SITING AND REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING Decision RECYLING FACILITIES INCORPORATING THE REMOVAL OF 10 NO. PARKING SPACES AND THE REINSTATEMENT OF 17 NO. PARKING SPACES Bletchley & Fenny Team: South At: Tesco Stores Ltd Watling Street Fenny Stratford Town Stratford Bletchley Milton Keynes MK1 Council 1DD Decision date: 09/10/2007 For: Tesco Stores Limited Decision: Application Permitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/01440/FUL Type: Delegated LOFT CONVERSION Decision Bletchley & Fenny Team: South At: 41A Staple Hall Road Bletchley Milton Stratford Town Keynes MK1 1BQ Council Decision date: 09/10/2007 For: Mr Derek Pennington Decision: Application Permitted ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 07/00490/MIN Type: Delegated VARIATION OF CONDITION 5 OF PERMISSION Decision 04/00125/MIN
    [Show full text]