DOCSLIB.ORG

123 Subpart I—Offshore Radiotelephone Service

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
123 Subpart I—Offshore Radiotelephone Service Federal Communications Commission § 22.1007 receipted fax on the applicable offend- Subpart I—Offshore ing licensee, with a copy transmitted Radiotelephone Service by the fastest available means to the Washington, DC office of the Commis- § 22.1001 Scope. sion’s Public Safety and Homeland Se- The rules in this subpart govern the curity Bureau. licensing and operation of offshore ra- [69 FR 67834, Nov. 22, 2004, as amended at 70 diotelephone stations. The licensing FR 76707, Dec. 28, 2005; 71 FR 69038, Nov. 29, and operation of these stations and 2006] systems is also subject to rules else- where in this part that apply generally § 22.973 Information exchange. to the public mobile services. However, in case of conflict, the rules in this (a) Prior notification. Public safety/CII subpart govern. licensees may notify a part 90 ESMR or cellular radiotelephone licensee that § 22.1003 Eligibility. they wish to receive prior notification Any eligible entity (see § 22.7) may of the activation or modification of apply for central station license(s) and/ part 90 ESMR or cellular radio- or offshore subscriber licenses under telephone cell sites in their area. this subpart. Thereafter, the part 90 ESMR or cel- [70 FR 19312, Apr. 13, 2005] lular radiotelephone licensee must pro- vide the following information to the § 22.1005 Priority of service. public safety/CII licensee at least 10 Facilities in the Offshore Radio- business days before a new cell site is telephone Service are intended pri- activated or an existing cell site is marily for rendition of public message modified: service between offshore subscriber and (1) Location; central stations. However, they may (2) Effective radiated power; also be used to render private leased (3) Antenna height; line communication service, provided (4) Channels available for use. that such usage does not reduce or im- (b) Purpose of prior notification. The pair the extent or quality of commu- prior coordination of cell sites is for in- nication service which would be avail- formational purposes only. Public safe- able, in the absence of private leased ty/CII licensees are not afforded the line service, to the general public re- right to accept or reject the activation ceiving or subsequently requesting public message service from an off- of a proposed cell or to unilaterally re- shore central station. quire changes in its operating param- eters. The principal purposes of notifi- § 22.1007 Channels for offshore radio- cation are to: telephone systems. (1) Allow a public safety licensee to The channels listed in this section advise the part 90 of this chapter are allocated for paired assignment to ESMR or Cellular Radiotelephone li- transmitters located in the specified censee whether it believes a proposed geographical zones that provide off- cell will generate unacceptable inter- shore radiotelephone service. All chan- ference; nels have a bandwidth of 20 kHz and (2) Permit Cellular Radiotelephone or are designated by their center fre- part 90 of this chapter ESMR licensees quencies in MegaHertz. to make voluntary changes in cell pa- (a) Zone A—Southern Louisiana. The rameters when a public safety licensee geographical area in Zone A is bounded alerts them to possible interference; as follows: and From longitude W.87°45′ on the East to lon- (3) Rapidly identify the source if in- gitude W.94°00′ on the West and from the 4.8 terference is encountered when the cell kilometer (3 mile) limit along the Gulf of is activated. Mexico shoreline on the North to the limit of the Outer Continental Shelf on the South. [69 FR 67834, Nov. 22, 2004] (1) These channels may be assigned for use by offshore central (base/fixed) 123 VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:50 Nov 24, 2014 Jkt 232208 PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\47\47V2.TXT 31 § 22.1007 47 CFR Ch. I (10–1–14 Edition) or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- Central Subscriber porary fixed, surface and/or airborne mobile) as indicated, for voice-grade 488.950 ..... 491.950 general communications: (6) These channels may be assigned Central Subscriber Central Subscriber for use by offshore central (base/fixed) or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- 488.025 ........ 491.025 488.225 ........ 491.225 porary fixed, surface and/or airborne 488.050 ........ 491.050 488.250 ........ 491.250 mobile) as indicated, for emergency 488.075 ........ 491.075 488.275 ........ 491.275 488.100 ........ 491.100 488.300 ........ 491.300 shut-off remote control telemetry, en- 488.125 ........ 491.125 488.325 ........ 491.325 vironmental data acquisition and dis- 488.150 ........ 491.150 488.350 ........ 491.350 seminations, or facsimile trans- 488.175 ........ 491.175 488.375 ........ 491.375 missions. 488.200 ........ 491.200 488.400 ........ 491.400 Central Subscriber Central Subscriber (2) These channels may be assigned for use by offshore central (base/fixed) 489.000 ....... 492.000 489.200 ....... 492.200 489.025 ....... 492.025 489.225 ....... 492.225 or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- 489.050 ....... 492.050 489.250 ....... 492.250 porary fixed, surface and/or airborne 489.075 ....... 492.075 489.275 ....... 492.275 mobile) as indicated, for voice-grade 489.100 ....... 492.100 489.300 ....... 492.300 general communications and private 489.125 ....... 492.125 489.325 ....... 492.325 line service: 489.150 ....... 492.150 489.350 ....... 492.350 489.175 ....... 492.175 489.375 ....... 492.375 Central Subscriber Central Subscriber (7) These channels may be assigned 488.425 ........ 491.425 488.575 ........ 491.575 for use by offshore central (base/fixed) 488.450 ........ 491.450 488.600 ........ 491.600 or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- 488.475 ........ 491.475 488.625 ........ 491.625 porary fixed, surface and/or airborne 488.500 ........ 491.500 488.650 ........ 491.650 488.525 ........ 491.525 488.675 ........ 491.675 mobile) as indicated, for private line 488.550 ........ 491.550 488.700 ........ 491.700 service: (3) These channels may be assigned Central Subscriber Central Subscriber for use by relay stations in systems 489.400 ........ 492.400 489.725 ........ 492.725 where it would be impractical to pro- 489.425 ........ 492.425 489.750 ........ 492.750 vide offshore radiotelephone service 489.450 ........ 492.450 489.775 ........ 492.775 without the use of relay stations. 489.475 ........ 492.475 489.800 ........ 492.800 489.500 ........ 492.500 489.825 ........ 492.825 489.525 ........ 492.525 489.850 ........ 492.850 Central Subscriber Central Subscriber 489.550 ........ 492.550 489.875 ........ 492.875 488.725 ........ 491.725 488.775 ........ 491.775 489.575 ........ 492.575 489.900 ........ 492.900 488.750 ........ 491.750 488.800 ........ 491.800 489.600 ........ 492.600 489.925 ........ 492.925 489.625 ........ 492.625 489.950 ........ 492.950 489.650 ........ 492.650 489.975 ........ 492.975 (4) These channels may be assigned 489.675 ........ 492.675 490.000 ........ 493.000 for use by offshore central (base/fixed) 489.700 ........ 492.700 or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- porary fixed, surface and/or airborne (8) Interstitial channels. Interstitial mobile) as indicated, for emergency channels are those with center fre- communications involving protection quencies offset by ±12.5 kHz from the of life and property. listed center frequencies. The FCC may assign interstitial channels to offshore Central Subscriber Central Subscriber stations in Zone A subject to the fol- 488.825 ........ 491.825 488.875 ........ 491.875 lowing conditions: 488.850 ........ 491.850 488.900 ........ 491.900 (i) Offshore stations transmitting on interstitial channels must be located (5) These channels may be assigned east of W.92° longitude. for use by offshore central (base/fixed) (ii) Operations on interstitial chan- or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- nels are considered to be secondary to porary fixed, surface and/or airborne operations on channels with the listed mobile) as indicated, for emergency center frequencies. auto alarm and voice transmission per- (iii) Offshore stations operating on taining to emergency conditions only. interstitial channels must be used only 124 VerDate Sep<11>2014 12:50 Nov 24, 2014 Jkt 232208 PO 00000 Frm 00134 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Q:\47\47V2.TXT 31 Federal Communications Commission § 22.1007 for voice grade general communica- (c) Zone C—Southern Texas. The geo- tions or to provide for private line graphical area in Zone C is bounded as service. follows: NOTE TO PARAGRAPH (a) OF § 22.1007: These Longitude W.94°00′ on the East, the 4.8 kil- channels are contained in UHF TV Channel ometer (3 mile) limit on the North and West, 17. a 282 kilometer (175 mile) radius from the reference point at Linares, N.L., Mexico on (b) Zone B—Southern Louisiana— the Southwest, latitude N.26°00′ on the Texas. (1) The geographical area in South, and the limits of the outer conti- Zone B is bounded as follows: nental shelf on the Southeast. From longitude W.87°45′ on the East to lon- (1) These channels may be assigned gitude W.95°00′ on the West and from the 4.8 for use by offshore central (base/fixed) kilometer (3 mile) limit along the Gulf of or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- Mexico shoreline on the North to the limit of porary fixed, surface and/or airborne the Outer Continental Shelf on the South. mobile) as indicated, for emergency (2) These channels may be assigned auto alarm and voice transmission per- for use by offshore central (base/fixed) taining to emergency conditions only. or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- porary fixed, surface and/or airborne Central Subscriber mobile) as indicated, for voice-grade 476.950 ..... 479.950 general communications and private line service: (2) These channels may be assigned for use by offshore central (base/fixed) Central Subscriber Central Subscriber or subscriber stations (fixed, tem- 485.025 .......
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Federal Communications Commission § 74.789
    Federal Communications Commission § 74.789 In addition, any outstanding construc- (3) Applications for extension of time tion permit (analog or digital) for an shall be filed not later than May 1, channel above Channel 51 will be re- 2015, absent a showing of sufficient rea- scinded on December 31, 2011, and any sons for late filing. pending application (analog or digital) (d) For construction deadlines occur- for a channel above Channel 51 will be ring after September 1, 2015, the tolling dismissed on December 31, 2011, if the provisions of § 73.3598 of this chapter permittee has not submitted a digital shall apply. displacement application by 11:59 pm (e) A low power television, TV trans- local on September 1, 2011. lator or Class A television station that holds a construction permit for an un- [69 FR 69333, Nov. 29, 2004, as amended at 74 FR 23655, May 20, 2009; 76 FR 44828, July 27, built analog and corresponding unbuilt 2011] digital station and fails to complete construction of the analog station by § 74.788 Digital construction period. the expiration date on the analog con- struction permit shall forfeit both the (a) Each original construction permit analog and digital construction per- for the construction of a new digital mits notwithstanding a later expira- low power television or television tion date on the digital construction translator station shall specify a pe- permit. riod of three years from the date of (f) A low power television, TV trans- issuance of the original construction lator or Class A television station that permit within which construction shall holds a construction permit for an un- be completed and application for li- built analog and corresponding unbuilt cense filed.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Radio Broadcasting in Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1963 History of radio broadcasting in Montana Ron P. Richards The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Richards, Ron P., "History of radio broadcasting in Montana" (1963). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 5869. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/5869 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE HISTORY OF RADIO BROADCASTING IN MONTANA ty RON P. RICHARDS B. A. in Journalism Montana State University, 1959 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Journalism MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY 1963 Approved by: Chairman, Board of Examiners Dean, Graduate School Date Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number; EP36670 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMT Oiuartation PVUithing UMI EP36670 Published by ProQuest LLC (2013).
    [Show full text]
  • All Full-Power Television Stations by Dma, Indicating Those Terminating Analog Service Before Or on February 17, 2009
    ALL FULL-POWER TELEVISION STATIONS BY DMA, INDICATING THOSE TERMINATING ANALOG SERVICE BEFORE OR ON FEBRUARY 17, 2009. (As of 2/20/09) NITE HARD NITE LITE SHIP PRE ON DMA CITY ST NETWORK CALLSIGN LITE PLUS WVR 2/17 2/17 LICENSEE ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX NBC KRBC-TV MISSION BROADCASTING, INC. ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX CBS KTAB-TV NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC. ABILENE-SWEETWATER ABILENE TX FOX KXVA X SAGE BROADCASTING CORPORATION ABILENE-SWEETWATER SNYDER TX N/A KPCB X PRIME TIME CHRISTIAN BROADCASTING, INC ABILENE-SWEETWATER SWEETWATER TX ABC/CW (DIGITALKTXS-TV ONLY) BLUESTONE LICENSE HOLDINGS INC. ALBANY ALBANY GA NBC WALB WALB LICENSE SUBSIDIARY, LLC ALBANY ALBANY GA FOX WFXL BARRINGTON ALBANY LICENSE LLC ALBANY CORDELE GA IND WSST-TV SUNBELT-SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS LTD ALBANY DAWSON GA PBS WACS-TV X GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ALBANY PELHAM GA PBS WABW-TV X GEORGIA PUBLIC TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION ALBANY VALDOSTA GA CBS WSWG X GRAY TELEVISION LICENSEE, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ADAMS MA ABC WCDC-TV YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY NBC WNYT WNYT-TV, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY ABC WTEN YOUNG BROADCASTING OF ALBANY, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY ALBANY NY FOX WXXA-TV NEWPORT TELEVISION LICENSE LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY AMSTERDAM NY N/A WYPX PAXSON ALBANY LICENSE, INC. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY PITTSFIELD MA MYTV WNYA VENTURE TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, LLC ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CW WCWN FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C. ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY PBS WMHT WMHT EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY SCHENECTADY NY CBS WRGB FREEDOM BROADCASTING OF NEW YORK LICENSEE, L.L.C.
    [Show full text]
  • MEMORANDUM January 9, 2020 To: Subcommittee on Communications and Technology Members and Staff Fr: Committee on Energy And
    MEMORANDUM January 9, 2020 To: Subcommittee on Communications and Technology Members and Staff Fr: Committee on Energy and Commerce Staff Re: Legislative Hearing on “Lifting Voices: Legislation to Promote Media Marketplace Diversity” On Wednesday, January 15, 2020, at 10:30 a.m. in room 2322 of the Rayburn House Office Building, the Subcommittee on Communications and Technology will hold a legislative hearing entitled, “Lifting Voices: Legislation to Promote Media Marketplace Diversity.” I. BACKGROUND A. The Current Landscape There is wide consensus that ownership of traditional media distribution outlets – broadcast and multichannel video programming distributor (MVPD) - by women and people of color is very low.1 According to the most recent data from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), from October 2015, ownership of full power commercial television stations and commercial FM radio stations by women and people of color was around 10 percent.2 The FCC does not collect similar ownership data for MVPDs. Historically, a tax certificate program helped increase diversity of broadcast ownership. Using authority granted it by Congress in 1943,3 the FCC created the minority ownership tax certificate program in 1978, to address the dearth of broadcast ownership by people of color.4 The program provided tax breaks to companies that sold a radio or television station to a 1 See, e.g., Federal Communications Commission, Third Report on Ownership of Commercial Broadcast Stations (May 10, 2017); Government Accountability Office, Economic Factors Influence the Number of Media Outlets in Local Markets, While Ownership by Minorities and Women Appears Limited and Is Difficult to Assess (April 11, 2008) (GAO 08-383).
    [Show full text]
  • NAB's Guide to Careers in Television
    NAB’s Guide to Careers in Television Second Edition by Liz Chuday TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents…………………………………..……………………......... 1-3 Introduction………………………………………………………………... ......... 4 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………....... 6 A Word About Station Ownership………………..…………… ..................…7 The General Administration Department…………………. ...................... 8-9 General Manager……………..……………….……………… ..................... 8 Station Manager……..…………………………………………….. .............. 8 Human Resources…………………………..………………........................ 8 Executive Assistant…………………………..…………………… ............... 9 Business Manager/Controller…………………………… ........................... 9 The Sales and Marketing Department………………………….............. 10-11 Director of Sales…………………..………………………….. ................... 10 General Sales Manager…………………………………………................ 10 National Sales Manager……...……………………..……......................... 10 Marketing Director or Director of Non-Traditional Revenue……….……………...................... 10 Local Sales Manager..……………………………………………. ............. 11 Account Executive..……………………….………………………............. .11 Sales Assistant..………………………….…………………………............ 11 The Traffic Department………………..…………………………................... 12 Operations Manager…………………………………………..................... 12 Traffic Manager…………………………………….………………. ............ 12 Traffic Supervisor………………………………….……………….............. 12 Traffic Assistant…………………………………………….………............. 12 Order Entry Coordinator/Log Editors………………………. .................... 12 The Research Department……………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Fcc Written Response to the Gao Report on Dtv Table of Contents
    FCC WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE GAO REPORT ON DTV TABLE OF CONTENTS I. TECHNICAL GOALS 1. Develop Technical Standard for Digital Broadcast Operations……………………… 1 2. Pre-Transition Channel Assignments/Allotments……………………………………. 5 3. Construction of Pre-Transition DTV Facilities……………………………………… 10 4. Transition Broadcast Stations to Final Digital Operations………………………….. 16 5. Facilitate the production of set top boxes and other devices that can receive digital broadcast signals in connection with subscription services………………….. 24 6. Facilitate the production of television sets and other devices that can receive digital broadcast signals……………………………………………………………… 29 II. POLICY GOALS 1. Protect MVPD Subscribers in their Ability to Continue Watching their Local Broadcast Stations After the Digital Transition……………………………….. 37 2. Maximize Consumer Benefits of the Digital Transition……………………………... 42 3. Educate consumers about the DTV transition……………………………………….. 48 4. Identify public interest opportunities afforded by digital transition…………………. 53 III. CONSUMER OUTREACH GOALS 1. Prepare and Distribute Publications to Consumers and News Media………………. 59 2. Participate in Events and Conferences……………………………………………… 60 3. Coordinate with Federal, State and local Entities and Community Stakeholders…… 62 4. Utilize the Commission’s Advisory Committees to Help Identify Effective Strategies for Promoting Consumer Awareness…………………………………….. 63 5. Maintain and Expand Information and Resources Available via the Internet………. 63 IV. OTHER CRITICAL ELEMENTS 1. Transition TV stations in the cross-border areas from analog to digital broadcasting by February 17, 2009………………………………………………………………… 70 2. Promote Consumer Awareness of NTIA’s Digital-to-Analog Converter Box Coupon Program………………………………………………………………………72 I. TECHNICAL GOALS General Overview of Technical Goals: One of the most important responsibilities of the Commission, with respect to the nation’s transition to digital television, has been to shepherd the transformation of television stations from analog broadcasting to digital broadcasting.
    [Show full text]
  • PMCM TV Petition.Wpd
    NO. In the Supreme Court of the United States PMCM TV, LLC, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION, et al., Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI Donald J. Evans Counsel of Record Fletcher, Heald and Hildreth, PLC 1300 N. 17th St. 11th Floor Arlington, VA 22209 (703) 812-0400 [email protected] Counsel for Petitioner PMCM TV, LLC Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i QUESTIONS PRESENTED (a) Should courts continue to follow the Chevron policy of deferring to administrative agency interpretations of federal statutes when the federal judiciary is not only uniquely qualified to undertake such interpretations but is also charged by the Constitution with the exclusive power to do so? (b) Where a statute is plain on its face by every canon of statutory construction, should a court under Chevron nevertheless defer to an agency’s contrary interpretation of the statute? (c) The Cable Television Consumer Protection and Competition Act of 1992 provides that a television station entitled to must-carry status must be carried by cable systems on the channel on which it “broadcasts over the air.” The D.C. Circuit below determined that Congress intended by this language to refer to a station’s virtual channel – not the channel associated with the frequency on which it transmits its signal through the air but a different channel number incorporated into the broadcast channel stream. However, in order to qualify for must-carry status at all, a TV station must “operate” on the channel which it is assigned by the FCC’s table of allotments for broadcast transmissions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 MAJOR BROADCASTERS LAUNCH NEXTGEN TV on FIVE LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS in OKLAHOMA CITY, OK KOCO-TV, KFOR-TV, KOKH-TV, KOCB A
    MAJOR BROADCASTERS LAUNCH NEXTGEN TV ON FIVE LOCAL TELEVISION STATIONS IN OKLAHOMA CITY, OK KOCO-TV, KFOR-TV, KOKH-TV, KOCB and KAUT Begin Broadcasting with New Technology Oklahoma City, OK – October 8, 2020 – Five leading local television stations in Oklahoma City, OK, including KOCO-TV (ABC), KFOR-TV (NBC), KOKH-TV (Fox), KOCB (CW) and KAUT (IND), today became among the first in the nation to begin broadcasting with NEXTGEN TV, a revolutionary new digital broadcast technology. Based on the same fundamental technology as the Internet, digital applications, and other web services, NEXTGEN TV can support a wide range of features currently in development, such as immersive audio and video (up to 4K), broadcasting to mobile devices, personalized viewing tools, and advanced emergency alerts providing rich media instead of simple text messages. NEXTGEN TV also allows full integration with 5G and other broadband-delivered Internet content. Powered by ATSC 3.0, NEXTGEN TV is the most significant broadcast technology upgrade ever. Today’s launch in Oklahoma City is one of the first in the country for NEXTGEN TV and follows a decade of development of the new technology and months of planning and preparation by the local stations. BitPath, which is developing new data broadcasting services, led the planning process and coordinated efforts across the five television stations. The participating stations have cooperated to ensure that current programming remains available to all viewers, regardless of whether their television service is provided over-the air or by a cable or satellite company. Antenna viewers can simply rescan their TV sets to ensure full service.
    [Show full text]
  • March 10, 2020 FCC FACT SHEET* Rules Governing the Use Of
    March 10, 2020 FCC FACT SHEET* Rules Governing the Use of Distributed Transmission System Technologies Authorizing Permissive Use of the “Next Generation” Broadcast Television Standard Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – MB Docket No. 20-74 and GN Docket No. 16-142 Background: Section 73.626 of the Commission’s rules governs the use of a distributed transmission system (DTS) by broadcast television stations. DTS uses multiple transmitter sites within a station’s authorized service area, each operating on the same channel, in order to provide better service to the public. The Commission has recognized numerous potential benefits of DTS technology, including the ability to serve hard-to-reach viewers, improved indoor and mobile reception, and the more efficient use of TV spectrum. The Commission’s current rules regarding DTS use were first adopted more than a decade ago in advance of the digital television (DTV) transition, which was completed for full-power television stations in 2009. In 2017, when the Commission authorized broadcast television stations to use the Next Gen TV, or ATSC 3.0, transmission standard on a voluntary, market-driven basis—while continuing to deliver current-generation DTV service to their viewers using the ATSC 1.0 standard—it found that the existing DTS rules were adequate to authorize DTS use with ATSC 3.0 and stated that the Commission would revisit the rules in the future if appropriate. In October 2019, America’s Public Television Stations and the National Association of Broadcasters filed a Joint Petition for Rulemaking seeking to amend section 73.626 to make technical changes to the DTS rules that could enable the broadcast television industry to expand DTS use.
    [Show full text]
  • A Proposal for Wired City Television
    Washington University Law Review Volume 1968 Issue 1 Communications & the Future—Part II January 1968 A Proposal for Wired City Television Harold J. Barnett Washington University in St. Louis Edward Greenberg Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Communications Law Commons Recommended Citation Harold J. Barnett and Edward Greenberg, A Proposal for Wired City Television, 1968 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (1968). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol1968/iss1/4 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY LAW QUARTERLY Volume 1968 Winter, 1968 Number 1 A PROPOSAL FOR WIRED CITY TELEVISION* HAROLD J. BARNETT AND EDWARD GREENBERG** The present television system could improve its service to the public. Its programs are not as diverse or numerous as books or magazines. There is virtually no pay-TV to serve consumers who would prefer to pay di- rectly for specialized programs. Tax-supported public television is an emaciated industry. Network TV offerings tend, for good reason, to em- phasize mass audiences. Commercial TV time is heavily laden with ad- vertisements. The reason for program deficiencies is not that those who run networks and stations are incompetent. The difficulty is that, under present arrange- ments, there are too few television signals being delivered to homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Protecting Broadcast Television Receivers from Inter-Service Interference
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 15-141 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Expanding the Economic and Innovation ) GN Docket No. 12-268 Opportunities of Spectrum Through Incentive ) Auctions ) ) Office of Engineering and Technology Releases ) ET Docket No. 13-26 and Seeks Comment on Updated OET-69 ) Software ) ) Office of Engineering and Technology Seeks to ) ET Docket No. 14-14 Supplement the Incentive Auction Proceeding ) Record Regarding Potential Interference Between ) Broadcast Television and Wireless Services ) THIRD REPORT AND ORDER AND FIRST ORDER ON RECONSIDERATION Adopted: October 21, 2015 Released: October 26, 2015 By the Commission: Commissioner Pai approving in part, concurring in part, and issuing a separate statement; Commissioner O’Rielly concurring and issuing a separate statement. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. THIRD REPORT AND ORDER ........................................................................................................... 2 A. Protecting Broadcast Television Receivers from Inter-Service Interference................................... 5 1. Threshold for Interference from Wireless Operations to Television Receivers in the 600 MHz Band. ......................................................................................................................... 6 2. Determining Potential Interference
    [Show full text]
  • The Satellite Technology Demonstration's Experiences with Varied Terrestrial Signal Distribution Methods
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 115 235 95 IR 002 778 AUTHOR Anderson, Frank; And Others TITLE The Satellite Technology Demonstration's Experiences with Varied Terrestrial Signal Distribution Methods. Satellite Technology Demonstration, Technical Report No. 0335. INSTITUTION Federation of Rocky Mountain States, Inc., Denver, Colo. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (DREW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 75 NOTE 13p.; For related documents see IR 002 769-793 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.58 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS Audiences; *Broadcast Reception Equipment; Broadcast Television; Closed Circuit Television; Communication Satellites; Community Antennas; *Delivery Systems; Demonstration Projects; Educational Television; Fixed Service Television; Microwave Pelay Systems; Regional Programs; *Telecommunication; *Video Equipment IDENTIFIERS *Satellite Technology Demonstration ABSTRACT Though the Satellite Technology Demonstration (STD) system had the capacity to deliver quality broadcast signals to specially designed ground terminals its budget did not provide for more than one receiver in each rural community. Inorder to translate the satellite signal into a broadcast available to the individual home viewer, several systems were available:(1) rebroadcast the signal via standard public television; (2) use microwave for direct transmission from one location to another; (3) use a translator station to repeat and amplify the signal in isolated locations; And (4) rebroadcast the signal via community cable television. In each region where STD was employed, different combinations of technology were used to reach the largest audiencepossible. Unique plans were developed in Roundup, Montana; Ely, Nevada; Osborn, Idaho; and Elko, Neveda. Based on this experiment, future telecommunications managers are advised to learn to: (1) promote consensus among participants; (2) be willing to use a variety of technological adaptations; (3) provide potential users with sample programs; and (4) consider the size of the audience and the cost of the broadcast well in advance.
    [Show full text]