DOCSLIB.ORG

CER 76: Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CER 76: Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 76 Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults Comparative Effectiveness Review Number 76 Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I Prepared by: Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center Oregon Health & Science University Portland, OR Investigators: Roger Chou, M.D. Daniel Hartung, Pharm.D., M.P.H. Basmah Rahman, M.P.H. Ngoc Wasson, M.P.H. Erika Cottrell, Ph.D. Rongwei Fu, Ph.D. AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-EHC113-EF November 2012 This report is based on research conducted by the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) under contract to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Rockville, MD (Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its contents; the findings and conclusions do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. Therefore, no statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The information in this report is intended to help health care decisionmakers—patients and clinicians, health system leaders, and policymakers, among others—make well-informed decisions and thereby improve the quality of health care services. This report is not intended to be a substitute for the application of clinical judgment. Anyone who makes decisions concerning the provision of clinical care should consider this report in the same way as any medical reference and in conjunction with all other pertinent information, i.e., in the context of available resources and circumstances presented by individual patients. This report may be used, in whole or in part, as the basis for the development of clinical practice guidelines and other quality enhancement tools, or as a basis for reimbursement and coverage policies. AHRQ or U.S. Department of Health and Human Services endorsement of such derivative products or actions may not be stated or implied. This document is in the public domain and may be used and reprinted without special permission, except those copyrighted materials that are clearly noted in the document. Further reproduction of those copyrighted materials is prohibited without the specific permission of copyright holders. Persons using assistive technology may not be able to fully access information in this report. For assistance contact [email protected]. None of the investigators have any affiliations or financial involvement that conflicts with the material presented in this report. Suggested citation: Chou R, Hartung D, Rahman B, Wasson N, Cottrell E, Fu R. Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 76. (Prepared by Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10057-I.) AHRQ Publication No. 12(13)-EHC113-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. November 2012. www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reports/final.cfm. ii Preface The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) conducts the Effective Health Care Program as part of its mission to organize knowledge and make it available to inform decisions about health care. As part of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, Congress directed AHRQ to conduct and support research on the comparative outcomes, clinical effectiveness, and appropriateness of pharmaceuticals, devices, and health care services to meet the needs of Medicare, Medicaid, and the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP). AHRQ has an established network of Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs) that produce Evidence Reports/Technology Assessments to assist public- and private-sector organizations in their efforts to improve the quality of health care. The EPCs now lend their expertise to the Effective Health Care Program by conducting comparative effectiveness reviews (CERs) of medications, devices, and other relevant interventions, including strategies for how these items and services can best be organized, managed, and delivered. Systematic reviews are the building blocks underlying evidence-based practice; they focus attention on the strength and limits of evidence from research studies about the effectiveness and safety of a clinical intervention. In the context of developing recommendations for practice, systematic reviews are useful because they define the strengths and limits of the evidence, clarifying whether assertions about the value of the intervention are based on strong evidence from clinical studies. For more information about systematic reviews, see www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/reference/purpose.cfm. AHRQ expects that CERs will be helpful to health plans, providers, purchasers, government programs, and the health care system as a whole. In addition, AHRQ is committed to presenting information in different formats so that consumers who make decisions about their own and their family’s health can benefit from the evidence. Transparency and stakeholder input from are essential to the Effective Health Care Program. Please visit the Web site (www.effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov) to see draft research questions and reports or to join an email list to learn about new program products and opportunities for input. Comparative Effectiveness Reviews will be updated regularly. We welcome comments on this CER. They may be sent by mail to the Task Order Officer named below at: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Road, Rockville, MD 20850, or by email to [email protected]. Carolyn M. Clancy, M.D. Jean Slutsky, P.A., M.S.P.H. Director Director, Center for Outcomes and Evidence Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Stephanie Chang, M.D., M.P.H. Christine Chang M.D., M.P.H. Director Task Order Officer Evidence-based Practice Program Center for Outcomes and Evidence Center for Outcomes and Evidence Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality iii Acknowledgments We thank our colleagues at the Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Robin Paynter, M.L.I.S., and Rose Campbell, M.L.I.S., for conducting the literature searches, and Leah Williams, B.S., Ed Reid, M.A., and Elaine Graham, M.L.S. for editorial support. We appreciate and acknowledge the contributions of AHRQ Task Order Officer Christine Chang, M.D., M.P.H.; USPSTF Medical Officer Iris Mabry-Hernandez, M.D., M.P.H.; and Evidence-based Practice Center Program Associate Editor Kathleen N. Lohr, Ph.D. We also thank the Key Informants, members of the Technical Expert Panel, and Peer Reviewers. Key Informants Miriam Alter, Ph.D., M.P.H. John Ward, M.D., M.P.H. Professor, Infectious Disease Epidemiology Director, Viral Hepatitis Division Department of Internal Medicine Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Division of Infectious Disease Atlanta, GA University of Texas Austin, TX Barbara Yawn, M.D., M.Sc., F.A.A.C.P. Director of Research, Olmstead Medical Michael Ninburg, M.P.A. Center Executive Director University of Minnesota Hepatitis Education Project Minneapolis, MN Seattle, WA Janet Patin, M.D. Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) Dunes Family Clinic Reedsport, OR iv Technical Expert Panel Miriam Alter, Ph.D., M.P.H. Bruce A. Runyon, M.D. Professor, Infectious Disease Epidemiology Chief, Liver Service Department of Internal Medicine Professor of Medicine Division of Infectious Disease Loma Linda University Medical Center University of Texas Loma Linda, CA Austin, TX Bryce Smith, Ph.D. Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo, Ph.D., M.D. Viral Hepatitis Division Associate Professor of Medicine and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Epidemiology & Biostatistics Atlanta, GA University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA Donna E. Sweet, M.D., M.A.C.P. American College of Physicians Robert Gish, M.D. Professor of Medicine Co-director, Chief of Clinical Hepatology University of Kansas School of Medicine Professor of Clinical Medicine Wichita, KS University of California, San Diego San Diego, CA Timothy Wilt, M.D., M.P.H. Professor, Department of Medicine, Stephen E. Livingston, M.D. Minneapolis VA Medical Center Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium University of Minnesota Liver Disease and Hepatitis Program Minneapolis, MN Anchorage, AK Peer Reviewers Robert Gish, M.D. Averell Sherker, M.D. School of Medicine National Institutes of Health, NIDDK University of California, San Diego Bethesda, MD San Diego, CA Donna Sweet, M.D., M.A.C.P. Adelita Gonzales Cantu, Ph.D., R.N. Via Christi Regional Medical Center-St. School of Nursing Francis Campus University of Texas Health Science Center Wichita, KS at San Antonio San Antonio, TX Fasiha Kanwal, M.D. Saint Louis University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO v Treatment for Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Adults Structured Abstract Objectives. This report systematically reviews the comparative benefits and harms of current antiviral treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in treatment-naïve adults. Data sources. MEDLINE® (1947 to August 2012), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (through 3rd quarter 2012), clinical trial registries, and reference lists. Review methods. We used predefined criteria to determine study eligibility. We selected randomized trials of dual therapy with pegylated interferon
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HCV Protease
    HCV Protease HCV NS3-4A serine protease is a complex composed of NS3 and its cofactor NS4A. It harbours serine protease as well as NTPase/RNA helicase activities and is essential for viral polyprotein processing, RNA replication and virion formation. The HCV NS3/4A protease efficiently cleaves and inactivates two important signaling molecules in the sensory pathways that react to HCV pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) to induce interferons (IFNs), i.e., mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (MAVS) and Toll-IL-1 receptor domain-containing adaptor inducing IFN-β (TRIF). HCV infection is associated with chronic liver disease, including hepatic steatosis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The NS3-4A serine protease of HCV has been one of the most attractive targets for developing specific antiviral agents against HCV. www.MedChemExpress.com 1 HCV Protease Inhibitors & Antagonists ACH-806 Asunaprevir (GS9132) Cat. No.: HY-19512 (BMS-650032) Cat. No.: HY-14434 ACH-806 is an NS4A antagonist which can inhibit Asunaprevir (BMS-650032) is a potent and orally Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) replication with an bioavailable hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3 protease EC50 of 14 nM. inhibitor, with IC50 of 0.2 nM-3.5 nM. Asunaprevir inhibits SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro activity. Purity: >98% Purity: 99.74% Clinical Data: No Development Reported Clinical Data: Launched Size: 1 mg, 5 mg Size: 10 mM × 1 mL, 2 mg, 5 mg, 10 mg, 50 mg BI 653048 BI 653048 phosphate Cat. No.: HY-12946 Cat. No.: HY-12946A BI 653048 is a selective and orally active BI 653048 phosphate is a selective and orally nonsteroidal glucocorticoid (GC) agonist active nonsteroidal glucocorticoid with an IC50 value of 55 nM.
    [Show full text]
  • Metagenomic Identification of Diverse Animal Hepaciviruses and Pegiviruses
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.16.100149; this version posted May 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Metagenomic identification of diverse animal hepaciviruses and 2 pegiviruses 3 4 5 Ashleigh F. Porter1, John H.-O. Pettersson1,2, Wei-Shan Chang1, Erin Harvey1, Karrie Rose3, 6 Mang Shi5, John-Sebastian Eden1,4, Jan Buchmann1, Craig Moritz6, Edward C. Holmes1 7 8 9 1. Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, School of Life and 10 Environmental Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, 11 Sydney, Australia. 12 2. Zoonosis Science Center, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Microbiology, 13 Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. 14 3. Australian Registry of Wildlife Health, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, 15 Mosman, Australia. 16 4. Centre for Virus Research, Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, 17 Australia. 18 5. School of Medicine, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China. 19 6. Research School of Biology, and Centre for Biodiversity Analysis, Australian National 20 University, Acton, ACT, Australia. 21 22 23 Address correspondence to: 24 Edward C. Holmes, 25 Marie Bashir Institute for Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, School of Life and 26 Environmental Sciences and School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, 27 Sydney, Australia 28 [email protected] 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.16.100149; this version posted May 17, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct-Acting Antiviral Medications for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection
    Direct-Acting Antiviral Medications for Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection Alison B. Jazwinski, MD, and Andrew J. Muir, MD, MHS Dr. Jazwinski is a Fellow and Dr. Muir Abstract: Treatment of hepatitis C virus has traditionally been diffi- is an Associate Professor in the Division cult because of low rates of treatment success and high rates of treat- of Gastroenterology and Duke Clinical ment discontinuation due to side effects. Current standard therapy Research Institute at Duke University consists of pegylated interferon α and ribavirin, both of which have Medical Center in Durham, North Carolina. nonspecific and largely unknown mechanisms of action. New thera- pies are in development that act directly on the hepatitis C virus at various points in the viral life cycle. Published clinical trial data on these therapies are summarized in this paper. A new era of hepatitis Address correspondence to: C virus treatment is beginning, the ultimate goals of which will be Dr. Andrew J. Muir directly targeting the virus, shortening the length of therapy, improv- P.O. Box 17969 Durham, NC 27715; ing sustained virologic response rates, and minimizing side effects. Tel: 919-668-8557; Fax: 919-668-7164; E-mail: [email protected] epatitis C virus (HCV) is a major public health problem, with an estimated 180 million people infected worldwide. Up to 25% of chronically infected patients eventually Hdevelop cirrhosis and related complications, including hepatocellular carcinoma.1 Chronic liver disease secondary to HCV thus remains the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States.2 The goal of HCV treatment is to eradicate the virus and pre- vent the development of cirrhosis and its complications.
    [Show full text]
  • Origins and Evolution of the Global RNA Virome
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/451740; this version posted October 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Origins and Evolution of the Global RNA Virome 2 Yuri I. Wolfa, Darius Kazlauskasb,c, Jaime Iranzoa, Adriana Lucía-Sanza,d, Jens H. 3 Kuhne, Mart Krupovicc, Valerian V. Doljaf,#, Eugene V. Koonina 4 aNational Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA 5 b Vilniaus universitetas biotechnologijos institutas, Vilnius, Lithuania 6 c Département de Microbiologie, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France 7 dCentro Nacional de Biotecnología, Madrid, Spain 8 eIntegrated Research Facility at Fort Detrick, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 9 Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, Maryland, USA 10 fDepartment of Botany and Plant Pathology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 11 12 #Address correspondence to Valerian V. Dolja, [email protected] 13 14 Running title: Global RNA Virome 15 16 KEYWORDS 17 virus evolution, RNA virome, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, phylogenomics, horizontal 18 virus transfer, virus classification, virus taxonomy 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/451740; this version posted October 24, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 19 ABSTRACT 20 Viruses with RNA genomes dominate the eukaryotic virome, reaching enormous diversity in 21 animals and plants. The recent advances of metaviromics prompted us to perform a detailed 22 phylogenomic reconstruction of the evolution of the dramatically expanded global RNA virome.
    [Show full text]
  • REVIEW Hepatitis C Virus
    DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.12.5917 Hepatitis C Virus -Proteins, Diagnosis, Treatment and New Approaches for Vaccine Development REVIEW Hepatitis C Virus - Proteins, Diagnosis, Treatment and New Approaches for Vaccine Development Hossein Keyvani1, Mehdi Fazlalipour2*, Seyed Hamid Reza Monavari1, Hamid Reza Mollaie2 Abstract Background: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) causes acute and chronic human hepatitis infection and as such is an important global health problem. The virus was discovered in the USA in 1989 and it is now known that three to four million people are infected every year, WHO estimating that 3 percent of the 7 billion people worldwide being chronically infected. Humans are the natural hosts of HCV and this virus can eventually lead to permanent liver damage and carcinoma. HCV is a member of the Flaviviridae family and Hepacivirus genus. The diameter of the virus is about 50-60 nm and the virion contains a single-stranded positive RNA approximately 10,000 nucleotides in length and consisting of one ORF which is encapsulated by an external lipid envelope and icosahedral capsid. HCV is a heterogeneous virus, classified into 6 genotypes and more than 50 subtypes. Because of the genome variability, nucleotide sequences of genotypes differ by approximately 31-34%, and by 20-23% among subtypes. Quasi-species of mixed virus populations provide a survival advantage for the virus to create multiple variant genomes and a high rate of generation of variants to allow rapid selection of mutants for new environmental conditions. Direct contact with infected blood and blood products, sexual relationships and availability of injectable drugs have had remarkable effects on HCV epidemiology.
    [Show full text]
  • Arenaviridae Astroviridae Filoviridae Flaviviridae Hantaviridae
    Hantaviridae 0.7 Filoviridae 0.6 Picornaviridae 0.3 Wenling red spikefish hantavirus Rhinovirus C Ahab virus * Possum enterovirus * Aronnax virus * * Wenling minipizza batfish hantavirus Wenling filefish filovirus Norway rat hunnivirus * Wenling yellow goosefish hantavirus Starbuck virus * * Porcine teschovirus European mole nova virus Human Marburg marburgvirus Mosavirus Asturias virus * * * Tortoise picornavirus Egyptian fruit bat Marburg marburgvirus Banded bullfrog picornavirus * Spanish mole uluguru virus Human Sudan ebolavirus * Black spectacled toad picornavirus * Kilimanjaro virus * * * Crab-eating macaque reston ebolavirus Equine rhinitis A virus Imjin virus * Foot and mouth disease virus Dode virus * Angolan free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * * Human cosavirus E Seoul orthohantavirus Little free-tailed bat bombali ebolavirus * African bat icavirus A Tigray hantavirus Human Zaire ebolavirus * Saffold virus * Human choclo virus *Little collared fruit bat ebolavirus Peleg virus * Eastern red scorpionfish picornavirus * Reed vole hantavirus Human bundibugyo ebolavirus * * Isla vista hantavirus * Seal picornavirus Human Tai forest ebolavirus Chicken orivirus Paramyxoviridae 0.4 * Duck picornavirus Hepadnaviridae 0.4 Bildad virus Ned virus Tiger rockfish hepatitis B virus Western African lungfish picornavirus * Pacific spadenose shark paramyxovirus * European eel hepatitis B virus Bluegill picornavirus Nemo virus * Carp picornavirus * African cichlid hepatitis B virus Triplecross lizardfish paramyxovirus * * Fathead minnow picornavirus
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put up Or Shut Up
    viruses Review Hepatitis C Virus Vaccine Research: Time to Put Up or Shut Up Alex S. Hartlage 1,2 and Amit Kapoor 1,3,* 1 Center for Vaccines and Immunity, Abigail Wexner Research Institute at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA; [email protected] 2 Medical Scientist Training Program, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA 3 Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43205, USA * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Unless urgently needed to prevent a pandemic, the development of a viral vaccine should follow a rigorous scientific approach. Each vaccine candidate should be designed considering the in- depth knowledge of protective immunity, followed by preclinical studies to assess immunogenicity and safety, and lastly, the evaluation of selected vaccines in human clinical trials. The recently concluded first phase II clinical trial of a human hepatitis C virus (HCV) vaccine followed this approach. Still, despite promising preclinical results, it failed to protect against chronic infection, raising grave concerns about our understanding of protective immunity. This setback, combined with the lack of HCV animal models and availability of new highly effective antivirals, has fueled ongoing discussions of using a controlled human infection model (CHIM) to test new HCV vaccine candidates. Before taking on such an approach, however, we must carefully weigh all the ethical and health consequences of human infection in the absence of a complete understanding of HCV immunity and pathogenesis. We know that there are significant gaps in our knowledge of adaptive immunity necessary to prevent chronic HCV infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Ribavirin Inhibits West Nile Virus Replication and Cytopathic Effect in Neural Cells
    1214 CONCISE COMMUNICATION Ribavirin Inhibits West Nile Virus Replication and Cytopathic Effect in Neural Cells Ingo Jordan,1 Thomas Briese,1 Nicole Fischer,1 1Emerging Diseases Laboratory, Departments of Microbiology Johnson Yiu-Nam Lau,2 and W. Ian Lipkin1 and Molecular Genetics, Neurology, and Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, and 2ICN Pharmaceuticals, Costa Mesa, California West Nile virus (WNV) is an emerging mosquito-borne pathogen that was reported for the ®rst time in the Western hemisphere in August 1999, when an encephalitis outbreak in New York City resulted in 62 clinical cases and 7 deaths. WNV, for which no antiviral therapy has been described, was recently recovered from a pool of mosquitoes collected in New York City. In anticipation of the recurrence of WNV during the summer of 2000, an analysis was made of the ef®cacy of the nucleoside analogue ribavirin, a broad-spectrum antiviral compound with activity against several RNA viruses, for treatment of WNV infection. High doses of ribavirin were found to inhibit WNV replication and cytopathogenicity in human neural cells in vitro. The Flaviviridae, a family of enveloped positive-strand RNA substantial [3]. Genetic analysis of the envelope protein se- viruses, include West Nile virus (WNV), as well as other sig- quence indicated that the viral strain most closely resembled ni®cant human pathogens, such as hepatitis C, yellow fever, an isolate from a goose in Israel in 1998, demonstrating the dengue, Japanese encephalitis, and St. Louis encephalitis vi- wide geographic distribution of this emerging pathogen [4, 5]. ruses [1]. Whereas hepatitis C virus (genus Hepacivirus) may Antiviral therapy for hepatitis C has been described [6]; how- be transmitted by blood products or sexual activity, most mem- ever, no speci®c treatment has been reported for WNV or other bers of the Flavivirus genus, including WNV, are transmitted ¯avivirus infections.
    [Show full text]
  • PI Narlaprevir in Russian Patients with Genotype 1 Chronic Hepatitis C
    The «second wave» PI Narlaprevir in Russian patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C Professor Igor Bakulin Moscow Clinical Scientific Center June 5, 2015 Key points Background Narlaprevir in clinical trials Interim results of Phase III Russian PIONEER study Conclusions 11.06.2015 2 HCV Epidemiology in Russia Total population size1 143 000 000 Anti-HCV Ab-positive1 5 861 000 CHC diagnosed (viremic)1 1 789 500 New cases2 55 900/year AVT3 5 500*/year AVT – antiviral therapy; CHC – chronic hepatitis C 1 2010 data, Saraswat V, Norris S, et al. J Viral Hepat. 2015 ;22 Suppl 1:6-25; 2 Yuschuk ND, Znoyko OO, et al. Epidemiol Vaccine Prevent. 2013; 3 11.06.2015 Regional registries data, 2011 in Saraswat V, Norris S, et al. J Viral Hepat. 2015 ;22 Suppl3 1:6-25 *8 000/year according to IMS Health data calculated on the basis of PegIFN sales for all genotypes in 2014 Access to Direct Acting Antivirals in 2015 SMV SOF SMV No access to PR federal budget SOF SOF LDV Access to new DAA in DCV Russia and some other European countries is limited 3D/r EASL Monothematic Conference on “Liver Disease in Resource Limited Settings”, 2015 11.06.2015 4 EASL Recommendations 2015 IFN-free regimens Genotype Sofosbuvir + RBV 2, 3 Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (+/- RBV) 1, 4, 5, 6 Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir + Dasabuvir (+/- RBV) 1 Sofosbuvir + Simeprevir (+/- RBV) 1, 4 Sofosbuvir + Daclatasvir (+/- RBV) All Ombitasvir/Paritaprevir/Ritonavir (+/- RBV) 4 For countries with limited resources IFN-containing regimens are still relevant PegIFN-α + RBV + Sofosbuvir All PegIFN-α + RBV + Simeprevir 1, 4 11.06.2015 5 HCV Protease Inhibitors Value in Russia Protease inhibitors - a promising DAA group for the treatment of HCV 1b GT, the most prevalent genotype in Russia HCV Genotypes Protease inhibitors Asunaprevir Boceprevir Narlaprevir/r Paritaprevir/r Simeprevir Saraswat V, Norris S, de Knegt RJ, et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Conventional and Unconventional Mechanisms for Capping Viral Mrna
    REVIEWS Conventional and unconventional mechanisms for capping viral mRNA Etienne Decroly1, François Ferron1, Julien Lescar1,2 and Bruno Canard1 Abstract | In the eukaryotic cell, capping of mRNA 5′ ends is an essential structural modification that allows efficient mRNA translation, directs pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA export from the nucleus, limits mRNA degradation by cellular 5′–3′ exonucleases and allows recognition of foreign RNAs (including viral transcripts) as ‘non-self’. However, viruses have evolved mechanisms to protect their RNA 5′ ends with either a covalently attached peptide or a cap moiety (7‑methyl-Gppp, in which p is a phosphate group) that is indistinguishable from cellular mRNA cap structures. Viral RNA caps can be stolen from cellular mRNAs or synthesized using either a host- or virus-encoded capping apparatus, and these capping assemblies exhibit a wide diversity in organization, structure and mechanism. Here, we review the strategies used by viruses of eukaryotic cells to produce functional mRNA 5′-caps and escape innate immunity. Pre-mRNA splicing The cap structure found at the 5′ end of eukaryotic reactions involved in the viral RNA-capping process, A post-transcriptional mRNAs consists of a 7‑methylguanosine (m7G) moi‑ and the specific cellular factors that trigger a response modification of pre-mRNA, in ety linked to the first nucleotide of the transcript via a from the innate immune system. which introns are excised and 5′–5′ triphosphate bridge1 (FIG. 1a). The cap has several exons are joined in order to form a translationally important biological roles, such as protecting mRNA Capping, decapping and turnover of host RNA functional, mature mRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Hepatitis C Virus Drugs Simeprevir and Grazoprevir Synergize With
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.13.422511; this version posted December 14, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Hepatitis C Virus Drugs Simeprevir and Grazoprevir Synergize with 2 Remdesivir to Suppress SARS-CoV-2 Replication in Cell Culture 3 Khushboo Bafna1,#, Kris White2,#, Balasubramanian Harish3, Romel Rosales2, 4 Theresa A. Ramelot1, Thomas B. Acton1, Elena Moreno2, Thomas Kehrer2, 5 Lisa Miorin2, Catherine A. Royer3, Adolfo García-Sastre2,4,5,*, 6 Robert M. Krug6,*, and Gaetano T. Montelione1,* 7 1Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, and Center for Biotechnology and 8 Interdisciplinary Sciences, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, 12180 9 USA. 10 11 2Department of Microbiology, and Global Health and Emerging Pathogens Institute, 12 Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY10029, USA. 13 14 3Department of Biology, and Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Sciences, 15 Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, 12180 USA. 16 17 4Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Icahn School of Medicine at 18 Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA. 19 20 5The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 21 10029, USA 22 23 6Department of Molecular Biosciences, John Ring LaMontagne Center for Infectious 24 Disease, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Texas at Austin, 25
    [Show full text]
  • Structure Unveils Relationships Between RNA Virus Polymerases
    viruses Article Structure Unveils Relationships between RNA Virus Polymerases Heli A. M. Mönttinen † , Janne J. Ravantti * and Minna M. Poranen * Molecular and Integrative Biosciences Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Viikki Biocenter 1, P.O. Box 56 (Viikinkaari 9), 00014 Helsinki, Finland; heli.monttinen@helsinki.fi * Correspondence: janne.ravantti@helsinki.fi (J.J.R.); minna.poranen@helsinki.fi (M.M.P.); Tel.: +358-2941-59110 (M.M.P.) † Present address: Institute of Biotechnology, Helsinki Institute of Life Sciences (HiLIFE), University of Helsinki, Viikki Biocenter 2, P.O. Box 56 (Viikinkaari 5), 00014 Helsinki, Finland. Abstract: RNA viruses are the fastest evolving known biological entities. Consequently, the sequence similarity between homologous viral proteins disappears quickly, limiting the usability of traditional sequence-based phylogenetic methods in the reconstruction of relationships and evolutionary history among RNA viruses. Protein structures, however, typically evolve more slowly than sequences, and structural similarity can still be evident, when no sequence similarity can be detected. Here, we used an automated structural comparison method, homologous structure finder, for comprehensive comparisons of viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (RdRps). We identified a common structural core of 231 residues for all the structurally characterized viral RdRps, covering segmented and non-segmented negative-sense, positive-sense, and double-stranded RNA viruses infecting both prokaryotic and eukaryotic hosts. The grouping and branching of the viral RdRps in the structure- based phylogenetic tree follow their functional differentiation. The RdRps using protein primer, RNA primer, or self-priming mechanisms have evolved independently of each other, and the RdRps cluster into two large branches based on the used transcription mechanism.
    [Show full text]