DOCSLIB.ORG

Political Parties Poster

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Political Parties Poster In 1896, William Jennings Bryan’s supporters took conrol of the national Democratic Party. Bryan argued that farmers and workers would be crucied on a “cross of gold” by conservative bankers and businessmen who insisted on a tight money supply. He lost the election, but the Democratic Party increasingly backed his populist principles. As Democrats began to take up Populist The Greenback Party supported government issue of paper The Populists opposed the gold standard and supported a causes, the Populist Party lost inuence. money to help farmers and businesses. By 1884, it also freer money supply. More generally, they advocated for In 1900 they ran a “Fusion” ticket, In the 1850s, Democrats adopted some Whig advocated an income tax, the eight-hour work day, and supporting the Democratic nominee for By 1828, supporters of Andrew Jackson had begun farmers and industrial workers and a stronger government positions, such as support for railroads. Northern women’s right to vote. The party quickly lost support. president, William Jennings Bryan. calling themselves Democrats. They wanted small The Free Soil Party opposed the expansion of slavery The Democrats, nally split over slavery, could to work for their interests rather than those of the parties. into the western territories — a popular issue in the and southern Democrats also agreed that slavery The election of 1800 was a government, and they opposed trade protection, In 1854, Whigs and Free-Soilers joined forces to not agree on a candidate in 1860. Northern and In 1872, Republicans calling for an end to wake of the Mexican War (1846–48). Running on the should be permitted in the western territories. As critical moment in American national banks, and paper money. Supporters of create the Republican Party. Republicans opposed Southern Democrats ran separate candidates, Reconstruction split and ran Horace Greeley for Peter Cooper James Baird Weaver Benjamin Franklin Butler The Liberty Party was organized in the 1840s slogan “Free Soil, Free Speech, Free Labor and Free a result, by 1856, the Democrats were nearly the democracy — the rst peaceful The Democratic-Republicans gradually John Quincy Adams, calling themselves National the expansion of slavery and adopted a progressive and their division allowed the Republicans to president on the Liberal Republican ticket. to advocate for the abolition of slavery. It had Men,” they elected several men to Congress. only party in the South. After the Constitution was ratied, exchange of power between adopted Federalist programs, including Republicans, wanted a strong central government platform, supporting railroads, the growth of cities, capture the White House. Democrats also nominated Greeley. little success but was an important forerunner GREENBACK James Weaver Wharton Barker there were no political parties. two parties. support for manufacturing and commerce that would support internal improvements and education, and homesteads for farmers. George Washington was elected and a stronger central government. promote commerce. to other anti-slavery eorts. without opposition. John C. Breckenridge SOUTHERN DEMOCRATIC POPULIST Andrew Jackson Thomas Jeerson Thomas Jeerson Thomas Jeerson James Madison James Madison James Monroe Andrew Jackson Andrew Jackson Martin Van Buren Martin Van Buren James Polk Lewis Cass Franklin Pierce James Buchanan Horatio Seymour Samuel J. Tilden Wineld Scott Hancock Grover Cleveland Grover Cleveland Grover Cleveland William Jennings Bryan William Jennings Bryan James Monroe Stephen Douglas George B. McClellan DEMOCRATIC Horace Greeley DEMOCRATIC DEMOCRATIC-REPUBLICAN James Bierney James Bierney NORTHERN DEMOCRATIC John McCauley Palmer NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC John Bell William Crawford John P. Hale LIBERTY CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERAL George Washington George Washington Henry Clay UNION REPUBLICAN Willie Person Magnum Martin Van Buren FREE SOIL REPUBLICAN FEDERALIST NATIONAL REPUBLICAN WHIG Daniel Webster John C. Fremont Abraham Lincoln Abraham Lincoln Ulysses S. Grant Ulysses S. Grant Rutherford B. Hayes James Gareld James Blaine Benjamin Harrison Benjamin Harrison William McKinley William McKinley John Adams John Adams Charles Pinkney Charles Pinkney DeWitt Clinton Rufus King Henry Clay William Henry Harrison Zachary Taylor Wineld Scott Henry Clay PROHIBITION By 1820, the Federalists could no John Quincy Adams John Quincy Adams A few remaining Whigs and Know-Nothings longer eld a presidential candidate. Hugh Lawson White ran John Bell on the Constitutional Union In 1876, election results in three southern states were contested. Congressional Democrats agreed to let Hayes have During the 1790s, two parties began to form around dierences of opinion James Monroe won re-election William Wirt ticket in 1860, advocating simply to keep the John Pierce St. John Clinton Bowen Fisk John Bidwell Joshua Levering John Granville Wooley without opposition, and the “Era of In 1824, four men ran for president, all calling themselves Union as it was. the Presidency in exchange for an end to Reconstruction. within Washington’s cabinet. Federalists, behind Secretary of the Treasury Federalists opposed the War of 1812, and ANTI-MASONIC Millard Fillmore Good Feelings” began. Democratic-Republicans. Andrew Jackson won the most William Henry Harrison KNOW-NOTHING AMERICAN Alexander Hamilton, supported a strong central government that could the American victory cost them support. The Prohibition Party organized around a single In 1896, Republicans led by William McKinley argued that Bryan’s liberal votes, but no candidate won a majority of the electoral In the 1880s, Republicans “waved the bloody By the mid-1890s, the Democrats’ northern promote manufacturing and commerce. Supporters of Secretary of State By 1836, opponents of Jackson’s Democrats had issue: the banning of alcoholic beverages. They economic policies would make everyone poor. McKinley also reassured vote. The election went to the House of Representatives, In New York and New England, opposition to shirt,” gaining support by reminding northern coalition of farmers, immigrants, and Thomas Jeerson, who began to call themselves Democratic-Republicans, organized into the Whig Party. They opposed what Divided over the issue of slavery, the Whig party split received a small percentage of the vote in each immigrants, especially Germans, that he welcomed them as Americans. His which chose John Quincy Adams. Jackson organized the Anti-Masonic Party, The “Know-Nothing” Party organized in opposition to immigration, especially voters that they had won the Civil War. businessmen was breaking up. In the believed in small central government and an agricultural society. they saw as Jackson’s autocratic rule, and they in the 1850s. Most Northern Whigs joined the new election until 1920. campaign manager, Mark Hanna, raised millions of dollars and used new which feared the role of Freemasons in of Catholics. At rst they worked in secret, and when asked about their Congressional elections of 1894, Republicans supported social, economic, and moral reforms. In Republican Party, while many Southern Whigs techniques of advertising. The result was a Republican landslide. The new government. In 1832, they held the rst activities, they replied “I know nothing.” In the 1850s, they renamed nearly swept the northern states. 1836, they ran four regional candidates, hoping to became Democrats. The remaining Whigs ran former Republican coalition would dominate national politics for another 36 years. presidential nominating convention in the U.S. themselves the American Party, and in 1856, with the Whig Party breaking up, split the electoral vote and throw the election to the president Millard Fillmore on a joint ticket with the they ran Millard Fillmore for president. House of Representatives, where the Whig majority American Party in 1856. would pick a president. But their strategy failed. 1788 1792 1796 1804 1808 1812 1816 1824 1828 1832 1836 1844 1848 1852 1856 1864 1868 1872 1876 1884 1888 1892 1896 1790 1800 1810 1820 1830 1840 1850 1860 1870 1880 1890 1900 FIRST PARTY SYSTEM (1792–1820) SECOND PARTY SYSTEM (1828–1854) THIRD PARTY SYSTEM (1854–1896) The first party system began with divisions in Washington’s cabinet between Secretary Democratic-Republicans gradually came to support a stronger government and The second party system emerged from a split within the Democratic- tion and railroads, draining Whig support. The issue of slavery and its expansion The third party system emerged from divisions over slavery. The two major coalitions of people with diverse interests. of the Treasury Alexander Hamilton and Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton “internal improvements,” such as roads and canals, that would help commerce. As Republican Party. The two main factions were led by Andrew Jackson, hero of into the western territories territories finally split the Whigs in the early 1850s. parties of the 1850s continued to dominate American politics after the Civil War. At the national level, both parties were largely controlled by business interests in supporters, who had strongly favored adopting the Federal Constitution, continued to belief in broad-based democracy spread, support for Federalists eroded. After the War the War of 1812 and Indian wars, and Henry Clay, Speaker of the House of They are the same parties still in existence today, but their issues, beliefs, and For the first time, most voters identified strongly with one party or another. The the 1880s and 1890s. During economic downturns,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ideological Foundation of the People's Party of Texas Gavin Gray
    1 The Ideological Foundation of the People’s Party of Texas Gavin Gray 2 Short lived insurgent third parties are a common feature in American political history, though few were as impactful as the nineteenth century People’s Party.1 Although the People’s Party itself faded out of existence after a few decades, the Republican and Democratic Parties eventually adopted much of their platform.2 In recent history Ross Perot and Donald Trump's appeals to economic nationalism is reminiscent of the old Populist platform. Since its inception, the ideological foundation of the People's Party has remained a point of contention among historians. Traditional historiography on the People's Party, which included figures such as Frederick Jackson Turner and Richard Hofstadter, described it as a conservative movement rooted in agrarian Jacksonianism. In 1931 John Hicks' The Populist Revolt presented the new ​ ​ perspective that the People's Party, far from being conservative, was the precursor to the twentieth century Progressive movement. For the purpose of this study I focused exclusively on the ideological foundation of the People’s Party as it existed within the state of Texas. The study focused exclusively on the People’s Party within Texas for two reasons. The first reason is because the People’s Party organized itself on a statewide basis. The nationwide People’s Party operated as a confederation, each state party had its own independent structure and organizational history, therefore each state party itself must be studied independently.3 The second reason is because one of the People’s Party’s immediate predecessors, the Southern Farmers’ Alliance, had its roots in Texas.4 If one is attempting to study the origins of the People’s Party, then one must examine it where its roots are oldest.
    [Show full text]
  • Efforts to Establish a Labor Party I!7 America
    Efforts to establish a labor party in America Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors O'Brien, Dorothy Margaret, 1917- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 01/10/2021 15:33:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/553636 EFFORTS TO ESTABLISH A LABOR PARTY I!7 AMERICA by Dorothy SU 0s Brlen A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of Economics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Graduate College University of Arizona 1943 Approved 3T-:- ' t .A\% . :.y- wissife mk- j" •:-i .»,- , g r ■ •: : # ■ s &???/ S 9^ 3 PREFACE The labor movement In America has followed two courses, one, economic unionism, the other, political activity* Union­ ism preceded labor parties by a few years, but developed dif­ ferently from political parties* Unionism became crystallized in the American Federation of Labor, the Railway Brotherhoods and the Congress of Industrial Organization* The membership of these unions has fluctuated with the changes in economic conditions, but in the long run they have grown and increased their strength* Political parties have only arisen when there was drastic need for a change* Labor would rally around lead­ ers, regardless of their party aflliations,
    [Show full text]
  • Picking the Vice President
    Picking the Vice President Elaine C. Kamarck Brookings Institution Press Washington, D.C. Contents Introduction 4 1 The Balancing Model 6 The Vice Presidency as an “Arranged Marriage” 2 Breaking the Mold 14 From Arranged Marriages to Love Matches 3 The Partnership Model in Action 20 Al Gore Dick Cheney Joe Biden 4 Conclusion 33 Copyright 36 Introduction Throughout history, the vice president has been a pretty forlorn character, not unlike the fictional vice president Julia Louis-Dreyfus plays in the HBO seriesVEEP . In the first episode, Vice President Selina Meyer keeps asking her secretary whether the president has called. He hasn’t. She then walks into a U.S. senator’s office and asks of her old colleague, “What have I been missing here?” Without looking up from her computer, the senator responds, “Power.” Until recently, vice presidents were not very interesting nor was the relationship between presidents and their vice presidents very consequential—and for good reason. Historically, vice presidents have been understudies, have often been disliked or even despised by the president they served, and have been used by political parties, derided by journalists, and ridiculed by the public. The job of vice president has been so peripheral that VPs themselves have even made fun of the office. That’s because from the beginning of the nineteenth century until the last decade of the twentieth century, most vice presidents were chosen to “balance” the ticket. The balance in question could be geographic—a northern presidential candidate like John F. Kennedy of Massachusetts picked a southerner like Lyndon B.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyncote, Pennsylvania: the History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1985 Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb Doreen L. Foust University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Foust, Doreen L., "Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb" (1985). Theses (Historic Preservation). 239. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/239 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Foust, Doreen L. (1985). Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/239 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and Preservation of a Victorian Philadelphia Suburb Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Foust, Doreen L. (1985). Wyncote, Pennsylvania: The History, Development, Architecture and
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court of the United States
    No. 19-524 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ROQUE DE LA FUENTE, AKA ROCKY, Petitioner, v. AlEX PADIllA, CALIFOrnIA SECRETARY OF STATE, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR A WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CouRT OF AppEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRcuIT BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE PROFESSORS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND HISTORY IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER ALICia I. DEARN, ESQ. Counsel of Record 231 South Bemiston Avenue, Suite 850 Clayton, MO 63105 (314) 526-0040 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae 292830 A (800) 274-3321 • (800) 359-6859 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................i TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES .............. ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ..................1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................6 ARGUMENT....................................7 I. CERTIORARI IS DESIRABLE BECAUSE THERE IS CONFUSION AMONG LOWER COURTS OVER WHETHER THE APPLY THE USAGE TEST ...........7 II. THE NINTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY STATED THAT BECAUSE MINOR PARTY PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES HAVE APPEARED ON THE CALIFORNIA BALLOT, THEREFORE IT IS NOT SIGNIFICANT THAT NO INDEPENDENT PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE HAS QUALIFIED SINCE 1992 ..............................15 CONCLUSION .................................20 ii TABLE OF CITED AUTHORITIES Page CASES: American Party v. Jernigan, 424 F.Supp. 943 (e.d. Ark. 1977)..................8 Arutunoff v. Oklahoma State Election Board, 687 F.2d 1375 (1982)...........................14 Bergland v. Harris, 767 F.2d 1551 (1985) ..........................8-9 Bradley v Mandel, 449 F. Supp. 983 (1978) ........................10 Citizens to Establish a Reform Party in Arkansas v. Priest, 970 F. Supp. 690 (e.d. Ark. 1996) .................8 Coffield v. Kemp, 599 F.3d 1276 (2010) ...........................12 Cowen v. Raffensperger, 1:17cv-4660 ..................................12 Dart v.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Black History and the Class Struggle
    ®~759.C A Spartacist Pamphlet $1 Black History i! and the Class Struggle No. 18 Page 24 ~iI~i~·:~:f!!iI'!lIiAI_!Ii!~1_&i 1·li:~'I!l~~.I_ :lIl1!tl!llti:'1!):~"1i:'S:':I'!mf\i,ri£~; : MINt mm:!~~!!)rI!t!!i\i!Ui\}_~ How the Liberals and Reformists Derailed the Struggle for Integration For Black Liberation Through Socialist Revolution! Page 6 VVorkers protest manager's use of "N" word and fight for union recognition, demanding: "Stop the Plantation Mentality," University of Virginia at Charlottesville, , 21 November 2003. I '0 ;, • ,:;. i"'l' \'~ ,1,';; !r.!1 I I -- - 2 Introduction Mumia Abu-Jamal is a fighter for the dom chronicles Mumia's political devel­ Cole's article on racism and anti-woman oppressed whose words teach powerful opment and years with the Black Panther bigotry, "For Free Abortion on Demand!" lessons and rouse opposition to the injus­ Party, as well as the Spartacist League's It was Democrat Clinton who put an "end tices of American capitalism. That's why active role in vying to win the best ele­ to welfare as we know it." the government seeks to silence him for­ ments of that generation from black Nearly 150 years since the Civil War ever with the barbaric death penaIty-a nationalism to revolutionary Marxism. crushed the slave system and won the legacy of slavery-,-Qr entombment for life One indication of the rollback of black franchise for black people, a whopping 13 for a crime he did not commit. The frame­ rights and the absence of militant black percent of black men were barred from up of Mumia Abu-Jamal represents the leadership is the ubiquitous use of the voting in the 2004 presidential election government's fear of the possibility of "N" word today.
    [Show full text]
  • The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860
    PRESERVING THE WHITE MAN’S REPUBLIC: THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN CONSERVATISM, 1847-1860 Joshua A. Lynn A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2015 Approved by: Harry L. Watson William L. Barney Laura F. Edwards Joseph T. Glatthaar Michael Lienesch © 2015 Joshua A. Lynn ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Joshua A. Lynn: Preserving the White Man’s Republic: The Democratic Party and the Transformation of American Conservatism, 1847-1860 (Under the direction of Harry L. Watson) In the late 1840s and 1850s, the American Democratic party redefined itself as “conservative.” Yet Democrats’ preexisting dedication to majoritarian democracy, liberal individualism, and white supremacy had not changed. Democrats believed that “fanatical” reformers, who opposed slavery and advanced the rights of African Americans and women, imperiled the white man’s republic they had crafted in the early 1800s. There were no more abstract notions of freedom to boundlessly unfold; there was only the existing liberty of white men to conserve. Democrats therefore recast democracy, previously a progressive means to expand rights, as a way for local majorities to police racial and gender boundaries. In the process, they reinvigorated American conservatism by placing it on a foundation of majoritarian democracy. Empowering white men to democratically govern all other Americans, Democrats contended, would preserve their prerogatives. With the policy of “popular sovereignty,” for instance, Democrats left slavery’s expansion to territorial settlers’ democratic decision-making.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by CLP Research 1600 1700 1750
    Copyright by CLP Research Partial Genealogy of the Barkers Robert Barker I Main Political Affiliation: (1580-1618) (of Pennsylvania & Massachusetts) (of Kent, England) 1763-83 Whig/Revolutionary = Catherine Ackworth 1789-1823 Federalist (1584-1616) 1824-33 National Republican 1834-53 Whig 1600 John Barker I 1 Son Robert Barker II 1854- Republican & Populist (1610-52)); (Quaker) (1616-91); (Quaker); (carpenter/saw & grist mills) (Emigrated from Kent, (Emigrated from Kent, England to Plymouth Colony); (Duxbury, Plymouth official) England to Plymouth Colony) = Lucy Williams (1620-81) SEE BARKER OF MA GENEALOGY 4 Others Isaac Barker (1640-1710?) (possibly killed by Indians in 1689) 1650 = Judith Prence (1645?-at least 1691) 10 Others Samuel Barker (1667-1739) Deborah Wing = = Bethia Folger (1686-1711) (1692-1774) See Folger of NY Genealogy 1700 1 Daughter Robert Barker 2 Others Josiah Barker (1723-80); (Quaker) (1728-1803) Jedidah Chase = = Sarah Folger (1723-62) (1739-1833) SEE BARKER OF MA GENEALOGY SEE BARKER OF MA GENEALOGY See Folger of MA FOR THE OFFSPRING OF Genealogy ROBERT BARKER & JEDIDAH CHASE 1750 Jacob Barker 5 Others (1779-1871) (born Nantucket Island, Nantucket co. MA);(cousin of Benjamin Franklin through mother); (moved to New York, 1795) (merchant/ship-owner/banker/lawyer); (joined Tammany Hall political organization) (banker; arranged $5 million loan to US Government in 1814 for War of 1812; however, bankrupted by British attacks on his ships) (founded Exchange Bank of NY, 1815); (helped found Life & Fire Insurance Co.;
    [Show full text]
  • OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS
    OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 OFFICIAL 2016 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/08/2016 Source: State Elections Offices* SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE ELECTORAL ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR ELECTORAL VOTES CAST FOR VOTES JOSEPH R. BIDEN (D) DONALD J. TRUMP (R) AL 9 9 AK 3 3 AZ 11 11 AR 6 6 CA 55 55 CO 9 9 CT 7 7 DE 3 3 DC 3 3 FL 29 29 GA 16 16 HI 4 4 ID 4 4 IL 20 20 IN 11 11 IA 6 6 KS 6 6 KY 8 8 LA 8 8 ME 4 3 1 MD 10 10 MA 11 11 MI 16 16 MN 10 10 MS 6 6 MO 10 10 MT 3 3 NE 5 1 4 NV 6 6 NH 4 4 NJ 14 14 NM 5 5 NY 29 29 NC 15 15 ND 3 3 OH 18 18 OK 7 7 OR 7 7 PA 20 20 RI 4 4 SC 9 9 SD 3 3 TN 11 11 TX 38 38 UT 6 6 VT 3 3 VA 13 13 WA 12 12 WV 5 5 WI 10 10 WY 3 3 Total: 538 306 232 Total Electoral Votes Needed to Win = 270 - Page 1 of 12 - OFFICIAL 2020 PRESIDENTIAL GENERAL ELECTION RESULTS General Election Date: 11/03/2020 SOURCE: State Elections Offices* STATE BIDEN BLANKENSHIP BODDIE CARROLL CHARLES AL 849,624 AK 153,778 1,127 AZ 1,672,143 13 AR 423,932 2,108 1,713 CA 11,110,250 2,605 559 CO 1,804,352 5,061 2,515 2,011 CT 1,080,831 219 11 DE 296,268 1 87 8 DC 317,323 FL 5,297,045 3,902 854 GA 2,473,633 61 8 701 65 HI 366,130 931 ID 287,021 1,886 163 IL 3,471,915 18 9,548 75 IN 1,242,416 895 IA 759,061 1,707 KS 570,323 KY 772,474 7 408 43 LA 856,034 860 1,125 2,497 ME 435,072 MD 1,985,023 4 795 30 MA 2,382,202 MI 2,804,040 7,235 963 MN 1,717,077 75 1,037 112 MS 539,398 1,279 1,161 MO 1,253,014 3,919 664 MT 244,786 23 NE 374,583 NV 703,486 3,138 NH 424,937
    [Show full text]
  • The Road to Election and Initial Impact of FDR Kiana Frederick Leading up to the Election of 1932
    The Road to Election and Initial Impact of FDR Kiana Frederick Leading Up to the Election of 1932 ● FDR’s main campaign strategy was to focus the public’s attention on Hoover’s inadequacies and the Nation’s troubles. ● His strategy allowed for him to put down Hoover while promising better days ahead if he was president. ● This promise was NOT backed up with any specific policies or programs that he would change or create. Lead up to the Election of 1932 ● Herbert Hoover was the president prior to the election of 1932 ● Prior to the election, five thousand banks had failed, and by the end of 1932, one third of the nation’s workforce was unemployed. ● Farm income had declined from 12 million dollars in 1929 to 5 million dollars by the end of 1932. ● Herbert Hoover’s popularity decreased significantly because of his inability to reverse the economic collapse. Map of the Election of 1932 The Election of 1932 ● Democrats had only elected one president since 1896 ● Franklin D. Roosevelt v.s Herbert Hoover ● FDR would be a shoo-in for the election ● FDR would promise a “New Deal” for the American people ● The election marked the end of the “Fourth Party System” and would commence the “Fifth Party System” Fourth Party System and Fifth Party System The Fourth party System marks the period in political history that was dominated by the republican party, also known as the “Progressive Era.” The Great Depression served as the springboard. The election in 1932 would be a realigning election giving way to the Fifth Party System.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Jackson
    THE JACKSONIAN ERA DEMOCRATS AND WHIGS: THE SECOND PARTY SYSTEM THE “ERA OF GOOD FEELINGS” • James Monroe (1817-1825) was the last Founder to serve as President • Federalist party had been discredited after War of 1812 • Monroe unopposed for reelection in 1820 • Foreign policy triumphs: • Adams-Onís Treaty (1819) settled boundary with Mexico & added Florida • Monroe Doctrine warned Europeans against further colonization in Americas James Monroe, By Gilbert Stuart THE ELECTION OF 1824 & THE SPLIT OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY • “Era of Good Feelings” collapsed under weight of sectional & economic differences • New generation of politicians • Election of 1824 saw Republican party split into factions • Andrew Jackson received plurality of popular & electoral vote • House of Representatives chose John Quincy Adams to be president • Henry Clay became Secretary of State – accused of “corrupt bargain” • John Quincy Adams’ Inaugural Address called in vain for return to unity THE NATIONAL REPUBLICANS (WHIGS) • The leaders: • Henry Clay • John Quincy Adams • Daniel Webster • The followers: • Middle class Henry Clay • Educated • Evangelical • Native-born • Market-oriented John Quincy Adams WHIG ISSUES • Conscience Whigs – abolition, temperance, women’s rights, etc. • Cotton Whigs – internal improvements & protective tariffs to foster economic growth (the “American System”) THE DEMOCRATIC REPUBLICANS (DEMOCRATS) • The leaders: • Martin Van Buren • Andrew Jackson • John C. Calhoun • The followers: Martin Van Buren • Northern working class & Southern planter aristocracy • Not well-educated • Confessional churches • Immigrants • Locally-oriented John C. Calhoun DEMOCRATIC ISSUES • Limited power for federal government & states’ rights • Opposition to “corrupt” alliance between government & business • Individual freedom from coercion “KING ANDREW” & THE “MONSTER BANK” • Marshall’s decision in McCulloch v.
    [Show full text]