Iglesia Ni Cristo Beliefs Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Republic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila EN BANC
Republic of the Philippines Nos. 116, 119, 121 and 128. The Board classified the There are some inconsistencies in SUPREME COURT series as "X" or not for public viewing on the ground the particular program as it is very Manila that they "offend and constitute an attack against surprising for this program to show other religions which is expressly prohibited by law." series of Catholic ceremonies and EN BANC also some religious sects and using Petitioner pursued two (2) courses of action against it in their discussion about the the respondent Board. On November 28, 1992, it bible. There are remarks which are appealed to the Office of the President the direct criticism which affect other G.R. No. 119673 July 26, 1996 classification of its TV Series No. 128. It succeeded religions. in its appeal for on December 18, 1992, the Office of IGLESIA NI CRISTO, (INC.), petitioner, the President reversed the decision of the respondent Need more opinions for this vs. Board. Forthwith, the Board allowed Series No. 128 particular program. Please subject THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEALS, to be publicly telecast. to more opinions. BOARD OF REVIEW FOR MOVING PICTURES AND TELEVISION and On December 14, 1992, petitioner also filed against (2) Exhibit "A-1," respondent HONORABLE HENRIETTA S. the respondent Board Civil Case No. Q-92-14280, Board's Voting Slip for Television MENDOZA, respondents. with the RTC, NCR Quezon City. 1 Petitioner alleged showing its September 11, 1992 that the respondent Board acted without jurisdiction subsequent action on petitioner's 3 or with grave abuse of discretion in requiring Series No. -
Upreme
l\epublic of tbe ~btltpptnes $upreme <!Court ;fffilantla EN BANC RENATO V. PERALTA, G.R. No. 223395 Petitioner, Present: BERSAMIN, C. J., CARPIO, - versus - PERALTA, DEL CASTILLO, PERLAS-BERNABE, LEONEN, JARDELEZA, PHILIPPINE POSTAL CAGUIOA, CORPORATION (PHILPOST), TIJAM, REPRESENTED BY MA. A. REYES, JR., JOSEFINA M~ DELA CRUZ IN GESMUNDO, HER CAPACITY AS J. REYES, JR., POSTMASTER GENERALAND HERNANDO, and CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, CARANDANG,* JJ. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PHILPOST, REPRESENTED Promulgated: BY ITS CHAIRMAN CESAR N. SARINO, December 4, 2018 ' Respondents. :x--------------------------------------------------------------------~ DECISION TIJAM,J.: Assailed in this Petition for Review on Certiorari1 under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court is the Decision2 dated July 24, 2015 and the Resolution3 dated March 8, 2016 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. CV No. ·On leave. 1 Rollo, pp. 3-14. 2 Penned by Associate Justice Remedios A. Salazar-Fernando, with the concurrence of Associate Justices Priscilla J. Baltazar-Padilla and Socorro B. Inting. CA rollo, pp. 79-94. / 3 Id. at 135-140. ~ Decision 2 G.R. No. 223395 ] 03] 51. The Antecedents On May 10, 2014, respondent Philippine Postal Corporation (PhilPost) issued a stamp commemorating Iglesia ni Cristo's (INC's) Centennial Celebration. The design of the stamp showed a photo of INC founder, the late Felix Y. Manalo (Manalo) with the designation on the left side containing the words "Felix Y Afunalo, 1886-196 3 First Executive !v[inister of Iglesia ni Cristo", with the Central Temple of the religious group at the background. At the right side of Manalo's photo is the INC's centennial logo which contained a torch enclosed by a two concentric circles containing the words "IGLESIA NJ CRISTO CENTENNJAL 1914-2014".4 On June 16, 2014, petitioner Renato V. -
Republic Act No
The PHILIPPINE CONSTITUTION, STATUTES and JURISPRUDENCE on FREEDOM OF RELIGION The CONSTITUTION 2 Bill of Rights Article III, Section 5 REPUBLIC ACT NO. 386 2 THE CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES ACT NO. 3815 4 THE REVISED PENAL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES JURISPRUDENCE 1. Ebralinag, et als vs The Division Superintendent 6 of Schools of Cebu, (1995) and Amolo vs Division Superintendent of Schools of Cebu (1995) 2. Iglesia ni Cristo vs The Honorable Court of Appeals (1996) 10 3. Estrada vs Escritor (2003) 15 4. Soriano vs Laguardia (2009) 130 2 THE CONSTITUTION Article III BILL OF RIGHTS Section 5. No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights. REPUBLIC ACT NO. 386 AN ACT TO ORDAIN AND INSTITUTE THE CIVIL CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES CHAPTER 2 Human Relations (n) Article 19. Every person must, in the exercise of his rights and in the performance of his duties, act with justice, give everyone his due, and observe honesty and good faith. Article 20. Every person who, contrary to law, wilfully or negligently causes damage to another, shall indemnify the latter for the same. Article 21. Any person who wilfully causes loss or injury to another in manner that is contrary to morals, good customs or public policy shall compensate the latter for the damage. Article 32. Any public officer -
Ng Tabak Ng Dios Ng Tabak Ng Dios
ng Tabak ng Dios ng Tabak ng Dios i Mga Nilalaman Bukas Na Liham: Bakit ako itiniwalag? ............................................................................... 1-5 Kapitulo 1 Pagkakaisa sa Pagboto: Kalapastanganang aral ni Jacob! ............................................................................................. 6-37 Bago mag-Snap Election: 6-7 Pagkatapos ng Snap Election: 7 Bago maganap ang Plebesito: 7-8 May bahagi ang Dios kahit sa ating pagboto. 8-9 Hindi tayo dapat magkaroon ng pagkabahabahagi kundi isa lamang sa paghatol. 9-10 Ang unang Iglesia ni Cristo ay nagkaisa noon at pinarusahan ang hindi nakipagkaisa. 11-12 Totoo ba na ibinabalita nila sa atin ang mga nakasulat sa Biblia? Nang sila’y pumili ng ipapalit kay Judas. 12 Nang pinili nila ang pitong kapatid na maglilingkod sa mga dulang 13-14 Nang sila’y humirang ng makakasama nina Pablo at Bernabe. 14-15 Lahat ba ng mga kapatid ay nakipagkaisa? 15-16 Tinakot ba ang mga kapatid na parurusahan ang hindi makikipagkaisa? 16-18 Makatuwiran bang gawing halimbawa sina Ananias at Safira ng pinarusahan dahil sa hindi pakikipagkaisa? 18-19 Masama ang pagkakaroon ng pagkakampikampi. 19-22 Ayon sa Filipos 2:1, kailan dapat gawin ang pagkakaisa? 22-23 Nakikipagkaisa tayo sa Dios sa ating pagboto? 23-24 ii Nilalaman Ang Pagkakaisa sa Pagboto ay nakaluluwalhati sa Dios. 24-25 Mapapalad tayo kapag inalimura sa pangalan ni Cristo. 25-26 Ang mga tanong na ikinagulat ni Ka Romulo Campania. 26 Ang Kalapastanganang Aral ni Jacob! 26-29 Ano ang bagong bagay na nilikha ng Dios na naging