Pak. J. Bot .,46(2):555563,2014.

TAXONOMICALSTUDIESONENDEMIC PYGMAEA VAR.PYGMAEA ANDVAR.NUTANS STAT.NOV.()FROMTURKEY ONURKOYUNCU* 1,Ö.KORAYYAYLACI 1ANDGÖKHANKU 2 1DepartmentofBiology,FacultyofArtandSciences,EskiehirOsmangaziUniversity,Eskiehir,Turkey 2DepartmentofHealthProgramme,OpenEducationFaculty,AnadoluUniversity,Eskiehir,Turkey *Correspondingauthor’semail:[email protected] Abstract The taxonomic status of Scorzonera pygmaea var. pygmaea and var. nutans belonging to the tribe. cichoreae (Asteraceae).S.pygmaea sampleswerecollectedfromArayitmountain.Wesuggestthatthesetwosubspeciesshouldbe classifiedasvarietesbecauseoftheirmorphologicalandanatomicalcharacteristics,ecologicalandgeographicalsimilarities. Moreoverbeingtogetherinthesamelocalitiesoftheseunderspeciestaxasupportsouropinion,i.e.S.pygmaea Sibth.& Sm.var. pygmaeastat. nov. and S. pygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. nutans (Czeczott)O.Koyuncu&Yaylacı, stat.nov. Introduction In addition, Chamberlain (1975) while revising the genus Scorzonera for Flora of Turkey observed some Genus Scorzonera L. (Tribe cichoreae Asteraceae) taxonomicproblemsin S.pygmaea .“TheKastamonuand has approximately 180 species in the world (Bremer, Zonguldak of S. pygmaea consistently differ in 1994;Makbuletal.,2011a).Althoughitoriginatesfrom beinggenerallylargerthanthosefromBursaandIsparta ancientMediterranean,itdistributesfromaridregionsof but may only represent peripheral variant populations. Eurasia to Northern Africa. This genus is fairly in Czeczottdescribedthecapitulaof S. nutans as nodding. intricate (Bremer, 1994; Nazarova, 1997; Lack, 2007; Thisissurelyanartifact;thespecimensfromIlgazDağı Makbuletal.,2011a,b).Themostsignificanttaxonomical donotshowthisfeature”(Chamberlain,1975). problemofthisgenusishavingtoomuchmorphological The first specimens belonging to S. pygmaea were variation (Bremer, 1994; Makbul et al., 2011b). collectedbySithorbianumfromA2(A)Bursa,Turkeyin Taxonomic problems of this genus are not investigated theOlympus(Uludağ)anddescribedasanewspeciesby sufficiently and there are still many controversial issues SithorbianumandSm.in1806(Chamberlain,1975).The (Nazarova,1997;Türkmenetal.,2010). firstspecimensbelongingtoS.nutans werecollectedby A complete classification of genus Scorzonera was CzeczottfromA4Çankiri,TurkeyintheIlgazMountain made by De Candolle (1805). Then, the genus was in1925andwasdescribedasanewspeciesin1939.Later revised again by Boissier (1875) and Lipschitz (1935, thisspecieswasreducedasS.pygmaea subsp.nutansby 1939). Among these revisions, the work of Lipschitz Chamberlain(1975). (1939) was the most comprehensive. Scorzonera is Inordertoascertainthetaxonomicstatusofboththe represented by 28 species in (Chater, 1976). endemic taxa anatomic, morphologic, palynologic, Chamberlain(1975)reported39taxafromTurkey.After distributionandconservationstatuswasinvestigated. Chamberlain a few new taxa were added (Davis et al., 1988; Güner et al., 2000; Duran, 2002a,b; Kilian & MaterialandMethods Parolly, 2002; Parolly & Kilian, 2003; Duran & Hamzaoğlu, 2004; Duran & Hamzaoğlu, 2004; Dinç & Specimen samples: We collected some Scorzonera Bağcı,2009;Özhatayetal.,2009;Doğan&Duran,2010; pygmaea specimens in the Arayit Mountain (Eskiehir), Hamzaoğlu et al., 2010; Doğan et al., 2011; Özhatay et UludağMountain(Bursa)andIlgazMountain(Çankiri)in al., 2011;Cokunçelebietal.,2012;Makbuletal.,2012). 20092011. Currently, Scorzonera is represented by 47 species, 7 subspeciesand4varietiesinTurkey,28ofthesetaxaare Morphological studies: Fresh samples were endemic. Anatolia is a diversity centre for the genus identifiedwiththehelpofrelevantliteratureonLipzicht Scorzonerawithmorethan50taxa. (1935, 1939), Czezott (1939), Chamberlain (1975) and Some studies have been performed on anatomical, Chater (1976). Morphological studies were conducted morphological,palynological,genetical,pharmacological, with stereo microscope Olympus CH 50. In addition, ethnobotanical, distribution and conservational status in photosofvariouspartsweretakenbyNikonSZ120.The genus Scorzonera (Metcalfe & Chalk, 1950; D’amato, morphological characters were compared with that of 2000; Meo & Khan, 2004; Makbul, 2006; Karaer & Chamberlain(1975). Celep,2007;Qureshietal.,2008a,b;Dinç etal.,2008; Dinç&Bağci,2009;Makbuletal., 2010,2011a,b,2012; Türkmenetal.,2010;Martinetal.,2012;Cokunçelebiet Anatomical studies: The samples were kept in 70% al.,2012;Yildirim&enol,2012). alcohol until the sections were prepared. We obtained Anatomical characters are quite important in somecrosssectionsofroots,stemsandleavesmanually. systematics of Scorzonera . Although classification of Wealsoobtainedloweranduppercrosssectionsfromthe Scorzonera seemseasy,showingtoomuchvariationof fresh leaves. The sections were photographed by the the genus makes its identification harder (Makbul et Kameram™ digital camera and an Nikon 80i type al.,2011a,b). microscopeinourDepartment. 556 ONURKOYUNCU ETAL .,

Palynologicalstudies: Forpalynologicalstudiespollen with a Jeol 5600 LV scanning electron microscope materialwasobtainedfromfreshflowerspecimens.The (Walker,1974a,b).Terminologiesforpollenmorphology pollen morphology was investigated through Light proposed by Wodehouse (1935), Erdtman (1952, 1954, Microscope (LM) and Scanning Electron Microscope 1966, 1969), Pokrovskaia (1958), Kuprianova (1965), (SEM).FaegriandIversen’sterminologywereusedfor Skvarla (1966), Kapp (1968), Aytuğ et al ., (1971), thenamingoftheexinelayers(Faegri&Iversen1975). Charpinetal ., (1974),Walker(1974a,b)andFaegriand Under light microscope the pollen acquired from the Iversen(1975),Moore etal .,(1991)andPehlivan(1995) samples was investigated by Wodehouse (1935) and wereemployed. Erdtman (1952) methods. Pollen identifications were obtained by Prior binocular microscope. The materials ResultandDiscussion werepreparedaccordingtoWodehouse’sandErdtman’s methods; the exine and intine thickness pertaining to Morphological characteristics: Some morphological taxa are measured a minimum 20 and a maximum 50 charactersofS.pygmaea wereexaminedandcompared times. From these obtained measurements, a natural with the description of Chamberlain, (1975). Some mathematical mean is calculated. Microphotographs specificcharactersinthetypedescriptionwerecorrected were taken at the Eskiehir Osmangazi University (flowering stem 1,511 cm, leaves 1,27 x 0,203 cm, Science and Art Faculty, Department of Biology by capitula straight or nodding and pappus lower part Kameram™digitalcameraandaNikon80imicroscope. sparselyplumose)andsomecharacterswhichwerenot For scanning electron microscopy (SEM) mentioned in type description were mentioned for the investigations, unacetolyzed pollen grains were directly firsttimewiththisstudy(achenelength,fruiting)(Figs. placedontostubs,sputtercoatedwithgold,andexamined 13,Table1). Table1.Comparativemorphologyof Scorzonera pygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. pygmaea andvar. nutans (Czeczott)O.Koyuncu&Yaylacı Characters S. pygmaea var . pygmaea S. pygmaea var . nutans Habitus cushionforming,withnumerousscapiformstems cushionforming,withnumerousscapiformstems Stem allleavesbasal,1,55(7) allleavesbasal,(3)511 Leavesentire,1,21,9x0,20,3cmLineartolinear Leavesentire,1,87x0,20,3cmLineartolinear Leaf lanceolat,sparselylanat,±amplexicaule lanceolat,sparselylanat,±amplexicaule Capitula 1perstem,straight 1perstem,Nodding Outerphyllary pubescent,35mmlong,ovattolanceolat pubescent,35mmlong,ovattolanceolat Innerphyllary pubescent,acute pubescent,acute Lobesofligule 0,51,5long 0,51,5long Branchesofstyle c.5mmlong c.5mmlong Pappus pinktinged pinktinged Hairsofpappus plumosebelow,barbellateabove sparselyplumosebelow,barbellateabove Achenelength 67mm 78mm Flowering 67(8) 67(8) Fruiting 78(9) 78(9)

Fig.1.Generalappearance.(a) Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. pygmaea (habit,inUludağBursa),(b) Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. nutans (Czeczott)O.Koyuncu&Yaylaci(habit,inIlgazMountainÇankiri). TAXONOMICALSTUDIESONENDEMICFROMTURKEY 557

Fig.2.LMmicrographs. Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. pygmaea :acapitulum,bachene; Scorzonera pygmaea Sibth.& Sm.var. nutans (Czeczott)O.Koyuncu&Yaylaciccapitulum,dachene.

Fig.3.LM micrographsofphyllaries. Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. pygmaea. : aouterphyllaries,binnerphyllaries; Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. nutans (Czeczott)O.Koyuncu&Yaylacı:couterphyllaries,dinnerphyllaries. 558 ONURKOYUNCU ETAL .,

Taxonomictreatment Scorzonera pygmaea Sibth. & Sm. var. nutans (Czeczott)O.Koyuncu&Yaylacı stat. nov. Adetailedmorphologicalexaminationsoftwotaxa, revealed that both were similar in terms of many Basionym: Scorzonera nutans Czeczott, Feddes Report characters(habit,outerphyllary,innerphyllary,lobesof Beih.107:202,t.36(1938). ligule,branchesofstyle,floweringandfruiting).Onthe other hand, some differences were found in terms of some characters: subsp. pygmaea ; stem; 1,55 (7) cm, Synonym: Scorzonera pygmaea Sibth. & Sm. subsp. leaf; 1,21,9 x 0,20,3 cm, capitula; straight, hairs of Nutans (Czeczott)Chamberlain,NotesR.B.G.Edinb.33: pappus;plumosebelow,barbellateabove,achenelength; 433(1975). 67mm,subsp. nutans ;stem;(3)511cm,Leaf;1,87x 0,20,3cm,capitula;nodding,hairsofpappus;sparsely Syntypes: Turkey A4 Çankırı: Cacumine montis Kush plumosebelow,barbellateabove,achenelength;78mm Kayasy (jugum Ilgaz Da.), c. 2400 m, 26 vii 1925, (Figs.13;Table1). Czeczott439,439bis. Inviewofmorphologicalsimilarlyofboththetaxaand sympaticdistribution(Fig.7) Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.& Sm.subsp. nutans . Scorzonera pygmaea: Dwarf cushionforming, ± subscabigerous perennial, 1,511 cm; rootstock thick, Scorzonera pygmaea Sibth.&Sm.var. pygmaea cylindrical. Leaves entire, 1,27 x 0,203 cm linear to linear lanceolat, sparsely lanat, especially below, ± Synonyms: Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.&Sm.Prodr.,Fl. amplexicaul. Capitula 1 per stem, 1317 mm long. Graec.2:122(1806) Phyllaries pubescent, inner 913 mm, linear lanceolat; =Scorzonerapygmaea Sibth.&Sm.subsp. pygmaea , outer35mmlongovatlanceolat.Flowerspaleyellow. Ic:Sibth.&Sm.,Fl.Graeca8:t.783(1833). Achenes 57,5 mm, cylindrical, ridged, otherwise Type: TurkeyA2(A)Bursa:OlympoBithyno(UluDa.), smooth, glabrous; pappus pink tinged, hairs barbellate cacumine,Sibthop. above,plumosebelow.Fl.68,Fr.78(9). Flowering stems 1,55 (7) cm, straight; leaves 1219 mm; papus lower part plumose ...... ..…………………………………………………………………………...... var.pygmaea Floweringstems(3)511cm,nodding;leaves(18)3070mm;papuslowerpartsparselyplumose...... ...... …………………………………………………………………...... var.nutans Anatomicalcharacteristics cellsarecoveredwithdensesimpleorbranchedhairs, the others are generally smooth. The collenchyma is Scorzonera pygmaea var.Pygmaea: leaf:Itisecvifacial generallylocatedveryclosetotheepidermis,withtwo type and mesophyll consists of 23 layers of palisade or three to four rows. The cortex consists of usually insideofupperepidermis,2layersofpalisadebeneaththe parenchymatic oval cells, with seven or eigth to ten lowerepidermisand23layersofsponge(Fig.4a). rows. The vascular bundles, interconnected with an intravascularsclerenchyma,formedoneortwotothree Stem: Theepidermaltissueconsistsofasinglerowof continuousringsinthestem.Secretorycellsarelocated rectangular or orbicular cells. Some of the epidermal veryclosetothephloemtissue.Scleranchymatouscells cellsarecoveredwithdensesimpleorbranchedhairs, arepresentinthephloemandxylem.Thereisalsolarge the others are generally smooth. The collenchyma is pithinthestemcentre(Fig.4d). generallylocatedveryclosetotheepidermis,withtwo or three to four rows. The cortex consists of usually Palynologicalcharacteristics parenchymaticovalcells,with7or8to10rows.The vascularbundles,interconnectedwithanintravascular Scorzonera pygmaea var. pygmaea: Pollengrainsare sclerenchyma,formedoneortwotothreecontinuous radially symmetrical, isopolar, oblatespheroidal. The ringsinthestem.Secretorycellsarelocatedveryclose size (polar axis x equatorial diameter, excluding to the phloem tissue. Scleranchymatous cells are spines)rangesfrom39.28(42–38)×42.57(48–39)m presentinthephloemandxylem.Thereisalsolarge inWodhouseand40.28(42–38)×41.57(45–39)min pithinthestemcentre(Fig.4c). Erdtman.Ithasechinolophate,trizonocolporatepollen Scorzonera pygmaea var.nutans with 15 lacune (6 abporal, 3 poral and 6 paraporal). Thespinesareconvexconicwithabroadenedbaseand Leaf:Itisecvifacialtypeandmesophyllconsistsof23 ataperedapicalportion.Thelengthofthespineis3.9 layersofpalisadeinsideofupperepidermis,2layers of (3.2–4.3)manditswidthatthebaseis3.0(2.8–3.3) palisade beneath the lower epidermis and 23 layers of m.Thebaseofthespineshasirregularly1–2seriate 2 sponge(Fig.4b). perforations with small holes (0.3 m) and m 3–4 perforates. Exine 4.6 (4.3–5.2) m. Sexine is much Stem: Theepidermaltissueconsistsofasinglerowof thicker than nexine. Intine 1.25 (1.0–2.0) m (Figs. rectangular or orbicular cells. Some of the epidermal 5a,b;6a,b;Tables2;3). TAXONOMICALSTUDIESONENDEMICFROMTURKEY 559

Fig.4.Crosssectionsofleaf:(a) Scorzonerapygmaea var. pygmaea (b) Scorzonerapygmaea var. nutans .Crosssectionsofstem:(c) Scorzonerapygmaea var. pygmaea (d) Scorzonerapygmaea var. nutans .Abbreviations:(c)cortex,(cu)cuticula,(cl)collenchyma,(e) epidermis, (le) lower epidermis, (p) parenchyma, (ph) phloem, (phs) phloem sclerenchyma, (pp) palisade parenchyma, (s) sclerenchyma,(sp)spongeparenchyma,(ue)upperepidermis,(xl)xylem.

Fig. 5. Light micrographs of pollen grains. Scorzonera pygmaea var. pygmaea : (a) polar view, (b) equatorial wiew, Scorzonera pygmaea var. nutans :(c)polarview,(d)equatorialwiew. 560 ONURKOYUNCU ETAL .,

Fig.6.Scanningelectronmicrographs(SEM)ofpolengrains. Scorzonerapygmaea var. pygmaea :(a)overview,(b)ornamentation. Scorzonerapygmaea var.nutans :(c)overview,(d)ornamentation. Scorzonera pygmaea var. nutans: Pollen grains radially (Sivrihisar), zirve civarı, N 39º 18' 07''E 31º 44' 57'', symmetrical,isopolar,oblatespheroidal.Thesize(polaraxis 1817m, 09 vii 2009, OUFE 16466; C5 Konya: Ereğli, xequatorialdiameter,excluding spines)ranges from40.30 AydosDağı,Kayasaray,Sayıntamevkii,2500ma.s.l., (45–38)×43(46–39)minWodhouseand39.25(43–33)× 15.vii.1977,S.Erik2602,(Chamberlain,1975;Duran& 44.70 (48–41) m in Erdtman. It has echinolophate, Hamzaoğlu,2004)(Fig.3). trizonocolporate pollen with 15 lacune (6 abporal, 3 poral and 6 paraporal). The spines are convexconic with a Scorzonera pygmaea var. nutans broadenedbaseandataperedapicalportion.Thelengthof thespineis2.9(2.5–3.4)manditswidthatthebaseis3.0 It is endemic to N. Anatolia. A2 Bursa: Uludağ, (2.8–3.3) m. The base of the spines has irregularly 1–2 24002500ma.s.l.,28.vii.2001,Y.Menemen512&E. 2 seriate perforationswith small holes (0.3 m) and m 3–4 Hamzaoğlu;Bursa:Uludağ, zirve yolu,N40º05'52''E perforates.Exine3.6(3.1–4.2)m. Sexineis muchthicker 29º11'18'',2280m,01vii2009,OUFE;A4Zonguldak: thannexine.(Figs.5c,d;6c,d;Table2;3). Keltepe above Karabük, 1950 m, Davis 38914!; Kastamonu: Ilgaz Da., 2200 m, D. 21577!; Ilgaz Dağı, Distribution: Küçükhacet tepesi, ca. 2400 m a.s.l., 29. vii. 1982, Y. Akman12178,E.Yurdakulol&M.Demirörs;Karabük: Scorzonera pygmaea var. pygmaea Keltepe, ca. 1950 m a.s.l., 12. vii. 1984, M. Demirörs 1263; Çankırı: Ilgaz Dağı, TRT vericisi civarı, 2000 m ItisendemictoN.W.&S.W.Anatolia.A2(A)Bursa: a.s.l.,21.vii.2001,A.Duran5818&Y.Menemen; BithynianOlypus(UluDa.),19viii1850,Clementi!Đbid., Çankırı:IlgazDağı,TRTvericisicivarı,N41º03'07''E 23002500m;Davis14846!Đbid.,2400m;Sorger6854 33º 42' 58'', 2070m, 12 vii 2009, OUFE 16467; A5 23!;BursaUludağP.Quezel,1968;Bursa:Uludağ,zirve Kastamonu:IlgazDa.,2000m.Darrah28!;B3Eskiehir: yolu,N40º05'36''E29º10'34'',2245m,01vii2009, OUFE; A4 Ankara: Çubuk, Karagöl, ca. 1700 m a.s.l., ArayitDağı(Sivrihisar),zirvecivarı,N39º18'11''E31º 5.vi.1974, S. Erik 531; C3 Isparta: Dedegöl Da., 1600 45'02'',1830m,09vii2009,OUFE16468;(Chamberlain, 2400m, Sorger 704624!; Çankırı: Ilgaz Dağı, TRT 1975;Duran&Hamzaoğlu,2004)(Fig.3). vericisicivarı,N41º07'46''E33º40'24'',2010m,12vii We observed together in at least three different 2009, OUFE 16465; B3 Eskiehir: Arayit Dağı localities(Fig.7). TAXONOMICALSTUDIESONENDEMICFROMTURKEY 561

Table2.Palynologicalcomparisonof Scorzonera pygmaea var. pygmaea andvar. nutans . Characters S. pygmaea var . pygmaea S. pygmaea var . nutans Shapeinpolarview Semiangular Semiangular Spineshape Convexconic Convexconic Pollenshape Oblatespheroidal Oblatespheroidal Lachinaenumber 15(636) 15(636) Aperturetype Nonlacunate Nonlacunate PollenClass Trizonocolporate Trizonocolporate Sculpturetype Echinolophate Echinolophate Ornamentation Spinatemicroperforaterugulate Spinatemicroperforaterugulate Table3.Measurementsofpollengrainsof Scorzonera pygmaea var. pygmaea andvar. nutans . P E L t Plg P/E M S Var. M S Var. M S Var. M S Var. M S Var. var.pygmaea 39,28 1,6 4238 42,57 2,76 4839 0,92 29,57 1,72 3227 11,55 0,88 1310 11,43 0,97 1310 (W) var.pygmaea 40,28 1,38 4238 41,57 1,99 4539 0,97 26,21 1,58 2924 6,87 0,83 86 8,37 2,56 115 (E) var.nutans 40,3 2 4538 43 1,76 4639 0,94 30,4 1,84 3428 11,42 1,62 159 12,5 3,37 189 (W) var.nutans 39,25 2,7 4333 44,7 2,35 4841 0,88 28,45 2,62 3425 12,23 2,51 1710 9,5 1,83 26 (E)

Plt Clg Clt Exine Intine M S Var. M S Var. M S Var. M S Var. M S Var. var.pygmaea 6,71 0,75 86 21,85 1,68 2419 7,86 1,07 96 8,5 1,07 107 1,25 0,38 21 (W) var.pygmaea 7,31 1,46 105,5 25,28 2,43 2822 6,86 0,94 8,56 9,57 1,4 117 (E) var.nutans 5,4 0,7 64 25,3 3,53 3019 6,3 1,42 84 6,5 1,08 85 1 0,23 1,50,5 (W) var.nutans 7,62 0,97 105,5 28,1 3,48 3322 9,18 1,6 138 7 1,12 95,5 (E) Abbreviations: N:Nonacetolysed(LM),A:Acetolysed(LM),P:Polaraxis,E:Equatorialaxis,L:Equatorialdiameter, clg:Lengthofthecolpus,clt:Widthofthecolpus,plg:Lengthoftheporus,plt:Widthoftheporus,t:Apocolpium,M: Mean,S:Standarddeviations,Var:Variation.

Fig.7.Distributionmapof Scorzonerapygmaea var. pygmaea (▲)andvar. nutans ( )inTurkey. 562 ONURKOYUNCU ETAL .,

Conservation status: S. pygmaea var. pygmaea and Duran, A. and E. Hamzaoğlu. 2004. A new species of var.nutans areknownatleastfrom5localitiesandits Scorzonera (Asteraceae) from South Anatolia, Turkey. populationsareingoodcondition.However,itscanbe Biologia. 59:4750. threatened within the next 10 years. Therefore be Erdtman, G. 1952. Pollen morphology and plant . AlmqvistandWiksell,pp.133134. considered taxa Near Threatened ‘NT’ category Erdtman,G.1954. Anintroductiontopollenanalysis .Waltham, (Anon.,2001). Mass., USA, published by the Chronica Botanica Company.AlmquistandWiksell,Stockholm,p239. Acknowledgements Erdtman, G. 1966. Pollen morphology and plant taxonomy, Angiospermae .HafnerPub.,NewYork. This study was supported by Eskiehir Osmangazi Erdtman, G. 1969. Handbook of palynology, morphology, University Scientific Research Projects Commission taxonomy, ecology. An introductiontothe studyofpollen grainsandspores .HafnerPub.,NewYork. (Project name: Günyüzü (Eskiehir) ve Çevresinin rd Tohumlu Bitkiler, Karayosunu, Liken Florası ve Faegri,K.andJ.Iversen.1975. Textbookofpollenanalysis .3 ed by Knut Faegri. Scandinavian University Books, EtnobotanikÖzelliklerininBelirlenmesiileBazıTohumlu Copenhagen.,p.294. Bitkilerin Polen Morfolojileri Üzerinde Çalımalar (In Güner, A. 2000. Scorzonera L. In: Flora of Turkey and the East Turkish). ProjectNumber:2010/19029). Aegean Islands. (Eds.): A. Güner, N. Özhatay, T. Ekim, K.H.C.Baer.Suppl.Vol.11.EdinburghUniv.Pres.,p.167. References Hamzaoğlu,E.,A.Aksoy,N.M.PınarandH.Çölgeçen.2010.A newrecordforthefloraofTurkey: Scorzoneraketzkhovelii Anonymous. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories: Version 3.1. Gross.(Asteraceae). TurkishJ.Bot., 34:5761. PreparedbytheIUCNSpeciesSurvivalCommission. Kapp, R.O. 1968. How to know pollen and spores. Wm. C. IUCN,GlandandCambridge. BrownCompany,Dubuque. Aytug,B.,S.Aykut,N.MerevandG.Edis.1971. Pollen Karaer,F.andF.Celep.2007.Rediscoveryof Scorzoneraamasiaca AtlasofPlantsfromEnvironsofIstanbul(InTurkish). Hausskn.andBornm.,athreatenedendemicspeciesinTurkey. YayınNo.1654/174,KurtulmuMatbaası,Đstanbul. WorldAppliedSciencesJournal ,2:682686. Boissier,E.P.1875. FloraOrientalis .Composees3:151883. Kilian,N.andG.Parolly.2002. Scorzoneraulrichii Parolly& Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae: Cladistics and classification. N.Kilian,sp.nova.In:GreuterW.&RausT.(eds),Med TimbersPress,Portland. CheklistNotulae,21. Willdenowia ,32:198200. Candolle,A.P.1805. Flore Francaise. Paris,4:61. Kuprianova,L.A.1965. ThepalynologyoftheAmentiferae. The Chamberlain,D.F.1975. Scorzonera L.In: FloraofTurkeyand AcademyofSciencesoftheUSSR,Moscow,p.214. the East Aegean Islands. (Ed.): P.H. Davis. Edinburgh Lack, H.W. 2007. Tribe Lam. & DC. In: The UniversityPress,Edinburgh,pp.632657. Families and Genera of Vascular Plants , (Ed.): Kubitzki. Charpin, J., R. Surinyach and A.W. Frankland. 1974. Atlas of Vol.VIII, Flowering Plants. , : Kadereit Europeanallergenicpollens. SandozEditions,Paris,pp2023. & Jeffrey (eds.): 180199. Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer Chater,A.O.1976. Scorzonera L.In: FloraEuropaea. (Eds.): T.G.Tutin,V.H.Heywood,N.A.Burges,D.H.Valentine, Verlag. S.M.WaltersandD.A.Webb.CambridgeUniversityPress, Lipschitz, S.J. 1935. Fragmenta monographiae generis 4:pp.317322. Scorzonera . Transactions of the Rubber and Guttapercha Cokunçelebi,K.,S.Makbul,M.Gültepe,D.Onat,M.E.Güzel Institute,Moscow,1:1164(InRussian). andS.Okur.2012.AnewScorzonera(Asteraceae)species Lipschitz, S.J. 1939. Fragmenta monographiae generis from South Anatolia, Turkey, and its taxonomic position Scorzonera. Soc. Nat. Curiosiorum Mosquensis, Moscow, basedonmoleculardata. TurkishJ.Bot.,36:299310. 2:1165. D’amato, G. 2000. Speckled florescent banding pattern in Makbul, S. 2006. Morphological and anatomical features of Scorzonera (Asteraceae). Hereditas .132:265267. Scorzonera L. (Asteraceae) taxa distributed in the Black Davis, P.H., R.R. Mill and K. Tan. 1988. Scorzonera L. In: SeaRegionofTurkey.Ph.D.Thesis.KaradenizTechnical FloraofTurkeyandtheEastAegeanIslands. (Eds.): University,Trabzon,Turkey(inTurkish). P.H.Davis etal.,Suppl.Vol.10.EdinburghUniv.Pres., Makbul, S., K. Coskuncelebi and O. Beyazoğlu. 2011b. Notes pp.169170. onthestemanatomyof Scorzonera (Asteraceae)taxafrom Dinç,M.andY.Bağci.2009.TaxonomicalandChorologicalNotes NortheastTurkey. PhytologiaBalcanica ,17(1):113121. on the Turkish Endemic Scorzonera amasiana Hausskn. & Makbul, S., K. Cokunçelebi, M. Gültepe, S. Okur and M.E. Bornm.(Asteraceae). TurkishJ.Bot., 33:127130. Güzel. 2012. Scorzonera ahmetduranii sp. nov. Dinç, M., A. Duran and E. Martin. 2008. Rediscovery of the (Asteraceae)fromsouthwestAnatolia,anditsphylogenetic poorly known Scorzonera argyria and its relationships in position. NordicJournalofBotany. 30:211. Turkey. Biologia. 63(6):10781084. Makbul, S., K. Cokunçelebi, Z. Türkmen and O. Beyazoğlu. Doğan,B.andA.Duran.2010.Anewrecordforthe flora of 2011a. Comparison of Foliar Anatomy of Scorzonera L. Turkey: Scorzonerarenzii Rech.f.(Asteraceae). Biological (Asteraceae)TaxaFromNorthEastAnatolia. Pak.J.Bot., DiversityandConservation .3:133136. 43(1):135155. Doğan,B.,A.DuranandS.Makbul.2011. Scorzoneratuzgoluensis Makbul, S., Z. Türkmen, K. Cokunçelebi and O. Beyazoğlu. sp. nov. (Asteraceae), a new halophytic species from central 2010. Amorphometric study on Scorzonera L. taxa Anatolia,Turkey. Nord.J.Bot., 29:2025. (Asteraceae) from northeast Anatolia. Acta Botanica Duran,A.2002a.Anewspeciesof Scorzonera L.(Asteraceae) Croata. 69(2):237247. fromAnatolia,Turkey. Pak.J.Bot., 34(3):385389. Martin, E., Ö. Çetin, S. Makbul, A. Duran, M. Öztürk, D. Duran,A.2002b.Anewspeciesof Scorzonera L.(Asteraceae) Boduroğlu and B. Emekaya. 2012. Karyology of the from Central Anatolia, Turkey. Israel J. Plant Sci. 50: Scorzonera L.(Asteraceae) taxa from Turkey. TurkishJ. 155159. Bot .,36:187199. TAXONOMICALSTUDIESONENDEMICFROMTURKEY 563

Meo, A.A. and M.A. Khan. 2004. Pollen Morphology As An Qureshi,S.J.,M.A.KhanandA.Rashid.2008b.Diameter,Exine Aid To The Identification of Scorzonera (Cichorieae Thickness,andSculpturingingenera Scorzonera L., Sonchus CompositaeFromPakistan. Pak.J.Bot .,36(4):701710. L.and L.ofAsteraceaeinPakistan. International Metcalfe, C.R. and L. Chalk. 1950. Anatomy of Dicotyledons. JournalofScience&Technology ,3(2):139149. ClarendonPress,Oxford. Qureshi,S.J.,M.A.KhanandM.Ahmad.2008a.Comparative Moore, P.D., J.A. Webb and M.E. Collinson. 1991. Pollen morphology, palynology and anatomy of five astraceous analysis, 2nd ed.BlackwellScientificPublications,Oxford, species from Pakistan. African J. of Agr. Res .,3(9):622 216p. 632. Nazarova, E.A. 1997. Karyosystematic investigation of the Skvarla, J.J. 1966. Techniques of pollen and spore electron genus Scorzonera L. s.l. (Lactuceae, Asteraceae). microscopy. I. Staining, dehydration and embedding. Caryologia ,50:239261. OklahomaGeol.Notes ,26:179186. Özhatay,F.N.,.KültürandM.B.Gürdal.2011.Checklistof Türkmen, Z, S. Makbul, K. Coskuncelebi and O. Beyazoğlu. additional taxa to the supplement Flora of Turkey V. 2010.Palynologicalobservationsonthegenus Scorzonera TurkishJ.Bot .,35:589624. L.(Asteraceae)fromnortheastAnatolia(Turkey).Turkish Özhatay, F.N., . Kültür and S. Aslan. 2009. Checklist of J.Bot .,34:495512. additional taxa to the supplement flora of Turkey IV. Vardar, Y. 1987. Botanikte Preperasyon Tekniği . Ege TurkishJ.Bot .,33:191226. Universitesi,FenFakültesiYayınları,Đzmir(inTurkish). Parolly, G. and N. Kilian. 2003. Scorzonera karabelensis Walker,J.W.1974a.Evolutionofexinestructureinthepollen Parolly&N.Kilian(Compositae),anewspeciesfromSW ofprimitiveAngiosperms. Am.J.Bot .,61:891902. Anatolia, with a key to the subscapigerous Scorzonera Walker, J.W. 1974b. Aperture evolution in the pollen of speciesinTurkey. Willdenowia ,33:327335. primitiveangiosperms. Am.J.Bot ., 61:11121137. Pehlivan,S.1995. AllergenicpollenatlasofTurkey .ÜnalOffset Wodehouse,R.P.1935. Pollengrains. McGrewHill,NewYork PrintingPress,Ankara(inTukish). Yildirim,H.andS.G.enol.2012.Anewdistribution area of Pokrovskaia,I.M.1958.Analysepollinique,Publieavecl’aide Scorzoneraargyria Boiss.(Asteraceae)andcontributionof duCentreNationaldelaRechercheScientifique,Moscou. it’s morphological characters. Biological Diversity and Numero,24:398431. Conservation ,3(3):69. (Receivedforpublication23November2012)