DOCSLIB.ORG

Computational Chemistry Column 291

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Computational Chemistry Column 291 COMPUT ATIONAL CHEMISTRY COLUMN 288 CHIMIA 52 (1998) NT.6 (lull;) COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY Column Editors: Prof. Dr. H. Huber, University of Basel COLUMN Prof. Dr. K. Muller, F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel _______________ PO Dr. H.P. Luthi, ETH-Ziirich Chimia 52 (1998) 288-291 E(X -Y) = EMM(X-Y) - © Neue Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft 1SSN 0009-4293 EMM(Y) + EQM(Y) (1) Effectively, this amounts to an interpo- lation between independent QM and MM calculations where the QM/MM interac- Combined Quantum Mechanical tions are described by the force field. This model is simple and robust, and can be and Molecular Mechanical generalized easily: the IMOMM method [7] becomesIMOMO [9] orONIOM [10], Approaches depending on whether two different QM procedures or several QM and MM proce- dures are combined together. Tiziana Z. Mordasini and Walter Thiel* In the case of a mechanical embed- ding, the wave function in the QM region does not feel the influence of the environ- Abstract. The embedding of a quantum mechanical region in a molecular mechanical ment. Such an approximation is more ap- environment allows a theoretical treatment of very large systems. This article reviews propriate for apolar than for polar systems. recent methodological developments for such hybrid methods and surveys selected To account for the electrostatic influence applications including solvation effects, enzymatic reactions, and electronic excita- of a polar environment (e.g., in aqueous tions in condensed phase. solution or in proteins) an electronic em- bedding of the QM region is preferable: the QM wave function is calculated in the Quantum chemical calculations are system is described as accurately as need- field of the MM partial charges and is usually applied to isolated molecules in ed using Quantum Mechanics (QM), therefore polarized relati ve to the gas phase the gas phase. Currently available quan- whereas the rest of the system is handled [1-6]. Long-range electrostatic interac- tum chemical methods provide reliable by Molecular Mechanics (MM) with an tions can be taken into account with an results for structures, stabilities, spectra, appropriate force field. Such hybrid QM/ appropriate Ewald summation [II]. and reactions of isolated molecules (with MM procedures [1-5] allow a tailored This standard model of electronic em- computational effort and accuracy depend- treatment of very large systems. In this bedding only contains the polarization of ing on molecular size). However, experi- article, recent methodological advances the QM region. For higher precision and mental work is mostly carried out not in are briefly outlined, and some typical ap- for theoretical consistency, it would seem the gas phase, but in the condensed phase. plications are presented. The literature has advisable to include also the polarization The quantitative calculation of such pro- been covered until the end of 1997. of the MM region [1][6][12-17]. This can cesses poses new challenges for theory: be achieved using distributed atomic po- How can we best describe, e.g., reactions larizabilities in the MM region, which in solution, in enzymes, or at heterogene- Methods interact with the electrical field of the QM ous catalysts? How can we model the region. The interaction energies can be effects of the environment on chemical The combination of QM and MM pro- obtained either from a single-point calcu- reactions and electronic excitations? How cedures requires the definition of coupling lation using a given QM wave function can we efficiently treat systems with thou- models [6] that describe the interactions [6], or by optimizing both the QM wave sands of atoms in cases where the classical between QM and MM regions. The accu- function and theMM polarization within a force field methods fail due to the nature racy of a QM/MM calculation depends not double iterative procedure [6][12-14]. The of the problem? only on the chosen QM and MM methods, second possibility is computationally more Hybrid QM/MM methods represent a but also significantly on the coupling expensive, but theoretically more consist- promising tool for answering such ques- model. Therefore, a hierarchy of such cou- ent, and allows the deri vation of analytical tions. The basic idea [l] is quite simple: pling models has to be developed, and a gradients [13]. The direct reaction field the electronically important part of the suitable choice for each specific applica- (DRF) method provides theoretical justi- tion has to be made. fication for describing the MM polariza- The simplest coupling is based on a tion through distributed charges and di- *Correspondence: Prof. Dr. W. Thiel mechanical embedding of the QM region pole polarizabilities [15][16]. Fluctuating Organisch-chemisches lnstitut Universitat ZUrich [6-8]. In this case, the energy of the total partial charges in the MM region are an Winterthurerstrasse 190 system X -Y (QM region Y, MM region X) alternative for taking the MM polarization CH-8057 ZUrich is calculated from: into account [17]. COMPUTA TIONAL CHEMISTRY COLUMN 289 CHIMIA 52 (1998) Nr. 6 (lllni) Most of the usual force fields are static matic reactions where covalent bonds have tion of QM method, force field and cou- and do not contain terms for polarization. to be cut in order to define the active site pling model, the calibration of QM/MM If such a force field is used in a QM/MM (QM) and the protein environment (MM). interactions, the definition of QM and procedure with MM polarization, the po- In this case, one can either satisfy the free MM regions, the treatment of the link larization should only be included for the valencies with link atoms (usually hydro- atoms, and the employed simulation tech- calculation of the QM/MM interaction gen) [2][3], or freeze the electron density nique. On the other hand, these choices energy. The effects of polarization inside at the broken bond in orthogonal hybrid offer the freedom to use a specifically the MM region are covered through the orbitals [1][28-30]. Both methods have tailored theoretical approach for modeling parametrization of the force field, in an advantages and disadvantages, and it is the electronic effects in large systems average sense. A better approach for such not a priori obvious which one is prefera- which were previously not accessible to QM/MM studies would involve the devel- ble. The link-atom concept is more popu- theoretical investigation. opment of new polarizable force fields. lar, and will therefore be discussed in the For simulations in the liquid phase, such following paragraph. intermolecular force fields have already Intuitively it is reasonable to require Applications been derived [17-20]. that the link atoms do not contribute to the For an electronic embedding of the total energy of the real system [3]. A QM/MM calculations have become QM region, the total energy can schemat- corresponding link-atom correction can increasingly popular since 1990. For the ically be written as: be defined for each coupling model [6]. In QM component, semiempirical methods the simple mechanical embedding of the (e.g., MNDO, AMI, PM3) are mostly -¥ = M ) + QM region, the link atoms then do not used due to efficiency reasons, whereas EQ i(Y) + EQ 1J?lM - Y (2) present any further problems. In the elec- the MM component is normally described tronic embedding scheme, one has to de- by standard force fields without polariza- The first two terms are usually calcu- cide whether the link atoms can electro- tion terms (e.g., AMBER, CHARMM, lated exactly as in the underlying QM and statically feel the MM atoms (if yes, which GROMOS, MM2, MM3, OPLS, SPC, MM procedures. The QM/MM interac- ones), and whether they can contribute to TIP3P). The most widely used coupling tion energy is determined by the chosen the electrostatic potential and field of the models are mechanical embedding and coupling model and usually contains elec- QM region (if yes, in which form). These the simplest form of electronic embed- trostatic and van der Waals contributions details influence the QM polarization, the ding. It is only recently that more complex that can be parametrized in order to repro- balance of the electrostatic QM/MM in- QM procedures (ab initio, density func- duce experimental results or data from teractions, and therefore also the quality of tional) are employed more often and that accurate theoretical calculations. Forelec- the resul ts. Semiempirical QM procedures polarization effects in the MM region are trostatic QM/MM interactions, such spe- are less sensitive to such link-atom prob- being considered. cial parametrizations are particularly ap- lems than ab initio or density functional Many of the early successful applica- propriate in the case of semiempirical QM methods. It is generally recommended to tions ofQM/MM methodology have dealt methods [3], e.g., through a parametriza- define the QM region as large as possible, with solvation effects [5]. After a suitable tion ofthe electrostatic potentials and fields so that the link atoms are located far away parametrization of the QM/MM interac- based on ab initio results [21]. For the van from the electronically important region, tions [22][24][25], it is possible to repro- der Waals QM/MM interactions, opti- in order to minimize any problems due duce the experimental hydration energies mized van der Waals parameters of QM to the link atoms. Clearly, the same is for a large number of molecules, with atoms have been published for different also valid if frozen hybrid orbitals are errors significantly below 1kcal/mol. The types of QM procedures [22-26]. used. contribution of the QM polarization to the It seems to be generally accepted that QM/MM procedures are employed for hydration energy is typically ca. 10-20%. some parametrization of the QM/MM in- the study of large systems, where geome- More recent studies on solvation have teractions is necessary for reliable quanti- try optimizations are no longer trivial.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Semiempirical Quantum-Chemical Methods Max-Planck-Institut Für
    Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 4, 145-157 (2014), which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1161. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self- Archived Versions. Semiempirical quantum-chemical methods Walter Thiel Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung Kaiser-Wilhelm-Platz 1, 45470 Mülheim, Germany [email protected] Abstract The semiempirical methods of quantum chemistry are reviewed, with emphasis on established NDDO-based methods (MNDO, AM1, PM3) and on the more recent orthogonalization-corrected methods (OM1, OM2, OM3). After a brief historical overview, the methodology is presented in non- technical terms, covering the underlying concepts, parameterization strategies, and computational aspects, as well as linear scaling and hybrid approaches. The application section addresses selected recent benchmarks and surveys ground-state and excited-state studies, including recent OM2- based excited-state dynamics investigations. Introduction Quantum mechanics provides the conceptual framework for understanding chemistry and the theoretical foundation for computational methods that model the electronic structure of chemical compounds. There are three types of such approaches: Quantum-chemical ab initio methods provide a convergent path to the exact solution of the Schrödinger equation and can therefore give “the right answer for the right reason”, but they are costly and thus restricted to relatively small molecules (at least in the case of the highly accurate correlated approaches). Density functional theory (DFT) has become the workhorse of computational chemistry because of its favourable price/performance ratio, allowing for fairly accurate calculations on medium-size molecules, but there is no systematic path of improvement in spite of the first-principles character of DFT.
    [Show full text]
  • 2.5 Department of Theory
    Theory 2.5 Department of Theory Director: Walter Thiel (born 1949) Further group leaders: Mario Barbatti (born 1971) Left the Institute in 2015 Elsa Sánchez-García (born 1976) Matthias Heyden (born 1981) Michael Roemelt (born 1982) Joined the Institute in 2015 1 Theory Curriculum Vitae: Walter Thiel 1949 Born in Treysa, Germany 1966-1971 Chemistry studies at Universität Marburg 1971-1973 Doctoral studies at Universität Marburg, with A. Schweig 1973-1975 Postdoctoral fellow at the University of Texas at Austin, with M. J. S. Dewar 1975-1982 Research scientist at Universität Marburg 1981 Habilitation for Theoretical Chemistry 1983-1992 Associate Professor of Theoretical Chemistry at Universität Wuppertal 1987 Guest Professor at the University of California at Berkeley 1992-1999 Full Professor of Chemistry at Universität Zürich 1999 Director at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung in Mülheim/Ruhr 2001 Honorary Professor at Universität Düsseldorf Awards and Honors 1969-1974 Studienstiftung des deutschen Volkes 1975-1977 Liebig Fellowship, Verband der Chemischen Industrie 1982 Heisenberg Fellowship, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 1988 Förderpreis, Alfried-Krupp Stiftung 1991 Member, European Academy of Sciences and Arts 2002 Schrödinger Medal, World Association of Theoretical Chemists 2007 Member, Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina 2007 Member, International Academy of Quantum Molecular Sciences 2008 Member, Nordrhein-Westfälische Akademie der Wissenschaften 2009 Festschrift, Journal of Physical Chemistry A 2009, 113 (43),
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Dr. Pavlo O. Dral Publication List 20.03.2017 List of Publications of Dr. Pavlo O. Dral Peer-Reviewed Articles 18. Bettina D. Gliemann, Ana G. Petrovic, Eva M. Zolnhofer, Pavlo O. Dral, Frank Hampel, Georg Breitenbruch, Schulze Philipp, Vijay Raghavan, Karsten Meyer, Prasad L. Polavarapu, Nina Berova, Milan Kivala, Configurationally Stable Chiral Dithia-Bridged Hetero[4]helicene Radical Cation: Electronic Structure and Absolute Configuration. Chem. Asian J. 2017, 12, 31–35. DOI: 10.1002/asia.201601452. 17. Jakob F. Hitzenberger, Pavlo O. Dral, Ute Meinhardt, Timothy Clark, Walter Thiel, Milan Kivala, Thomas Drewello, Stability of Odd- Versus Even-Electron Gas-Phase (Quasi)Molecular Ions Derived from Pyridine-Substituted N-Heterotriangulenes. ChemPlusChem 2017, 82, 204–211. DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201600416. Appeared as the front cover in ChemPlusChem (p. 161, DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201600597) with the associated cover profile (p. 163, DOI: 10.1002/cplu.201600596). 16. Gerhard König, Frank C. Pickard IV, Jing Huang, Andrew C. Simmonett, Florentina Tofoleanu, Juyong Lee, Pavlo O. Dral, Samarjeet Prasad, Michael Jones, Yihan Shao, Walter Thiel, Bernard R. Brooks, Calculating Distribution Coefficients Based on Multi- Scale Free Energy Simulations: An Evaluation of MM and QM/MM Explicit Solvent Simulations of Water-Cyclohexane Transfer in the SAMPL5 Challenge. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2016, 30, 989–1006. DOI: 10.1007/s10822-016-9936-x. 15. Ute Meinhardt, Fabian Lodermeyer, Tobias A. Schaub, Andreas Kunzmann, Pavlo O. Dral, Anna Chiara Sale, Frank Hampel, Dirk M. Guldi, Ruben D. Costa, Milan Kivala, N-Heterotriangulene Chromophores with 4-Pyridyl Anchors for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. RSC Adv.
    [Show full text]
  • QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems Hans Martin Senn* and Walter Thiel*
    Reviews H. M. Senn and W. Thiel DOI: 10.1002/anie.200802019 Theoretical Chemistry QM/MM Methods for Biomolecular Systems Hans Martin Senn* and Walter Thiel* Keywords: enzyme catalysis · molecular simulations · QM/MM calculations · theoretical chemistry Angewandte Chemie 1198 www.angewandte.org 2009 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 1198 – 1229 Angewandte QM/MM Methods Chemie Combined quantum-mechanics/molecular-mechanics (QM/MM) From the Contents approaches have become the method of choice for modeling reactions in biomolecular systems. Quantum-mechanical (QM) methods are 1. Introduction 1199 required for describing chemical reactions and other electronic pro- 2. The QM/MM Method 1199 cesses, such as charge transfer or electronic excitation. However, QM methods are restricted to systems of up to a few hundred atoms. 3. Optimization and Simulation However, the size and conformational complexity of biopolymers calls Techniques for QM/MM 1206 for methods capable of treating up to several 100000 atoms and 4. Survey of QM/MM Applications 1208 allowing for simulations over time scales of tens of nanoseconds. This is achieved by highly efficient, force-field-based molecular mechanics 5. Recent Biomolecular QM/MM (MM) methods. Thus to model large biomolecules the logical Studies 1214 approach is to combine the two techniques and to use a QM method 6. Summary and Outlook 1214 for the chemically active region (e.g., substrates and co-factors in an enzymatic reaction) and an MM treatment for the surroundings (e.g., protein and solvent). The resulting schemes are commonly referred to as combined or hybrid QM/MM methods.
    [Show full text]
  • Deniz Tuna January 7, 2019
    Deniz Tuna January 7, 2019 Stanford University Department of Chemistry Stanford, California 94305 +1 650 926 4057 [email protected] www: Stanford Profiles, Google Scholar Postdoctoral Research Experience 05/2017–present Stanford University, Stanford, USA and SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, USA Advisor: Todd J. Martínez. Research focus: Ab initio multiple spawning nonadiabatic dynamics simulations of biochromophores in solution and in protein environments with QM/MM. 05/2014–04/2017 Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany Advisor: Walter Thiel. Research focus: Application of semiempirical methods to electronically excited states of organic and biomolecules. Benchmarks of linear-response and semiempirical methods for excited states and conical intersections. Trajectory-surface-hopping nonadiabatic dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Education 04/2014 Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany: conferment of Dr. rer. nat. degree. Grade: summa cum laude (“with highest distinction”). 01/2010–04/2014 Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany: doctoral student. Advisor: Wolfgang Domcke. Title of thesis: “Quantum-Chemical Deniz Tuna – page 1 Investigations into the Photophysics and Photochemistry of Bioorganic Molecules”. 12/2009 Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany: conferment of “Diplom-Chemiker” degree. Grade: 1.1 (on a scale from 1.0 to 5.0 with 1.0 being the best possible grade). 03/2009–12/2009 Technische Universität München, Garching, Germany: research for diploma thesis. Advisor: Wolfgang Domcke. First examiner at Philipps- Universität Marburg: Gernot Frenking. 10/2007–03/2008 Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: study-abroad semester. Research project (six months) in computational chemistry. Supervisor: Stuart A. Macgregor. Resulted in publication no. 1. 04/2006–02/2009 Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany: main-study period in Chemistry.
    [Show full text]
  • THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY: MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY and DYNAMICS 263 CHIMIA 2004, 58, No
    THEORETICAL CHEMISTRY: MOLECULAR SPECTROSCOPY AND DYNAMICS 263 CHIMIA 2004, 58, No. 5 Chimia 58 (2004) 263–275 © Schweizerische Chemische Gesellschaft ISSN 0009–4293 EDITORIAL AND REVIEW Theoretical Chemistry: Molecular Spectroscopy and Dynamics 39th Symposium on Theoretical Chemistry 2003 (STC 2003) 28 September to 2 October 2003, Gwatt, Lake Thun, Switzerland# Fabio Mariottia, Martin Quacka*, Martin Willekea, and Jürgen Stohnerb Abstract: We provide a short review of the scientific meeting defined by the title of this article, which may at the same time serve as a compact review of the field with a substantial number of references to recent work. Exciting new developments in experiments on high-resolution molecular spectra and their analysis as well as new theoret- ical developments in the calculations of such spectra and the related time-independent and time-dependent quan- tum dynamics of molecules have led to new answers but also to new questions in the fields of molecular kinetics, molecular reaction dynamics, molecular chaos and statistical mechanics as well as fundamental symmetries in mo- lecular processes. Particular stress is placed on fundamental aspects and new directions. Keywords: Chemical reaction kinetics · Molecular dynamics · Molecular spectroscopy · Quantum chemistry · Theoretical chemistry Introduction Arbeitsgemeinschaft Theoretische Chemie (AGTC) of the Deutsche Bunsenge- The present Special Issue of CHIMIA is sellschaft (DBG), the Deutsche Physikali- devoted to the scientific subject as men- sche Gesellschaft (DPG), and the Ge- tioned in the title of this review and which sellschaft Deutscher Chemiker (GDCh). was also the topic of a scientific meeting in About 170 participants attended the sympo- Gwatt, on the shore of Lake Thun in the fall sium which offered 28 lectures of 45 min of 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Theory for Complex Systems
    CRC International Symposium in Strasbourg: Chemical Theory for Complex Systems March 7-8, 2013, ISIS Hall, Université de Strasbourg, France http://www.cat.hokudai.ac.jp/crc-ctcs1/ (Please register from the Website) E-mail: [email protected] Organizer: Catalysis Research Center (CRC), Hokkaido University Co-organizer: Fukui Institute for Fundamental Chemistry, Kyoto University, Université de Strasbourg Conference Chairs: Chantal Daniel, Shigeyoshi Sakaki Organizing Committee: Kiyotaka Asakura (CRC), Jun-ya Hasegawa (CRC), Chantal Daniel (Univ. Strasbourg), Shigeyoshi Sakaki (Kyoto Univ.), Koichi Yamashita (The Univ. Tokyo) Keynote Speakers (Alphabetical) Martin Karplus (Harvard) William H. Miller (Berkeley) Keiji Morokuma (Kyoto) Plenary Lecturers Joel M. Bowman Department of Chemistry, Emory University, USA Odile Eisenstein Institut Charles Gerhardt Montpellier, CNRS-Université Montpellier 2, France Gernot Frenking Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany William A. Goddard, III Materials and Process Simulation Center, California Institute of Technology, USA Kimihiko Hirao Advanced Science Institute, RIKEN, Japan Hiroshi Nakatsuji Quantum Chemistry Research Institute (QCRI), Japan Iwao Ohmine Institute for Molecular Science, Japan Henry F. Schaefer, III Center for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, USA George C. Schatz Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, USA Per E. M. Siegbahn Department of Physics, Stockholm University, Sweden Walter Thiel Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Germany Invited Lecturers Chantal Daniel Laboratoire de Chimie Quantique, CNRS-Université de Strasbourg, France Feliu Maseras Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ), Spain Djamaladdin G. Musaev Cherry L. Emerson Center for Scientific Computation, Emory University, USA Tetsuya Taketsugu Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University, Japan Catalysis Research Center has been conducting a series of the CRC International Symposium in abroad since 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Sponsored By
    Sponsored by: PRESENTATION We welcome all participants to the “Computational Catalysis for Sustainable Chemistry” conference held at the Institute of Chemical Research of Catalonia (ICIQ) in Tarragona. The city was designated by UNESCO as a Humankind Heritage Site, which enjoys some of the best preserved Roman ruins in the Iberian Peninsula. This event is a satellite of the “16th International Congress of Quantum Chemistry” (Menton, France) and takes place in the week preceding it. The “Computational Catalysis for Sustainable Chemistry” symposium aims to bring chemists from around the world and is centered in the application of the most recent advances in computational chemistry to the field of catalysis. We strongly believe this meeting offers an excellent opportunity to meet prestigious speakers and exchange knowledge between the participating groups and strengthen the ties that may lead to future collaborations. This will be also an occasion to remember Prof. Keiji Morokuma and celebrate his legacy. Prof. Morokuma was involved in the initial design of the conference and was scheduled to be its co-chairman. Unfortunately, he had health problems over the last year and passed away on November 27th, 2017 from heart failure. We strongly encourage young scientists, particularly graduate students and postdoctoral fellows, to actively participate in the plenary lectures and a poster session. We wish you all a wonderful time in Tarragona! Feliu Maseras ICIQ Group Leader Chairperson – Computational Catalysis for Sustainable Chemistry 2 SPEAKERS Ainara Nova – University of Oslo (Norway) Ataualpa A. C. Braga – Universidade de São Paulo (Brazil) Fahmi Himo – Stockholm University (Sweden) Franziska Schoenebeck – RWTH Aachen University (Germany) Jeremy Harvey – KU Leuven (Belgium) Joachim Sauer – Humboldt Universität zu Berlin (Germany) Kathrin Helen Hopmann – UiT The Arctic University of Norway (Norway) Lionel Perrin – Université de Lyon (France) Luigi Cavallo – King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae ( +1 480 747 1385 : [email protected] Education 09/2010 Dr
    Arizona State University Matthias Heyden School of Molecular Sciences 551 E. University Dr. Tempe, AZ 85281, USA Mailcode 1604 Curriculum Vitae ( +1 480 747 1385 : [email protected] Education 09/2010 Dr. rer. nat. (equivalent to PhD) (summa cum laude) Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany 10/2004 – 02/2006 Preparational Course for fast-track PhD (instead of M.Sc.) (1.1, magna cum laude) Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany 09/2004 Bachelor of Science in Biochemistry (1.1, magna cum laude) Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany 10/2001 – 09/2004 Undergraduate Studies in Biochemistry Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany Professional Experience from 10/2017 Assistant Professor (tenure-track) School of Molecular Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 08/2013 – 09/2017 RESOLV Early Career Research Group Leader Theoretical Chemistry, Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung, Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany Host: Prof. Dr. Walter Thiel 11/2010 – 07/2013 Postdoctoral Researcher Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, USA Host: Prof. Douglas J. Tobias 02/2006 – 09/2010 Graduate Research Studies Department of Physical Chemistry II, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany Thesis:”Properties of Water at Terahertz Frequencies and Picosecond Timescales” Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Martina Havenith 12/2004 – 02/2006 Undergraduate Research Assistant Department of Physical Chemistry II, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany 06/2004 – 09/2004 Bachelor Thesis Department of Physical Chemistry II, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany Thesis: “Study of potential surfaces for the description of intermolecular vibrations” Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Martina Havenith Research Stays 04/2010 Department of Structural Biology, Weizmann Institut, Rehovot, Israel Host: Prof. Dr. Irit Sagi 06/2006 – 09/2006 Department of Chemistry, University of Nevada, Reno, USA Host: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 PROGRAM MCBR4 Scientific Meeting Venue: IWH, Hauptstrasse
    PROGRAM MCBR4 Scientific Meeting Venue: IWH, Hauptstrasse 242, D-69117 Heidelberg February 23 – 25, 2015 Institute of Inorganic Chemistry (ACI) and the Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing (IWR) Financial Support by the University of Heidelberg, the Heidelberg Graduate School MathComp (IWR), the Heidelberg Center of South Asia (HCSA) and the BASF 1 Welcome to MCBR4 MCBR4 Meeting February 23 – 25 The MCBR meetings were initiated by Profs. H. Zipse (LMU) and G.N. Sastry (IICT). Monday, February 23 MCBR1 was held in 2007 in Hyderabad, followed by MCBR2 (2009) in Wildbad Kreuth and MCBR3 (2013) in Chandigarh. In 2014, G.N. Sastry organized the 1st MCBR-related School 9:15 Welcome in Hyderabad. MCBR4 in Heidelberg is the first to combine a School for PhD students with the scientific meeting and also includes PhD student exchange to strengthen the collaboration 9:30 A Journey Through Three-Membered Rings, E. D. between Indian and German research groups. Moreover, it is the first MCBR meeting to Jemmis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore extend the Indo-German collaboration to an Indo-German-Japanese network of scientists 10:00 Coffee Break interested in the physics and modeling of chemical activity, specifically also of biological systems. We hope that MCBR meetings will continue to attract scientists from India, Germany and Japan, interested in the various aspects of fundamental theory, modeling and 10:30 Computational Mutation and Control of Enzymatic simulation of structure, electronics, interaction and reactivity of molecular systems, in Reaction, Kazunari Yoshizawa, Kyushu University particular in relation to biology, and that these meetings will continue to combine applied 11:10 Hypervalent and Planar Tetravalent Carbon in Grubbs theory and modeling and will continue to be a platform for fundamental and applied research, and Schrock Type Metallacycles, Cherumuttathu Suresh, in particular also for young scientists.
    [Show full text]
  • Topics in Current Chemistry
    368 Topics in Current Chemistry Editorial Board H. Bayley, Oxford, UK K.N. Houk, Los Angeles, CA, USA G. Hughes, CA, USA C.A. Hunter, Sheffield, UK K. Ishihara, Chikusa, Japan M.J. Krische, Austin, TX, USA J.-M. Lehn, Strasbourg Cedex, France R. Luque, Cordoba, Spain M. Olivucci, Siena, Italy J.S. Siegel, Tianjin, China J. Thiem, Hamburg, Germany M. Venturi, Bologna, Italy C.-H. Wong, Taipei, Taiwan H.N.C. Wong, Shatin, Hong Kong V.W.-W. Yam, Hong Kong, China S.-L. You, Shanghai, China Aims and Scope The series Topics in Current Chemistry presents critical reviews of the present and future trends in modern chemical research. The scope of coverage includes all areas of chemical science including the interfaces with related disciplines such as biology, medicine and materials science. The goal of each thematic volume is to give the non-specialist reader, whether at the university or in industry, a comprehensive overview of an area where new insights are emerging that are of interest to larger scientific audience. Thus each review within the volume critically surveys one aspect of that topic and places it within the context of the volume as a whole. The most significant developments of the last 5 to 10 years should be presented. A description of the laboratory procedures involved is often useful to the reader. The coverage should not be exhaustive in data, but should rather be conceptual, concentrating on the methodological thinking that will allow the non-specialist reader to understand the information presented. Discussion of possible future research directions in the area is welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Double‐Hybrid Density Functional Theory
    Review DOI: 10.1002/ijch.201900114 Empirical Double-Hybrid Density Functional Theory: A ‘Third Way’ in Between WFT and DFT Jan M. L. Martin*[a] and Golokesh Santra[a] Dedication: In fond, appreciative memory of Walter Thiel (1947–2019) Abstract: Double hybrid density functional theory arguably electronic structure code. Only a half-dozen or fewer sits on the seamline between wavefunction methods and empirical parameters are required. For vibrational frequen- DFT: it represents a special case of Rung 5 on the “Jacob’s cies, accuracies intermediate between CCSD and CCSD(T) Ladder” of John P. Perdew. For large and chemically diverse can be achieved, and performance for other properties is benchmarks such as GMTKN55, empirical double hybrid encouraging as well. Organometallic reactions can likewise functionals with dispersion corrections can achieve accura- be treated well, provided static correlation is not too strong. cies approaching wavefunction methods at a cost not greatly Further prospects are discussed, including range-separated dissimilar to hybrid DFT approaches, provided RI-MP2 and/ and RPA-based approaches. or another MP2 acceleration techniques are available in the Keywords: Double hybrid DFT · Jacob’s Ladder · Benchmarks · Dispersion · Empiricity 1. Introduction Wavefunction-based ab initio theory (WFT) and density functional theory (DFT) are the two primary approaches of electronic structure. WFT methods can approach exact solutions of the Schrödinger equation to almost arbitrary accuracy (see, e.g., Refs. [1–4] and references therein). Alas, its unfavorable CPU time scaling with system size (N7 for CCSD(T),[5,6] steeper for more rigorous methods) limits its applicability (as of 2019) to small molecules.
    [Show full text]