Establishing a Syrian War Crimes Tribunal? Joint Hearing
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Journal of Global Rights and Organizations Annual Review
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL RIGHTS AND ORGANIZATIONS ANNUAL REVIEW VOLUME 9 2018-2019 ARTICLES An Emphasis on Relationships: The Driver for Success of the Special Court for Sierra Leone’s Office of the Prosecutor Kiri Latuskie Trade Liberation and Labor Bondage: US Agreements with Mexico and Colombia Julia Neusner The International, Impartial and Independent Mechanism on Syrian War Crimes: What It Does and Doesn’t Do Deanna Rafla-Yuan NOTES The Link Between Piracy and Terrorism: A Suggested Course of Action for an Unsolvable Issue Benjamin Millard Gender Identity and Asylum: The New Standard to Be Applied for Transgender Applicants Seeking Relief Under a Claim of Asylum, Withholding of Removal, and Convention Against Torture Jamie Richards IMPUNITY WATCH ESSAY CONTEST WINNER Silence is the Killer: Fighting for the Millions of Unheard Voices Hannah Yi J. GLOB. RTS. & ORG. VOL. 9 Impunity Watch and the Journal of Global Rights and Organizations (JGRO) is owned, published, and printed annually by Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244-1030, U.S.A. The recently renamed Journal of Global Rights and Organizations is an annual journal publication run by Syracuse University College of Law students. JGRO focuses on human rights as they are practiced and applied in various regional courts around the globe, including the International Criminal Court, Inter-American Court and Commission of Human Rights, European Court and Commission of Human Rights, and African Court and Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights. JGRO is a platform for cutting-edge legal scholarship and research; is free to read online at impunitywatch.com/category/journal; and the journal may also be found in the U.S. -
David M. Crane Professor of Practice
David M. Crane Professor of Practice Publications Syracuse University College of Law Publications – David Crane Books and Monographs THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW DIALOGS (Mark David Agrast, Emily Scheider and David Crane eds., 2016). The Proceedings of the Eighth International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 47 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2015). The Proceedings of the Seventh International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 46 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2014). A Report Into the Credibility of Certain Evidence With Regard to Torture and Execution of Persons Incarcerated by the Current Syrian Regime (with Right Honourable Sir Desmond de Silva, et al., 2014). The Proceedings of the Sixth International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 45 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2013). The Proceedings of the Fifth International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 44 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2012). The Proceedings of the Fourth International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 43 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2011). The Proceedings of the Third International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 42 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2010). The Proceedings of the Second International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 40 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2009). The Proceedings of the First International Humanitarian Law Dialogs, in STUDIES IN TRANSNATIONAL LEGAL POLICY NO. 39 (Elizabeth Anderson & David M. Crane eds., 2008). -
When Justice Leads, Does Politics Follow? the Realist Limits of Stigmatizing War Criminals Through International Prosecution
When Justice Leads, Does Politics Follow? The Realist Limits of Stigmatizing War Criminals through International Prosecution Kenneth A. Rodman Colby College Abstract Human rights advocates have called for ICC investigations in situations like Syria or North Korea regardless of the political strategies adopted by the international community toward those regimes. Part of the rationale for this advocacy is the presumed normative pull of international justice, which can stigmatize those indicted to both international and domestic audiences, leading to their marginalization. However, the examples most closely associated with this argument – Radovan Karadžić and Ratko Mladić (1995), Slobodan Milošević (1999), and Charles Taylor (2003) – are false positives since they correlated with a political commitment by powerful states to remove those actors from power. By contrast, when powerful third parties want to engage regimes whose leaders subjected to criminal scrutiny – either because of shared interests or a diplomatic approach to conflict management – the stigmatizing impact of criminalization is limited because states will ignore or reinterpret their international legal obligations. This is demonstrated by the ICTR’s failure to prosecute commanders of the Rwandan Patriotic Front and the problems the ICC has encountered in its Darfur and Kenyan investigations. The findings support a qualified realist view that the effectiveness of international criminal tribunals is dependent on the political strategies and capabilities of powerful states. Introduction In 2014, the UN Security Council deliberated over referring the Syrian civil war to the International Criminal Court and a UN Commission of Inquiry has recommended it do the same for North Korea.1 While Russia and China vetoed the Syrian resolution – and would likely do the same for one on North Korea – the prospects for accountability in either case would appear to be dim even if referrals were authorized. -
David M. Crane Professor and Former Chief Prosecutor Special Court For
David M. Crane Professor and Former Chief Prosecutor Special Court for Sierra Leone Syracuse University College of Law MacNaughton Hall Syracuse, New York 13244 [email protected] / [email protected] (Cell: 571-331-5361) Proven leader at the national and international level with over 33 years of public service leading, managing, creating, and nurturing organizations overseeing budgets in the billions of dollars. World renowned jurist and international prosecutor with vast experience in the fields of international criminal law, national security law, and international law. Innovative manager with a reputation of creating new organizations and administering these organizations to mission/mandate success. Strong academic experience developing and nurturing students for the challenges of practicing law in the 21st Century using decades of legal practice to teach and inspire future lawyers who will operate in a global village. Exceptional speaking and advocacy skills, able to communicate in various settings before varied audiences. Experienced fundraiser at the local, national, and international level. Recent work experience. --Member, Advisory Committee to the Sri Lankan Presidential Commission Regarding Missing Persons. 2014. --Professor of Practice, Syracuse University, College of Law, 2006-Present. Teaches international law, international criminal law, international humanitarian law, national security law and other related subjects. Faculty member, Institute for National Security and Counterterrorism, Syracuse University Maxwell School of Public Citizenship. Distinguished Visiting Professor of Law 2005-2006 at Syracuse University. Counselor, American Bar Association, International Law Section. Founding publisher of Impunity 1 Watch (www.impunitywatch.com) an on line law review of Syracuse University College of Law. Member of the Board of the Public International Law and Policy Group and the Robert H.