DOCSLIB.ORG

JET FRAGMENTATION TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM from H–H CORRELATIONS in Pp and P–Pb COLLISIONS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
JET FRAGMENTATION TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM from H–H CORRELATIONS in Pp and P–Pb COLLISIONS DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS UNIVERSITY OF JYVÄSKYLÄ RESEARCH REPORT No. 7/2017 JET FRAGMENTATION TRANSVERSE MOMENTUM FROM h–h CORRELATIONS IN pp AND p–Pb COLLISIONS BY JUSSI VIINIKAINEN Academic Dissertation for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy To be presented, by permission of the Faculty of Mathematics and Science of the University of Jyväskylä, for public examination in Auditorium FYS1 of the University of Jyväskylä on December 15, 2017 at 12 o’clock noon Jyväskylä, Finland December 2017 PERSONAL CONTRIBUTION Viinikainen, Jussi Jet fragmentation transverse momentum from h–h correlations in pp and p–Pb collisions Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä, 2017, 114 p. Department of Physics Research Report No. 7/2017 ISSN 0075-465X; 7/2017 ISBN 978-951-39-7288-2 (paper version) ISBN 978-951-39-7289-9 (electronic version) Diss. Keywords: Jet, fragmentation, transverse momentum, ALICE, correlations, proton, lead, CERN, LHC The main contributions of the author to the research presented in this thesis are listed below. – Commissioning and maintenance of the level-0 trigger of the electromagnetic calorimeter at the ALICE experiment. (Section 2.3.6) p = – Jet fragmentationp transverse momentum (jT) analysis for s 7 TeV pp data and sNN = 5.02 TeV p–Pb data. – Implementation for the observable jT (Section 4.2). – Implementation for the background of the jT distribution (Section 4.2). – Deriving the acceptance correction for the analysis (Section 4.4). – Validating analysis assumptions using PYTHIA 8 simulation (Section 4.5). – Fitting the measured jT distributions (Section 4.6). – Deriving the final results from the fit parameters (Section 4.7). – Systematic uncertainty analysis (Chapter 5). – Interpretation of the results and comparing data to models (Chapter 6). Author Jussi Viinikainen University of Jyväskylä Helsinki Institute of Physics Finland Supervisor Professor Jan Rak University of Jyväskylä Helsinki Institute of Physics Finland Reviewers Professor Olga Evdokimov University of Illinois at Chicago USA Doctor Nathan Grau Augustana University USA Opponent Professor Gunther Roland Massachusetts Institute of Technology USA PREFACE FIGURE 1 Cartoon drawn by Zach Wienersmith. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work presented in this thesis has been carried out between 2012 and 2017 at the University of Jyväskylä and at CERN. Here, in the beginning of my thesis, I would like to acknowledge the help I have received from several other people that has made my graduation possible. First, I would like to than my supervisor Jan Rak. Under his guidance I have learned how to become an independent researcher, which is a quality that is for sure helpful in the future. From our research group, I would also like to highlight Sami Räsänen and Dong Jo Kim. The support I have received from Sami has been invaluable. We have had numerous discussions on physics and practical issues during the PhD work, and Sami also provided a lot of feedback from my thesis. With Dong Jo we have also had physics discussions and his pieces of advice on how to write analysis code have been helpful in improving the analysis techniques. Regarding the experimental work at CERN, I would like to thank JiˇríKrál for teaching me all I know about the level-0 trigger system of the electromagnetic calorimeter in ALICE. I would also like to thank Martin Poghosyan for his help and advice regarding the practical work with the detector. I would like to thank Olga Evdokimov and Nathan Grau for reviewing my thesis and providing useful comments and Gunther Roland for promising to be my Opponent. For providing me things to do also outside physics, I would like to thank my friends both in Jyväskylä and in CERN. This aspect should not be underrated. A special thanks goes also to my family, from which I can always get uncon- ditional love and support. I would also like to acknowledge the financial support I have received from the University of Jyväskylä, the Magnus Ehrnrooth foundation and the Helsinki Institute of Physics. You cannot do science with an empty stomach. CONTENTS PERSONAL CONTRIBUTION PREFACE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................ 1 1.1 Quantum chromodynamics ....................................................... 2 1.1.1 Asymptotic freedom ...................................................... 3 1.2 Heavy ion physics .................................................................... 5 1.2.1 Nuclear phase diagram .................................................. 5 1.2.2 Developments on quark-gluon plasma signatures............. 6 1.2.3 Cold nuclear matter ....................................................... 10 1.3 Jet fragmentation...................................................................... 11 1.3.1 Parton shower evolution ................................................ 11 1.3.2 Hadronization ............................................................... 15 1.3.3 Experimental techniques ................................................ 15 1.4 Monte Carlo implementations of jet fragmentation ...................... 16 1.4.1 PYTHIA ......................................................................... 16 1.4.2 Herwig ......................................................................... 20 2 EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS............................................................... 23 2.1 CERN...................................................................................... 23 2.2 Large Hadron Collider .............................................................. 25 2.2.1 Heavy ion experiment: ALICE ........................................ 26 2.2.2 Multipurpose experiments: ATLAS and CMS................... 27 2.2.3 Matter-antimatter asymmetry: LHCb .............................. 27 2.2.4 Smaller experiments: LHCf, TOTEM and MoEDAL .......... 27 2.3 ALICE..................................................................................... 27 2.3.1 Tracking detectors.......................................................... 28 2.3.2 Particle identification detectors ....................................... 30 2.3.3 Electromagnetic calorimetry ........................................... 31 2.3.4 Muon spectrometer........................................................ 31 2.3.5 Forward and trigger detectors......................................... 31 2.3.6 L0 trigger in EMCal ....................................................... 32 3 EVENT AND TRACK SELECTION.................................................... 39 3.1 Event selection ......................................................................... 39 3.2 Track selection.......................................................................... 39 4 ANALYSIS METHODS ..................................................................... 45 4.1 Two-particle correlations ........................................................... 45 4.2 Definition of jT distribution and background............................... 46 4.3 Efficiency correction.................................................................. 49 4.4 Acceptance correction ............................................................... 50 4.5 Di-gluon PYTHIA ...................................................................... 60 4.6 Fitting jT distribution ................................................................ 62 q 2 4.7 Extracting jT and per trigger yield ....................................... 66 5 SYSTEMATIC UNCERTAINTIES ....................................................... 69 5.1 Background ............................................................................. 69 5.2 Fitting methods ........................................................................ 70 5.3 Tracking .................................................................................. 72 5.4 Summary................................................................................. 72 6 RESULTS.........................................................................................q 75 2 6.1 Results for jT ..................................................................... 75 6.2 Results for per trigger jT yield.................................................... 78 6.3 Comparison to models .............................................................. 80 7 SUMMARY AND OUTLOOK ........................................................... 82 APPENDIX 1 TOY SIMULATION........................................................... 84 1.1 Simulation details..................................................................... 84 1.2 Results in xk and pTa bins .......................................................... 85 1.3 Breaking the trigger assumptions ............................................... 87 APPENDIX 2 STUDY ON hZi OF TRIGGER PARTICLES.......................... 89 APPENDIX 3 GLOSSARY OF USED SYMBOLS ....................................... 92 REFERENCES.......................................................................................... 93 1 INTRODUCTION The nature is governed by four basic interactions: electromagnetic, strong, weak and gravity. While the gravity is best modeled by the theory of relativity [1], all the other forces are very successfully and accurately described in the Standard Model of particle physics [2]. The Standard Model consists of the electroweak model [3–5] combining the electromagnetic and weak interactions, and quantum chromodynamics (QCD) [6] describing the strong interactions. This thesis con- centrates on studying QCD. The constituents of matter interacting via the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CERN Courier–Digital Edition
    CERNMarch/April 2021 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WELCOME CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the March/April 2021 issue of CERN Courier. Hadron colliders have contributed to a golden era of discovery in high-energy physics, hosting experiments that have enabled physicists to unearth the cornerstones of the Standard Model. This success story began 50 years ago with CERN’s Intersecting Storage Rings (featured on the cover of this issue) and culminated in the Large Hadron Collider (p38) – which has spawned thousands of papers in its first 10 years of operations alone (p47). It also bodes well for a potential future circular collider at CERN operating at a centre-of-mass energy of at least 100 TeV, a feasibility study for which is now in full swing. Even hadron colliders have their limits, however. To explore possible new physics at the highest energy scales, physicists are mounting a series of experiments to search for very weakly interacting “slim” particles that arise from extensions in the Standard Model (p25). Also celebrating a golden anniversary this year is the Institute for Nuclear Research in Moscow (p33), while, elsewhere in this issue: quantum sensors HADRON COLLIDERS target gravitational waves (p10); X-rays go behind the scenes of supernova 50 years of discovery 1987A (p12); a high-performance computing collaboration forms to handle the big-physics data onslaught (p22); Steven Weinberg talks about his latest work (p51); and much more. To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://comms.iop.org/k/iop/cerncourier To subscribe to the magazine, please visit: https://cerncourier.com/p/about-cern-courier EDITOR: MATTHEW CHALMERS, CERN DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY IOP PUBLISHING ATLAS spots rare Higgs decay Weinberg on effective field theory Hunting for WISPs CCMarApr21_Cover_v1.indd 1 12/02/2021 09:24 CERNCOURIER www.
    [Show full text]
  • The LHC Project and Future of CERN
    The LHC Project and Future of CERN Robert Aymar Symposium on Physics of Elementary Interactions in the LHC Era Warsaw, 21–22 April 2008 Contents about CERN: a facility for the benefit of the European Particle Physics Community the LHC project: completion of installation, start of commissioning for accelerator, experiments and computing, the CNGS: start of operations and the CLIC scheme for multi Tev e+e- Linear Collider plans for CERN in the next decade Warsaw, 21-22 April 2008 2 CERN… • Seeking answers to questions about the Universe • Advancing the frontiers of technology • Training the scientists of tomorrow • Bringing nations together through science 33 CERN in Numbers • 2415 staff* • 730 Fellows and Associates* • 9133 users* • Budget (2007) 982 MCHF (610M Euro) *5 February 2008 • Member States: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. • Observers to Council: India, Israel, Japan, the Russian Federation, the United States of America, Turkey, the European Warsaw, 21-22Commission April 2008 and Unesco 4 Distribution of All CERN Users by Nation of Institute on 5 February 2008 Warsaw, 21-22 April 2008 5 CERN: the World’s Most Complete Accelerator Complex (not to scale) Warsaw, 21-22 April 2008 6 TheThe LongLong--TermTerm ScientificScientific ProgrammeProgramme Legend: Approved Under Consideration 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 LHC Experiments ALICE ATLAS CMS LHCb TOTEM LHCf Other LHC Experiments (e.g. MOEDAL) Non-LHC Experimental Programme SPS NA58 (COMPASS) P326 (NA48/3)/NA62 P327 (EM processes in strong crystalline fields) NA49-future/NA61 Neutrino / CNGS New initiatives PS PS212 (DIRAC) PS215 (CLOUD) OTHER FACILITIES AD ISOLDE n-TOF Neutron CAST P331 (optical axion search and QED test) Test Beams North Areas West Areas East Hall R&D (Detector & Accelerator) 7 Poland and the Four Strategic Missions of CERN FUNADAMENTAL RESEARCH • Polish physicists collaborate with CERN since 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thermionic Electron Gun for the Preliminary Phase of Ctf3 G
    Proceedings of EPAC 2002, Paris, France A THERMIONIC ELECTRON GUN FOR THE PRELIMINARY PHASE OF CTF3 G. Bienvenu, M. Bernard, J. Le Duff, LAL, Orsay, France H. Hellgren, R. Pittin, L. Rinolfi, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Abstract A dedicated electron gun has been designed and built Table 1: Beam parameters at gun exit for the preliminary phase of the CLIC Test Facility 3 Nominal beam energy 90 keV (CTF3). The gun is based on a thermionic gridded Pulse width 2 to 10 ns cathode and operates at 90 kV in the intensity range of Intensity 0.05 to 2 A 50 mA to 2A. The specific time structure of the beam is Number of pulses 1 to 7 characterized by a burst of up to seven pulses of variable Repetition rate 50 Hz pulse width (4 to 10 ns) each separated by 420 ns, the revolution time of the former EPA (Electron Positron Emittance (rms) <15 mm.mrd Accumulator) ring. The mechanical conception was specifically designed to be compatible with the existing 2.1 Mechanical design front-end of the former LIL (LEP Injector Linac). We will The vacuum chamber of the CLIO gun has been designed describe the experimental results obtained with the beam to fit existing CERN equipment, in particular the gun is on CTF3. fully compatible with the «CERN plug-in system» and an existing pair of ion pumps. All inner elements have been 1 INTRODUCTION baked under vacuum (400 ºC, 10-5 mbar, 12 h) and assembled under clean laminar airflow. With these The Compact Linear Collider (CLIC) scheme is based precautions a pressure of 10-9 mbar was obtained very on the production of a 30 GHz RF pulse that requires quickly and the HV processing reduced to a few hours.
    [Show full text]
  • A Spectrometer for Proton Driven Plasma Accelerated Electrons at Awake - Recent Developments∗
    Proceedings of IPAC2016, Busan, Korea WEPMY024 A SPECTROMETER FOR PROTON DRIVEN PLASMA ACCELERATED ELECTRONS AT AWAKE - RECENT DEVELOPMENTS∗ Lawrence Charles Deacon, Simon Jolly, Fearghus Keeble, UCL, London Aurélie Goldblatt, Stefano Mazzoni, Alexey Petrenko, CERN, Geneva Bartolomej Biskup, CERN, Geneva; Czech Technical University, Prague 6 Matthew Wing, UCL, London; DESY, Hamburg; University of Hamburg, Hamburg Abstract SPECTROMETER DESIGN The AWAKE experiment is to be constructed at the CERN Neutrinos to Gran Sasso facility (CNGS). This will be the first experiment to demonstrate proton-driven plasma wake- field acceleration. The 400 GeV proton beam from the CERN SPS will excite a wakefield in a plasma cell several meters in length. To probe the plasma wakefield, electrons of 10–20 MeV will be injected into the wakefield follow- ing the head of the proton beam. Simulations indicate that electrons will be accelerated to GeV energies by the plasma wakefield. The AWAKE spectrometer is intended to measure both the peak energy and energy spread of these accelerated electrons. Results of beam tests of the scintillator screen Figure 1: A 3D CAD image of the spectrometer system output are presented, along with tests of the resolution of annotated with distances along the z direction from the exit the proposed optical system. The results are used together of the plasma cell to the magnetic centers of magnets, and with a BDSIM simulation of the spectrometer system to pre- the center of the scintillator screen. dict the spectrometer performance for a range of possible accelerated electron distributions. INTRODUCTION RESOLUTION Proton bunches are the most promising drivers of wake- Optical System fields to accelerate electrons to the TeV energy scale in a The resolution of the energy spectrometer will ultimateley single stage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moedal Experiment at the LHC. Searching Beyond the Standard
    126 EPJ Web of Conferences , 02024 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201612602024 ICNFP 2015 The MoEDAL experiment at the LHC Searching beyond the standard model James L. Pinfold (for the MoEDAL Collaboration)1,a 1 University of Alberta, Physics Department, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 0V1, Canada Abstract. MoEDAL is a pioneering experiment designed to search for highly ionizing avatars of new physics such as magnetic monopoles or massive (pseudo-)stable charged particles. Its groundbreaking physics program defines a number of scenarios that yield potentially revolutionary insights into such foundational questions as: are there extra dimensions or new symmetries; what is the mechanism for the generation of mass; does magnetic charge exist; what is the nature of dark matter; and, how did the big-bang develop. MoEDAL’s purpose is to meet such far-reaching challenges at the frontier of the field. The innovative MoEDAL detector employs unconventional methodologies tuned to the prospect of discovery physics. The largely passive MoEDAL detector, deployed at Point 8 on the LHC ring, has a dual nature. First, it acts like a giant camera, comprised of nuclear track detectors - analyzed offline by ultra fast scanning microscopes - sensitive only to new physics. Second, it is uniquely able to trap the particle messengers of physics beyond the Standard Model for further study. MoEDAL’s radiation environment is monitored by a state-of-the-art real-time TimePix pixel detector array. A new MoEDAL sub-detector to extend MoEDAL’s reach to millicharged, minimally ionizing, particles (MMIPs) is under study Finally we shall describe the next step for MoEDAL called Cosmic MoEDAL, where we define a very large high altitude array to take the search for highly ionizing avatars of new physics to higher masses that are available from the cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration in AWAKE
    Proton Driven Plasma Article submitted to journal Wakefield Acceleration in Subject Areas: AWAKE Plasma Wakefield Acceleration, 1 1 Proton Driven, Electron Acceleration E. Gschwendtner , M. Turner , **Author List Continues Next Page** Keywords: AWAKE, Plasma Wakefield Acceleration, Seeded Self Modulation In this article, we briefly summarize the experiments Author for correspondence: performed during the first Run of the Advanced Insert corresponding author name Wakefield Experiment, AWAKE, at CERN (European e-mail: [email protected] Organization for Nuclear Research). The final goal of AWAKE Run 1 (2013 - 2018) was to demonstrate that 10-20 MeV electrons can be accelerated to GeV- energies in a plasma wakefield driven by a highly- relativistic self-modulated proton bunch. We describe the experiment, outline the measurement concept and present first results. Last, we outline our plans for the future. 1 Continued Author List 2 E. Adli2,A. Ahuja1,O. Apsimon3;4,R. Apsimon3;4, A.-M. Bachmann1;5;6,F. Batsch1;5;6 C. Bracco1,F. Braunmüller5,S. Burger1,G. Burt7;4, B. Buttenschön8,A. Caldwell5,J. Chappell9, E. Chevallay1,M. Chung10,D. Cooke9,H. Damerau1, L.H. Deubner11,A. Dexter7;4,S. Doebert1, J. Farmer12, V.N. Fedosseev1,R. Fiorito13;4,R.A. Fonseca14,L. Garolfi1,S. Gessner1, B. Goddard1, I. Gorgisyan1,A.A. Gorn15;16,E. Granados1,O. Grulke8;17, A. Hartin9,A. Helm18, J.R. Henderson7;4,M. Hüther5, M. Ibison13;4,S. Jolly9,F. Keeble9,M.D. Kelisani1, S.-Y. Kim10, F. Kraus11,M. Krupa1, T. Lefevre1,Y. Li3;4,S. Liu19,N. Lopes18,K.V. Lotov15;16, M. Martyanov5, S.
    [Show full text]
  • EPS-HEP 2017 Report of Contributions
    EPS-HEP 2017 Report of Contributions https://indico.cern.ch/e/epshep2017 EPS-HEP 2017 / Report of Contributions Theory overview on FCNC B-decays Contribution ID: 10 Type: Parallel Talk Theory overview on FCNC B-decays Thursday, 6 July 2017 09:00 (30 minutes) LHCb experiment at CERN has recently reported a set of measurements on lepton flavour univer- sality in b to s transitions showing a departure from the Standard Model predictions. I will review the main ideas recently put forward to make sense out of these intriguing hints. Focusing on the new physics explanation, I will discuss the correlated signals expected in other low- and high- energy observables, that could help clarify the mysterious signal. Experimental Collaboration Primary author: GRELJO, Admir (University of Zurich) Presenter: GRELJO, Admir (University of Zurich) Session Classification: Flavour and symmetries Track Classification: Flavour Physics and Fundamental Symmetries October 6, 2021 Page 1 EPS-HEP 2017 / Report of Contributions Charm Quark Mass with Calibrate … Contribution ID: 11 Type: Parallel Talk Charm Quark Mass with Calibrated Uncertainty Friday, 7 July 2017 12:35 (13 minutes) We determine the charm quark mass mc(mc) from QCD sum rules of moments of the vector cur- rent correlator calculated in perturbative QCD. Only experimental data for the charm resonances below the continuum threshold are needed in our approach, while the continuum contribution is determined by requiring self-consistency between various sum rules, including the one for the ze- roth moment. Existing data from the continuum region can then be used to bound the theoretical error. Our result is mc(mc) = 1272 ± 8 MeV for αs(MZ ) = 0:1182.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Physics
    If you would like to register to receive Fascination automatically ISSUE 11 please visit www.stfc.ac.uk/fascination News from the Cover image: A proton collision at the ATLAS experiment which produced a microscopic-black-hole. Credit: CERN Science and Technology particle Facilities Council Exploring & Understanding Science physics special CONTENTS Benefits of particle physics LHC leads the way on new technology Higgs - The story so far Higgs Boson dominated the news media for two days LHC on tour in the UK Using the very large to look for the extremely small How did the Universe begin? What are we made of? Why are all world class. It represents amazing value for the amount does matter behave the way it does? These are questions of added benefit we get from what is at heart a fundamental that particle physics can answer. Particle physics is an ideal science project. With the recent breakthrough discovery of a showcase for STFC’s work – a subject where the research, the Higgs-like particle, this edition is focussing on particle physics resultant innovation and the inspirational value of the science and why it matters to the UK. The benefits of particle physics to you and everyone you know nature of matter, the so called known unknowns, and in the process uncover new questions we have yet to answer. It’s a compellingly difficult search that pushes our understanding of matter beyond the limits of what was previously possible. But the search is expensive, times are tough and costs need to be justified, so the secondary benefits from the research are often just as important.
    [Show full text]
  • Slides Lecture 1
    Advanced Topics in Particle Physics Probing the High Energy Frontier at the LHC Ulrich Husemann, Klaus Reygers, Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg Winter Semester 2009/2010 CERN = European Laboratory for Partice Physics the world’s largest particle physics laboratory, founded 1954 Historic name: “Conseil Européen pour la Recherche Nucléaire” Lake Geneva Proton-proton2500 employees, collider almost 10000 guest scientists from 85 nations Jura Mountains 8.5 km Accelerator complex Prévessin site (approx. 100 m underground) (France) Meyrin site (Switzerland) Probing the High Energy Frontier at the LHC, U Heidelberg, Winter Semester 09/10, Lecture 1 2 Large Hadron Collider: CMS Experiment: Proton-Proton and Multi Purpose Detector Lead-Lead Collisions LHCb Experiment: B Physics and CP Violation ALICE-Experiment: ATLAS Experiment: Heavy Ion Physics Multi Purpose Detector Probing the High Energy Frontier at the LHC, U Heidelberg, Winter Semester 09/10, Lecture 1 3 The Lecture “Probing the High Energy Frontier at the LHC” Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN: premier address in experimental particle physics for the next 10+ years LHC restart this fall: first beam scheduled for mid-November LHC and Heidelberg Experimental groups from Heidelberg participate in three out of four large LHC experiments (ALICE, ATLAS, LHCb) Theory groups working on LHC physics → Cornerstone of physics research in Heidelberg → Lots of exciting opportunities for young people Probing the High Energy Frontier at the LHC, U Heidelberg, Winter Semester 09/10, Lecture 1 4 Scope
    [Show full text]
  • Detection of Cosmic Rays at the LHC Detection of Cosmic Rays at the LHC
    Particle and Astroparticle Physics at the Large Hadron Collider --Hadronic Interactions-- Albert De Roeck CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Antwerp University Belgium UC-Davis California USA NTU, Singapore November 15th 2019 Outline • Introduction on the LHC and LHC physics program • LHC results for Astroparticle physics • Measurements of event characteristics at 13 TeV • Forward measurements • Cosmic ray measurements • LHC and light ions? • Summary The LHC Machine and Experiments MoEDAL LHCf FASER totem CM energy → Run-1: (2010-2012) 7/8 TeV Run-2: (2015-2018) 13 TeV -> Now 8 experiments Run-2 starts proton-proton Run-2 finished 24/10/18 6:00am 2018 2010-2012: Run-1 at 7/8 TeV CM energy Collected ~ 27 fb-1 2015-2018: Run-2 at 13 TeV CM Energy Collected ~ 140 fb-1 2021-2023/24 : Run-3 Expect ⇨ 14 TeV CM Energy and ~ 200/300 fb-1 The LHC is also a Heavy Ion Collider ALICE Data taking during the HI run • All experiments take AA or pA data (except TOTEM) Expected for Run-3: in addition short pO and OO runs ⇨ pO certainly of interest for Cosmic Ray Physics Community! 4 10 years of LHC Operation • LHC: 7 TeV in March 2010 ->The highest energy in the lab! • LHC @ 13 TeV from 2015 onwards March 30 2010 …waiting.. • Most important highlight so far: …since 4:00 am The discovery of a Higgs boson • Many results on Standard Model process measurements, QCD and particle production, top-physics, b-physics, heavy ion physics, searches, Higgs physics • Waiting for the next discovery… -> Searches beyond the Standard Model 12:58 7 TeV collisions!!! New Physics Hunters
    [Show full text]
  • Laboratori Nazionali Di Frascati
    International Committee for Future Accelerators Sponsored by the Particles and Fields Commission of IUPAP Beam Dynamics Newsletter No. 51 Issue Editor: S. Chattopadhyay Editor in Chief: W. Chou April 2010 3 Contents 1 FOREWORD ........................................................................................................ 11 1.1 FROM THE CHAIRMAN ............................................................................................. 11 1.2 FROM THE EDITOR .................................................................................................. 12 2 INTERNATIONAL LINEAR COLLIDER (ILC) ............................................ 14 2.1 FIFTH INTERNATIONAL ACCELERATOR SCHOOL FOR LINEAR COLLIDERS ............... 14 3 THEME SECTION: ACCELERATOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY IN THE UK ................................................................................................................ 20 3.1 OVERVIEW – AN EMERGING PARADIGM OF COLLABORATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES, NATIONAL FACILITIES AND INDUSTRY ............................................ 20 3.1.1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 Mission of UK Accelerator Science and Technology .................................. 20 3.1.3 The Model: Integrated Accelerator Community and Stakeholders .............. 21 3.1.4 The Research Program Driven by Science ................................................... 21 3.1.4.1 Research Focus: Current ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The AWAKE Acceleration Scheme for New Particle Physics Experiments at CERN
    AWAKE++: the AWAKE Acceleration Scheme for New Particle Physics Experiments at CERN W. Bartmann1, A. Caldwell2, M. Calviani1, J. Chappell3, P. Crivelli4, H. Damerau1, E. Depero4, S. Doebert1, J. Gall1, S. Gninenko5, B. Goddard1, D. Grenier1, E. Gschwendtner*1, Ch. Hessler1, A. Hartin3, F. Keeble3, J. Osborne1, A. Pardons1, A. Petrenko1, A. Scaachi3, and M. Wing3 1CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 2Max Planck Institute for Physics, Munich, Germany 3University College London, London, UK 4ETH Zürich, Switzerland 5INR Moscow, Russia 1 Abstract The AWAKE experiment reached all planned milestones during Run 1 (2016-18), notably the demon- stration of strong plasma wakes generated by proton beams and the acceleration of externally injected electrons to multi-GeV energy levels in the proton driven plasma wakefields. During Run 2 (2021 - 2024) AWAKE aims to demonstrate the scalability and the acceleration of elec- trons to high energies while maintaining the beam quality. Within the Physics Beyond Colliders (PBC) study AWAKE++ has explored the feasibility of the AWAKE acceleration scheme for new particle physics experiments at CERN. Assuming continued success of the AWAKE program, AWAKE will be in the position to use the AWAKE scheme for particle physics ap- plications such as fixed target experiments for dark photon searches and also for future electron-proton or electron-ion colliders. With strong support from the accelerator and high energy physics community, these experiments could be installed during CERN LS3; the integration and beam line design show the feasibility of a fixed target experiment in the AWAKE facility, downstream of the AWAKE experiment in the former CNGS area. The expected electrons on target for fixed target experiments exceeds the electrons on target by three to four orders of magnitude with respect to the current NA64 experiment, making it a very promising experiment in the search for new physics.
    [Show full text]